Military Review

Constitution Day of the Russian Federation. Is there any reason to criticize certain points of the Basic Law?

224
Constitution of Russia. 1 section. Chapter 1. Article 1.
Item 1:

The Russian Federation - Russia is a democratic federal state with a republican form of government.
Article 4.
Item 1:

The sovereignty of the Russian Federation extends over its entire territory.
Item 3:
The Russian Federation ensures the integrity and inviolability of its territory.

Constitution Day of the Russian Federation. Is there any reason to criticize certain points of the Basic Law?


It would seem that such simple and correct words. On the rights of citizens, on the protection of sovereignty, extending from Kaliningrad to Anadyr, from Derbent to Murmansk. However, it so happened that the Constitution of the Russian Federation itself, which today celebrates its next birthday, since the establishment of the new Russia, gives reason to reflect on, but does the basic law really protect all civil interests and all 100%? And the more actively attempts are made to contain Russia by our big and small “friends,” the more clearly the dubious background of some of the statements, which are fixed in the main law of the state, appears.

Of course, to engage in criticism of the Basic Law, especially on his birthday, moveton. As they say, the Constitution Day about the Constitution should be either good or nothing. But the Fundamental Law itself promises full protection of freedom of speech, and therefore it is quite possible to afford to reflect on the fact that the Constitution should hardly remain stone and not ready to accept amendments that meet the realities.

So, forgive the Basic Law, today we will talk about some constitutional clauses that, if not from the very beginning, then from relatively recent times look ambiguous, to put it mildly.

First, about the already mentioned freedom of speech, which the Constitution, frankly speaking, is commented not on freedom, but more on permissiveness.

Article 29.
Item 1.

Everyone is guaranteed freedom of thought and speech.

Item 2.
Propaganda or agitation inciting social, racial, national or religious hatred and enmity are not allowed. Propaganda of social, racial, national, religious or linguistic superiority is prohibited.


If we consider these points purely from a legal point of view, it turns out that, for example, agitation and propaganda antistate activities (well, for example, the recent case with calls for a revolution in Russia of one notorious former prisoner, before being released) is quite acceptable, as she, firstly, does not contradict paragraph 2, article.NUMX, and secondly may be completely guaranteed as a freedom of thought and speech, as the first paragraph of the same 29 constitutional article says.

We can say that the conclusion is sucked from the finger, because there is also the Criminal Code, but the Basic Law has Art. 15, which sounds like this:
The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force, direct effect and is applied throughout the territory of the Russian Federation. Laws and other legal acts adopted in the Russian Federation should not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

That is, with the particular desire of special individuals, any anti-state agitation, which includes appeals "to the ground, and then," is recognized by the Constitution as completely legitimate, and the Fundamental Law itself derogates from all other laws that try to say that

There p. 4 Art. 13, which sounds like this:
The creation and activity of public associations whose goals or actions are aimed at changing the foundations of the constitutional system and violating the integrity of the Russian Federation, undermining the security of the state, creating armed groups, inciting social, racial, national and religious hatred are prohibited.

Here, it would seem, and prohibits the notorious revolution, but it was not there. Any mediocre lawyer will say that one thing is public associations, and another thing, for example, pseudo-religious organizations or “individuals-individuals”.

The result is a paradox: the current Constitution, adopted in 1993, to put it mildly, not without the hint of the same “big friends” of Russia, does not itself contradict the unconstitutional coup, which is now called “friends of friends” ... Nonsense, but in fact So.

Another section of the Constitution to which there are certain issues. This is a section on the country's president.

So, according to the Basic Law, any citizen of the country who has been permanently residing in Russia for at least 10 years can become a president of Russia. This citizen’s age cannot be less than 35 years. It would seem, what is the paradox? And the fact that the Constitution of the Russian Federation says nothing, for example, about the criminal record of the candidate. That is, it turns out that if this or that citizen managed, roughly speaking, to wind up the deadline, for example, for embezzling state property on a particularly large scale, then the path to the presidency is in fact open to him. The Constitution does not preclude the election of such a citizen. Well, that at least is not encouraged ...

The Constitution of the Russian Federation does not say that a deputy of parliament can in certain cases be deprived of a deputy mandate. This leads to a phenomenon that probably is not found in any other country in the world. Russia is such a free state that, being a deputy, we can be suspected of committing a crime, run away from justice abroad, not appear (naturally) at parliamentary meetings, openly declare that certain representatives are voting for you, and (lo and behold!) Everything this time to remain a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation and at all corners throw mud at the country and the people that you are supposed to represent ...

At the same time, somewhere in the walls of the State Duma of the Russian Federation:
Parliamentarians are obliged to guard the rule of law, the peak of which is the Basic Law (Sergey Naryshkin).

So the parliamentarians are standing. Particularly on guard is the deputy Ilya Ponomarev ... Now in Zurich, now in New York, now in Vilnius ...

The basic law - a thing that, by definition, should create a strong state base - can not be taken and thrown into the furnace only because there are points of doubt in it. Indeed, on the basis of the Constitution, a modern state was built and a modern society was formed. On the basis of the Constitution, there is a system of public and state institutions. But the Constitution should not turn into a dead document, in a number of its areas further and further extending from the objective reality that Russia faces today. Finding a balance between preventive changes to the Basic Law and the inviolability of its most important contours is a task that looks very relevant on Constitution Day.
Photos used:
virtualnyeobrazy.ru
224 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 12 December 2015 06: 56 New
    +8
    The deputy Ilya Ponomarev is especially on guard ...


    Wasn't he deprived of his deputy's "crust"?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 07: 10 New
      +9
      Quote: aszzz888
      Wasn't he deprived of his deputy's "crust"?

      Deprived of course.
      Cons for what the person put?
      1. MIKHALYCH1
        MIKHALYCH1 12 December 2015 07: 13 New
        68
        This constitution is EBN! Written under the dictation of the State Department advisers ... It is high time to write a NEW CONSTITUTION for a new and strong Russia!
        1. rotmistr60
          rotmistr60 12 December 2015 07: 21 New
          37
          I will support you. Some simply do not want to remember how and under whose dictation this Constitution was written. That is why the "liberals" on all Russian channels are trying to prove that it was they who brought Russia out of the "deep hole."
          1. Boris55
            Boris55 12 December 2015 13: 04 New
            +9
            Quote: rotmistr60
            I will support you

            Join.
            According to Victor Scheinis, one of the authors of the Constitution of Russia, chief researcher at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the “presidential draft” of the Constitution was created under the auspices of three people, Sergey Sergeyevich Alekseeva, Anatoly Alexandrovich Sobchak and Sergei Mikhailovich Shahray, they were the leaders of the process, but in total more than 800 participants participated in the Constitutional Conference, various lawyers worked. Sergey Shakhrai distinguishes two main authors of the constitution - himself and Sergey Alekseev. (Alekseeva L.M. is a well-known lawyer, a US citizen, who defends US interests in Russia to this day) As a result of joint work, a new unified draft of the Constitution of Russia was developed, which was subsequently put forward by the President of Russia for a popular vote (in fact - for a referendum), and became the current Constitution of the Russian Federation as a result of the vote held on December 12, 1993.

            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Sergej1972
              Sergej1972 12 December 2015 22: 59 New
              +1
              Alekseeva L.M. no relation to S.S. Alekseev (by the way, the first and last chairman of the committee of constitutional supervision of the SSR) does not. They are just namesakes.
            3. gladcu2
              gladcu2 14 December 2015 20: 11 New
              0
              Boris55

              Shahrai from Ukrainian is a scammer.
          2. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 12 December 2015 14: 15 New
            16
            Quote: Author
            It is forbidden to create and operate public associations whose goals or actions are aimed at violent change the foundations of the constitutional order

            Filth, Koleegi
            And who can tell what kind of system we have, which is determined by the constitution?
            Where in the constitution the definition of the constitutional system is specified, which the constitution itself protects? request

            And yet, it seems to me that the constitution has a number of other articles that should be discussed and which are directly violated.
            For example: Article 3
            1. The bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people.
            2. The people exercise their power directly, as well as through government bodies and local governments.
            3. The highest direct expression of the power of the people is a referendum and free elections.
            4. No one can appropriate power in the Russian Federation. The seizure of power or the appropriation of power is prosecuted under federal law.
            Article 9
            1. Land and other natural resources are used and protected in the Russian Federation as the basis of the life and activities of the peoples living in the relevant territory.
            2. Land and other natural resources may be in private, state, municipal and other forms of ownership.Article 19
            1. All are equal before the law and the court.

            Article 28
            Everyone is guaranteed freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, including the right to individually or jointly with others profess any religion or not to profess any, freely choose, have and disseminate religious and other beliefs and act in accordance with them.
            Article 29
            1. Everyone is guaranteed freedom of thought and speech.
            5. Guaranteed freedom of the media. Censorship is prohibited.
            Article 31
            Citizens of the Russian Federation have the right to assemble peacefully without weapons, hold meetings, rallies and demonstrations, marches and pickets.
            Article 40
            1. Everyone has the right to housing. No one may be arbitrarily deprived of a home.
            3. Poor, other citizens specified in the law who need housing, it is provided free of charge or for an affordable fee from state, municipal and other housing funds in accordance with statutory requirements.
            Article 41
            1. Everyone has the right to health and medical care. Medical assistance in state and municipal healthcare institutions is provided to citizens is free at the expense of the relevant budget, insurance premiums, other income.
            Article 53
            Everyone has the right to compensation by the state for damage caused by unlawful actions (or inaction) of state authorities or their officials.
            The opinion of members of the forum is interesting, are these articles being implemented?
            but of course I like more, this one
            1. Temples
              Temples 12 December 2015 14: 50 New
              0
              Filth, Koleegi
              And who can tell what kind of system we have, which is determined by the constitution?


              The answer is in the first chapter, in the first article:

              Chapter 1. Fundamentals of the constitutional system
              Article 1.
              1. The Russian Federation - Russia is a democratic federal state with a republican form of government.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. guzik007
                guzik007 12 December 2015 15: 12 New
                +3
                And what is a democratic system?
                -------------------------------------
                It is true that democracy is a form of government, and it was born under the slave system in Greek cities a thousand years before the birth of Christ
                1. ancient
                  ancient 12 December 2015 15: 45 New
                  +8
                  Quote: guzik007
                  And what is a democratic system?


                  You are sent to ....., to ......, to ...... and you are free to choose your own "path" wink
            3. ancient
              ancient 12 December 2015 15: 43 New
              +6
              Quote: Stroporez
              And who can tell what kind of system we have, which is determined by the constitution?


              In my opinion .. the purest NEOFEODALISM! soldier

              Quote: Stroporez
              : Article 3
              1. The bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people.


              The source of power is the Kremlin and Okhotny Ryad .. all the rest (well, like the people) .. goes ... in general where .. they will send.

              Paragraph 2.- Power is exercised by the PARTY OF POWER (as he is positioning himself), but the fact that he seems to be like .. "servants of the people" .. forget about it and .. rub.

              Clause 3.- The last referendums were in 1991 and 93 .. all this "democracy" ended.

              Well, then .... it’s not at all interesting ..... The author of the article is absolutely right .. here as a deceased .. either well .. or .. in general soldier
            4. your1970
              your1970 12 December 2015 20: 36 New
              +1
              Have you read her-Stalin? On some issues you will be surprised ...
            5. gladcu2
              gladcu2 14 December 2015 20: 18 New
              0
              Sling cutter

              Inconvenient questions, please ask.

              It seems there, to amend the constitution, it is necessary to create a referendum. On the one hand, it’s true on the other, it’s not clear how one can create that unique and non-repeatable people who are not specialists.

              Still, without fussing, what is the procedure?
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 07: 32 New
          +8
          Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
          This constitution is EBN! Written under the dictation of the State Department advisers ... It is high time to write a NEW CONSTITUTION for a new and strong Russia!

          From the cycle -Do not read, but condemn.
          90% on the site did not read the constitution at all, even a certain percentage, they constantly quote some articles on the basis of which the whole constitution flies into the furnace.
          And which articles or sections, chapters do you need to change?
          1. rotmistr60
            rotmistr60 12 December 2015 07: 45 New
            15
            And which articles or sections, chapters do you need to change?

            Can you give your opinion first? Have you read the Constitution yourself? Or so, as usual, all in the "mud"?
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 25 New
                -2
                Quote: rotmistr60
                A.romanov, what is the only minus?

                And by what I know, I didn’t put this minus, it’s interesting to me. But who put the minus, looked, I know, but I won’t telllol
                Quote: rotmistr60
                Or is there no support from friends from Israel yet?

