Egyptian investigation team says it has not yet found evidence of a version of the attack aboard a Russian airliner.

39
Information Agency Reuters with reference to representatives of the Egyptian investigative group, reports on the publication of a report on the causes of the crash of the aircraft of the Russian airline Kogalymavia, coming from the resort of Sharm-al-Sheikh (Egypt) to St. Petersburg. Recall the plane, falling apart in the air, fell on the Sinai Peninsula. Then (October 31) killed 224 person. A few days later, the FSB director Alexander Bortnikov stated that the cause of the catastrophe was a terrorist act — an explosive device was set off on board the airliner.

If we believe Reuters, the Egyptian side claims that it does not have a confirmation of the version of the terrorist act on board the Russian passenger aircraft.

From a statement by a representative of the Ministry of Civil aviation Egypt, which is provided by the Western News Agency:
The investigative commission has not yet discovered what would indicate an unlawful intervention or a terrorist act.


Egyptian investigation team says it has not yet found evidence of a version of the attack aboard a Russian airliner.


Is it any wonder this conclusion, especially given the fact that, firstly, Egypt is not interested in confirming the version of the terrorist attack, secondly, there is, for example, a Dutch commission, which was not enough to find an obvious conclusion in investigation of the collapse of the Malaysian liner near Donetsk.

In the special services of the Russian Federation previously stated that the wreckage of the aircraft and the personal belongings of the passengers were thoroughly analyzed, as a result of which traces of foreign-made explosive were found. According to Alexander Bortnikov, the power of an improvised explosive device did not exceed 1 kg in TNT equivalent. Later, a photo appeared on the Internet, published by Daesh (ISIS) militants who claimed responsibility for the attack, in which a tin can from a soda and activating an explosive was presented as a copy of an explosive device powered by A-321. items.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    14 December 2015 12: 51
    Is it worth wondering at this conclusion, especially considering the fact that, firstly, Egypt is not interested in confirming the version of the attack,

    100%
    1. +7
      14 December 2015 12: 52
      Well, of course. Egypt is losing the tour stream. it’s not beneficial for them to claim that this is a terrorist attack.
      1. +4
        14 December 2015 12: 56
        Quote: Uranus
        Well, of course. Egypt is losing the tour stream. it’s not beneficial for them to claim that this is a terrorist attack.


        They need to quickly clean up and guarantee safety, then the tourists will return.
        1. +2
          14 December 2015 21: 19
          Tell me please. Who now in the world will give a 100% guarantee of security. I believe that the guarantee of security at the moment is some moderation in desires (for example, to relax abroad). After all, we have already passed the line where a trip abroad is considered to be the criterion of welfare. In the end, it is at least not safe even in prosperous countries, so to speak!
          PS
          Do not consider me a coward, but I am primarily concerned about my children!
      2. +3
        14 December 2015 13: 05
        Quote: Uranus
        Well, of course. Egypt is losing the tour stream. it’s not beneficial for them to claim that this is a terrorist attack.

        Their Wishlist now have no meaning. The President of Russia has publicly stated that this was an unambiguous act of terrorism and forbade, for security reasons, the travel of Russian citizens to Egypt. So increase the level of security of certain categories of foreigners, comrades Egyptians. And then, perhaps, you will be happy.
      3. 0
        14 December 2015 14: 06
        About the flow tour is to the vein. Now let them take the stream of Turks.
    2. +1
      14 December 2015 12: 56
      But, again, everyone remembers that it was Egypt who first declared that it was a terrorist attack. So, that is not as simple as the author wants to say.
  2. +1
    14 December 2015 12: 52
    Well, they really want to return tourists from Russia, already I won’t keep it.
  3. Tor5
    0
    14 December 2015 12: 52
    Well then, they could not identify traces of explosives?
    1. +2
      14 December 2015 13: 02
      Quote: Tor5
      traces of explosives could not be detected?

      And if she really wasn’t? Then there is a thuja heap of questions .......
      Let the Egyptians lie, so it’s calmer.
      1. 0
        14 December 2015 19: 25
        I don’t think it was profitable for us to prove the terrorist attack without proof. After all, Egypt is also not the last horseradish to unreasonably ride it, knowing what damage it will be. Let me remind you that, in contrast to bourgeois, we did not cancel flights immediately.
    2. 0
      14 December 2015 13: 08
      Do they need it?
    3. +1
      14 December 2015 13: 11
      Until they make a full-scale calculation of all the elements, analyze the damage to them, and conduct the relevant examinations, it is impossible to say whether or not it was firm or impossible with 100% accuracy. At high altitude, a large amount of exposure is not required, the volume of explosives in the bank is enough for the eyes. The plane will fall apart from a sharp pressure drop, as in school experience with a balloon that bursts from low external pressure and large internal. Thus, damage to the elements will be minor.
      1. 0
        14 December 2015 15: 31
        I agree.
        The plane fell apart in the air - the tail fell several kilometers from the plane itself. The bodies of people that fell out of it are also far away. In addition, the plane had previously had an emergency takeoff - a tail hitting the runway during takeoff. A small but sharp jolt (explosion) during the flight (it will not ride in the parking lot) in the area near the tail is enough. And to make a bomb - after walking through Khoztovaty for half an hour and no one swells such ...
  4. +1
    14 December 2015 12: 54
    Is it possible, even in such a tragedy, to falsify the facts? There is no limit to human hypocrisy ...
    1. +2
      14 December 2015 16: 12
      Quote: moskowit
      Is it possible, even in such a tragedy, to falsify the facts?

