Military Review

Boeing 737AEW & C: “Peaceful Eagle” of non-peaceful hosts. Replenishment in the fleet of Turkish AWACS

41



The occupation of the northern part of Iraq, continuing through the Syrian-Turkish border oil traffic from the territories controlled by Daisy, strengthening of the Turkish army units on the border of the SAR, as well as openly arrogant and unsubstantiated statements of the first persons of Turkey, commenting on their "blinkered" vision of the military-political situation in the region, and many other examples only strengthen us in our opinion about the future policy of this country.

The Turkish leadership will not help a bit to reduce the degree of tension in the region, which was established from November 24, when Su-24M of our videoconferencing system was destroyed by a “stab in the back”, and a large division of the NE of Turkey was deployed to the Iraqi Mosul region.

Everything happens with the full support and support of the Turkish army by NATO’s Allied Forces, and this is when Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi makes a call to J. Stoltenberg to calm his alliance ally. But, as we see, "call in the rail"!

New cases of provocations from the Turkish side were also noted, one of which was the dangerous approach of the Turkish seiner on the 2,92 cable (540 m) to the patrol ship of the Black Sea Fleet "Sharp-witted" 13 December 2015, whose crew was forced to use small arms to avoid threatening our ship ( After all, nothing was known about the crew and cargo of the seiner). The situation is really developing according to a bad scenario, as Turkey continues to receive from the West more and more new types of weapons and intelligence systems that change the parity of forces in the Middle East, the Caucasus and the Mediterranean.

9 декабря 2015 года стало известно об окончании формирования звена из четырёх самолётов ДРЛО Boeing 737AEW&C «Peace Eagle» («Мирный орёл»). Первый самолёт был поставлен на вооружение ВВС Турции 31 января 2014 года, таким образом, полноценное звено турецких «смотрящих» создали всего за 2 года. Главным исполнителем контракта стала американская корпорация «Boeing». Американцы собрали для турецких ВВС первый модифицированный под оборудование ДРЛО планер «Boeing 737-400», а австралийский филиал «Boeing» помог в организации наземной обслуживающей и сборочной инфраструктур турецких компаний Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI), HAVELSAN и ASELSAN, которые были задействованы в установке бортового радиоэлектронного и радиолокационного оборудования израильской компании ELTA.

The appearance of a whole link of such aircraft in the Turkish Air Force does not at all contribute to stabilizing the situation in the Middle East, moreover, gives them a feeling of complete control of the situation both over the Black Sea basin and the Caucasus, and in northern Syria. Despite the very strained relations between Turkey and Israel, ELTA nevertheless transferred to Turkish TAI the most advanced MESA ALC with air -borne AFAR, which allows tracking tactical fighters at a distance of 370 — 500 km (depending on EPR) and small-sized cruise missiles.

Самолёты Boeing 737AEW&C значительно расширяют возможности господства в воздухе 200 турецких F-16C, особенно с дальнобойными версиями ракет «воздух-воздух» AIM-120C-7/8 AMRAAM и за счёт высочайшей пропускной способности, достигнутой высокой производительностью БРЭО управления радиолокационным комплексом: 10 операторов радара могут одновременно обнаруживать 3000 целей в режиме обзора и одновременно сопровождать на проходе 180 воздушных, наземных и морских целей, работая с наиболее приоритетными из них. Такая пропускная способность позволяет сохранить контроль в сложнейшей тактической обстановке, где театр военных действий перенасыщен различными источниками угроз, от БПЛА и КР, до истребителей и постановщиков РЭП.

Четыре самолёта могут контролировать участок фронта протяжённостью около 3500—4000 км, а дальность позволяет вести наблюдение за воздушным пространством над Крымом и большей частью Краснодарского края, даже если Boeing 737AEW&C совершает полёт в турецком воздушном пространстве.