                Do not envy, do not smile
            2. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 24 New
              +5
              Quote: rotmistr60
              Have you read the Constitution?

              Of course not, like most.
              Quote: rotmistr60
              Or so, as usual, all in the "mud"?

              Not just in fact, they read and know the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, only lawyers, lawyers, and partially those who are currently sitting in prison scooping up a shellfish.
              So it is with the constitution, it is not big, but it is written so that a normal person will not read it.
              Firstly, everyone is busy with their daily lives, and secondly, most are content with quotes hi
              1. rotmistr60
                rotmistr60 12 December 2015 08: 34 New
                +5
                that a normal person will not read it.

                Well, since so, so what are the claims to visitors ?.
                looked, I know, but I won’t tell

                And I personally do not need it. I already see my ill-wishers from the comments (with the exception of the silent).
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 43 New
                  -2
                  Quote: rotmistr60
                  Well, since so, so what are the claims to visitors ?.

                  Listen. And let the visitors speak for themselves, they did not require lawyers.
                  Quote: rotmistr60
                  And I personally do not need it. I see my ill-wishers by comments (with the exception of the silent)

                  Do you post your logs? I don’t minus you at all, and on this topic of my minuses a couple, mostly pluses.
                  By the way, thank you for saying that I’m your enemy. And she wasn’t in the know.
                  And finally, since you know the constitution so well, what exactly doesn’t suit you in which sections?
                  1. rotmistr60
                    rotmistr60 12 December 2015 08: 54 New
                    +7
                    I didn’t declare you an enemy, I wonder what made you think so? By the way, I minus you too extremely rarely (for the flag you set in particular, but with your comment). I hope the consequences for me do not need to be clarified? Sorry that I can not lay out everything that comes from you, but many have already paid attention to this. And, I personally wrote to you in PM that it is time to stop using your official position to protect friends.
                    1. rotmistr60
                      rotmistr60 12 December 2015 08: 58 New
                      +4
                      Listen. And let the visitors speak for themselves, they did not require lawyers.

                      I completely agree with this. Just explain to me, not reasonable, what are you trying to build almost all visitors for yourself? Therefore, listencome on yours ego shove it at least temporarily in one place. He will probably be more comfortable there.
                    2. Alexander Romanov
                      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 15 New
                      +3
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      I didn’t declare you an enemy, I wonder what made you think so?

                      Is this not in my garden?
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      I see my detractors from comments

                      If not, then good.
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      I hope the consequences for me do not need to be clarified?

                      what And what are they?
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      Sorry that I can’t lay out everything that comes from you, but many have already paid attention to this.

                      Glory to Israel lol
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      And, I personally wrote to you in PM that it is time to stop using your official position to protect friends.

                      It is necessary to ban all Jews, still all who you do not like, only then with whom will you have a debate, yourself?
                      1. rotmistr60
                        rotmistr60 12 December 2015 09: 22 New
                        +5
                        Well, it’s not for you to tell the moderator how many minuses I put to you and for what comments. Here you did not think before you say it.
                        then with whom will you debate, yourself?

                        What you foolishly wanted to do. So, for your information, in addition to the Jews so beloved by you, there are enough visitors on the site.
                      2. Alexander Romanov
                        Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 28 New
                        +1
                        Quote: rotmistr60
                        Well, not for you to tell the moderator how many minuses I put to you and for what comments

                        Yes, I pay little attention. I will keep track of
                        Quote: rotmistr60
                        What you foolishly wanted to do

                        Well, if you wanted, you would have done, without a doubt hi
                      3. ava09
                        ava09 12 December 2015 13: 05 New
                        +7
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Quote: rotmistr60
                        What you foolishly wanted to do

                        Well, if you wanted, you would have done, without a doubt


                        Even out of stupidity? In my opinion, such "titans of thought" should be insured "against the fool." But seriously, guys wake up! You find out personal squabbles publicly, accuse each other according to the principle: "D-k himself." But the material touches upon the topic of REAL SURVIVAL OF RUSSIANS, Russian Jews as well. For those whose consciousness has already been formatted and defragmented by "democrats", I will clarify - we have changed "Russian" to "Russian", if someone does not understand for what purpose, write - I will try to explain. It's just a big topic. Valka - "red cowards" has already publicly stated that the modern Russian constitution is a masterpiece and should not be changed under any circumstances.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. alexej123
                alexej123 13 December 2015 00: 55 New
                0
                Sorry, accidentally zamusnovat, did not want to.
          2. Kibalchish
            Kibalchish 12 December 2015 11: 28 New
            +1
            Well, we, historians, read


            By the way, here is another interesting section


            Article 66

            1. The status of the republic is determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the constitution of the republic.
          3. CTEPX
            CTEPX 12 December 2015 11: 42 New
            -2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Firstly, everyone is busy with their daily lives, and secondly

            And for military-patriotic education in Russia, our Constitution becomes a concrete brake. Because in this direction it is being fulfilled)).
      2. Suvorov
        Suvorov 12 December 2015 08: 24 New
        21
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And which articles or sections, chapters do you need to change?


        First of all, it is necessary to change the section of the constitution that establishes the inequality of the subjects of the federation, in which republics within the Russian Federation have more rights than territories and regions. In fact, these are states in a state that have a certain sovereignty (although limited). It will be better if all the subjects of the Russian Federation are named the same (for example, in the province, as it was in tsarist Russia). Moreover, the rights of indigenous peoples of Russia must be guaranteed.
        In my opinion, the provisions on the priority of international law over Russian and the provisions on citizenship (including issues of acquisition and deprivation of citizenship), as well as a ban on state ideology, need to be reviewed. It is best to adopt a new constitution, more in line with current and future challenges.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 52 New
          +2
          Quote: Suvorov
          First of all, it is necessary to change the section of the constitution establishing the inequality of the subjects of the federation, in which republics within the Russian Federation have more rights than territories and regions

          Let's give more right-way to separatism.
          Reduce the right to usurp power.
          Quote: Suvorov
          It would be better if all the subjects of the Russian Federation are named the same (for example, in the province, as it was in tsarist Russia)

          Russian Empire, two hands FOR!
          Quote: Suvorov
          Moreover, the rights of indigenous peoples of Russia must be guaranteed.

          Russian rights?
          Quote: Suvorov
          In my opinion, the provisions on the priority of international law over Russian and the provisions on citizenship need to be revised

          we put a few days ago on international law, without changing the constitution. There would be a desire hi
          Quote: Suvorov
          as well as a ban on state ideology.

          Is it forbidden?
          1. Chiropractor
            Chiropractor 12 December 2015 10: 05 New
            +5
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Is it forbidden?


            Yes sir!
            "no ideology can be recognized as a state one" - I can not vouch for the accuracy of every word, but the meaning is.
          2. CTEPX
            CTEPX 12 December 2015 11: 48 New
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov [i
            ] At the same time, the rights of the indigenous peoples of Russia must be guaranteed. [/ I]
            Russian rights?

            Why not?))
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            we put a few days ago on international law, without changing the constitution.There would be a desire

            This is not true. There will be no changes in the Constitution.
            Quote: Alexander Romanov

            [i] as well as a ban on state ideology. [/ i]
            Is it forbidden?

            It is not allowed)).
            1. onix757
              onix757 12 December 2015 13: 34 New
              +6
              Quote: ctepx
              Quote: Alexander Romanov [i
              ] At the same time, the rights of the indigenous peoples of Russia must be guaranteed. [/ I]
              Russian rights?
              Why not?))

              And because ethnic republics require a lot of resources, but at the same time they eradicate all Russianness on their territory. But this is wrong, there must be a respectful approach on a reciprocal basis, and economic returns also play a role, of course. In the Republic of Tatarstan, for example, the republic is still headed by the president, although we have one president under the constitution.
              1. Sergej1972
                Sergej1972 12 December 2015 22: 55 New
                0
                I was, for example, in Mordovia, I did not notice any "Mordovianness" there. If you do not know where you are, a typical average small region.
            2. alexej123
              alexej123 13 December 2015 01: 01 New
              0
              According to the priority of the norms of international law - that's right - have not yet been put. Until there is a change in the Constitution. Its norms have a priori priority over other laws and regulations.
        2. Senior manager
          Senior manager 12 December 2015 09: 51 New
          +3
          I think it is necessary to make changes to the Basic Law as the society grows older and to global changes in the world. Indeed, claims to the Constitution have already accumulated. So society is growing up.
          1. ava09
            ava09 12 December 2015 13: 21 New
            +1
            Quote: St. Propulsion
            I think it is necessary to make changes to the Basic Law as the society grows older and to global changes in the world. Indeed, claims to the Constitution have already accumulated. So society is growing up.


            Let me disagree. The Constitution, as a phenomenon, if it is needed, then first of all to protect the most conservative that society has - public MORALITY and, if you like, ideology, which follows from the same morality of Russians. And if we all "grow up" with the coming to power of another team of villains, as it was in the early 90s, the Russians, like the Union of Nations, will simply disappear.
        3. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 12 December 2015 18: 35 New
          +2
          Quote: Suvorov
          It is best to adopt a new constitution, more in line with current and future challenges.

          The Constitution is the Law. If the laws were perfect, they would not change for millennia.
          The Stalinist Constitution was good for its time.
          The current Constitution for that time was also not bad, but time is running out, life is changing and the criteria for life are the same.
          From the posts I see that some want to return the Stalinist Constitution, some correct the current one.
          In my opinion, you do not need to either return the old one or edit the current one. You just need to develop a new Constitution, which would correspond to modern realities and adopt it on the basis of a nationwide referendum.
        4. your1970
          your1970 12 December 2015 22: 04 New
          +1
          do you have any suggestions on ideology? really? such as to suit at least a percent of the xnumx population (not to mention the xnumx)?
          What if not a secret?
          Just to clarify, everyone who is younger than 30 about the communist can no longer talk about it: for them it no longer exists, they did not find it ..
          Conciliarity? Orthodoxy? In a country where Russians are not the most numerous people and half the Muslim population? ...
          The idea of ​​serving the Motherland? I am tormented by vague doubts that they will send you far on foot on an erotic journey - the youth in the army do not want to serve, they have been mowing all the imaginable ways for the last 20 years. And even for something bigger, today's youth can be pushed and torn ..
          Are we against the whole world? True, but ... you will again be sent for a walk, today's young people do not believe in the idea of ​​destroying Russia ..
          And with the elderly, we don’t need ideology ..
          Proofs? Just sing the hymn and I am 100% sure that if you are over 40 years old, you will sing "Unbreakable Union ..."
          By myself, I know how it takes to have to look for words and again to learn, well, they don’t penetrate deep into them, they slip ...
          1. giperion121
            giperion121 13 December 2015 18: 29 New
            +1
            Half Muslims? Are you really overstating it? Russians are not the most numerous people? 86% since when is it not the most numerous?
            In ideology, there should be a competent combination of socialism with a mixed economy (as in China) and Russian nationalism with a constructivist approach (i.e., all complementary peoples like Ukrainians, Belarusians, Tatars, Bulgars, etc. should be Russified)
        5. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 12 December 2015 22: 54 New
          0
          Actually, in reality, the republics have no more rights than the territories and regions. They have the right to have other official languages, in addition to the compulsory state Russian language. But it is quite natural. In the territories and areas of the charters, in the republics of the constitution. But, frankly, the texts of the charters and constitutions of the subjects of the federation are 90% identical. The structure of the authorities in the regions and regions, and in the republics is not much different. The prosecutor's office, internal affairs bodies, investigative bodies, and the judiciary (in addition to magistrates' courts and statutory courts) they are only in some entities) are centralized and are administered by the federation.
          Only Chechnya (you yourself understand why), Tatarstan, Bashkiria and Yakutia (the first two are one of the largest in terms of economy and population, the third largest area of ​​the Russian Federation, because of their remoteness autonomy is only 6% more self-sufficient) ) Moreover, de jure, Bashkiria and Yakutia have no additional powers. But Chechnya and Ttaaria are the only regions that have an agreement on the delimitation of powers with the federal center.
          The remaining republics have the same rights as the territories and regions. And, say, the mayor of Moscow is a more influential figure compared to any head of the republic within the Russian Federation.
      3. Rastas
        Rastas 12 December 2015 10: 04 New
        16
        I read it even before December 93, before the vote. I remember very well that up to October 93, about 5-7 draft Constitutions were discussed, but Yeltsin extended his own draft, which practically established autocracy in the country. In addition, it was adopted bypassing the Law on Referendum, according to which the Constitution is considered adopted if more than 50% of those who have the right to vote voted for it. But Yeltsin issued a decree that the Constitution is considered adopted if 50% of those who came to the polls voted for it. Thus, at that time 30% voted for the Constitution in accordance with the then law "On Referendum". It was not passed legally. In addition, there is information about serious fraud. It is no coincidence that the ballots were destroyed a month after the vote.
      4. Rastas
        Rastas 12 December 2015 10: 10 New
        +6
        Supplementing the constitution is necessary by treatises on the responsibility of the authorities. And then in the constitution there are declarative articles like all sorts of freedoms, but there are no articles providing these very freedoms, which will happen if they are violated. In addition, articles on property are necessary, for example, in Germany, where it is said that property not only provides for a person, but also obliges him. it is necessary to establish clear control over the activities of all branches of government, on the responsibility of deputies and parliament. And it turns out that it is impossible to remove the president from office, it turns out lucky, no luck in the country with the president. This should not be.
        1. Egoza
          Egoza 12 December 2015 10: 45 New
          +3
          Quote: Rastas
          Supplementing the constitution is necessary by treatises on the responsibility of the authorities.

