Military Review

The missile defense system "Nudol". Data from The Washington Free Beacon and Known Facts

41
In early December, there were reports of a new Russian success in the field of armaments and military equipment. The foreign press has published data on the testing of new Russian weapons, which in the future will come to the defense of the country. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense of Russia, for some reason, has not yet commented on the reports of the foreign press and is in no hurry to confirm or deny the published data. Consider this situation in more detail.


The first message about the tests of the new weapons Russian development was published by the American edition of The Washington Free Beacon 2 December. The author of the publication, Bill Gertz, obtained from his sources data on the new Russian project and published them in the Russia Flight Tests Anti-Satellite Missile (“Russia completed a test launch of an anti-satellite missile”). As can be seen from the title, the author touched upon the topic of developing new tools that will be used in the future in the field of missile defense. The subtitle of the publication states that Russia joins China in the construction of its space defense potential.

At the very beginning of his article, B. Gertz claims that Russia conducted the first successful test launch of a promising anti-satellite rocket, which could be considered the beginning of a new stage in the militarization of outer space. According to the author, the launch of the rocket, known as the “Nudol”, took place on November 18. Information about these tests was obtained by the author from a source in the US military, who, however, was not named. The source also noted that this was the third test launch, but the first one that ended with the successful implementation of plans.


Presumably, the launcher complex "Nudol". Figure Bmpd.livejournal, com / Militaryrussia.ru


Further, the author recalls the projects of other countries. By launching the Nudol rocket, Russia joins China, which also develops special weapons to attack objects in outer space. So, in the last days of October, Chinese experts conducted a launch of a Dong Neng 3 rocket.

B. Gertts could not get comments from representatives of the Pentagon. Because of this, he had to turn to earlier statements by military officers. The head of the US Air Force Space Command, General John Heithen, warned not so long ago that Russia and China are currently working on new means of war in space, which could be a serious danger to the American group of spacecraft. The general stated in plain text that the new developments of other countries directly affect the interests of the United States.

The author of the publication Free Beacon notes that at the moment there is very little information about the Nudol project in the public domain. Nevertheless, he assumes that this development is being created as part of the construction and modernization of the missile defense system. From open sources, B. Gertz was able to find out that the promising defense system against long-range missiles, as well as a system for intercepting spacecraft, was being created within the framework of the ROC Nudol. The project is being developed by the Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern.

General Heithen, in his recent speech, stated that he did not want to see the spread of conflicts in outer space. However, he noted that the United States must be able to protect itself from such threats. According to the general, currently several countries in the world are working on promising projects of anti-satellite weapons. These are Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.

B. Hertz recalls the opinion of analysts, according to which anti-satellite weapons are particularly dangerous for the United States. With the help of a small number of interceptor missiles, Russia or China can cause serious damage to American reconnaissance, navigation, or communications equipment built on the basis of spacecraft. As a result of such an operation, the work of military and civil structures will be disrupted.

Immediately the author quotes the congressman from the pc. Kansas Mike Pompeo (Republican Party). In his opinion, testing of the Russian rocket is a problem. He talks about serious problems of a political and military nature: while US President Barack Obama is trying to cut the military budget and build relations with official Moscow, the Russian defense industry continues to develop its military systems designed for work in space. Such weapons, according to M. Pompeo, can make useless American cyber systems or advanced kinetic interceptors.

The congressman calls not to turn a blind eye to this problem, but to start creating a response. He demands to develop defense systems that can prevent the destruction of satellites by interceptor missiles, and also to deprive the potential adversary of the possibility of using anti-satellite weapons for political blackmail purposes.

There is no optimism in the opinion of the former employee of the American military department Mark Schneider, who is also quoted by B. Gertz. Russian tests, according to the former official, demonstrate the inability of the United States to effectively confront other countries in a hypothetical space war. M. Schneider believes that in the field of space weapons there is an abnormal bias towards potential adversaries. Over the past decades, Congress has prohibited the Pentagon from engaging in space weapons. As for the Russian industry, it, according to Schneider, does not face such restrictions. Moreover, Russia, if it needs it, even violates international agreements on armaments.

