Military Review

Media: the loss of the Iranian contingent in Syria increased significantly

58
Since 2013, Iran has sent more than 2 thousand troops and members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps to Syria to fight against terrorists, while the loss of Iranians has significantly increased since the beginning of the Russian operation, according to the French newsletter TTU, an article from the blog bmpd.


Media: the loss of the Iranian contingent in Syria increased significantly
IRGC officers in Syria.

"The average death toll, which was 10 people per month, has tripled since October, reaching 67 deaths in October-November," writes the publication with reference to the Iranian news agency IRNA.

According to TTU, the Iranian authorities are not trying to hide the losses, rather the opposite.

“In order to increase the degree of resistance in the Shiite community at the expense of the theme of the martyrs, the Iranian regime reported the funeral of one of the members of the Basij Kadir Sarlak corps who died in battle, as well as the IRGC general Hossein Hamedani. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei even published a photo in his twitter in which he communicates with the relatives of the deceased ”- notes the publication.

"This communication company aims to find a consensus among the Iranian population on the issue of the attitude to the" Islamic State "and the preparation of more extensive military participation in the conflict over the coming months," the newsletter believes.
Photos used:
Facebook via syria4rev.blogspot.ru
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. cniza
    cniza 10 December 2015 12: 57 New
    13
    “This communication company aims to find consensus among the Iranian population on the issue of attitudes to the Islamic State and the preparation of a wider military participation in the conflict over the coming months,” the bulletin said.


    They know better what to do, probably the right approach.
    1. Teberii
      Teberii 10 December 2015 13: 28 New
      13
      People are fighting, not only soldiers but also generals are dying, they are fighting for their future, so losses are inevitable.
      1. maxiban
        maxiban 10 December 2015 13: 32 New
        +7
        During the onset, losses are greater than during the period of defensive actions.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 10 December 2015 12: 58 New
    -49
    Now with our “support”, the Americans with the coalition and the Iranians will be smashed in Syria. Then they will take up Iran itself.
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 10 December 2015 13: 37 New
      16
      DIVAN SOLDIER (2)
      Now with our “support”, the Americans with the coalition and the Iranians will be smashed in Syria. Then they will take up Iran itself.

      And what do you offer DIVAN SOLDIER (2), you are our treacherous pessimist? Remaining Iranians in colonial slavery among Turks, Saudis, Qataris and Americans is under the knives of a pack of zombie bandits and ISIS killers ?! Do not fight the Iranians ahead of the curve to protect their homeland on the approaches to Iran from a common enemy?
      What do you think the Iranians are doing wrong in Syria?
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 10 December 2015 13: 47 New
        -10
        They are doing everything right, just the Western coalition is behind the igil, and there is no one to stand up for Iran.
        1. Diana Ilyina
          Diana Ilyina 10 December 2015 13: 54 New
          14
          Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
          it’s just that the western coalition stands for igil, and there is no one to stand up for Iran.


          Don’t worry, Iran can stand up for itself, they have already proved it! And if not, then Russia will help, we, unlike America, do not abandon our allies!
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Tatyana
            Tatyana 10 December 2015 14: 33 New
            +2
            DIVAN SOLDIER (2)
            They are doing everything right, just the Western coalition is behind the igil, and there is no one to stand up for Iran.

            Russia and Iranians are fighting together in Syria! And what will happen next will be seen. Do not run ahead of time in your subjectively pessimistic forecasts. The critical risks in a war are clear to everyone. You just need to fight in such a way that the possible losing risks in the war are eliminated in advance. At the same time, the Iranians themselves are now fighting in Syria against a common enemy precisely in order to avoid these losing risks in the war against their homeland - against Iran. In Syria, the Iranians are fighting in advance for their homeland. By the way, the Russians in Syria are fighting precisely for their homeland - Russia, too.
            1. Bluesman
              Bluesman 10 December 2015 15: 23 New
              -2
              Quote: Tatiana
              You just need to fight in such a way that the possible losing risks in the war are eliminated in advance.

              mighty thought. Are there any “winning risks”?
            2. Dryuya2
              Dryuya2 10 December 2015 16: 41 New
              +4
              Diana love and Tatyana love - the sofa soldier was "beaten"
              so his "girls" so laughing good
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. pilot8878
          pilot8878 10 December 2015 15: 12 New
          +1

          Russians do not abandon their (allies) in a war!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Sergey S.
      Sergey S. 10 December 2015 22: 25 New
      0
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      Now with our “support”, the Americans with the coalition and the Iranians will be smashed in Syria. Then they will take up Iran itself.

