On December 18, the laying of the nuclear submarine carrier Emperor Alexander III is scheduled for the Russian Navy

The representative of the press service of the main defense department of Russia on the Naval the fleet Igor Dygalo told the media that on December 18, a solemn laying ceremony of the nuclear submarine rocket carrier Emperor Alexander III of the Borey-A project is scheduled. The event will be held in Severodvinsk. Submarine cruisers of the Borey-A project are capable of carrying 16 Bulava-30 ICBMs on board.

Press office fleet:

The ceremony will be attended by representatives of the leadership of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the main command of the Navy, the command of the Northern Fleet and the White Sea naval base, representatives of the administration of the Arkhangelsk region and Severodvinsk. The three nuclear submarines of this project, Prince Vladimir, Prince Oleg, Generalissimus Suvorov, are already at various stages of construction on the stocks of OAO Sevmash.

It should be noted that the head submarine of the project "Borey-A" "Prince Vladimir" was laid 30 July 2012 of the year. At the moment, there is a slipway period. The second submarine of the project (the first serial) - "Prince Oleg." Her bookmark date is 27 July 2014 of the year. The third submarine missile cruiser "Generalissimo Suvorov" began to be built on the Sevmash 26 December last year.

The project “Borey-A” became the development of the project “Borey”. The development of nuclear-powered submarine missile cruisers is conducted in St. Petersburg at OAO TsBB MT Rubin.

Comments

[Atrix]

The news is of course super. But damn if it had been built for a year and a half, it would have been even better.

[Nevsky_ZU]

Quote: Atrix

The news is of course super. But damn if it had been built for a year and a half, it would have been even better.

If they manage in three years, it will still be very good.

[Kars]

Is it interesting that there are no other names? And when Alexander 3 was mentioned, the battleship that immediately died in Tsushima pops up in memory. Already Makarov would have been named after the admiral (even though he also died there)

[inkass_98]

There is another analogy, it seems to me: Alexander III Peacemaker.
And also: "the ambassador can wait while the Russian tsar is catching fish."

[Gronsky]

Maybe I’m wrong, but somehow the rumor is overly pathos in the names of the new SSBNs.
Emperor, prince, etc. Although, "Generalissimo Suvorov" sounds good, sharp, like a shot, which is organic with regard to weapons. I think the titles in the title are not always appropriate. Much more appropriate just the name and surname. Remember the cruiser "Mikhail Kutuzov" - short and beautiful. And most importantly, no one needs to explain who it is and in what rank.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: Kars

Already the name of the admiral, even if they called Makarov (even though he also died there)

The 3rd frigate of project 11356 was named after Admiral Makarov, he was launched in the fall in Kaliningrad

[McLuha-MacLeod]

Man, you don’t know the story at all

[H - ck 61]

Makarov died in Potr Arthur

[Kars]

Quote: McLooka-MacLeod

Man, you don’t know the story at all

as you wish

Quote: N - ck 61

Makarov died in Potr Arthur

Well, at least in the Russian-Japanese war and in the Far East?

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Kars

It is interesting that there are no other names?

Kars, you think up names in your own Ukraine, or you called the plane Bandera. You don’t like the history of Russia, it's your difficulties.

[Kars]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Kars, you think up names in your own Ukraine, or you called the plane Bandera. You don’t like the history of Russia, it's your difficulties.

Is it an attempt to insult or incite hatred between the nat? And for reference, I do not like or like the history of Russia. I am particularly interested in the armored fleet 1880-1945

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Kars

is it an attempt to insult or incite hatred between nat?

Is a Bandera airplane an insult or incitement to hatred? -This is the modern validity of your state.

Quote: Kars

And for reference, I do not like or like the history of Russia

Then what are the claims to the name?

[Kars]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Is a Bandera airplane an insult or incitement to hatred?

An appeal to me in such a tone by the moderator. Provoke me to solder another five warnings?

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Then what are the claims to the name?

For a submarine, take the name of the sunken ship. Bad symbolism. It’s better to really use saints.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Kars

. Provoke me to solder another five warnings?

Wow, and even YOU and this is Kars, don’t make a girl of yourself.

[Kars]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

ay, and even YOU, and this is Kars, don’t make a girl of yourself.

Should I ask you not to make yourself a moderator? And I don’t remember that I would contact you. Although everything is possible. I remember the time someone waved pictures of money and talked about the number of cards. And Armats to me on the shelf not)))

[iouris]

We will all be there. Some earlier, others later.

