Military Review

Iran is going to buy from Russia a party of T-90 tanks

58
The commander of the ground forces of Iran, Ahmad Reza Purdastan, announced the intention of the country's defense Ministry to purchase a batch of Russian for the Iranian army tanks T-90 According to him, Iranian military experts may be sent to Russia in the near future to sign the corresponding contracts. It is reported RIA News.


Iran is going to buy from Russia a party of T-90 tanks


Ahmad Reza Purdastan:
Our relations with Russia in the military-technical field have strengthened. And in this regard, the acquisition of Russian T-90 tanks is on the agenda. We hope that the relevant contracts will be concluded, and our specialists will go to Russia to gain experience in the operation of this modern technology.


What specific number of T-90 tanks that Iran is going to buy from Russia is in question - not yet reported.

Earlier, the Iranian authorities reported that deliveries of C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems began from Russia. Recall that earlier Russia decided not to supply complexes to Tehran, citing the adoption of the UN resolution, despite the conclusion of contracts and the fact that C-300 is difficult to attribute to offensive weapons. Namely offensive weapons UN resolution and forbade the supply to Iran. Now, C-300 Russia’s air defense system is being delivered to Tehran, and Iran itself has withdrawn the lawsuit that was previously filed against the Russian Federation.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Teberii
    Teberii 9 December 2015 14: 35 New
    18
    Yes, why not, the sanctions were lifted. Iran needs to be strengthened over the years of isolation. Need help.
    1. Air Force captain
      Air Force captain 9 December 2015 14: 39 New
      20
      and at the same time support the defense industry .. as they say one does not interfere with the other
      1. makst83
        makst83 9 December 2015 14: 54 New
        10
        не только ОПК поддержать, но подпалить седалище у "заклятых друзей" из стран монархий ПЗ и САШС! laughing
      2. kodxnumx
        kodxnumx 9 December 2015 18: 33 New
        0
        Iranians are certainly not a gift, but I think it’s possible to cook porridge with them! Yes, they really need modern weapons, what the hell doesn’t joke, maybe for a long time good relations between our countries and wake up!
    2. Cherdak
      Cherdak 9 December 2015 15: 33 New
      18
      Quote: Teberii
      We hope that relevant contracts will be concluded.

      Do you pass by such beauty?
      1. Cherdak
        Cherdak 10 December 2015 13: 00 New
        0
        По совокупности показателей новый российский танк Т-90МС является лучшим на международным рынке вооружений. С таким заявлением выступил заместитель генерального директора "Рособоронэкспорта" Сергей Гореславский.

        "Новый танк Т-90МС неоднократно демонстрировался на международных выставках, в том числе крупнейшей региональной выставке IDEX в Абу-Даби. Мы убеждены, что по совокупности показателей и критерию "эффективность-стоимость" Т-90МС, являющийся вершиной развития семейства Т-72/Т-90, – лучший танк, предлагаемый сегодня на международном оружейном рынке", – цитирует Гореславского РИА Новости. Замдиректора возглавляет российскую делегацию на выставке Gulf Defence & Aerospace-2015 в Эль-Кувейте. В ее состав входят представители "Ростеха" и "Рособоронэкспорта".
        1. Cherdak
          Cherdak 10 December 2015 13: 03 New
          0
          Новейший российский танк восхитил военных экспертов еще в начале 2015 года на выставке в Абу-Даби. "Одна из ближневосточных стран предложила провести на ее территории в августе испытания танка Т-90МС", – рассказал заместитель гендиректора "Рособоронэкспорта" Игор Севастьянов. Кроме того, ряд государств Ближнего Востока еще в феврале 2015 года высказали серьезное намерение о приобретении российской новинки.

          Танк Т-90МС разработан и производен корпорацией "Уралвагонзавод". В новой модификации повышены все боевые характеристики, включая огневую мощь, защищенность, подвижность и командное управление. The main direction of modernization of the tank is the tower. It is equipped with a new automated fire control system, a more accurate 125 mm gun, remotely controlled 7,62 mm machine gun, and a new dynamic defense.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 9 December 2015 15: 43 New
      +9
      Iran’s withdrawal is not an oil market for us, it can be partially offset by grandiose contracts in the military sphere.
    4. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 9 December 2015 15: 44 New
      +3
      And not only tanks, and it’s possible, by the way, by bartering oil at preferential prices, the CPC is not far from the Caspian Sea from Iran and from there directly to Europe, as a response to Saudi dumping to seize the EU oil market
    5. War and Peace
      War and Peace 9 December 2015 16: 13 New
      0
      take the guys, with such tanks you will reach the lamb for several transitions, it’s time to punish homosexuals of Europe ...
  2. St Petrov
    St Petrov 9 December 2015 14: 35 New
    +6
    It is necessary to pump up Iran with weapons, the main thing is not to sell iskander calibers.
    1. Phantom Revolution
      Phantom Revolution 9 December 2015 15: 20 New
      +6
      Quote: s-t Petrov
      It is necessary to pump up Iran with weapons, the main thing is not to sell iskander calibers.