      Why so viciously ...
      While the situation is the opposite.

      And, most importantly, war. like a filter, the whole society passes through itself.
      So then, when peace comes, the front-line soldiers asked from the rear ...
      ... and those who wrote panic or enemy posts will not seem enough ...
    4. tajik-airya.
      tajik-airya. 10 December 2015 22: 26 New
      -1
      are you stupid Iran compared with Syria? In your opinion, will the Americans with the suicide coalition begin to fight the country with the largest army in the world + a nuclear (possibly dirty bomb) otvetka? made fun of
  3. Riperbahn
    Riperbahn 10 December 2015 12: 59 New
    32
    The kingdom of heaven, perished in battle with our common enemy. Rest in peace...
  4. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 10 December 2015 12: 59 New
    +7
    It would not hurt to understand the causes of such losses, and not just to state them!
    1. A-Sim
      A-Sim 10 December 2015 13: 06 New
      +5
      Ground offensive operation, probably ...
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 10 December 2015 13: 08 New
      16
      Little power. Therefore, the loss. The cadres are not very, especially the officers, in southern Aleppo, the deceased Iranian general was forced to raise the Syrians to attack.

      Here is a living example. Fresh forces were needed, urgently to strengthen the attacking groups. Ours in Makhin, where there seemed to be a lull of the last week. The day before yesterday, units of 120 army brigades and a combined battalion of Shiite volunteers from Iraq were withdrawn from Makhin (a strategically important city). The city remained guarded by the NDF (militia). At night, the Baha'is attacked the city with sudden strikes and, according to the Baboons, they took out the militia - battles take place in the city center and in separate quarters according to the Syrian official version. Now they are hastily gathering forces to Makhin from everywhere to recapture the city.
    3. Cap-3 USSR
      Cap-3 USSR 10 December 2015 13: 13 New
      10
      Why understand, any sane person understands that before our arrival there were conducted positional and defensive battles, and now they are offensive. Naturally, losses will increase.
      In addition, 10 people are AVERAGE, and 67 in two months, and even offensive.
    4. Sergey S.
      Sergey S. 10 December 2015 22: 28 New
      0
      Quote: dchegrinec
      It would not hurt to understand the causes of such losses, and not just to state them!

      Have you considered destroyed enemies?
  5. Evil 55
    Evil 55 10 December 2015 13: 01 New
    +8
    Adequate Islamic Iran is already better than the Ottoman-Muslim Syndicate of Turo ISIS ...
  6. knn54
    knn54 10 December 2015 13: 03 New
    10
    Where KSIR still gain experience. And the fact that they do not hide, well done. And after all, there is nowhere to retreat behind Tehran.
    1. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 10 December 2015 13: 54 New
      +3
      Quote: knn54
      Where KSIR still gain experience. And the fact that they do not hide, well done. And after all, there is nowhere to retreat behind Tehran.

      Everyone always hides losses at home and exaggerates from the enemy, this has a beneficial effect on the morale of the soldiers and civilians, it is simply not always possible to hide and belittle not to any level believable.
  7. starchina pv
    starchina pv 10 December 2015 13: 05 New
    0
    Is Iranian aviation there or not to support its own?
  8. Decathlon
    Decathlon 10 December 2015 13: 06 New
    +8
    "... since the beginning of the Russian operation, the loss of Iranians has grown significantly, according to the French TTU bulletin ..."
    Has anyone caught any connection between events ?! Or is it just a “spit on duty” in our direction ?!
    1. Scoun
      Scoun 10 December 2015 13: 12 New
      +5
      Quote: Decathlon
      Has anyone caught any connection between events ?! Or is it just a “spit on duty” in our direction ?!

      Quote: A-Sim
      Ground offensive operation, probably ...

