Military Review

Sergey Lavrov answered the question about the possibility of using nuclear weapons against DAISH

94
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov commented on the question of whether Russia intends to use the DAISH (ISIL) nuclear against terrorists weapon. According to the head of Russian diplomacy, the terrorist structure, which is DAISH, can be defeated by ordinary means. Statement by Sergei Lavrov leads channel LifeNews:


There is no need to use any nuclear weapons against terrorists, they can be dealt with by conventional military means, and this is fully consistent with our doctrine.


Sergey Lavrov answered the question about the possibility of using nuclear weapons against DAISH


Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called the DAISh militants the absolute enemies of mankind and once again called on countries to unite in the framework of a general anti-terrorist coalition. RIA News cites the statement of the Russian minister:

We believe that this task is very real. In the end, it was realistic to unite against absolute evil, such as Nazism, during the Second World War, and succeeded in defeating it, setting aside all differences, including ideological differences, which, unlike the current era, then, of course, shared the Soviet Union and Western countries. But all this was put aside as a secondary, non-existential value. The main thing was to prevent the Nazis from seizing the world with their misanthropic ideology. Now the same misanthropic ideals are preached by the so-called "Islamic State", which cannot be allowed to become a state and which must be deprived of any illusions that they can associate themselves with Islam. These are the absolute enemies of humanity, and as such they need to be considered.


Meanwhile, information about the growing number of contradictions in the ranks of the militants of the so-called "Islamic state" and other major terrorist groups comes from Syria. In the ranks of the terrorists, the level of a kind of paranoia is growing, when they consider each other “agents of the Syrian special services”, introduced to loosen the DAISH structure itself. Any reason to doubt the loyalty of terrorist "ideals" is regarded as a betrayal, and the "traitor" is executed without any special proceedings. At the same time, the number of “traitors” can be reached the next day by someone who himself executed another “traitor” the day before
Photos used:
http://function.mil.ru/
94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Teberii
    Teberii 9 December 2015 14: 53 New
    28
    Chasing flies with a bat, to whom it only occurred to me.
    1. oldseaman1957
      oldseaman1957 9 December 2015 14: 59 New
      +6
      Quote: Teberii
      Chasing flies with a bat, to whom it only occurred to me.

      - Well, yes, like a sparrow from a gun ... Here, most importantly, deal with the "sponsors".
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 9 December 2015 15: 02 New
        -37
        Isn't the bombing the same?
        1. Teberii
          Teberii 9 December 2015 15: 06 New
          +9
          No, you don’t want to turn the half of the world into a lifeless desert, and if the Americans are still connected, they are light carcasses.
          1. _Vladislav_
            _Vladislav_ 9 December 2015 15: 15 New
            +9
            Quote: Teberii
            Chasing flies with a bat, to whom it only occurred to me.

            This of course is understandable, by itself ......

            And on the other hand, once you see a nuclear mushroom in the distance - you forget your name, you forget all the prayers from the Koran. The ideals of igil immediately cease to be significant, immediately cease to remember that there was some kind of idea.

            Awareness, only the awareness of the whole horror of being, gives such an effect. Whatever hardcore terrorist you are, this cannot be avoided. Remember the video as a suicide bomber getting into a car before that, tears shed. Sastzal however, winter-winter is not iron.

            PS
            Only one psychological factor about the use of such weapons immediately aligns all indicators. Oil will skyrocket and the dollar will fall. And your tangerines, cheaper for the new year.
            1. Lukich
              Lukich 9 December 2015 15: 25 New
              15
              Quote: _Vladislav_
              And on the other hand, once seeing a nuclear mushroom in the distance

              Well, where to grow this "mushroom"? Do terrorists have a specific address? or immediately in Syria? or lebanon? are there all terrorists?
              1. _Vladislav_
                _Vladislav_ 9 December 2015 15: 28 New
                +3
                Quote: Lukich
                Well, where to grow this "mushroom"? Do terrorists have a specific address? or immediately in Syria? or lebanon? are there all terrorists?

