Military Review

Vitaly Churkin believes that the American coalition’s strikes against the SAR forces were not accidental.

36
Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN Security Council, Vitaly Churkin, stated that the two strikes inflicted by the American coalition planes on the military personnel of the Syrian government army may not be accidental and not the only ones. Vitaly Churkin believes that the American coalition can “miss” past DAISh terrorists and strike at the positions and targets of the SAR armed forces in the near future.


Vitaly Churkin believes that the American coalition’s strikes against the SAR forces were not accidental.


RIA News gives a fragment of the statement of the Russian permanent representative to the UN Security Council:
There is a danger here: the members of this coalition are different, as it turned out, in some chaos: someone in the coalition framework is bombing, someone, such as Turkey, is bombing outside the coalition framework. And, of course, there is a suspicion that it was no coincidence that, despite all the assurances given to the Syrian government that these attacks would not be done by the forces of the Syrian government, from time to time they would be dealt with in some places. And this will cause aggravation and further complicate the plot of what is happening in Syria. But let's hope that this does not happen.

At the same time, Vitaly Churkin said that the United States in the fight against the fighters DAISH (ISIL) proposed "to tune in for a long term."

Russian diplomat:
This conversation with the American generals at the Pentagon was very interesting. They said that there would be a big struggle, we are setting ourselves up for the long term. Some colleagues were simply dumbfounded - how could that be? Listen, there are not so many of them. You bombed the year there, the whole world took up arms, and you say that it is not known when this struggle will be over ?!


Indeed, a strange situation ... With the use of giant military resources, including military aircraft for various purposes of the USA, Australia, Germany, France, Turkey, other countries, as well as US special forces in Iraq, Turkish troops in the same Iraq, the so-called American coalition can do nothing sensible to counter the militants who have of the most powerful weapons - anti-aircraft installation on a Japanese-made SUV and armored vehicles seized from the Syrian army ...

Vitaly Churkin:
I also asked them a simple question: do they theoretically have at least a rough estimate of how to use the armed forces of the Assad government if there is a political process? But they did not answer. As I understand it, they do not even have theoretical reflections on this matter. Of course, logic is on our side. Everyone says that it is impossible to win without land forces, and no one is going to supply these land forces from leading countries - neither we, nor the Americans, nor the French, nor the British. If you are not going to, then it is necessary to use local ground forces. And who is this? These scattered "moderate" groups? This is not enough to defeat ISIS. So, we need to attract the forces of the Assad government. But they (the Americans - approx. "IN") for this is not yet ready. The position of the West is that they do not even want to hint that they will cooperate with Assad.


So they are not going to hint. They have completely different tasks, which Vitaly Churkin himself declared - to continue to imitate the fight against terrorism, while slyly striking the positions of the SAR forces. This is the whole "coalition" ...
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vend
    Vend 14 December 2015 12: 30
    18
    It is difficult to disagree with this statement. This was seen on our forum by many.
    1. iouris
      iouris 14 December 2015 12: 35
      +8
      It’s good that the Foreign Ministry is reading our forum.
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 14 December 2015 12: 48
        +7
        Quote: iouris
        It’s good that the Foreign Ministry is reading our forum.

        Diplomats don’t go to bed right and can’t eat quietly until they read the VO forum. Where else can we get such an array of highly professional analytics and useful tips?
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 14 December 2015 14: 11
          +5
          From the text of the article
          conversation with American generals at the Pentagon was very interesting. They said that there will be a big fight, tune in for the long run
          members of this coalition are differentas it turned out, some randomness ... there is a suspicion that this not by chance ... that, despite all the assurances given to the Syrian government - that these attacks will NOT be delivered to the forces of the Syrian government - from time to time they will be applied in some places against them.

