The planes of the Iraqi Air Force conducted reconnaissance positions of Turkish troops in northern Iraq

As you know, on the eve of the deadline for the ultimatum that the Iraqi authorities put forward in relation to official Ankara, demanding the immediate withdrawal of the Turkish military contingent from Iraq. According to the governor of the Iraqi province of Ninew, where the Turkish military announced the protection of the training camps for the Kurdish Peshmerga militia, the number of Turkish soldiers exceeded 1000. At the same time, the presence in Iraq of at least two dozen tanks Turkish armed forces. Official Ankara said that it was not going to withdraw its troops from Iraq.

Today, official Baghdad circulated a report that the country's air forces conducted aerial reconnaissance and determined the exact coordinates of the concentration sites of Turkish military personnel. The official representative of the main military department of Iraq quoted news agency Sputnik:

Military aircraft yesterday conducted reconnaissance flights over the military base where Turkish troops are located, noting the coordinates of the deployment of troops and their number, as well as the number of tanks and weapons.

It is noteworthy that the Iraqi authorities sent an official appeal to the NATO leadership to influence the official Ankara in order to withdraw the Turkish military from Iraq. On Wednesday night, Iraq’s representative to the UN, Ali al-Hakim, said that negotiations with Turkey “went more successfully”. The appeal to the UN Security Council, as previously stated by the Prime Minister of Iraq, Haider Al-Abadi, has not yet become.

Comments

[sever.56]

Iraq cannot do anything.
Remember the creation of the Turkish Republic in Cyprus, when Turkey practically occupied a part of the territory. Nobody can still do anything with them. Erdogan is obsessed with the idea of ​​rebuilding the Ottoman Empire and is beginning to slowly squeeze out the territories of neighboring Syria and Iraq. Given that Turkey is the largest member of NATO, Iraq will swallow it, because it is beneficial for NATO to have Turkey in its membership.

[Grabberxnumx]

Will be able! The information was confirmed with facts, the goals were set, they gave time to disappear. Now it's up to a small thing - if they don't leave, something will fly by accident, after which the Foreign Ministry will express regret - "Oh, we were wrong!" Desert!

[Lyapis]

And then they will get an answer. And it’s good if NATO does not intervene.
Iraq is already spreading apart and the government barely has the strength to ensure that everything does not fall into the abyss. And having captured Turkey as an open enemy, Iraqis would have absolutely no strength ...

[Vend]

Iraq did the right thing. War is on hand only to the United States. Why follow their lead.

[Deniska999]

How to fight Iraq. He takes the year of Ramadi.

[Rrrj]

Quote: Wend

Iraq did the right thing. War is on hand only to the United States. Why follow their lead.

Ohhh, yes, only a person who doesn’t respect his homeland can say such a thing - you need to beat it off at all costs - and you - well, not at all - it’s not the whole country that’s been captured - such patriots -> patriots are swallowing ears.

[Vend]

Quote: rrrj

Quote: Wend

Iraq did the right thing. War is on hand only to the United States. Why follow their lead.

Oooh yes, only a person who does not respect his homeland can say this - you need to beat it off at any cost - and with you - well, nothing - it's not the whole country that was captured - such patriots -> patriots -> patriots
> all slap deaf ears.

I remember such patriots as you with foam at the mouth demanded the entry of Russian troops into Ukraine. There is a time when guns say, there is a time for diplomacy. Turn on the brain. What would Iraq get by attacking Turkey? A war with NATO, in which Russia would join on the side of Iraq. Give you the Third World? We must take into account the entire balance of power and further consequences. Therefore, they cannot defeat the President of Russia, because he thinks on 10 moves forward, and the USA only on 2. It has long been won the war not on the battlefield, but in diplomatic seats. You can defeat on the battlefield, but surrender everything that was conquered and watered with the blood of soldiers. In the history of such cases is enough.

