Khodorkovsky on an imaginary armored car ...

96
Having received (through his father) a subpoena as accused of killing the mayor of Nefteyugansk Vladimir Petukhov (the mayor was killed on 26 on June 1998), Mikhail Khodorkovsky suddenly realized that he had missed "his move." If earlier the ex-prisoner, after pardoning the president, announced that he would never, never even think about political activities, was marked by publications about the “Kremlin regime” on an almost constant basis, then recently, as they say, he didn’t allow himself to snore, and missed the hook from the Investigative Committee of Russia.

The RF IC invites Mikhail Borisovich to visit a cup of tea for his supposedly entertaining story about why it so coincided that the mayor of Nefteyugansk was killed on the 35 anniversary of the “young and promising” MBH, and then the defendants pointed at the top YUKOS as a group of main customers for the murder of Vladimir Petuhov.

A scanned copy of the invitation was published by the ex-sideler himself.
Khodorkovsky on an imaginary armored car ...


Posted with comment:
Father today dragged. As if my address is not known. I inform: Hanover sq. 16 A sad attempt to change the topic of discussion.


As you can see, the murder of a man for Mikhail Borisovich is the topic of "dull", and, therefore, an ordinary one ... They say it would be something to discuss ... Just think, murder ...

To answer the investigating authorities of Russia with his blow, if possible, “into the nine,” Mikhail Borisovich chose a favorite trick. The method is connected with the action of Khodorkovsky’s formula: you can’t justify yourself or at least give a clear answer to the accusations - call for non-compliance with the laws and for the revolution in Russia. Not ready to call - at least predict ...



During his press conference, which MBH gathered precisely for the purpose of making a “missed move”, he said that, he says, for the third year in a row, Russia received “New Year presents” in the form of new charges, that neither personally, neither YUKOS has any relation whatsoever that the investigation itself is headed by Alexander Bastrykin himself, who was “recommended by Putin’s friends”. Having sent for all the details of those present at the “press conference” to Wikipedia, Khodorkovsky included his favorite record with the “compositions” in the modern arrangement.

From the speech by MBH (text taken from Khodorkovsky’s website) to grateful listeners outside Russia:
When I got out of prison and was sent abroad (this is news - it is sent, it turns out ... Well, if sent - come back, "dear friend" - approx. author), the situation favored them: huge reserves from ultrahigh prices for oil, friendly Ukrainian leadership, practically forgiven by the West war in Georgia, 30 rubles per dollar and, accordingly, no protests.

Only two years have passed, and what do we see now? Reserves end in 2017, and then only because the dollar was driven over 69 rubles. If such a devaluation had not occurred, the reserves would have run out earlier. The standard of living of the population fell by 20% and falls further. Habitual resting places have become unavailable.

Patience breaks through protests provoked by the pathological greed of Putin’s entourage. Truckers - this is only the first swallow.

With Ukraine is a military conflict. Thousands killed. And yet nothing is over.

With Turkey, the conflict between trade and normal war of value.

Western sanctions - they not only reduce reserves, but also freeze the technological backwardness of many industries. Young people, specialists choose to go abroad to continue their careers.


Then, clearly stung by that very agenda in the Main Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Michal Borisych gathered together everything he remembered: about the “remnants of the reserve”, about the “Chaek affair”, and about the struggle for the right to a peaceful picket, and about the “inner circle” Kadyrov ", and even, oh, horror! about the Russian mafia in Spain ... This is the scope: from Chechnya to the Pyrenean ranges. Well, isn't that a broad man, this Mr. Khodorkovsky? And then ...

The stormy speech of Michal Borisych led him to the conclusion that “the inevitability of the revolution in Russia”.

Understanding that after that they can invite him to a cup of tea in the RF IC not only in the case of the murder of the mayor of Nefteyugansk, but also on a new charge of calling for the overthrow of the constitutional system in the Russian Federation, the MBH, in its own way, was “reinsured” by announcing in advance that this, they say, now in Russia everything is completely unconstitutional, and he, he says, calls for a “peaceful and effective revolution” of a purely, of course, democratic sense. And what else? Was it Kiev Maidan was undemocratic? But whoever will say this, let him be the first to throw a stone at the MBH - MBH knows for sure: the stone will not reach its current place of residence ...

At the end of the speech, Khodorkovsky clearly needed at least a small armored car, for how can such words be uttered without an armored car:
Return to the legal field of such a situation is called a revolution. It is inevitable and necessary. Revolution is a good word. It can and should be peaceful. Making a revolution peaceful is our common task.


It seems that the phrase “revolution is a good word” launched a shoe into the screen (if, God forbid, the ex-sitter’s show was watching) baroness Irina Vladimirovna von Dreyer, the daughter of the Russian army general Vladimir von Dreyer, left Russia with her family 5 years and recently asked the President of Russia for Russian citizenship.

Irina von Dreyer (born 1915) in a letter:
I appeal to the justice and nobility of your Excellency in order to return me Russian citizenship for the anniversary, because I want to meet with the Creator not as a foreigner, but as a real citizen of Russia, Russian in heart and soul.


On November 28, Vladimir Putin signed a decree granting Russian citizenship to Irina Vladimirovna.

So, if Irina Vladimirovna, God forbid, heard that Khodorkovsky blurted out (otherwise you can’t say otherwise), who violated his own word and now declared about “returning to politics”, then I think I wouldn’t have regretted a strong wit to tell in colors to this subject, what revolution really means for Russia, and how much “peaceful” it is ...

Well, in the end of the MBH. One gets the impression that this is already a tradition: an individual who committed a crime, fouled up in his home country, and having a personal “candle factory” left over due to the absence of an article on the confiscation of property, at one fine moment suddenly wants to play with a stomach cramp, moreover, with the approval of the "friends of Russia" ...
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      10 December 2015 06: 24
      Take this gentleman (Khodorkovsky), but in Solovki!
      1. +5
        10 December 2015 06: 49
        Enot-poloskun"Take this gentleman (Khodorkovsky), but in Solovki!"- Solovki was closed even under Stalin, in 1937. This camp was founded by the British when they landed in Arkhangelsk, from there people were transported to Solovki. This camp had no economic significance, it was built simply as a death camp, potamu and was quickly closed ...
        1. +6
          10 December 2015 08: 15
          Quote: venaya
          Solovki was closed under Stalin, in 1937.