[78bor1973]

They try not to name the ships who died due to accidents (not in battle) and this battleship died heroically like the Varyag in Chemulpo, so everything is normal!

[volodimer]

And I think it's not a sin to name a hero ship. According to the reviews of the same Englishmen (who were present in the Japanese squadron), the battle was lost by 45 minutes, but these EBRs (Prince Suvorov, Alexander III, Borodino) fought bravely for several more hours and died without surrendering. Their feat is no less heroic than the feat of the "Varyag". With EBR, Prince Suvorov was saved only by the headquarters (at the very beginning), everyone died on "Alexander III", and one was saved from "Borodino". By the way, S.O. Makarov did not die in Tsushima. I would call the entire series of ships, like those EBRs, they deserve everything. And of course, one should not forget about "Admiral Makarov".

[Tor5]

I want to believe that they build quality.

[Laksamana besar]

About 4,5-5 years according to plan from the bookmark to the flag raising, but it is significantly lower than the first Boreas were built.

[Anton Gavrilov]

A year and a half? About0

Sorry, but what are you doing?

[Cormorants]

Yeah, this is just great news))

[Anton Gavrilov]

For reference, such a large and complex ship as an atomic submarine strategic missile carrier is being built in Europe and the United States 10 years, only very little less will be built with us - Prince Vladimir will be taken out approximately in 2017, they began to build in 2009, + at least six months completion will be afloat, that is, 8,5-9 will be for sure.

[Ami du peuple]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

For reference, such a large and complex ship, as an atomic submarine strategic missile carrier, is being built in Europe and the United States for about 10 years

How many?! US class submarines "Ohio" similar to "Borey" were built, on average, three of the year. Yes, and our "Sharks" - the largest SSBNs, were built in almost the same period. Don't talk nonsense, dear.

[vovanpain]

Quote: Atrix

The news is of course super. But damn if it had been built for a year and a half, it would have been even better.

I agree with you that the news is very cool, but with the timing of the construction, you obviously got excited.

[Amurets]

Quote: vovanpain

I agree with you that the news is very cool, but with the timing of the construction, you obviously got excited.

Here are the construction dates for the RPKSN 667BDRM project;
boat number. bookmark. launching. entry into operation.
K-51 23.02.1981/01.84/29.12.84 XNUMX XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX
K-84 11.83 12.84. 02.85.
K-64 11.84/12.85/02.86 XNUMX XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX
K-114 12.85 09.86 01.87.
K-117 09.86. 09.87. 03.88.
K-18 09.87. 11.88. 09.89.
K-407 11.88. 10.89. 20.02.1992/XNUMX/XNUMX
Reference book "Submarines of Russia." V. Ilyin. A. Kolesnikov. 2006. The Sevmash plant knew how to build quickly. And calculate the terms of construction yourself.

[Evgeniy667b]

In the USSR, 1970 SSBNs were put into operation in the year (1982-6), in Severodvinsk and Komsomolsk on the Amur. Moreover, Krasnoye Sormovo worked on nuclear submarines.

[Saburo]

Even Americans spend an average of three years on their Virginia. And then they reached such a pace after the fourteenth boat in the series. For example, the parent Virginia was built for almost ten years.
On the Ohio, they spent an average of three to four years.

[trantor]

Quote: Atrix

if it were still built in a year or a half

Well, you and mahanuli;)
In terms of costs - it’s a small but full-fledged city to build - spend so much money during this time and on the area of ​​one shipyard?

[Yorgven]

I read the "bookmark of a nuclear aircraft carrier" already choked ...

[wow]

Good luck ! Otherwise, it doesn’t work out in any way !!!

[Gormenghast]

Bookmark dates are respected. The main thing is that it should not be delayed with the construction periods, as with the first of the series.

Glitter and poverty ... "Sharks"was launched 3,5 years after laying.

[Anton Gavrilov]

It will be delayed, even as it is delayed, and it is already stretching now. Until the 20 year, the fleet will receive only 2-3 of such ships, instead of the promised 5. This is most likely 2.

[Sergey Trifonov]

More optimism Anton Gavrilov.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Sergey Trifonov

More optimism Anton Gavrilov.