Having considered the risks associated with the recent tests of the Russian interceptor missile, B. Hertz tried to collect information on the promising Nudol project. With reference to several Russian sources, he mentions that Russia is currently implementing a project to modernize its missile defense. So, he refers to the recent statement by the commander of the missile defense division of the 1 Army Air Defense and ABM Defense Colonel Andrei Cheburin, who mentioned the modernization of existing systems. According to him, the troops will soon have to receive an updated missile defense system with the latest means of destruction.

Also B. Hertz tried to determine the approximate appearance of the promising system “Nudol”. Probably, this system will be used to protect certain regions of Russia from ballistic missiles, as well as to attack enemy space vehicles. It is noted that the only known image of this system implies the ability to quickly transfer some of its components using self-propelled chassis. At the same time, however, B. Hertz expresses doubts about the full realization of the advantages associated with the use of the chassis. To detect targets, the complex will need an appropriate radar station, which should also be mobile.

The author of the publication Free Beacon closes his article with a quote from officials and the latest the news. B. Gertz could not get a comment from the State Department, but he recalled past statements by representatives of this department. Thus, Frank Rose, assistant secretary of state for arms control, argued in February this year that continued development of anti-satellite systems is a destabilizing factor and, in the long run, threatens the security of the world and the preservation of outer space.

In the meantime, a strange event occurred in orbit. 25 November in orbit collapsed spacecraft NOAA 16, owned by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The cause of this accident is being investigated. The destruction of the apparatus was discovered by specialists of the space command of the air force. According to the representative of the command of Nick Mercurio, during the destruction next to NOAA 16 there were no extraneous objects. The wreckage of the apparatus does not pose a danger to other satellites.

***

Of some interest is the fact that information about the first successful launch of the interceptor of the Nudol system appeared in the foreign press, and not in the domestic media. Apparently, the reason for this was the good connections of the foreign author with the intelligence structures, which allowed B. Gertz to quickly obtain information about a promising Russian project.

If B.Gertz's sources provided him with the correct information, then we can talk about certain successes of the Russian defense industry. The existence of a project to modernize the existing missile defense system became known in 2010 year. Now there is information about the conduct of the first successful launch. At the same time, the two previous launches were unsuccessful.

Most of the information about the project "Nudol" is not yet subject to disclosure. According to the available fragmentary data, the main task of the project is to create a promising interception system. It should contain a new anti-missile with a launcher, as well as some aids, such as radar detection and guidance, etc. It can be assumed that the new anti-missile system will work as part of the existing complex and receive target designation from existing radars, such as Don-2Н. However, this requires a new interceptor missile and launcher.

In January, the corporate calendar of the Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern was published on 2015, one of the pages of which was attended by a drawing of a previously unknown rocket complex. Experts have suggested that the figure shows the launcher of the missile complex being created in the framework of the Nudol project. If this assumption is true, then in the foreseeable future, a six-axle self-propelled machine with a lifting launcher for missile transport and launch containers will be adopted. What could be other systems of the complex, including the rocket, is unknown.

For obvious reasons, even the approximate characteristics of the “Nudol” complex are not subject to disclosure. There are suggestions about the possibility of hitting ballistic targets at ranges of up to several hundred kilometers, but verification of such information is currently not possible. Type of rocket engines, guidance systems, etc. same secret. The lack of detailed information about the project does not allow to draw any conclusions, although it is a good ground for forecasts and speculations.

The Russian military and defense industries are in no hurry to publish the details of the Nudol project. Because of this, in various discussions there are a variety of assumptions of the most different kinds, some of which may eventually be plausible. In addition, the general atmosphere of secrecy does not allow even with confidence to speak about the veracity of the information of The Washington Free Beacon. However, this does not prevent foreign experts from trying to assess the risks associated with the emergence of a promising Russian anti-satellite system. In addition, they receive a kind of confirmation of their opinion on the need for the implementation of certain projects.