      It’s not necessary to pump up for free.)
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 9 December 2015 15: 26 New
      +3
      Quote: c-Petrov
      It is necessary to pump up Iran with weapons, the main thing is not to sell iskander calibers.

      Iskander and Caliber (for the Russian army) is a strategic long-range weapon. CLAB-K can be sold if asked (the range of the export version of the Caliber is 300 km).
  3. kit-kat
    kit-kat 9 December 2015 14: 35 New
    21
    The situation with the S-300 was very ugly. It's good that everything worked out.
    1. Penetrator
      Penetrator 9 December 2015 14: 46 New
      15
      Well, that worked out, yes. Only the person responsible for this ugly situation has not suffered any punishment and now occupies the post of prime minister.
      1. lelikas
        lelikas 9 December 2015 14: 54 New
        11
        Quote: Penetrator
        Well, that worked out, yes. Only the person responsible for this ugly situation has not suffered any punishment and now occupies the post of prime minister.

        Did he have a choice? He was never an independent figure in politics, even the war of 8,8,8 without the permission of the GDP could not start.
        1. Penetrator
          Penetrator 9 December 2015 15: 22 New
          +1
          Quote: lelikas
          Did he have a choice?

          Как не было выбора?! Он же был строгим и справедливым правителем Руси! Помните: "Каждое моё слово отливается в граните!"? Ну отлил бы сейчас хоть смс-ку иранцам с извинениями за прежний косяк. Или айфончик треснет?
      2. V.ic
        V.ic 9 December 2015 15: 14 New
        +3
        Quote: Penetrator
        Only the person responsible for this ugly situation did not suffer any punishment

        Вы думаете? "Наказали" же его "забугорники", подарив "айфончик"! Это же страшное наказание для совестливого и главное умного человека!
      3. Gomunkul
        Gomunkul 9 December 2015 16: 55 New
        -1
        Only the person responsible for this ugly situation has not suffered any punishment and now occupies the post of prime minister.
        Maybe he was so punished. laughing
        1. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 9 December 2015 18: 29 New
          0
          Quote: Gomunkul
          Maybe he was so punished

          It punished us.
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 9 December 2015 18: 27 New
      +1
      Quote: kit-kat
      The situation with the S-300 was very ugly.

      Thanks iPhone!
  4. sever.56
    sever.56 9 December 2015 14: 36 New
    +6
    It’s better to sell to Iran than to the Saudis and Qatar!
    Now that they have the S-300, ill-wishers will think three times whether it is worth using aircraft against the Iranians.
  5. The black
    The black 9 December 2015 14: 36 New
    +2
    Verdict: SELL! bully
  6. fregina1
    fregina1 9 December 2015 14: 36 New
    +5
    For native Persia ... but as much as you want ... only for cash! Even if the corps of guards is ext. tests in Syria!
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 9 December 2015 14: 37 New
      16
      Russia fought with the Persians more than once. There are no allies there, there are common interests for a given period of time

      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 9 December 2015 14: 48 New
        +6
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        Russia fought with the Persians more than once.

        After the last war, we even occupied them for a while. smile
        1. Sorokin
          Sorokin 9 December 2015 15: 00 New
          +1
          A bit wrong. Parts stood there from Azerbaijan. My dad went there on a donkey. There are photos abroad. On the flasks were inscriptions of 1945, but no one there took anything for themselves.
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 9 December 2015 16: 08 New
            +2
            Quote: Sorokin
            A bit wrong. Parts stood there from Azerbaijan. My dad went there on a donkey. There are photos abroad. On the flasks were inscriptions of 1945, but no one there took anything for themselves.

            Exactly. First there was a short Soviet-Iranian war of 1941, conducted by forces of 44 and 47 A ZakFR and 53 A SAVO. And then Iran signed an agreement according to which:
            The USSR and England received the right "to contain in the Iranian territory land, sea and air forces in such quantities as they consider necessary." In addition, the unified states were granted unlimited right to use, maintain, protect and, in case of military necessity, control over all means of communication throughout Iran, including railways, highways and dirt roads, rivers, airfields, ports, etc.
            Iran, in turn, has committed itself to “cooperate with the Allied states with all the means at its disposal and in all possible ways so that they can fulfill the above obligations”.

            In fact - this is she, the occupation.
        2. APASUS
          APASUS 9 December 2015 19: 25 New
          0
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          Russia fought with the Persians more than once.