      Quote: Gunpowder
      Perhaps participation in offensive operations leads to an increase in these losses.
      The offensive is a serious matter, and they are advancing with the Syrian troops.

      Here recently the video was laid out and on it it was the Iranians who liberated the small town, hence the increased number of losses, before they simply helped to defend themselves.
    2. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 10 December 2015 13: 14 New
      +5
      Of course, spitting through the lip and from the back. It would be possible to interpret as if not for the Russian attacks, then the Iranians did not have to go on the offensive, and therefore bear losses. Friendly analysis of the so-called "ally" (France).
    3. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 10 December 2015 13: 56 New
      +1
      Quote: Decathlon
      "... since the beginning of the Russian operation, the loss of Iranians has grown significantly, according to the French TTU bulletin ..."
      Has anyone caught any connection between events ?! Or is it just a “spit on duty” in our direction ?!

      What do we have to do with it, our task is air and large goals, the land part is the Muslim share, we will not pull on ourselves
    4. NordUral
      NordUral 10 December 2015 14: 14 New
      +2
      Naturally, that spit. It will be true that with the beginning of the American coalition.
    5. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 10 December 2015 17: 34 New
      +2
      This is how to interpret ... You can, like a spit ...
      Or you can just say ... Since the beginning of the work of the Russian Air Force, the troops went on the offensive. And in the offensive there are always more losses than in positional battles.
  9. Powder
    Powder 10 December 2015 13: 07 New
    +4
    Quote: dchegrinec
    It would not hurt to understand the causes of such losses, and not just to state them!


    Perhaps participation in offensive operations leads to an increase in these losses.
    The offensive is a serious matter, and they are advancing with the Syrian troops.
    Best regards
  10. 31rus
    31rus 10 December 2015 13: 13 New
    +2
    This has been said more than once, the ground part of the war is the most cruel and unfortunately can’t do without losses, and the increase in the number of losses suggests that Iran is not standing aside, but is really fighting, in the most difficult sectors and again I ask the same question why we do not arm Russia with modern weapons, neither the Syrians nor the Iranians, what is the agreement with Israel behind this?
    1. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 10 December 2015 13: 58 New
      0
      Quote: 31rus
      This has been said more than once, the ground part of the war is the most cruel and unfortunately can’t do without losses, and the increase in the number of losses suggests that Iran is not standing aside, but is really fighting, in the most difficult sectors and again I ask the same question why we do not arm Russia with modern weapons, neither the Syrians nor the Iranians, what is the agreement with Israel behind this?

      Because they don’t have endless money and apparently we won’t spend more than agreed, Syria is important for us, of course, but for Syrians and Iranians it is more important
  11. Petrik66
    Petrik66 10 December 2015 13: 15 New
    14
    Iran is exactly the same temporary travel companion as Turkey. What difference does it make to us - Shiites or Sunites? Both Turkey and Iran are two major powers with their interests and their understanding of the realities. So we glorify Erdogan on the same site (they say what a fellow - he put on American instructions and we will punish the EU with him and “the Turkish stream2 spite the EU will muddle.) After these jackals, led by the same Erdogan, killed two of us, Erdogan smoothly turned into a small father, and what? It wasn’t noticeable before7 Or Turkish special forces did not roam around Chechnya7 And whose intelligence group was then captured by the great Lebed (his eternal memory), and where did the remaining “shaitans” get shelter and home after they all And the fact that the Turks supply ISIS and other bastards, we just found out?
    For example, Irna actively supported the Afghans when we carried out “international duty” there, set up camps, etc. And Iranian intelligence was one of those who provoked Sumgayit and Baku. It’s just that we have fewer and fewer “partners”, China is “forever brother”, India is running to the States, the list is small. So we communicate, take off. Now, they are our fellow travelers, we would not surrender them, it would be good if they didn’t surrender us like Serbs, Turks, Egyptians, etc. Soon the "brotherly" Chavesswell will join them. Our "partners" would like to say: Friends do not have to have friends with them. But Russia again has only two allies - the army and navy.
    1. ism_ek
      ism_ek 10 December 2015 14: 46 New
      +3
      The confrontation between the Turkish Sultan and the Persian Shah lasts for many centuries. And throughout this time, starting from the time of Ivan III, Russia successfully used this.

