Military Review

Yatsenyuk said that Kiev is ready to sue Moscow for 3-billion debt

100
Prime Minister of Ukraine Yatsenyuk announced that Ukraine is ready to sue Russia if it files a claim for non-payment of a $ Billion-dollar debt by Kiev. Recall that the deadline for the payment of public debt of Ukraine - December 3. At the same time, the IMF made a decision unprecedented in its essence: to allow lending to the Ukrainian economy even in the event of a default.


RIA News quotes Yatsenyuk statement:
Our position has been and remains unchanged: we offered all international creditors to restructure. All adequate international lenders accepted the offer of Ukraine. Our offer to others who did not accept our restructuring plan remains on the table. Once again I emphasize that Russia cannot and will not receive other conditions of restructuring than those received by other creditors. Therefore, if Russia is ready to accept the terms of restructuring - please, if Russia sues Ukraine - we are ready to sue Russia, we are fully armed.


Such Napoleonic statements Yatsenyuk voiced, speaking before the ministers of his Cabinet. This happened after it became clear that the chief curator of Ukraine, Joe Biden, who visited Kiev, deigned to leave Yatsenyuk at his post, despite the fact that the deputy attorney general said that the current prime minister was involved in a corrupt scheme, depriving the country of approximately $ 90 million annually.

Yatsenyuk said that Kiev is ready to sue Moscow for 3-billion debt


It should be noted that the rating of Yatsenyuk as the head of the Ukrainian Cabinet in Ukraine itself has dropped below 2% - not more than six months beyond the statistical error limits.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. pest
    pest 10 December 2015 06: 51 New
    13
    The usual thief pretense is that I am not me and my hat is not mine.
    1. major071
      major071 10 December 2015 06: 54 New
      52
      Each time Yatsenyuk
      Publishes ever louder PUK
      It seems to be a thousand words
      Only instead of words - scumbags

      wink drinks
      1. Andrea
        Andrea 10 December 2015 07: 17 New
        10
        The rabbit received a black mark from Biden, but didn’t understand the hint. (He didn’t shake hands with the only one of them, by the way, Obama Poroshenko ignored the same)
        The EU, here urged to write off 20% of the debt. Or maybe in vain we rest, well, this is its default? Since loans still give.
        The IMF wrote off 3.5 lard, but if the Ukrainian economy will grow about 4-5% per year, then Ukraine will have to pay 30-40 billion dollars, the price of the issue is 10 times higher. This is a restructuring!
        True, when it will be, probably never. what
        1. cniza
          cniza 10 December 2015 07: 41 New
          +6
          Quote: Andrea
          The rabbit received a black mark from Biden, but didn’t understand the hint. (He didn’t shake hands with the only one of them, by the way, Obama Poroshenko ignored the same)


          To understand the hints, one must be friends with one’s head, and in Ukraine there’s a massive anomaly, the heads live separately from carcasses and not only among those in power.
          1. Voha_krim
            Voha_krim 10 December 2015 08: 21 New
            12
            Quote: cniza
            ... one must be friends with one’s head, and in Ukraine there’s a total
          2. Lukich
            Lukich 10 December 2015 08: 35 New
            28
            Quote: cniza
            To understand the hints, one must be friends with one’s head, and in Ukraine there’s a massive anomaly, the heads live separately from carcasses and not only among those in power.
            1. wow
              wow 10 December 2015 12: 26 New
              0
              In the face of eternity, the elders speak the truth ...!
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The black
        The black 10 December 2015 07: 21 New
        26
        Found similarities between Ukrainian politicians and the tank * Armata T-14 * - they have a common uninhabited * tower * :) laughing
        1. Andrea
          Andrea 10 December 2015 07: 47 New
          0
          Quote: Black

          Found similarities between Ukrainian politicians and the tank * Armata T-14 * - they have a common uninhabited * tower * :)
          Bravo! Applause ... turning into a standing ovation. good
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. The black
      The black 10 December 2015 07: 25 New
      15
      As Bismarck said,
      “Russians always come for their money. And when they come - do not rely on the Jesuit agreements that you have signed, supposedly justifying you. They are not worth the paper on which they are written. Therefore, it’s worth playing with the Russians honestly or not at all. ”
      1. sisa29
        sisa29 10 December 2015 08: 39 New
        +7
        In vain did you quote Bismarck, it was said about that Russia, which the whole world respected.
        I think there is a good argument for the numbers:
        For 11 years, Russia has forgiven foreign debts of $ 80 billion, but it itself has paid creditors $ 124 billion:
        So what were you talking about coming for your money?
        1. sisa29
          sisa29 10 December 2015 10: 28 New
          +1
          It is interesting to put a minus to hear an opinion on the issue
      2. sisa29
        sisa29 10 December 2015 09: 08 New
        +4
        It’s interesting that you’ve been instructed with a bunch of pluses for a beautiful patriotic phrase. And not even one person did not want to think about the meaning and compare it with reality. Patriotism is a good thing, but why no one wants to think.
        Here we condemn Ukraine, and after all the patriotic slogans “Glory to Ukraine” began there, “Russia is to blame for everything” and that’s all, the people were seduced by the slogans but didn’t want to think. and not one doubted it. Read everything on the site screaming what Ukrainians are stupid, crooks, but at least someone wondered why we pulled out 3 billion from our economy and lost them ineptly.
        1. Shveps
          Shveps 10 December 2015 11: 19 New
          +2
          Quote: sisa29
          why we snatched out a billion billion from our economy and lost them