          Open. And not only for him. I think the "attendance" will be high.
          1. 0
            10 December 2015 18: 09
            Open. And not only for him. I think "attendance" will be at a high level
            And what, to put the "fifth column" there in the cells, there will be no end of tourists to see them. smile
        2. 0
          10 December 2015 09: 09
          It’s possible to use Solovki’s current sins as well. Anything is better than pouring mud on a country, and even after you have been pardoned and you promised not to do nonsense.
      2. +2
        10 December 2015 07: 01
        Quote: Enot-poloskun
        Take this gentleman (Khodorkovsky), but in Solovki!


        g (pea) a piece.
      3. +3
        10 December 2015 15: 23
        What now beads to throw ??? They released the jackal, with a promise not to climb into the chicken coop, now they bite their elbows. There China from America, manages to steal its dissidents secretly and take them out in the holds, and not just one but not blather. The Yankees were indignant a little and fell silent.
  2. +4
    10 December 2015 06: 15
    How could one believe this thief and killer?
    1. +6
      10 December 2015 08: 29
      Quote: Igor39
      How could one believe this thief and killer?


      He thinks a hero. Only it does not take into account the fact that PREDATORS and ACCESSORIES are despised, although they are used for their own purposes, and as unnecessary they are thrown into the dustbin. There are plenty of examples of this, and the latter is Berezovsky with his inglorious end. negative
    2. 0
      10 December 2015 11: 56
      Eh)) how naive is the Lord)))
      Hodor would come to power, we would have other characters and perpetrators) inversely proportional to the current))) and the authorities would have other friends and other relatives)
    3. +1
      10 December 2015 12: 26
      For such people, there is a very accurate wording, the Christ seller.
      1. +2
        10 December 2015 14: 02
        Christ seller? He is a Jew! Therefore, without Christ in the soul. And to sell something in their blood.
  3. +4
    10 December 2015 06: 22
    When released, he promised not to engage in politics, the country did not crap. That still political forgive. Point!
    1. -20
      10 December 2015 07: 00
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      When released, he promised not to engage in politics, the country did not crap. That still political forgive. Point!

      You know, this is your statement, it says only one thing that Khodorkovsky was in favor of politics, and not of embezzlement.
      If he sat for embezzlement (like any citizen of Russia), then no one has the right to forbid him (after serving his term or pardon) to engage in political activities. Or was the Constitution written for all citizens of Russia except Khodorkovsky?
      Let's separate the flies from the cutlets.
      All these statements of Bystirkin, Peskov - look not just ridiculous, but wretched.
      I do not make a saint out of Hodor - everyone stole. they steal under the current regime and no less than him.
      He at least (unlike most) term in 18 (in my opinion) rewound.
      But for the authorities. for some reason he is much more dangerous than Serdyukov and Ko - who stole no less. but not a day in prison.
      They are afraid of him, apparently not in vain, otherwise they would not have bothered so much on him.
      1. +9
        10 December 2015 07: 10
        Quote: atalef
        I do not make a saint out of Hodor - everyone stole. they steal under the current regime and no less than him.

        What does this mean: "Everyone stole"- Who is everyone? The whole people? Why blame the whole people, otherwise some kind of Nazism turns out and nothing else. I propose to express it more precisely, otherwise it somehow turns out badly.
        1. -15
          10 December 2015 07: 59
          Quote: venaya
          What does it mean: "Everyone stole" - who is everyone?

          to list?
          tell me (so offhand) - where, for example, from Peskov such grandmas? at Shoigu’s house and residence, Sechin. kaktam him? the head of Russian Railways - millions and billions from whom? we are talking about government officials who are supposed to live on a salary and nothing more.
          Quote: venaya
          ? All the people?

          Here people just do not drag in - Khodorkovsky - not the people. sand - not the people. A seagull is not a people. Serdyukov is not a people
          the only difference is. that one was sitting. and others not.
          Quote: venaya
          I suggest, all the same, to express myself more accurately, otherwise it somehow turns out badly

          you want precision in expressions 7
          Do you really believe. that Putin’s entire property is a Skif trailer. dvushka in St. Petersburg and the 2nd 21st Volga?
          1. +14
            10 December 2015 08: 37
            Quote: atalef
            where did Peskov get such money? at Shoigu’s house and residence, Sechin ...

            And why are you all interfering in the affairs of a foreign state? You better tell us about your gang who is there: the Rothschild families, Baruchs, Openheimers and whoever else is there, their name is "legion". And where did they get their money? Hundreds of families own properties worth more than 50% of the total value of the entire world. And why are you all on trifles and on trifles, let's better go for big ones right away. All you listed are just petty thieves, so scold and put on the look, no more. Another thing is the problem of high treason: here the question should be posed in a coordinated manner: if it is noticed in financing by foreign states for the purpose of political influence on the decisions of state. problems, then there should be no questions - execution on the spot, as it was, for example, in the 18th year. Do you disagree with that?
            1. -6
              10 December 2015 10: 58
              Quote: venaya
              Why are you all interfering in the affairs of a foreign state?

              I hope my intervention is not recognized as state? And in everything else, I am the same as you, because since 1969 I am a citizen of the USSR, and since 1991 - Russia and no one has deprived me of this citizenship
              Quote: venaya
              ? You better tell us about your gang who is there: the Rothschild families, Baruchs, Openheimers and who else is there, their name is "legion

              You are better - you know better about them
              Quote: venaya
              Hundreds of families own property worth more than 50% of the total value of the world

              May I have a part?
              Quote: venaya
              . All of you listed are just petty thieves


              but still thieves? How much in Russia can I get for a stolen mobile phone?
              Quote: venaya
              . Another matter is the problem of high treason: here the question must be posed in a coordinated way: if it is noticed in financing by foreign states with the aim of political upheaval on the decisions of state. problems, then there should be no questions - shooting on the spot

              And I thought, in general, that the court should prove it. least
              Quote: venaya
              as it was, for example, in the 18th year. Do you disagree with this?

              No, I'm for the court.
            2. +1
              10 December 2015 10: 58
              Quote: venaya
              Why are you all interfering in the affairs of a foreign state?

              I hope my intervention is not recognized as state? And in everything else, I am the same as you, because since 1969 I am a citizen of the USSR, and since 1991 - Russia and no one has deprived me of this citizenship
              Quote: venaya
              ? You better tell us about your gang who is there: the Rothschild families, Baruchs, Openheimers and who else is there, their name is "legion

              You are better - you know better about them
              Quote: venaya
              Hundreds of families own property worth more than 50% of the total value of the world

              May I have a part?
              Quote: venaya
              . All of you listed are just petty thieves


              but still thieves? How much in Russia can I get for a stolen mobile phone?
              Quote: venaya
              . Another matter is the problem of high treason: here the question must be posed in a coordinated way: if it is noticed in financing by foreign states with the aim of political upheaval on the decisions of state. problems, then there should be no questions - shooting on the spot

              And I thought, in general, that the court should prove it. least
              Quote: venaya
              as it was, for example, in the 18th year. Do you disagree with this?

