"Where did the Rus come from?"
The Nestor Chronicler at one time asked himself the question “Where did the Russian land come from?” And he answered it quite clearly, starting the countdown from the biblical Japheth (Yapet), son of Noah, then “according to the same history” (a very important aspect, time ", that is story Russian people has more than one millennium) placed Russia in the Balkans, in Norik on the Danube and then gradually brought it to modern habitats. Japheth is considered one of the pioneers of mankind, generally Caucasians (the white race) and Indo-Aryans.
An interesting fact is that Nestor (one of the authors of The Tale of Bygone Years) at the beginning of his work defined the history not of the Rus state, but of the people who wore many names in their historical development and later created the Russian state. However, in the “classic” version of history, which replaces the true history of the Russian people (the super-ethnos of the Rus), they prefer to see only the history of one of the later Russian state formations - “Rus” of Rurik, Oleg and Igor (Novgorod and Kievan Rus). We, as new facts emerge and trickle-through about the history of the Russians, now we understand that the ethnic people are sometimes more durable than other states and the most powerful empires. Only in the official version of the story we already see several large-scale state and even design changes. This is the “old Russian” empire of Rurikovich, and a period of fragmentation with the gradual shift of the passionary, spiritual and political core of Russia to the northeast, and the revived empire of Ivan the Terrible with the merging of Russia and the Horde, and the kingdom, and then the Romanov empire, and the Soviet civilization, and Russian Federation. The state is changing, but its civilizational, state-forming core is the former - Russian super-ethnos.
Given that history (chronology) is, along with ideology, the leading factor that determines the present and future of civilization, statehood and people, it is necessary to radically change the perception of our past, including the history of all mankind. A state program is needed to study the true history of the Russian superethnos (Rus). The refusal of the installations, which the West imposed on us, on the “secondary importance”, “inferiority” of the Russians, who are supposedly the outskirts of European civilization and “spoiled” by the Asiatic. It is necessary to realize that history is a part of geopolitics, the Big Game for leadership on the planet. As long as we follow other people's attitudes and do not have “our own” history (and, accordingly, politics), we are doomed to failure.
We are obliged to put the question: "where did the Rus come from?" Most often, the “classical” science leaves the direct answer to such questions and reports: “From that year (century) when a written mention of a given people appears, then we can start counting its history.” Interestingly, this approach does not apply to all nations. But on the Russian and Slavs applies. Typical double standards. We have to remember that “written references” and sources are a subjective category, and an ethnos people is absolutely objective, existing regardless of whether they mention it or not.
Modern science has methods to get to the roots of any, even the most ancient people. The combination of archeology, anthropology, linguistics, ethnology, comparative myth analysis, toponymy, genetics and other special disciplines allows us to do this with a high degree of certainty. And sometimes the results can be shocking. So, during the time of the Third Reich, the Nazis were actively searching for the roots of the most ancient origin of the Germans. In particular, archaeological excavations were carried out in the Germans' residences, which were considered the basis of history, the spirit of the nation. As a result, they found out that Berlin, like other "Old German" cities, stands on the site of Slav-Russian settlements, and the whole of Germany is based on the ashes of the Slavic civilization of Central Europe, which was destroyed with fire and sword. It turned out that the Slavs and Russians, whom the Nazi ideologues wrote down in the "subhumans" and planned to "clean up", have a more ancient history than the Germans, and closer to the legendary Aryans, who became the founders of several existing and already dead civilizations of Eurasia (Russian, European Indian, Iranian, etc.). The latest studies show that the current Germans are largely assimilated, “Germanized” Slavs, Russ.
According to a similar scheme, "ancient ukrov" is now being created in Malorussia-Ukraine. The true history of the Rus superethnos is mixed with the nonsense of the Ukrainian spill, they get the "ancient history" of Ukraine. In addition, as with the Nazis, the masters of the West solve the most important task: the true history of the Aryans and Rus is discredited. In particular, they discredit and demonize the most ancient symbols of the Aryans and Rus - the swastika-solstice, trident-trident. The idea of the most ancient ancestral homeland of the Aryan-Indo-Europeans and the white race in general in Northern Eurasia (Hyperborea), etc., is mixed with the negative.
Just a few facts on a common logic point to the ancient history of the Russian people. So, already during the first princes of Rurikovich, uniting the Slavic-Russian lands - tribal alliances, Russia was a highly developed “country of cities” (Gardarika), which could put out a powerful army and navy, with developed craft production. Russia had its own writing and epic epic, stretching to hoary antiquity. That is the empire of Rurikovich had the powerful base going deeply to the past. It is impossible from scratch, with the "wild Slavs" to build a developed state, which easily challenged the most advanced state of the then West - the Byzantine (Romean) empire.
Thus, it turns out that the empire of the first Rurikovichs already had a powerful and ancient foundation. It could not have appeared out of nowhere, in the place of the "primitive tribes" who had "prayed to the stubs."