          FROM POSTIN'S MESSAGE FED.SOBR. 04.12.2014:
          It is well known that Russia not only supported Ukraine and other fraternal republics of the former USSR in their quest for sovereignty, but also greatly contributed to this process at the turn of the 1990's.
          Since then, nothing has changed in our position.
          Russia is making, has already made a huge contribution to supporting Ukraine.
          Here I will say it again, our banks have already invested about 25 billion dollars in Ukraine. The Ministry of Finance of Russia issued a loan last year - another three billion. Gazprom credited Ukraine’s economy with 5,5 - even with a discount that no one promised, 4,5 of a billion dollars. Calculate how much it will all be together. This is 32,5 - 33,5 billion dollars just lately.
          1. sisa29
            sisa29 10 December 2015 12: 45 New
            +1
            I have a feeling that we are constantly paying off in the hope that we will be loved or respected. Alas, they respect only the strong, weak; trying to pay off, they only have and taunt.
    3. atalef
      atalef 10 December 2015 08: 10 New
      +6
      Quote: pest
      The usual thief pretense is that I am not me and my hat is not mine.

      The first question is which court will be sued?
      I understand in international arbitration (and the willingness to sue Ukraine and Russia - as I understand it - recognition of the legitimacy of the court)
      Second question . what to do with Ukraine. if losing the process. will she refuse the legitimacy of the court and refuse to pay?
      1. Douel
        Douel 10 December 2015 08: 34 New
        +5
        In any case, international arbitration. And if the court takes the side of Ukraine, then this will be the second big "gift" to us, which will show that the time of agreements and world law has passed. There is only one right left - the right of the strong.
        And the likelihood of such an outcome is quite high. If the Americans chose to knock out the first of the fundamental pillars of the rules, then why should they stop at the second?
        1. atalef
          atalef 10 December 2015 08: 39 New
          +2
          Quote: Douel
          In any case, international arbitration. And if the court takes the side of Ukraine, then this will be the second big "gift" to us, which will show that the time of agreements and world law has passed.

          Recall arbitration in the Yukos case?
          It is interesting how Russia appeal to this court, if not more than 7-8 months ago it denied him legitimacy?
      2. Phantom Revolution
        Phantom Revolution 10 December 2015 08: 35 New
        0
        Quote: atalef
        Second question . what to do with Ukraine. if losing the process. will she refuse the legitimacy of the court and refuse to pay?

        Most likely they will try to default, then it is possible to confiscate the property of some individuals in the Russian Federation.
        1. atalef
          atalef 10 December 2015 08: 44 New
          0
          Quote: Phantom Revolution
          Quote: atalef
          Second question . what to do with Ukraine. if losing the process. will she refuse the legitimacy of the court and refuse to pay?

          Most likely they will try to default, then it is possible to confiscate the property of some individuals in the Russian Federation.

          and what, then, do the Yukos shareholders?
          Vilka, as the Georgian brothers say.
          arbitration alone and how to say find 5 differences in the case
          Russia - Yukos shareholders
          Russia is the debt of Ukraine.
          Well, who can?
      3. evil partisan
        evil partisan 10 December 2015 08: 50 New
        0
        Quote: atalef
        Second question . what to do with Ukraine. if losing the process. will she refuse the legitimacy of the court and refuse to pay?

        sad
        So you threw this little idea to them, or what? am
        Hi! drinks
        1. atalef
          atalef 10 December 2015 10: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: wicked partisan
          So you threw this little idea to them, or what? Hello!

          Hello !
          No, the question itself arose on the basis of a well-known applicant.
    4. War and Peace
      War and Peace 10 December 2015 09: 28 New
      0
      Ukrainians began to steal gas even when Yushchenko, so how much can you support them? now gas, then loans, now Putin decided to throw them coal again, and they just shit at Russia, all sorts of sanctions are dishonest and unscrupulous, deceitful and malicious, other people's creatures and talking with them should be short - NO SUPPORT to the economy of banderland, why Putin doesn't understand this?
    5. Vend
      Vend 10 December 2015 09: 40 New
      0
      Quote: pest
      The usual thief pretense is that I am not me and my hat is not mine.

      I think he still relies on his masters. He does not understand that as soon as the trial begins, they will throw Ukraine as unnecessary garbage.
      1. sisa29
        sisa29 10 December 2015 09: 53 New
        0
        Reason why the court will make a decision in favor of Russia. So once again we will feed the lawyers. And therefore, why on earth would the gentlemen throw Ukraine? Ukraine is on the right track of US policy. No, they will not throw Ukraine very much out of its zealous serf.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 10 December 2015 11: 15 New
          +3
          Quote: sisa29
          No, they will not throw Ukraine very much out of its zealous serf.