                Yes, that's all. I do not call.
                I am analyzing the likely consequences of using such weapons.
                It is clear that the use of nuclear weapons is not included in the plans of the Russian Defense Ministry. At least by igil.
              2. attuda
                attuda 9 December 2015 15: 54 New
                +1
                Well, where to grow this "mushroom"?


                Nowhere to go.
                There, without a core, there are mushrooms ready for dusting and spraying in a variety of ways all that survived in the desert ...



                And it is better to burn Solntsebom in reactors.
                It’s useful to anyone, or rather nobody ...
                if...?
                1. Lukich
                  Lukich 9 December 2015 16: 26 New
                  +4
                  Quote: attuda
                  There, without a core, there are mushrooms ready for dusting and spraying in a variety of ways all that survived in the desert ...

                  1. Zoldat_A
                    Zoldat_A 9 December 2015 16: 53 New
                    +6
                    Quote: Lukich
                    Quote: attuda
                    There, without a core, there are mushrooms ready for dusting and spraying in a variety of ways all that survived in the desert ...

                    Quote: Lukich
                    RBC-500 Air Bomb - ISIS felt the BOMB POWER on itself
                    How do the bearded communicate with each other? Do they understand each other? Of the three words in a row, two are "Allahu akbar." Our pilot was killed - "Allahakbar", bombs are falling on them - again, "Allahakbar"! Do they have any other words in their language? I have enough experience in dealing with Muslims - both positive and ... different, but that I didn’t hear this at Allahakbar! Only intonation changes. And so - for all occasions ...
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. Lukich
                      Lukich 9 December 2015 17: 11 New
                      +7
                      Quote: Zoldat_A
                      How do the bearded communicate with each other? Do they understand each other? Of the three words in a row, two are "Allahu akbar."

                      Yes, and we have some through the word math remat laughing
              3. the most important
                the most important 9 December 2015 16: 27 New
                +1
                Quote: Lukich
                Quote: _Vladislav_
                And on the other hand, once seeing a nuclear mushroom in the distance

                Well, where to grow this "mushroom"? Do terrorists have a specific address? or immediately in Syria? or lebanon? are there all terrorists?

                there are many places where you can get by mistake ... Qatar or Saudis ... (just kidding ...)
            2. Georgy USSR
              Georgy USSR 9 December 2015 15: 38 New
              +1
              A level of peculiar paranoia is growing in the ranks of terrorists when they consider each other “agents of the Syrian special services”, introduced to undermine the very structure of Daesh. Any reason to doubt allegiance to terrorist "ideals" is regarded as treason, and the "traitor" is executed without any special proceedings. Moreover, the next day, the one who executed another "traitor" on the eve ...

              They start the year 1937 laughing
              1. cniza
                cniza 9 December 2015 16: 32 New
                +3
                Quote: George of the USSR

                They start the year 1937 laughing


                More reminiscent of the Middle Ages, and paranoia at all times it is the same.
              2. The comment was deleted.
            3. veksha50
              veksha50 9 December 2015 15: 40 New
              +2
              Quote: _Vladislav_
              Only one psychological factor about the use of such weapons immediately aligns all indicators. Oil will skyrocket and the dollar will fall. And your tangerines, cheaper for the new year.



              I did not expect such a comment, Vladislav ...

              And try to approach from the other side: the application of tactical nuclear weapons - this will already create a precedent, and, thus, will not only untie the hands of the United States ...

              Tomorrow, for example, India and Pakistan will begin to treat each other with vigorous loaves, the day after tomorrow - Israel Arabs ... One has only to start ...

              PS The USA bombed Japan for only one reason: no one in the world had such weapons anymore ... And now nuclear weapons are spread, despite the Non-Proliferation Treaty, like fleas on a mutt dog ...

              And the barmalei who survived in other countries will begin to blow up dirty bombs everywhere in retaliation and use chemical. and tank. weapons ... Fun on Earth will ...
              1. _Vladislav_
                _Vladislav_ 9 December 2015 15: 43 New
                0
                Quote: veksha50
                And the barmalei who survived in other countries will begin to blow up dirty bombs everywhere in retaliation and use chemical. and tank. weapons ... Fun on Earth will ...