Данный турецкий видеоматериал, описывающий принципы работы самолёта ДРЛО Boeing 737AEW&C, опубликован весной 2011 года, когда между Россией и Турцией не наблюдалось никаких признаков "витка" напряжённости. Тем не менее, в конце видеоролика обращает внимание боевой самолёт, выбранный турецкими авторами в качестве машины-агрессора. Это наш Су-34. Этот факт не нуждается в комментариях


Triumph, Pantsir-S400 and EW Krasuha-1 complexes, which in the event of a military confrontation with Turkey will be able to repel powerful anti-personnel units against the Russian contingent, protect the ground infrastructure of the Russian Aerospace System of Russia and parts of the Syrian airspace. in Latakia and Tartus, but such defense will be most secured only in a confident range of C-4 (400 — 250 km at medium and high altitudes and 300 km at supersmall). At longer distances, one will have to rely only on the highest combat qualities of super-maneuverable multi-purpose Su-40CM fighters and Su-30 fighter-bombers, whose informational pilots are still small, since the lack of A-34U aircraft does not allow preventing Turkish fighters from approaching flying from the planes of the A-50U aircraft. heights 40 — 70 meters.

Ведение вероятного воздушного боя против сотен F-16C, наводящихся самолётами AEW&C, одним полком Су-30СМ, без поддержки ДРЛО, также не будет простой задачей. Так что самолёты радиолокационного дозора и наведения для наших лётчиков в САР сейчас имеют очень важное значение.
Author:
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Magic archer
    Magic archer 15 December 2015 07: 50 New
    +1
    Erdogan’s rat has far-reaching plans. There is an active replacement of obsolete military equipment, brainwashing is in progress in the media, Turkey is returning from a secular state to the time of the Ottoman Empire. And the Ottomans did not hide what lands they want to get. They have already invaded Iraq, Syria is next in line, further who ??! The question is of course rhetorical ....
    1. -Traveller-
      -Traveller- 15 December 2015 09: 08 New
      0
      although the question is rhetorical, I can assume that further - the balkans. there is no one to resist the Turks there - everyone fell apart and degraded, there are candidates for "junior allies". there are no other candidates for the region, as Austria used to be, and is not expected.
    2. max702
      max702 15 December 2015 15: 18 New
      +2
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Erdogan rat has far-reaching plans

      What's on him? He is just the appointed chairman of the pound, and no more. The plans of the bourgeois world behind the scenes .. And the plans are simple to drag our country into conflict with STANDARD types of armed forces in which we need to speak directly and quantitatively, and in some places qualitatively lag behind NATO and comrades .. The place of conflict for NATO is perfect, our contingent in Siri is surrounded on all sides, a dozens of times superior enemy, our logistics in the case of the database is practically impossible, and therefore, with the exhaustion of resources for maintaining the database, defeat is inevitable .. Turkey is chosen as a performer simply perfect! She has a lot of problems, a lot of complaints to us, and considerable plans for this region. And at the same time, a very good army that is not particularly afraid of losses, and the NATO’s technical components will quickly be pulled up by NATO partners, which we observe in this article. Immediately after the incident, I said that this