          All this, as in the Russian fairy tale "How Fox shared cheese" two cubs.
          The cubs were lucky - they found a large head of cheese (OIL) and began to divide it among themselves. And Fox (USA) right there with her services (the military coalition) imposed on the cubs to divide the cheese equally - in all fairness, that means. Fox began to divide the cheese - yes, it divides it so that it does not work equally (not in fairness) all the time. And right there Fox eliminates her mistake - she again bites off a piece of a larger piece of cheese and immediately eats the bitten piece herself (she takes her interest in sharing OIL). And the cubs are still waiting for Lisa to finally get even pieces of cheese. So the Fox ate all the cheese, leaving the stupid cubs each with a massive, identical piece of cheese - and SATYA went "home". That was the end of it.
          That is why American generals are tuning in for a LONG-TERM perspective, because with stolen ISIS in Syria, US oil has its SHARE in oil and its other interest.
          1. trantor
            trantor 14 December 2015 16: 49
            +2
            Quote: Tatiana
            All this, as in the Russian fairy tale "How Fox shared cheese"

            Thank. Sometimes, the analogy is much clearer than a detailed and reasoned analysis. smile
      2. Vend
        Vend 14 December 2015 12: 48
        +3
        Quote: iouris
        It’s good that the Foreign Ministry is reading our forum.

        I think this is another matter)) just a provocation is sewn with white thread. The forum gives an analysis and an assumption immediately. And diplomats pause. For greater efficiency.
        1. cniza
          cniza 14 December 2015 13: 01
          +5
          Quote: Wend
          Quote: iouris
          It’s good that the Foreign Ministry is reading our forum.

          I think this is another matter)) just a provocation is sewn with white thread. The forum gives an analysis and an assumption immediately. And diplomats pause. For greater efficiency.


          Already lazy to such an extent that they can’t even do a provocation, but why didn’t they say it to us ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain 14 December 2015 12: 37
      13
      Quote: serg1970
      Churkin, of course, well done. I would not be able to throw beads in front of pigs for so long and seemingly calm.

      Vitaly, unfortunately, is a warrior alone in the field, oh, and he wants to knock all the mattress coalitioners on the head, but he is a diplomat and forced to speak politely.
    3. Chicot 1
      Chicot 1 14 December 2015 12: 45
      +3
      U.S. coalition attacks on SAR were not accidental

      Quote: Wend
      It is difficult to disagree with this statement

      There is no accident in politics ...
    4. Tor5
      Tor5 14 December 2015 12: 47
      +6
      Unfortunately, this is not just an imitation of the fight against daish, it is a struggle against the Assad army.
    5. Uran
      Uran 14 December 2015 12: 50
      +2
      originally said. that the us bombing is not accidental. it is their policy. everyone knows why they are bombing. they have quite a few intelligence services there, including drones. and space intelligence management. they bomb precisely for those purposes. that verified
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 14 December 2015 12: 31
    +4
    Mericatos & Co. will never do for the good!

    Only to the detriment! This is their law in life.
  3. kodxnumx
    kodxnumx 14 December 2015 12: 31
    +2
    Churkin knows what he is saying, and if he said things from the UN rostrum, it means so!
  4. serg1970
    serg1970 14 December 2015 12: 32
    +3
    Churkin, of course, well done. I would not be able to throw beads in front of pigs for so long and seemingly calm.
    1. novobranets
      novobranets 14 December 2015 13: 00
      18
      Hats off to Churkin. He has no nerves, but steel cables.
  5. ibu355yandex.ru
    ibu355yandex.ru 14 December 2015 12: 32
    +3
    The strategic task of the American coalition is the overthrow of Assad! For this, ISIS was created by them. Everything else is a bluff !!!
  6. linen
    linen 14 December 2015 12: 33
    +2
    The US specifically struck at the army of SYRIA !!!!
  7. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 14 December 2015 12: 33
    +2
    To shoot down one such "nanosilnik" by the forces of the Syrian air defense will no longer be used.
    1. TVM - 75
      TVM - 75 14 December 2015 15: 32
      0
      This is the only right decision!
  8. Woodman
    Woodman 14 December 2015 12: 34
    +1
    So no one doubts this ... Now, if the Syrians had a normal cover, then these strikes would not have happened.
  9. knn54
    knn54 14 December 2015 12: 37
    +1
    How to bring down "accidentally" -taken for Turkish.
  10. Altona
    Altona 14 December 2015 12: 38
    0
    Air Force koalas are not sharpened to fight ISIS, their real goal is to crush Assad ...
    1. Signore Tomato
      Signore Tomato 14 December 2015 12: 54
      +3
      Assad has nothing to do with it! Assad promised to leave if the United States leaves and picks up his jackals from Daesh, but the United States is not interested, they need the whole territory of Syria.
  11. Svarog5570
    Svarog5570 14 December 2015 12: 50
    +2
    The Americans have everything by chance and they also miss regularly, especially for those for whom they wish.
  12. Signore Tomato
    Signore Tomato 14 December 2015 12: 53
    +2
    The trouble is that the US / Daesh does not need Syria as a state at all. They are not interested in transformations in Syria, whatever they may be. They just need the very territory of Syria - as a source of fossil resources. The United States decided to turn the whole world into its own colony and began with Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Syria, Iraq.
  13. Lawrence
    Lawrence 14 December 2015 12: 59
    +2
    Attacks on Assad’s troops should be considered a direct threat to the Russian air forces.
  14. gg.na
    gg.na 14 December 2015 12: 59
    +1
    Here’s urinating angry there all of them are Vitaliy! There he is good MAN!!! I definitely good yes I'm proud !!! Correctly on all fronts it is necessary to crush all the scum !!! am
  15. Victor-M
    Victor-M 14 December 2015 13: 00
    +2
    So they are not going to hint. They have completely different tasks, which Vitaly Churkin himself announced - to continue to imitate the fight against terrorism, silently striking at the positions of the SAR Armed Forces. This is the whole "coalition" ...

