Military Review

Wars have been, are and will be - because of resources

102
Recently, people in our country are concerned about the question: will there be war or not. Will Russia fight with someone or not. People, wake up, war or even war have long been going around Russia. And from this you can not escape and escape. War is like a given for Russia. Almost all world conquerors and tyrants, of the last 1000 years, have visited these territories. They came to the boundless spaces of our country not as welcome guests, but as conquerors. All the trouble in the location of Russia, it is located in the center of Eurasia and its infinite wealth.




The world is moving toward a resource famine and the next repartition of the “world pie”, that is, wars. The fact that it is inevitable was clear to any person, since the whole история of humanity. The political and economic struggle for certain resources, depending on the time and needs of mankind, invariably accompanies our civilization. When the political and economic struggle gradually comes to a standstill, then the guns enter into an argument. “War is the continuation of politics by other means” - Clausewitz.

We had to live at this time, and before that, at “the same times”, our grandfathers and great-grandfathers lived.

From life practice, many, many years ago, one had to talk with acquaintances, relatives, well, with naive people who believe in sincere friendship, or even in the “love” of Russia with the West. We say the West - we mean the United States.

I always asked the first question: “And how many people live in Russia?” Many people, by the way, do not know how much, only know that much. At the time, immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, 1992 148 514 lived in the Russian Federation in 692. In the 2014 year, before the reunification with the Crimea, 143 666 931 lived in the country. Now 146 267 288 people live in Russia, together with the population of the Crimea. The peak of population degeneration in Russia was in 2008, then 140 lived in the country 008 838 people. Maternal capital, by the way, was introduced with 2007 of the year.

As you can see, the “Putin regime” slowly, but surely, pursues a course towards the revival of Russia. But he, Putin, was argued with foaming at the mouth that Russia was coming to an end and nothing would save her from the “demographic cross”. It seems: “And do not try to flutter the“ guarantor ”, it’s still Russia’s kirdyk! The institute is not simple, but gold. Yes, yes, it is golden. With the light hand of Soros and many other grantees from the West, the grantors of this institute lived very well, and at times even elegant.

So this fruit is apricot, Rabinovich for the Pope and Vishnevsky for marriage, over the last 40 over and over, which is not prophesied. In his youth, in developed socialism, he had access to specialized literature from the West, in institute and academic libraries. He drew from them that the demographic problems and self-generation of the West are not threatened, and he will move into a phase of self-reproduction, as a highly developed and civilized society. Well what can I say. Got it! I got a bastard, a finger in the shit!

Then this subchik began to predict the inevitable influx of migrants from all of Asia to Russia, and that this would be a great blessing for Russia, and this should not be resisted. Since Russia is still dying out, and in the 21 century, 80-90 will be inhabited by millions of people on its territory. This is in his pessimistic scenario, he had encouraging scenarios, but he expected the worst. The whole message of Rabinovich-Vishnevsky was: “We must relax and enjoy”.

No, in Russia no one is against migrants. But it must be qualified personnel! Those who know Russian, respect Russia, are willing and able to work, and also serve for the benefit of their new homeland. Freeloaders who are like partners and even blood relatives are not needed by Russia. Even for nothing. What kind of partners do we send, ... Away? No, not far away. Digest garbage and ballast - is the lot of Europe, led by Merkel. Named gruzdem - get into the box.

By the way, in 2006, the deputy. FMS director Vyacheslav Postavnin scared the whole of Russia, ostensibly: “Before 200, millions of Chinese are ready to leave the PRC for Russia.” Just imagine how much rail trains with cars to put on railway tracks to transport this epic mass of people to Russia. … What? ... Are teplushki re-open? Perhaps if they are in such quantities. In those years, many who have predicted! So for example, a certain Borisov, the head of the Association of Entrepreneurs “Support of Russia” demanded to open quotas for the arrival in Russia of up to 20 of millions of labor migrants. He justified this by saying that by 2030, the population of Russia would shrink 2 times ..

As you can see, all the demographers, businessmen, officials hit the finger. ... There, there.

But let us now return from the demographics in Russia to our topic and conversation about the population.

The second question I always asked was: “How many people live on our globe?” For most people, this is a matter of “light bulb”. How many lives, so many lives. In 1990, 5 265 000 000 people lived on earth, roundly. In 2015, approximately 7 400 000 000 people live on Earth.
And then I ask the third question: “And how many percent of people live in our country, of the entire population of the Earth?”

If we calculate approximately 1990 a year from the entire population of the Earth and 1992 a year - people in Russia, it turns out that about 2,8% of the total population of the Earth lived in Russia.

We count on 2015 year, and what do we get? Currently, about 1,95% of people from the entire population of the Earth take root in Russia.

These figures are roughly conditional, the demographers have more accurate ones, and demand from them. But, I hope, you roughly see the trend of population growth and the development of the situation in the world, relative to Russia.

And now the main question I usually ask is: “How many percent of the world's natural resources do Russia have?” Almost no one knows anything! If you heard something about gas, then about all other resources - a dark forest. By the way, gas in Russia, without shale, approximately 35-37% of all explored in the world. Well, the forest in Russia grows about 20% of the world. And there are still water resources, arable land, sea shelves with fish, coal, oil, gold, platinum, diamonds ...

It is possible to enumerate all natural resources of Russia for a very long time and persistently, but it is easier to give one, generalized, but approximate figure for all resources. According to various experts, Russia holds a bank, which is approximately from 20 to 23% of all world natural resources !!!

Imagine now the value of all these resources! These are huge numbers with many zeros. If you translate into hard currency, as the whole world now considers, and according to the CIA, the amount will be approximately 300-350 trillions of dollars. These are simply colossal numbers not of virtual, but real wealth. This is not a record in banks with a huge number of zeros, like the dollars stored there. Yes, many immediately lead to a counterargument that these resources are difficult to extract and currently unprofitable. Right. So with other countries with natural resources, the situation is exactly the same, and even under such conditions Russia is in reserves ahead of the rest of the world!

Now compare the percentage of the Russian population of the entire population of the Earth and the amount of natural resources that are under the direct control of Russia. Bare numbers: population -1,95% and natural resources - 20-23%. Natural resources are the real and most valuable asset of Russia. We do not speak about the people of Russia, as we found out, they are priceless.

That is the problem of Russia - this is the fact that it has almost a quarter of the world's mineral resources in its bins. This is the main reason why Russia does not love, and if it is more accurate to say, it hates the West fiercely, aka Uncle Sam. It is unfair, “do you care!” That Russia occupies a huge territory, which is literally crammed with fantastically rich deposits of natural resources.

It turns out that the casket just opens, fabulous natural resources is the true reason why the United States declared psychological war against Russia. And it started not at all today or even yesterday: all the 90s and the beginning of the 2000s Russia fought with Uncle Sam's “sent Cossacks”. These were his people, not Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other vassal transmission links. The main one is always the one who orders “music”.

That is why Russia should be armed to the teeth and have the best armed forces in the world. Russia will not have a first-class Army, and there will be no territory with the state. If Russia is a “weak link” in world politics and hierarchy, then it will be torn to shreds. And no matter who it will be, Uncle Sam with his jackals, or China, or Japan, or India, or Iran, or Turkey, and maybe Arabs. This is the law of the wild, the first to eat the weak, and we are her children. Russia has no other way but to become the world leader of the emerging new technological order, where everything will be headed by society, family and people with its individual I. It is in this order, and not vice versa.

“Russia has only two allies - its army and navy” - Alexander III.

It's funny to listen when different pseudo-experts, on the sun and arms, they are teaching Putin and the country's leadership, what kind of army Russia needs and how to carry out reforms. Yes, and also remember Serdyukov. Why, he “plundered” the army! They also recall “how he failed the reform” of the Russian Armed Forces, to “boil up” the popular masses against the “regime” of Putin. Experts, you will not believe it, but Putin knows best of all in our country how, who and what reforms he carried out in the Russian Armed Forces. He also knows how they plundered the Army to Serdyukov. Experts do not know, all that they are now watching on television, transformed and effective Army, and the Russian Navy, was laid down and mostly implemented with the active participation of Serdyukov. He is a thief! For sure. And who does not steal! © “The women are to blame, all the troubles are from them!” ©

At one time, after taking hostages in Beslan, Putin said: “We did not show an understanding of the complexity and danger of the processes taking place in our own country and in the world. In any case, they could not adequately react to them. Showed a weakness. And the weak are beaten. Some want to tear off a piece of “fatter” from us, others help them. They help, believing that Russia - as one of the largest nuclear powers - still poses a threat to them. Therefore, this threat must be eliminated. And terrorism is, of course, only a tool for achieving such goals. ”

Do you think Putin forgot something? He remembers everything, and we remember everything, and our enemies know that we remember everything.

Let's return to values ​​and resources. And what is valuable in the United States? Well, they also have a lot of things: natural resources, stock exchanges, banks, but compared to Russia, they are crumbs. ...

Everything? ... Well, well, then I will tell you about another valuable resource of the West - it's debts!

Ha, you do not believe that they are valuable? In vain, they are priceless. More recently, the whole world, with bated breath, blows away and erases dust particles from its debtors. Almost the same as in the USSR before the crystal was cared for. Kooks, relax! Once again I repeat: those debts that the United States and the entire Western world have cannot be repaid in principle. Say more. It is not even talking about the main body of the debt, the West will not be able to pay even interest on its debts. The fact is that the entire economy of the West, like the states themselves, is practically bankrupt.

There is no place for their economies to grow further, the growth of the consumer economy has rested on the very same percentages, that is, the obligatory debt payments have long exceeded the wages and incomes themselves. There is simply nothing to pay. And as the majority of citizens of the West, and the states themselves. And this is even at virtually zero interest rates. In such a situation, a liberal economy cannot grow; after all, in addition to credit "buns", a person needs to feed in elementary fashion so as not to give an oak. If there is nothing to pay, then everything that can be sold is taken away from the debtor: a house, a car, sometimes states.

