"Marshal Ustinov" will return to service in the second half of 2016

84
By the end of this year, the transfer of the Marshal Ustinov cruiser standing at the Zvezdochka enterprise in Severodvinsk to the military department was prevented by problems with suppliers and the customer’s underestimation of the amount of work, writes Kommersant.

Consecration of the cruiser Marshal Ustinov. Severodvinsk, 2013

The ship will be ready no earlier than the second half of 2016, and the repair time can be adjusted upward again, since the equipment for modernization has not been fully supplied so far.

“Access to the open sea will take place no earlier than June 2016 of the year. Accordingly, the ministry will receive a missile cruiser no earlier than the second half of next year, a source at the United Shipbuilding Corporation told the newspaper. “At the same time, the transfer deadlines may shift to the right, as some problems remain unresolved.”

“Today, a larger volume of deliveries has been closed, however, significant problems have arisen due to the fact that the equipment for a long production cycle was delivered with significant delays,” he explained.

According to a source in the ship repair center itself, problems have arisen, mainly due to the mechanical part and electronics. For a long time, for example, waited for the delivery of a turbogenerator from the St. Petersburg Proletarsky plant.

“One of the main turbine generators was dismantled, and we waited for a long time to replace. Another contractor delayed the installation of the trunk cable for almost a year. Accordingly, the timeline has lengthened, ”he said.

Now the ship passes mooring tests. In parallel with them, several units are under construction, which will then be mounted on a cruiser.

“The modernization will affect the replacement of the electronic stuffing, the control systems and the component base of the cruiser's armament,” said the interlocutor at USC, “The electron beam displays will be replaced with plasma displays, and the microprocessors will also be replaced.”

According to him, “a separate problem remains the impossibility of access to the ship’s personnel for the ship’s documentation: the Marshal Ustinov was built at the beginning of the 1980s in Ukrainian Nikolaev. All documentation remained in the branch of the designer of the ship in Ukraine. ”

The source also noted that "the real volume of repair work more than doubled the planned." “With 2010, we have now entered into service contracts. And only in 2014, when it became clear that the scale of repair goes beyond the scope of service, they signed a new contract with the company for upgrading and repair, ”explained the source.

The press service declined to name the contract, explaining that this is confidential information.

“The ship will be handed over to the Russian Navy in the second half of 2016. This period was approved by the customer and fixed in the relevant decree of the Russian government of 2015. Due to this period a large additional amount of work on the modernization of the electronic systems of the cruiser ", - told in the USC

"To date, a large amount of repair and restoration work has been carried out on the cruiser: repair of the fifth and sixth gas turbine generators has been completed, installation of covers for similar hatches, repair of decks, and exterior painting of the ship are underway," the press service added.

Consecration of the cruiser Marshal Ustinov.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +54
    13 December 2015 14: 10
    Huge periods must be introduced for such sabotage.
    And at present, in general, pulls on sabotage ...

    Inspired by ...


    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +23
        13 December 2015 14: 25
        According to him, “a separate problem remains the inability of the company's employees to access the documentation for the ship: Marshal Ustinov was built in the early 1980s in the Ukrainian Nikolaev
        I do not understand that Nikolaev is showing off. It is necessary on the contrary to cling to cooperation, and so have reached the pen.
        1. +9
          13 December 2015 14: 34
          They have everything according to plan ... Washington ... It should be an agricultural region ..
          Quote: Kil 31
          According to him, “a separate problem remains the inability of the company's employees to access the documentation for the ship: Marshal Ustinov was built in the early 1980s in the Ukrainian Nikolaev
          I do not understand that Nikolaev is showing off. It is necessary on the contrary to cling to cooperation, and so have reached the pen.
        2. +11
          13 December 2015 15: 40
          According to the data that I personally believe, some of the Nikolaev specialists are already working with the new Russian passports in Samara.
          1. jjj
            +5
            13 December 2015 17: 03
            And in Severodvinsk there
        3. +1
          13 December 2015 16: 57
          For so many years, they could not return the documents.
          1. 0
            14 December 2015 08: 02
            I have some doubts ... Didn’t duplicates of the technical documentation have been kept in the bins of the Soviet ministries in Moscow?
        4. +3
          13 December 2015 17: 00
          Quote: keel 31
          I do not understand that Nikolaev is showing off. It is necessary on the contrary to cling to cooperation, and so have reached the pen.