                Take it easy. I do not agitate.
                1. veksha50
                  veksha50 9 December 2015 16: 05 New
                  +2
                  Quote: _Vladislav_
                  Take it easy. I do not agitate.



                  Yes, I’m so calm ... I just didn’t expect from you, that's all ...
                  1. _Vladislav_
                    _Vladislav_ 9 December 2015 16: 18 New
                    -2
                    Quote: veksha50

                    Yes, I’m so calm ... I just didn’t expect from you, that's all ...

                    and thoughts then what?) winked
                    1. veksha50
                      veksha50 9 December 2015 21: 48 New
                      +1
                      Quote: _Vladislav_
                      and thoughts then what?)



                      Hmm ... Are you trying to prevent me from expressing my thoughts and my opinion out loud?
            4. your1970
              your1970 9 December 2015 19: 02 New
              0
              "Awareness, just the awareness of the horror of being, gives such an effect. No matter how hard-burned a terrorist you are, you can’t avoid this. Remember the video as a suicide bomber getting into a car before that, it shed tears. Sastzal however, winter-winter is not iron."

              you yourself and contradict, the terrorist cried, but got into the car and went to explode ..
              DO NOT STOP IT.
              So here, you can start waving nuclear weapons only when there is an edge over the abyss ...
              1. _Vladislav_
                _Vladislav_ 9 December 2015 19: 44 New
                0
                Quote: your1970
                So here, you can start waving nuclear weapons only when there is an edge over the abyss ...

                Edge over the abyss, but what is it? This is when the trident will already be above your head. Or when a terrorist brings a knife to your throat.

                NF is not millet a threatening word - it is a function. Opportunity.
        2. Tanker55
          Tanker55 9 December 2015 15: 20 New
          -2
          How did you get the marshal? We need to figure it out. For the first time, minus do not wait!
        3. AlexG83
          AlexG83 9 December 2015 15: 38 New
          +8
          Quote: Gardamir
          Isn't the bombing the same?

          Enough already to carry the blizzard about the "inefficiency" of aviation, and the saying "as if from a gun on sparrows" is already beginning to annoy, can you suggest using muskets in a bayonet?
          1. Gardamir
            Gardamir 9 December 2015 16: 28 New
            +1
            Enough already to carry the blizzard about the "inefficiency" of aviation, and the saying "as if from a gun on sparrows" is already beginning to annoy, can you suggest using muskets in a bayonet?
            Strange American aircraft constantly bomb peaceful villages, better not with muskets, better with crossbows.
      2. Reserve officer
        Reserve officer 9 December 2015 16: 00 New
        +2
        And why did the question of nuclear weapons arise at all? Who and for what reason asked him?
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 9 December 2015 15: 03 New
      +3
      Quote: Teberii
      to whom it only occurred to me.

      It seems like an Italian (clown) journalist asked a question, although I could be wrong.
    3. 79807420129
      79807420129 9 December 2015 15: 11 New
      14
      If in fact they would have united, they would have driven all the barmales into the land long ago, but in Syria we are really working, and this mattress coalition is only bombing excavators, and oil is being stolen from Syria and Iraq.
    4. akmalinin
      akmalinin 9 December 2015 15: 23 New
      +3
      The actual use of new weapons in the place of firing ranges is better than training shooting and use.
    5. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 9 December 2015 15: 32 New
      +4
      Now even schoolchildren are aware of the consequences of nuclear weapons.
      And its application can only be desired by masochists.
      At the moment, it effectively performs the role of only "horror stories."
      1. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 9 December 2015 20: 58 New
        0
        Now even schoolchildren are aware of the consequences of nuclear weapons.
        Sorry for the directness, but now the schoolchildren do not know a damn thing. There is no such subject in school (NVP is called). I don’t think that more than 1 out of 200 can name the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion or list the classes of toxic substances. Or what a bomb shelter looks like and how to get out of it if the main entrance is littered with debris. And other things that in my time every schoolboy knew.
    6. Tor5
      Tor5 9 December 2015 16: 54 New
      0
      Not only possible, but also necessary - primarily overseas patrons who have nurtured this "miracle"
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. kodxnumx
      kodxnumx 9 December 2015 17: 50 New
      0
      There and the road to them! In HELL.
    9. YARUSSIAN39
      YARUSSIAN39 9 December 2015 21: 39 New
      0
      Unless only against their sponsors and owners of nuclear weapons to apply ... winked wassat
  2. Penetrator
    Penetrator 9 December 2015 14: 54 New
    19
    The main terrorists are only nuclear weapons and you get it. They sit quietly across the ocean ...
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 9 December 2015 15: 49 New
      -2
      Quote: Penetrator
      The main terrorists are only nuclear weapons and you get it. They sit quietly across the ocean ...