          And yet they will throw)))
          Having chosen more or less valuable assets from this territory, they will throw it as an unnecessary toy.
          Do you think Biden accidentally proposed the creation of the "United States of Ukraine"? ... No respected. They are preparing to tear it apart like a Christmas turkey. What for?
          They understand that it is expensive for them to maintain all of Ukraine and are ready to give up part of its territory, having previously made this part unviable and hanging it on Russia.
          Yes, they will not advance NATO to our borders by expanding their presence in Ukraine, but they will create the conditions for this to happen by entering a number of Ukrainian territories into countries already part of NATO such as Poland and Romania, thereby simply bringing their natural border closer to Russia. At the same time, they will take part of the Ukrainian gas transportation system and oil pipeline with entry points to Europe. So Biden did not make a reservation, but voiced the general position of the United States at the beginning of the division of Ukraine. The USA, EU and IMF refused to guarantee the solvency of their “sucker”, as part of the restructuring of the Ukrainian debt proposed by Russia - the USA.
          1. sisa29
            sisa29 10 December 2015 16: 04 New
            +1
            I absolutely agree with you that in the long run they will certainly be thrown. In my comment, I meant a little something wrong:
            as soon as the trial begins, they will throw Ukraine
            that is, I meant that the court’s decision, even if there is a miracle and we judge our own, will not affect Ukraine’s relations with the gentlemen in any way because ... you can read your comment further
        2. Vend
          Vend 10 December 2015 11: 16 New
          +1
          Quote: sisa29
          Reason why the court will make a decision in favor of Russia. So once again we will feed the lawyers. And therefore, why on earth would the gentlemen throw Ukraine? Ukraine is on the right track of US policy. No, they will not throw Ukraine very much out of its zealous serf.

          IMF recognized debt sovereign. Maybe a zealous, but stupid and thieving serf. Nobody needs this laughing
          1. sisa29
            sisa29 10 December 2015 16: 10 New
            0
            Not until this stupid slave shits under the door to a neighbor they will give him a piece of bread so as not to die completely. And how he borrowed from a naive neighbor and spat in response to the owner simply amused.
  2. avvg
    avvg 10 December 2015 06: 52 New
    +4
    Perhaps Yatsenyuk thinks that Kiev is ready for war with Russia and is ready to declare war on Russia.
    1. pvv113
      pvv113 10 December 2015 07: 07 New
      11
      Most likely, he thinks that he has stolen enough for himself to fall down at the cordon at any moment. Therefore, all his speeches on the account of duty - this is a game of public hi
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. bocsman
        bocsman 10 December 2015 07: 35 New
        +1
        Quote: pvv113
        Most likely, he thinks that he has stolen enough for himself to fall down at the cordon at any moment. Therefore, all his speeches on the account of duty - this is a game of public hi

        Vali did not go beyond the hill and a scarf for the Senya - Pisya already tied!
    2. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 10 December 2015 07: 07 New
      +2
      Quote: avvg
      Perhaps Yatsenyuk thinks that Kiev is ready for war with Russia and is ready to declare war on Russia.

      Yatsenyuk said that Kiev is ready to sue Moscow for 3-billion debt
      After Biden’s visit, he would have survived before the war and before the trial. That's what he should think about. At least not to court with Russia, but to hold on to his own ... But their jumpers will be crushed in the corner, like a bug ...
  3. inkass_98
    inkass_98 10 December 2015 06: 53 New
    +5
    As they said in one old joke about the same reason: "To fight - so to fight, why yell at .opu?"
  4. Igor39
    Igor39 10 December 2015 06: 55 New
    +2
    If the IMF does not confirm the sovereignty of debt, it is difficult to say about the chances of success.
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 10 December 2015 07: 08 New
      20
      Quote: Igor39
      If the IMF does not confirm the sovereignty of debt, it is difficult to say about the chances of success.


      ours deliberately set an additional precedent ... if the court also takes the side of Ukraine then many countries with loans from the USA and the EU will get a blank check ... remember Brazil and Argentina included in the Brix ... then the IMF institution will be completely destroyed and at the forefront BRICS Bank will be released. confused but something like this ...
      1. Igor39
        Igor39 10 December 2015 07: 18 New
        0
        We gave Ukraine 3 lard by purchasing Eurobonds, and the IMF lends to Brazil and Argentina, and is unlikely to allow it to evade debt, any law will be on the side of the IMF, this is the organization of the Yankees, and here the debate is about what kind of debt Ukraine has from us, private or sovereign, all creditors agreed to write off 20% of the debt and installment payment, but we will not, unless the IMF confirms the sovereignty of the debt (evade and wag this), it will be difficult for the court to get the money back.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 10 December 2015 07: 35 New
          0
          Quote: Igor39
          it will be difficult for the court to get the money back.