I really hope that in the 16th year the MAPL Kazan will be finally launched. We are building Boreas, but it’s not clear and quiet with the Ash trees. Although it was agreed that the Ash trees will be built in the same series as the Boreas, but so far only one Severodvinsk furrows the world's oceans.

[Stirbjorn]

Yes, everything is sad, both with Ash-trees and with Boreas. In 2017, at best, someone will be commissioned. Or they can shift everything to the right again

[NEXUS]

Quote: Stirbjorn

Yes, everything is sad, both with Ash-trees and with Boreas. In 2017, at best, someone will be commissioned. Or they can shift everything to the right again

Shoigu said in a report that in the 16th year two multi-purpose submarines will be launched, but he did not say which ones ... God forbid, if one of them is Kazan.

[Anton Gavrilov]

3-4: Veliky Novgorod, Kolpino project 636.3, Kronstadt project 677, and perhaps Kazan 885M.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: NEXUS

Shoigu said in a report that in the 16th year two multi-purpose submarines will be launched, but he did not say which ones ... God forbid, if one of them is Kazan.

Even if there is one "Kazan" (and 2 diesels will be lowered anyway, Gavrilov is 100% right. Admiralty shipyards, together with Zelenodolsk, are the only ones who do not break the deadline), this does not mean that they will be put into operation, even in a year ... Already 11356 for which the project is worked out, and so far the flag has not been raised on any of them. Grigorovich, let me remind you, was launched in the spring of 2014, and Essen in the fall of the same year.

[Anton Gavrilov]

They will not accept anyone in the 2017. They will promise that the flag will be raised in Kazan, but in the end, it will be the same with Gorshkov and Grigorovich this year, quietly and smoothly, without too much noise, will float further to the 18, but how everything will turn out in 18, they will accept or it will not be ready yet time will tell.

[Laksamana besar]

Admiral Grigorovich in the Baltic graduated from the state. tests and has already gone to the training grounds of the Northern Fleet, where he will complete the latter, after which he will return to Yantar, where preparations for the transfer of the Russian Navy will take place. I hope that it will go into operation early next year.

[Anton Gavrilov]

Quote: Laksamana Besar

Admiral Grigorovich in the Baltic graduated from the state. trials

Nope, I haven’t finished yet, because he hasn’t shot yet from UKKS With TsU, and this is an extremely important test. Since UKKS there were only throwing launches, for now.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

In 2017, no one will be accepted.

In 17, they promise to launch the Belgorod nuclear submarine ... an interesting submarine. There are two opinions - the first: this is a 5th generation nuclear submarine and the second: it is a carrier submarine for the STATUS-6 program, and after that it will seem like Khabarovsk.

On December 20, 2012, in workshop No. 55 of PO "Sevmash" (Severodvinsk) on Project 09852, the SSGN K-139 "Belgorod" Project 949AM (factory # 664) was re-laid. As of mid-2015, work on the re-equipment of the submarine continues and the readiness of the boat is predicted no earlier than 2016-2017.

There are several options for the hypothetical use of the new launch boat:
1. The official version is that the carrier boat will carry one or more manned deep-sea rescue vehicles and several autonomous unmanned vehicles. The latter are likely to be located at the site of missile launchers of SSGN 949A.
2. Hypothetical version - the carrier boat will carry a nuclear deep-sea station of the type pr.10831 or the type of prospective pr.18510M. It is possible that in this case, a watch will be installed in the PLASN case in the niche of which the means of docking and servicing the wearable AGS will be placed.
3. PLA will be the carrier of the dual-use complex "Magma"

[Anton Gavrilov]

Belgorod is generally originally a submarine of the 949 project, how can it be the 5 generation then?)

Even 09851 is pure 4.))

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

Belgorod is generally originally a submarine of the 949 project, how can it be the 5 generation then?)

The fact of the matter is that there is too much secrecy and rumors around this boat. I do not claim that Belgorod is a 5th generation nuclear submarine, but I say that there is such an opinion. The same incomprehensible story with Khabarovsk. 8 series submarines were reduced by 7, reloading Belgorod. In general, a lot of fog was released ...

[Anton Gavrilov]

Yes and more pull down and accepting the fleet is still different things.

More or less stable and massive new nuclear boats will go only in the area of ​​20

[Anton Gavrilov]

Well, there.

In Kazan, next year, in spring, the docking should finish, accept electrical power at the end of the year, installation and electrical installation for the most part should also finish the next year, well, God forbid.