      For God's sake, at least look at the VIKI what the Perimeter system is or the guaranteed retaliatory strike system in Russia and the USA, and then think, do we all need guaranteed nuclear dust on the whole earth? Therefore, Americans are fighting over their missile defense to bypass the Perimeter system.
      1. Penetrator
        Penetrator 9 December 2015 16: 24 New
        +2
        What am I proposing to bomb America? Just stating a fact - the Americans are well settled, including, in view of their geographical location. Conventional methods of warfare are absolutely not afraid of them.
        And you tell me: "Perimeter, PRO, Wiki ...". Carefully delve into the comment text smile
        Ps Judging by the profile picture, are you a POVshnik? Or am I mistaken?
  3. sever.56
    sever.56 9 December 2015 14: 54 New
    +3
    You need to be a complete moron to think about the fact that Russia will use nuclear weapons against Daesh ...
    We are not the states that have long developed a nuclear strike plan on Russia. We use weapons in proportion to the existing threat. In this case, the usual is enough.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 9 December 2015 15: 00 New
      +4
      Quote: sever.56
      who have long developed a nuclear strike plan on Russia.

      And we are not on them? smile
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 9 December 2015 15: 04 New
      0
      Quote: sever.56
      We are not the states that have long developed a nuclear strike plan on Russia.

      No, well, seriously, don’t you think that ours sat all the way and looked at the rocket mines, with the thought - Well, the war will begin, we’ll apply it somewhere .... ???
      Everyone has plans - even small Brittons, have their own plan of war with America.
    3. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 9 December 2015 15: 13 New
      10
      Quote: sever.56
      We are not the states that have long developed a nuclear strike plan on Russia.

      Russia has a plan for a nuclear strike in the States. Another thing is the conditions for applying this plan. Missiles standing on alert await only the order to press the "red button". Each rocket is focused on a specific goal in the West, East or South.
      In addition, there is a second tier of missiles for an automatic retaliatory nuclear strike, when Russia's infrastructure is destroyed due to a sudden nuclear strike from enemies. This system is called the "Perimeter".
      So Russia long ago had a plan of a nuclear strike on Russia's enemies.
      We do not need to be considered white and fluffy fools surrounded by a wolf pack. And if not for this real plan of nuclear retaliation, then no one would have considered Russia for a long time and, for example, China and America would have conquered us.
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 9 December 2015 15: 52 New
        0
        Quote: Алексей_К
        Each rocket is focused on a specific goal in the West, East or South.



        Each mission has a flight mission entered into the control system in advance, and even the calculation does not know where it will fly ... One can only guess from the geographical location of the regiment division and the missile performance of the missile (minimum and maximum flight range) ... EVERYTHING !! !

        PS In principle, under the USSR, all R-12s and Pioneers located in Ukraine, in the Baltic states and the Smolensk-Leningrad regions, were aimed at Europe, and only at it ...
    4. veksha50
      veksha50 9 December 2015 15: 44 New
      +2
      Quote: sever.56
      We are not the states that have long developed a nuclear strike plan on Russia.



      Um ... Valera, yes, these plans have been developed by us for a long time already ...

      Here we are talking about the possibility of using TNW against the IG ... but this is not even stupidity, but what the hell ...
      1. sever.56
        sever.56 9 December 2015 15: 58 New
        +1
        Quote: veksha50
        , yes, these plans have been developed by us for a long time already ...