[Rrrj]

Quote: Wend

I remember such patriots,

Here it is not necessary la-la - it is not known on whose side the truth.
What are the results of not introducing a military? Gas for free - provocations every now and then - a stink to the whole world, sanctions, a non-repayable loan - is this your tricky move?
Nobody answered for A321, for SU - while tomatoes are responsible ...

[Vend]

Quote: rrrj

Quote: Wend

I remember such patriots,

Here it is not necessary la-la - it is not known on whose side the truth.
What are the results of not introducing a military? Gas for free - provocations every now and then - a stink to the whole world, sanctions, a non-repayable loan - is this your tricky move?
Nobody answered for A321, for SU - while tomatoes are responsible ...

Why is it known. Huge expenses for the restoration of Ukraine, payment of Ukrainian debts, hatred of the hidden Svidomo, rampant banditry. the departure and creation abroad of the Bandera clique, the strengthening of NATO, as a confrontation with Russian aggression, etc.

[Rrrj]

Quote: Wend

Huge expenses for the restoration of Ukraine, payment of their debts, hatred of the hidden Svidomo, leaving and creating a Bandera clique abroad, strengthening NATO, as a confrontation with Russian aggression, etc.

From what you have listed, most of the cons are for us - and the other part is also at least a neutral value or, again, minus - depending on which side to file.

[Vend]

Quote: rrrj

Quote: Wend

Huge expenses for the restoration of Ukraine, payment of their debts, hatred of the hidden Svidomo, leaving and creating a Bandera clique abroad, strengthening NATO, as a confrontation with Russian aggression, etc.

From what you have listed, most of the cons are for us - and the other part is also at least a neutral value or, again, minus - depending on which side to file.

That is the point. Therefore, the troops did not enter. Why, the time will come, the West will do everything the way Russia needs. They just won't have a choice. Remember how the USSR broke in Afghanistan? It’s the same way, only many times stronger, and the West is now torn. Time works for Russia.

[theadenter]

Sometimes it’s better to gain strength and fight back than throw cannon fodder under the tanks.

[44 World]

It was necessary to bomb them after the expiration of the ultimatum, by doing so exclusively in the framework of international law, and Russia and many other countries would support Iraq, and who the hell would say a word ...

[Rustam]

4

4Mir RU Today, 13:24

what to bombard with words? in esperds

[Lyapis]

what to bombard with words? in esperds

Uh-huh. And "many other countries" would also support them ... in words.

[cniza]

Quote: Rustam

4

4Mir RU Today, 13:24

what to bombard with words? in esperds

It is very possible that the Turks themselves will provoke and seize more territory.

[veksha50]

Quote: 44World

а Russia and many other countries would support Iraq

Russia is only rising, or rather, trying to rise from the ashes, and it is not omnipotent, it’s time to understand this a long time ago ...

When you once again try to push Russia, the country in which you live, to another participation in the war, think not only about the economy, which is not only in the words of my beloved Siluanov, but also about the people of Russia, who should will go there and die ... Die - for what ???

And about other countries that will get involved in the war against Turkey on the side of Iraq ... List in the studio, pliz ...

[44 World]

I mean the support in the UN Security Council based on international law, and there was no NATURAL talk about any war, maybe I did not correctly formulate my point

[veksha50]

Quote: 44World

I mean support in the UN Security Council based on international law,

Do you still believe in the effectiveness of the UN Security Council ???
Russia is driving there now, and what ???
Both we and they exercise the right of veto when it is beneficial to anyone ...

And the truth - our truth - cannot be achieved there for a long time ...

[gladcu2]

veksha

There is no XNUMX% effectiveness of the UN. But there is an international rostrum of announcement and advocacy.

[gladcu2]

Veksha

Do not die, but fight for yourself.

It's easy to die. But it’s difficult to fight.

[hydrox]

Stop talking nonsense :: NATO has officially refused to participate in the Russian-Turkish conflict, considering it an interstate.

[Lyapis]

Stop talking nonsense :: NATO has officially refused to participate in the Russian-Turkish conflict, considering it an interstate.