              No, I'm for the court.
              1. -1
                10 December 2015 20: 21
                Here are small fragments of the statements of great people about, so to speak, people like Khodorkovsky.

                Giordano Bruno
                "Jews are a plagued, leper and dangerous race that deserves to be eradicated from the day it was born."


                Henry Ford
                “Take control of the 50 richest Jewish financiers who create wars for their own profits, and wars will be eliminated.”


                Arthur Schopenhauer
                "The Jews are the greatest virtuosos of lies."


                Johann Wolfgan Goethe
                "They Jews have a faith that blesses them to steal strangers."


                Eugene Dühring
                “The animosity, fueled by the Jews from time immemorial, to all other peoples, is international in nature, and therefore the solution of the Jewish problem lies with the responsibilities of all states. Jews threaten not one or another people individually, but the whole of humanity. ”


                Napoleon Bonaparte
                “Jews should be seen as a nation, but not as a religious group. They are a nation in the middle of our nation.
                The property of entire villages is plundered by Jews, they restored slavery, they are real flocks of ravens. The poverty caused by the Jews does not come from one individual Jew, but is the essence of all this people. They are like caterpillars or locusts that eat France. Jews are a nation capable of the worst crimes. ”


                George Washington
                “It is very unfortunate that not a single state older than this has humbled them like the plague of society and its greatest enemies, whose presence has made America happy.”


                Muhammad
                “It is incomprehensible to me that so far no one has expelled these cattle, whose breath is like death. Will everyone destroy wild animals devouring people, even if they themselves have a human appearance? Are the Jews anything other than human eaters? ”


                Martin Luther
                “The longing desire of the screaming hearts of the Jews hopes for the day when they can deal with us, the Gentiles, just as they did with the Gentiles in Persia during the time of Esther. And how the Jews love this book of Esther, which justifies their bloodthirstiness, revenge and appetites of robber hopes! "The sun has never shone a people more bloodthirsty and vengeful, who cherishes the idea of ​​destruction and strangulation of the Gentiles."

                Probably enough. To start.
          2. +4
            10 December 2015 10: 24
            Atalef You better write about the son of the late Sharon in the comments, it will be more honest.
        2. 0
          10 December 2015 08: 22
          He’s his own Hodor, the Jews will not blame him, the Russians are to blame ....
          1. -7
            10 December 2015 08: 36
            Quote: Igor39
            He’s his own Hodor, the Jews will not blame him, the Russians are to blame ....

            Hodor is not ours. he is yours and the same citizen of Russia as you are - so my question is essentially.
            Based on what article of the constitution. is it forbidden for a person who has served his term and pardoned by presidential decree to participate in political life?
            1. +8
              10 December 2015 09: 03
              Yes, and an article? He was pardoned because of a sick mother, a word was taken from him, and he deceived, so how can he be believed after all?
              1. -1
                10 December 2015 09: 17
                Quote: Igor39
                Yes, and an article? He was pardoned because of a sick mother, a word was taken from him, and he deceived, so how can he be believed after all?

                What word did you take? And what right did they have if they did not comply with the Russian constitution?
                1. 0
                  10 December 2015 09: 57
                  Well, he said that he would not engage in politics, why did he say that then?
                2. 0
                  10 December 2015 12: 07
                  Well then, Mr. Khodorkovsky is the true master of the word. I wanted to give my word, I wanted to take it! The owner of the bl ....! No honor, no conscience.
            2. +1
              10 December 2015 12: 20
              Hodor is not ours. he is yours and the same citizen of Russia as you are - so my question is essentially.


              Who forbids him? He himself said that he would not. It’s immediately obvious that the owner of his word, wanted - gave, wanted - took it back.
            3. Fox
              -1
              10 December 2015 12: 43
              Quote: atalef
              atalef

              zaminusili you, dear. but I missed, you are right. the materials of the case are interesting and ridiculous, and his government fears more than thieves in power ... how so?
      2. +4
        10 December 2015 07: 25
        Quote: atalef
        He at least (unlike most) term in 18 (in my opinion) rewound.

        10 years and a month, including a pre-trial detention center.
        Quote: atalef
        But for the authorities. for some reason it is much more dangerous

        More likely by inertia. If you take him as an individual, politics (his potential at the Yavlinsky level). Most worried about his funding channels.
        1. -1
          10 December 2015 08: 02
          Quote: ImPerts
          10 years and a month, including a pre-trial detention center.

          not a little. tell me how long did Vasiliev sit?
          Or Storchak? By the way, again working in the rank of deputy minister.
          Quote: ImPerts
          More likely by inertia.

          Inertia - made fun.
          like after leaving it, no one bothered. and it was worth making a couple of speeches on political topics - so immediately became a suspect in the murder
          Quote: ImPerts
          If we take him as an individual, politics (his potential at the Yavlinsky level)

          That is what is strange. reaction of authorities
          Quote: ImPerts
          His channels of financing are more alarming.

          Yes . okay. money then he has enough.
          1. +3
            10 December 2015 08: 37
            Let's talk right away, either politely on "you" or "you". On "you" did not seem to agree.
            Quote: atalef
            Inertia - made fun.

            Laughter prolongs life.
            Quote: atalef
            tell me how long did Vasiliev sit?
            Or Storchak? By the way, again working in the rank of deputy minister.

            AND? Many go red, but not many pay a fine. Some on the commission give false testimony, and then do not resign, before bombing the whole country, since the gas lake did not attack for long.
            Quote: atalef
            like after leaving it, no one bothered. and it was worth making a couple of speeches on political topics - so immediately became a suspect in the murder

            He had been suspected before, the investigation was ongoing and did not stop.
            Quote: atalef
            That is what is strange. reaction of authorities

            Quote: ImPerts
            More likely by inertia. If you take him as an individual, politics (his potential at the Yavlinsky level).

            Quote: atalef
            but . okay. money then he has enough.

            It's not about that. but about the established channels for financing everything and everyone. Wasn't he by chance managing to finance everyone? Wasn't he sponsoring everyone at the expense of money taken away with the help of troubled schemes?
            1. +2
              10 December 2015 10: 37
              atalef, as usual, teaches the life and justice of Russians, but at the same time does not want to notice flaws in the politics of the state of which it became a citizen. And the Jews are woeful for Khodorkovsky, let the criminal (though they believe that he was not deservedly convicted), but ours.
      3. +3
        10 December 2015 08: 43
        Talk to the residents of Yugansk Oil, they will explain who ordered the murder of the mayor. Our law enforcement officers simply could not prove this at the time.
        1. +1
          10 December 2015 12: 52
          Quote: Hyppopotut
          Talk to the residents of Yugansk Oil, they will explain who ordered the murder of the mayor. Our law enforcement officers simply could not prove this at the time.