          Better yet, return the Stalinist Constitution, which was recognized as the most democratic constitution in the world. hi
          1. CTEPX
            CTEPX 12 December 2015 11: 54 New
            +1
            Quote: Egoza
            Stalin's Constitution

            And in it there was no primacy of officials and was the GOAL.
        2. gladcu2
          gladcu2 14 December 2015 21: 13 New
          0
          Rastas

          At the expense of the responsibility of the authorities and the duties of citizens, it directly warms the soul.

          Tell me, is open Internet discussion possible? Does it make sense?

          From your point of view?
      5. MIKHALYCH1
        MIKHALYCH1 12 December 2015 10: 10 New
        +6
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
        This constitution is EBN! Written under the dictation of the State Department advisers ... It is high time to write a NEW CONSTITUTION for a new and strong Russia!

        From the cycle -Do not read, but condemn.
        90% on the site did not read the constitution at all, even a certain percentage, they constantly quote some articles on the basis of which the whole constitution flies into the furnace.
        And which articles or sections, chapters do you need to change?

        I read briefly, you're right (begins to feel sick) ..
        The essence of this constitution is, in general terms, OBEYING WESTERN LAW! And they, as everyone now finally understood, double standards! This constitution is rewritten from Western templates ... I am not a lawyer, but I would have voiced the first article (and in fact it is)
        Article 1 Russia is always RIGHT!
        Article 2 If not right, read article 1!
        We have the right to behave this way, because we break many ridges! I’m simple, but I think many understood me ... hi
        1. Snail N9
          Snail N9 12 December 2015 11: 46 New
          +4
          Excuse me for "getting into" the "morning squabble" of "respectable" monogram bearers ", but I want to say that the modern" Constitution of the Russian Federation "is forced to study in the 11th grade of a comprehensive school in the" Law "module. Also, questions about the Constitution of the Russian Federation are found in the Unified State Exam in Social Studies. This I mean that the respected "monograms", perhaps due to their venerable age or for other "reasons", look somewhat divorced from the realities of the modern educational process.
          1. gladcu2
            gladcu2 14 December 2015 21: 21 New
            0
            Snail 9

            Purely interested. Does it make sense to study at school !?
            I ask for two reasons.
            First one. Will the student be able to realize the meaning of the constitution through his insignificant life experience.
            Second. In my life I had to "study" the works of Lenin. Since then, I don't want to get close. Everything is like quotes, if someone pulls out. It was hard to comprehend. In my opinion, it is difficult for schoolchildren to approach such things. Fights off enthusiasm.
            Although, who knows.
        2. CTEPX
          CTEPX 12 December 2015 11: 59 New
          +1
          Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
          This constitution is rewritten from Western patterns.

          But no! There is NOT a SINGLE basic law (constitution) of Western countries, close to the "rights and freedoms of the individual" as we do)).
        3. gladcu2
          gladcu2 14 December 2015 21: 15 New
          0
          MIKHALYCH

          Do not bend. The Russian Federation should not take responsibility for others.
      6. free
        free 12 December 2015 11: 03 New
        +1
        Well, let's say an article about the ban on campaigning, I think that reasonable campaigning is needed, do not agree?
      7. CTEPX
        CTEPX 12 December 2015 11: 32 New
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And which articles or sections, chapters do you need to change?

        Of course, everything that asserts the primacy of "personality" over the public and the state)).
        Of course, the prohibition of state ideology.
        And, of course, the primacy of "international" laws over Russian ones)).
      8. RDN414
        RDN414 12 December 2015 13: 19 New
        +8
        It is vitally important for us to make the following amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation:
        • Repeal article 75, part 2 - the abolition of the independence of the Central Bank from the state authorities of the Russian Federation
        (will lead to lower interest rates on loans, will give the country a ruble that is not pegged to the dollar)
        • Repeal Article 15, Part 4 - the abolition of the priority of international law over Russian
        (prohibition of foreign foreign governance / influence on domestic processes in the Russian Federation)
        • Repeal article 13, part 2 - cancellation of the ban on ideology
        (without their own ideology, the country does not have a common goal, there is no common idea, or they are replaced by foreign and foreign to us)
        • Amend Article 9, Part 2 - abolition of the PRIVATE form of ownership of natural resources of the Russian Federation
        • Cancel Art. 29 part 5 - the lifting of the ban on censorship will make it possible to effectively fight in the media with provocateurs and traitors seeking the collapse of the Russian Federation.
        • According to Article 6, paragraph XNUMX of the Constitution, we do not have the right to deprive the citizenship of the Russian Federation for betraying the homeland even outright traitors of our state.
        • The prevalence of international law in the form of generally recognized norms over Russian law is enshrined in the articles:
        15 p. 4; 17 p. 1; 55 p. 1; 63 p. 1 and 69.
        1. Idiot
          Idiot 15 January 2016 14: 24 New
          0
          As far as I know, under part 4 of article 15, the decision has already been made, but for the rest I completely agree. Moreover, we are again an evil empire and we have nothing to lose. Today we are almost sovereign, with the exception of the dependence of the ruble on the dollar, although this is the most important thing. The Central Bank should become a Federal State Institution and carry out ruble emission in the quantity necessary for national interests. And it is necessary to eliminate a number of state corporations as economically inefficient.
        2. Idiot
          Idiot 15 January 2016 14: 24 New
          0
          As far as I know, under part 4 of article 15, the decision has already been made, but for the rest I completely agree. Moreover, we are again an evil empire and we have nothing to lose. Today we are almost sovereign, with the exception of the dependence of the ruble on the dollar, although this is the most important thing. The Central Bank should become a Federal State Institution and carry out ruble emission in the quantity necessary for national interests. And it is necessary to eliminate a number of state corporations as economically inefficient.
      9. RDN414
        RDN414 12 December 2015 13: 38 New
        13
        Here are a couple more examples:

        - Any republic of RUSSIA is considered a state (may withdraw from Russia at any time) - Art. 5, p. 2
        - Land and other natural resources (oil, gas, etc.) belong to anyone (NOT to the people) - Art. 9, 36
        - The ban of Russia to have a development plan and its own ideology (it is determined abroad) - Art. 13, p. 2
        - The Central Bank of RUSSIA - is NOT state and is not governed by Russia (!!!) - Art. 75. p.2

        Thanks to article 75, clause 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law "ON THE CENTRAL BANK", Russia loses annually, according to experts, according to the most conservative estimates, about 300 billion dollars (!!!). An independent (non-state) central bank is working against RUSSIA, which also affects salaries and pensions, which are artificially reduced (by the policy of the Central Bank) by 30-60 thousand rubles a month, including yours. (!!!)
        PR: The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is prohibited from lending to Russia (to give money to the state) !!! - Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, Art. 22

        We (Russians) through the constitution recognize ourselves as a (subordinate) part of the international community, and commit ourselves to comply with foreign (international) laws, even if they contradict Russian laws and the interests of Russia - Art. 15, p. 4. The national interests of the country (Russia) and its people are ignored, this is duplicated in other laws and by-laws along the chain.

        Maybe it’s time for us to change the OCCUPATION CONSTITUTION and the BURNING LAW on the Central Bank?
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 12 December 2015 22: 57 New
          -1
          Nowhere in the Constitution of the Russian Federation is there even a hint of the right to secession of republics from the Russian Federation.
    2. venaya
      venaya 12 December 2015 07: 46 New
      +7
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      This constitution is EBN! Written under the dictation of the State Department advisers ..

      I will add: it was not adopted by voters under the law in force at that time, in which it was necessary to collect at least 50% of the votes of the deduction who did not vote but of the number of those at that time entitled to vote, and these are two big differences. So by law for the constitution the required 50% did not vote "for" from the number of registered voters and its adoption is not a legal act.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. shtanko.49
      shtanko.49 12 December 2015 17: 20 New
      +3
      Our constitution lives its own life and its people.
    5. Karabin
      Karabin 12 December 2015 20: 10 New
      +2
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      This constitution is EBN! Written under the dictation of the State Department advisers ...

      rotmistr60 (3)
      I will support you.

      Boris55 (5)
      Join.

      Here's how to understand you, gentlemen. According to this constitution, you choose your own rulers and judging by the approval, 86% (if you don’t lie) in the president do not expect any souls. The president is also happy with the constitution if he agrees for the third time to be its guarantor. And he is not going to change anything in it, with the exception of items on the administrative-territorial structure. Apparently he doesn’t want, although he can without problems, judging by the Crimean issue. So why are you so excited? Look at the president; he is calm and does not consider the constitution to be colonial.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. python2a
      python2a 13 December 2015 16: 35 New
      0
      That's right!
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 12 December 2015 07: 41 New
    0
    Cons for what the person put?


    to whom is this question?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 07: 46 New
      0
      Quote: aszzz888
      to whom is this question?

      Those who poked you cons.
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 12 December 2015 09: 53 New
        +1
        Alexander Romanov (5) RU Today, 07: 46 ↑ New
        Quote: aszzz888
        to whom is this question?
        Those who poked you cons.

        hi
  3. alexng
    alexng 12 December 2015 10: 24 New
    +2
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Cons for what the person put?


    For this, it is necessary that they put verified estimates and at the same time the cheap stuff will be eliminated, to highlight when the cursor is hovering over + or - the list of those who put the assessment, as is done on many resources. On those resources where this is implemented, they trashed every minuscule and then got there by accident. Like "topwar.ru" is a serious site, or that there are also cunning liberals "moles" in the administration of the site?
  4. vovanpain
    vovanpain 12 December 2015 16: 23 New
    +8
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Cons for what the person put?

    Probably put by those who voted for Ponomarev. hi
  5. alexej123
    alexej123 13 December 2015 00: 51 New
    0
    Here, too, it surprises me - well, I disagree with something - argue. I on articles where technical layouts, questions I ask, so also minus. Is everyone so smart?
  • Volodin
    12 December 2015 07: 16 New
    +4
    Ponomarev is deprived of parliamentary immunity, but the mandate is still with him
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 07: 22 New
      +3
      Quote: Volodin
      but the mandate is still with him

      A police officer is fired, and he leaves his identity card ... he says he has lost (it won’t be worse) and so what? He is no longer a cop! What is it worth Ponamareva ksiva in Russia, a crust that does not cost anything, like himself!
      1. Volodin
        12 December 2015 07: 28 New
        10
        Alexander, the fact of the matter is that Ksiva Ponomareva still has a number in the register of deputy "crusts" of the State Duma, and Ponomarev is still officially a member of the Russian parliament. The deputies deprived him of immunity, but to deprive him of his deputy status without adopting acc. our deputies have no right to their "colleagues" by law. The fact that Ponomarev himself is not a shisha is not worth it for Russia, of course, is not discussed. But this is the whole paradox of the situation - a deputy can shit from behind a hillock as much as he wants, but he is still a deputy with us.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 07: 39 New
          0
          Quote: Volodin
          Alexander, the fact of the matter is that Ksiva Ponomareva still has a number in the register of deputy "crusts" of the State Duma,

          Alexei, as practice shows, the state machine works in such a way that, regardless of the registers and documents, if the state wishes, any person (deputy, judge, prosecutor, governor) can end up in Lefortova.
          Quote: Volodin
          Ponomarev is still officially a deputy of the Russian parliament

          This is understandable, the law on the deprivation of fugitives, if I am not mistaken, has been considered for a year and a half already. Putin will say that they will be accepted in two days.
          Quote: Volodin
          But this is the whole paradox of the situation.

          There are many paradoxes in our country, we have Communists on the site, but none of them voted (according to their words) for Zyuganov. I’m sitting and I can’t understand who is voting for the Communist Party then?
          1. rotmistr60
            rotmistr60 12 December 2015 08: 15 New
            0
            as practice shows, the state machine works in such a way that in spite of registries and documents, if any state wishes
            a person (deputy, judge, prosecutor, governor) may end up in Lefortova.