      the outskirts did go when they shot down an airplane over the Black Sea. so still have not pleaded guilty
  5. +5
    14 December 2015 13: 01
    There are some drawbacks, but I'll write: it is also unprofitable for our fat bellies to shout that the plane simply fell apart in the air due to poor-quality repairs. Simply because our fat bellies benefit from continuing to buy used aircraft. It is also beneficial to continue to lease / sell substandard aircraft to our "partners" from Europe and the USA. For such money they can buy anyone.
    1. +5
      14 December 2015 13: 13
      The plane, even though the "fifth point" and had enough concrete during operation in the Middle East and Asian companies, but it was repaired in Toulouse, on "mommy", Airbus, and not artisanal raccoons in Muh-Al-El-S.r.a.n.s .k.e.
      For the sake of interest, Signor Tomato, look at the statistics on how many disasters of the A-320 / 321 family of liners were. This is one of the most reliable cars in the world. Americans are resting. I do not put a minus in principle.
      1. +2
        14 December 2015 13: 36
        .... The plane even had a "fifth point" and had enough concrete ...

        ... This does not mean anything .... ALL aircraft provide for reinforcement of the structure in the area of ​​the "fifth point" for such cases, up to the installation of a retractable heel .... If the touch does not fall off the tail and the geometry does not "crawl", it's quite an aircraft ... hi
      2. 0
        14 December 2015 15: 37
        The plane fell apart in the air - the tail fell several kilometers from the plane itself. The bodies of people that fell out of it are also far away. In addition, the plane had previously had an emergency takeoff - a tail hitting the runway during takeoff. A small but sharp jolt (explosion) during the flight (it will not ride in the parking lot) in the area near the tail is enough. And to make a bomb - after walking through Khoztovaty for half an hour and no one swells such ...
    2. +1
      14 December 2015 18: 21
      and tour operators, with their billions of dollars in turnover, can they benefit from a ban? Especially after Turkey? But it’s not real ... they just benefit from an accident, they changed the carrier and that's it
  6. 0
    14 December 2015 13: 08
    Some authoritative sources write that in the airplane’s body, the photo clearly shows holes that occur only from missiles ...
    Well it is, note. And so in general it was a terrorist attack of course, yes.
  7. +1
    14 December 2015 13: 09
    "A few days later, the director of the FSB, Alexander Bortnikov, announced that the cause of the disaster was a terrorist act - an explosive device was detonated on board the airliner."
    If memory serves these "few days" lasted quite a long time. Not understandable "body movements".
    1. +1
      14 December 2015 13: 16
      Memory does not change. I am not a connoisseur of international law, but most likely the question is who will pay compensation, depending on whether it is a terrorist attack or not.
  8. 0
    14 December 2015 13: 17
    Mochilovo igilovtsev is taking big steps and to some in the world oh how unprofitable it is to lose the feeder that they have with the help of this rotten igil. And so that at least somehow to stop the igil massacre (and RUSSIA just just made a bloody igil and am terrible slaughter) they now put pressure on the next group of Egypt so that they would not find evidence of a terrorist attack on board an airplane! But it’s I who can misunderstand something and the course of my thoughts is wrong what ...
  9. +1
    14 December 2015 13: 21
    Quote: FIREMAN
    I am not an expert on international law, but most likely the question is who will pay compensation, depending on whether it is a terrorist attack or not.