          In the case of Chicotilo. seven were planted. one was shot. one himself hanged himself from despair - and they proved
          It’s strange. that for 10 years of sitting and a year of freedom. nobody got confused and Sk first of all with what every inhabitant of Nefteyugansk seemed to know about.
          And as soon as Khodor blurted out something, Bystyrkin appeared immediately.
          Of course, I don’t believe in coincidences, everything is exclusively in legal norms.
        2. 0
          10 December 2015 12: 52
          Quote: Hyppopotut
          Talk to the residents of Yugansk Oil, they will explain who ordered the murder of the mayor. Our law enforcement officers simply could not prove this at the time.

          In the case of Chicotilo. seven were planted. one was shot. one himself hanged himself from despair - and they proved
          It’s strange. that for 10 years of sitting and a year of freedom. nobody got confused and Sk first of all with what every inhabitant of Nefteyugansk seemed to know about.
          And as soon as Khodor blurted out something, Bystyrkin appeared immediately.
          Of course, I don’t believe in coincidences, everything is exclusively in legal norms.
      4. +8
        10 December 2015 08: 47
        Quote: atalef
        I do not make a saint out of Hodor - everyone stole


        I can not say anything about you, but I did not steal, my relatives, friends, acquaintances, classmates did not steal. So, as the gospel says, do not judge and you will not be judged. And Khodorkovsky is a thief and he was tried as a thief, and he served 10 years for a particularly large-scale theft. And when he was released on the basis of a presidential pardon, he tearfully swore and swore that he did not hold a grudge against justice and would not engage in illegal activities. Now the circumstances were revealed, according to which he is being summoned to court, as a citizen of Russia, but here, too, he showed his cowardly nature. Thank you for not hanging the icon with "Khodor" in the red corner, otherwise you might have thought .... hi
      5. +3
        10 December 2015 08: 54
        atalef .... I do not make a saint out of Hodor - everyone stole. they steal under the current regime and no less than him.

        "The Hodor case" - a blow to the oligarchy who has been ruling the country since 1996,
        when THEY dragged in, already incapacitated, Yeltsin for a second term, and actually began to rule the country through their daughter Tatyana and Yumashev. After the "Hodor case", some of the oligarchs fled abroad, the other part that remained in the country swelled up.
        So, the "Hodor case" is the transformation of power in the country.
        1. -1
          10 December 2015 09: 20
          Quote: askort154
          atalef .... I do not make a saint out of Hodor - everyone stole. they steal under the current regime and no less than him.

          "The Hodor case" - a blow to the oligarchy who has been ruling the country since 1996,
          when THEY dragged in, already incapacitated, Yeltsin for a second term, and actually began to rule the country through their daughter Tatyana and Yumashev. After the "Hodor case", some of the oligarchs fled abroad, the other part that remained in the country swelled up.
          So, the "Hodor case" is the transformation of power in the country.

          Well, who sat down? Strongly converted? Khodorkovsky to Rotenberg laughing
          1. +4
            10 December 2015 09: 51
            atalef ... Well, who sat down? Strongly transformed? Khodorkovsky to Rotenberg.

            The transformation is that they do not meddle in politics PERSONALLY.
            After Hodor, only Prokhor tried ... But where is he?
            (I never minus)
            1. -5
              10 December 2015 10: 44
              Quote: askort154
              The transformation is that they do not go into politics PERSONALLY. After Hodor, only Prokhor tried ... But where is he? (I never minus)

              strange, I'm talking about the rights of any citizen of the Russian Federation, and you tell me about the steadfastness of the autocracy.
              Quote: velikoros-xnumx
              Atalef You better write about the son of the late Sharon in the comments, it will be more honest.

              Of course, why not.
              He was admitted to fraud with money for his father's election campaign - he went to prison.
              Any other questions?

              Quote: Igor39
              Well, he said that he would not engage in politics, why did he say that then?

              Answer my question ? Is there an article in the Constitution of the Russian Federation that allows forcing a person to refuse to engage in political activity? If not, then taking this promise from him, subject to early release, by any adequate court would be recognized as not legal and not having any legal force.
              And the accusation (after his speeches) of the murder - with the usual blackmail and ordering
              Quote: eugraphus
              The word to keep in Russia was worth a lot, but not for people like Khodorkovsky

              Come on you. as to keep my word, in five minutes I dig up so much that Putin said and did not fulfill.
              Quote: eugraphus
              . Formally, it is not forbidden to participate in political life, but they tried to agree with him

              It is not legal to push - you wanted to say.
              We generally talk about the rights of a citizen of the Russian Federation enshrined in the Constitution
              Quote: eugraphus
              Indeed, they put him in prison for politics, but he still didn’t understand anything and again crawls into the same kaku.

              Bravo, did anyone have doubts?
              Quote: eugraphus
              But it can still be raked, if it does not calm down.

              Like any citizen of Russia (as I understand it), and depending on the importance, he can get rid of the State or the deputy of the village council Pupkin.
              And now there’s nowhere to complain. ECHR - has no power in Russia.
              Just remember - today Khodorkovsky can rally, tomorrow you.
              And your neighbors will applaud this.
              1. +1
                10 December 2015 11: 03
                No one from Khodorkovsky required any promises. He himself pointed out that he would not conduct political activity in the petition for pardon, which the GDP signed. So what about the Constitution and human rights here by the cash register.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. -3
                  10 December 2015 11: 08
                  Quote: Cook
                  No one from Khodorkovsky required any promises. He himself pointed out that he would not conduct political activity in the petition for pardon, which the GDP signed. So what about the Constitution and human rights here by the cash register.