            You feel your "great knowledge" of our law enforcement system. Especially touched by the "registers". Clarify please.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 27 New
              0
              Quote: rotmistr60

              You feel your "great knowledge" of our law enforcement system.

              Yes, I know, and not bad.
              Quote: rotmistr60
              ... Especially touched by the "registers". Clarify please.

              Is this a question for me or Volodin?
              1. rotmistr60
                rotmistr60 12 December 2015 08: 38 New
                0
                To what extent. I hope not on TV shows?
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 55 New
                  -1
                  Quote: rotmistr60
                  To what extent

                  In sufficient.
                  Quote: rotmistr60
                  I hope not on TV shows?

                  Your hopes are not empty words hi
                  1. rotmistr60
                    rotmistr60 12 December 2015 09: 17 New
                    +6
                    And, you know, I did not have any hopes for you. I can say one thing, judging by your comments that you are not older than 30, you did not serve in the army (in the extreme case, a military department), with an overestimated self-esteem, they are prone to tricks, well, you can continue further, but no longer want to. Here is my personal opinion. If not right, refute.
                    1. Alexander Romanov
                      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 31 New
                      0
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      you are not older than 30,

                      Wrong
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      did not serve in the army

                      Here you are right, I did not serve in the army, I served in the Navy tongue
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      with high self-esteem,

                      A sober view of life.
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      prone to tricks

                      Often I lend a helping hand to many.
                    2. Banshee
                      Banshee 12 December 2015 09: 56 New
                      +1
                      3: 0 in favor of Romanov. About podlyanok not in the know.
                  2. Chiropractor
                    Chiropractor 12 December 2015 10: 08 New
                    -2
                    even the captain is not in the spirit of today ... yesterday's booze makes itself felt?
                  3. rotmistr60
                    rotmistr60 12 December 2015 11: 38 New
                    0
                    By. I drink rarely and only on big holidays. And the New Year has not yet arrived. But your deflection, I think, will be credited.
                  4. guzik007
                    guzik007 12 December 2015 15: 18 New
                    -1
                    rotmistr60

                    I read your hassle with an invisible opponent and suddenly bang! I understand that Romanov blacklisted me! I am flattered! seems to have got it!
    2. alicante11
      alicante11 12 December 2015 08: 55 New
      0
      I’m sitting and I can’t understand, who then votes for the Communist Party?


      In 90, grandmothers-old women, and now I don’t know, probably write what remains after EP.
  • Bayonet
    Bayonet 12 December 2015 08: 20 New
    0
    Quote: Volodin
    Deputies deprived him of immunity,

    As early as April of this year, deputies of the State Duma deprived Ilya Ponomarev of parliamentary immunity and supported the idea of ​​the Prosecutor General's Office to institute criminal proceedings against him. The decision was made by 438 votes to one abstention.
    1. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 12 December 2015 09: 19 New
      +2
      Yoshkin cat!
      Well, for the Constitution!
      drinks
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 12 December 2015 09: 25 New
        -2
        When will the time come in Russia when we will not, on almost every president, change the Constitution? Well, we will change it now, and twenty years later, future descendants will again find articles in it that are inconsistent with that time. Where can we find those literate people who could write new articles of this Constitution so that we do not need to return to this issue after some time.
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag 12 December 2015 09: 30 New
          +3
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Well, we will change it now, and twenty years later, future descendants will again find articles in it that are inconsistent with that time.

          Everything flows, everything changes, realities change, the social system, state system, currency, legislation can change, the constitution must meet the current moment
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 12 December 2015 09: 43 New
            0
            Quote: sa-ag
            Everything flows, everything changes, realities change, the social system, state system, currency, legislation can change, the constitution must meet the current moment

            All of the provisions you listed, if you look, are a violation of the Constitution, which was in force at that time, is not it? So where is the way out?
            1. sa-ag
              sa-ag 12 December 2015 09: 53 New
              0
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              All of the provisions you listed, if you look, are a violation of the Constitution, which was in force at that time, is not it?

              Well, this is how you look, you can call it the development of society, an example is the Eurasian Union (this is my version), a single currency is introduced, therefore the Constitution needs to be adjusted, if it is a single state entity, then again, the correction, the Constitution is not something cut down in stone for centuries, some basic things remain unchanged, some change
        2. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 12 December 2015 18: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Where can we find those literate people who could write new articles of this Constitution so that we do not need to return to this issue after some time.

          After some time and the newly adopted Constitution will be obsolete. There are no eternal laws! But it will be necessary to change the Basic Law as applied to realities anyway, sooner or later, better - in a timely manner.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • alexej123
    alexej123 13 December 2015 01: 06 New
    0
    That's right, and the deputy receives a salary.
  • onix757
    onix757 12 December 2015 10: 15 New
    +5
    The deputy Ilya Ponomarev is especially on guard ...


    Moscow, December 12 - AIF-Moscow.
    Federation Council speaker Valentina Matvienko saidthat the Russian Constitution has proved that fundamental changes to the fundamental law not requiredreports RSN.
    “The Constitution today reliably ensures the stable sustainable development of the country, the rights and freedoms of citizens, our national interests on the world stage, and the Russian state and society over the years have never encountered problems, situations that could not be resolved within the framework of the current Constitution,” she said.
    ------------------------
    Threat Apparently the extension of the presidential term for 6 years was the most significant drawback of the constitution, which for some reason was eliminated quickly and efficiently. Edros did not bother about the procedural aspects, but simply satisfied another wish.
    1. Was mammoth
      Was mammoth 12 December 2015 11: 02 New
      +7
      Quote: onix757
      Federation Council speaker Valentina Matvienko said ....

      Well, just remember how she became a speaker to understand her attitude to the Constitution
  • avvg
    avvg 12 December 2015 06: 58 New
    +9
    The constitution must be popular and must protect and protect the interests of the people.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 12 December 2015 07: 11 New
      11
      Quote: avvg
      The constitution must be popular and must protect and protect the interests of the people.

      in this case, the Constitution of the USSR must be returned.
      1. Loner_53
        Loner_53 12 December 2015 07: 14 New
        10
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        in this case, the Constitution of the USSR must be returned.

        With your lips and God’s ears smile
        1. fraer
          fraer 12 December 2015 07: 38 New
          +3
          Quote: Loner_53
          With your lips and God’s ears

          Duc, what was the matter? Forward (backward) to the USSR !!! fellow
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 09 New
            -10
            Quote: fraer
            ? Forward (backward) to the USSR !!!

            I agree, yes, yes, money will be enough for everything winked
            1. fraer
              fraer 12 December 2015 08: 15 New
              25
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              I agree, yes, yes, money will be enough for everything

              And I still remember that ...
              What, nevertheless, the right word was invented for the Soviet period of life - stagnation. Really. Complete stagnation !!!
              You are 10 years old. Mom gave you one ruble and sent you to the store:
              - Buy, son, a loaf of brown bread (12 kopecks), a white loaf (long loaf, 13 kopecks), a liter of milk (28 kopecks), a pack of butter (100 grams, 36 kopecks) and for delivery - ice cream (popsicle - 11 kopecks).
              Went, kicked a rusty can on the road, crossed the street. I went to the store, went to the checkout counter. I dictated my list to my aunt in the window, gave the rupe.
              Cashier yells:
              - Citizens! Skip the baby! The child is let through. They give butter, pour fresh milk into a can. In the next department, the child takes bread, a loaf, puts all this stuff in a string bag and goes out into the bright sun, into the street. Again he crosses the street, goes to the corner, extends eleven kopecks to another aunt, gets silver ice cream, then turns him around, bites, licks, eats up in a second and lazily lashes home. The ruble is finally over.
              He gives the string bag and runs to play football in the yard.
              And in the evening, having done his homework, he sits down to watch "The Elusive" or "In the Animal World" on TV.
              Longing .... Stagnation. lol
              1. fraer
                fraer 12 December 2015 08: 19 New
                16
                He is 25 years old. He graduated from college. He works at the scientific research institute as a maneas (junior research assistant). Salary - 110 rubles per month. The calendar is the 83rd year.
                He gets paid and goes where? Right, to the store! All the same! Again gives the cashier a rupee. Again he buys everything from the list above, minus ice cream. It's a shame somehow.
                Instead of ice cream, he buys three newspapers for 9 cents. And on the subway for a nickle goes home.
                Near the house he stops at a stall and buys a pack of Belomor for 22 kopecks and a box of matches for a kopeck. Earlier, 15 years ago, this "Belomor" for 22 kopecks was unavailable. They won't sell! At least crack! On the contrary, they will give you a cuff! Or they will complain to the father! Everyone knew each other! Now please! You are already big, you earn yourself. Paid 22 kopecks, and you're wearing cigarettes!
                Well, how can you live like that, tell me in mercy! Pancake! for decades nothing has changed! Neither prices nor people! Stagnation!!! fellow
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 34 New
                  -5
                  Quote: fraer
                  and buys a pack of "Belomor" for 22 kopecks

                  Sorry, we have a smoke on coupons wassat
                  1. onix757
                    onix757 12 December 2015 11: 33 New
                    +7
                    Sorry, we have a smoke on coupons

                    I would gladly exchange any canned food from the Union for the most expensive modern "sausage". Canned food was made with natural oil / tomato, and if vegetable, then without any vinegar. The people are now poisoning all kinds of shit. If the authorities introduced Soviet guests and fed the country with them, this would be an achievement, and therefore made the guests optional, since they cannot even make canned food using them. Incidentally, do not know how much a 3-liter can of natural tomato juice costs today?
                    1. your1970
                      your1970 12 December 2015 22: 26 New
                      +3
                      the cost of 700 gram cans of tomato paste and water — exactly by this technology it was made in the USSR.
                      Or do you think that then they were made from freshly squeezed tomatoes ????? !!!!!!! fellow A birch sting of birch trees (with pulp) ???? fellow
                      And vinegar, it was an eternal preservative and was and will be in canned vegetables ...
                  2. vvv-73
                    vvv-73 12 December 2015 11: 48 New
                    +6
                    It was, but these are already perestroika times. And before the year 85 they didn’t hear about coupons.
              2. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 31 New
                -1
                Quote: fraer
                Cashier yells:
                - Citizens! Skip the baby! Child miss

                I immediately broke a tear, I remembered a cashier weighing 120 kilos, who, having weighed a slap in the head, yelled at Chaliapin-A's voice, well, to the queue **** laughing
                Quote: fraer
                And in the evening, having done his homework, he sits down to watch "The Elusive" or "In the Animal World" on TV.

                And at the most interesting moment - BAM, the TV burned out crying
                1. fraer
                  fraer 12 December 2015 08: 45 New
                  +9
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  I immediately broke a tear, I remembered a cashier weighing 120 kilos, who, having weighed a slap in the head, yelled at Chaliapin-A's voice, well, to the queue ****

                  Injury is felt to this day. Sorry. crying
                  I am also a victim of such an aunt. For a bun that he stole, not to please his stomach, but purely out of interest. lol
                  They still call the framer request
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 56 New
                    +1
                    Quote: fraer
                    They still call the framer

                    Ofiget-etozh how much you for one bun prosecutor requested belay
                    1. fraer
                      fraer 12 December 2015 09: 04 New
                      +3
                      There is a rupe entrance, exit two. request
                      Let's tie up, and then from the back rows, they will start to buzz. The movie is quite interesting, and here we started a bazaar hi
                      Let's see how people breathe.
                      1. Alexander Romanov
                        Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 18 New
                        0
                        Quote: fraer
                        Let's tie, and then from the back rows

                        After them, the peel from the seeds is constantly swept out.
                        Quote: fraer
                        The movie is quite interesting,

                        Yes, so-so, an endless series, I'm afraid I will not live up to the last series.
                      2. stalkerwalker
                        stalkerwalker 12 December 2015 09: 23 New
                        +6
                        That's why I love VO, it's the morning "positive" - ​​you read, think (?) And comprehend ... And all day you consider yourself smart ...
                        laughing
                      3. fraer
                        fraer 12 December 2015 09: 49 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Yes, so-so, an endless series, I'm afraid I will not live up to the last series.