I won’t be surprised if the Western media will use the 3-4 of the West to defend the debtors with human organs for purely humane considerations, and the states will be able to put up “extra” land and property for auction. Here, by the way, Greece came in handy. As the birthplace of democracy, it received the right of “first night” in running in the latest achievements of the new libero-democratic dictatorship. The Golden Calf Rejoices!

You must admit that it’s necessary to somehow save debtors and their good name. Do not agree? Why and with what? And what is wrong here? And so I gave a kidney and go get indulgences. After gaining indulgences, so to speak, with a clear conscience, we ran to the bank for a loan for medicines. Just imagine what a new revolution will make the credit wheel in the history of world civilization!

Do you agree with the kidneys, but do not have any “extra” territories? So what? Ah, doesn’t this happen? It happens, for example, in the 19th century after losing Russia in the Crimean War, she had to sell Russian Alaska to the United States. Russia was then forced to sell it: it was too weak and only began to concentrate to fight Turkey, and its patron-instigator - the British Empire. A little later, the United States would have chosen Russian Alaska anyway. And so the money went to rearm the Army, Fleet and the strengthening of the Pacific coast of the Russian Empire. Russia was focusing! © Well, and you say that this does not happen. It happens.

Why not repeat this again, just the opposite. You can assume that the story will repeat, and the historical circle will close. Why shouldn't Putin throw a test pebble and now not talk insinuatingly with Obama about the sale of Alaska. So far, you can still sell it, and then after all, Alaska can just be taken away like that. What will happen to Obama after such a conversation with Putin? And the clown knows him. ... will they not forgive him? But he doesn’t care, he is already “lame”. Just give Barik the words of Putin where it is necessary, and let them decide there to sell Alaska, or even have to rub around. But, as they say, you will not escape fate!

Funny But such a development is simply inevitable. Moreover, in the situation in which the economy of the United States and other Western countries found themselves, as well as the inhabitants of these countries mortgaged and mortgaged, they are awaited by the inevitable, rapid collapse. Many, yet successful and self-sufficient shareholders and shareholders, will not even have time to figure out how they will suddenly turn into beggars, who are sitting in debt receipts.

Are you protesting? … Against what? ... Against debt and collapse. ... Ah, the West still has the Technology! ...

And what about technology? ... They are now expensive ?! Well, who argues, of course! But the question of the cost of technology is always controversial. Especially when it comes to so-called high technology companies. And still back to the collapse.

The starting shot of the financial tsunami will serve as a symbol of the current progress and prosperity of the entire Western world. ... ... Do you happen to know what character it is?

To be continued
Originator:
https://zhestokij-realist.ru/jr/vojny-byli-est-i-budut-iz-za-resursov/
102 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Dr. Bormental
        Dr. Bormental 12 December 2015 14: 33 New
        11
        Abama came to the fortune-teller, asks her - "Will the US have a war with Russia ?, she answers -" Will, "he asks," And who will win? ", She says," I don't know .. "Then Abama asks the fortune-teller - "How much will a hamburger cost in New York in 5 years?", She replies - "20 rubles."
        1. Persistent
          Persistent 12 December 2015 14: 49 New
          +5
          What will happen to Obama after such a conversation with Putin? laughing


          Drunk Abama stands near a tree and groans. Putin approaches him:
          - What is bad?
          - Yeah.
          - Do you want to go home?
          - Yeah.
          - Well, come on.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Tatyana
            Tatyana 12 December 2015 17: 02 New
            10
            From the text of the article
            It was proved to Putin with foam at the mouth that Russia was coming to an end and nothing would save it from the “demographic cross”. It’s like: “And don’t try to get the“ guarantor ”fluttering, it’s Russia’s kirdyk anyway!” The HSE nestlings from the Institute of Demography were especially zealous with such spells, and their forecasting “icon” was someone A. Vishnevsky. By the way, he is the director of this institute. The institute is not simple, but golden. Yes, it’s golden. With the light hand of Soros and many other grant exhausters from the West, the grant exhaustors of this institute lived very well, and at times even elegantly.

            I would suggest closing the HSE (Higher School of Economics) - a hotbed of Friedman's ideology of the so-called. "clean" market for capital, goods and labor and monetarism among future representatives of the pro-American colonial administration in Russia.
            FOR REFERENCE.
            The HSE Institute for Demography (IDEM) was established in February 2007. At the same time, his history as a research center began almost 20 years earlier. IDEM considers itself the ideological successor of the Center for Demography and Human Ecology (CDEC), created in 1988 in the walls of the USSR Academy of Sciences. IDEM is a scientific and educational institution, striving to ensure the fundamental nature of its scientific developments, improving the research methodology. Simultaneously with the establishment of IDEM HSE in 2007, an inter-faculty Department of Demography was created in its composition, and in 2009, the Research and Training Laboratory for Social and Demographic Policy was opened - http://www.hse.ru/demo
            And the current liberal-oriented head of the HSE Institute for Demography (IDEM) - this "Rabinovich for the Pope and Vishnevsky for Marriage" - has long been time, in the interests of national security of the Russian Federation, to blacklist the hidden enemies of Russia and the Russian people!
            But, nevertheless, Anatoly Vishnevsky in November became the 2015 prize winner of the Yegor Gaidar Foundation - non-profit organization established by the Institute for Economic Policy named after E.T. Gaidar ”and Maria Arkadyevna Strugatskaya in May 2010. To the Board of Trustees of this "Institute ..." includes G. O. Gref, A. L. Kudrin and A. B. Chubais. The Executive Director of the Institute is S. V. Prikhodko. - http://www.hse.ru/news/life/165818397.html
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Throw
              Throw 13 December 2015 02: 08 New
              -2
              The author of the article "discovered America" ​​.. laughing
              It has long been clear that all wars are not waged for money, but for:
              -Resources
              Territories
              -Power and influence (power, political, ideological and economic — sell expensive, buy cheap and thereby accumulate material wealth)

              And for money, only meat runs with machine guns, with which meat and wars of conquest wage bully
              1. Scraptor
                Scraptor 13 December 2015 05: 41 New
                0
                Of course, there is nothing in the article about the rapid decline (share) of the Russian, Slavic population in the article.
            3. Hitrovan07
              Hitrovan07 13 December 2015 19: 56 New
              -1
              A couple of days ago I wrote on the topvar - "the country should know its Heroes - they rule Russia" - it was about Herman GREF.
              Now add to it:
              2. Anatoly KUDRIN - "the best finance minister in the world ..." - isn't it funny.
              3. Anatoly CHUBAIS - "one of the best writers in the world - a couple of pages worth a couple of million American money."
              4. Sergey PRIKHODKO - "unsinkable irreplaceable deputy - in general, his own person."
              It is interesting here - liberals of the fifth column or faithful comrades of the president ???
      2. Proxima
        Proxima 12 December 2015 14: 45 New
        +4
        Unfortunately, the author is right about the "sale" of Alaska. Weakened by the Crimean War, Russia could not control this territory. There was a real threat of loss of vast lands of the Far East. Alexander II perfectly understood this. Russia has taken unprecedented steps to hold onto these territories. It was during these years that cities such as Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, and others were founded.
        1. avva2012
          avva2012 12 December 2015 14: 53 New
          +4
          Quote: Proxima
          Unfortunately, the author is right about the "sale" of Alaska.

          It’s interesting, why, no one told anyone about this? It seems to be a good teacher at school, and he read, a little later, too. But I have never met a similar version. L. Gumilyov, there was, however, a mention, but without details.
          1. aksakal
            aksakal 12 December 2015 16: 27 New
            0
            Quote: avva2012
            It’s interesting, why, no one told anyone about this? It seems to be a good teacher at school, and he read, a little later, too. But I have never met a similar version. L. Gumilyov, there was, however, a mention, but without details.
            - to read a little story is not fate? smile This is not reflected in school history in any way; in Soviet times, history does not even reflect the fact that Alaska was generally Russian, like California. I heard about California when I went to a rock opera, I don't remember, "Juno and Avos" (I may be wrong), the author is Rybnikov, Karachentsev in the title role, I learned the love story of a Russian prince and a Spanish young maiden, I was puzzled how this could be , Russians in California?, then there was no Internet, I had to stomp into the library and reading room. There were good libraries in the USSR, which are not present now. In the reading room I learned that the sale of Alaska was a necessary measure, the Americans were on the rise then, and immediately turned out to be very aggressive guys. Set aside badly lying territory for them - two fingers on the asphalt. However, as now, only the territory is not being swept away, but puppets are being planted ... Vaughn, the Malvinas (Falklands), the Americans shook off the Argentines, the Argentines for help from the strongest naval power of that time - to England, they knocked out the Amers, but they forgot to return the Malvins laughing. In any case, Alaska would have expected the same fate, the logistical shoulder was generally unbearable for supplying the Russian Army of that time ... What can I say, if the route from California to Moscow took half a year! belay Or even eight months ... To defend Alaska from the appetites of the growing overseas monster, alas, there was no chance. Selling was a good thing, even though the grandmother helped out. Well, the author of the Sabzh may be right - perhaps soon there will be an opportunity to return the sold.
            Although, frankly, why look at Alaska? All Siberia has not been mastered, the Far East, Sakhalin, Kamchatka ... Huge territories - there the human foot did not set foot in many places. This land would be distributed to those who are willing to guarantee that at least five children will be raised. If you take five to grow, get a hectare. Ten - two. Plus technical assistance in many matters - a tractor, a jeep, other land improvement equipment ...
            1. Vorobey-1
              Vorobey-1 12 December 2015 17: 34 New
              0
              my opinion is the same:
            2. avva2012
              avva2012 12 December 2015 17: 54 New
              0
              There were good libraries in the USSR, which is not now. In the reading room, I learned that the sale of Alaska was a necessary measure, the Americans then went up, and immediately turned out to be very aggressive guys. Sweep away the badly lying territory for them - two fingers on the asphalt. However, as it is now, only the territory is now not being swept aside, but puppets are being planted ... Won, Malvins (Falklands), the Americans swept the Argentines away, the Argentines for help to the strongest naval power of that time - to England, they drove the Amers Dear,aksakalReading your comment, I realized that now is a day off. But, unfortunately, you did not answer my question. Initially, I said that I had not read it, so that your statement, "is it not destiny to read history a little?", I did not understand. I hope that the weekend will pass, and you, to me, are more coherent, perhaps, if you want, explain in what sources there is a mention of such tragic events. Thanks in advance.
            3. Nick
              Nick 12 December 2015 22: 36 New
              0
              Quote: aksakal
              All Siberia has not been mastered, the Far East, Sakhalin, Kamchatka ... Vast territories - there the human foot did not set foot in many places. This land would be distributed to those who are willing to guarantee that at least five children will be raised. If you take five to grow, get a hectare. Ten - two.