Installation work will gradually unfold in Novosibirsk, God forbid, a compartment or two is joined together.

In Krasnoyarsk, they should finish supplying the PC sections and finish the hydraulic tests, the hydraulic ones should start this month, but we live in Russia, everything went right .... And far away, alas, as far as I can tell for obvious reasons, but this is a solid parts of 1 of the year ....

Next year they should start working normally in Arkhangelsk, but now, in fact, there it was, just as it was when laying the section of the 1 compartment, it’s still lonely ....

[Anton Gavrilov]

On the NSR as a whole, priority No. 1 is the 955 project, hence the corresponding allocation of resources, except perhaps for money, here they are regularly allocated for everything.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

On the NSR as a whole, priority No. 1 is the 955 project, hence the corresponding allocation of resources, except perhaps for money, here they are regularly allocated for everything.

It’s not clear why the priority is given to 955 (Borey) project, and not 885 (Ash). Boreas are simply missile carriers designed for a retaliatory missile strike, and Ash is a multi-purpose submarine carrying, by the way, Liner missiles, which are no less long-range than Bulava.

[Anton Gavrilov]

Ash carrying Liner? О0 This is something new. Ash carries Caliber with Onyx. Well, this means that our leadership gives higher priority to nuclear forces than to more traditional ones.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

Ash carrying Liner? О0 This is something new. Ash carries Caliber with Onyx. Well, this means that our leadership gives higher priority to nuclear forces than to more traditional ones.

I know about Onyxes and Caliber ... and about Liners, sclerosis seems to let me down. The Liner replaces Sineva, which they put on Dolphins. And for some reason I decided that the Liner should be put on Yaseni. Sorry, for the inaccuracy and thanks for the amendment.

[Anton Gavrilov]

One must be a realist, not an optimist first things first!

If you approach all things with realism and do everything accordingly, then there will be more joy in the end!

[abrakadabre]

I wonder why it is impossible to rebuild 1-2 boats, which have exhausted their resource as a warship, for the needs of "oceanography"? At one time, how many large surface "oceanographic" ships were built ...

[aszzz888]

Well, that's good.

Again - to the mericatos for joy!

[MaxGerb]

great, great news day after day.

the year before last (~) aviation
last week 2 boats for the World Cup passed.
on this tab the missile carrier
what to expect from next weeks? )))

great pace!

[gg.na]

Quote: Atrix

The news is of course super. But damn if it had been built for a year and a half, it would have been even better.

Haste is needed when catching fleas and diarrhea! Such as this missile carrier you just need to do with a sense of a good arrangement, but hurry to make people laugh!

[Alexey-74]

Excellent! The news, as always, tickles the nerves of our "partners" from the Tan and NATO. And what sonorous names: "Prince Oleg", "Prince Vladimir" "Suvorov" !!!

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Alexey-74

And what sonorous names: "Prince Oleg", "Prince Vladimir" "Suvorov" !!!

Returning to the Empire Communists stroke hello. Not Lenin, not Trotsky, but "Emperor Alexander III"

[Mera joota]

Oh and bad karma of this name ... The previous carrier died with the whole crew ...

[sisa29]

Squadron battleship "Alexander III", assigned to the Russian Guard - the Guards naval crew, after damaging the "Suvorov" first followed the out of order flagship, but then independently led the squadron. Acting for only 25 minutes as the leader of the Alexander III squadron, after carrying out a counter-maneuver under the stern of the Togo battleship detachment, he gave the Russian squadron a respite, and he himself came under longitudinal fire from the Kamimura battleships. At 2 hours 40 minutes. severely beaten by the fire of Japanese armored cruisers, he gave up his place to Borodino and entered the wake of Sisoyu the Great. According to the testimony of cap. 2 rubles. Semyonov - "... in the middle of the ruins of the navigating bridge, surrounded by a raging fire, leaning on the miraculously survived rails, several officers stood and smoked - - - the guard!".
At about 5 pm "Alexander III" went out of action with a big fire and a roll to the starboard side, occasionally firing from the guns on the left side. Armored cruisers adm. The Kamimura immediately shifted their fire to him, although there was no longer any need. The battleship was dying. From the raised port side, the team threw themselves into the water, the starboard side quickly went into the water and 20-30 people moved quickly across it. Having overturned, the battleship floated upside down for a long time. Hundreds of heads swam around. The cruiser "Izumrud" approached the crash site, dropped bunks, lifebuoys and belts, but was forced to withdraw by Japanese fire.
About 8 hours 15 minutes battleship Alexander III sank. No one escaped from the glorious ship. Together with the battleship, 29 officers, 11 conductors and 827 lower ranks were killed.