was a well-thought out and calculated NATO operation, and there can be no talk of any initiative on the part of Erdogan! Further what is happening is superbly confirmed! All these tricks that NATO is not aware of these initiatives Erdogan cheap comedy, and no more. What follows from this? But very simply, that side calculated all the scenarios of this conflict and worked out solutions to their advantage, the only thing that bothered them was how far Russia’s reaction to a direct military conflict would go (the destruction of SU-24), as it turned out the expected and fully predicted reaction by analysts, that is, angry puffing of cheeks and rolling eyes. Yes, yes! And nothing more! Or does someone think that the transfer of one S-400 battalion and a dozen fighters somehow changed the situation in the region? formidable claims that there will be a harsh response in which case .. so far there have been statements and whether the reaction will be known .. however, let's say that we still decide and pick up a couple of three Turks, and maybe NATO (in the last huge doubts ) but this will not fundamentally change anything! By the forces and means that exist in the region, we cannot defeat Turkey! As a result of the provoked conflict, there will be a quick bloody clash as a result of which our contingent in Syria will be destroyed! And it is a reality!
      1. max702
        max702 15 December 2015 15: 18 New
        -2
        Вот и встает вопрос , а что нам делать после этого? Полномасштабная война с Турцией? Или утремся и все спустим на тормозах? что первый что второй несут на просто громадные политические и экономические издержки с весьма непредсказуемым результатом. Рассмотрим военный вариант. ВМФ Турции превосходит ЧФ России в несколько раз, по авиации тоже как минимум паритет , сухопутную операцию чтоб она прошла успешно нам надо будет готовить полгода минимум ,а учитывая поддержку Турции всем блоком НАТО (как минимум техническими средствами и вооружением) это будет очень серьезная война с громадными потерями и затратами.. способны ли нынешние власти нашей страны пойти на такое очень сомневаюсь , придется перестраивать всю страну переводя ее на военную экономику , с многочисленными чистками "элиты" и прочей требухи.. Второй вариант еще хуже ,и будет напоминать 1905 год.. Это будет точка не возврата нашей страны с дальнейшим скатыванием ее в небытие.. Вот и вопрос что делать? Лично я вижу только один это массированный удар крылатыми ракетами порядка 100 единиц с ТЯО в 10-50 кт каждая.. Этим мы убъем кучу зайцев , обнулим угрозу Турции на десятилетия вперед, докажем всем остальным что нас нельзя загонять в угол,и что стальные яйца имеются да и порох не промок в пороховницах.. Мне скажут дык это третья мировая и яднрный песец! ничего подобного! Это нам терять нечего поражение неизбежно, а вот западным "партнерам " есть чего" У них не все таки плохо и жить slightly lowering your appetites and ambitions они могут весьма успешно еще долгие столетия. А тут есть риск потерять все разом! Нет не будет никаой войны , "партнеры " прекрасно понимают что именно своими действиями они вынудили на это шаг Россию, и не будет она шмалять по США со товарищи ЯО если ее к этому не вынудить.. Если до Турции они в ответе ЯО сомневались , то после нее не будут..
        1. -Traveller-
          -Traveller- 15 December 2015 16: 54 New
          0
          Quote: max702
          Мне скажут дык это третья мировая и яднрный песец! ничего подобного! Это нам терять нечего поражение неизбежно, а вот западным "партнерам " есть чего"