In the current situation, against the background of the lack of full-fledged confirmed data, the publication of foreign press about Russian projects is of great interest, but it cannot be said that their appearance is connected with the work of our defense industry. The reason for their appearance may be the desire of foreign industry to receive orders for the implementation of new projects, which is why there are publications with "frightening" information. Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out that 18 November really had the first successful launch of a promising Russian antimissile, and the new project was successfully progressing to a successful conclusion, thanks to which in the foreseeable future new systems of anti-missile defense will be adopted.


Based on:
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-conducts-successful-flight-test-of-anti-satellite-missile/
http://tass.ru/
http://rg.ru/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-806.html
Author:
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. bad
    bad 8 December 2015 07: 07 New
    0
    In the current situation, against the background of the lack of full-fledged confirmed data, the publication of foreign press about Russian projects is of great interest, but it cannot be said that their appearance is connected with the work of our defense industry. The reason for their appearance may be the desire of foreign industry to receive orders for the implementation of new projects, which is why there are publications with "frightening" information. Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out that 18 November really had the first successful launch of a promising Russian antimissile, and the new project was successfully progressing to a successful conclusion, thanks to which in the foreseeable future new systems of anti-missile defense will be adopted.
    ..something like that our scientists construct and experience recourse you don’t even need to go to grandma laughing ..Our defenders are foolish good but the adversary must probably strain his head off a bummer .. since the times of the USSR .. relaxed? - get .. laughing
    1. War and Peace
      War and Peace 8 December 2015 12: 15 New
      -1
      anti-satellite missiles are not so complicated - they are just large missiles capable of reaching distant satellites, the same VOEVODA in the form of ROCKOT is quite flying into space, the TOPOL is solid propellant is the same thing, it can be adapted to enter geostationary orbit, to shoot down Amer’s ZhPS satellites. The main thing here is to DETECT the SATELLITE, and a satellite is a thing that does not maneuver, is not protected, so it’s possible to shoot down satellites, but it will cost a lot ...
      1. Pilot
        Pilot 8 December 2015 17: 46 New
        0
        Quote: War and Peace
        able to reach distant companions

        Drunk to the tip of the nose, it can not be reached.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. spolo
    spolo 8 December 2015 07: 24 New
    +6
    It was necessary to sign an agreement on peaceful space .. They took care ...
  3. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 8 December 2015 07: 31 New
    16
    By launching the Nudol rocket, Russia joins China, which is also developing special weapons to attack objects in outer space.

    I think this is China, having launched an anti-satellite missile, it has come a little closer to Russia.
    1. FM-78
      FM-78 9 December 2015 00: 10 New
      +1
      Unfortunately, at the moment, this is not so.
      1. Aleks Berg
        Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 37 New
        0
        FM-78 Fortunately, it is.
  4. Wedmak
    Wedmak 8 December 2015 08: 04 New
    +2
    Whether our 53Т6 rocket was mounted on the chassis? With the appropriate revision of course.
    1. Nik_One
      Nik_One 8 December 2015 08: 47 New
      +2
      The picture shows the appearance of the launcher of the S-500 complex.

      And in the article of the "foreign press" it was said about the missile defense system, which we have one and protects the Moscow region.
      1. neri73-r
        neri73-r 8 December 2015 13: 21 New
        +2
        Quote: Nik_One
        which we have alone and protects the Moscow region.


        Not the Moscow region, but the Central Industrial District! Where, of course, includes the Moscow region.
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 8 December 2015 19: 13 New
        0
        So with 500 and will protect Moscow and the region - all 10 divisions will be placed in the Moscow region.
        1. Aleks Berg
          Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 13: 41 New
          0
          CERHJ
          It is only necessary to add that the Americans illuminate their targets with "beacons", moreover, they use geodetic missiles for purposes, and at the same time, the accuracy of hitting antimissiles does not exceed 0,35
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 8 December 2015 17: 50 New
      +1
      Quote: Wedmak
      Whether our 53Т6 rocket was mounted on the chassis? With the appropriate revision of course.