[Turner38]

As Marty McFly said- "History can be rewritten .."

[sisa29]

I do not want to agree with you. For example, if your grandfather died a hero during the war on the battlefield, would you name your son in honor of him?

[Stirbjorn]

"Varyag" how many were in the fleet

[Nick888]

Sounds so powerful ... Emperor Alexander III
And most importantly, the technology itself lives up to its name.

[Fei_Wong]

Quote: Kars

Is it interesting that there are no other names? And when Alexander 3 was mentioned, the battleship that immediately died in Tsushima pops up in memory. Already Makarov would have been named after the admiral (even though he also died there)

Makarov died not there, but at Port Arthur, with another attempt to break through the 1st squadron.
PS And speak "в Tsushima "is illiterate. Tsushima is an island. В the island our battleship could not die. He died or у Tsushima, or in / at Tsushima the battle.

[Kars]

Let me use the term Russo-Japanese War?

[ASG7]

But perhaps not 20 ICBMs will have or have already refused to expand.

[martin-159]

And I remembered the recipe for the Alexander 3 cocktail.

[dchegrinec]

A beautiful rocket carrier is a beautiful name! The main thing is that his fate be worthy! And our enemies trembled, as they say ..

[VohaAhov]

Quote: Kars

Is it interesting that there are no other names? And when Alexander 3 was mentioned, the battleship that immediately died in Tsushima pops up in memory. Already Makarov would have been named after the admiral (even though he also died there)

I also think that there are many other and very interesting names that are more suitable for "Boreas". For example "Andrew the First-Called". The name "George the Victorious" will be released soon. Or you can continue the princely series, for example, "Prince Rurik"
And "Admiral Makarov" is already there - this is the SKR project 11356, launched, being completed, next year for testing.

[Kars]

Quote: VohaAhov

And "Admiral Makarov" already exists

Makorov deserves a larger ship. The cruiser Marshal Ustinov would be nice to rename Makarov.

[Old26]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

For reference, such a large and complex ship, as an atomic submarine strategic missile carrier, is being built in Europe and the United States for about 10 years

Yah? Total TWO FRENCH BOATS from the moment of laying to the moment of entering the BS, they had a term of 10 and 11 years. The other two - 7 and 8
The English were built, respectively, 5, 6, 7 and 8 years
American type "Ohio":
- 7 years = 1 boat
- 6 years = 2 boats
- 5 years = 8 boats
- 4 years = 2 boats
- 3 years = 4 boats
- 2 years = 1 boat
Why do you conclude that about 10 years are being built ???

[Mikhail Krapivin]

The main thing is not to stop. There were enough worthy kings and queens in Russia; we must honor them all in this way.

[tokens2]

Will the surface fleet be replenished with new ships with the names of Russian tsars and princes?
Or is it exclusively the right of the underwater shield of the Motherland?
It is clear that destroyers and frigates are not named according to their status ... however, calibers from any "Peter 1 boat" can magically recreate literally unlimited status, which even a compass is not a hindrance.

[asiat_61]

I'm not a naval, it's hard for me to judge, but in R.I. at one time they did not give the ships their own names. It's just how the phrase will sound: "Admiral Nakhimov" drowned, ugh ugh ugh. In my opinion, somehow it is not very attractive.

[Old26]

Quote: asiat_61

I'm not a naval, it's hard for me to judge, but in R.I. at one time they did not give the ships their own names. It's just how the phrase will sound: "Admiral Nakhimov" drowned, ugh ugh ugh. In my opinion, somehow it is not very attractive.

In due time - this is when ?? All warships of the Russian Imperial Navy had their own names, including submarines. The exception was the so-called. "numbered destroyers"

[asiat_61]

A proper name and a name are two different things.

[Old26]

Quote: Lexi2

however, calibers from any "Peter 1 boat" can magically recreate literally unlimited status

How much in vain can you remember this "CALIBER" ??? Our "sworn friends" have thousands of such missiles, and hundreds of carriers. And we all remember the "Botik", then the "barge". As I understand it, before the appearance of the next from the point of view of "EXPERTS" Vynderwaffe. Start collecting materials on "Zircon", too, there will be a lot of screams about the new wunderwaffe

[tokens2]

Old26

How much in vain can you remember this "CALIBER" ???