        Yes, George, I know that. Only the approach to the situation in which we can use nuclear weapons is different for us. I answered a little “comrade”, who accused me of stupidity, my vision of this problem. hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
  4. fregina1
    fregina1 9 December 2015 14: 54 New
    +7
    I do not agree with Lavrov .... against Qatar why not ....... winked
    1. max702
      max702 9 December 2015 15: 42 New
      0
      It is high time! True, there is a US base ...
  5. V.ic
    V.ic 9 December 2015 14: 55 New
    +8
    Cut off the financing of dushmans and they will fade like a weed with clipped roots. And "save the bomb" to save for game larger than these rodents.
  6. inkass_98
    inkass_98 9 December 2015 14: 56 New
    +6
    This is what a fool in the head substitute came up with a similar idea? You need to be completely brainless to use nuclear weapons for any reason.
    1. thinker
      thinker 9 December 2015 16: 35 New
      0
      Italian -
      On the eve of his visit to Rome, where an international meeting on Libya will be held on December 13, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov gave an interview to Italian media, in which he touched on a wide range of international and regional topics.

      http://www.rg.ru/2015/12/09/lavrov-site.html
  7. asadov
    asadov 9 December 2015 14: 56 New
    +4
    And how will the people of Iraq and Syria be happy about such a prospect ... Who could ever have such an idea? Complete nonsense.
  8. aleksejpill
    aleksejpill 9 December 2015 14: 58 New
    +1
    You can at the main base in Washington
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 9 December 2015 15: 57 New
      0
      Quote: aleksejpill
      You can at the main base in Washington


      It sounds provocative, it is evident that this is why the minuses are sculpted, however - it is tempting ...

      It is tempting for just one reason: as soon as Fushington is gone, I’m sure that on Earth it will become much more comfortable to live in peace and friendship ...

      PS However, besides him, there are still barmalei whom no one decree ... And about the possibility of this neurotic among journalists to bang on them and asked ...
      And if Fashington exists, as a goal, as a point on a map, then where and how to gather this wild crowd, to which country-Barmalevschina ?? To Qatar ??? Or in CA ???
      1. moreman71
        moreman71 9 December 2015 20: 25 New
        +1
        It’s hard to perceive the world as it is. Fight for the right to be under the sun, etc. But hoping that we will never crash and Fashington will and everyone will be happy is naive. In my opinion, this is a loser philosophy. . . . IMHO
  9. tomcat117
    tomcat117 9 December 2015 15: 00 New
    +5
    ... the next day, the one who himself executed another "traitor" on the eve may be among the "traitors" ...

    Something reminiscent of rats in a barrel eating each other!
    1. Conscience
      Conscience 9 December 2015 15: 10 New
      +1
      from the whole article - the most interesting.
  10. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 9 December 2015 15: 02 New
    12
    Sergey Lavrov answered the question about the possibility of using nuclear weapons against DAISH
  11. Mercenary
    Mercenary 9 December 2015 15: 04 New
    +4
    What kind of bullshit is asking such questions?
    Is Psaki out of maternity leave? Or maybe DUST like cockroaches? After defeating Daesh, normal people will live there. fool
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. DMoroz
      DMoroz 9 December 2015 15: 14 New
      +1
      Yes, it’s clear that the United States’s singers are probing the soil on an object not yours not ours. As they smell fried in the Middle East, I think they can also use nuclear weapons to prevent anyone from getting such a bold piece. They then because of the puddle does not matter
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 9 December 2015 21: 22 New
        0
        Well, there will be a thermonuclear explosion - only it, unlike pure plutonium, is pure - it will be possible to return in a month after the explosion.
    3. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 9 December 2015 15: 31 New
      +2
      Who is the Mercenary Zaminus? Man says business! Syria is a friendly country and this is their territory. What kind of crazy ideas? What yao?
  12. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 9 December 2015 15: 20 New
    +3
    If it were possible to drive all the Wahhabis into one place, somewhere, in the desert (and where there is no civilian population) - maybe it would make sense.