          After the last war, we even occupied them for a while. smile

          But there was a time when Iran asked to become the 16th republic.
          In fact, the right decision, though the size of the party is unclear and whether they will insist on their assembly. Although Iran is better to buy more air defense systems.
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 9 December 2015 15: 30 New
        +3
        Quote: c-Petrov
        Russia fought with the Persians more than once. There are no allies there, there are common interests for a given period of time

        The same operation in Syria and the advertisement of our weapons in combat conditions and raises interest in our weapons, especially in the Middle East.
        And our tanks have always been the most warring in the world.
      3. Belopolyak
        Belopolyak 9 December 2015 16: 04 New
        0
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        Russia fought with the Persians more than once. There are no allies there, there are common interests for a given period of time

        Ну и еще тот факт, что теперь спорных территорий нет. Разве, что борьба за сферы влияния на этих территориях. Если, Азербайджан опять не начнет воду мутить с переименованием в "Северный Азербайджан" и т.п., то и не должно ничего плохого по идее быть...
      4. kit-kat
        kit-kat 9 December 2015 16: 27 New
        0
        Great UKR, again, fought with the Persians wink
  7. kugelblitz
    kugelblitz 9 December 2015 14: 36 New
    +1
    Normally, in the end, an adequate ally, that would not help.
    1. The black
      The black 9 December 2015 14: 38 New
      +5
      Нуууу на счёт "адекватному" это вопрос winked , but definitely need to sell
  8. Woodman
    Woodman 9 December 2015 14: 39 New
    +4
    Let him buy, pay him something, and we do not only trade oil and gas)))
  9. Engineer
    Engineer 9 December 2015 14: 40 New
    10
    Iran is on its mind, but we have no better option for cooperation in the BV. Therefore, the T-90MS will benefit such an alliance.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 9 December 2015 14: 56 New
      +1
      Quote: Engineer
      Therefore, the T-90MS will benefit such an alliance.

      MS, most likely it will not be mastered at a price, most likely that it will be easier to take.
      1. Phantom Revolution
        Phantom Revolution 9 December 2015 15: 28 New
        0
        Quote: lelikas
        MS, most likely it will not be mastered at a price, most likely that it will be easier to take.

        They can take a couple as commanders.)
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. tajik-airya.
        tajik-airya. 10 December 2015 22: 44 New
        0
        well yes. A country with 30 years of experience under the sanctions of the whole world and included in the top 20 economies (GDP 1,3 trillion) of the world will not be able to buy T50, rafael, T90ms, typhoon and more ....
  10. Lanista
    Lanista 9 December 2015 14: 51 New
    0
    Why not? And show which direction Turkey is.
  11. olf
    olf 9 December 2015 14: 55 New
    0
    Don't need your T-90 army? Of course, I am not against sales, but my own army should be saturated with new equipment in the first place.
    1. Phantom Revolution
      Phantom Revolution 9 December 2015 15: 26 New
      +4
      Quote: olf
      Don't need your T-90 army? Of course, I am not against sales, but my own army should be saturated with new equipment in the first place.

      У нас "Т-72" которые можно модернизировать до уровня "т-90" - это обойдется дешевле, а свободные деньги лучше направить на другие проекты в том числе и на "Армату". Тем более в наше кризисное время.
  12. Wolka
    Wolka 9 December 2015 14: 56 New
    +2
    however, with the Persians, too, one must always be more careful, the East is a delicate matter, anything can be ...
    1. teron
      teron 9 December 2015 15: 45 New
      +1
      Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye.
  13. solovey
    solovey 9 December 2015 15: 01 New
    +1
    not only tanks but also Su-30, Su-34 must be sold.
  14. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 9 December 2015 15: 11 New
    +1
    Contracts with the countries of the Middle East, especially with our old friend Iran, are just wonderful!
  15. konstant_n
    konstant_n 9 December 2015 15: 20 New
    +3
    Quote: olf
    Don't need your T-90 army? Of course, I am not against sales, but my own army should be saturated with new equipment in the first place.