          waiting for them for the debts of Ukraine along with Kherson and Odessa Russia will take ...
        5. +1
          13 December 2015 17: 00
          Quote: keel 31
          I do not understand that Nikolaev is showing off. It is necessary on the contrary to cling to cooperation, and so have reached the pen.

          waiting for them for the debts of Ukraine along with Kherson and Odessa Russia will take ...
        6. 0
          14 December 2015 10: 10
          Quote: Kil 31
          According to him, “a separate problem remains the inability of the company's employees to access the documentation for the ship: Marshal Ustinov was built in the early 1980s in the Ukrainian Nikolaev
          I do not understand that Nikolaev is showing off. It is necessary on the contrary to cling to cooperation, and so have reached the pen.



          So they are of the same type with "Moscow" and "Varyag" .. Do they have any documentation?
    2. +12
      13 December 2015 14: 14
      The missile cruiser Marshal Ustinov, which is undergoing modernization, received a new three-coordinate early warning radar station "Podberezovik" and a "Fregat-M2M" radar with phased antenna arrays, optimized for detecting low-flying targets, the website FlotProm reports, with reference to the press service of the "Ship Repair Center" Star""
    3. +2
      13 December 2015 14: 20
      They are not to blame for the fact that they began to pay attention to the fleet only now. The stump is clear that after the devastation of the 90s and 2000s, nothing will be quickly put into operation. Well, except for the "raptors" of course.
      1. 0
        14 December 2015 08: 05
        Their total 6 pieces are made
    4. +29
      13 December 2015 14: 23
      Quote: Vladimir
      Huge periods must be introduced for such sabotage.
      And at present, in general, pulls on sabotage ...

      Inspired by ...

      What a sabotage, what a sabotage. There was an enterprise that supplied equipment for the Navy, and it was covered with a copper basin for the rebuilding of Gorbaty! Who should send gearboxes, axles, mechanisms if there are no enterprises for repair. I’m not talking about new developments with electronics, chemistry either. In essence, a new industrialization of the country is required.
      1. +2
        13 December 2015 14: 42
        I agree 100%
      2. +15
        13 December 2015 15: 29
        Quote: APASUS
        In essence, a new industrialization of the country is required.

        In essence, the nationalization of elites is required, for starters. And it’s not clear what state they work for. But obviously not in Russian. Hence the lack of responsibility to the country and its citizens.
        To justify the failure of the modernization deadlines by the unavailability of allied enterprises is absurd. When they received the terms of reference and made production plans, what did they think about? About what "will be understood and forgiven" in case of failure? Like "let's justify ourselves by the general collapse of the industry"? But in fact, we see the untimely fulfillment of the defense order and the undermining of the combat readiness of the Navy.
        1. -1
          13 December 2015 16: 37
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          Quote: APASUS
          In essence, a new industrialization of the country is required.

          In essence, the nationalization of elites is required, for starters. And it’s not clear what state they work for. But obviously not in Russian. Hence the lack of responsibility to the country and its citizens.
          To justify the failure of the modernization deadlines by the unavailability of allied enterprises is absurd. When they received the terms of reference and made production plans, what did they think about? About what "will be understood and forgiven" in case of failure? Like "let's justify ourselves by the general collapse of the industry"? But in fact, we see the untimely fulfillment of the defense order and the undermining of the combat readiness of the Navy.


          Be careful with your statements, your call for "nationalization of the elites" is close to Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
          1. +6
            13 December 2015 17: 52
            Quote: Civil
            Be careful with your statements, your call for "nationalization of the elites" is close to Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
          2. +4
            13 December 2015 19: 32
            Quote: Civil

            Be careful with your statements, your call for "nationalization of the elites" is close to Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

            Hardly. "Incitement to hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of the dignity of .. a group of persons .. by belonging to any social group" is not at all like. At least due to the lack of a clear definition of the social group called the "elite" smile
          3. 0
            13 December 2015 20: 58
            Nationalization, capitalization, urbanization, etc. - Everywhere there’s some kind of action, and you won’t get enough articles.
        2. 0
          14 December 2015 08: 08
          The military industrial complex is already controlled by the state, with a few exceptions (like the Zelenodolsk plant, famous for its Buyans)
      3. +4
        13 December 2015 16: 33
        Quote: APASUS
        What a sabotage, what a sabotage. There was an enterprise that supplied equipment for the Navy, and it was covered with a copper basin for the rebuilding of Gorbaty! Who should send gearboxes, axles, mechanisms if there are no enterprises for repair. I’m not talking about new developments with electronics, chemistry either. In essence, a new industrialization of the country is required.