              Who needs hectares where no man's foot has gone before? Where "you can fly only by helicopter". Hundreds of thousands of hectares of farmland have been abandoned in our middle zone. Although the infrastructure there is relatively developed.
              1. Condor-a
                Condor-a 15 December 2015 13: 28 New
                0
                She was leased for 99 years. And not because of the Crimean War, but because of the rapid colonization of Western Canada (British Columbia, Yukon).
        2. g1v2
          g1v2 12 December 2015 18: 37 New
          +2
          First you need to think about the return of the lost lands of the USSR. We’ll think about Alaska when at least half of the population of the Russian Federation will live on the other side of the Urals. We need to populate the Far East, and not look at Alaska. Although of course it has strategic significance. It provides access to the Arctic Ocean and to its resources for the states. But now is not up to her. Ukraine and further integration with Belarus and Kazakhstan are more pressing problems.
        3. vladimir_krm
          vladimir_krm 12 December 2015 19: 29 New
          +2
          Yes, it’s still simpler: Stratfort somehow published a map of Russia, which clearly shows that Russia always expanded to natural barriers - mountains, seas, deserts ... Otherwise, you simply can’t protect such a territory - not island England, however. Therefore, they got rid of Alaska. Well, it’s clear that if some countries did not want to, they had to let them go. But the general idea is obvious.
          1. g1v2
            g1v2 12 December 2015 20: 01 New
            0
            Well then, there would probably be a complete seizure of Canada, Scandinavia, etc. Natural barriers are just a convenient point on the border in peace treaties and a ready-made defensive line. They got rid of Alaska because England, which belonged to Canada, could squeeze it out for free. And we were unlikely to be able to defend it and sold the United States, which was then our allies. Instead of an enemy like, let an ally border us. The fact that both the ally and the enemy will both become our geopolitical opponents then no one expected, as in principle, the collapse of the empire. request
            1. vladimir_krm
              vladimir_krm 12 December 2015 21: 10 New
              -1
              Actually, it’s almost the same, but in the details ... They sold Alaska, let’s let Poland and Poland go, let’s say ...
          2. Hitrovan07
            Hitrovan07 13 December 2015 19: 57 New
            +1
            excellent comment on the article.
            You plus
        4. Max_Bauder
          Max_Bauder 12 December 2015 20: 14 New
          +3
          I will insert "my five kopecks" thoughts, evaluate you. Once Dmitry Puchkov, aka Goblin, a former operative commissioner, in his video (I posted it in one of the comments just now) says that when he was taught by the opera grandfathers, they said that when you are investigating a case and you don’t understand anything, know then it's about money. Here is the same thing. All ingenious is simple. The war is fought for resources, and even easier for money. Oil is now black gold, practically money. Everything is based on it. So the author is right. The war is, was and will be around Russia, given that there are a lot of attendants in it.
          I would like to mention one more point of the "simplification" of geopolitics. All this persecution of the Middle Eastern states, who was bombed by the United States, reminds me of a school "boss-hooligan", he beats one student, then sticks to another girl, all the boys, fuckers stand and endure, no one intercepts. And when the turn comes to Syria, again everyone is silent, like sixes, and then, unexpectedly for everyone, Russia rises to defend the honor of the girl, and naturally the "hooligan" pays all his attention to him, a new hero, because if the "hooligan" does not put "goldfinch", as he believes, then his authority will fall and others will no longer respect him. But Russia is already too late to switch on the back, either it is necessary to punch and squeeze the presumptuous "hooligan", or it was not necessary to be heroic, because if the "hooligan" wins, all the other sixes "stampede" him, and in general they will stop holding him for the man. So now it's either honor or death. There is no other choice.
      3. vovanpain
        vovanpain 12 December 2015 15: 19 New
        10
        What will happen to Obama after such a conversation with Putin? But the jester knows him. ... He will not be forgiven for this? And he doesn’t care, he’s already “lame”

        What will happen? Probably will be so.
      4. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 12 December 2015 16: 00 New
        0
        Wars have been, are and will be - because of resources
        nonsense ... wars, they’ll just be. there is humanity, there are wars. (there is a reason)
    2. 222222
      222222 12 December 2015 13: 52 New
      26
      MIKHALYCH1 (4) SU Today, 13:47
      Russia has a lot of resources ... We have other wars! "
      1. tokens2
        tokens2 12 December 2015 14: 27 New
        +4
        Wars have been, are and will be - because of resources

        here we are disagreeing.
        Not for the resources of war. War, like resources, is just a tool.
        MAN!
        What does a person have in our country a too playful concept. For the CENTURY as a kind of life expectancy for a Russian person (according to the State Statistics Committee) is clearly excessive.
        Paraphrasing a film with Bodrov:
        Do you have oil, gas, and what?
        That's all Russia has. What resources do you want.
        And man is not in man. And apparently not to be expected.
      2. Ros 56
        Ros 56 12 December 2015 14: 36 New
        +8
        Honestly, I don’t understand one thing at all. We are one country with the lowest average annual temperature, therefore, we are the first to face a shortage of energy resources to ensure the livelihoods of the population when a global collapse with hydrocarbons sets in. So why put ourselves in a deliberately deadlock situation. They say gold and foreign exchange reserves. And let's divide, gold and gold in Africa, I understand, and dollars, tomorrow, the day after tomorrow America kirdyk (it has a debt of 19 trillion) and that, paste the walls with bucks. After all, such things will begin that even the most-most cannot imagine. Gentlemen, ministers should not trade in raw materials, but establish production. Think about what will happen to your graves, how will your descendants relate to you? It is only the young who can think, but do not give a damn, I’ll leave. Where will you go from yourself if you are human? You ask those who left, what is it like in a foreign land?
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 12 December 2015 14: 13 New
      -21
      The more verbose the article, the less convincing it is, since it contains a lot of dubious arguments based on the author's purposeful assumptions.

      The author is trying to convince us that because of our natural resources, someone wants to seize our territory.
      Moreover, the author does not name a specific enemy, but writes down the entire world around us into the enemy environment.

      What is declared in the article, translated into normal language is called "COLONIAL WAR", but in the absence of a specific enemy demonstrating his intentions, this declaration turns into meaningless purposeful intimidation.
      Colonial wars are the 16th - 18th centuries, when many countries (including Russia) replenished their income by seizing and exploiting foreign territories.

      Now the situation has fundamentally changed, and countries, taking advantage of the opportunities for cooperation, within the framework of globalization, are developing their economies without any wars, the result of which is unpredictable from the point of view of their existence in general.

      It is clear that the article aims to justify once again the militarization of the Russian economy, which is based on domestic problems, rather than foreign policy.
      1. yuriy55
        yuriy55 12 December 2015 14: 33 New
        +1
        Pour my glass of "truth" ...

        Wars are unleashed not so much because of natural resources, but because of the right to lead a parasitic lifestyle, printing green or colorful papers, creating illusory values ​​and problem morality, replacing a person’s need for physical and spiritual food by fomenting passions and phobias, promoting drug dope, leading away from reality into a dream world ...

        Japan is a poor country for natural resources, which does not prevent it from getting along in the modern world without waging war, due to its high capacity for work and national asceticism ...

        But, such hard work is very difficult to achieve. And to take part in military conflicts as a leader and sponsor (creditor), "throwing the bone" to one or the other side, is the lot of the "wisest" ...

        Divide and conquer-divide and rule... yes
      2. EvgNik
        EvgNik 12 December 2015 14: 48 New
        +5
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        article aims to justify once again the militarization of the Russian economy

        Do you disagree with the fact that the country's defense should be strengthened? "He who does not want to feed his army feeds someone else's." Do you disagree with Napoleon? Or maybe disarm and open the borders altogether?
        "Now the situation has radically changed and countries, taking advantage of the opportunities for cooperation, within the framework of globalization, are developing their economies without any wars."
        This is a very dubious statement. And what is happening in Ukraine and the Middle East? Is this just "cooperation within the framework of globalization"? You are either a naive person or a provocateur. Both are criminal.
        1. tokens2
          tokens2 13 December 2015 12: 51 New
          0
          EvgNik
          Do you disagree with the fact that the country's defense should be strengthened? "He who does not want to feed his army feeds someone else's"

          Even great phrases can become obsolete over time.
          Who and how today feeds the Russian people?
          Who is the drug manufacturer in pharmacies?
          Who is the manufacturer of bulk goods?
          And finally. Who builds housing in Russia?
          The arms race is a kind of conquest. Where the defeated people build their own cage for themselves, they support the bolt with a powerful club. From the inside.
          There is no doubt that defense power is important. Maintain balance.
          Napoleon was defeated not only by first-class European armies.
          But also from the Spanish partisans, who, in general, had little sense in martial art.
          So ... in the current realities, the winner is the one who feeds, yes, an alien army winked
          such a paradox.
      3. B.T.V.
        B.T.V. 12 December 2015 14: 56 New
        +4
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Now the situation has fundamentally changed, and countries, taking advantage of the opportunities for cooperation, within the framework of globalization, are developing their economies without any wars, the result of which is unpredictable from the point of view of their existence in general.