      If you are talking about the S-500, it’s too early to talk about it. Of course, the A-235 developments will be used in the development of a new air defense system, but the S-500 missile will be different. The A-235 will replace the A-135 missile
      Best regards hi
  5. Teplohod
    Teplohod 8 December 2015 08: 17 New
    -2
    It would be better to launch hundreds of thousands of satellites 10 cm in diameter using one carrier into orbit, such as a transforming sphere (like mines scatter, or as a pneumatic device that randomly scatters balls in vertical and horizontal planes, and in orbit a launched satellite from thousands of mini-satellites shoot), which transmit both the signal and surveillance. Let the enemy create hundreds of thousands of anti-satellite missiles. And even better, if the whole world was tied up for our food, instead of oil, the hungry would not argue for a long time. And the instrument of retaliation needs something like a destroyer of the ozone layer. You’ll restore horseradish, and sooner or later everything will die out.
  6. Old26
    Old26 8 December 2015 08: 41 New
    +7
    The article is basically about nothing. Not in the sense of claims to the author. There are simply no data on this system, only rumors. It is not even reliably known whether there was a test.
    Figure launcher - this is a pretty good joke from the developer.

    Quote: Wedmak
    Whether our 53Т6 rocket was mounted on the chassis? With the appropriate revision of course.

    If you mean, the above chassis is not. Any container is afraid that it will spread when launching this interceptor ...

    Quote: Teplohod
    It would be better to launch hundreds of thousands of satellites 10 cm in diameter using one carrier into orbit, such as a transforming sphere (like mines scatter, or as a pneumatic device that randomly scatters balls in vertical and horizontal planes, and in orbit a launched satellite from thousands of mini-satellites shoot), which transmit both the signal and surveillance. Let the enemy create hundreds of thousands of anti-satellite missiles. And even better, if the whole world was tied up for our food, instead of oil, the hungry would not argue for a long time. And the instrument of retaliation needs something like a destroyer of the ozone layer. You’ll restore horseradish, and sooner or later everything will die out.

    And what dates is this garbage with a diameter of 10 centimeters? Signal to transmit? And at what distance? What will the transmission of such a signal give? Observation lead ??? Well, you bent here, having read fiction. What can be stuck in a sphere with a diameter of 10 cm? What sensors ???

    Of course, it would be possible to tie the world on our food, but there is only one misfortune, sadness. We ourselves sometimes buy this food ...

    And the destruction of the ozone layer ... A fairy tale has been operating smoothly for decades. What did not forbid under this case. And freon, and desondorants. They scared a giant hole over the South Pole. However, that was all. Silence. And why? Yes, this hole dragged on by itself. And there is no possibility of destroying the ozone layer over a large territory at the same time - so far there are no such technologies and opportunities
    1. podpolkovnik
      podpolkovnik 8 December 2015 09: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: Wedmak
      Whether our 53Т6 rocket was mounted on the chassis? With the appropriate revision of course.
      If you mean, the above chassis is not. Any container is afraid that it will spread when launching this interceptor ...

      And nothing, that 53Т6 originally located in TPK?
      The transportation and storage of antimissiles in the silo is carried out in a transport-launch container, in which all technological work is performed to check the antimissile on the technical position, the storage of the antimissile on the technical and in silo, transportation and launch of the antimissile. TPK is sealed. Inside it is maintained the necessary temperature, pressure and humidity, which allows for a long time to store antimissiles in the open air, in vertical and horizontal position. When transporting and storing, the TPK at both ends is closed with special covers, which makes it possible to use the heat-heating system connected to the conveyor for heating the rocket in the TPK. When installed in the silo, the covers are removed. The launch of the anti-missile missile system is made from the closed TPC, for which it is closed in front of a special rubber cap, and from the back - with a rubber bottom. When launching the anti-missiles, the front cover and the bottom of the TPCs break simultaneously, respectively, with the toe of the anti-missile and the gas jet of the engine. The automatic test stations for checking the 51Т6 and 53Т6 (AKIPS) interceptors were made by DMZ. For the transportation of the TPK with the rocket and the installation of the TPK on the charging machine, the transport vehicle 5Т93 on the MAZ-543М chassis is used. The machine is equipped with a rocket heating system for the winter season.

      Taken from here http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/53t6/53t6.shtml
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 8 December 2015 10: 54 New
        0
        And nothing, that 53Т6 originally located in TPK?