        It can be even simpler - the cable was Ukrainian. This was already encountered at the North Shipyard at the end of last year - we ordered ours, and after that, after transportation and installation, insulation fell down, the boys ran with square eyes, the time is short, it's good that we figured it out.
      4. +13
        13 December 2015 17: 31
        To begin with, we need the industrialization of the brains of our powers that be and the moral and ethical modernization of the materially wealthy "elite." And the government continues only to monitor and perform the function of a tax collector. Even the Americans in the 90s got out of the crisis only by creating state corporations, which also ensured a decrease in unemployment. Only a tough, transparent state. the control system as under the USSR can give effective results.
        And a bunch of private contractors and suppliers with their own charter in their monastery will not make the difference. Plus, there are a lot of banks willing to squeeze income out of any penny. The result is a huge and clumsy system with its own petty-proprietary interests. Benefit is at the forefront. And one can only dream of elementary respect for the work of craftsmen and specialists (both material and moral). And turners of the 6th grade, like combiners, do not just grow on trees in the spring. In the meantime, it remains "proud" only of the fabulous incomes of our top managers from Gazprom and Rosneft - why do they get that kind of money and where do they put it? (Well, I got it ...)
        1. +2
          13 December 2015 21: 11
          So fabulous incomes are not from a great mind, but from raking handles and from the roof, but real specialists who move the oil industry and Gazprom forward, down there, you can be the first to twist your head and nothing will change for the worse. This is not a brain trust, but an amorphous fat-coated mass.
      5. -3
        13 December 2015 20: 49
        And that they did not know, they got involved in the war, but industrialization was not carried out. The Americans failed with our resources to fail the war in Afghanistan and Iraq, and even with ground troops. Soon ridicule the world community, pulled in as small children. Capital divorce, opuses will be composed. Weapons tested - tested, acting - acting, to test that they have not tested and discreetly discarded. Something the 150 thousandth Syrian army is not in a hurry to battle, as we were assured at the beginning of the company. Well, to our head cutters, the Bosko should be unscrewed upon return and strengthen the border, although they will begin to sabotage again.
        1. +8
          14 December 2015 01: 59
          Quote: varov14
          The Americans failed with our resources to fail the war in Afghanistan and Iraq, and even with ground troops.


          Who told you that they failed them ?! Maybe you need to set priorities correctly. In my opinion, the Americans did not initially have the goal of destroying the Taliban, but they successfully carried out opium production and drug control. Also with Iraq, the objectionable Saddam was removed, control over Iraq was obtained, Daesh was created, oil is received almost for free with their help! So I do not see any failures, just their goals are far from the ones they state in words, everything is very simple!
    5. +4
      13 December 2015 14: 28
      Many consider this project to be the best and most balanced ocean zone project built in the Soviet years. Trouble-free gas turbines, stock buoyancy, powerful weapons. 1144 still came out oversaturated, too heavy, complex and expensive. It is a pity that in the union they made 4pcs 1144 and only 3,5pcs 1164. At one time, they planned to build a dozen 1164
    6. 0
      13 December 2015 15: 28
      At 9:03 Moscow time, the ship’s watch service discovered at a distance of about 1 meters a Turkish vessel approaching the anchored IC “Smetlivy” from the starboard side, ”the military department said.

      “Despite the numerous attempts of the Shrewd, the crew of the Turkish seiner did not make radio contact with the Russian sailors and did not respond to special visual signals of the light semaphore and signal missiles,” the Ministry of Defense emphasized.

      QUOTE
      When approaching a Turkish seiner with a Russian patrol ship at a distance of about 600 meters, in order to prevent a collision of ships, in the direction of the Turkish ship at a distance of guaranteed non-defeat, small arms were used
      Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
      According to the ministry, “immediately after this, the Turkish vessel abruptly changed course and, without getting in touch with the Russian crew, continued to move past SC Smetlivy at a distance of 540 meters.”