          In fact, in court there is no difference for a debt repayment.
        2. Awaz
          Awaz 10 December 2015 08: 16 New
          +2
          it was the authorities of the two countries who agreed on the purchase and sale of Eurobonds through English jurisdiction ... If the English court does not bend, then there should be no problems. It’s not like if Russia gave Yanek money to buy for example Russian gas from Gazprom or something else, namely the purchase of securities.
          The EU is not casual in asking Russia to make concessions. Of course there they have the resources to somehow level the legal validity of the Russian claims, but I think that they are unlikely to do so. Although the IMF’s behavior is certainly indicative of a lenient office, they cannot influence it at this moment.
          In fact, Russia also has debts and I think that they are more than Ukrainian and smart rulers should play this and drive the European "partners" under the baseboard.
        3. Doktor-2
          Doktor-2 10 December 2015 08: 31 New
          +1
          Ka, I understand - not all! And PRIVATE lenders agreed to this restructuring, this is the question i.e. if we agree to these conditions, then we officially recognize the debt as PRIVATE with all the consequences
      2. cniza
        cniza 10 December 2015 07: 47 New
        +3
        Plus corporate debt, and also Greece will be very "fun."
      3. atalef
        atalef 10 December 2015 08: 22 New
        +1
        Quote: vorobey
        ours intentionally set an additional precedent ..

        Sasha, hello !!
        The precedent has already been created by Russia. after losing the court to Yukos and after losing, she refused the court legitimacy and refused to pay
        Quote: vorobey
        if the court also takes the side of Ukraine, then many countries with loans from the USA and the EU will receive a blank check

        Not . there are no blanche cards. The IMF itself decides who to lend. and who is not.
        The question is, exemplarily, do you have a client. who does not want to pay someone debt. Does it bother you to give him money on credit?

        Quote: vorobey
        remember Brazil and Argentina included in the Brix ... then the IMF Institute will be completely destroyed and the BRICS Bank will come to the forefront

        But is he? BRICS Bank? And who is stopping him from taking first place now?
        The difference with Argentina is that she did not place her loan on the state. level (like Russia) AND ON THE EXCHANGE FOR PRIVATE DEPOSITS MONEY, AND REFUSED TO PAY FOR THEM.
        I'm not saying that. that the loan given by Russia to Ukraine did not go through the IMF and it is somehow strange to appeal to this organization.
        1. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 10 December 2015 08: 45 New
          +3
          Quote: atalef
          I'm not saying that. that the loan given by Russia to Ukraine did not go through the IMF and it is somehow strange to appeal to this organization.

          Ash stump that suing is useless.
          The only way out is to tie the debt to the upcoming deliveries of gas and electric energy to Banderostan. According to the principle "Still in debt? - Give the old one to start!"
      4. sisa29
        sisa29 10 December 2015 10: 02 New
        0
        Yes, yes, this is a great cunning plan, though not fully implemented; if we managed to bring 15 billion, then the IMF would certainly collapse. And so 3 is somehow weak.
        1. andj61
          andj61 10 December 2015 10: 35 New
          0
          Quote: sisa29
          Yes, yes, this is a great cunning plan, though not fully implemented; if we managed to bring 15 billion, then the IMF would certainly collapse. And so 3 is somehow weak.

          The logic is strange: you, for example, borrow from a neighbor, do not give, but the bank, which also lends to you, should collapse.
          But the loan granted to Ukraine is by no means related to the IMF. The IMF for the sake of Ukraine is changing its own rules, which until now have been unshakable - this is it. But how and on what terms to lend or not to lend to Ukraine is only the IMF’s business. Russia there also has the right to vote, but this vote is negligible compared to the voice of the United States.
    2. Vladimir 1964
      Vladimir 1964 10 December 2015 09: 04 New
      +2
      Quote: Igor39
      If the IMF does not confirm the sovereignty of debt, it is difficult to say about the chances of success.

      A colleague, like the IMF, confirmed the status of debt as sovereign, which, however, did not stop him (the IMF) from immediately changing his lending rules. So it’s hard to judge the chances of international arbitration. The arbitration is based on English (case-law) law, and similar cases, as with Ukraine, modern history does not know, nor does it know the mechanisms for implementing decisions taken in such a case. Therefore, even if a positive arbitration decision is made in our favor, it is not known whether the “non-judgmental” one is ready for its execution.
      Of course, I hope for the best, 3 billion percent, "do not lie on the road," but they leave no doubt.
      Somehow such thoughts arose in the morning based on your comment, colleague. hi
  5. bad
    bad 10 December 2015 06: 56 New
    +9
    Yatsenyuk said that Kiev is ready to sue Moscow for 3-billion debt
    ... and are you not afraid of “polite” collectors? .. each vegetable has its own time, then it may happen that you will be glad to repay the interest with interest, but it will be too late .. angry
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 10 December 2015 07: 10 New
      +3
      Quote: bad
      , then it may happen that you will be glad to repay the interest with interest, but it will be too late.


      take in kind ...
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 10 December 2015 07: 35 New
        0
        Quote: vorobey
        take in kind ...