    But they are like a tumor; continuous metastases; already leaked to Afghanistan.
    1. Oberon812
      Oberon812 9 December 2015 15: 54 New
      0
      If it was possible to drive away - then it would be possible to gasp thermobaric. There are less consequences for nature.
  13. Batia
    Batia 9 December 2015 15: 24 New
    +5
    Citizens forum users! Nonsense about the use of nuclear weapons in a local conflict can be born in a stoned stupid head. Even to discuss uninteresting.
  14. rom8726
    rom8726 9 December 2015 15: 25 New
    +1
    my absolutely useless comment on an absolutely useless article
  15. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 9 December 2015 15: 28 New
    +1
    Weapons of mass destruction are used when other resources are exhausted! So it has been so far! But due to the fact that bombs or missiles with nuclear warheads began to decrease in size, the implementation of such weapons will be reviewed in relation to regional conflicts. But this is in the future. Now it is only possible at the risk of losing your country .
  16. ArcanAG
    ArcanAG 9 December 2015 15: 29 New
    +1
    What nuclear weapons, what nonsense. Only infect the territory.
    What kind of objects are ISIS such that they cannot be taken out without nuclear strikes?
  17. prishelec
    prishelec 9 December 2015 15: 29 New
    0
    Interestingly, and who asked such a question - the use of nuclear weapons,))) many peaceful people will die - they will die anyway, never mind what "we" are bloodthirsty,)) I would like to look at this - \ human \.))
  18. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 9 December 2015 15: 34 New
    +3
    “If you do not want to hear a stupid answer, do not ask a stupid question” (Ancient Roman proverb). Therefore, I will not say anything.
  19. Yak-3P
    Yak-3P 9 December 2015 15: 36 New
    0
    Here is the Bosphorus to expand so yes ... but for the broads of women to beat such a dandy ??
  20. NDA
    NDA 9 December 2015 15: 42 New
    +2
    Any reason to doubt allegiance to terrorist "ideals" is regarded as treason, and the "traitor" is executed without any special proceedings. Moreover, the next day, the one who executed another "traitor" on the eve ...


    That would be such a disease - an infection of the Armed Forces soldiers!
  21. akmalinin
    akmalinin 9 December 2015 15: 42 New
    0
    Quote: aleksejpill
    You can at the main base in Washington

    First you need to securely close your territory from the otvetka.
  22. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 9 December 2015 15: 42 New
    0
    Lavrov had to answer, but in plain text - "you, what stupid people ???". Another provocation, escalating the situation around Russia, the "aggressor" can use nuclear weapons !!! It’s time for some “comrades” across the ocean to understand that they will fly first of all into their insolent faces. and Russia will have enough forces to cope with the rest without nuclear weapons. Empire of lies / striped penguins / it's time to understand that the Russian has the same limit of patience !!!!
  23. Sergey Vladimirovich
    Sergey Vladimirovich 9 December 2015 15: 51 New
    0
    The use of nuclear weapons in itself is already a bitumen! For anyone! Anyone who asks these questions has no idea what he is asking !!! The impression is like an unreasonable child ... Actually ...
    1. Bully
      Bully 9 December 2015 17: 35 New
      0
      Quote: Sergey Vladimirovich
      The use of nuclear weapons in itself is already a bitumen! For anyone! Anyone who asks these questions has no idea what he is asking !!! The impression is like an unreasonable child ... Actually ...

      Talk madness ?! Perhaps, on the contrary, the lack of a clear answer through nuclear weapons, for example, to possible aggression by Turkey towards our group in Syria, should be considered madness? Or is there a ghostly hope of quickly defeating the Turks with conventional weapons? I have no such hope, but there is an understanding of a long bloody war in which at least our facilities and the population in the Caucasus can seriously suffer. I'm not talking about the group itself in Syria (VKS base and ships).
  24. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 9 December 2015 15: 56 New
    +2
    Nuclear weapons alone are a great thing. It is he who we must thank for 70 years of peace (the aggressive war against Russia in 1992-1999 is a separate conversation). Relatively inexpensive and effective. Amertsians can inflate the military budget to a trillion dollars, but as long as warheads are napping in the trunks of missile mines, Russia will exist as a single strong state and there will be no unipolar world. So let them doze, for the time being.