    There’s a double edged sword: without exporting military equipment, it’s hard to scrape together for a purchase for your army.
    In the case of tanks, I will say more: we have a very large number of tanks of earlier models, and tanks are weapons in our case, a defensive war. That is, if they attack us, then we defend ourselves. And to protect their territory, you can use any tanks that are in service. In addition, I do not really believe that in the near future someone will want a land war on our territory. Therefore, tanks are quite a good export earnings item. What does the high-tech export.
    But airplanes need to be saturated with modern VKS missiles.
  16. eplewke
    eplewke 9 December 2015 15: 26 New
    0
    даёшь загрузку УВЗ! "Терминаторов" бы ещё заказали. Интересно Т-90А или Т-90СМ будут смотреть. СМ дороговатый говорят, вряд ли ИРИ потянут.
    1. tajik-airya.
      tajik-airya. 10 December 2015 22: 46 New
      0
      well yes. A country with 30 years of experience under the sanctions of the whole world and at the same time, the world will not be able to buy the T20, Rafael, T1,3ms, typhoon, etc., which is in the top 50 economies (GDP 90 trillion) ....
    2. tajik-airya.
      tajik-airya. 10 December 2015 22: 46 New
      0
      well yes. A country with 30 years of experience under the sanctions of the whole world and at the same time, the world will not be able to buy the T20, Rafael, T1,3ms, typhoon, etc., which is in the top 50 economies (GDP 90 trillion) ....
  17. rusaiaiBishkek
    rusaiaiBishkek 9 December 2015 15: 30 New
    0
    the Persians are arming themselves. Turks beware.
  18. TTX
    TTX 9 December 2015 15: 33 New
    +2
    Merikos are sleeping and see Iran destroyed. It is necessary to help, and not only the T-90 by other means, either, the only question is whether the allies are to us?
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 9 December 2015 16: 05 New
      +1
      Honestly, I didn’t quite understand how they could buy tanks, they were offensive weapons, and they couldn’t be delivered to Iran for almost another 5 years, although some kind of instrument for supplying weapons there was specified there, such as a special permission of the UN Security Council.
      In fact, Iran just really needs to update its armed forces, and the complex here includes the ground forces and the Air Force and Navy, Air Defense, and so on, we could support our ally against terrorism as well as the enemy of the United States, Persian monarchies, Israel, Turkey well and earn a lot of money on this which we need so much to confront our enemies.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. DobryAAH
        DobryAAH 9 December 2015 18: 51 New
        0
        Through unrecognized states.
    2. tajik-airya.
      tajik-airya. 10 December 2015 22: 51 New
      0
      Usa wants to see many who are destroyed, including Russia, and so what? Or do you believe in fairy tales like a full-scale war between Iran and the USA?)
    3. tajik-airya.
      tajik-airya. 10 December 2015 22: 51 New
      0
      Usa wants to see many who are destroyed, including Russia, and so what? Or do you believe in fairy tales like a full-scale war between Iran and the USA?)
  19. Valkh
    Valkh 9 December 2015 15: 45 New
    +2
    Quote: Penetrator
    Well, that worked out, yes. Only the person responsible for this ugly situation has not suffered any punishment and now occupies the post of prime minister.

    And yet, Gaddafi is very sorry !!!!!!
  20. newcomer
    newcomer 9 December 2015 15: 54 New
    +5
    Unas a great deal in cooperation with Iran. armored vehicles, aviation, both military and civilian. the Iranian army is pretty worn out. The modernization choreography work is also in our hands. this will allow us to raise money for our production models.
  21. 3officer
    3officer 9 December 2015 16: 00 New
    0
    T 90s were seen in Syria, near Aleppo. Perhaps the Iranians were given a test drive in a combat environment. And most likely they were not disappointed, and the choice is optimal in terms of price and quality.
  22. Ruswolf
    Ruswolf 9 December 2015 16: 05 New
    +1
    It seems to me that the story of the lawsuit of Iran against Russia was a joint operation, against the background of not wanting to lift sanctions from Iran.
    After the appearance of this lawsuit and the alleged discord between Russia and Iran, the United States began to fuss about lifting sanctions.
    Is there a mistake, most were against the lifting of sanctions.
    If so, then the United States once again received a weekly footcloth on the boot!
  23. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 9 December 2015 16: 23 New
    +1
    T-90 while they take-Need to sell. And then China is breathing in the back of the head, they will sort it out with metal and other jambs and sell the MTB-3000. What kind of thermal imager will we set?
  24. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 9 December 2015 16: 50 New
    +1
    Надо продавать, лишняя заноза в заднице "партнеров" не помешает
  25. Anisim1977
    Anisim1977 9 December 2015 18: 00 New
    +1
    For good Persians, you need to buy a dozen T 100s for 72 T 90, which is reasonable both in terms of money and logic.
    I think about the tanks, they thought with a look at Iraq (to help) and to Turkey (to fill the face) - and there and there a lot of T 90 heaped up is not necessary, but mass is necessary.
    Yes, and a lot of T 72 (from conservation) can be negotiated at least tomorrow, and T 90 still has to wait.
  26. TOR2
    TOR2 9 December 2015 20: 39 New
    +1
    Не только Т-90. Нужно перевооружать всю армию Ирана, естественно не за бесплатно. НАТОвские мерзавцы не успокоятся пока пока не увидят перед своим "фейсом" достойный кулак, и собрать его можно из нескольких государств.
  27. Voltsky
    Voltsky 9 December 2015 22: 13 New
    0
    and so where did the t-90ms go, it seems like they said that the t-90ms is being tested by some kind of Middle Eastern country.
  28. PROXOR
    PROXOR 10 December 2015 10: 24 New
    0
    Let them take a series of SM. This is an alloy of technology. The Turks will be cabins with their Patton. The Turks have not really had their own tank yet.