        Sanya, I won’t be able to do so many times. recourse Hey. drinks
  6. Sorokin
    Sorokin 10 December 2015 06: 58 New
    +2
    It's time to give in the face. They just don’t want to do anything. It is very necessary to give in the face.
  7. pest
    pest 10 December 2015 06: 59 New
    +5
    It is also interesting that the IMF has slipped to the level of credit institutions such as "quick money", where they give loot to everyone, and the poor, and thieves, etc., regardless of credit histories. It is time for this sharagi to revoke the license.
  8. Cu6up9k
    Cu6up9k 10 December 2015 06: 59 New
    0
    As a result, we still forgive the fraternal people and this duty.
  9. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 10 December 2015 07: 02 New
    0
    A thief should sit in jail.
  10. Neophyte
    Neophyte 10 December 2015 07: 04 New
    0
    Having declared this, Senya-rabbit triumphantly pulled up his nose with the look of Napoleon? Moreover, he was left for the second year at the direction of D. Biden!
  11. The comment was deleted.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 10 December 2015 07: 37 New
      0
      Quote: Tankman55
      Brave hare wearing a NATO costume

      In the photo БЧ-678, the team is cleaning the bottom of the shell. smile
  12. zekaze1980
    zekaze1980 10 December 2015 07: 05 New
    0
    Yes, a normal jerboa, only he and his ilk will be able to bring their people to ecstasy.
  13. sgr291158
    sgr291158 10 December 2015 07: 06 New
    +1
    Senya jumped completely crazy. He imagines himself great.
  14. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 10 December 2015 07: 06 New
    +3
    What does ukram have to do? Just sue. Moreover, knowing that the judges are clearly on their side. And wisdom about the law and the drawbar was not without reason invented.
  15. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 10 December 2015 07: 09 New
    +4
    Oh yeah! Such statements are issued by Yatsenyuk with the frequency of a printing press. Biden left "in power"? Another portion of irresponsible idle talk. All will be. And the trial will be. And the default will be. And FEDERALIZATION of Dill will be! But if they try to disobey, then the IMF will suddenly change its mind, and the default will be DEFAULT, and not a line in a newspaper publication.
  16. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 10 December 2015 07: 09 New
    +1
    They took the American suspenders of their pants for body armor. Now "boldly" into battle. That's just as if this "body armor" in the end did not turn out to be cardboard. Although personally Yatsenyuk does not care about it. The main thing is that America is still with Ukraine and it’s possible, as it were, to turn off the mountains.
  17. Zomanus
    Zomanus 10 December 2015 07: 10 New
    +1
    Well, the fact that the IMF is bent does not mean anything.
    There are conditions set by the IMF for Ukraine to receive the next tranche.
    And until the conditions are met and this implementation is not confirmed
    IMF Commission, Ukraine will not receive money.
    That is, in fact, nifiga has not changed, Ukraine will not receive money.
    But the IMF has the ability to drw ... asking from Ukraine is even tougher,
    after all, they made such changes for her sake.
  18. fa2998
    fa2998 10 December 2015 07: 19 New
    +1
    Well, they’ll obviously be suing not in Moscow! And Kiev’s well-wishers completely, already even change the IMF rules in favor of ukrov-they can get loans even in case of default. It’s good suing when the judge and the assessors by your side will not sue! hi
    1. Bluesman
      Bluesman 10 December 2015 07: 45 New
      +1
      Quote: fa2998
      Well, obviously they will be suing not in Moscow!

      in London most likely.
  19. Ruswolf
    Ruswolf 10 December 2015 07: 21 New
    0
    Once DAM said that they are crooks! So crooks!
    If they want to sue, we will sue according to .... the concept!
    Let go of the lads who are sitting with 90x (specialists in such vessels). And for them, work is so simple that they do not sit and benefit the homeland!
    wassat Yaytsenyuhu, internal microchips will correct with soldering irons!
  20. individual
    individual 10 December 2015 07: 33 New
    +1
    This is a toad we raised, fed and warmed, like a native, fraternal country!
  21. The comment was deleted.
    1. Egoza
      Egoza 10 December 2015 08: 24 New
      +3
      Quote: Bluesman
      Antonov may name its new An-178 in honor of Bandera

      "whatever you call a boat, it’ll sail" ... let them call it, this plane will end like Bandera.
      1. pensioneree
        pensioneree 10 December 2015 11: 03 New
        0
        So Rogozin suggested calling the interceptor SMERSH. am
  22. 1536
    1536 10 December 2015 07: 39 New
    +1
    Everyone remembers Krylov’s fable "Elephant and Pug."
    But the Lafontainovsky prototype of the fable "Rat and Elephant" we never quote. Meanwhile, it will be meaner there. Here are quotes from her:

    "Of the smallest Rats, one
    I saw an elephant of enormous size,
    And she laughed here
    Over the tread of his slow and important.