        And what is happening in the Middle East, you, as you evaluate ?!
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag 12 December 2015 15: 50 New
          +2
          Quote: B.T.W.
          And what is happening in the Middle East,

          "Pipeline" wars
          1. Condor-a
            Condor-a 15 December 2015 13: 35 New
            0
            And why cut heads? Oil from this will not increase.
            Most wars for another reason, the Crimean Khanate in Russia and Poland did not go for resources.
      4. Nikita74
        Nikita74 12 December 2015 15: 07 New
        +2
        If the colonial wars are 16-18 centuries, then what is Turkey doing now?
      5. question
        question 12 December 2015 15: 11 New
        +1
        So what? Whatever you call the war, it is still a war! Though colonial, at least for resources.
      6. mikh-korsakov
        mikh-korsakov 12 December 2015 15: 43 New
        +5
        I quote: Now the situation has radically changed and countries, taking advantage of the opportunities for cooperation, within the framework of globalization, are developing their economies without any wars. Uh-huh, Iraq, Libya, Syria. True, in the era of TV and the Internet, it is not necessary to use force to seize territories "You don't need a penny for a fool ..." But still the dull ones: Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria can be bombed. "taking advantage of opportunities for cooperation."
      7. Karlovar
        Karlovar 12 December 2015 17: 38 New
        0
        Throughout the entire history of mankind, wars have been fought not only for material resources, but also for human resources (hard workers, soldiers, artisans, scientists) ... At the new technological turn of history, nothing has changed fundamentally! And the current Western liberal-democratic economic model is nothing more than a veiled neocolonial system: the countries of the golden billion pump out all the juices from the rest of the world, exploit the population of third world countries for the meager pay for their labor, take away their natural resources for nothing, and create all conditions for brain flow from the third world to the countries of the golden billion (a kind of contribution to intellectual capital), which puts an end to the development of science and technology in third countries. And Germany and France, at all without leaving the cash register, have established colonies within the EU in the person of the Young Europeans ( Baltic tigers, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Poland, Croatia, Portugal, Greece ...) ... EU
        whether Negros, Indians, Arabs carried out pots for Anglo-Saxons or Germans before, now Ukrainians, Moldavians, Poles, Romanians, Bulgarians, etc. do it.
      8. Jozhkin Cat
        Jozhkin Cat 12 December 2015 20: 06 New
        0
        ah malad! it’s funny how, just like a liberal from the rostrum, already a tear rolled and wanted to hit angry
      9. Hitrovan07
        Hitrovan07 13 December 2015 20: 03 New
        0
        You messed up the obvious things.
        There is no development of the Western concept of an economy without wars in the modern world.
        NONE.
        This has already been repeatedly discussed (including on this resource).
        The Western economy is growing ONLY by seizing other people's resources.
    4. I am Russian
      I am Russian 12 December 2015 14: 40 New
      +1
      Here is such unpleasant news !! sad

      News from the militia of New Russia
      12.12.15. Urgent message from the Russian spring.

      "In Stakhanov, after the wedding, the Cossack ataman Pavel Dremov was killed. In the area of ​​Stakhanov, the well-known commander of the militia, the commander of the Platov regiment, the Cossack ataman Pavel Dremov was killed. This is reported by the special correspondent of" Russian Spring "in the LPR. On December 11, Pavel Dremov got married was killed after a wedding at the Nika restaurant. On the way from Stakhanov to Pervomaisk, his car was blown up. "

      A message from the News Front agency: "According to information from journalists, on the Pervomaisk - Stakhanov highway, a car was blown up in which the commander of the Lunansky Cossacks, the legendary Pavel Dremov, was. According to information from the scene, an explosion took place on the highway, the driver was seriously injured, Pavel Dremov died on the spot. The editorial staff of the News Front news agency is checking this information, a film crew has left for the scene. "
      1. atalef
        atalef 12 December 2015 16: 41 New
        -3
        Quote: I-Russian
        After the wedding, a Cossack chieftain Pavel Dremov was killed in Stakhanov. In the vicinity of Stakhanov, a famous militia commander, Platov regiment commander, Cossack chieftain Pavel Dremov

        And is he still in the DPR-LPR?
        I thought I was back a long time ago.
    5. sober
      sober 12 December 2015 16: 27 New
      0
      and here is another BLUE
  2. iouris
    iouris 12 December 2015 13: 48 New
    +9
    And why did we (Russia) then leave from everywhere and disarm.
    Quote
    “Wherever the Russian flag is hoisted, it should not be lowered there already.”
    Nicholas I
    1. 222222
      222222 12 December 2015 14: 01 New
      13
      iouris (1) RU Today, 13:48
      And why did we (Russia) then leave from everywhere and disarm.
      Quote
      “Wherever the Russian flag is hoisted, it should not be lowered there already.”
      Nicholas I ""
      ... because the upper echelons of the state apparatus and the party were struck by the virus of the petty-bourgeois element (creeping counter-revolution .. mold ..) thirsting for a change in the form of ownership of the main means of production, and as a result, this handful of them robbed the whole country and their people .. They were not interested interests of the state. "Take sovereignty - One shouted - as much as you can take away"
  3. onix757
    onix757 12 December 2015 13: 49 New
    -20
    As you can see, the “Putin regime” is slowly, but confidently, pursuing a course towards the revival of Russia.

    Further reading makes no sense. The author hit into propaganda.
    1. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 12 December 2015 14: 04 New
      +8
      So what? Show me an absolutely impartial author, at least one? All authors have their own views on the problem, this is called subjective perception.
    2. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 12 December 2015 14: 04 New
      0
      What kind of propaganda can there be when they themselves make anti-advertising for themselves. Oil is getting cheaper, gas is getting more expensive. The aircraft are shot down by the Turks, and we hit the igil.
    3. Bosk
      Bosk 12 December 2015 14: 17 New
      +8
      This "Putin regime" has many problems, and to be honest, any government in Russia will have such problems, well, this is the mentality of the Russian people to be dissatisfied with the government and you can't do anything about it ... The main thing that Putin did for Russia is that the Russians became proud of their homeland, but after "Gorby" and uncle Yeltsin it was ... oh, how not easy.
      1. I am Russian
        I am Russian 12 December 2015 14: 54 New
        +2


        Agitation and propaganda from 12.12.2015
      2. sanyavolhv
        sanyavolhv 12 December 2015 23: 42 New
        -2
        Labvacar, health.
        there are not enough heroes in Russian. but the heroes are coming .... The author mentioned Serdyukov. HERO so by the way !!! stole as much as possible, for which he did not sit down.
        and now the arguments. which of the living now will climb the barricades in shorts from Yudashkin ???? who? show me such a general. and this simple guy became the Minister of Defense, put on a TRUSEL and climbed into everyone's eyes.
        and then they tell me different "smart" ones with big stars, and look how the west's eyes climbed onto their foreheads when they saw ...
        it was Serdyuk who danced a striptease to them, blocked the work of the military-industrial complex with his ass, it was he who set the Smoke curtain, it was he who arranged a distracting maneuver with all parts of the body, averted his eyes and brains to fools in the west.
        tell me my native Russian are you fools too? I think they just helped Serdyukov. portrayed righteous anger.
        Good luck to Vladimir’s son Vladimir in other cover operations !!!
    4. avdkrd
      avdkrd 12 December 2015 15: 04 New
      +2
      Quote: onix757
      As you can see, the “Putin regime” is slowly, but confidently, pursuing a course towards the revival of Russia.

      Further reading makes no sense. The author hit into propaganda.

      Where did you see the propaganda? Firstly, the car expresses its point of view and does not claim the title of "Guru", and secondly, it is a simple statement of facts. Having replaced Yeltsin, it was Putin who carried out reforms that made it possible to multiply the standard of living in Russia, which ensured the demographic growth.
      1. onix757
        onix757 12 December 2015 15: 21 New
        -3
        secondly it is a simple statement of facts

        What are the facts? The entire article is built from eulogies around the president.
        Having replaced Yeltsin, it was Putin who carried out the reforms that allowed him to multiply raise the standard of living in Russia

        Oh how! Tell us about these fantastic reforms, otherwise I don’t remember a single law in the interests of the people.
        1. fisherman2
          fisherman2 12 December 2015 22: 54 New
          0
          Sidish at home on the couch-poking claudia = what you yourself have done in life for those who are nearby. Your authorities are to blame. Who is paying you?
          1. Was mammoth
            Was mammoth 12 December 2015 23: 25 New
            +1
            Quote: fisherman2
            Sidish at home on the couch-poking claudia = what you yourself have done in life for those who are nearby. Your authorities are to blame. Who is paying you?