Upcoming conversation. Artist Vsevolod Ivanov
The Russian people, even after all the wars of extermination and invasions, genocides, revolutions, “perestroika and“ reforms ”of the 20th and early 21st centuries. remain one of the largest nations of the world. At the beginning of the 20th century, Russia was second only to China and India in terms of population. And if three geopolitical catastrophes were the 1917 revolution and the subsequent Civil War and the intervention of external forces, the invasion of the European horde led by Hitler in 1941 and the counterrevolution of 1991 and the subsequent genocide of the Russians (called socio-economic "reforms") , now we could still be the third largest nation in the world, having about 500-600 million people. It is not for nothing that the brilliant Russian scientist DI Mendeleev calculated that by the middle of the 20th century there should be at least 400 million Russians. Unfortunately, the last century was very difficult for Russians, we more than once found ourselves on the verge of survival. And now again this moment, or we will either mobilize and make a leap into the future, surprising all of humanity, or the Fourth World War will be the last for us.
Nevertheless, Russians together with the entire Slavic world constitute the largest linguistic group and ethnic community in Europe. It must be said that the Russians and Slavs had a hard time, they were exterminated from century to century, enslaved and assimilated. However, Russians and Slavs are still the largest community in Europe!
Thousands of years ago, according to scientists, the Slavs had at least 10 million. That is, then they were the largest ethno-linguistic group in Europe. But it is known that according to toponymy (science that studies geographical names - toponyms), the Slavs firmly settled the lands of Eastern, Northern, Central and Southern Europe since ancient times (in particular, they settled the lands of modern Germany and Austria). As the ancient and Byzantine writers, the later chroniclers often followed them, Slavonic Russians either in the “Germans” (Vandals, Wends, Cherusks, Rugia, etc.), then in the “Scythians” and “Sarmatians”, then in the “Ancient Greeks "(Slavs-Macedonians). Given this, it is obvious that in the beginning and in the middle of I millennium BC. er Slavs made up half or even most of the population of Europe.
The question arises: “Could this half or most of the population of Europe simply take it and appear from nowhere in the 4th-6th centuries? n uh? The answer is obvious. Multi-million ethnic groups do not arise out of nowhere. Each of the millions of Slavs-Russ had parents, great-grandfathers, and ancestors — behind them were generations and generations of ancestors, who passed on to their descendants a language, a certain spiritual and material culture, and ethnic characteristics.
Thus, descending down the timeline, we reach the Slavic-Balt linguistic community. And we remember that the Prussian Prussians were Slavonic Russians, the ancestors of modern Lithuanians and Latvians worshiped common gods with Slavs in the XIV century (Perkunas-Perun and Velsu-Veles). Then we enter the German-Slavic-Balt community, then the Indo-European (Aryan) ethno-cultural community with its common language. We absolutely know for sure that the ancient Indo-Europeans (Aryans) are the direct ancestors of Russians and, accordingly, Russians. It is indisputable.
And here it turns out an amazing fact. When we begin to compare the languages of the Indo-European family with the language of the Indo-European-Aryans, it turns out that the closest to the original Indo-European is neither Latin, nor Greek, nor German, but Sanskrit and Russian. Sanskrit carriers became extinct and assimilated into Indian ethno-massif. And Russians live and preserve the language, which is basically the most ancient language of the Indo-Europeans-Aryans. And this is an absolute indicator that although the Slavs, the Germans, the Romanesses, the Greeks, the Indo-Iranians are all direct descendants of Indo-Europeans, but the Russians are the direct bearers of their language. In other Indo-European languages, only fragments of a single parent language have survived.
Apparently, it's not for nothing that Western reformers try so hard to “format” our language. The Russian language is a heritage of the most ancient epochs, the true history of the Russian superethnos, the Indo-European family and the white race in general. And the masters of the West seek to preserve the truth about the past of mankind in secret, so that nothing prevents to continue the implementation of the project to enslave people.
And this is the reality. In terms of language, Russians are direct descendants of Indo-European Aryans. It must be remembered that in nature and society, in history, full equality is impossible. Someone always maintains direct stem continuity, and someone is a child, filial ethnos, or side escape. Thus, the Germans during the Second and Third Reich tried to prove that the Germans were direct descendants of the “Nordic race,” the Aryans. And the Slavs were recorded in the "inferior" nations. However, science shows that the Russians are the immediate and most direct descendants of the Indo-Europeans of all the existing nations. And the Germans, the Romanesses and the “ancient Greeks” are inferior in this respect to the Slavs.