Ok, stop talking nonsense.
That's just the question is about Iraq, and not about Russia. And certainly NATO will not refuse to carry out a demonstrative flogging of Iraq if it all the same goes to the conflict. Purely in order to show the world that NATO is defending its own. Moreover, some kind of stability in Iraq is supported, in many respects, precisely by the forces of NATO and their material support. Once this help is removed, the situation in the country will quickly go to waste.

[Pomeranian]

Exactly! You correctly noticed

Quote: Lyapis

Moreover, any kind of stability in Iraq is supported precisely by NATO forces and their material support.

Therefore, Iraq will be able to use them in the manner of a human shield. Or hostages, then the card will fall.
And de facto Iraq has long since collapsed.

[Lyapis]

Therefore, Iraq will be able to use them in the manner of a human shield. Or hostages, then the card will fall.

Hide behind American soldiers like a human shield?
Funny joke, let’s do it again.

[Pomeranian]

Exactly! You correctly noticed

Quote: Lyapis

Moreover, any kind of stability in Iraq is supported precisely by NATO forces and their material support.

Therefore, Iraq will be able to use them in the manner of a human shield. Or hostages, then the card will fall.
And de facto Iraq has long since collapsed.

[Kradi]

and the answer in this case will be direct aggression. here you can already ask for help.

[Sergey K.]

Will be able! The information was confirmed with facts, the goals were set, they gave time to disappear. Now it's up to a small thing - if they don't leave, something will fly by accident, after which the Foreign Ministry will express regret - "Oh, we were wrong!" Desert!

Iraq alone will not even try to confront Turkey. The time for the withdrawal of Turkish troops, which Iraq gave, is already over. We see the result. The Turks absolutely do not care. The Turks are confident that if something happens, NATO will come to the rescue. But if we look at Iraq, then they cannot enlist such support from other countries. Therefore, all the talk on the part of Iraq about the withdrawal of the Turkish troops will remain talk.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Sergey K.

But if we look at Iraq, then they cannot enlist such support from other countries.

Because in such a war it will be necessary not to help and support Iraq, but to fight for it. And who needs it now?

[Penzuck]

Launch "calibers" and sell (transfer) them to Iraq in flight.

[donavi49]

What for? You can abandon five to ten Scuds in the old fashioned way. There is no Cyrillic alphabet on missiles, Iraq will immediately speak out that it was his missiles, which were purchased for the offensive to the north, that had to be used for the interventionists.

And unlike Caliber and other things, the SCADAS cannot be intercepted by the Turks and not even properly tracked. Even the Americans, if they want, cannot help ...

[Al_oriso]

It seems that the time has come for Turkey, the time for her answer for the bomber and for the clouding of reason.

The main thing is not to overdo it.

[sever.56]

Quote: Grabber2000

Will be able!

Quote: Grabber2000

Now it's up to a small thing - if they don't leave, something will fly by accident, after which the Foreign Ministry will express regret - "Oh, we were wrong!" Desert!

Well, what are you talking about ... Compare the army of Turkey and Iraq! The Turkish army is the second in NATO in terms of numbers, after the United States. She has a good weapon.
Yes, they only need something to "arrive", there will be a reason to accuse Iraq of the attack and start a full-scale invasion and war, the result of which is predictable - the annexation of territories that the Turks need. I do not think that NATO comrades-in-arms will be indignant, and if they say something, the frostbitten Erdogan will simply send them.

[SAXA.SHURA]

Greyhounds must be treated and properly, and the Turks do not understand the words, like cockroaches.

[Now we are free]

Quote: sever.56

Iraq cannot do anything.
Remember the creation of the Turkish Republic in Cyprus, when Turkey practically occupied a part of the territory. Nobody can still do anything with them. Erdogan is obsessed with the idea of ​​rebuilding the Ottoman Empire and is beginning to slowly squeeze out the territories of neighboring Syria and Iraq. Given that Turkey is the largest member of NATO, Iraq will swallow it, because it is beneficial for NATO to have Turkey in its membership.