      “In connection with the incident in the Aegean Sea, Deputy Defense Minister of the Russian Federation Anatoly Antonov called on the military attache at the Turkish Embassy in Russia,” the ministry said.
      1. hartlend
        +1
        13 December 2015 18: 58
        Off-topic commentary.
    7. +9
      13 December 2015 15: 47
      What is sabotage? They put it on repair, it turned out that the repair needed a more serious one. At the same time, they decided to modernize. While the work was being carried out, THE BREAKTHROUGH WITH UKRAINE BEGAN, hence the need for import substitution. The ship in Nikolaev was under construction. Each time, the dates were naturally postponed. Well, who are going to shoot, shooters? Workers, engineers, navy, or shoot yourself in FIG? negative
      1. jjj
        +1
        13 December 2015 17: 10
        By the way, it was the same with Vikramaditya. The Indians even had to pay extra. In fact, this is repair and, in parallel, the restoration of project documentation. Invaluable experience. As for the disrupted supplies, then, most likely, a trace of sanctions can be found here.
        According to the picture above. The steamer is painted in a light ball color. And on the Northern Fleet, dark is in fashion. "Peter" a couple of years ago at dusk seemed almost black. And, pay attention, below the waterline in the area of ​​the ice belt is a wide black stripe
        1. 0
          13 December 2015 19: 25
          Quote: jjj
          The steamer is painted in a light ball color. And on the Northern Fleet, dark is in fashion. "Peter" a couple of years ago at dusk seemed almost black.

          Have you been following the naval fashion for a long time? :))) For your information, "Peter" has been painted in a light-ball "NATO" color for five years already, the rest of the fleet, by the way, too
    8. 0
      13 December 2015 20: 31
      Dragging and sabotage are the main enemies of GDP. We are straining with GDP, every year they strive to roll and lower it.
  2. +5
    13 December 2015 14: 10
    In fact, for failure to meet the deadlines for putting the ship into operation, responsibility is laid, up to the criminal one. Especially in such a difficult time. Will they punish someone? I doubt very much.
    And the news is still gratifying - "Atlanta" is necessary for the fleet. It is a pity, in due time, they did not agree to buy out "Lobov" from Ukraine in 90% readiness. Now this is no longer possible, unfortunately.
    1. +1
      13 December 2015 14: 17
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      And the news is still gratifying - "Atlanta" is necessary for the fleet. It is a pity, in due time, they did not make a reservation to buy "Lobov" from Ukraine in 90% of readiness. Now this is no longer possible, unfortunately.

      ----------------------
      The hull of the ship is handsome, of course, such contours are harmonious smooth ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      13 December 2015 14: 18
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      In fact, for failure to meet the deadlines for putting the ship into operation, responsibility is laid, up to the criminal one. Especially in such a difficult time. Will they punish someone? I doubt very much.
      And the news is still gratifying - "Atlanta" is necessary for the fleet. It is a pity, in due time, they did not agree to buy out "Lobov" from Ukraine in 90% readiness. Now this is no longer possible, unfortunately.



      Redrawing the hull is more expensive and more difficult than making a new ship.
    4. 0
      13 December 2015 14: 25
      And the news is still gratifying - "Atlanta" is necessary for the fleet. It is a pity, in due time, they did not agree to buy out "Lobov" from Ukraine in 90% readiness. Now this is no longer possible, unfortunately



      “Ukraine”, which stands in Nikolaev, they wanted to redeem from Ukraine, repair and modernize, and make the Pacific Fleet the flagship instead of “Varyag,” but as you can see, it’s not fate and now this cruiser will go to us only when Ukraine falls apart or seizes it ... sad
      1. +1
        13 December 2015 14: 32
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        and now this cruiser will go to us only when Ukraine falls apart or seizes it