                  Well then, it’s even easier, I didn’t want it today - I wanted it tomorrow.
                  What is the problem ?
                  Today you like watermelon - tomorrow pig pig cartilage.
                  Quote: svidrigailov
                  Please note: when Khodorkovsky was sitting, the dollar was 30 rubles, in Ukraine - peace and order, with Europe and the USA - friendship, crazy reserves, oil - $ 100. per barrel. And when he was released, it all started

                  good
              2. 0
                10 December 2015 16: 40
                [quote = velikoros-88] Atalef You better write about the son of the late Sharon in the comments, it will be more honest. [/ quote]
                Of course, why not.
                He was admitted to fraud with money for his father's election campaign - he went to prison.
                Any other questions?
                [/ Quote]
                I had no questions, there was a request to pay more attention to your higher echelon, but we will somehow figure it out with ours, thanks of course that you don’t let us forget the names of the "heroes", but somehow we don’t complain about memory. Russians have a genetically good memory, everything has its time.
            2. The comment was deleted.
      6. +3
        10 December 2015 09: 05
        Khodor is not dangerous to the authorities, but the fact that his foundation includes teachers Brzeszczynski and Rothschild, and people on the board who are wanted by the Russian Federation for embezzlement of millions, speaks volumes. Justice? Hodor had nothing to do with the killings? And you ask the guy who, as a boy and his sister, hid under the bed when their parents were killed outside the garage door. Yukos bandits did not leave them even the bodies of their parents! I hate it.
      7. 0
        10 December 2015 09: 05
        Khodor is not dangerous to the authorities, but the fact that his foundation includes teachers Brzeszczynski and Rothschild, and people on the board who are wanted by the Russian Federation for embezzlement of millions, speaks volumes. Justice? Hodor had nothing to do with the killings? And you ask the guy who, as a boy and his sister, hid under the bed when their parents were killed outside the garage door. Yukos bandits did not leave them even the bodies of their parents! I hate it.
        1. 0
          10 December 2015 09: 50
          I apologize for the errors, my fingers sometimes fall into the wrong buttons, my eyesight falls.
          Who can explain to me how it turns out that two identical comments are obtained? Is that a virus, or the second for shtirlits?
          1. 0
            10 December 2015 12: 23
            Quote: Balu
            Who can explain to me how it turns out that two identical comments are obtained? Is that a virus, or the second for shtirlits?

            Use the android device, with unstable communication.
            1. 0
              11 December 2015 09: 12
              No, from a computer at home.
      8. +1
        10 December 2015 12: 17
        You know, this is your statement, it says only one thing that Khodorkovsky was sitting for politics


        It’s not about that. And it says that "it" does not know how to answer for its words. Actually, no one forbade this miracle to engage in politics. GDP is not foolish to think that this ban will be somehow observed. But the hodor, so that he was ready to get off the bunk, was already ready to promise anything. And now no self-respecting person will ever vote for him and will not believe him. Because he showed himself to be a liar. Whichever side you look at.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          10 December 2015 12: 40
          Quote: alicante11
          It’s not about that. And it says that "it" does not know how to answer for its words

          name the corresponding article of Uk. which it falls under

          Quote: alicante11
          This miracle, in fact, no one forbade to engage in politics. GDP isn’t too foolish to think that this ban will be somehow enforced

          Then otkel got out this thing?
          Quote: alicante11
          And here’s a hodor, so that he could get off his bunks he was ready to promise anything.

          The normal reaction of any prisoner
          Quote: alicante11
          And now, not a single self-respecting person will ever vote for him or believe him.

          then why all the fuss?
          Quote: alicante11
          Because he proved himself a liar. Which side to look at.

          In the sense that he promised not to go into politics and climbed?
          Well, if a deception of this level is considered such a terrible lie. then I'm sorry - who in the same Duma is honest?
          Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the treatment of officials abroad can be compared with their foreign accounts.

          He said this at the ONF forum on health issues, RIA Novosti reports.

          The head of state said that high-ranking officials should not be treated outside the country, and their children should be educated in Russian universities. "Of course, this is such a moral choice. To prohibit, to force it would be wrong, but to induce a person to use the services of national health care or education, of course, is possible," the president said. He also added that he personally draws attention to this.

          Joseph Kobzon, who is on the EU sanctions list, received a medical visa and will soon go to Europe for treatment. Earlier, at an online conference in Moskovsky Komsomolets, the singer said that he would ask the President of Russia for help in this matter. Now he said that indeed, thanks to Putin, this problem has been solved.
          1. 0
            10 December 2015 13: 14
            name the corresponding article of Uk. which it falls under


            And what does the Criminal Code have to do with it? He wasn’t invited to the prosecutor for politics or lies. And for very specific criminal offenses.

            Then otkel got out this thing?


            So "hotel". They were kept in a storehouse. After all, he was going to solder the "third term", then it was not useful, now it is useful.

            then why all the fuss?


            But I don’t know why you were so excited? Something about the Criminal Code, about prostitution and about Vasiliev. In your opinion, if one thief was not imprisoned, do you really need to plant anyone?

            In the sense that he promised not to go into politics and climbed?
            Well, if a deception of this level is considered such a terrible lie. then I'm sorry - who in the same Duma is honest?


            A lie - it is always a lie. Especially for a politician who is always in sight. And to prove yourself a liar is to fish your career.

            Deny make it wrong, but to encourage a person to


            Key words, therefore, went to be treated, that "force" cannot but go.
            What did you give this example to? How does he feel about hodor? As well as Vasiliev? Well, God is divine, Caesar is Caesar's, and locksmith is fitter. Or do you have a select few, don't you? are all equal on selection?
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              10 December 2015 13: 24
              Quote: alicante11
              And what does the Criminal Code have to do with it? He wasn’t invited to the prosecutor for politics or lies. And for very specific criminal offenses.

              Well, it's like in the old joke - Spoons were found, but the sediment remained

              Quote: alicante11
              So "hotel". Held in a stash

              good
              Quote: alicante11
              But I don’t know why you were so excited? Something about the Criminal Code, about prostitution and about Vasiliev. In your opinion, if one thief was not imprisoned, do you really need to plant anyone?

              No, in my opinion if they planted one, then all the same. And then they don’t touch their own.
              Quote: alicante11
              A lie - it is always a lie. Especially for a politician who is always in sight. And to prove yourself a liar is to fish your career.

              Remember these words.
              Quote: alicante11
              Key words, that's why I went to get treatment, that "force" cannot but go. What in general did you bring this example?

              Yes, so that I would understand. That with all things being equal - there is more equal
              Quote: alicante11
              How does he feel about hodor? As well as Vasiliev?

              Quote: alicante11
              Well, God be divine, Caesar’s Caesar’s, and locksmith’s

              Of course, only you seem to live in a monarchy, or do you have doubts about this?
              Quote: alicante11
              Or do you have a select few, don't you? are all equal on selection?

              Well, the favorites are with you, but with us
              President (former) - sits
              Ministers are sitting. Now the prime minister (former) will sit down.
              1. +2
                10 December 2015 14: 00
                Well, it's like in the old joke - Spoons were found, but the sediment remained


                Don't understand the analogy? Or do you mean that you accused someone of stealing the spoons, you were proved that they were not stolen, and from your false accusations there was sediment left?

                No, in my opinion if they planted one, then all the same. And then they don’t touch their own.