          you have nothing to lose, but I, for example, have a family.
          I have Severomorsk, which in the event of a big war, in which you are so torn, will be covered first of all, in half an hour's drive.
          and for what, in fact, are you so eager to lose all of yours? for Assad to remain at the helm in Syria? what do you need?
          It seems to me that you are cunning when you say that there is nothing to lose. specifically you will lose both a sofa, and the Internet, and marshal's epaulettes
          1. max702
            max702 15 December 2015 18: 03 New
            -2
            Quote: -Traveller-
            you have nothing to lose, but I, for example, have a family.

            Do you speak family? Well, but you look not at 5-10 years in advance, but about a year or two at 25-30 .. And what will you see? Yes, the policy of conciliation and cheeks we will stretch for 5-10 years, the country has a lot of resources, but what then? And the development will be such, they will finally finish the economy through their proteges and sanctions, physically remove the politicians disloyal to them, completely destroy the moral component of our country and much more .. Something similar was observed in the 90s but it turned out that we didn’t manage to finish it, you think now will it be the same? NO! The West is learning very well from its mistakes and this time will solve the question of Russia and the entire Slavic world completely! Your family has no future! NO! There is an option that your children will break into the service of the invaders and will be able to leave another generation behind, but then that's it! There are no plans for the world’s bigwigs of our country and its population, another old Thatcher said 15 million and that's it! Do you really think that everything will work out and they were joking? Do you personally want to watch how your grandchildren who are left orphans (and children are definitely disposed of in one way or another) will go partly to please the old pedophiles, and partly to the organs for them? Do you definitely want the old and sick to watch this while hiding in the garbage? With a loss in the war in Syria, our country will begin to fall into the abyss, it will be the detonator for many sad events, it’s just that we won’t win the war there; the whole Western world is opposing it and the escalation of this conflict will only grow! While it is very likely that as a result of all these actions, in order not to get a final defeat, we will have to use nuclear weapons it will be too late for the ridge will be broken, the country will be torn by then! What the hell with this when you can stop in the bud? chemotherapy against cancer is effective only in the early stages, then it is useless! So can we cut out this cancerous tumor at the very beginning, albeit with a risk to the whole organism?
            1. -Traveller-
              -Traveller- 15 December 2015 20: 56 New
              +2
              you are demonizing the west, your brain has been irradiated with some kind of demonic propaganda. pedophiles, children on organs ... this is already a clinic. they forgot about dog-headed people, devouring humanity.
              all can be negotiated, bargained in the end.
              a couple of years ago we were not surrounded by enemies, we had money, plans for the future, the Olympics and the football championship. and now every second one talks about nuclear war. somehow you need to calm down and return to normal life.
              and then there will be a future for both us and our children.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. doework
          doework 15 December 2015 17: 23 New
          +2
          Сценарий печальный. Нерадостный совсем. Лучший выход, имхо, в течение краткого времени достичь с ами соглашения о разделе САР, с условием сохранения нашей базы, отдав Турции часть севера, а курдам - в противовес Турции - свой кусок. При этом, безусловно, ИГИЛ в САР надо закопать в землю, силами "коалиции" и РФ. При этом можно будет сохранить лицо и базу... При нашей куцей экономике, текущей стоимости нефти и газа, на которых держится бюджет страны и стоимости ведения БД в САР, эту войну мы не сможем продлить хотя бы еще на 3 месяца. Страна сдохнет, блин. А что касается Асада - то, как обычно, поселить в казенной квартире в тихом районе столицы.
          And one more thing: if the database starts without the use of nuclear weapons, the decoupling for our aviation, and then for the ground units, will come very quickly. The NATO military machine in its entirety has obvious quantitative and, in many ways, qualitative superiority in space, at sea, and in the information space.
          It’s time to start straining the GDP of diplomats ... they have very little time left. You can’t fight!
        3. mav1971
          mav1971 15 December 2015 18: 48 New
          0
          Quote: max702
          Personally, I see only one thing - this is a massive strike by cruise missiles of the order of 100 units with nuclear weapons in 10-50 ct each .. This will kill a bunch of rabbits, zero out the threat of Turkey for decades to come, we will prove to everyone else that we cannot be cornered, and that steel eggs Yes, and the gunpowder is not wet in the flasks ..


          Estimate that the Americans believed exactly the same. developing their plans for nuclear attacks on the Soviet Union.

          And also the fear of communism was. And in the same way they wanted to reset the Soviets. to live quietly ...
    3. Civil
      Civil 15 December 2015 16: 54 New
      +2
      here it is the heat of war
  2. Mera joota
    Mera joota 15 December 2015 10: 04 New
    +2
    Boeing 737AEW & C is by far the most optimal variant of the AWACS aircraft. Both in terms of productivity and the duration of patrolling, and there are no equal in operation. We don’t have such a car ...
    1. Bersaglieri
      Bersaglieri 15 December 2015 10: 59 New
      +1
      Верно. На базе планера Ту-214 вышел бы славный самолет ДРЛО. Особенно, если вместо "блина" или "бревна" конформные АФАР поставить
      1. Falcon
        Falcon 15 December 2015 12: 36 New
        +2
        Quote: Bersaglieri
        . Особенно, если вместо "блина" или "бревна" конформные АФАР поставить


        In vain you are against a pancake. Conformal do not cover the review in 360 degrees. Better still triangle afar inside the mushroom.

        or have a freak like an Israeli phalcona do

        Although it is also half measures, it does not see back, and the area is important in comparison with the fungal cloth. Nobody canceled the basic equation of radar.


        A better combination of mushroom and conformal radar
        1. Kir
          Kir 15 December 2015 18: 36 New
          +1
          Falcon and you didn’t be confused by the 1 photo given by you - from him why the screws rotate in one direction or something.
          1. Falcon
            Falcon 15 December 2015 21: 14 New
            0
            Quote: Kir
            Falcon and you didn’t be confused by the 1 photo given by you - from him why the screws rotate in one direction or something.