Hello valer
Well, in general, I agree with your comment BUT, imagine that the F-16 and SU-25 of the Iraqi Air Force will suddenly be armed with "Caliber" ... All the same, it will raise and still "there is".
And it’s hard to discern from the ground what is hanging there from an airplane flying at an altitude of 6 kilometers ...
Well, if the F-16 climbs 10 kilometers (to drop bombs from there), then it can be like the TU-22M3 or TU-160 in general, the discharged air creates visual illusions ...

[sever.56]

Quote: Now we are free

Well, in general, I agree with your comment BUT, imagine that the F-16 and SU-25 of the Iraqi Air Force will suddenly be armed with "Caliber" ...

Hi Iskander!
You see, I do not think that we can give "for temporary use" such advanced weapons to the Iraqis, given their complete dependence on the Americans. After all, they can give a couple of "Calibers" for study to the Americans, or they can take them away from the Iraqis. is it necessary?

Quote: Now we are free

From the ground it is difficult to discern what is suspended from a plane flying at an altitude of 6 kilometers ...
Well, if the F-16 climbs 10 kilometers (to drop bombs from there), then it can be like the TU-22M3 or TU-160 in general, the discharged air creates visual illusions ...

Purely hypothetically, even if such an option passes, it will give a little. You look at the Turkish army, and the Iraqi army - the difference in military potential is tens, if not hundreds of times. If Iraq succeeds after that, then only local ...

[veksha50]

Quote: sever.56

If Iraq succeeds after that, then only local...

I'm sorry, but I forgot to add another: "temporary" ...

Best regards

[sever.56]

Quote: veksha50

I'm sorry, but I forgot to add another: "temporary" ...

Exactly: - "very, very temporary" ...
Sincerely.

[Trailer]

Feel all the pathos ... conducted reconnaissance ... over the territory of your country ... Heroes, by golly

[Rustam]

Grabber2000 RU Today, 13:10 ↑
Will be able!

What can he do, having only 4 F-16Q units with Stone Age air-to-air missiles in service, sorry, they were not given AIM-120

So you don’t have to sing military songs, but rather learn the materiel of both countries

[veksha50]

Quote: Grabber2000

Now it's up to a small thing - if they don't leave, something will fly by accident, after which the Foreign Ministry will express regret - "Oh, we were wrong!" Desert!

In kindergarten such an option would be possible ...
Unfortunately, Iraq, Turkey and NATO together with it are not a kindergarten ...
And Turkey would not have got in there without the permission of the "daddy" -USA ...

[spiriolla-45]

Now NATO (USA) will support Turkey with particular zeal, given its confrontation with Russia.

[hydrox]

It can :: there is already an official statement by the Iraqi prime minister on the provision of military assistance in the form of using the aerospace bomber aircraft.

[moskowit]

"And I, and I, and I have the same opinion ..."

[Tor5]

And it would be great to fuck them! After all, they warned and gave time ....

[Konstantin Yu]

Quote: sever.56

... that NATO is beneficial to have Turkey in its composition.

.. That is exactly "HAVE" Turkey .. with the whole composition. As usual, they keep one (with ukrami or two) upstart for provocations ... if that, it's not a pity to drain ..

[222222]

7 December 2015.
Turkey requests $ 70 million bombs from US
..The Government of Turkey has requested a possible sale of Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) tail kits
comprised of 400 GBU-31 (V) 1 for use with Mk84 bombs, 200 GBU-31 (V) 3 for use with BLU-109 bombs, 300
GBU-38 for use with Mk82 bombs, 100 GBU-54 Laser JDAM kits for use with Mk82 bombs, 200 BLU-109
Hard Target Penetrator Warheads, and1000 FMU-152A / B fuzes. Non-MDE includes containers, support
equipment, spare and repair parts, integration, test equipment, publications and technical documentation,
personnel training and training equipment, US Government and contractor engineering and technical support,
and other related elements of logistics support.
The estimated cost is $ 70 million

[theadenter]

Turkey violated the sovereignty of a neighboring state. The international community will not intervene until the troops of neighboring countries enter Turkish territory.