                Once again, if you don’t plant one, then you don’t need to plant others either? Those. you can not plant house thieves and pickpockets and rapists, etc.?

                Remember these words.


                I always remember them.

                Yes, so that I would understand. That with all things being equal - there is more equal


                And I am in the know. Also me, captain obvious :).

                Of course, only you seem to live in a monarchy, or do you have doubts about this?


                I live in the capitalist-oligarchic simulacrum of the state that occupied my homeland. Unfortunately, fighting this simulacrum is like cutting a cancerous tumor out of the brain at a time when well-wishers of all kinds are standing around with knives. But do not flatter yourself, you live in the same simulacra.

                President (former) - sits
                Ministers are sitting. Now the prime minister (former) will sit down.


                So this is not the president and not the prime minister, but the sixes that you put in order for you to think that you decide who to manage you.
                1. 0
                  10 December 2015 14: 35
                  Very interesting comments, especially the last two, more precisely, the logic itself is curious, in the first it was as if the Martians descended from heaven and captured, occupied, paralyzed, anyone "I'm not guilty, he came himself" (C), and you can't fight them "Don't rock the boat "(C) :-)
                  The second is even more surprising, if a retired official can be imprisoned for a crime, it means that he is not a real person "But the king is not real !!!" (C) :-)
                  1. +1
                    10 December 2015 15: 28
                    in the first, it was as if the Martians descended from heaven and captured, occupied, paralyzed, anyone "I am innocent, he came himself" (C)


                    I am "not guilty", I was 91 years old in 13st.

                    and you can't fight them "Don't rock the boat" (С) :-)


                    Do you have a recipe on how to free your homeland and at the same time prevent its death from external influences? And also there is a program, what to do after liberation and is there the power to put this program into effect?

                    The second is even more surprising, if a retired official can be imprisoned for a crime, it means that he is not a real person "But the king is not real !!!" (C) :-)


                    What's so strange? If a person is honest, then there is nothing to plant him. If he is not honest, then, being in power at the level of the prime minister or president, he will do so to protect himself from retaliation. If he could not do this, then he didn’t have real power, and, therefore, he was a screen, six of real rulers.
                    1. 0
                      10 December 2015 16: 52
                      Quote: alicante11
                      Do you have a recipe on how to free your homeland and at the same time prevent its death from external influences? And also there is a program, what to do after liberation and is there the power to put this program into effect?

                      It was already everything in history ..., an idea is introduced, usually a society of social justice, and it has gone and gone since the time of Spartak
                2. +1
                  10 December 2015 15: 12
                  Khodorkovsky is just as "mean and cowardly" as many of our so-called liberals who feed on cookies from the US State Department and open their mouths to throw out another portion of hatred on Russia when they are ordered to do so.
                  And the fact that atalef protects him is nothing strange.
                  - Firstly, he is a Jew, like Khovorkovsky
                  - secondly, people of this kind who hate our country all "stand" for each other. In short - one gang only the level of atalef is naturally much lower.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +1
            10 December 2015 13: 16
            By the way, atalef, I copied your forecast for Assad, we’ll see how you turn around when February comes, and Assad will be in place.
            1. 0
              10 December 2015 13: 27
              Quote: alicante11
              By the way, atalef, I copied your forecast for Assad, we’ll see how you turn around when February comes, and Assad will be in place.

              No problem.
            2. 0
              10 December 2015 13: 27
              Quote: alicante11
              By the way, atalef, I copied your forecast for Assad, we’ll see how you turn around when February comes, and Assad will be in place.

              No problem.
          4. +1
            10 December 2015 13: 46
            Atafel, you have lived so much in Russia, but apparently you didn’t understand Russian Civilization. In the West (including Israel) lawfully = fair. For example, they can take an old woman’s house for a debt of $ 1. And this is normal, because According to law. Therefore, you do not understand the indignation. In your opinion: he gave the word, he took the word. And here we have the word of an honest man stronger than the press in the contract.
            1. 0
              10 December 2015 14: 02
              In your opinion: he gave the word, he took the word. And here we have the word of an honest man stronger than the press in the contract.


              It is among the people, but the elite and successful capitalists in our country are quite similar to Westerners.
      9. 0
        10 December 2015 23: 48
        Quote: atalef
        You know, this is your statement, it says only one thing that Khodorkovsky sat for politics, not for embezzlement. If he sat for embezzlement (like any citizen of Russia), then no one has the right to forbid him (after serving his term or pardon) to engage in political If the Constitution was written for all citizens of Russia except Khodorkovsky? Let us all the same separate the flies from the cutlets. All these statements by Bystyrkin and Peskov look not just ridiculous, but miserable. I do not make a saint out of Khodor - they all stole. they steal even under the current government and no less than him. He at least (unlike most) term of 18 (in my years) rewound. But for the authorities. for some reason he is much more dangerous than Serdyukov and Ko - who stole no less. but not a day in prison. They were afraid of him, apparently not in vain, otherwise they would not have bothered so much on him.


        How many nonsense right away, Israeli.
        He sat for embezzlement, and wanted to engage in politics then and now, although he promised not to get into it, the Constitution had nothing to do with it. Everyone stole, but not everyone killed, or rather, ordered those who prevented stealing. Yes, and not everyone stole. And no one is afraid of him in power, the character of the revolution in Russia is too small to arrange. This is already a year after his imprisonment he is trying to remind himself.
  4. +1
    10 December 2015 06: 42
    the murder of a person for Mikhail Borisovich is a “dull” topic, and, therefore, ordinary ... They say that there would be something to discuss ... You think, murder ...

    Indeed, all the big business in Russia in the 90s was mountains of corpses. And what, someone does not know about it, or does not want to know. Why pretend to be small children, this disgusting phenomenon is based on the fantastic states of quite a few. I remember the 91st year, when a high-ranking official "kicks out" from the 30th floor. So what? All calmly pass by this fact and believe that this official is "tortured by conscience." And this is just one example.
  5. +2
    10 December 2015 06: 49
    Lenin from Hodor will not work ... the scale is not the same! Hodorishka is not a "giant of thought" at all, but just a raider from the 90s ... and judging by the fact that he served 10 years - not the most "talented";) the same BAB (and not only!) Managed to get out of Russia and avoid punishment
    so this is all fiction ...
    1. +1
      10 December 2015 10: 29
      Quote: Russian Uzbek
      the same BAB (and not only!) managed to get out of Russia and avoid punishment
      so this is all fiction ...