        There is already nothing good - the ship rusts and falls into disrepair. I looked at his current photographs - a depressing state. And why? The Ukrainians were renamed "Admiral Lobov" into "Ukraine", but Ukraine is not for sale! No. And Serdyukov (in his mouth with a tongue) said that "we will take it only for nothing." Here is the result. Now, only if they sell it for "needles", and even then not to us ...
        1. +1
          13 December 2015 18: 36
          Well, what about Serdyukov (he said a little wrong), when it came to selling, the other side broke such a price that buying on it was just a betrayal. It was like in 2012 year. After that, all the conversations subsided.
          In September 2013, it became known that representatives of the military-industrial commission under the Government of Russia agreed with the leadership of Ukraine on the purchase of an unfinished cruiser for 1 billion rubles [11]. At the beginning of the 2013 year, the cost of completing the cruiser, according to the company Shipbuilding Plant named after 61 Communard, was estimated at 1,4 billion hryvnias, or 5,6 billion rubles [12] - this was after Serdyukov.
  3. +1
    13 December 2015 14: 11
    As no longer new breaks in economic ties are still hitting and are pretty painful. Plus, problems with suppliers are still not very clear. When will it all end?
    1. +4
      13 December 2015 14: 20
      Quote: venaya
      When will it all end?

      Unfortunately, not soon. Then, when whole branches of industry will be restored, for example, electronics production, instrument making, machine tool construction, etc., etc. Everything that was destroyed "as unnecessary" in 25 years.
    2. +1
      13 December 2015 15: 13
      Quote: venaya
      When will it all end?

      You looked at the photo? So the main character is pop, so he waved with a censer and now everything will work out and the terms and suppliers and electronics lol
      Apparently the country's leadership thinks in this regard.
      But seriously, the deplorable state of all industries in the country is obvious, as is the fact that the country's leadership is not doing anything in terms of the strategic development of the industry.
      Neither in the president’s message nor in the prime minister’s interview did the industrialization course be voiced.
      Hence the question, what kind of construction of ships of the first rank can we talk about, if we cannot repair and modernize on time, even the existing ships?
      All hope for priests ... sadness ...
      1. jjj
        0
        13 December 2015 17: 12
        Quote: Stroporez
        All hope for priests ... sadness ...

        And what to invite? There is an old naval tradition of blessing a ship. As they say, may the Lord help you
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +3
    13 December 2015 14: 14
    ... however, significant problems arose due to the fact that the equipment for a long manufacturing cycle was delivered with significant delays, ”he explained.
    For a long time, for example, they were waiting for the delivery of a turbogenerator from the St. Petersburg Proletarsky Zavod.
    “One of the main turbine generators was dismantled, and we have been waiting for a replacement for a long time. Another contractor delayed the installation of the trunk cable for almost a year. Accordingly, the deadlines have lengthened, "

    And what about these contractors? Someone parted with a post, paid a fine, someone was generally told ay-ay-ay for misuse of financial resources? Or is it scary to say - maybe they stamped someone on a foot ?!
    1. 0
      13 December 2015 14: 45
      These are private companies, the state cannot influence them in any way, except to terminate the contract.
      1. +3
        13 December 2015 14: 54
        Maybe even how it can. One problem - who runs the country? Who is the owner of these most private companies? If these people are not related, then the kents are for sure. And as you know, the raven will not peck out the crow's eye.
    2. +4
      13 December 2015 19: 54
      Quote: Moore
      . however, significant problems arose because the equipment was supplied with a long production cycle with significant delays, ”he explained.
      For a long time, for example, they were waiting for the delivery of a turbogenerator from the St. Petersburg Proletarsky Zavod.
      “One of the main turbine generators was dismantled, and we have been waiting for a replacement for a long time. Another contractor delayed the installation of the trunk cable for almost a year. Accordingly, the deadlines have lengthened, "
      And what about these contractors? Someone parted with a post, paid a fine, someone was generally told ay-ay-ay for misuse of financial resources? Or is it scary to say - maybe they stamped someone on a foot ?!

      Well, the plant is lying about the turbine generator, everything was delivered and mounted on the ship a long time ago! And in general - a turbine generator is a "drop in the ocean" of problems in ship repair! There is an acute shortage of competent specialists, and those who have such a "fence" sometimes, what do you grab at the head ... belay With the same generators - first we centered the machine, then "vnatyag" mounted the gas exhaust to it and the air intake shafts - accordingly, the alignment "went away", let's start again ... And so in everything - the repair is very slow due to inconsistency of work between the shops a lot to redo ... I'm waiting for the first exit to the sea - with such an approach at the shipyard to repair the ship, as it is now - there is a very high probability of returning in tow, and again endless elimination of comments ... and where the end of 2016 is, there is 2017- th not far off ...
      Sorry for the emotionality, just pent! am
      And at this time from the remaining two cruisers and their crews heroically "suck the last juices" in endless campaigns ...
  6. 0
    13 December 2015 14: 17
    Is this a Moscow classmate?
    1. +3
      13 December 2015 14: 22
      Yes. TOF "Varyag", Black Sea Fleet "Moscow" and SF "Marshal Ustinov". In country 404, another one is rotting ...
    2. +1
      13 December 2015 14: 25
      Quote: lukke
      Is this a Moscow classmate?