[Mama_Cholli]

Cowards Iraqis. The aggressor needs to be destroyed on its territory (especially after previously uttered threat statements), and not to conduct reconnaissance.

Pisi: In an extreme case - reconnaissance in battle.

[spiriolla-45]

The area where the Turks are located is de facto not subordinate to Iraq, and the Turks recognized the Barzani government. Baghdad, except for crowing, can’t do anything now.

[Rustam]

Mama_Cholli (3) SU Today, 13:09
Cowards Iraqis. Destroy the aggressor on its territory

One more thing to humiliate then? or how in the good old chain of machine guns to the last? And there, Kurds of Barzani for the Turks and Yes, Give-it will be fun, you can certainly attract Iran

[Mama_Cholli]

Quote: Rustam

Mama_Cholli (3) SU Today, 13:09
Cowards Iraqis. Destroy the aggressor on its territory

One more thing to humiliate then? or how in the good old chain of machine guns to the last? And there, Kurds of Barzani for the Turks and Yes, Give-it will be fun, you can certainly attract Iran

Another who believes that the Iraqi Kurds themselves invited their worst enemies to their territory.

[Pomeranian]

They can strike only with aviation. The Kurds will not let in infantry and equipment.

[Pomeranian]

They can strike only with aviation. The Kurds will not let in infantry and equipment.

[Air Force captain]

The Turks generally beguiled the shores ... I think everything goes to the fact that soon the fight against ISIS in Syria will smoothly flow into an operation to force peace in Turkland

[78bor1973]

Actually, the Turks consider Iraq and Syria their territory, only Russians in Syria and Iraq do not have them, so long as they don't get the tough in there, nothing will change!

[Engineer]

Reconnaissance in battle must be carried out! Yes, no one - all the soldiers of the army of Hussein have long been fighting on the side of ISIS.

[dchegrinec]

It is necessary to beat the Turks gently, but it hurts!

[rotmistr60]

Now whoever has more show-offs will practice and everything will calm down. Iraq is still not in that weight category to butt with Turkey, which suffered in full.

[The black]

and I want to and pricks and dad (usa) does not order ...

[silver_roman]

the Turks themselves are rare pussies. I am sure that the states are behind them, because they would have crap 100 times our aircraft to shoot down and still occupy Iraqi territory. And since The UN Security Council consists mainly of the last prostitutes who remained silent, which means that "someone" is squeezing their balls very hard in a fist.
But on the other hand, if the Turks are destroyed in Iraq, then the 5th NATO amendment will not be violated, because there was no attack on Turkey, but only a defense against Turkey! I think it will. Shuffle a couple of calibers and then use the aircraft and turntables to finish. There is essentially nothing to finish. a couple of dozen old trash MBT Yankees and 1000 beard Janissaries.

[The black]

This is what we have to go to the Turks in Iraq from the calibers ?. Why shouldn't the Americans do this? Do not forget that those in power in Iraq are "elected" by the freedom-loving people of the United States (white house) ... So we don’t need to get involved in Iraq. Why please Obama?

[silver_roman]

Quote: Black

Why not do this to the Americans?

Turks - Faithful 6 Yankees. why kill your dogs ?!
Iraq almost no longer exists. It is so ... a miserable semblance of past greatness. there’s nothing to fight for.
Our calibers, turntables and LA - Iraq. It seems like they bought equipment from us and from the states. Something must be there.

[The black]

I understand that the Turks and the Americans are in the same harness. Hence the question, but doesn’t it seem strange to you that Iraq was going to contact us right away, why didn’t they complain to the Americans? For me, this is a feint for Iraqi ears. The goal is to drag us into Iraq as well.

[silver_roman]

and the meaning of knocking on a door that is probably closed?
Iraq understands this. Moreover, this does not officially channel, there is a UN Security Council for this. At an unofficial level, I’m sure the contacts were with the Yankees. Now the news has appeared that they want to withdraw from the security agreement with the states ...
Moreover, Iraq did not immediately intend to contact us. And until then he did not apply.
In addition, who else should I contact? There are 2 forces in the region, the first - the Yankees with their own 6, the second - we are in splendid isolation.