Well, "VSUvat" caliber may not be sickly. Depending on the warhead.
The main caliber of battleships of the 20th century is known.
The "caliber" of the 21st century is also known.
But the fact that

the number of such missiles is in the thousands, and the carriers in the hundreds.

in the USA
This is all from the delusional ideas of global peace.

As I understand it, before the appearance of the next from the point of view of "EXPERTS" vynderwaffe

Do you dream about grandiose projects of aircraft carriers? Atomic large-tonnage ships? Worth as much as all medicine and education in Russia?
God forbid Russia take out such a yes and put a waffle.

Start collecting materials on "Zircon",

I'm not an Honduran intelligence agent
There are still enough calibers for our century.

And we all remember the "Botik", then the "barge".

Get from a "barge" caliber? An enchanting idea

[Termit1309]

Quote: Old26

How much in vain can you remember this "CALIBER" ??? Our "sworn friends" have thousands of such missiles, and hundreds of carriers.

Thanks to the Caliber, what was actually built in Russia from surface ships (MRS Buyan-m and Baltic corvettes) has at least some strategic value.

[Old26]

Quote: Lexi2

Well, "VSUvat" caliber may not be sickly. Depending on the warhead. The main caliber of battleships of the 20th century is known. The "caliber" of the 21st century is also known.

To whom? A country with an absent or weak air defense - easily. With strong air defense - the probability is zero or close to zero. Or comprehensively in a regional war, with the use of all forces and means. And then again, to a country with underdeveloped or outdated air defense.
They didn’t ask themselves the question, why the massive use of RS occurs in such conditions?

Quote: Lexi2

the United States is all from the delusional ideas of global peace

Do you prefer to have a dozen carriers and 2-3 hundreds of rockets? The presence of "Tomahawks" speaks not so much about the idea of ​​a global peace, but about the availability of an instrument to project their interests against countries that do not belong to the top twenty.

Quote: Lexi2

Are you dreaming of grandiose projects of aircraft carriers? Atomic large-tonnage ships? Worth as much as all medicine and education in Russia? God forbid Russia take these and put a waffle.

I don’t dream. But here at VO, as something new appears, so immediately, according to the ICSPERT, they become a prodigy. And everyone strives to put this system where it is necessary and where not. One of the writers really suggested having out on barges without thinking about everything else. Periodically, the CALIBER becomes such a waffle, then ISKANDER, then the electronic warfare system ... As they say here, I’ll say that the next wunderwaffe will be ZIRCON
He will be offered to put him on any vessel in turn, there will be offers to send him to Syria ...

Quote: Lexi2

I am not an agent of Honduran intelligence Caliber for our century is still enough

Let's see how much is enough for you. For a month or two.

Quote: Lexi2

Get from a "barge" caliber? An enchanting idea

Blessed is he who believes ...

Quote: Termit1309

Thanks to the Caliber, what was actually built in Russia from surface ships (MRS Buyan-m and Baltic corvettes) has at least some strategic value.

None of them has strategic value. Baltic corvettes are ships of the near sea zone, 2 ranks. And the serial ones are not worth the CALIBER. Only "URANS"
Their autonomy in reserves is 15 days, in the course of 12 days. On the economy one they will reach Lisbon. "Buyany-M" are generally ships of the "river-sea" class. Roughly speaking - punt. On the Black Sea they are due to the fact that there are almost no OVR ships in the Black Sea Fleet. The strategic value is even lower than that of corvettes. With their autonomy in general 10 days
In fact, subsonic missiles in general are not in themselves a strategic weapon. Unless when used with nuclear submarines or aircraft ... From ships - this is an operational tactical weapon.

[tokens2]

To whom? A country with an absent or weak air defense - easily. With strong air defense - the probability is zero or close to zero.

A conflict with a country with a developed air defense system implies a broader version of "impact".
Or do you consider the value of cruise missiles exclusively starting from a thousand pieces? Apart from the US budget, no one will draw such numbers.
I don’t think the caliber of the wunderwolf is “everything from everything.” However, the range is obvious. And from what this “range” will be projected after the suppression of air defense.
In principle, for everyone it will be all the same.
This is a barge or a handsome cruiser. Yes, even with a river-sea boat.