            SidishЬ at home on the couch, pokeЬ Claudia, that you (you) yourself in lifeИ Сdid for those nearby. The authorities are to blame for everything. Who pays you?
            Do you think a patriot should know and love his language?
            I get paid a pension. For conscientious work and honest service.
            For those around? All that I can do.
          2. Ros 56
            Ros 56 13 December 2015 09: 20 New
            0
            Fisherman2, but turn the question around, and who pays these authorities? People generally make money. No need to tell tales of good power that provides someone with something. You still cry how hard it is for officials, what small salaries and pensions they have.
          3. Ros 56
            Ros 56 13 December 2015 09: 26 New
            0
            Fisherman2, but turn the question around, and who pays these authorities? People generally make money. No need to tell tales of good power that provides someone with something. You still cry how hard it is for officials, what small salaries and pensions they have.
    5. Nikita74
      Nikita74 12 December 2015 15: 15 New
      +1
      Advocacy should be! Tired of listening from all sides that in our country the government has one crook! Who then do you vote for in the election? Against everyone???
      1. Was mammoth
        Was mammoth 12 December 2015 23: 12 New
        +1
        Quote: nikita74
        Who then do you vote for in the election? Against everyone???

        I have another question - why are you voting for someone?
        "Against all" - canceled. And for a long time, so that the elections could be held in any weather. Because the citizens of Russia sometimes simply ignore the elections, so that one official who comes to the elections can decide for the whole people. Wake up, think and vote.
        Quote: nikita74
        Tired of listening from all sides that in our country the government has one crook

        Well, why not? You and I, already two honest ones. Let's choose the honest ones as deputies and everything will go "in a bundle."
  4. moskowit
    moskowit 12 December 2015 13: 51 New
    +5
    The next world war will be because of what is necessary for a person, not because of oil, gas and other "nonsense", but for a necessary component of human existence, simple WATER! The world's reserves are located in our country!
  5. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 12 December 2015 13: 54 New
    +9
    Roughly speaking, the WAR against Russia is in full swing, only it has not yet reached the "hot" phase, but the "sparks" are already flying, gaining their power, and Russia is here, not an INITIATOR, but a FORCED "player". request
    1. 222222
      222222 12 December 2015 14: 06 New
      +9
      Shoigu: Comrade Supreme Commander-in-Chief! Dear colleagues!
      The trend continues to worsen the military-political situation in the world, especially in Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East. There is a consistent expansion of the NATO bloc. In a relatively short time, it expanded almost twice, replenished with twelve new members. Today, Montenegro, Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Ukraine are actively preparing for joining the bloc. Finland, Sweden, Serbia and Moldova are involved in the sphere of interests of the Alliance.
      In this year alone, in the Baltic countries, Poland and Romania, the NATO contingent has increased by eight times by aircraft, and by 13 times by the number of military personnel. Up to 300 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles were additionally deployed on their territory, and the Aegis Eshor missile defense systems were deployed in Romania and Poland.
      About 200 American nuclear aerial bombs are concentrated in the territories of Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, the Federal Republic of Germany and Turkey, and their renewal is planned. There are 310 carrier aircraft in varying degrees of readiness.
      In order to achieve the information superiority of NATO countries over Russia, a cybersecurity center will be deployed in Tallinn, and a center of excellence in strategic propaganda in Riga.
      The zones of influence of the Islamic State are expanding. Militants seized about 70 percent of Syria and most parts of Iraq. The number of terrorists is more than 60 thousand people. There is a threat of the transfer of their actions to Central Asia and the Caucasus.
      In the spring, the Japanese parliament changed the status of self-defense forces and granted them the right to operate outside the state.
      Under the current conditions, the Russian Armed Forces must have the necessary potential to protect the country's sovereignty. In order to accomplish this task, the Ministry of Defense, together with the federal executive authorities, has developed a defense plan for 2016–2020, which was approved by the President of the country in November. It takes into account all the challenges and threats in the military sphere, envisages ensuring the defense of the state in all forecasted options for the emergence of military conflicts with the participation of the Russian Federation.
      (11 12 2015 An expanded meeting of the board of the Ministry of Defense. Speech of the Defense Ministry of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation)
    2. venaya
      venaya 12 December 2015 14: 19 New
      +3
      Quote: ia-ai00
      WAR against Russia, in full swing ...
      Russia is here not INITIATOR, COMPELLED "player"

      If you could only imagine how right you were!
      The war has been going on, and for more than one millennium, but this topic is not allowed to me here, on this site, even at least partially to reveal, there are too many "interested" ...
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 December 2015 13: 56 New
    +5
    I agree with the author as a whole. It is the war for resources that is now going on. AGAINST Russia, of course. So far, ideological and financial. It will go hot as soon as they can not be afraid of a retaliatory strike by the strategic nuclear forces.
  7. Federal
    Federal 12 December 2015 14: 03 New
    12
    War is a given for Russia. Almost all the world conquerors and tyrants, the last 1000 years, have visited these territories. They came to the vast expanses of our country not as welcome guests, but as conquerors. All the trouble in the location of Russia, it is located in the center of Eurasia and its infinite wealth.

    Whoever comes into us with a sword will perish by the sword. On this stood and is the Russian land! (Pavlenko N.A.)
    From the feature film "Alexander Nevsky"
  8. pilot bin-bom
    pilot bin-bom 12 December 2015 14: 04 New
    +2
    WHAT'S NOW HAPPENING IS THE TOUCHED BOSS TOYS FOR AUTHORITY, FOR RESOURCES, WHICH IN turn, will lead to the destruction of the EXISTING ECOLOGICAL BALANCE ON THE PLANET. Imagine how much greenhouse gas emissions are in the Syria-Turkey region right now. By the way, at the latest global gatherings on climate, they somehow did not pay attention to this.
    At the same time, there is already a fundamental alternative - hydrogen.
    Hydrogen is a very promising type of fuel due to its high energy density - 1 kg of hydrogen has the same energy as 2,8 kg of gasoline and environmental friendliness, since its use does not lead to the formation of CO2 emissions that affect the environment. At the same time, the reserves of this type of fuel are practically inexhaustible, and the methods of industrial production are easily feasible, with the cost of mass production from 1 to 4 US dollars per 1 kg (depending on the method of production). ECOLOGICAL PURE METHODS FOR PRODUCING HYDROGEN, MAKING THESE PRODUCTION INDEPENDENT ON OIL IMPORT, ARE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED. One kilogram of hydrogen is enough, on average, for a run of about 100 kilometers, while the cost of mileage will cost an average of 2,76 US dollars for Toyota Prius, and 2,99 US dollars for a Tesla Model.
    That is, now the cost of hydrogen as a fuel is lower than the cost of oil, and hydrogen production can be realized practically anywhere in the world, although it is best of all at hydroelectric power stations - there it will be even cheaper.
    1. pilot bin-bom
      pilot bin-bom 12 December 2015 14: 08 New
      +2
      At the airport of Berlin to them. Willy Brandt in 2014 opened a "green" hydrogen hub (GreenHydrogenHub) - a unique multi-functional refueling for cars and buses. The uniqueness of this installation is that hydrogen for refueling through columns (separately for buses, separately for cars) is produced directly on the spot - using an electrolyzer with a capacity of 500 kW and a capacity of more than 200 kilograms of gas per day, which is enough to refuel about 50 vehicles on hydrogen fuel cells. In turn, the electrolyzer is powered by a solar collector - a panel of light cells. In addition to the tanks for compressed gas, the station includes a low-temperature storage of solid hydrogen with a capacity of 100 kg, expanding the functionality of refueling. Currently, there are 20 hydrogen gas stations in Germany, and by 2023 it is planned to build 400.
      Now the world is on the verge of a fundamentally new era in energy - hydrogen energy. Oh dean, a trifle is a sentence to the oil industry (oil is not needed as fuel) - and influential bosses who have made billions of dollars in oil will not do it
      1. pilot bin-bom
        pilot bin-bom 12 December 2015 14: 10 New
        +2
        The efficiency of power plants using fuel cells ranges from 60% to 90% (depending on the scheme of the power plant). In combination with electric engines, hydrogen fuel cells are ideal engines for vehicles, especially automobiles, which need 2-4 times less fuel than cars with the most modern mass-produced internal combustion engines. The constant tightening of the requirements of US federal standards and EURO standards for the content of harmful substances in the exhaust gases of vehicle engines leads to a complication and, accordingly, to an increase in the cost of the design of an internal combustion engine. At the same time, the requirements of the Euro-6 standard are practically limiting for internal combustion engines and achieving zero toxicity in exhaust gases, from the point of view of the costs of engine production, reagents and fuel cleaning, is commercially unreasonable. Considering that the technology of compact storage of electric energy has not yet been developed, which allows a car to drive as much as it can travel at a single gas station, the technology for producing electric engines with hydrogen fuel cells is certainly promising and innovative.
    2. mikh-korsakov
      mikh-korsakov 12 December 2015 15: 58 New
      +2
      Hydrogen + catalyst + metal cylinder for storing hydrogen + explosiveness is much higher than gasoline - hence the special precautions for transportation. To make sure, compare the flame of a gas burner and a hydrogen one (the latter in the DIP detector provides thermal decomposition of almost any known organic substance).
      1. pilot bin-bom
        pilot bin-bom 12 December 2015 18: 27 New
        +1
        Within the framework of the CUTE (Clean Urban Transport for Europe) program of the European Union, Mercedes-Benz launched the first series of 2003 Mercedes-Benz Citaro buses with a hydrogen fuel cell propulsion system in 36.

        During the implementation of the CUTE program, the following objectives were fulfilled: testing hydrogen transport, testing gas stations, testing hydrogen production technologies, testing the existing hydrogen infrastructure, analyzing the risks and benefits of hydrogen technologies.
        From 2003 to 2006, buses traveled more than 2 million km and carried about 6 million passengers. The cities of the European Union were selected with different climatic conditions.

        You seem a little off topic. Turnkey technologies - already proven - Air Liquide, Linde, OMV, Shell and Total have now set up a joint venture in Berlin, H2 MOBILITY Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG ”, which will build an extensive network of hydrogen filling stations in Germany. The planned investment of the project is 400 million euros. By 2023, it is planned to increase the number of hydrogen refueling stations in Germany from 20 to 400. It is planned that the hydrogen refueling station will be part of the new conventional refueling company Total, which also includes devices for refueling electric vehicles.