        Therefore, I have a postscript "with revision" there. If it is an anti-satellite weapon, it does not need a high muzzle velocity. But at a height it may already be needed. Therefore, it is quite possible to modify the existing rocket, putting, say, one more stage. This is of course true ... inferences with a lack of information.
        1. podpolkovnik
          podpolkovnik 8 December 2015 11: 47 New
          0
          Quote: Wedmak
          And nothing, that 53Т6 originally located in TPK?

          Therefore, I have a postscript "with revision" there. If it is an anti-satellite weapon, it does not need a high muzzle velocity. But at a height it may already be needed. Therefore, it is quite possible to modify the existing rocket, putting, say, one more stage. This is of course true ... inferences with a lack of information.

          If the "old" PR will be used in the A-235, then only with a new engine (marked 53T6M, sharpened under the "head" with a high-explosive / special warhead, in the same TPK, with the replacement of 53T6 as it is fired / extended I also know that a new transport vehicle was tested for it, on the basis of KAMAZ, with the function of an installer, that is, instead of 5T93 and 5T92 there will be a single vehicle.
    2. podpolkovnik
      podpolkovnik 8 December 2015 12: 04 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      If you mean, the above chassis is not. Any container is afraid that it will spread when launching this interceptor ...

      I will answer you vague ... wink
      According to some sources, by 1990, R&D was carried out to create a mobile modification of the PRS-1M / 53T6M (Chief Designer - PI Kamnev) with a launcher based on a 6-axle MAZ-547 chassis similar to the Pioneer MRBM launcher.
  7. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 8 December 2015 08: 57 New
    +5
    The missile of the A-235 Nudol complex will have to replace the A-135 Amur missile defense system of Moscow, which is currently in service. The head of the US Air Force space command, General John Heiten, said in November that Russia and China are developing weapons that could threaten vital US satellites.http://news-front.info/2015/12/05/rossiya-uspeshno-zapustila-novejshuyu-sverxsek
    retnuyu-raketu-ubijcu-sputnikov-a-235-nudol /
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 8 December 2015 18: 19 New
      0
      This "barrel" does not even have any lifting mechanisms.
      1. Spnsr
        Spnsr 8 December 2015 22: 03 New
        0
        Quote: Bayonet
        This "barrel" does not even have any lifting mechanisms.

        what for? this barrel is immersed in the mine
  8. Old26
    Old26 8 December 2015 09: 08 New
    +3
    Quote: Nik_One
    The picture shows the appearance of the launcher of the S-500 complex.

    And in the article of the "foreign press" it was said about the missile defense system, which we have one and protects the Moscow region.

    In the picture, generally HZ that. This is a drawing from the 2015 calendar Fake, not a launcher. I have already figured out this drawing many times in various forums ... We took the Topol launcher as a basis and worked on it in Photoshop
  9. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 8 December 2015 09: 24 New
    +2
    Another "cry" commissioned by the US military-industrial complex, money is very hot! And why not fantasize with one word "Business and nothing personal"! Yes, our scientists are constantly working to strengthen our security, and given the fact that they (the United States and their lackeys) are constantly arranging against us, the Russian military-industrial complex is obliged to respond to all their follies with serious developments! After all, the same American politicians do not hesitate to trumpet the whole world about their plans to destroy Russia and are doing everything for this! But they constantly forget about what Alexander Nevsky said: "... Whoever comes to us with a sword will die by the sword!"
    1. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 29 New
      0
      Well, we don't need to consider our country so naive and stupid ... some developments worked out by our physicists and mathematicians were specially merged to the west, in the USA with defectors, spies, etc., which were intensively developed by them, huge funds were spent and, most importantly, time, time, time, and the branches were dead-end .... and there are many of them ... Judging from the outside, you can immediately see such as stealth technology based only on "materials" and "geometry", which was precisely reproduced in Lockheed F -117, or the use of laser weapons ... in the form that the Americans were hooked on, from the "Star Wars" theme - incredibly beautiful and effective, terribly expensive, but terribly little sense ...
  10. kirgudu
    kirgudu 8 December 2015 10: 17 New
    +1
    The author's talent to write so much text to say that everything is classified and we do not know anything.
    1. podpolkovnik
      podpolkovnik 8 December 2015 11: 49 New
      0
      Quote: kirgudu
      The author's talent to write so much text to say that everything is classified and we do not know anything.