      During the Soviet presence in Afghanistan, the Iranian border was one of the most peaceful places. Provocations in Baku and Sumgait are also fictitious. Independent Azerbaijan is not beneficial to Iran, because they have their own inner Azerbaijan, which is striving for secession.
    2. igorka357
      igorka357 10 December 2015 16: 24 New
      +1
      He said everything correctly ... it would be possible to set Cuba as an example for you, but even after Fidel’s death, it began to decompose slowly, and the embassy was opened there ... the trouble was direct with the Russians with the allies .. that's right, the army is a fleet and a Russian officer with a soldier , here are the allies of our country, the rest are so .. for the time being !!!
  12. Yak-3P
    Yak-3P 10 December 2015 13: 17 New
    0
    we have comparable losses per day in the City .. even less ... 95 .. and there is Olenism in the East and a lot of it .. and there are losses .. of courage to them and that Russian hopelessness that helped us
  13. Foxbed
    Foxbed 10 December 2015 13: 22 New
    0
    C: Media: losses of Iranian contingent in Syria increased significantly

    This is war.
  14. Egor69
    Egor69 10 December 2015 13: 24 New
    +4
    Everything is known in comparison. (To understand the general picture, you need to know the losses from the Syrian forces and ISIS (If the loss of Iranians is 67 people, and ISIS 1000, then mathematics is even nothing. Provided that in an offensive battle losses are laid as 3: 1 for attackers.
    1. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 10 December 2015 14: 01 New
      +1
      Quote: Egor69
      Everything is known in comparison. (To understand the general picture, you need to know the losses from the Syrian forces and ISIS (If the loss of Iranians is 67 people, and ISIS 1000, then mathematics is even nothing. Provided that in an offensive battle losses are laid as 3: 1 for attackers.

      3: 1 is for storming trenches on foot, for a long time no one has planned, you will not save people
  15. Gunther
    Gunther 10 December 2015 13: 28 New
    -2
    DIVAN SOLDIER (2) Quote:
    Now with our “support”, the Americans with the coalition and the Iranians will be smashed in Syria. Then they will take up Iran itself.

    Explain the course of your thought, how before that the mighty coalition of the Forces of Light, led by the Black sovereign, groaned for more than a year and blundered with the Yoke (not to mention Iran), and after the growth of the combat potential of Syria (Russian Air Force and Iranian Armed Forces) it suddenly "blows".
    Or do you mean "blow" in the sense of "carry")))
    Yankels of course)
  16. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 10 December 2015 13: 30 New
    0
    “This communication company aims to find consensus among the Iranian population on the issue of attitudes to the Islamic State and the preparation of a wider military participation in the conflict over the coming months,” the bulletin said.


    An interesting point of view. It is difficult to judge how true it is, since of course there is little information, but it is also impossible to reject a completely similar version on the move.
    Let's wait for the further development of events. The military is humanly sorry. soldier
  17. Wolka
    Wolka 10 December 2015 13: 36 New
    +2
    it seems like a stuffing from the media, I didn’t see the main thing, regarding what criterion is the assessment of combat losses, and therefore the usual journal for people ...
  18. Rostislav
    Rostislav 10 December 2015 13: 39 New
    +1
    It would not hurt to understand the causes of such losses, and not just to state them!

    The intensity of the fighting increased, primarily offensive battles to liberate the territories. Losses in offensive combat are always higher than in defense, the ratio is 3: 1. Defended - there was one indicator. Let's go ahead - the situation has changed.
  19. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 10 December 2015 13: 45 New
    +4
    Dumb article!
    And what's the problem ???
    If previously the databases were defensive in nature, then the losses were small.
    Now the databases are offensive in nature, so there is an increase in losses in the FS.
    Just like children ... If only, something "suck from the finger"!
  20. Anisim1977
    Anisim1977 10 December 2015 13: 53 New
    0
    It is time for Iran to more actively direct its fighters to fight the iblises. In Iran, for more than 20 years of the Islamic revolution, there are at least one thousand one hundred hot goals - you just need to correctly direct and explain them - the iblises dishonor the true faith, destroy mosques and deserve to burn in hell. ... And In this style. And give the go-ahead for jihad iblises.
    They wedge a wedge, and in Iran there are no less fanatics of faith than Daesh. But we need armor for this business and small arms - that’s how we need help, because we, too, stand for true faith and respect and support the right Islam.
    1. miru mir
      miru mir 10 December 2015 18: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: Anisim1977
      and in Iran there are no less fanatics of faith than DAISH