            Understood nothing? And then the screws, if we are talking about the radar?
            He brought a photo, as the latest modifications have a fixed afar.
            Well, this photo would probably be clearer
            1. Kir
              Kir 20 December 2015 15: 36 New
              0
              What is so incomprehensible I asked you, the radar is a radar but it is also standing on an airplane, and if so then it’s probably worth a closer look at what you are placing, or be ready to answer related questions.
              Thank you for the scheme and in general this is more true for understanding than the photo.
    2. Falcon
      Falcon 15 December 2015 12: 43 New
      +1
      Quote: Mera Joota
      Boeing 737AEW & C is by far the most optimal variant of the AWACS aircraft. Both in terms of productivity and the duration of patrolling, and there are no equal in operation. We don’t have such a car ...


      Budgetary he. Therefore, the states do not buy it for themselves.

      It may be more interesting to offer an option for myself, I think.
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 17 December 2015 17: 02 New
        +1
        Quote: Falcon
        Budgetary he. Therefore, the states do not buy it for themselves.

        Actually, the US has 14 Boeing 737 AEW & C aircraft. If you believe the Russian-language Wikipedia.
  3. aviator1913
    aviator1913 15 December 2015 12: 28 New
    +1
    Boeing 737AEW & C is by far the most optimal variant of the AWACS aircraft. Both in terms of productivity and the duration of patrolling, and there are no equal in operation. We don’t have such a car ...




    The Boeing 737AEW & C is really very good in its class. And very necessary for work away from borders. With a long range and good equipment, it significantly enhances any troop grouping.
  4. vo3
    vo3 15 December 2015 12: 41 New
    +1
    The author of the article touches on the problematic aspects of modern warfare. Problem for us in Syria and not only in it. It is the air operation that highlights all the flaws - there is nothing to plug holes in. You need to know where the enemy is. You need to have a complete information picture. Syria is not a very big country. There is an intelligence and information center where the operators are at the monitors on which everything is visible up to a separate machine, where a single integrated system receives information from airborne early warning aircraft, ground-based equipment, unmanned aerial vehicles, reconnaissance aircraft, shipborne reconnaissance stations, space assets and so on .... in real time.
    Modern combat operations presuppose the presence of three components: information, control, and means of destruction. We are fine with the means of destruction. With management, there’s something like that. But with the informational component, we are head over heels .... Yes, it’s expensive, very technological and high-tech. But without it we can’t .... And it’s very nice to see the racks of generals at press conferences with heaps stars on pagons, just like during the Soviet stagnation. What are they doing, why are they paying money?
    Tell me enough lyrics .. In this regard, if the AWACS only for Turkey they will not be effective. They have control and no means of destruction. ..I’ll say why it’s so difficult for bearded uncles? And tomorrow .... Well, suppose it’s difficult to fight small groups. But if so, it’s very simple to control and destroy oil traffic. At least in Syria and near the border with Turkey, Or maybe I'm right? ..
    1. Ares
      Ares 15 December 2015 14: 42 New
      0
      Normally, everything in the Turks with weapons. Their f-16s are equipped with the latest AIM-120s, while our r-77s are not visible in Syria at all, as in other combat units. Fly with semi-active junk.
  5. Alexez
    Alexez 15 December 2015 12: 48 New
    -2
    It seemed to me or a movie, as they say, was whipped up on my knee? The car next to the radar is hanging in the air, the clowns at the control panel are more like zombie clones. I was especially pleased for our scientists and designers, who, judging by the video of the Turkish Armed Forces, still figured out how to make the SU-34 turbojet engines work without a thermal trace and generally without a flame ...))
  6. Ares
    Ares 15 December 2015 14: 38 New
    +2
    Quote: Zero Nil Seventh
    Elegantly formulated. I love that.

    Well, he could not write directly as it is, that the task of combating such an adversary in the current conditions is impossible. He is also a man, afraid of local cheers.
    1. mav1971
      mav1971 15 December 2015 18: 54 New
      +1
      Quote: Ares
      Quote: Zero Nil Seventh
      Elegantly formulated. I love that.

      Well, he could not write directly as it is, that the task of combating such an adversary in the current conditions is impossible. He is also a man, afraid of local cheers.