                        Well, Duc, I would have sat down at the gallery, since the position obliges me to do it. And I would sleep in two holes. And you.....
    2. NORILCHANIN
      NORILCHANIN 12 December 2015 07: 37 New
      +7
      Return not only the Constitution of the USSR, but also the Criminal Code of the USSR with all serious articles.
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 12 December 2015 08: 08 New
        0
        Especially 121 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. I can imagine how the "liberals" will yell, and especially Europe. In the United States (in some states), the attitude towards homosexuals is also not rosy.
        1. Bayonet
          Bayonet 12 December 2015 08: 24 New
          -1
          "Who is talking about what, and ...." In general, it is clear. wink
      2. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 12 December 2015 08: 33 New
        +7
        And articles on free education and medicine must be made truly Soviet. Every citizen has the right to free medicine and education. To be hobbled to a doctor with an ailment. He --- 500 rubles of tests, and you just open the main booklet of the country to him .. oh, dreams . bully And then we live in a wild forest in many ways.
    3. sa-ag
      sa-ag 12 December 2015 09: 15 New
      +2
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      in this case, the Constitution of the USSR must be returned.

      Well, in this case, return the USSR, because the constitution is it, the truth for these thoughts - attempts on the authorities will immediately find the article :-)
  • venaya
    venaya 12 December 2015 07: 03 New
    +6
    For example, on the British Isles, there is no constitution, but the "smart guys" call it "constitutional monarchy" and nothing. True, these figures from these islands still manage to write to all and sundry all sorts of constitutions, and they strictly require others to fulfill them. Well, aren't you impudent?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. alexej123
      alexej123 13 December 2015 01: 14 New
      0
      They have a case law system.
  • Goga101
    Goga101 12 December 2015 07: 03 New
    +4
    The most "interesting" thing in the article is not there - about the fact that "our" constitution records the prevalence of "not our laws" over Russian ones, and while this is so, what kind of "sovereignty" are we talking about? hi
    1. tanit
      tanit 12 December 2015 07: 08 New
      0
      The most interesting thing is that these laws are now on the side, or are you not up to date? hi
      Quote: Goga101
      The most "interesting" thing in the article is not there - about the fact that "our" constitution records the prevalence of "not our laws" over Russian ones, and while this is so, what kind of "sovereignty" are we talking about? hi
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 07: 12 New
      -1
      Quote: Goga101
      There is no most "interesting" in the article - about the fact that in "our" constitution the prevalence of "not our laws" over Russian ones is recorded,

      Russia bolt put on it hi
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 07: 43 New
        +1
        Quote: dengy12
        support the gcd
        collection of signatures for the referendum http://refnod.ru/

        Lay it out again and I'll ask the administration to send you to the ban.
        Quote: dengy12
        We propose the following amendments to the Constitution through the All-Russian Referendum:

        Yeah, I’ve already heard about whose money and what kind of organizations they are hiding under the GCD, they are collecting signatures.
        1. fraer
          fraer 12 December 2015 07: 58 New
          +4
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Lay it out again and I'll ask the administration to send you to the ban.
          Quote: dengy12

          Alexander Romanov! You violate
          Article 29.
          Item 1.
          Everyone is guaranteed freedom of thought and speech !!!

          With one I agree that GCD, radish. lol
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 02 New
            +3
            Quote: fraer
            Article 29.
            Item 1.
            Everyone is guaranteed freedom of thought and speech.

            Colleague, I oppose you, because ...
            There p. 4 Art. 13, which sounds like this:
            It is forbidden to create and operate public associations whose goals or actions are aimed at forcibly changing the foundations of the constitutional system and violating the integrity of the Russian Federation
            wassat
            Quote: fraer
            With one I agree that GCD, radish

            The GCD is a radish, but the GCD is not related to this, the signatures are collected by such well-known companies as Mary Kay, Orifleim, the patriots of Russia, so to speak.
            The rams have beguiled.
            1. fraer
              fraer 12 December 2015 08: 07 New
              +2
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Colleague, I oppose you, because ...
              There p. 4 Art. 13, which sounds like this:
              It is forbidden to create and operate public associations whose goals or actions are aimed at forcibly changing the foundations of the constitutional system and violating the integrity of the Russian Federation

              Nightmare!!! There is no happiness in life. What? Back to the bunk?
              And ... on the tundra ... where the courier rushes ... belay
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 35 New
                +2
                Quote: fraer
                And ... on the tundra ... where the courier rushes ..

                5 years is not a term, you can stand on one leg.
      2. NORILCHANIN
        NORILCHANIN 12 December 2015 07: 44 New
        +2
        I am only FOR and I think the Constitution should be at least half changed through REFERENDUM. The individual needs to be REMOVED from the feeding trough and the public domain.
  • yuriy55
    yuriy55 12 December 2015 07: 12 New
    +4
    The following lines cause strange feelings:

    Article 75

    1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Monetary issue is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation are not allowed.
    2. Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it exercises independently of other government bodies.
    3. The system of taxes levied on the federal budget and the general principles of taxation and fees in the Russian Federation are established by federal law.
    4. State loans are issued in the manner determined by federal law and are placed on a voluntary basis.

    In the light of these provisions guesses torment who is guilty of such high inflation in the country?
    And there is such a hasty adoption by a clear superior advantage:
    58,43% voted for the adoption of the constitution, 41,57% voted against ...


    But ... one consolation ...
    "Every nation is worthy of its ruler" and, I add, my Constitution ...
    wink
    1. venaya
      venaya 12 December 2015 07: 38 New
      +1
      Quote: yuriy55
      And there is such a hasty adoption by a clear superior advantage:
      58,43% voted for the adoption of the constitution, 41,57% voted against ...

      Dear, you have completely confused me! Please let me know: how many percent did you need to get those who voted in favor in order to accept the new constitution? And how to calculate the percentage: from the number of voters (at least one person) or from the total number of people who have the right to vote. According to the laws of the Russian Federation in force on voting day, the counting of votes had to be carried out on the basis of the number of voters who did not actually vote, but the number of those who actually had the right to vote. If we take the principle of counting votes according to the law in force at that time, then the number of those who voted "for" the constitution does not in any way reach the figure of 50% required by the law, which automatically indicates the rejection of this constitution into action. Conclusion: the Constitution was adopted in spite of the legislation in force at that time and therefore is illegal! Any objections?
      1. yuriy55
        yuriy55 12 December 2015 11: 06 New
        +1
        Quote: venaya

        Dear, you completely confused me! ...


        Unravel:

        Adoption (1993) [edit | edit wiki text]
        Main article: Popular vote on the Constitution of Russia
        On October 15, 1993, President Boris Yeltsin signed a decree on popular vote on the draft constitution of Russia and approved the "Regulation on popular vote on the draft Constitution of the Russian Federation on December 12, 1993" [7]. According to the Regulation, the Constitution was considered approved if the majority of voters who participated in the vote voted for its adoption, provided that more than half the number of registered voters took part in the vote. The term “popular vote” (and not “referendum”) was used to circumvent the provisions of the current RSFSR referendum law, according to article 9 of which a referendum could be appointed only by the Congress of People's Deputies or the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation [8], but in article 1 of this law, both of these terms are equivalent.

        Voting took place on December 12, 1993. 58,43% voted for the adoption of the constitution, 41,57% voted against. The new constitution was adopted and entered into force on the day of its publication in the "Rossiyskaya Gazeta" - December 25, 1993.

        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Конституция_Российской_Федерации

        So I say: Accepted !!! fellow Accepted !!! fellow And with what margin of vote ... recourse
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 14 New
      +3
      Quote: yuriy55
      The following lines cause strange feelings:

      Agree
      Quote: yuriy55
      1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Monetary issue is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation are not allowed.

      To remove it, I would turn around, and my money in quality would be better and more beautiful repeat
      Quote: yuriy55
      2. Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it exercises independently of other government bodies.

      Putin said the dollar at five, then five.
      Quote: yuriy55
      3. The system of taxes levied on the federal budget and the general principles of taxation and fees in the Russian Federation are established by federal law.

      Brothers in shock is their feeding trough. In nature, chaos.
      Quote: yuriy55
      4. State loans are issued in the manner determined by federal law and are placed on a voluntary basis.

      The people are completely overwhelmed, do not want to buy Gozymes voluntarily, they need to be fixed.
      Quote: yuriy55
      In the light of these provisions guesses torment who is guilty of such high inflation in the country?

      Medvedev, of course, still laughing
    3. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 12 December 2015 18: 56 New
      +2
      Quote: yuriy55
      In the light of these provisions guesses torment who is guilty of such high inflation in the country?

      And the Central Bank of this very Russian Federation does not obey. And he obeys the US banking system. From here and proceed. Straight on Kozma Prutkov: "Find the beginning of everything and you will understand a lot."
  • Teberii
    Teberii 12 December 2015 07: 12 New
    +4
    Who decided that the Constitution should not be changed. The time of dashing changes of the 90s has passed. The constitution should not lag behind the time and do not forget It was already changed when the term of the presidency was increased. And Putin was elected for the third term. Again, the conflict with us is not prohibited by the constitution in other countries.
  • EvgNik
    EvgNik 12 December 2015 07: 15 New
    +6
    We have any law (including the Constitution) written in such a way that to circumvent them (legally!) Spit any lawyer (or lawyer) of the middle hand. So the same oligarchs spit on laws - money decides everything, not the law.
  • Kyustenkats
    Kyustenkats 12 December 2015 07: 17 New
    0
    It is necessary that there are comments on the rules of the SDA, and on the Constitution, a volume of comments should be issued on what and how to understand. For example, Art.29, Clause 2 is often used as the right of large, nominal religions to crush new and / or small denominations that supposedly steal their flock.
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 12 December 2015 07: 53 New
      +3
      Quote: Kyustenkats
      It is necessary that there are comments on the rules of the SDA, and on the Constitution, a volume of comments should be issued on what and how to understand. For example, Art.29, Clause 2 is often used as the right of large, nominal religions to crush new and / or small denominations that supposedly steal their flock.

      Comments will not give anything, they have no legal force. Comments are not dogma, they are only the comments of the commentator or group of commentators. Strange as it may seem, traffic rules are not law, which is why they are laid as God will put on a soul. Laws should be written in clear language and not cause a double interpretation, this is an axiom, but it does not work for us.
    2. excomandante
      excomandante 12 December 2015 10: 07 New
      0
      Of course. comments on the Constitution exist in the form of a weighty volume for a long time, as without them, heartfelt ...
    3. alexej123
      alexej123 13 December 2015 01: 19 New
      0
      You have already been answered. By the way, to all codes, and to the Constitution, including there are comments. But, they do not have legal force.
  • Boos
    Boos 12 December 2015 07: 21 New
    +3
    Bring back the Stalinist!
    1. Loner_53
      Loner_53 12 December 2015 08: 11 New
      +1
      Quote: Boos
      Bring back the Stalinist!



      Do not rage the soul sad
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 36 New
      0
      Quote: Boos
      Bring back the Stalinist!

      May everyone stir up their own constitution, and I look at my wishes, it hurts a lot, but there is only one constitution.
      1. Loner_53
        Loner_53 12 December 2015 08: 59 New
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        May everyone stir up their own constitution, and I look at my wishes, it hurts a lot, but there is only one constitution.

        The time will come and you will feel sick under the liberal wing, give time, you are our liberal.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 06 New
          0
          Quote: Loner_53

          The time will come and you will feel sick under the liberal wing

          Yes, I’m kind of sick of liberals.
          Quote: Loner_53
          , you are our liberal.

          Oh fuck I'm liberal? Ahahaha wassat
    3. alicante11
      alicante11 12 December 2015 09: 00 New
      +1
      Unfortunately, without Comrade Stalin himself, nothing will come of it.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 07 New
        0
        Quote: alicante11
        Unfortunately, without Comrade Stalin himself, nothing will come of it.

        Everything you do is not like people.
        1. alicante11
          alicante11 12 December 2015 13: 28 New
          0
          Everything you do is not like people.


          Unfortunately, not with me, but with us all, and not only in Russia.
  • Kyustenkats
    Kyustenkats 12 December 2015 07: 22 New
    +2
    In my opinion, as long as there is no national ideology, no goal (where is the Russian (?) People going), there is no point in having a constitution, because it obeys the will of the people, clearly expressed in the idea. "the tribe is a thought that scares those who are not let go by other thoughts."
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 12 December 2015 16: 12 New
      +2
      Quote: Kyustenkats
      In my opinion, there is no national ideology, no goal

      "When a society has no pants color differentiation, there is no purpose!"
  • kig
    kig 12 December 2015 07: 30 New
    +4
    There are also points that raise questions, for example:

    Article 19
    1. All are equal before the law and the court.
    - But is it really so?
    1. Teberii
      Teberii 12 December 2015 07: 38 New
      0
      All are equal, but there is more equal.
    2. askort154
      askort154 12 December 2015 08: 08 New
      -1
      kig ..... Article 19
      1. All are equal before the law and the court. - But is it really so?