    I wonder if the West used to be different? Their whole worthless story is built on falsehood and imitation of the achievements with which they covered the looting of other countries, due to which they kept afloat.
  16. ochakow703
    ochakow703 14 December 2015 13: 03
    +2
    So it is necessary to hammer them into oblivion, they simply do not understand the other. Why are they allowed to fly over Syria, and our Turks immediately flunked. A disgrace. Once you got involved in a fight, you have to stand to the end.
  17. inferno_nv
    inferno_nv 14 December 2015 13: 04
    0
    Where logic ends - chaos begins! hi
  18. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 14 December 2015 13: 12
    +2
    The pepper is clear. The second time - this is no longer an accident, it is more like a pattern.
    In general, Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov, Vitaly Ivanovich Churkin, Maria Vladimirovna Zakharova, Vladimir Alekseevich Chizhov and many other employees of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are our weapons of no less caliber than missiles of the same name.
  19. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 14 December 2015 13: 19
    +1
    Churkin:
    I also asked them a simple question.

    "But they didn't answer."
    "... they" are not ready for this yet. "
    "... they don't even want to hint ..."

    Conclusion: "they" simply ignore Churkin.
  20. Gor-1974
    Gor-1974 14 December 2015 13: 20
    +1
    If it is true they say that in connection with the mystery of glaciers, the level of the world ocean rises, which in the future will cause a change in the visible land area, then of course even oil (not to mention Syria) fade into the background. The war is going on for the land above the "sea" level. If this is true, but it is necessary to "solve" with everyone the question of who, like "rats from the ship", will run at the first leak. And you don't have to listen to them, do business with them, let alone be friends, you couldn't create the world before the flood, let them build arks.
  21. rudolff
    rudolff 14 December 2015 14: 00
    +2
    Strange situation. Regarding the second airstrike on the positions of the Syrian army, our people seemed to admit that they were not Americans. They were bombed in the same province, but half a hundred kilometers away. But directly in the area of ​​the incident were two pairs of aircraft of "other" members of the coalition. The question is what? Our people seem to know, but they are silent. Why? Why would there be such delicacy? Couldn't the French have distinguished themselves? "Allies" after all ... For the Israelis, there seemed to be no targets. Turks do not fly yet.
  22. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 14 December 2015 14: 24
    0
    IS militants and "moderates" have one and the same enemy that the US-led coalition has common goals, in reality they are on the same side.
  23. afrikanez
    afrikanez 14 December 2015 15: 40
    0
    From the coalition side, the fight against terrorists is more like the reproduction and strengthening of IS militants, but not like destruction. am
  24. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 14 December 2015 15: 57
    0
    It’s necessary to drive this coalition from there with sticks so that the spirit doesn’t have to. One has to babysit these or woe warriors or dirty tricks!