      BAB managed to "get out of Russia", but he failed to avoid "punishment", however.
      MBKh, too, "dangerously tears the rubber band," after all, it can fly into the return line.
    2. 0
      10 December 2015 10: 53
      Hodor is not Lenin or Trotsky. More likely a Japanese bear or "hunchback".
      1. +2
        10 December 2015 11: 58
        Quote: Balu
        Hodor is not Lenin or Trotsky. More likely a Japanese bear or "hunchback".


        Limonov correctly said that it was time for Khodorkovsky to hide, and not to make statements.
  6. +1
    10 December 2015 07: 02
    A hodor hangs out, hangs himself on a drawstring in the toilet, and no one investigates. An accident. So it goes down in history as a corrupt one.
  7. +1
    10 December 2015 07: 06
    An ice ax on a revolutionary little girl!
    1. +1
      10 December 2015 08: 06
      I fully support, but before that ... With his feet, his feet !!! am
  8. +3
    10 December 2015 07: 26
    Lesson for the future. Before you pardon, consider all the options. So it turned out that they pardoned themselves for "joy" and for the sake of the west. And now, at least, he’d filled with his subpoenas — the train was gone, and there would still be much harm.
  9. +1
    10 December 2015 07: 34
    after a pardon by the president, he announced that he would never, ever even think about political activity, was noted by publications on the “Kremlin regime” almost on an ongoing basis... So believe after that liu ... eeeee ... oligarchs ... The oligarch is the leader of the revolutionary forces ... The bee is against honey ...
  10. +1
    10 December 2015 07: 53
    We have such a lot. Our gn .. we run west and complain that they are offended. If now we take all the thieves of sawmills, tinkers, bribe takers for ... well, then they together will pull the West and there they will tell how they were prevented from stealing. They are the bearers of democracy and they are not doing so well. Such s..and have always been and always will be.
  11. 0
    10 December 2015 08: 07
    HIM cries on it
    1. +1
      10 December 2015 08: 13
      why are you so about a partner?
  12. +1
    10 December 2015 08: 11
    Well, what a revolution, no ideas other than changing one figure in power to another, that's why you are in full swing, do you understand the candidate :-)
  13. +1
    10 December 2015 08: 19
    maybe there are "well-wishers" who will help him hang on a tie? feel or a handkerchief, as his longtime friend was hanged in England? good
  14. 0
    10 December 2015 08: 51
    In the suitcase, in the homeland by diplomatic mail and in Matrosskaya Tishina. The revolution is over.
  15. +1
    10 December 2015 09: 13
    This is not an agenda, this is a black mark. Glued to the forehead, mainly on brilliant green.
  16. +1
    10 December 2015 10: 01
    I can’t make out the terminology; what is MBH? I know the MPH, but the MBH? Little Pale X ...?
    Sorry of course, but what is the subject, such is the object feel
  17. 0
    10 December 2015 10: 28
    Quote: atalef
    Based on what article of the constitution. is it forbidden for a person who has served his term and pardoned by presidential decree to participate in political life?

    The word to keep in Russia was worth a lot, but not for people like Khodorkovsky. Formally, it is not forbidden to participate in political life, but they tried to negotiate with him. Indeed, they put him in prison for politics, but he still didn’t understand anything and again crawls into the same kaku. He is just not a simple sinner, but an oligarch who climbed into politics. And he could have broken quite a few firewood. In the subject of struggle with the oligarchs, he was perhaps the hardest nut to crack. The question was the survival of Russia. The MBH is a very tough leader and if he had not been stopped in any way, they would have gotten at least a flaw from Yugoslavia, or even worse than Ukraine. He was allowed to leave Russia, but he climbed on a baby. Now it is less dangerous, and Russia has become stronger. But it can still be raked, if it does not calm down.
    1. 0
      10 December 2015 10: 46
      Quote: eugraphus
      but tried to negotiate with him

      Helmut Schmidt agreed with Vladimir Putin, I have little idea of ​​Khodorkovsky to come to an agreement, his release is such an indicative test of contractibility
      1. -5
        10 December 2015 10: 59
        Quote: sa-ag
        Helmut Schmidt agreed with Vladimir Putin

        is it consistent with the constitution?
        Quote: sa-ag
        his release is such an indicative test of contractibility

        law that drawbar.
      2. 0
        10 December 2015 10: 59
        Quote: sa-ag
        Helmut Schmidt agreed with Vladimir Putin

        is it consistent with the constitution?
        Quote: sa-ag
        his release is such an indicative test of contractibility

        law that drawbar.
        1. 0
          10 December 2015 11: 16
          Quote: atalef
          is it consistent with the constitution?

          I don’t know, a private person, as a representative of big business and government, comes on an unofficial visit for, let's say, consultations, the result of the visit is the release of the prisoner, and it turned out that at first there was a decree on release, and then an appeal for clemency appeared, a murky story
  18. -1
    10 December 2015 10: 34
    Well, Lenin, too, did not draw a special light from the revolution, but with the help of very specific foreign capital he was able to destroy the empire, albeit very decrepit.
  19. 0
    10 December 2015 10: 47
    Yes, 52 billion US dollars is a good reason for initiating a criminal case and all subsequent actions of our current leaders, right up to the organization of tea drinking with polonium, or another accident.
    It is clear that our leaders will not get this money from our chests, but will introduce additional taxes. But even this money could belong to them! And now we need to give Khodorkovsky - very disappointing. It turns out that he raped everyone, here's a poop!
    I believe that the idea that unfolds before our eyes with the adoption by the State Duma in all readings on the same day of the law on the supremacy of domestic norms over international standards is worth the money .... But, as they say, the train has already left - it’s too late to wave fists after the fight.
    So, the recent assumptions of some site visitors that we will never hear about Khodorkovsky again have not come true. We will hear more.
  20. 0
    10 December 2015 11: 00
    Please note: when Khodorkovsky was sitting, the dollar was 30 rubles, in Ukraine - peace and order, with Europe and the USA - friendship, crazy reserves, oil - $ 100. per barrel. And when he was released, it all started. Put him in commercials for ... twenty years, maybe everything will work out.
  21. +1
    10 December 2015 12: 05
    It is strange why there is still no revolution in the state of Israel. Everyone is so smart there!
  22. 0
    10 December 2015 12: 10
    "On November 28, Vladimir Putin signed a law granting Irina Vladimirovna citizenship of the Russian Federation."
    I want to correct Alexei a little: citizenship is granted by a presidential decree, and not by law.