      You have to understand - everyone is equal BEFORE the law and the court. I.e,
      until he crossed the THRESHOLD. But when he entered, there are their own traditions - a wallet or a bell. Therefore, the people have called him for a long time,
      "the most humane". In Russia, this is a centuries-old tradition, regardless of political transformations.
    3. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 16 New
      0
      Quote: kig
      1. All are equal before the law and the court. - But is it really so?

      Of course, everyone is equal before the law, but the law is not equal for everyone.
      Not understood? Well read it again wink
  • fa2998
    fa2998 12 December 2015 07: 47 New
    +5
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    in this case, the Constitution of the USSR must be returned.

    Well, yes, only in Article 6 change the CPSU to "United Russia". In my opinion, at any time, at any power for them, the Constitution is just a piece of paper that can be shoved into one place. One thing is written in the Constitution, its other IMPLEMENTATION .Remember Article 29- "everyone is GUARANTEED freedom of thought and speech" -but we have "anti-Soviet", "anti-state" and "fifth column". And do not attribute me to Makarevich and Navalny. No. hi
  • tanit
    tanit 12 December 2015 07: 50 New
    +1
    But the article made many read the Constitution laughing And this is already great.
    Dear administration, try - publish articles of repeated Soviet constitutions (without indicating affiliation) - I am sure they will criticize in the same way. laughing
    1. venaya
      venaya 12 December 2015 08: 22 New
      -3
      Quote: tanit
      Dear administration, try - publish articles of repeated Soviet constitutions (without indicating affiliation) - I am sure they will criticize in the same way.

      My suggestion is even better: to publish all the constitutions that we had, then give the right to vote for any of them. There was such an experiment, so at 90% they voted for the version of the constitution of 1936. I believe that having freedom of choice is more honest, people should have a choice, violence in this case is not permissible.
      1. Banshee
        Banshee 12 December 2015 10: 04 New
        +1
        An interesting thought, but hardly a ride. Well this is how much you need to read? Here, thank God, a page and a half material can hardly be mastered, they read through the line. And a little more - through the paragraph. And immediately to the comments. And so 70% of "readers".
        1. venaya
          venaya 12 December 2015 16: 37 New
          0
          This proposal has already been described. Here, what is important: the only constitution that passed a full-fledged public discussion was precisely in 1936. If it had been adopted without amendments, then we could have had alternative elections back then, only the administrative resource worked: the officials were afraid of the very possible fact of separation from the trough, then they could not overcome this barrier. Today, it is not the officials themselves who are at the trough, but the "businessmen", they are less tied to elections (we do not choose them, but they choose us). All subsequent constitutions only worsened our situation. But everyone does not need to read, active members of society, 10% percent, the rest are led by "authorities".
  • wei
    wei 12 December 2015 08: 03 New
    +3
    to the question
    Is there any reason to criticize certain points of the Basic Law?

    I will answer - Yes there is. Not even so much a claim to an article as to compliance with the rules that it sets out
    Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 75

    Article 75
    1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Money emission is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. The introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation is not allowed.
    2. Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation....
    As soon as these points begin to be fulfilled, life will improve.
    1. Loner_53
      Loner_53 12 December 2015 08: 14 New
      0
      Quote: wei
      As soon as these points begin to be fulfilled, life will improve.

      But the truth is so! smile
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 08 New
        0
        Quote: Loner_53
        But the truth is so!

        I do not understand how this is true? But what about the Stalinist constitution?
    2. tanit
      tanit 12 December 2015 08: 16 New
      +1
      Quote: wei
      I will answer - Yes there is. Not even so much a claim to an article as to compliance with the rules that it sets out
      Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 75

      But this is strong. soldier
      Quote: wei

      Article 75
      1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Monetary issue is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation are not allowed.
      2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation ....
      As soon as these points begin to be fulfilled, life will improve.

      Sincerely. soldier
    3. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 12 December 2015 19: 02 New
      0
      Quote: wei
      As soon as these points begin to be fulfilled, life will improve.

      After the Central Bank ceases to obey the United States, and will be subordinate to the Russian Federation!
    4. your1970
      your1970 12 December 2015 22: 53 New
      0
      Sorry and those who besides the Central Bank print money from us,planted by 186 article of the Criminal Code
      The manufacture for the purpose of selling counterfeit bank notes of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, a metal coin, government securities or other securities in the currency of the Russian Federation or foreign currency or securities in foreign currency, as well as the storage, transportation for the purpose of marketing and the sale of obviously fake bank notes The Central Bank of the Russian Federation, a metal coin, government securities or other securities in the currency of the Russian Federation or foreign currency or securities a magician in foreign currency shall be punished by forced labor for a term of up to five years or by imprisonment for a term of up to eight years with a fine of up to one million rubles or in the amount of the wage or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to five years or without it.

      Do you not like something in the 75 article ???
  • Strashila
    Strashila 12 December 2015 08: 37 New
    +2
    And when this holiday was a red calendar day and a day off.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. creak
      creak 12 December 2015 10: 58 New
      0
      Quote: Strashila

      And when this holiday was a red calendar day and a day off.


      And it’s nothing that we have such a holiday as Victory Day on May 9, when it was also not a day off, but a working day ...
      So what of this?
      As you know, for many the grass used to be greener, the sun was brighter, and the girls didn’t have anything to say ... good
  • slaventi
    slaventi 12 December 2015 08: 41 New
    11
    Okku is a national constitution written by the Americans after a bloody coup
    Article 15 paragraph 4 The universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than those provided by law, the rules of the international treaty shall apply. This means that Russian law is embedded in international law, and Russia must reckon with foreign rules that are established by foreign organizations (for example, the UN is the leading organization in the field of codification and development of international law).
    Also, this article establishes the priority of international law over national law, I quote: “If the international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those prescribed by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply.”
    Our constitution has an article (Article 3, paragraph 1), which reads: "The bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people." But it turns out that the 15-th article puts international law above the power of the people. Thus, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as it were, says that, yes, the people, of course, are “the bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power,” but international law is still more important and important than the Russian people, and the opinion of international organizations should be a priority, rather than opinion of the Russian people.
    Article 13 paragraph 2 No ideology can be established as state or mandatory. This article establishes a ban on state ideology. At the same time, Article 13, paragraph 1, states: "In the Russian Federation, ideological diversity is recognized." This means that in Russia, anyone, including representatives of foreign states, except the Russian state itself, can engage in propaganda and ideology.

    Article 75 clauses 1, 2 1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Money emission is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. The introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation is not allowed. 2. Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it exercises independently of other government bodies.
    Article 75 (paragraphs 1 and 2) states that “the monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble”, and “monetary emission is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation”, “which it carries out independently of other public authorities”. It turns out that the Russian state cannot control the issue of money. This function was taken by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which operates independently of the state. Who does the central bank report to? As you know, Russia is a member of the International Monetary Fund, and therefore the IMF is the only structure whose instructions should be followed by the Central Bank.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 08: 58 New
      -2
      Quote: slaventi
      Okku constitutional constitution

      So we are in occupation now belay e mine, lived calmly and then oops, I was occupied crying
      1. Banshee
        Banshee 12 December 2015 10: 05 New
        +2
        There it is like ... Went to dig PPSH ...
    2. wei
      wei 12 December 2015 13: 49 New
      +2
      If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than those provided by law, the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

      and should be
      respect international treaties (between third parties) if they do not contradict the constitution of the Russian Federation, treating international treaties with the Russian Federation violating the constitution of the Russian Federation as not legal ....
      everything is aptly noticed good
    3. your1970
      your1970 12 December 2015 22: 55 New
      -1
      29 Article. USSR relations with other states are being built
      based on the principles of sovereign equality; of mutual
      refusal to use force or threat of force; inviolability of borders;
      territorial integrity of states; peace settlement
      disputes; non-interference in internal affairs; respect for rights
      man and fundamental freedoms; equality and rights of peoples
      manage your fate; cooperation between states;
      conscientious fulfillment of obligations arising from universally recognized principles and norms of international law, from
      international treaties concluded by the USSR.


      Apparently the Americans also wrote the Constitution of the USSR ?????
  • slaventi
    slaventi 12 December 2015 08: 48 New
    +6
    Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of October 10 2003 N 5 Moscow
    On the application by courts of general jurisdiction of universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation 0
    16. In case of difficulties in interpreting the generally recognized principles and norms of international law, international treaties of the Russian Federation, recommend that the courts use the acts and decisions of international organizations, including UN bodies and its specialized agencies, as well as apply to the Legal Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation (for example, to clarify issues related to the duration of an international treaty, the composition of the states participating in the treaty, international practice of its application). That is, our authorities are subordinate to international specialized institutions. For example, how the Central Bank of the Russian Federation submits to the IMF all according to the constitution
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 01 New
      0
      Quote: slaventi
      .For example, how the Central Bank of the Russian Federation submits to the IMF all according to the constitution

      Two legs in my mouth, here not so long ago Ivan Tarasov argued that the US Federal Reserve belongs to us. Guys, and who do you read by the name, who writes all this?
  • The comment was deleted.
  • bear
    bear 12 December 2015 08: 54 New
    +6
    Constitution Day is not a holiday, but rather a day of sorrow. I am for returning to the USSR.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 12 December 2015 09: 09 New
      -1
      Quote: bear
      Constitution Day is not a holiday, but rather a day of sorrow.

      I'm swelling.
      1. free
        free 12 December 2015 11: 18 New
        +1
        would you calm down, and then your komenty every other time, tired!
  • Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 12 December 2015 08: 55 New
    +6
    I read the entire Constitution (as needed).

    In court, by the way, references to it do not work, although formally it has the highest legal force. First of all, it is necessary to properly execute what is written in it, and then to raise the question of its change.

    It is necessary to make the Central Bank responsible for the ruble (as it is written).
    It is necessary to make the court treat everyone equally, so that there are no Vasilievs, and that bulk people do not walk free (as is written).
    Need section "rights and freedoms ..."perform in the form in which it is written; this applies, for example, to the dignity of the person, personal integrity (not only of the palitsaev, but of all citizens), privacy (so that officials do not come to families for children), the inviolability of the home, and so on ...
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 12 December 2015 09: 27 New
      +3
      Quote: Gormengast
      and that bulk did not go free

      These very "bulk", in my opinion, the team to discredit the protest movement, as soon as one emerges, they are right there and the electorate immediately associates this very protest movement with the "fifth column", "white tape" and other words suggested from the TV, the electorate immediately stands on the side of the authorities, and of course she is the beneficiary here, even the Latins said "look for who benefits from it"
  • vezunchik
    vezunchik 12 December 2015 09: 42 New
    +2
    most of the population was against her
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Was mammoth
    Was mammoth 12 December 2015 09: 53 New
    +2
    The law, that the pole turned wherever, went there. ”This popular proverb did not appear now. So it was under the tsars, and so now.
    So, Putin "turned" and the governors, deputies, measures "are people whom the people did not directly elect, but, on the other hand, these are people personally" loyal "to the President ... Well, the rest is a matter of technology. Everything is according to the Basic Law. The Constitutional Court will confirm.
  • provincial
    provincial 12 December 2015 09: 54 New
    +2
    I wonder who will answer and how, "Was there a coup in the Russian Federation in 1991, or did we voluntarily switch to capitalism?"
    1. Was mammoth
      Was mammoth 12 December 2015 10: 03 New
      +7
      Quote: provincial
      I wonder who will answer and how, "Was there a coup in the Russian Federation in 1991, or did we voluntarily switch to capitalism?"

      I would say: "There was a counter-revolution. And the coup was in 1993."
      1. provincial
        provincial 12 December 2015 10: 17 New
        0
        Then the next question is "Is the existing government legitimate?"
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag 12 December 2015 10: 30 New
          +3
          Quote: provincial
          Then the next question is "Is the existing government legitimate?"

          since Yeltsin’s mandate of a deputy of the Supreme Council was assigned by deputy Kazannik in violation of the regulations, then everything else is the same
        2. provincial
          provincial 12 December 2015 10: 41 New
          +2
          I will answer myself, then why the hell are we spreading rot Ukrainian. Let them live as they want, it is necessary to forget the word "brotherly people" and that's it. If you want to watch, go to the zoo and stop feeding and flirting. Yes, it will hurt someone {relatives, etc.}, and that our former citizens do not live in other countries, let us also add these countries to the list of fraternal ones and give everything free or cheap. How long will this continue? There they gave billions not to repay the debt, in another place they wrote off billions, somewhere they stole by mistake. When we ourselves will live, maybe our leadership will finally remember about its citizens. We will not get out of crises, but everyone tells us difficult times, tighten your bellies .Maybe and the management, too, tighten this belly. Let your salaries and so on lead to the national average.
        3. Was mammoth
          Was mammoth 12 December 2015 10: 55 New
          +1
          Quote: provincial
          Then the next question is "Is the existing government legitimate?"