        Solid oxide zirconium-ceramic fuel cells (solid oxide) and solid polymer proton exchange membranes with platinum electrodes (solid polymer) are the most suitable for generating electricity according to the current state of the development of fuel cell technologies.

        For solid oxide fuel cells - in principle, a catalyst is not needed - well, there is no platinum in them. For this - I answer well, as the author of two patents on the fuel cell.
        Metal cylinders - so it is for suckers - KPG-4 (CNG-4) - a non-metallic liner reinforced with continuous fibers impregnated with resin (fully composite).
  9. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 12 December 2015 14: 06 New
    +7
    Yeah, 2% of the population has 25% of the resources ... These guys just won’t get off of us for sure. Or they’ll peck, or they’ll get a quality snout, as they always did.
  10. Neophyte
    Neophyte 12 December 2015 14: 09 New
    +4
    Surprising is the fact that Russia-Russia has existed for 2 thousand years? Waves of conquerors constantly moved from the West and East to us? And this, everything happened on the Russian Plain! War, of course, is inevitable! Too tidy resources for our enemies! At the same time, is the speculative exchange rate of the ruble incomprehensible to the sane people of Russia? If you recalculate and evaluate the total value of all the resources of Russia, then our one ruble should cost a hundred green pieces of paper!
  11. onix757
    onix757 12 December 2015 14: 12 New
    +2
    It turns out that the casket just opens, fabulous natural resources is the true reason why the United States declared psychological war against Russia. And it started not at all today or even yesterday: all the 90s and the beginning of the 2000s Russia fought with Uncle Sam's “sent Cossacks”. These were his people, not Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other vassal transmission links. The main one is always the one who orders “music”.
    That is precisely why Russia must be armed to the teeth and have the best armed forces in the world. Russia will not have a first-class Army, nor will there be territory with a state. If Russia is a “weak link” in world politics and hierarchy, then it will be torn to shreds.


    Well, in one of the "sent Cossacks" no one excommunicated the trough, and in two, the Russian Federation does not need to be conquered, since it is vitally necessary to sell resources, but now they give it away for nothing.
  12. tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 14: 24 New
    -7
    Well, living in Moscow and St. Petersburg, it’s good to think that they have 25% of the world's reserves and distribute them in their favor. Great-power chauvinism is ruining you.
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 12 December 2015 14: 37 New
      +8
      Well, living in Moscow and St. Petersburg it’s good to think that they have 25% of world reserves
      I would say so. Well, living in Novosibirsk and Yakutsk, it’s good to think that they have 25% of the world's reserves.
      Tell me, "who are the unihs?" Are there zoologists to define a species-genus, a commentator?
      1. Tatarus
        Tatarus 12 December 2015 15: 10 New
        +3
        Quote: avva2012
        "and who are unih?


        UNI and UNAS are two subspecies of pseudo-sapiens hamadryl. Do not differ from each other. But they are terribly proud of their self-names. laughing
        1. avva2012
          avva2012 12 December 2015 15: 48 New
          +2
          UNI and UNAS are two subspecies of pseudo-sapiens hamadryl. Do not differ from each other. But they are terribly proud of their self-names.
          Thanks, now, I know there are two of them. You don’t know, is it being treated? Do you already have vaccinations? And then, suddenly bite. belay
  13. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 12 December 2015 14: 24 New
    +1
    In my opinion, at the present stage of the development of science and modern technologies, the thesis about the war for minerals does not correspond to the development of modern economies. Yes, minerals are needed, but if they cannot be used competently, then the standard of living will not advance higher than in the 19th century, the century of steam engines and electricity. Now is the time for the highest technology and large markets. If a country even has all the minerals for the production of any type of product, but does not have a global market for these products for this, then this country is not able to compete with the same countries, with developed markets. And in the economy, there is a global strengthening of transnational monopolies, competition with which not a single country, and even such a large one as Russia, can withstand. World capital needs markets and war will go to take control of more and more world territories and countries for this.
  14. avva2012
    avva2012 12 December 2015 14: 26 New
    +5
    One thing I want to ask the author, how long can we wait until such a state of the West? After all, gradually, again, it is proposed to be patient. Here, here, and the west, will crawl on its knees. They say that they will not attack directly, we have de nuclear weapons, and therefore it remains not to lose in a hybrid war. "Be patient!", But how much ?! "And they held out for the day, and already stood for the night."
  15. parusnik
    parusnik 12 December 2015 14: 31 New
    11
    The war is already going on ... and for a long time ... it began with the collapse of the USSR, when many territories, the Baltic States, Ukraine, and other republics were torn away from the country ... having seized these territories "peacefully", the war spread to the territory of Russia ... Chechen companies ... Yes , the third world is now without fronts, without major army operations ... but it goes ..
  16. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 12 December 2015 14: 34 New
    10
    .All the trouble in the location of Russia, it is located in the center of Eurasia and its infinite wealth ...

    I would not call it a disaster. In general, I want to answer the conversations of some individuals (also articles, books, games, films, etc.) that expose Russian people and, especially, our ancestors as drunkards, fools, simpletons (hahaha): why are our ancestors simpletons and fools, if at all times in all countries of the war almost always been fought over resources: land, minerals, water, food, and now we have so much that everyone just licks? On the contrary: our ancestors are the smartest and most economical people: not only didn’t they lose what they inherited from ancient times, but they multiplied and still managed the population by an order of magnitude smaller than invaders, all this not only to keep, but also to grow territory at the expense of these same invaders.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 12 December 2015 15: 06 New
      +4
      Quote: S_Baykala
      our ancestors are the smartest and most economical people: not only didn’t they lose what they inherited from ancient times, but they multiplied and still managed the population by an order of magnitude smaller than invaders, all this not only to hold on to, but also to grow territory due to these same invaders

      I agree. Drunkards and fools will not create and keep such a country. Our misfortune is that from time to time there are rulers who squander the acquired ancestors. In any family, not without a freak.
  17. 3axap82
    3axap82 12 December 2015 14: 34 New
    +9
    Today, tomorrow, our economy will die. Give the author to Alaska! But then what would despise the environmental laws of the United States (as the former owner then) to start producing oil there !? Some US senators offer to sell us Alaska so that we would develop an oil field there and sell oil to the states. So the idea is not new.
    The technologies of the USA and the EU are what ultimately work for all 5 columns in all states, or just for what thieves in power steal. Having a lot of dollars gives you access to the best medicine, yachts, airplanes, buying islands in the ocean, villas. And the main thing is that the owners of all this "good" bought with stolen money are protected by 10 US fleets and the entire side of NATO. The dream of the money-grubber to steal away and live well.
    Russia does not produce those coveted luxury goods, does not have such medicine, nor such an army, so thieves will always run from here to there and, accordingly, treat our country as a feeding trough. Any new representative of our government will steal and run away to "paradise".
    Until we have a powerful production and scientific potential, we will only be an instrument of world politics, and not its subject. All countries will betray and sell us. Because we have nothing to offer them in the long run. Well, they will earn money on trade (rent) with us and will start spending it on US and EU products. Let's help them in hostilities, they will end and the "friendship" will end.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  18. Baloo
    Baloo 12 December 2015 14: 37 New
    +6
    It turns out that the casket just opens, fabulous natural resources is the true reason why the United States declared psychological war against Russia. And it started not at all today or even yesterday: all the 90s and the beginning of the 2000s Russia fought with Uncle Sam's “sent Cossacks”. These were his people, not Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other vassal transmission links. The main one is always the one who orders “music”.
    That is precisely why Russia must be armed to the teeth and have the best armed forces in the world. Russia will not have a first-class Army, nor will there be territory with a state. If Russia is a “weak link” in world politics and hierarchy, then it will be torn to shreds. And it doesn’t matter who it is, Uncle Sam with his jackals, or China, or Japan, or India, or Iran, or Turkey, or maybe Arabs. This is the law of the wild, the weak are the first to eat, and we are her children. Russia has no other way but to become the world leader of the emerging new technological order, where everything will be headed by society, family and a person with his individual self.


    Alas, not everyone from the "pepsikola and hamburger" generation thinks about it. Why? Because this generation has grown up to the accompaniment of how bad everything is, what a bad country and how good it is abroad, there is only entertainment on TV, American films and cartoons, endless dirt on the country from the lips of traitors. Hence this nihilism, infa from ex-matzah and bed is more significant to them. Negativity causes not outrage, but banter. Perverted understanding of reality.
    The desire to grab now, and not the growth of professionalism and competence, I do not see the desire to improve around me. not all of them, but alas ...
    Therefore, it is important to educate a generation of two thousandth, when the country rose from its knees and people began to respect themselves and their country. Maybe I went too far, but ... hi
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 12 December 2015 14: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: Balu
      Therefore, it is important to educate a generation of two thousandth, when the country rose from its knees and people began to respect themselves and their country. Maybe I went too far, but ...

      Rather, they did not catch up. Look at the root colleague, unfortunately, that's it. And I don’t know what to do with the non-fishy meat generation.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 12 December 2015 14: 39 New
    +5
    For the West or large industrial countries, Russia is virgin land! Countless riches of everything in the world. All our neighbors and not only dream of possessing them. For us, to possess the strongest army in the world is simply vital and it is clear as God's day! We need to be careful about all kinds of provocations so as not to go on occasion and not weaken yourself in vain. But you have to make very important decisions in geopolitics!
    1. Michael_59
      Michael_59 13 December 2015 08: 05 New
      0
      Quote: dchegrinec
      and it’s as clear as God's day!