      "Moscow" is the lead "Atlant", and "Marshal Ustinov" is like the second or third ... so the younger brother, then ...)
      1. 0
        13 December 2015 23: 12
        Quote: Egevich
        "Moscow" is the lead "Atlant", and "Marshal Ustinov" is like the second or third ... so the younger brother, then ...)

        Middle brother :)) Younger - "Varyag"! And the unborn child - "Lobov" ... sad
  7. 0
    13 December 2015 14: 21
    And I'm more annoyed by the tales of documentation, intelligence, where are you? negative
    1. +1
      13 December 2015 22: 35
      Quote: kagorta
      And I'm more annoyed by the tales of documentation, intelligence, where are you? negative

      And how do you imagine the design documentation, are you annoying ours ?;) in the form of a flash drive with documents, diagrams and drawings, which can be taken out in briefs across the border?!;) The design documentation for the cruiser is actually the size of a medium library and weighs a couple tons for sure;) and nobody converted it into electronic form in Ruin, because Firstly, it takes a lot of time and secondly, nobody fucks there;)
      You need to think before you write comments!
      1. 0
        14 December 2015 16: 20
        Something Ukrainians have stolen our documentation for the Bison. We even got someone planted for it. From your words nobody needs this in Ukraine. So intelligence for that exists, that would become necessary. laughing And when our intelligence needed something, containers were taken out under the guise of diplomatic mail.
        1. 0
          10 November 2016 08: 21
          This is possible if the head of state: Nikolai 1, Alexander3 or Comrade Stalin
  8. +5
    13 December 2015 14: 22
    I read on the Internet where I don’t remember anymore, that the head destroyer of the project 23560 Leader being developed now is being named after Yevgeny Primakov. For the first time, the appearance of the ship in the layout was demonstrated in the summer as part of the Army-2015 international military-technical forum. Its performance characteristics were not fully disclosed, but it is known that on board there will be about 60 anti-ship cruise missiles, 128 anti-aircraft guided missiles and 16 anti-submarine guided missiles. All missile weapons of the destroyer will be located in vertical launchers. In addition, the ship is able to carry on board two multi-purpose helicopters. Its displacement will be about 17,5 thousand tons, length - 200 m, width - 20 m. Ships of this type will be able to reach speeds of up to 30 knots and perform autonomous voyages of up to 90 days.
    1. 0
      13 December 2015 18: 00
      17,5? thousand tons. yes, "Atlanta" has a full 11380 ... it turns out that in terms of displacement, destroyers will be larger than cruisers. meaning to build such monsters? Now the striking power in the displacement is much less invested.
  9. +7
    13 December 2015 14: 26
    The fact is that the real volume of work, and, accordingly, the cost and terms of these works, can be established only after the docking of the ship and its full revision. And this is also time and money. Preliminary repair list almost never corresponds to reality, especially in medium and major repairs.

    Theft also thrives among contractors
    1. +1
      13 December 2015 14: 32
      In-in, then Nakhimov should not wait until 2020. And besides, if at all we can handle its repair.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        13 December 2015 14: 53
        Quote: amba balamut 77
        In-in, then Nakhimov should not wait until 2020. And besides, if at all we can handle its repair.