          I will answer you with a question: "What do you mean by legitimacy and from what historical moment?"
          1. provincial
            provincial 12 December 2015 11: 00 New
            +1
            I will answer briefly from October 1917 from the moment when the Bolsheviks took power from the chatterbox Kerensky and defended their power for four years.
            1. Was mammoth
              Was mammoth 12 December 2015 11: 33 New
              +1
              Quote: provincial
              I will answer briefly ....

              For me, not a lawyer, legitimacy is from casuistry, arose from the desire of those in power from creeping into this power. Poroshenko or Assad, Russian princes or tsars, Lenin or Yeltsin .... Depends on strength, historical moment and on political beliefs of a citizen or state. Legitimacy is just the same as tastes.
        4. Gormenghast
          Gormenghast 12 December 2015 14: 54 New
          +3
          Then the next question is "Is the existing government legitimate?"


          Since 1991, power has been illegitimate, since Yeltsin, elected president of the RSFSR (president of part of a single federal state), for some reason declared himself president of another state (the Russian Federation).

          Since 1993, power has been criminal since the legitimate Supreme Council was destroyed by force. By the way, just like in Ukraine now, the fake president tried to ban the Communist Party.

          Since 1996, criminal power has been illegitimate, since the majority voted for Zyuganov, but was rigged in favor of Yeltsin's insult. The king was naked. laughing

          Since 2000, the authorities have raised doubts about their legitimacy, since no "successor"The Constitution of the Russian Federation is not provided for and this is pressure on voters.

          Since 2004, as far as I know, Putin has won relatively honestly (there were, of course, fraud, but this could not affect the overall result).

          At the moment, power is legitimate not only in form, but also in content. Putin is president not because the majority of those who voted for him, but because he is supported by the real majority of the population.
    2. Gormenghast
      Gormenghast 12 December 2015 14: 45 New
      +3
      have we voluntarily switched to capitalism?

      This is a joke, huh? I personally, like the majority of the population of the USSR, in March 1991 voted to preserve the USSR.

      And about capitalism - no one asked at all. EBN, I apologize for the expression, the people pooled.
  • 3axap82
    3axap82 12 December 2015 10: 07 New
    0
    Normal Constitution in the Russian Federation. BUT the Constitution and many laws are not followed. And why? For there is no civil society that is able to resist the authorities by controlling their implementation: no one organizes strikes, there are no mass lawsuits in the ECHR (yes, yes, do not sue our officials, for example, a friend or a financial partner of a judge) the people themselves do not create any trade unions etc. Why not fight? Because the Russian economy is: Oligarchs sell oil -> salaries are paid to public sector employees (from teachers to FSO employees) -> from public sector employees, money goes into the service sector (from stalls to buying real estate, this money in large mass floats abroad from where they bring consumer goods) and into the pockets of manufacturers of domestic goods (we produce little and buy even less of this from many Russian TV sets or cars?) -> everyone pays taxes. Thus, the people do not produce anything and the authorities, for this reason, do not give a damn about them, they feed a little and that's it. And if it starts strikes, it doesn't matter if the production of Lada is stopped, the world economy will easily survive.
    So the matter is not in the text of the Constitution.
    1. Denis Skiff
      Denis Skiff 12 December 2015 10: 34 New
      0
      in a word, a mess? Well, at least something and someone in the country works?
      1. 3axap82
        3axap82 12 December 2015 14: 41 New
        +3
        Everything that brings our country foreign exchange earnings works well.
        Oil, gas, titanium-aluminum, defense industry products, "commercial space". But all these industries do not make the country independent from the world market.
        By the way, this economy worked under Yeltsin. Read the stories of our defense plants. They sold and then everything we sell now. And buy the same abroad.
    2. wei
      wei 12 December 2015 14: 00 New
      0
      For there is no civil society that is able to resist the authorities by controlling their implementation: no one organizes strikes, there are no mass claims in the ECHR

      power is a part of civil society (if not occupiers)
      to control the situation all submit income statement and all data in the public domain ..
      1. Was mammoth
        Was mammoth 12 December 2015 14: 18 New
        +2
        Quote: wei
        power is a part of civil society (if not occupiers)

        Unfortunately, the authorities behave like occupiers towards the people. Therefore, the majority perceives it as something foreign.
        Quote: wei
        in order to control the situation it is necessary to force everyone to submit a declaration of income and all data in the public domain ..

        I understand from the authorities. What may be the declaration of retirement. And, here the officials feeding around declarations will obviously be added.
    3. Suvorov
      Suvorov 12 December 2015 21: 02 New
      +2
      Quote: 3axap82
      there are no mass claims in the ECHR (! yes, yes, do not sue our officials in our court


      Which European court? What are you? The European Court of Human Rights is just another tool of the “world government”. It exists to "pacify the rebellious" in Europe. It may have been created with a good purpose, but it has turned into a kind of “whip” with which you can always “teach a guilty country”. Yes, any citizen of a European country that is a member of the Council of Europe can sue the authorities of his country to this “supranational body” if he considers that they (the authorities) violated his right to a fair and impartial consideration of his “case” and what? “It was smooth on paper,” as they say. Is it not enough that these complaints have been "dusting" for years in this court? If they find something “interesting” for which the authorities of any country can be “hooked”, then they are put “under the cloth” (so that they can be “pulled out” at the right time). The rest is "screened out" and returned back to the applicant without consideration. When necessary, they “pull out” and inflate a “scandal” in the press, which affects the ratings of politicians who are currently in power. And why do you think all European politicians are so "silk" and obey the Americans and Brussels? Of course, there are many tools: economic, political, and others that the empire uses (read: the Fed, transnational corporations and the US Administration they hired), but the EU and the Council of Europe are some of the main ones. I'm not talking about Russia: we pay money to be “strained”, “crushed” by us, slyly hiding it under the guise of “protecting human rights”. At one time, we chose for ourselves this path of “joining the ranks of civilized humanity”, but today we know who is hiding under this “mask”. Now, why do we need this? There, after all, “double standards” are openly used against Russia and Russian speakers. We must leave the Council of Europe and develop our justice, make it transparent and impartial. This can be done only through their institutions of "civil society" (not bought by the West). And now what: all public organizations of lawyers will be against it, they earn money by filing these “lawsuits” ...
  • mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 12 December 2015 10: 10 New
    +2
    During my life, two constitutions have already appeared. The last of them was composed by a group of "comrades" under the strict guidance of foreign curators. The approval of the constitution in 1993 is doubtful, because as I remember our "friends and partners" did not yell about legitimacy, because it suited them. The reference to the constitution is the last argument of the liberals, when they have absolutely nothing to cover up for the blatant and diocy of the authorities in the economic sphere. They say that private property is inviolable, and everyone else hangs at least. CONCLUSION: "God forbid, not the last."
  • antiexpert
    antiexpert 12 December 2015 10: 17 New
    +6
    and another art. No. 13 - the prohibition of ideology draws a line under the country))
    1. 3axap82
      3axap82 12 December 2015 14: 47 New
      0
      Why do you need ideology? Will she stop thieves from stealing? We need laws, the will of the people and their common sense. It is easy if people have their own business and property that they will have to defend. Hungry and dependent state employees will demand something from the authorities !? I'm not talking about the "maidans" and "swamp". And about simple everyday requirements.
      Go and demand what you are entitled to under the state labor code. service or enterprise. You will be fired tomorrow.
  • Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 12 December 2015 10: 32 New
    +1
    So, according to the Basic Law, any citizen of the country who has been permanently residing in Russia for at least 10 years can become a president of Russia. This citizen’s age cannot be less than 35 years. It would seem, what is the paradox? And the fact that the Constitution of the Russian Federation says nothing, for example, about the criminal record of the candidate. That is, it turns out that if this or that citizen managed, roughly speaking, to wind up the deadline, for example, for embezzling state property on a particularly large scale, then the path to the presidency is in fact open to him. The Constitution does not preclude the election of such a citizen. Well, that at least is not encouraged ...
    So in all countries where FSA was noted.
  • Karavan-150
    Karavan-150 12 December 2015 10: 38 New
    11
    CONSTITUTION DAY.
    What's "celebrating" ..? !!
    Who wrote this and for what? And who today defends and lobbies "it" in the State Duma ..?
    Happy holiday of the loss of rights and freedoms of citizens! Victory Day of the traitors - liberasts. HAPPY DAY TO YELTSIN AND ALL RUSSIANS.
    1. guzik007
      guzik007 12 December 2015 15: 28 New
      +5
      Karavan-150
      ---------------
      Bravo, Caravan! Your post can summarize the weight of fuss and finish on this.
  • runway
    runway 12 December 2015 10: 38 New
    -3
    I believe that the Constitution of the country should not be rewritten even under the next hands of the leader.
    The fundamental articles of the Constitution must be unchanged for centuries. This should be clear to every citizen of the country. Only in these conditions can a legal state be built. And if you rebuild each time, then you get what we have today - a gangster state.
    Who is rewriting the Constitution and under whom? Who adopts constitutional acts that contradict the current Constitution? Finally, why is the Constitution "not working?"
    Yes, because today's leaders do not need a clear and understandable Constitution. Having stirred up the Constitution with laws that contradict its content, they "catch their fish in troubled waters."
  • Olkass
    Olkass 12 December 2015 10: 42 New
    +9
    Quote: Gormengast
    CB


    Dreaming, one-eyed! Naka is a slaver:
    Article 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation establishes the special constitutional legal status of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, defines its exclusive right to issue money (part 1) and, as the main function, protect and ensure the stability of the ruble (part 2). The status, goals, functions and powers of the Bank of Russia are also determined by Federal Law of July 10, 2002 No. 86-ФЗ “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)” and other federal laws.

    In accordance with Article 3 of the Federal Law “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)”, the objectives of the Bank of Russia are: to protect and ensure the stability of the ruble; development and strengthening of the banking system of the Russian Federation; ensuring stability and development of the national payment system; development of the financial market of the Russian Federation; ensuring the stability of the financial market of the Russian Federation.

    A key element of the legal status of the Bank of Russia is the principle of independence, which is manifested primarily in the fact that the Bank of Russia acts as a special public law institution with the exclusive right to issue money and organize money circulation. It is not a public authority, however, its powers, by their legal nature, relate to the functions of state power, since their implementation involves the application of state coercive measures. The functions and powers stipulated by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)” are performed by the Bank of Russia independently of federal state authorities, state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local governments. The independence of the status of the Bank of Russia is reflected in Article 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as well as in Articles 1 and 2 of the Federal Law “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)”.

    And if you read the position and charter of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, you will generally write in boiling water!
    In a nutshell, the Central Bank is a commercial organization that does not submit to ANY AUTHORITY of Russia. He is not responsible for the obligations of the state, at the same time managing the financial system of the country. The Board of Directors of the Central Bank does not include ANY REPRESENTATIVE of any current government, even if only as an observer! Those. it turns out that we are paying the state, IT delegates the right to manage the financial resources and the entire financial system of the state of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation - which, in fact, is a commercial structure geared towards making profit in ANY WAYS AND DOES NOT BE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE STATE !!! Such structures are accountable, of course, only they are accountable to the US Federal Reserve and others take off the camarilla.
    Who is there that bleats about the revival of the economy? Fuck us all, while the circulatory system of the economy (cash flows, credit rates, financial policies, etc.) is controlled by the parasitic system, which is (at least) under the patronage of, in fact, Russia's enemies.
    All of their allegedly declared struggle for the survival of the economy is a woodpecker fight against inflation, i.e. withdrawing money from the country's financial system, or, in another way, bleeding the body (have you seen a healthy body that is bloodless?). Of course, I understand that some bloodletting is periodically required (even useful), but even leeches tear apart from greed. So even the most terry haters of Russia began to wonder at the actions of this body.
    Well, this, so to speak, for artistic development:
    http://goldenfront.ru/articles/view/vlastiteli-deneg-iz-bazelya
    Our Arkharovites are present there without fail
    1. guzik007
      guzik007 12 December 2015 15: 31 New
      +1
      The functions of the Central Bank, its role and special position are described in detail by Starikov in his books. Highly recommend to everyone. You, apparently, are already in the know.
  • Karavan-150
    Karavan-150 12 December 2015 10: 45 New
    +6
    The laws themselves come up, they assert themselves. But they forget to inform the citizens, however: not knowing the law,
    not exempt from liability!