    "The more we need a place in the world!
    Scarecrows for children - such a community!
    I don’t see anything in it,
    Which would be an occasion to honor.
    And no matter how small our family is,
    But less than an elephant an iota
    None of us revered ourselves! ”


    She would continue to speak in the same way;
    But the Cat, a dangerous enemy of their mouse breed,
    He jumped out of the cage and proved to her,
    That the Rat is still not an Elephant.


    It remains to wish the Ukrainian people, especially the Russians who live in Ukraine, so that the same "Cat" does not jump out of the cage ... with all the ensuing consequences (Although Biden already walks and licks his lips).
  23. Riv
    Riv 10 December 2015 07: 44 New
    0
    Isn’t it time to stop clinging with dill and take what they owe us? The internal troops have Chechen experience, we will deal with the Bandera somehow. And 9 out of 10 Ukrainians will breathe a sigh of relief.
    1. Bluesman
      Bluesman 10 December 2015 08: 05 New
      0
      Quote: Riv
      Isn’t it time to stop clinging with dill and take what they owe us? Internal troops have Chechen experience

      funny ... And how the special forces will be $ 3 billion. wring out? In outline.
    2. kuz363
      kuz363 10 December 2015 08: 23 New
      0
      "Yes, and 9 out of 10 Ukrainians will breathe a sigh of relief." But this is a big question. Russia itself is to blame for the debt situation when it played nobility in the spring. Then it was still possible to present an invoice for return. And now blame only yourself. And Russia will not see money for a long time, if ever. And the question - “who is to blame”, as always, will remain unanswered.
  24. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 10 December 2015 07: 45 New
    +2
    The most intelligent of the XXLs is, without a doubt, Mr. Yanukovych! )))
    From Rostov-papa, sitting on the exported "dough" - with a grin he watches this circus!
    Handsome, what can I say! )))
  25. alex-cn
    alex-cn 10 December 2015 07: 47 New
    0
    In my opinion, the calculation is simple here. Installments were offered for 3 years. And how long will the trial last? And there is, at least a small, but a chance, something to grab or knock off. Well, the calculation of the donkey and padishah ....
  26. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 10 December 2015 07: 49 New
    0
    Imagine how the toad is strangling this jerboa now that Yanukovych didn’t have time for all 15bn. receive . About three billion. You can forget, as I understand it. Thank you, kakly, now even the most stupid Russian understood who you are, somewhere between a toad and a cockroach on the evolutionary ladder.
  27. Ros 56
    Ros 56 10 December 2015 07: 57 New
    +2
    Why are you looking at this clown. After all, nothing depends on him. What they say beyond the puddle, it does. Time will pass, all this tramp at the cost of tens of thousands of people's lives will end. In no decent society, these hohlopraviteli not give a hand, and on the threshold will not be allowed, even with stolen billions. They are still despised in geyrop and in phonington, if not for the need to run a hedgehog under the skin of Russia. Sooner or later we will return your money. This is not the case.
    Now we need to get up to all our mighty growth and declare to the whole world - here we are, here is our position on this or that issue, who is with us, the one with us, who is not with us, that is against us, and, accordingly, to build relations. The times when they trampled on us are over. Naturally, everything must be done calmly, respectfully with partners, using all civilized methods, but they are not afraid, in case of urgent need, to aggravate, up to the use of military force. Ignoring the howls of both our liberals and our "crazy friends and partners in the west." But one must begin with oneself, with one's "ingenious" ones, in the sense of money pockets in one's pocket. You can of course write on this subject indefinitely, give examples, facts, etc. To do this, I think, it is necessary to organize a discussion club, a corner or something else. Honestly, I’m tired of watching the famous industrial enterprises die, and with them the cities and, accordingly, people.
  28. Belarus
    Belarus 10 December 2015 07: 59 New
    0
    It seems that the whole madhouse made a collective escape from the places of imprisonment + all were treated by one doctor the patient on his head.
    The patients of the psychiatric hospital: Yaytsenyukh, Parashayenko, Perdogan and some others who are schizan without a name and homeland.

    Doctors who are sick on their own head: Biden, fried Obama, Kerry and, in the role of attendants, geyropeytsy at the head of a fat aunt Merkel.
    1. Bluesman
      Bluesman 10 December 2015 08: 09 New
      0
      Quote: Belarus
      The patients of the psychiatric hospital: Yaytsenyukh, Parashayenko, Perdogan and some others who are schizan without a name and homeland.