    Atalef, as an adherent of the Russian Constitution, in the process of discussion calls on citizens to address this act. It is sad that citizens did not even bother to look at its text. Less to us. But I would have taken up casuistry on this subject, starting, for example, with restrictions on constitutional rights in the context of Khodorkovsky’s appeals. We look at the norms of part 3 of article 17 and part 3 of article 55 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      10 December 2015 12: 21
      Quote: Monastic
      Atalef, as an adherent of the Russian Constitution, in the process of discussion calls on citizens to address this act. It is sad that citizens did not even bother to look at its text. Less to us. But I would have taken up casuistry on this subject, starting, for example, with restrictions on constitutional rights in the context of Khodorkovsky’s appeals. We look at the norms of part 3 of article 17

      What is your interpretation of part 3?
      Article 17

      1. In the Russian Federation, human and civil rights and freedoms are recognized and guaranteed in accordance with generally accepted principles and norms of international law and in accordance with this Constitution.

      2. Fundamental human rights and freedoms are inalienable and belong to everyone from birth.

      3. The exercise of the rights and freedoms of a person and citizen must not violate the rights and freedoms of others.

      Article 55

      1. The enumeration in the Constitution of the Russian Federation of fundamental rights and freedoms shall not be construed as a denial or derogation of other universally recognized human and civil rights and freedoms.

      2. No laws shall be enacted in the Russian Federation that abrogate or derogate the rights and freedoms of man and citizen.

      3. The rights and freedoms of man and citizen may be limited by federal law only to the extent necessary to protect the foundations of the constitutional order, morality, health, rights and legitimate interests of others, to ensure the defense of the country and the security of the state

      By federal law and by court order --- right?
      So how about this?
      So what's in the constitution?
      1. 0
        10 December 2015 14: 35
        I apologize for the silence, Net crashes.

        The norm of part 3 of article 17 implies an elementary interpretation: the rights and freedoms of one restrict the rights and freedoms of the other.

        Under Part 3 of Art. 55, a simple "link" emerges in relation to the call for a "revolution" - through the Federal Law "On Counteracting Extremist Activity" to Article 280 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Those. "by federal law and by court order" - that's right.
    3. +2
      10 December 2015 14: 48
      Quote: Monastic
      citizenship is granted by decree of the President, and not by law


      Thanks for the helpful tip. Of course, decree.
  23. 0
    10 December 2015 12: 32
    Bitten. Who bites such people)))
  24. 0
    10 December 2015 13: 00
    Khodorkovsky apparently believes that it is not necessary to keep a word for Putin, because Putin is halachically a stupid animal for the Jews to be reckoned with. Well, soon the hell will find out who cheated :)
  25. 0
    10 December 2015 13: 32
    This is not Khodorkovsky, but the Hobbit Kovsky, the brother of Smumg's holum ... From there, all of him and vulgarity ...
  26. 0
    10 December 2015 15: 02
    At the end of the speech, Khodorkovsky clearly needed at least a small armored car, for how can such words be uttered without an armored car:


    An excellent phrase about an armored car, but how really is a revolution without an armored car. Of course, Khodorkovsky is far from Lenin, so more armored cars are needed. laughing
  27. 0
    10 December 2015 16: 49
    I don’t understand what but
    Further, Michal Borisych, clearly wounded by the very agenda in the RF Central Administration, collected everything he remembered: the “remnants of the reserve”, the “Chaek case”, the struggle for the right to a peaceful picket, and the “inner circle” Kadyrova ", and even, oh horror! about the Russian mafia in Spain ... This is the scope: from Chechnya to the Iberian ranges. Well, isn't this wide man Mr Khodorkovsky? And then ...

    I had to write completely.
  28. 0
    10 December 2015 17: 36
    A thief should sit in jail! You understand how much fun it is from the rostrum, but which one, to hell with Lenin, is a mongrel, so let him cackle in the zone, from great and strong love lol
  29. +1
    10 December 2015 18: 01
    Well, how much do you need to be inadequate so that of all the oligarchs they planted you? There are two options - 1 stupidity (but this one does not fit, it seems to be not stupid) 2 - go overboard in a stump. And this animal still allows itself to reason about power, and even down.
  30. 0
    10 December 2015 21: 08
    I would like to know the prospects of publishing such a piece of paper for individual high-ranking law enforcement officials and no less high-ranking Class A officials
  31. 0
    12 December 2015 14: 43
    One thing surprises me - they released this bastard from prison - go to your Israel and sit quietly "like a mouse." No, this Jew-mason again barks at Russia, where he lived comfortably, fed and parasitized. He is "summoned" to court to answer for mokruha, and he sits in his ethnic homeland and laughs. The following law must be adopted in Russia:
    1) if any state refuses to extradite a person (regardless of his citizenship) who is under criminal prosecution for what was committed on the territory of Russia or against a citizen of Russia, the Russian special services have the right to forcibly deliver such a person to the territory of Russia (not necessarily immediately to "itself Russia ", for a start, you can go to your small homeland -" to the territory "of Russia - includes the diplomatic mission, the Russian ship, and the airliner)
    2) a person (regardless of his citizenship), who was convicted in absentia by the Russian court for a crime committed, is subject to unconditional removal to the territory of Russia to serve his sentence;
    3) a person (regardless of his citizenship) who has been convicted in absentia by the Russian court for a crime committed to capital punishment is subject to unconditional export to the territory of Russia for the execution of the sentence, and if it is impossible to export the sentence, the sentence is executed at the place of "actual stay" faces.
    AND DON'T HESITATE - ISRAELTS DON'T HESITATE, USA DO NOT HESITATE. It is from these countries that we need to take the example of Russian lawmakers.

    Then no London and Israelis will help such Jewish Masons as Khodorkovsky. They will know that "the long arms of Russian justice will clench on their necks" at any location in the world. For example, as was the case with the Jewish Mason Leiba Bronstein-Trotsky. A man came "from Moscow" and eliminated the bastard who made a coup d'etat in Russia in 1917 for the money of the Jewish Masons from the United States, who was the ideologue of the Red Terror, which cost the Russian people a million victims, and who wanted, but failed, to sell Russia and turn it into a US colony, and Russian people into slaves.

    And one more important norm must be adopted - in Russia it is necessary to introduce "one citizenship". Those. a person who is a citizen of Russia cannot simultaneously be a citizen of another state or have a residence permit in another state. And a person automatically loses Russian citizenship upon acquiring citizenship of another state.
    And then such "Khodorkovskie and Berezovskie" are accustomed to - having Russian citizenship they parasitize in Russia, and to "escape" they also have an Israeli passport (as a rule, but not always, they can have a Swiss, etc.) passport in order to immediately flee to their ethnic homeland, which "does not issue".

    So, if so, the Khodorkovskys will sit quietly, like mice under a broom and wake up in a cold sweat even thousands of kilometers from Russia - and suddenly "experts from the NKVD" will come for him.