      It is important for us to have a power that connects the future of our children with life and work in Russia, rather than knocking it down in England or Israel - then everything will be there - the army, the navy, roads, education, science, medicine, and mechanical engineering , and agriculture is all-all-all.
  21. Stanislas
    Stanislas 12 December 2015 14: 42 New
    +3
    According to him, “thanks to the efforts of many courageous people, the struggle for the observance of human rights continues in Russia”
    And our ambassador to the United States, interestingly, reminds them of the genocide of the Indians, of the heroic struggle of black people for their rights, of the national liberation struggle around the world against the neocolonial policies of Fushington, etc.?
  22. avva2012
    avva2012 12 December 2015 14: 44 New
    +3
    Quote: S_Baykala
    All the trouble in the location of Russia, it is located in the center of Eurasia and its infinite wealth ...

    Yes, yes, and what, all this territory gathered herself, surrounded herself by drunks and idlers, defended herself? Drunkards and lazy people, apparently, some kind of mystical punishment for this territory, right? So, gentlemen, the Germans, the British, I do not say, Liechtenstein? You, then, yes, hardworking and not drinking, especially to look at your current territories. wassat
    1. S_Baykala
      S_Baykala 12 December 2015 15: 43 New
      +1
      there would be one more nation, which is considered the most intelligent around the world, I would add.
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 12 December 2015 15: 51 New
        +1
        there would be one more nation, which is considered the most intelligent around the world, I would add. It’s scary to ask, aren't the Jews ....? recourse
        1. S_Baykala
          S_Baykala 12 December 2015 16: 00 New
          +1
          I did not say that stop . repeat laughing laughing laughing

          Greetings, fellow countryman! He lived in Angarsk. Himself from Irkutsk. hi
          1. avva2012
            avva2012 12 December 2015 16: 14 New
            +1
            Greetings, fellow countryman! He lived in Angarsk. Himself from Irkutsk Glad, very glad, fellow countryman! "Irkutsk - the middle of the earth", as in the song! hi Naturally, all doubts disappeared. We, somehow not accepted. As far as I understand, now you live in another region? Ah, we have winter. It's warm, true, but it's fixable. Have to leave the computer for thirty minutes. Yes, about which I shall meet again. drinks
        2. S_Baykala
          S_Baykala 12 December 2015 16: 00 New
          +1
          I did not say that stop . repeat laughing laughing laughing

          Greetings, fellow countryman! He lived in Angarsk. Himself from Irkutsk. hi
  23. 0000
    0000 12 December 2015 14: 50 New
    +5
    ____________________ REASON FOR ALL WARRIORS __________________
  24. tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 14: 50 New
    -6
    avva2012. On "this territory", as you wrote, other peoples live and have lived before you. When did your ancestors come to the Angara? Unless you are drilled.
    1. S_Baykala
      S_Baykala 12 December 2015 15: 51 New
      +7
      So they live and now, on its territory. And they have equal rights with others. Instead of sitting on a reservation or lying in the ground, carved out by "noble and civilized" American or British (French, Spanish) settlers. Who throughout their lives preach their human rights - the rights of the "white man".
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 12 December 2015 15: 57 New
        +3
        Instead of sitting on a reservation or lying in the ground, carved out by the "noble and civilized" I agree with you. Only mixed marriages in Siberia can be counted, you will be tortured to spoil the ink. And, after all, this is an indicator. Joint children, with a subhuman, will not work, no matter how hard you try. Here, they say, "if you want to live happily, marry a Buryat woman."
  25. avva2012
    avva2012 12 December 2015 14: 56 New
    +1
    Quote: I-Russian
    Here is such unpleasant news !! sad

    News from the militia of New Russia
    12.12.15. Urgent message from the Russian spring.

    "In Stakhanov, after the wedding, the Cossack ataman Pavel Dremov was killed. In the area of ​​Stakhanov, the well-known commander of the militia, the commander of the Platov regiment, the Cossack ataman Pavel Dremov was killed. This is reported by the special correspondent of" Russian Spring "in the LPR. On December 11, Pavel Dremov got married was killed after a wedding at the Nika restaurant. On the way from Stakhanov to Pervomaisk, his car was blown up. "

    A message from the News Front agency: "According to information from journalists, on the Pervomaisk - Stakhanov highway, a car was blown up in which the commander of the Lunansky Cossacks, the legendary Pavel Dremov, was. According to information from the scene, an explosion took place on the highway, the driver was seriously injured, Pavel Dremov died on the spot. The editorial staff of the News Front news agency is checking this information, a film crew has left for the scene. "

    The Kingdom of heaven. Sorry. Sorry. But, after all, obviously, something is being prepared from that side, and in the coming days.
    1. onix757
      onix757 12 December 2015 15: 01 New
      +2
      After the wedding, a Cossack chieftain Pavel Dremov was killed in Stakhanov. In the region of Stakhanov, a famous militia commander, Platov regiment commander, Cossack chieftain Pavel Dremov were killed.

      It is sad, but expected, and emphasizing a friend .. This is the question of what our government is seeking in New Russia and Ukraine in particular.
  26. avva2012
    avva2012 12 December 2015 14: 58 New
    +1
    Quote: tumen
    avva2012. On "this territory", as you wrote, other peoples live and have lived before you. When did your ancestors come to the Angara? Unless you are drilled.

    And if they drill, then what?
  27. OlegV
    OlegV 12 December 2015 15: 02 New
    +2
    ..... Russia will not have a first-class Army, there will be no territory with the state. If Russia will be the "weak link" in world politics and hierarchy, then it will be torn to shreds ....

    After reading this, I immediately remembered the time, the mid-90s ...
    it would seem that this was where there was an opportunity to tear Russia to shreds, but did not tear and did not try ..... but after all there were times, but I don’t want to remember.
    the salary was not given for 3-4 months, there was no kerosene for flights, the young officers who arrived, after serving for 2-3 years, left for civilian life ....
    1. Karlovar
      Karlovar 12 December 2015 18: 22 New
      0
      By the mid-90s, everything had almost been torn, from kerosene, and 3-4 months of sn, and the officers were thrown, and pensioners .... Their mistake is that they thought in the euphoria of victory that they had torn enough and finally ... ..
  28. Normal ok
    Normal ok 12 December 2015 15: 06 New
    +6
    It is also necessary to add to this article that 75% of Russia's resources belong to only 1% of its citizens.
    1. Alexey Lobanov
      Alexey Lobanov 12 December 2015 20: 45 New
      +1
      Quote: Normal ok
      It is also necessary to add to this article that 75% of Russia's resources belong to only 1% of its citizens.

      Your idea is understandable, but it’s more correct to say that 1% feeds with 75% of the resources ... According to the Constitution, resources are a public property. And do not forget that we have one of the highest taxes on extracted resources. And taxes are, in particular, the Army and Navy (the only friends of Russia).
  29. Ural resident
    Ural resident 12 December 2015 15: 06 New
    +5
    We remember everything, the terrorist attacks and Beslan, and how the "enlightened" London government affectionately called these non-people in Beslan "Insurgents" and the fact that we ourselves are to blame for this. Probably to blame for being too trusting and kind ..
  30. Fitter65
    Fitter65 12 December 2015 15: 09 New
    +2
    “... It happens, for example, in the 19th century after Russia lost in the Crimean War, she had to sell Russian Alaska to the USA. Russia then had to sell it: it was too weak and only began to concentrate to fight Turkey, and its patron-instigator "The British Empire. A little later, the United States would have taken away Russian Alaska anyway. And so the money went to re-equip the Army, Navy and strengthen the Pacific coast of the Russian Empire. Russia was concentrating! ..."
    This is where the money from the sale of Alaska went - it is still a mystery ... Not only was it "sold" for a penny, so for these pennies Russia had to take goods from America. Moreover, the goods did not reach Russia in full volume ...
  31. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 12 December 2015 15: 10 New
    -1
    We could be glad if we did not know that almost all of our resources have been sold out indirectly long ago (joint ventures and the like). That which remains ours is sold at a low price.
  32. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 12 December 2015 15: 11 New
    +2
    Now we go with the left tack, then right, then left, then right ... But in the end, we are moving forward. And it also throws us, but Russia is moving forward.
  33. Gardener91
    Gardener91 12 December 2015 15: 11 New
    +2
    I agree that the war is going on for Russian resources. In the early 90s, in the concept of the strategy of this war, the West used the tactics of using these resources in wide access (Russia as a raw material appendage) with the promise of providing advanced technologies in return. Greed ruined, instead of technologies, a river flowed from the master's table the benefits of Western "cultural civilization" are either cheaper. Now the tactics have changed radically, including the use of the damaging factor of weapons of mass destruction of the world mass media, and it has acquired a more threatening form. However, the strategy remained because all this is designed for a long-term period, and here is the concept, the final, predictable result of this war has become invisible due to the strengthening of Russia both in the internal political and external directions.
  34. Friends
    Friends 12 December 2015 15: 11 New
    +1
    Quote: Denis Obukhov
    The author is trying to convince us that because of our natural resources, someone wants to seize our territory.
    Moreover, the author does not name a specific enemy, but writes down the entire world around us into the enemy environment.


    Unfortunately, history shows that this statement is not far from the truth.

    Russia has no friends. They are afraid of our vastness. We have only two reliable friends: the Russian army and the Russian fleet!


    I am sure that Alexander III knew what he was talking about.
  35. Cams
    Cams 12 December 2015 15: 15 New
    0
    Selling Alaska? Hardly..
    The collapse of the United States? Quite, quite .....
  36. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 12 December 2015 15: 45 New
    +2
    Quote: onix757
    As you can see, the “Putin regime” is slowly, but confidently, pursuing a course towards the revival of Russia.

    Further reading makes no sense. The author hit into propaganda.