    I just thought, the question - who will pay, is not the same as - who is to blame. Lately, many are hiding behind the words - "The dead cannot be returned"
    1. +1
      14 December 2015 13: 44
      I am so, "about memory". 4.10.2001. Black Sea. Tu-154M, airborne RA-85693, Tel Aviv - Tolmachevo.
      "In 2008, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine initiated an examination. The expert commission included six specialists from the Kiev Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Examination (KNIISE) and three employees of the Kharkiv Institute of Air Force named after Kozhedub. According to the repeated examination of the KNIISE from January 2011, the plane was not hit The experts studied the conditions under which, according to the conclusions of the IAC, the Tu-154 could be hit by a missile.The commission concluded that during the detonation of the missile's warhead, the distance to the aircraft should have been 780 m. would be “up to three submunitions.” “Destruction of the aircraft under such conditions is practically impossible,” the KNIISE concludes. The report also says that the Reis target was destroyed three minutes before the Tu-154 disaster by the fire of another anti-aircraft missile system - S-300 PS, located 11 km from the S-200V. At 9.42 UTC (at 12.42 Kiev time) The radiation from the C-200V radar equipment was detected, which excludes the possibility of a Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile hitting the plane. Denying the defeat of the aircraft by the Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile, the experts of KNIISE do not indicate other possible reasons for the crash of the Tu-154. Answering questions during the court hearings, the experts did not rule out that the source of the plane's destruction could be located both outside and inside the airliner, in particular, an explosive device placed “between the ceiling of the inside of the plane” and its outer shell ”.
      And now we carefully read the performance characteristics of the C-200. From the words of the "commission" the impression is that the missile was stuffed with "plastic" submunitions. Those who studied at the Air Defense Higher Educational Institutions during the Soviet era remember very well what the 200s were intended for, especially under the states' program "Giant Spear", and what they did in the Arctic (even without special charges).
      And one more thing ... Even the first two-tiers worked according to the principle "the stronger the target radiation, the better we aim."
  10. +1
    14 December 2015 13: 24
    Apparently, authoritative members of the commission investigating the tragedy of flight MH-17 were invited to investigate ...
    Someone said - "There is no limit to human hypocrisy ...", there is one measure of $$$.
    And when it comes to it, the rest is not important, all the more so for a rather poor country, in which not a small share of the budget are receipts from tourism. Not to mention the "international solidarity" towards Russia, in the application of completely different standards and rules. IMHO
  11. +1
    14 December 2015 13: 31
    All this churkota is so slippery that I don’t even want to talk
  12. 0
    14 December 2015 13: 35
    Interestingly, the Egyptian experts themselves came to this conclusion or who suggested ...
  13. +1
    14 December 2015 13: 36
    In any case, alternative versions are considered, justifications are given in favor or against each version (hypothesis). The final document of the commission of inquiry contains the final conclusion. This is a legal fact. The rest are hypotheses. The Poles are still speculating about the causes of the disaster in Smolensk. However, experts are confident that the reasons are established by an act of the commission.
  14. 0
    14 December 2015 13: 36
    In Egypt, accustomed to the New Year to receive large profits from Russian tourists. Now let them first get rid of ISIS, and only then it will be possible to talk with them.
    1. 0
      14 December 2015 13: 54
      Al_oriso,
      Does your phrase remind you of an old thought: "Rock against drugs, bees against honey"?
  15. 0
    14 December 2015 13: 39
    We read carefully!

    Reuters news agency, citing representatives of the Egyptian investigation team, reports ...

    According to Reuters, the Egyptian side declares ...


    We look forward to an official investigation reading articles from all sorts of Galyn Times.
  16. 0
    14 December 2015 13: 45
    The Egyptians are completely overwhelmed! Conclusions on the terrorist act were not only not made, but still have the audacity to deny! For them, the main thing is to tear the bakshish from Russian tourists! Our tour operators are also good! Recently an article was published that in January February, tourists can visit Egypt again! That the Egyptians have already eliminated everything in terms of security! And what now will the inspection of tourists become more thorough at the airport? Now they’ll bring it to the airport and pickle there longer? What will it give us in terms of security if everyone has access to airplanes in the same charm? And I hope everyone knows about the carelessness of local Aboriginal people and their pathological greed! Arabs, did not guess .... Personally, I with my whole family in Egypt more than a foot!
  17. 0
    14 December 2015 14: 09
    It just says that our specialists work better and more efficiently)
  18. 0
    14 December 2015 14: 13
    Right now I'll pick a chamomile and guess .......
  19. 0
    14 December 2015 14: 27
    There is always an alternative version (as possible an alternative reality). As a point of view you can listen. As they say, whoever is looking for something will find it.
  20. +1
    14 December 2015 15: 55
    In fact, official conclusions are not made from scratch! Egyptian findings seem simply not serious. They may be hottz tourists, but they don’t know what to think of!
  21. +2
    14 December 2015 16: 08
    Quote: cniza
    They need to quickly clean up and guarantee safety, then the tourists will return.

    oh how soon. ours may return quickly (the mysterious Russian soul), but foreigners ...
  22. 0
    14 December 2015 20: 20
    As soon as the version was confirmed that there would be a strong blow to the tourist industry and the inflow of capital, the version of the terrorist attack was not immediately confirmed.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"