The Chinese have developed a robotic trio: scout, gunner and sapper

The Chinese company HIT Robot Group presented three combat robots: reconnaissance, sapper and shooter, who can act both independently and as part of a group, coordinating their actions with each other, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to foreign media.

The first robot is designed for reconnaissance and surveillance operations, it is equipped with cameras and sensors for the detection of explosives.

“If he manages to detect a landmine or a suspicious object, then the robot sapper comes into play. The operator, with the help of a remote control system, clears the find or transfers it with the help of a mechanical manipulator arm to a safe place, ”the newspaper writes with reference to the developers.

The third robot - shooter - is armed with an automatic rifle and a small-caliber grenade launcher. “An optical sight, an electric trigger and a remote control system allow the operator of this robot to conduct aimed fire from a shelter in a safe place,” the publication notes.

Robots have the same tracked platform and differ only in the functional superstructure. The weight of each of them is about 12 kg, so they can easily be transported in special backpacks.

The cost of the whole team will be estimated at $ 235 thousand. Beijing police have already shown interest in the trio.

Comments

[Dimsanych]

it is unclear what they had been waiting for so long. With their capabilities and production facilities.

[cniza]

Quote: DimSanych

it is unclear what they had been waiting for so long. With their capabilities and production facilities.

Energy, everything depends on energy ... how long will they work?

[Alex_Rarog]

Yes, even if the hour ... In an extreme situation, the hour is just an archimony, especially an extra shooter.

[Denis Obukhov]

Fuck the Chinasians robots, there is not a measured population, you can safely flock a warrior to a minefield to drive, the army will not suffer

[Rivares]

Quote: DimSanych

it is unclear what they had been waiting for so long. With their capabilities and production facilities.

I wonder who they communized with the idea? So that the Chinese come up with something new, Santa Claus should be born in Africa)))

[Tor5]

It is not excluded that this "company" was created some time ago, and now it is an opportunity to demonstrate them.

[vkl-47]

I saw this ... on Aliexpress :)

[kil 31]

If they are for fighting. I don't even know about the "shooter" and the "scout". Too small, as the "shooter" will shoot on rough terrain if there are bumps ahead. The same applies to the scout.

[Rivares]

Quote: keel 31

If they are for fighting.

For fighting, the Chinese will come out cheaper)))

[RussiaSILA]

If they are for fighting. I don't even know about the "shooter" and the "scout". Too small, as the "shooter" will shoot on rough terrain if there are bumps ahead. The same applies to the scout.

Maybe they did stabilization like on tanks) Although with such dimensions this is unlikely

[44 World]

Something the price is not small, especially for Chinese production ...

[S-cream]

All this is pampering, maximum for short operations. And it will be pampering, until they invent ultra-compact and ultra-high-capacity batteries.

[cniza]

The Chinese company HIT Robot Group introduced three combat robots: reconnaissance, sapper and gunner,

The war will be funny soon.

[Altona]

Quote: cniza

The war will be funny soon.

------------------------
Key phrase in the article: "Beijing law enforcement agencies are interested." By the way, in the absence of a real task, you can play on the parade ground in pokatushki races ...

[cniza]

Quote: Altona

interested in Beijing law enforcement agencies "

Yes, for them it is of interest, and so on the parade ground ...

[Vladimirets]

"The robots have the same tracked platform and differ only in the functional superstructure. Each of them weighs about 12 kg."

I wonder how much explosive devices a robot sapper can carry "with the help of a mechanical manipulator arm to a safe place"having such a small mass of its own and a relatively small base?

[dchegrinec]

A little sextet to come up with? A scout, a sapper, a miner, a sniper, a shooter, a paratrooper!

[Lumumba]

Quote: Haettenschweiler

- Despite the fact that the most logical thing for the Chinese to do (in view of their population) is usually, sadly, the Russian commanders sinned. The most striking and indicative example of their mediocre command is the First World War.

In these sad times, no country in the world was somehow distinguished by philanthropy and humanism in hostilities. Not only Russia.