However, the ancient Indo-European Aryans themselves also had ancestors. Their Boreal language is called boreal. Once it was one of commonness. But then it was divided into Indo-Europeans, Early Altai (Turks, White Mongols, etc.) and Early Uralians (Finno-Ugric and other peoples). Indo-Europeans were the main branch, the trunk. From here, a straight line is built: the Boreals — the Indo-Europeans — the Slavorussians — the Russians. And if we take the dictionary of the reconstructed Boreal proto-language, we will see that almost all the root bases of this language correspond to the Russian root bases. For example, “mr-” - “frost, freeze, pestilence, dead”; “Dr-” - “to fight, fight”, etc. But the boreals also had ancestors, and their own language was nostratic.
Thus, we come to the origins of the history of mankind, the first people of our planet and the first language, the ancestral homeland of the white race. All this is still waiting for its researchers. However, the truth about the true history of mankind and the history of the Russian people is a question of geopolitics. It completely turns the view of our past. Leads to the idea that, perhaps, our human civilization is not the first on Earth. Destroys all the basics of the biblical concept and the German-Romance school. Therefore, they try to hide this truth and discredit and discredit them by launching fake fakes, like the myth of the “ancient Ukrakh”.
Another proof of the ancient origin of the Russo superethnos is ethnology (ethnography) and anthropology. This is from the point of view of the average man and the law that all people are equal (which is fair). From the point of view of anthropology, the modern world is inhabited by people of different millennia and epochs. So, the negros retained the pronounced features of arkhantropov (Latin Homo erectus - rectified man), who lived in Africa 200 thousands of years ago and earlier. The Chinese have retained the features of synanthropes (Latin Sinanthropus pekinensis - “Peking Man” who lived hundreds of thousands of years ago. In Europe, there are representatives of Caucasians, for example, among Anglo-Saxons or Swiss, with a sloping forehead and a massive skull of a Neanderthaloid of a hundred thousand years old. Ethnic Czechs, Slovakians , Poles, East Germans, Lithuanians and Russians retain their purely Cro-Magnon appearance, "a man of the modern type."
It is clear that in our era, only one subspecies of Homo sapiens sapiens, a Cro-Magnon type man, lives on Earth. The terms “neoanthropes”, “people of modern anatomy” (LSA), etc. are also used. Another thing is that in some lands, in some ethnic groups there are only Cro-Magnon type features, and in others you can see, or they immediately notice the outward signs of Neanderthals, synanthropes and other no less or even more "ancient people" arhantropists. What does this mean? The fact that some Cro-Magnonian clans lived for tens of thousands of years in the lands of their ancestral home or nearby, without mixing with “other people” or confusion was minimal. And others, actively or not very actively, but noticeably, mixed with neanderthaloids, synanthropes and other arhantropists. The arkhantropists themselves became extinct in pure form, but they gave their subspecies signs to some ethnic communities that are divided into races, subraces, and peoples.
And now the most important thing. Least of all such arhantropic impurities in a large Caucasoid (white) race. And within the race itself the least of them (almost none, or rather there wasn’t, given the new migration of peoples) in the minor races: Eastern Baltic and Central Eastern Europe. These minor races include Russians and partially Balts, except Estonian-Estonians, Scandinavians and East Germans (Germanized Slavonic Russians).
Thus, from the point of view of anthropology, Russians are direct descendants of the Cro-Magnons. And the question “where did the Rus come from?” Can be answered like this: from where people of the modern anthropological type appeared. It turns out that the Russians continue to inhabit the ancestral homeland of humanity Northern Eurasia (Hyperborea) and are direct descendants of the first people.
And again we are confronted with geopolitics. It is obvious that the current migration flows, when millions of Africans and Asians migrate to Europe, to the north, is a controlled process. One of the goals of the owners of the West is the assimilation, the dissolution of the white race in the "melting pot", the creation of an "economic man" who has no racial, ethnic, religious or cultural roots. No wonder migrants are sent to the last “reserves” of the white race - Germany, Scandinavia, the Baltic States, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Under the migratory blow Small Russia and the Russian Federation. The masters of the West want to mix all the races and nations in one “pot” in order to get the perfect slave. To destroy "the most recalcitrant people on Earth" - Russians, who retain the linguistic, anthropological and spiritual signs of the first people.
To be continued ...
Is it true that humanity originated in Africa? Is the ancient Egyptians really the first civilization on the planet? And can we say with absolute certainty that the north of Europe has never been inhabited, and the Slavic nation arose only in the 9 century of our era?
In recent years, the classical model has been increasingly questioned. stories and put forward new hypotheses of the emergence of human civilization. Numerous artifacts that researchers find in Yakutia and the Krasnoyarsk Territory, on the islands of the Arctic and in central Russia, make you wonder: maybe we know far from all our history? And in fact, the homeland of humanity is in a completely different place? In the Indian Vedas, the ancient system of ideas about the world, it is said that the mysterious ancient arias, which gave people culture and civilization, came from the north.
- Alexander Samsonov
- Russia Eternal
Russia Eternal
Information