        “Admiral Nakhimov” - undergoing modernization and repair, after launching (in 2018) it will be the most powerful ship of the Russian Navy, even more powerful than Peter the Great due to more modern weapons, 4. “Peter the Great” - as the flagship of the Northern Fleet is known, It will float until 2018, and after that it will go on modernization and will stay on it until about 2020-2021. As a result, by 2020, somewhere in our Navy there will probably be as many as 3 Heavy Cruisers of the Orlan project, which of course adds optimism, after all, after all, these are the largest non-carrier ships and perhaps the most powerful ships on the planet in general.
        1. +2
          13 December 2015 15: 01
          Your words yes to God in the ears ... What kind of beast is this "Eagle" I have a little idea. For Nakhimov, doubts gnaw at me, for Peter and even more so for Lazarev, with the modern approach until 2021, I do not believe at all. hi
        2. 0
          13 December 2015 16: 54
          Quote: Denis Obukhov
          As a result, by 2020, somewhere in our Navy will probably have as many as 3 Heavy Cruisers of the Orlan project

          and the third one, excuse me? feel
    2. +1
      13 December 2015 20: 01
      Quote: arane
      Preliminary repair list almost never corresponds to reality, especially in medium and major repairs.

      I agree with you, I will just correct - the concept of "overhaul" refers only to civilian ships and ships of the auxiliary fleet, and for warships there is only the concept of "medium repair", which is essentially a major overhaul! hi
      1. +2
        13 December 2015 22: 21
        Quote: severyanin
        Quote: arane
        Preliminary repair list almost never corresponds to reality, especially in medium and major repairs.

        I agree with you, I will just correct - the concept of "overhaul" refers only to civilian ships and ships of the auxiliary fleet, and for warships there is only the concept of "medium repair", which is essentially a major overhaul! hi


        Yes. The military has planned factory repairs - these are dock, current and medium.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +6
    13 December 2015 14: 29
    Another contractor almost Per year tightened the installation of the trunk cable

    belay
    How is it for a YEAR ?! A half-ship of a new one is being built in a year, not just the cable is laid. This is some kind of sabotage.
    To date, a large amount of repair and restoration work has been carried out on the cruiser: the fifth and sixth gas turbine generators have been repaired, installation is underway similar manhole covers, deck repair, ship exterior painting»

    That is, almost nothing has been done. Behind two of the year....
  12. +2
    13 December 2015 14: 30
    it from what metal and material the cable could not make an entire year?
  13. 0
    13 December 2015 14: 32
    Electron beam displays ?!
    It seems that there you need to change all the equipment.
    1. KCA
      0
      14 December 2015 07: 58
      Well, I also have an electron-beam display LG F920P, he’s 11 years old, I’m not going to change it, I hope a few more years, I also have CRTs on the radar, the word itself is not an indicator of outdated equipment and the need for replacement
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    13 December 2015 14: 39
    And it seems to me that the remnants of Serdyukov’s shadow take place in underestimation, so to speak ...
  16. +2
    13 December 2015 14: 39
    On the one hand, the modernization of equipment is so rapid, especially in the field of management, that you can constantly adjust the content and characteristics of the equipment. And it might not be worth the haste here. And regarding the documentation from Nikolaev, so the Ukrainians are ready to sell their mother for dollars now, therefore problems with this should not be, unless of course it is relevant! And then the piquant moment with the loading of the ship repair enterprise. Any team wants to have stable work and employment, and repairing a ship of this class is a good way to earn money. So let the middle ground in all this be determined by specialists.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +2
    13 December 2015 14: 41
    Ustinov was put in for repair during a cashier budget, plus his capital, without much modernization. If Moscow is now put up for repair (I am silent about the modernization), then when will it return to operation, in the year 203. which one? In this way we are in the 21st century, we will be the same mighty sea power as Russia of the 17th century.
  19. +1
    13 December 2015 14: 43
    grin of socialism Yes nostalgia feel
  20. +3
    13 December 2015 14: 50
    Since 2010, the company entered into service contracts. And only in 2014, when it became clear

    for such real prison sentences it is necessary to give. Stalin is not on them.
  21. 0
    13 December 2015 14: 50
    NO DELAYS !!! Everything should be the most advanced domestic and on time !!!
  22. +3
    13 December 2015 15: 03
    Yes, things are going, as they say, not shaky, not roll, but where are the "landing" for sabotage?
    1. 0
      13 December 2015 15: 25
      It is very unfortunate that we already have few ships of the ocean zone as part of the Navy, and although they undoubtedly need to be modernized, there is no way to disrupt the dates, especially for such a long time.
  23. +1
    13 December 2015 16: 23
    With ships, we are in trouble ...