    It is amazing: they say that I can not give my daughter vaccinations. This decision is up to me. And then I find out that without vaccinations in the kindergarten will not be accepted. What is it? If you want, you don’t want, but you’ll do it anyway, just as they decided!

    They wrote us a scenario of life, any deviation from the scene is not the norm ... And why should there be any norms? I'm like a Free Man.
    When will we rewrite it at the end!?!
    1. Olkass
      Olkass 12 December 2015 11: 05 New
      +3
      YOURSELF IS WHO?
      The fund’s website has a large section: “USAID in Russia”. This is now about "past merits." There we read quite openly there:
      "USAID-funded Rule of Law implementers helped draft the Russian Constitution, Part I of the Russian Civil Code, and the Russian Tax Code."
      "USAID funded the rule of law in the work of performers involved in drafting the Constitution of the Russian Federation, part I of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the Tax Code of the Russian Federation."
      Here is the source:
      https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/fact-sheets/usaid-russia

      Do you even know that all of our DECLARATIVES are still applying for draft laws to law firms controlled by Western companies. And no one hides anything. Just nobody says anything.
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 12 December 2015 12: 09 New
        +3
        Quote: Olkass
        "USAID funded the rule of law in the work of performers involved in drafting the Constitution of the Russian Federation, part I of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the Tax Code of the Russian Federation."

        Upon joining the CE, Russia undertook:

        ratify the ECHR and its main protocols (implemented);
        ratify Protocol No. 6 on the abolition of the death penalty in peacetime (not implemented);
        ratify the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture, the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, the European Charter of Local Self-Government (implemented), the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages ​​(only signed), study the ratification of the European Social Charter (implemented);
        ratify the conventions on extradition, mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, on the laundering of criminal proceeds, on the transfer of convicted persons (completed);
        ratify the CE General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities (implemented);
        resolve international disputes exclusively by peaceful means;
        Settle outstanding border issues on the basis of international law (there remains a problem with the border treaty with Estonia);
        withdraw troops from Moldova (the Russian authorities believe that the full implementation of this obligation will depend on the course of negotiations on Transnistria, now there is a small contingent there - several hundred people);
        Fulfill obligations under the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE);
        refuse to distinguish among foreign countries a zone of special influence under the name “Near Abroad”;
        to resolve the problem of the return of cultural property to other European countries;
        return property of religious organizations without delay;
        quickly resolve all problems associated with the property of other states, especially with foreign archives exported to the USSR in 1945;
        remove restrictions on foreign travel of persons holding state secrets;
        ensure that the application of the CIS Convention on Human Rights does not affect the application of the European Convention on Human Rights (for 2010, the CIS Convention entered into force, but the commission that should ensure its implementation is not valid);
        bring the legislation on the FSB in line with European standards and, in particular, deprive the FSB of the right to have their own pre-trial detention facilities (the last paragraph has been completed);
        adopt a law on alternative civil service (adopted);
        reduce and possibly eliminate hazing in the Armed Forces;
        to continue legal reform in order to bring legislation into line with European standards;
        cooperate with other countries in the prevention or reduction of harm from environmental and technological disasters;
        fully cooperate with the CE in monitoring the implementation of these obligations;
        strictly observe the provisions of international humanitarian law, including with respect to armed conflicts on its territory;
        conscientiously cooperate with international humanitarian organizations and provide them with the opportunity to work in Russia.

        The bold paragraph about neighboring countries clarifies the policy of the Russian Federation somewhat
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Askin
      Askin 12 December 2015 11: 57 New
      +2
      Quote: Karavan-150
      When will we rewrite it at the end!?!

      definitely not with the current president!
  • Mera joota
    Mera joota 12 December 2015 11: 01 New
    0
    Oh, is it really toilet paper day?
  • Tektor
    Tektor 12 December 2015 11: 57 New
    -5
    These listed points just indicate that the Constitution is balanced, that life can be complex and multifaceted, and additional interpretation by the Constitutional Court in each particular case is required. Those. these articles are ambiguous because life is ambiguous.
  • tumen
    tumen 12 December 2015 11: 58 New
    0
    But explain to me how the annexation of Crimea refers to the constitution today.
  • Gardamir
    Gardamir 12 December 2015 12: 32 New
    +2
    Should the constitution be changed? Let's try to comply first. Here is an example, someone will say nonsense. secondary, but if you can violate this means you can not observe everything else. So chapter 6, article 110 paragraph 2
    . The Government of the Russian Federation consists of the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation, Deputy Prime Ministers of the Russian Federation and federal ministers.
    where do you see in the constitution the word prime minister, deputy prime minister and other nerus? But the constitution is violated not only by magazine readers. but also those who should be the guarantor of the constitution.
  • 35lisment35
    35lisment35 12 December 2015 13: 06 New
    +2
    Chapters 9,15 are not mentioned, the author of the article carefully diverted public attention, there is legal sabotage ... it's time to change the AMERICAN constitution
  • S_last
    S_last 12 December 2015 13: 24 New
    0
    The Russian Constitution provides for the country's steady development, Federation Council Chairman Valentina Matvienko said in an interview with the Russian News Service.

    “On December 12, we can and should congratulate each other on the fact that we have such a balanced and wise Constitution, which in spite of any objective, subjective problems that arise, these or those currents, nevertheless ensures a steady progressive development of the country,” said Matvienko.

    According to the speaker of the Federation Council, the document proved that the need for a radical change will not arise
    “And, in my opinion, it will not arise in the foreseeable future either. The Constitution today reliably provides stable sustainable development of the country, the rights and freedoms of citizens, our national interests on the world stage, and the Russian state and society over the years have never encountered problems, situations that could not be resolved within the framework of the current Constitution, within of our basic law of the country, ”Matvienko stressed
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 12 December 2015 19: 41 New
      +4
      Matvienko's worldview, not burdened by intellect (in his youth, "Valka-glass"), of course, is the ultimate truth!
      1. S_last
        S_last 13 December 2015 17: 57 New
        +1
        Of course not, this is the opinion of the country's leadership and she voiced it. And our attitude towards her does not change anything in this.
  • berkut9737
    berkut9737 12 December 2015 13: 35 New
    +6
    I have never seen a constitution respected, or at least read. At best, it gathers dust on the stands of bureaucratic corridors. This applies not only to officials but also to medical institutions, utilities and in general all the organizations that I have ever encountered. Here is yesterday’s example. I get a job. The manager offers to fill out a questionnaire in which you need to lay out literally all the information about yourself, up to the passport data, and there’s no question of hiring. I refuse. I remind you that this is illegal. I give an example of article 23 of the constitution, the law on the protection of personal data, article 90 of the labor code. The manager’s eyes have 5 kopecks each, he says: we have such an order in our company. The day before yesterday in the hospital. Drive in another city. I come to the hospital. On hand are all documents: passport, snls, medical pole. They refuse to write to the doctor because of that. that I am not assigned to this hospital and the insurance pole is not local. I remind you that there is a law on the protection of citizens of the Russian Federation (in particular, paragraph 11). I require a head physician to file a complaint. I warn you that I’ll go to the prosecutor’s office, to the Minister of Health of the city, to the Commissioner for Human Rights. Oh miracle! I get an appointment with a doctor right away. I go through all the procedures without waiting in line. This hospital is now assigned forever. This is the constitutional system in the country.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 12 December 2015 15: 54 New
      +2
      Quote: berkut9737
      medical pole

      Pole - North, South. Medical - POLIS! hi
      1. berkut9737
        berkut9737 12 December 2015 16: 36 New
        +1
        Pole - North, South. Medical - POLIS! hi

        Thanks, Ctrl + Enter pressed. smile
        1. Bayonet
          Bayonet 12 December 2015 17: 13 New
          0
          Quote: berkut9737
          Thanks, Ctrl + Enter pressed.

          You are welcome! hi
          1. berkut9737
            berkut9737 12 December 2015 17: 44 New
            0
            You are welcome! hi

            Although, if there is a North Pole, then, probably, somewhere there is a Medical Pole. Maybe they haven’t opened it yet? smile
  • Starik72
    Starik72 12 December 2015 13: 47 New
    0
    Each basic law has provisions and derogations, as one sage said, which are executed much faster than the basic law.
  • Bolhevik
    Bolhevik 12 December 2015 13: 55 New
    0
    Why change there? We must take a sample of 1977. Change the USSR to the Russian Federation and the year of adoption 2016.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Logos
    Logos 12 December 2015 15: 06 New
    -1
    If you follow the logic of the author, you will have to prohibit a lot of things and the Law from this list will be inflated to an incredible scale. It is much easier to go from the opposite then - immediately the first point to ban everything, everything at all without announcing the specifics, and then specifically paint a small list of allowed
    Example - any rallies and gatherings of citizens of more than 3 people are prohibited for any reason, except:
    - cases of expressing support to the national leader and the rate declared by the state
    - Celebrations of public holidays and observances

    So it’s much easier to announce what’s allowed than to write down what’s forbidden for a long time
  • ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 12 December 2015 15: 17 New
    -1
    At least some kind of Constitution is better than none at all ...
    1. Olkass
      Olkass 12 December 2015 15: 36 New
      +3
      Is any sex better than none? belay
      Oops, generations "NEXT", "OK Google" and the victims of the Unified State Exam entered the discussion!
      Well, come on, light the thread !!!
      Edith Piech from go to ... distinguish?
  • Olkass
    Olkass 12 December 2015 15: 25 New
    0
    Quote: sa-ag

    Upon joining the CE, Russia undertook:

    So, in parallel, everything was done at the same time, a little earlier, a little later. And the year of "plunging" into the Council of Europe and the constitution. The same anal-oral hyoid dandruff, which now lives in Londonogandons and is spent on the earned silver coins.
    Only God is not a fraer, he does not forgive.
  • Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 12 December 2015 16: 30 New
    +2
    This constitution was written under the dictation of the United States and in their own interests.
    Of course, it must be rewritten.
  • hartlend
    hartlend 12 December 2015 17: 23 New
    +1
    Quote: Pvi1206
    This constitution was written under the dictation of the United States and in their own interests.
    Of course, it must be rewritten.

    I completely agree. They wrote comrades from the State Department as it was convenient for them. So this is not our constitution. This is the second. First, think what the word means. Sergey Danilov explains. Is there a constitution in Britain? Who will say?
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 12 December 2015 19: 50 New
      +1
      Quote: hartlend
      Is there a constitution in Britain?

      By and large, I do not care deeply about Britain. I need order in my state, starting with the Constitution, written not by foreign uncles, but meeting my requirements!
  • Teplohod
    Teplohod 12 December 2015 18: 17 New
    +1
    The problem is not the law, the problem is the applicators.
    1. Erg
      Erg 12 December 2015 22: 21 New
      0
      The problem is the power of power. Anarchy is deadly to any country with any constitution.
  • Alex Xorkam
    Alex Xorkam 12 December 2015 18: 31 New
    +2
    Before you "scold" the Constitution, you must learn to implement it. We and no one else elect representative bodies that adopt laws that are not consistent with the Constitution. And such a situation around. The Constitution may not be perfect, but it basically solves most of the problems correctly.
    1. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 12 December 2015 18: 44 New
      +2
      Quote: Alex Xorkam
      Before “scolding” the Constitution, one must learn to implement it

      Gold words.... hi
      Today in Russia there is a phenomenon of "legal indifference" - well, almost everyone demands the fulfillment of everything and everything from everyone and everything. Oneself, dear, to force to follow not so much the spirit of the Constitution, but banally simple human rules and norms, the task is almost impossible.
      I'll put it simply. Everyone has become "legally literate" - they know the responsibilities of everyone, they know their rights. But they somehow strangely forget about their duties.
  • berkut9737
    berkut9737 12 December 2015 18: 35 New
    0
    Teplohod
    The problem is not the law, the problem is the applicators.

    Judging by my own experience. The problem is that those who are obliged to watch the observance of the constitutional rights of citizens (prosecutors) are limited by law. Who introduced these laws? Probably the one who benefits from this. The prosecutor’s office is inactive, not because it is not able to restore order, but because there is a law restricting its activities. Under her protection are only social. unprotected sections of society, and the remaining layers themselves must assert their rights by running through lawyers, lawyers, and courts. Who has time for this? No one. Everyone works from morning till night to somehow feed their families.
    1. Sultan Babai
      Sultan Babai 12 December 2015 19: 41 New
      0
      I'm a lawyer. And I can say that I also do not have time, but I defend my rights. My uncle in Germany also says that they have bureaucracy there and their rights must also be defended, so gentlemen, read the laws. My friends read and assert their rights (although not lawyers) (they don’t touch me not because I won’t help them, they just want to figure it out themselves)