    We lived without propaganda and purpose in life for over 20 years. Tell what this led to? Not in economics (albeit in economics either), but in brains.
    1. onix757
      onix757 12 December 2015 15: 57 New
      0
      We lived without propaganda and purpose in life for over 20 years. Tell what this led to? Not in economics (albeit in economics either), but in brains.

      Propaganda must be based on something. First of all, ideology. Judging because now there is no official ideology, and the unofficial one preaches the principle "love yourself, spit on everything and success awaits you in life", then such propaganda is worthless. I would have perceived the propaganda from the government that cares for the interests of the people, not in words but in deeds (although such a government and propaganda is not needed), but here is the verbiage from 2% of the population broadcasting for brainwashing / preserving their capital I refuse to accept any nonsense.
  37. sa-ag
    sa-ag 12 December 2015 15: 57 New
    +1
    "... As you can see, the 'Putin regime' is slowly but confidently pursuing a course towards the revival of Russia."

    Author, you negotiate what kind of Russia he is reviving, which is the Russian Empire, which is the USSR, which is the RSFSR, which is the Russian Federation of the post of 1991 or post of 2000? Otherwise, it is not clear, like other statements about the "right path", "right course" and other statements.
    1. Gardener91
      Gardener91 12 December 2015 18: 46 New
      0
      You are right. There is no global concept of development, course in the Russian Federation now, so to speak. Or maybe the liberal Government has a hidden, secret one? The government course is being seen in the social sphere and economy and it does not make me happy at all!
  38. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 12 December 2015 16: 03 New
    +2
    Quote: avva2012
    Instead of sitting on a reservation or lying in the ground, carved out by the "noble and civilized" I agree with you. Only mixed marriages in Siberia can be counted, you will be tortured to spoil the ink. And, after all, this is an indicator. Joint children, with a subhuman, will not work, no matter how hard you try. Here, they say, "if you want to live happily, marry a Buryat woman."


    There is another proverb there repeat , about someone who has not been to Siberia ........ I really like her (not only have nothing against the Buryats, but a whole bunch of Buryat friends)
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 12 December 2015 18: 20 New
      +1
      I really like it (against the Buryats, I have not only nothing, but a whole bunch of Buryat friends) And, really, I like her ... Moreover, I checked it several times, and each time I liked it more and more. My fish, veil-tailed. Eh, youth .. You where settled down, if not a secret?
  39. tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 16: 05 New
    -4
    From Baikal. And you ask the Khakasses about the Gaidar. What will they answer you? Maybe you can rake in the portrait.
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 12 December 2015 16: 18 New
      +2
      From Baikal. And you ask the Khakasses about the Gaidar. What will they answer you? Maybe you can rake in the portrait. Don't be rude. Nationalism, in any form, is generally not welcome. And, so, comrade, "sixteen-year-old captain" (in the sense of skulls on shoulder straps) are going the right way.
  40. tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 16: 12 New
    0
    But in Tuva, many proverbs go about starving Russians.
  41. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 12 December 2015 16: 15 New
    0
    Quote: mikh-korsakov
    Hydrogen + catalyst + metal cylinder for storing hydrogen + explosiveness is much higher than gasoline - hence the special precautions for transportation. To make sure, compare the flame of a gas burner and a hydrogen one (the latter in the DIP detector provides thermal decomposition of almost any known organic substance).
    It is forbidden to place a hydrogen cylinder in any room; it is carried out onto the street
  42. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 12 December 2015 16: 16 New
    +3
    Quote: tumen
    From Baikal. And you ask the Khakasses about the Gaidar. What will they answer you? Maybe you can rake in the portrait.


    I have relatives in Khakassia. From them (they are Russians) I have not heard anything about "Gaidar". This is how the revolution was: the replacement of one system by another, the first in the world. How many firewood they have broken - it's scary to remember. Who is to blame for this, and who ordered it (if ordered) - historians still have to figure it out for decades (and we are unlikely to find out the truth). Naturally: there is no revolution without blood. And for different people (even not necessarily enemies) one and the same person can be a hero, and maybe an enemy (executioner).
    1. tumen
      tumen 12 December 2015 16: 33 New
      -2
      I am not interested in your Russian relatives in Khakassia. The question was about the Gaidar and the Khakass, so. You wrote: "the change of one system to another" But tell me, the Khakass are to blame for the change of this order.
  43. gg.na
    gg.na 12 December 2015 16: 21 New
    0
    Everything is written correctly in the article good ! I completely agree with everything yes !
  44. tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 16: 27 New
    -1
    I am not interested in your Russian relatives in Khakassia. The question was about the Gaidar and the Khakasses.
    1. S_Baykala
      S_Baykala 12 December 2015 16: 48 New
      +4
      Relatives live there. Therefore, he communicates with local residents, Khakass. Well, I say: I haven't heard anything about Gaidar from them. And if you (you have noticed: adequate members of the forum communicate with each other on "YOU" and are not rude to strangers) are not interested in the answer (albeit an indirect one) to your question, so why the hell are you asking a question at all?
      And enlighten the ignoramus and ignoramus: what happened to Gaidar there?
  45. tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 17: 03 New
    -1
    Read Soloukhin's "Salt Lake". There it is well described how the Gaidar destroyed the Khakass, who were to blame for the change of one system to another. And do not hesitate to tell the proverb about the Buryats. And I will tell you about the starving Russians in Tuva
  46. potalevl
    potalevl 12 December 2015 17: 16 New
    -2
    The author mixed the population, resources into a heap, the West should (to whom?), Arm yourself, otherwise I will take everything away. Let's not panic, take a sober look at the current situation. US foreign debt of about 19 trillion. dollars, of which about 3 trillion (15%) to countries of the world (China, Russia, etc.) and about 16 trillion (85%) to the US Federal Reserve, which is a private joint-stock company, and since 1913 has been printing private money under the name dollar, and since December 1945, under the Bretton Woods agreement, it made the whole world (except the USSR) recognize the unsecured paper as the only world currency. According to this agreement, the countries of the world that have adopted this agreement may have in their economy the amount of the national currency equal to the number of dollars available in the country's gold and currency reserves, multiplied by the exchange rate of these currencies. And such structures as the IMF, IBRD, WTO, created at the direction of the US Federal Reserve, strictly monitor that all the rules and instructions of a private office called the US Federal Reserve are implemented and the dollar dominates the world. Remember how under Boriska-drunk they asked for money from the IMF in order to print their money, so today, gas and oil prices in dollars are falling, so we lower the ruble exchange rate below the plinth to keep our money at least at the same level.
    1. Gardener91
      Gardener91 12 December 2015 19: 06 New
      0
      The United States wanted to spit on its state debt! They are monopolists in the production of greens, and they learned to manage and regulate processes in their own and not only economies during many crises and at the expense of others.
  47. potalevl
    potalevl 12 December 2015 17: 31 New
    -1
    Not for resources mattresses are now fighting with us, but for a change of power. You think why they did not begin to occupy us at Boriska? Yes, because their protégés were in power and were ready to give everything if only they would be kings in Moscow. GDP came and began to raise the country a little from its knees. But the old specialists remained, who studied in the USA and received cookies from them, and besides the financial and economic laws and the rules imposed on us by the Fed, they don’t know anything or do not want to know. Therefore, the GDP does not succeed in quickly raising the country's economy. They just began to raise the military-industrial complex, and to rearm the army. In order to raise the country's economy, it is necessary to get out of all the structures the US Federal Reserve has imposed on us, to abandon the dollar, which is what GDP is trying to do (we are quietly dumping bucks, just like China). And what is happening in the world today, so this suggests that the guys from the US Federal Reserve are not going to take their positions without a fight. Here it is somehow, briefly.
  48. tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 17: 39 New
    -4
    potalevl "VVP came" Yes, "came" And here's how you came remember the 1999-2000 winter. Eltsin is on TV with a deep hangover.
    1. potalevl
      potalevl 12 December 2015 18: 07 New
      +4
      How did you come? I cannot give an exact answer, I don’t own state secrets, I don’t enter the higher echelons of power, but the fact that as a result of a peaceful palace coup is unambiguous. What groups supported him? I don’t know, but judging by the fact that the GDP brought the country out of the state of “wild capitalism”, when the oligarchs robbed the country and sold it right and left, the grouping is correct. In addition, today VVP is the only political figure in the world who is trying to show our "sworn friends" that Moscow is the third Rome and there will be no fourth Rome. Therefore, it is definitely not a protege of the US Federal Reserve. Something like this.
  49. Fei_Wong
    Fei_Wong 12 December 2015 18: 10 New
    0
    The beginning and middle of the article are purely fit (because retelling real facts is nothing new, but recalling once again doesn’t hurt - pink glasses may fall off at least for someone else), but the ending is puzzling. Somewhere Ostap with kidneys and Alaska didn’t go there. Although I will not draw conclusions for now, it seems as if the author indicated the continuation. First we read the sequel.
  50. avva2012
    avva2012 12 December 2015 18: 13 New
    +2
    Quote: tumen
    Read Soloukhin's "Salt Lake". There it is well described how the Gaidar destroyed the Khakass, who were to blame for the change of one system to another. And do not hesitate to tell the proverb about the Buryats. And I will tell you about the starving Russians in Tuva

    The proverb about the Buryats is not told to just anyone. Who knows, he understood. Try, nevertheless, to be grammatically correct in Russian. And, then, while in these wilds, you figure it out, you already lose your thought. Unfortunately, not everyone has such encyclopedic knowledge and at least the makings of intelligence, as you do. About the "starving Russians in Tuva", try to remember this whole story, and, perhaps, if you want, please state it in a separate article on VO. With interest, I will try to replenish my, and so, not rich, knowledge base. I think other members of the forum will support my humble initiative. With the deepest respect, I look forward to your new comments, and of course, the story "about the starving ...". Thank you for spending so much time reading, not so distant and generally not informative, but, I hope, sincere message.