      What are they afraid of?
      Take away Claudia and all.
      Quiet hour.
      each ukolchik and on the side :)
  7. gregor6549
    gregor6549 15 December 2015 14: 46 New
    0
    Данная леталка обеспечивает 360 градусную зону обзора по азимуту за счет комбинации различных антенн https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_AEW%26C. Так что против вращающегося "гриба" она явно выигрывает, тем более что у "гриба" есть серьезные ограничения по скорости вращения при низких температурах (а тени над механическим где ему приходится крутиться температуры всегда низкие). А далее идут все преимущества электронного сканирования луча антенны РЛС над механическим. Так что на данный момент времени этот самолет гораздо круче всех других где используются вращающиеся "грибы" Кстати израильский Фэллон обладает схожими характеристиками, хотя и менее эстетичен
  8. iouris
    iouris 15 December 2015 15: 06 New
    0
    In this situation, the performance characteristics are not very important: it is important that qualitative superiority is lost. It is known that we cannot achieve quantitative superiority over NATO. But there are other tools. But on these issues you need to talk with only one opponent who is behind Turkey.
    1. gregor6549
      gregor6549 15 December 2015 15: 24 New
      0
      Actually, the article is about a technical tool, not about politics. It should be discussed about him.
      1. iouris
        iouris 16 December 2015 17: 21 New
        0
        Техническое средство для ВВС Турции очень нужное и, наверное, эффективное. Что касается ВКС, то присутствие самолётов ДРЛО в Сирии особого смысла не имеет: на Б.Востоке группировка ВКС не сможет противостоять авиации "коалиций", задача так не ставится.
  9. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 15 December 2015 16: 57 New
    0
    I wonder why Russia does not design such aircraft. It is possible on the basis of old platforms. Yak-42, Tu-204. This is much cheaper than driving the A-50. Against the background of the military, these aircraft are super economical and highly resourceful! And the groundwork for 4-5 aircraft in the factories is.
    1. mav1971
      mav1971 15 December 2015 18: 56 New
      0
      Quote: Zaurbek
      I wonder why Russia does not design such aircraft. It is possible on the basis of old platforms. Yak-42, Tu-204. This is much cheaper than driving the A-50. Against the background of the military, these aircraft are super economical and highly resourceful! And the groundwork for 4-5 aircraft in the factories is.


      Old school. :(
      There are a lot of alterations in aviation.

      Demand for AWACS aircraft in many countries of the world. Even Thailand and Chile buy it.
      Could become our customers.
      But for them, A-50 is too redundant.
      And there will be more such countries.

      If there were compact ones like Embraer or the Gulf Stream, even the same Tu-214 - I would also hope for demand.

      1. Ares
        Ares 15 December 2015 23: 14 New
        0
        The MS-21 currently under development with extended wings and longer flight duration would be ideal. He is just positioned as a competitor of the 737th.
  10. Kir
    Kir 15 December 2015 18: 41 New
    0
    It’s interesting who has such a developed sense of humor - a peaceful eagle, it’s something like a herbivorous predator, not more than the sellers themselves were distracted.
    1. mav1971
      mav1971 15 December 2015 19: 02 New
      0
      Quote: Kir
      It’s interesting who has such a developed sense of humor - a peaceful eagle, it’s something like a herbivorous predator, not more than the sellers themselves were distracted.


      Leo Alex from the children's cartoon Madagascar :)
  11. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 15 December 2015 19: 03 New
    0
    In a conflict with us, the Turks risk being left without an airfield and without nuclear weapons. The gauges fired not for the bandits, but for all progressive humanity. This is a conventional weapon with a yao effect. The Turks will not be able to reflect the mass launch, they have a difficult terrain, and airfields throughout the territory can be affected. After the defeat of radars and airfields and the threat of an attack, ground forces will not go. And without the appearance of the Kyrgyz Republic, we would have to tight.
    1. Ares
      Ares 15 December 2015 23: 16 New
      0
      Пока не хватает носителей, а также нужно преодолеть определенные проблемы с целеуказанием. Нужно побольше спутников и дронов разведчиков аналогичных классу "глобал хок".
  12. Arikkhab
    Arikkhab 15 December 2015 22: 55 New
    +1
    плохо конечно что в ссср в свое время не довели до ума проект як-44... сейчас что то типа хоккая было бы очень необходимо на а/б в латтакии. кстати, вроде на одном из "макс"ов демонстрировали проект "радар" на базе ил-114 - интересно что с ним стало?
    1. Falcon
      Falcon 16 December 2015 08: 43 New
      0
      Quote: ArikKhab
      плохо конечно что в ссср в свое время не довели до ума проект як-44... сейчас что то типа хоккая было бы очень необходимо на а/б в латтакии. кстати, вроде на одном из "макс"ов демонстрировали проект "радар" на базе ил-114 - интересно что с ним стало?