    I wonder ... how is Moscow still on the go?
  24. 0
    13 December 2015 16: 27
    But it is not yet known how long the sea trials, live firing ...
  25. 0
    13 December 2015 18: 53
    Quote: g1v2
    According to the data that I personally believe, some of the Nikolaev specialists are already working with the new Russian passports in Samara.

    It is necessary to hire not all, but those who seized the documents ... laughing
  26. 0
    13 December 2015 19: 15
    But why don't the Zvezdochka subcontractors get bells off for delays? It's about the state's defense capability.
  27. +6
    13 December 2015 20: 17
    More questions than answers. If I'm not mistaken, this is Project 1164 Atlant. All ships of this class were built in Nikolaev in the 80s. "Varyag" aka the former "Chervona Ukraine" from the same series. 2013 scheduled repairs at Dalzavod, 2015 dock repairs. There were no questions about technical documentation.
    1.12 14g, the official representative of the Zvezdochka shipbuilding plant, Gladyshev, said that a program of factory sea trials would begin in the 3rd quarter of 2015.
    For 20 years it was possible to take out all the archives of Nikolaev or buy from Ukrainians. Subchiki can not cope, so find new ones. Or, as always, there is sloppiness, sabotage, and theft.
    1. +1
      13 December 2015 23: 23
      Quote: kapitan92
      For 20 years it was possible to take out all the archives of Nikolaev or buy from Ukrainians. Subchiki can not cope, so find new ones. Or, as always, there is sloppiness, sabotage, and theft.

      You are right in everything! For 20 years, there is a lot of things that could have been done, but - Alas, we have what we have ... We got used to "sitting on the buttocks", the liberals were satisfied that many key industries, technologies and documentation were located in Ukraine, and now it is painfully necessary to establish its production ...
      You don't have to go far for an example - the same gas turbine engines for the fleet! Complete seams, kakli with these engines the entire fleet is almost for the "soft spot" hold am
      And it is still unknown how things are with the engines at Ustinov itself - six turbines, all "Made in Ukraine", have not been launched for five years, what will happen? If at least one fails, where to get it?
  28. +1
    13 December 2015 20: 19
    Yes, everything was immediately clear in terms. If new ships build longer than expected, repair and modernization is a long story. I am glad that things are going, the mooring trials have begun. So the entry into operation is close.
    1. +4
      13 December 2015 20: 40
      "So the commissioning is close."
      Tradition is fresh, but hard to believe! You can't do without the administrative resource of "Moscow" !!!!!!!
  29. +1
    13 December 2015 21: 25
    Priests - not the topic.
  30. 0
    13 December 2015 23: 05
    Electron beam displays will be replaced by plasma

    Quite stupid, TFT is cheaper, or the correspondent is a goof, does not see the edge of his phone. Try to shove the plasma into the 37 cm diagonal, de. Beat, s.
  31. +2
    13 December 2015 23: 40
    But the USSR fleet was not consecrated - is it good or bad? Now the steamships will probably sink less, something reminiscent of the 90s: - they lit the car, lit the apartments, and bandits were constantly baptized and then again went to work))))
    PS I repeat, Soviet shipbuilders were the best designers in the world. Look at 1164 and create something prettier
    1. 0
      14 December 2015 12: 55
      Well, yes, each rocket is blessed before takeoff - and how many have already fallen?
      The USSR also did not consecrate, and how much fell there?
  32. 0
    14 December 2015 04: 54
    terms apparently moved due to the installation of cassettes)
  33. 0
    14 December 2015 20: 39
    Apparently, there is no replacement for the "Volcanoes", but do they exist? And here they have repeatedly written that the main feature - a salvo launch with one rocket-leader, which throws off information to everyone else - was never carried out. Maybe it was worth changing to the Onyx Caliber (or inventing a naval version of Iskander)?
  34. 0
    14 November 2016 19: 24
    Rather, I would have taken my place in the ranks, with cruisers we are a little tough, especially if we take into account the current conditions. But with suppliers delaying the implementation of defense deliveries (not only for the navy) we need to deal more severely. Although with whom to deal? Our entire financial and economic bloc in the government is clearly "pro-Westerners", they do not care about the image of Russia, its prestige, "shift workers", they sleep and see themselves not with Russia, nothing else even comes to mind, but for some reason their GDP still suffers. Oh, it's time to cleanse the country from liberoids!