[Chicot 1]

The Chinese have developed a robotic trio: scout, gunner and sapper

It remains only to invent a robotic rickshaw ...

[Al_oriso]

Sapper?
A good mine will smash this robot.

[tasha]

A little bit off topic
I recommend watching the Chinese film "War of the Wolves" (2015). The film, of course, is still that propaganda, but it fits in one row with our "Return move", "Case in the square 36-80" and others, adjusted for time, of course.
From the pros - a lot of interesting things about the Chinese army.

[Denis Obukhov]

Quote: tasha

A little bit off topic
I recommend watching the Chinese film "War of the Wolves" (2015). The film, of course, is still that propaganda, but it fits in one row with our "Return move", "Case in the square 36-80" and others, adjusted for time, of course.
From the pros - a lot of interesting things about the Chinese army.

Advantages of the film: I think that amateurs looking at the gunmen who shoot out from everything that shoots will find interesting moments for themselves in this film. Personally, I liked the moment with the shooting from the gatling, albeit implausible. Filmed more or less decently, that is, camera work, editor, sound.
Cons of the movie: The plot is crazy. Implementing it too. Actors play no matter at the level of cheap American thrash. In principle, this film is similar to trash, only a little more expensive and Chinese. Moments of sickening propaganda of Chinese nationalism, and the exaltation of the Chinese military.
In general, I would rate this movie at 5 points out of 10. It is watchable, but on the verge of sludge, and it’s better to watch such a movie with beer, otherwise you can fall asleep from what is happening on the screen.

[Gomunkul]

The Chinese have developed a robotic trio: scout, gunner and sapper

After reading the title I thought, here are the cunning Chinese, they went around the whole world, and then

“The optical sight, electric trigger and remote control system allow the operator of this robot to conduct targeted fire from shelter in a safe place,” the publication notes.

here it’s not clear in the designation: in my understanding, a robot is an autonomous device that performs actions according to a specific program, i.e. offline. Common remote telecontrolled mechanical manipulators are mentioned here. And where are the robots?

[tasha]

How many dictionaries - so many interpretations.
Perhaps in this article, by robot we mean something electromechanical with AI elements.

For example, a robot sapper. The operator remotely turned it on, the machine went ahead, the sensor detected a control unit, the machine stopped, the operator told BIP. Robot or not a robot? Or a robot shooter. He travels around the perimeter and shoots at the bushes according to a given program. Robot or not a robot?
Philosophy, however ...

[Izotovp]

Journalists designate everything as a robot, although in reality they are nothing more than remotely controlled devices. The robot implies the independent implementation of the task.

[Gunther]

Judging by the photo - a city model, and even which city and which puddles may drown)))

Haettenschweiler Quote:
sadly, this commanded the Russian commanders. The most striking and indicative example of their mediocre command is the First World War.

Regarding the "Russian commanders", in the empire, unfortunately, there were unjustifiably many foreigners, including in the army.
Speaking about "[b] mediocre command [/ b]", it would be good to give specific examples.
Well, for example, b] The battle of Galicia [/ b] was an example of "talentless command"?
Of course, there were setbacks during the East Prussian operation, but the main thing - [b] military defeat [/ b] of the Russian Empire in World War I was not, even after the February coup, the Russian army conducted successful military operations (battle of Marasesti).
The Russian army was broken not by Germany, but by two revolutions that ruined the economy and disorganized the army ("bayonet into the ground").
I recommend on the theme of the 1st World Memoir of Paul von Hindenburg)))

[Termit1309]

Quote: Gunter

The Russian army was broken not by Germany, but by two revolutions that ruined the economy and disorganized the army ("bayonet into the ground").
I recommend on the theme of the 1st World Memoir of Paul von Hindenburg)))

Your opponent threw shit on the fan and knocked it down. He will not read books

[Tutu]

http://sputniknews.cn/china/20151125/1017129707.html

[Tutu]

http://sputniknews.cn/china/20151125/1017129707.html

[Tutu]

http://sputniknews.cn/china/20151125/1017129707.html