      To be honest, the first time I hear. Do not confuse with An-71?



      Where is il-xnumx now? Tashkent released it ... Nobody does it and most likely they will not start it. The machine is not cost-effective.

      The problem is not in the Yak-44 - this is a deck aircraft. Note E-2 is not used from the ground. Since it is very expensive, it is easier to transfer its system to a regular passenger business jet.
      Need a locator and a system of calculations and processing. You can put it anywhere.
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 16 December 2015 12: 09 New
        0
        There was no yak in the metal. it was planned two coaxial theater, as on the Tu 95.
        1. Arikkhab
          Arikkhab 16 December 2015 20: 05 New
          0
          engines were planned D-27 - as on the An-70
      2. Arikkhab
        Arikkhab 16 December 2015 20: 04 New
        0
        1) Yak-44 - Deck aircraft radar patrol, guidance and control (RLDNU / DRLOiU) and electronic countermeasures (EW).
        Designed by OKB. A. S. Yakovleva in the mid-70s. The prototype of the Yak-44 (Yak-44RLD) aircraft was selected American E-2 "Hokai." The aircraft was supposed to be based on the atomic aircraft carrier of project 1143.7 Ulyanovsk.
        Due to difficulties in developing on-board equipment, only the Yak-44 was built.
        In 1993, work was frozen due to lack of funding.
        2)Самолеты ДРЛО Е-2 "Хокай" всех модификаций находятся на вооружении США, Египта, Израиля, Сингапура, Тайваня, Франции и Японии. Стоит отметить, что все страны, кроме США и Франции, используют "Хокаи" в качестве "сухопутного" самолета ДРЛО с базированием на "обычные" аэродромы, то есть является более дешевой альтернативой сложному Е-ЗА.
  13. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 16 December 2015 07: 27 New
    +2
    With the advent of AFAR, it is not so difficult to compose a radar of the right size from the finished cells, I think the problem is in the medium. We are waiting for IL 114, this is a good base for various special aircraft.
    1. Falcon
      Falcon 16 December 2015 08: 45 New
      0
      Quote: Zaurbek
      With the advent of AFAR, it is not so difficult to compose a radar of the right size from the finished cells, I think the problem is in the medium. We are waiting for IL 114, this is a good base for various special aircraft.


      Although AFAR is at least silly, there is no difference!
      Nobody cancels the radar equation

  14. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 16 December 2015 12: 08 New
    +1
    В одном случае нужно делать антенну нового размера, в другом- собрать из серийных ячеек и поставить серийные "мозги", а в целом, законам физики я доверяю.
    1. Falcon
      Falcon 16 December 2015 14: 17 New
      0
      Quote: Zaurbek
      В одном случае нужно делать антенну нового размера, в другом- собрать из серийных ячеек и поставить серийные "мозги", а в целом, законам физики я доверяю.


      You can’t even imagine how far from the truth ...

      HEADLIGHT acts as a generator of starting pulses of the frequency synthesizer. The transmitter can be integrated into the headlamp array - then it is an AFAR, or built as a single modulator.

      Next comes the receiver processor, processing processor, and IOI.



      A standard AFAR cell is by definition more expensive, since it is a system of small modulators, and not a single one. And the size of the canvas here does not matter.

      Especially universal brains! Since the processor processes the data arrays - which depend on the power and number of headlights. not per processor per cell