      Absolutely right. And they are not much different.
  21. COBA
    COBA 10 December 2015 13: 56 New
    0
    It seems that Iran has "stumbled" that further on the scenario it will be its democrats and has moved on to building up its armed forces in Syria. Iran should occupy the east and north-east of Syria, and Russia (if it wants a turning point in this war) should provide Iran with diplomatic support, not to mention military-technical. There is no hope for Iraq, the Turks cannot expel from their land, things do not go beyond threats
  22. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 10 December 2015 14: 02 New
    0
    Listen, and more and more they say that they are recruiting contractors in Syria. Today the figure was announced - 500000 rubles a month. Type, those who are not particularly interested.

    It's true ? Who is in the know?
    1. supernova123
      supernova123 10 December 2015 15: 44 New
      0
      they say chickens are milked
    2. Cynic
      Cynic 11 December 2015 17: 03 New
      0
      Quote: The Cat
      Today the figure was announced - 500000 rubles a month

      Some and 2 hryvnias per day were promised.
  23. Gunther
    Gunther 10 December 2015 14: 07 New
    0
    The Cat, if interested in this topic, hammer in the search engine "PMC Wagner."
    1. Ze Kot
      Ze Kot 11 December 2015 14: 23 New
      0
      Quote: Gunter
      The Cat, if interested in this topic, hammer in the search engine "PMC Wagner."



      Thank you.
      And when were PMCs allowed?

      I asked more about the contract with the official authorities (MO).
  24. nik1321
    nik1321 10 December 2015 15: 39 New
    0
    still war
  25. Victorio
    Victorio 10 December 2015 16: 22 New
    0
    What is 2 thousand? and of them really shooting? the result of protracted battles with the liberation of small towns and villages
  26. alone
    alone 10 December 2015 19: 42 New
    0
    The Syrian blitz krieg was clearly unsuccessful. In addition to some tactical successes, no strategic breakdown of the situation took place. This war will continue for a long time.
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 10 December 2015 19: 49 New
      0
      What would you consider a strategic break (?) And the most interesting thing is this definition?
      1. alone
        alone 10 December 2015 20: 45 New
        0
        Quote: Cynic
        What would you consider a strategic break (?) And the most interesting thing is this definition?

        The strategic turning point (this will be more accurate) in the Syrian conflict is, first of all, taking Aleppo, which is the economic capital of Syria, under its full control. This has not happened yet.
        Then there is no progress on the issue of overlapping the state border. The borders are still a passage yard. As long as the border is out of control, there will be no victory.

        And the most significant is the split of the Syrian people. Until there is consolidation, the war will continue indefinitely.

        Quote: Cynic
        So they are advancing, not defending.


        Optionally. Iranians could be ambushed. A couple of three such targeted sorties can easily handle such losses, especially when any ambush begins with an explosion of a truck driving a suicide bomber who rejoices that he’ll get into Paradise
        1. Cynic
          Cynic 10 December 2015 21: 02 New
          0
          Quote: lonely
          is the economic capital

          No, there are, to be honest, no capitals. Strong points.
          And about the borders, while Turkey is for ISIS ... you won’t make a PCB.
  27. Cynic
    Cynic 10 December 2015 19: 46 New
    +1
    So they are advancing, not defending.
  28. Cook
    Cook 10 December 2015 22: 59 New
    +3
    Quote: igorka357
    He said everything correctly ... it would be possible to set Cuba as an example for you, but even after Fidel’s death, it began to decompose slowly, and the embassy was opened there ... the trouble was direct with the Russians with the allies .. that's right, the army is a fleet and a Russian officer with a soldier , here are the allies of our country, the rest are so .. for the time being !!!


    The Lord is with you, Fidel is still alive.