    And with the Wahhabi partisans we can somehow cope without extremal. Bomb the oil fields; introduce the death penalty as a punishment for buying artifacts, and the Islamic State itself will be bent (it will shrink to the size of a dangerous group, but without any attributes of statehood, such as territory).
  25. silver_roman
    silver_roman 9 December 2015 15: 59 New
    -1
    I propose to relocate all this rabble ISIS to the territory of Turkey and then already apply nuclear weapons soldier
    just two hares in the furnace !!!
  26. iouris
    iouris 9 December 2015 16: 07 New
    0
    I can answer such questions: no, nuclear weapons are intended solely for attacking the United States, and not against its agents.
  27. yuriy55
    yuriy55 9 December 2015 16: 16 New
    +1
    There is no need to use any nuclear weapons against terrorists, they can be dealt with by conventional military means, and this is fully consistent with our doctrine.


    Still - smart, Sergey Viktorovich.

    IMHO. The restraining factor from application is more useful and, not so much the mutual understanding of the neighbors and partners in the blocs, as coordinated joint actions ... And, every time you have to explain and persuade ... what
  28. Belousov
    Belousov 9 December 2015 16: 19 New
    +2
    The journalist absolutely does not understand what he is asking, does not understand the destructive power of nuclear weapons and the consequences of their use fool And now we are being pushed to the same level of education. negative
  29. S-17
    S-17 9 December 2015 16: 27 New
    0
    Given that the Daesh Command is located in Washington, +/- it is not worth categorically rejecting the use of nuclear weapons ... you never know ...
    Sergey Viktorovich just didn’t finish a bit)))
  30. Uran
    Uran 9 December 2015 16: 32 New
    0
    could have been. in one fell swoop. but peaceful too
  31. afrikanez
    afrikanez 9 December 2015 16: 56 New
    0
    I wonder who just thought of asking such a question? Apparently some kind of nonsense! fool
  32. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 9 December 2015 17: 19 New
    +2
    England: Tyson Fury's words against homosexuality seek crime

    London, December 9 2015

    “There are only three things that need to be done for the devil to come to our house. To legitimize homosexuality, abortion and pedophilia, ”these words can lead Fury to the dock.



    “There are only three things that need to be done for the devil to come to our house. Legalize homosexuality, abortion and pedophilia. Who would have thought in the 1950 and 1960 years that the first two things would be legalized?

    Of course, my words about legitimizing pedophilia sound wild, but if I said about the legalization of homosexuality and abortion in the 50's, I would be considered crazy. If 120 years ago, I would tell you that the 1000-ton plane would fly across the sky, then I would look ridiculous as well, ”after these words said in an interview with the Daily Mail on 8 on November, there have been many changes in the life of the British boxer Tyson Fury .

    His statement was immediately called "a vile homophobic spot on British boxing." Today we are watching the development of this story.

    Absolute world heavyweight boxing champion Tyson Fury, who took away four championship belts from Wladimir Klitschko, lost his IBF world title one day and became a defendant in a police investigation because of his words in the interview we gave at the beginning .

    The reason for the check was a phone call made after the BBC television broadcast, during which Fury's words on homosexuality were discussed, the BBC reports.

    "We are extremely serious about hate crime allegations, so we’ll pay a visit to the person who called us to interview him and accept his written statement," said a spokesman for the Manchester police.

    After this written statement is made available to the police, a decision will be made whether to proceed with this case.

    In parallel with this scandal, it became known that Tyson Fury was deprived of the third major IBF title, which he took away from Wladimir Klitschko in late November.

    According to the terms of the championship, Fury was supposed to agree to meet with the mandatory applicant for the IBF title, Ukrainian Vyacheslav Glazkov. Instead, the 27-year-old Briton signed an agreement on a rematch with Klitschko.

    Fury officials have said they plan to appeal the IBF decision.