[Konstantin Yu]

Quote: Black

This is what we have to go to the Turks in Iraq from the calibers ?. Why shouldn't the Americans do this? Do not forget that those in power in Iraq are "elected" by the freedom-loving people of the United States (white house) ... So we don’t need to get involved in Iraq. Why please Obama?

.... "the freedom-loving people of the white house")) .. I already got everyone

[Same lech]

The country's air force conducted aerial reconnaissance and established the exact coordinates of the places of concentration of Turkish troops

And then what?

The data of such reconnaissance is valuable for a short time and over time their value tends to zero ... the enemy will not change his location and will again need additional reconnaissance ....
so it can go on ad infinitum

[Wolka]

nothing will happen, but the Turks should still be put in place ...

[AlexTires]

And why didn’t they fly, tossed it up - it would be for the Turks napalm to sugre, so as not to drive the equipment twice!

[Pomeranian]

Here it is worth considering a whole bunch of small nuances.
1. Will Iraq be able to defeat the Turkish troops? Yes, easy. The central government will promise the Iraqi autonomy to the Kurds, voila, they have well-trained and well-organized infantry. I think to tickle the aphedron of "friend Erdogan" from somewhere and equipment will appear. Abkhazia, for example, will sell.
2. Is NATO intervention possible under 5 Article of the Charter? Unlikely. Firstly, Turkish troops are on foreign territory. Secondly, none of the Iraqi official authorities recognized by the same West called them there. That is, this is an invasion. NATO will not subscribe.
3: As the previous speaker rightly remarked, the Turks recognized the Barzani government. And who else? And no one, therefore, for the whole world, the Turks support the separatists who violate territorial integrity. Not like Russia in the Donbass - by humcon convoys, but by its troops. There is nothing to cover the West.
4. We conclude - soon its owners will merge Erdogan.
Threat. Sorry for the mnogabukaf. And for me, it’s a mystery: how did the Kurds cooperate with their eternal enemy? Or, like everywhere else, does a fish rot from its head?

[Rustam]

Pomeranian SU Today, 13:47 PM New

Here it is worth considering a whole bunch of small nuances.

Yah

1. The Kurdish Peshmerga Barzani, trained and equipped by the USA and Germany, feels great with the Turks and everything is charming with them, the flows of fuel trucks go where necessary
2. Why Turks NATO intervention? The Turkish army is head and shoulders higher both morally and in equipping the Iraqi army - there are no problems there, unless Iran fits in, the government in Baghdad is dependent on the United States there
3. Yes to the West do not care when they need they close their eyes
4. not a fact, and a lot of helpers and patrons in the person of Qatar and Saudi Arabia

reference

The Turkish Air Force, according to rough data, has about 40 Canadian-made NF-5E Tiger multi-role fighters, 237 F-16C / F-16D Falcon (some of the fighters were produced under license in Turkey itself by Turkish Aerospace Industries "); the fleet of training aircraft is represented by 68 T-38M and 24 T-41D aircraft. The military transport aviation is armed with 18 C.160 Transall aircraft of Franco-German production, 13 С-130В / С-130Е Hercules, 61 Tusas CN-235M (Spanish aircraft from CASA was also produced in Turkey under license), two newest "transport aircraft" A400M. In addition, three E-737-700 long-range radar detection aircraft (AWACS) entered service with the Turkish Air Force. The helicopter units include 106 UH-1N Iroquois multipurpose vehicles, 98 S-70 Black Hawk amphibious assault vehicles, 49 AB-204/206 reconnaissance helicopters, 44 AN-1F / AN-1W Super Cobra attack helicopters, 89 French-made AS.532AL machines, 18 Mi-17 multipurpose helicopters (used in the gendarmerie), Turkish-assembled T-129B helicopters

[Belarus]

I agree that the "authorities" of Iraq will not do anything and will confine themselves to only empty statements and the same requests. The Iraqi government controls only certain areas in Baghdad. Those who govern Iraq do not really care what the leader of some districts of Baghdad.
Nobody will bomb the Turkish units for a number of reasons, one of which is that the Iraqi F-16s cannot take off without the permission of the American side, much less bombing someone (there is such a point in conditions for the supply of aircraft from America to Iraq).
And to ask the Russian Aerospace Forces to strike at Turkish units in Iraq, then I’m sorry, I’m not fools.
How will this end? Nothing, they’ll just let everyone down on the brakes.