      Why Erdie -
      Quote: Belarus
      without a name and homeland.
      ?
      very much "with the motherland" - an Ottoman to the marrow of bones, a collector of Turetschina. The figure, of course, is odious, but I would not have placed him in the same ward with the indicated proforsetki.
  29. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 10 December 2015 08: 01 New
    0
    As for "9 out of 10," I’m not sure the brains of the population were overwhelmed. If the court does not resolve the issue of debt in favor of Russia, we will have to think about how to return it ourselves. The IMF is an organization controlled by the "world government", and among them there is not even a hint of people sympathetic to Russia, and we have a lot of "worshipers" of the West in power and while they are at the trough, the West will always have the hope of "biting off" the Russian pie.
  30. aszzz888
    aszzz888 10 December 2015 08: 07 New
    0
    And why didn’t he, egg? The plane on the aircraft carrier didn’t move! He got a worm-like rabbit! fellow
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. UNAUTHORIZED
    UNAUTHORIZED 10 December 2015 08: 12 New
    0
    What to expect from Yaytsenyukh, my government’s actions hurt me more. After Plato, there was already a demand for small businesses to acquire fiscal cash registers, Medvedev said that our oligarchs were not mentally prepared for a progressive income tax rate (that’s why I talked to someone mentally in a quiet place ) The country is increasingly gaining ground on the position of an oligarchic state.
  33. pensioneree
    pensioneree 10 December 2015 08: 13 New
    +1
    Lord! If I don’t read it, in the morning, about the next pearls Poroshenko and Yaytsenyuk-day didn’t definitely hit! repeat
  34. press officer
    press officer 10 December 2015 08: 31 New
    0
    Quote: avvg
    Perhaps Yatsenyuk thinks that Kiev is ready for war with Russia and is ready to declare war on Russia.



    yeah .. he will declare war to us .. laughing
  35. morpogr
    morpogr 10 December 2015 08: 31 New
    +1
    The battle rabbit scared everyone straight. laughing
  36. wild
    wild 10 December 2015 08: 37 New
    +2
    Well, if yesterday Medvedev said that you can’t see the money, then Yatsenyuk is right ..... Putin and not loot. And so they scatter denyushki at different minks, and to us the increase in prices, the impoverishment of the population and all other charms. And Putin ordered the coal to Khokhlostan. But what about the Partners. And Ukrainians act strictly within the framework specified by Biden.
    1. Johnny51
      Johnny51 10 December 2015 08: 45 New
      0
      Or maybe it’s not worth it, in a boorish manner, to troll the President’s surname ?! Or - the Internet will write everything off ?! Play up
  37. vic58
    vic58 10 December 2015 08: 40 New
    0
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: pest
    The usual thief pretense is that I am not me and my hat is not mine.

    The first question is which court will be sued?
    I understand in international arbitration (and the willingness to sue Ukraine and Russia - as I understand it - recognition of the legitimacy of the court)
    Second question . what to do with Ukraine. if losing the process. will she refuse the legitimacy of the court and refuse to pay?

    Sorry, but the securities were bought back on the Irish stock exchange, i.e. aglitsky court smile , case law !!! ... And then who wants to get ears from a donkey (rabbit) instead of money? bully
    1. atalef
      atalef 10 December 2015 08: 49 New
      0
      Quote: vic58
      Sorry, but the securities were bought back on the Irish stock exchange, i.e. aglitsky court, case-law right !!! ... And who then wants to get ears from a donkey (rabbit) instead of money?

      Ie explain. I'm not quite up to date. The loan was provided by whom? How did the loan given by Russia go through the Irish Exchange?
      as far as I know Ukraine pays for Eurobonds.
  38. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 10 December 2015 08: 42 New
    0
    What else can he say? That he’s not ready and afraid or something! Of course he’s ready! For the sake of them, the IMF put a frog in a pose! Well, how much the ball does not curl and the end will still be. We are 3 billion wrong, so let's take it differently! There are tons of options! You can include this in the prices for them for anything.
  39. Military Builder
    Military Builder 10 December 2015 08: 50 New
    0
    Yatsenyuk’s “mission” now reminds me of a military tactical move, when, when the main forces retreat, they leave one or several, usually volunteers, to detain the pushing enemy, there is almost no chance of survival. And they, if not stupid people, understand this and try to give their lives more expensive. But this is not about Yatsenyuk, because he really is like an Armat tank, and he apparently also exchanged the instinct for self-preservation for bucks.
  40. Foxbed
    Foxbed 10 December 2015 08: 51 New
    0
    FROM:Yatsenyuk said that Kiev is ready to sue Moscow for 3-billion debt
    Apparently the hare knows more than ours about the world justice system .... With cheaters, playing “honestly” is still something you should find yourself! wink
  41. radogost
    radogost 10 December 2015 08: 53 New
    0
    Bold UCROCOL) I got drunk, and thinks she will have time to blame .... DOUBT (he will have to remember Chechnya again) soldier
  42. BOB044
    BOB044 10 December 2015 08: 54 New
    0
    And Yatsenek what, out of pocket to pay. He is stealing his own slowly and normally. And there Russia is suing not to sue Ukraine for debt. He doesn’t care, the main thing is that he rings in his pocket. And what will happen to Ukraine, they don’t care if they have tickets to other countries in their pockets. hi
  43. Voha_krim
    Voha_krim 10 December 2015 09: 09 New
    +1
    And here's some more news