    9th of December 2015
    1. S-17
      S-17 9 December 2015 22: 56 New
      0
      Well, if they do find a “corpus delicti” in words, then maybe Fury, following Glazkov, will stand in line for the Russian passport)
  33. pvv113
    pvv113 9 December 2015 17: 34 New
    +1
    and the “traitor” executed without any special proceedings

    The more they kill each other, the cleaner the air will be and easier for us
  34. gukoyan
    gukoyan 9 December 2015 17: 39 New
    0
    But what a great idea I came up with, if you let the deza into the media that there really are agents from Syria, Iran and Iraq ... And to present this with information leak sauce, let the jackals cut each other)
  35. Denis 60 rus
    Denis 60 rus 9 December 2015 17: 40 New
    +1
    In the ranks of the terrorists, a level of peculiar paranoia rises, when they consider each other “agents of the Syrian special services,” remarkably, in my opinion. It is necessary for the Syrians to declare that they have every second there. third, etc. "agent", but louder, so surely the Ishilovites grappled with each other.
  36. PValery53
    PValery53 9 December 2015 17: 47 New
    0
    Combining the geographical area of ​​deserts with the biological is our task. Strategic Rocket Forces of Russia. "If the enemy is swarming POPEREK BATSKI, then leveling it is our next exercise."
  37. Old26
    Old26 9 December 2015 20: 03 New
    0
    The article is amiable in its essence (about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in the same Syria). This is madness. And no matter what type of nuclear weapon. Tactical or strategic. All talk of limited nuclear war is delusional in and of itself. Applying one charge, the parties will not stop. Such conversations - to calm the society, they say that we shoot 5 charges on the twentieth, they are the same for us, and then we will meet and agree on the non-use of nuclear weapons.

    And, comrades, do not be offended, but just like a docile and delusional article, just as dubious and delusional are all your proposals to strike at Washington, citing the fact that there is the headquarters of terrorism or to expand the Bosphorus.

    If you have suicidal tendencies, then try to leave this world alone, and do not drag a few billion people with you.

    For offering to strike a nuclear weapon at a country that has the same arsenal as our country, hoping that we will not receive anything in return - I apologize again, but you have to be a complete moron
  38. Old26
    Old26 9 December 2015 20: 38 New
    0
    Quote: Old26
    The article is amiable in its essence ...
    ... like D. ebilna and delusional article, so

    Sorry, of course, not an article, but an idea. Nuclear strike idea
  39. gammipapa
    gammipapa 9 December 2015 20: 50 New
    -1
    Never say never .
    And someone believed six months ago that the calibers would fly? white swans? Yes, not real.
    Zhirinovsky directly speaks of the use of nuclear weapons, one must play ahead of the curve and then there is nothing special to object to.


    The time I still think has not come, I need a reinforced concrete occasion and preparation.
  40. Alexdark
    Alexdark 10 December 2015 06: 01 New
    0
    It is impossible. Partners will never forget this later in their life. And over the years, they will rewrite that day so much that it turns out that we bombed Europe with the help of nuclear weapons ... They know how, do not be surprised.
  41. Old26
    Old26 10 December 2015 08: 58 New
    0
    Quote: gammipapa
    And someone believed six months ago that the calibers would fly? white swans? Yes, it’s not real. Zhirinovsky directly speaks of the use of nuclear weapons, you need to play ahead of the curve and then there’s nothing to object to.

    Do not confuse, as they say, God's gift with fried eggs. Local conflict with the use of conventional weapons is one thing, and nuclear conflict is another. And Zhirik, as he was, remained a yap, although he positions himself as a serious politician who has been in politics for almost 30 years.
    Play ahead of the curve in nuclear roulette ??? That, no matter what the lead, there will be one end. Nuclear pi ... q throughout civilization.
    The Americans, like us, have their own missile attack warning system with ground and space segments. The space segment will need 10-15 seconds after launch to fix the fact of a mass launch. And then there are well-established action protocols. And advancing will not give anything. Just another country (leading) will die 10-15 minutes later. But it will die anyway.

    This is because in relation to a country with 3-5 ICBMs, we can talk about being ahead of schedule, and not in relation to a country with 8 hundred strategic carriers only.

    No need to console yourself with the illusions that we will prepare and be a slap, and in return we won’t get anything ... Very dangerous illusions