[Recoil]

People, you persistently forget that Turkey is a member of NATO.
She can do what is pleasing and with whom it is pleasing. She wants to, will shoot down our planes, if the USA permits, she will take a piece of Iraq, Syria or some other Libya.
And we will swallow it all, kneeling.
Or are you for World War III?

[Tanker55]

She can do what is pleasing and with whom it is pleasing. He wants to bring down our planes, if the US permits

Dear Kickback, it might not be worth talking so loudly and harshly. There is a time and a deadline for everything. There is still such a thing as patience.

[Cossack Ermak]

Quote: Rollback

People, you persistently forget that Turkey is a member of NATO.
She can do what is pleasing and with whom it is pleasing. She wants to, will shoot down our planes, if the USA permits, she will take a piece of Iraq, Syria or some other Libya.
And we will swallow it all, kneeling.
Or are you for World War III?

That's exactly the same way Hitler was indulged. If only there was no second world .... Although, of course, Erdogan to Hitler, as if on foot to the moon.

[Cossack Ermak]

Razbombya Turks at home Iraq does not risk anything.
1. The Turks were warned. Gave them time.
2. Iraq does not violate international laws.
3. you can always otmazyvatsya, saying that we mixed up and hit ISIS, since the good-neighborly Turkish troops a priori should not be on the territory of friendly Iraq.

[31rus]

Dear, what are you talking about? Turkey shot down a Russian plane, even Medvedev confirmed the war during the Soviet era without warning, now we can’t, so what do you want from Iraq? From Syria?

[salad]

Perdogan stupid rushing to Iraq, will not go far! not a big skirmish, and all and then declare that Turkey is participating in the war and block the strait! solely for these reasons 100%

[igorka357]

Damn how you got with these straits, go read the convention, under what conditions and to whom, Turkey can block the straits !!!

[Former battalion commander]

It is time to help Iraq in this noble cause ... Yes, and Russian pilots must avenge their innocent Turks killed ...

[SPB 1221]

Quote: rrrj

Quote: Wend

Iraq did the right thing. War is on hand only to the United States. Why follow their lead.

Oooh yes, only a person who does not respect his homeland can say this - you need to beat it off at any cost - and with you - well, nothing - it's not the whole country that was captured - such patriots -> patriots all slap deaf ears.

You smell Russian for two kilometers! And I shake your hand, not an inch of the earth, not a single high-rise! But they are unfortunately Arabs, the mentality is slightly different!

[Gunther]

Baghdad seems to be of little interest to the United States:
"In Iraq and Syria, ground forces may be introduced under the auspices of the United States.
We are talking about a 100-strong contingent. But, apparently, Washington is going to fight the "Islamic State" by proxy - 90 thousand soldiers and officers will be transferred from the Arab states, primarily from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Jordan. The head of the Iraqi government, this initiative, according to the source, caused bewilderment. however, McCain allegedly stated that everything had already been decided in Washington."
In the light of this decision, the introduction of the occupying Turkish forces seems consistent.

[Gunther]

Baghdad seems to be of little interest to the United States:
"In Iraq and Syria, ground forces may be introduced under the auspices of the United States.
We are talking about a 100-strong contingent. But, apparently, Washington is going to fight the "Islamic State" by proxy - 90 thousand soldiers and officers will be transferred from the Arab states, primarily from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Jordan. The head of the Iraqi government, this initiative, according to the source, caused bewilderment. however, McCain allegedly stated that everything had already been decided in Washington."
In the light of this decision, the introduction of the occupying Turkish forces seems consistent.