    The official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Maria Zakharova, commented on the statement by the head of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine on the possible default by the state of obligations on debt.
    Earlier, the Minister of Finance of Ukraine Natalia Yaresko confirmed the possibility of refusing to pay the debt of Russia for three billion dollars by the deadline until December 21. Yaresko explained this by the existing "strong pressure from the people who oppose the return of this debt."
    "There are no questions. Only one thing: the" strong pressure "from the people of Crimea is counted as an argument for returning to Russia," Zakharova wrote on her Facebook page.
  44. Cananecat
    Cananecat 10 December 2015 09: 20 New
    0
    Well, Russia will sue, well, they will win ... what does this give us? Once again, lower the 404th hand below the baseboard? I think that such a move by the IMF was calculated, and this creates a certain precedent in the future ... they will receive loans and pay debts from these loans. After all, if you think about it, then just like that, "out of spite", they will not lend. There is some sense in all this fuss.
  45. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 10 December 2015 09: 37 New
    0
    we are ready to sue Russia, we are fully armed

    The main "armor" of Yatsenyuk is a hysterical air shock.
  46. shura7782
    shura7782 10 December 2015 09: 51 New
    +1
    The fact that money has already been lost has become clear since we talked about it.
  47. sisa29
    sisa29 10 December 2015 10: 22 New
    +1
    Say stupid rabbit? Let's play a little numbers:
    Submarine Varshavyanka on average sold for 300 million
    Money lost in Ukraine 3 in terms of boats-000 Varshavyanak.
    Te USA with the hands of a stupid rabbit drowned a squadron of 10 Varshavyanka

    Although not everything is so bad, we initially wanted to give 15 000 0000 0000 te could drown 50 boats !!! God had no mercy!

  48. iouris
    iouris 10 December 2015 10: 55 New
    +2
    It seems like a trap. The beneficiary in this case is the United States. Loss in court will set a precedent and the Russian Federation will lose the opportunity to repay "long" debts from the United States. It is impossible to return the money that the government and structures invested in the colonialists. In this case, “short loans” will have to be paid. Even if the Russian Federation wins in court, it will be impossible to execute a court decision. On the other hand, the downing of a Boeing in 2014 was used to rule the Hague court in favor of the shareholders of Yukos and Nevzlin. There it was a much larger sum.
    In turn, the Russian Federation does not recognize decisions of international courts. In such circumstances, it is strange to go to court. Instead of going to court, you need to use the situation and get out of the IMF, WTO and other colonial structures.
  49. Termit1309
    Termit1309 10 December 2015 10: 55 New
    +1
    Quote: sisa29
    Say stupid rabbit? Let's play a little numbers:
    Submarine Varshavyanka on average sold for 300 million
    Money lost in Ukraine 3 in terms of boats-000 Varshavyanak.
    Te USA with the hands of a stupid rabbit drowned a squadron of 10 Varshavyanka

    You obviously outplayed some strategy. Turn off the computer, let it cool. Go somewhere yourself - to the rink, go to the movies or take lessons.
    But in real life, these submarines do not change for money. Here you need to build them, train the crew, create an infrastructure for them ... In short, you will not understand
    1. pensioneree
      pensioneree 10 December 2015 11: 17 New
      0
      Many years ago .... in those days !!! one economist told why the USSR is profitable to sell tractors to China in exchange for pork carcass. It's not so simple. what
    2. sisa29
      sisa29 10 December 2015 12: 09 New
      0
      Judging by your comment, you knowingly set yourself higher and smarter than me. Good your right. I partially agree with your arguments, by the way, the squadron had to be added on the slipways, although it is more correct at the mooring wall and without a crew.

      As TsAMTO previously reported, a contract worth about $ 1,8 billion to supply the Vietnamese Navy with six diesel-electric submarines of Project 636.1 was signed on December 15, 2009 during a visit to Vietnam by Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Zung. What do you think in what we measured the value of these boats?
      1. sisa29
        sisa29 10 December 2015 13: 05 New
        0
        Although if you consider the boat example to be bad, then the cost of building a new school is $ 8. It turns out that we took 000 new schools from us.
  50. Normal ok
    Normal ok 10 December 2015 11: 33 New
    +2
    Ukrainians began to steal gas even when Yushchenko, so how much can you support them?

    Do not be naive. Everyone who has ever been allowed (except the last year) in Ukraine to the gas deriban ALWAYS acted with the unspoken approval of Moscow. All intermediary firms were JOINT. For example, a monopoly gas intermediary between Ukraine and Russia in 2004-2009. that is, with the said yushchenko !! RosUkrEnergo company - 50% owned by Gazprombank !!!!!! And the percentage of the stolen was always regularly unfastened "whoever needs it" in Belokamennaya! And the public rhetoric of Gazprom’s leaders never prevented them from continuing to do the same. As the saying goes: "nothing personal - only business." The rest is noodles on the ears of the population. Grazing, zrada-peremoga.
    1. Ros 56
      Ros 56 11 December 2015 09: 49 New
      0
      You don't think like a sergeant.