      You have already spoken so much in the comments that it is time to call your comrades ...
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 8 December 2015 18: 21 New
        0
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        You have already spoken so much in the comments that it is time to call your comrades ...

        From The Washington Free Beacon? Maybe something new will show! smile
  11. pascal309
    pascal309 8 December 2015 10: 18 New
    +1
    In general, the new air defense / missile defense system looks like this
    S-500 / S-1000 is mainly missile defense.
    It can carry four new 40N6 missiles with a range of 600 km, also old 40N6 missiles from S-400 with a range of 400 km, plus missiles from S-300 48N6E3 48N6D 48N6DM or an analogue with a range of 150/200/250 km. This is mainly a missile defense weapon, but can also be used to destroy airborne command posts or radar aircraft, for example.
    Also, the S-500 (like the S-300 and S-400) can take, instead of each heavy missile, a quadruple launcher with 9M96E2 missiles with a range of 120 km and 9M96E2M with a range of 135 km. There is also a medium-range missile 9M96E 40 km, created for South Korea, but since it has almost the same mass-dimensional characteristics, it makes no sense to use it in domestic systems.
    And there is the S-1000, which is presented in the photograph. It uses the main components from the S-500 (the same tractor, for example, or a control machine) but carries anti-satellite / anti-missile weapons. (though I thought it was one missile, but apparently wrong) 45T6 missiles from the A-235 missile defense system. (Of course, modernized business) Launch range of 3500 km, can bring down both missiles and satellites. The first echelon missiles carry a nuclear warhead, the second a conventional one (the new system allows you to hit exactly on target)
    Next comes the S-350 system, which is a direct replacement for the S-300, can carry 12 9M96E2M missiles, as I already wrote, with a range of 135 km. Instead of each missile, you can install a quad launcher for the 9M100 missile. The short-range missile, made on the basis of the RVVMD missile, has a launch range of 10-15 km (there is no exact data on the Internet) is intended for self-defense of the anti-aircraft complex from enemy ammunition (anti-radar missiles, just guided, etc.) It has a thermal seeker (homing head) ) plus radio correction.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. pascal309
    pascal309 8 December 2015 10: 20 New
    0
    In general, the new air defense / missile defense system looks like this
    S-500 / S-1000 is mainly missile defense.
    It can carry four new 40N6 missiles with a range of 600 km, also old 40N6 missiles from S-400 with a range of 400 km, plus missiles from S-300 48N6E3 48N6D 48N6DM or an analogue with a range of 150/200/250 km. This is mainly a missile defense weapon, but can also be used to destroy airborne command posts or radar aircraft, for example.
    Also, the S-500 (like the S-300 and S-400) can take, instead of each heavy missile, a quadruple launcher with 9M96E2 missiles with a range of 120 km and 9M96E2M with a range of 135 km. There is also a medium-range missile 9M96E 40 km, created for South Korea, but since it has almost the same mass-dimensional characteristics, it makes no sense to use it in domestic systems.
    And there is the S-1000, which is presented in the photograph. It uses the main components from the S-500 (the same tractor, for example, or a control machine) but carries anti-satellite / anti-missile weapons. (though I thought it was one missile, but apparently wrong) 45T6 missiles from the A-235 missile defense system. (Of course, modernized business) Launch range of 3500 km, can bring down both missiles and satellites. The first echelon missiles carry a nuclear warhead, the second a conventional one (the new system allows you to hit exactly on target)
    Next comes the S-350 system, which is a direct replacement for the S-300, can carry 12 9M96E2M missiles, as I already wrote, with a range of 135 km. Instead of each missile, you can install a quad launcher for the 9M100 missile. The short-range missile, made on the basis of the RVVMD missile, has a launch range of 10-15 km (there is no exact data on the Internet) is intended for self-defense of the anti-aircraft complex from enemy ammunition (anti-radar missiles, just guided, etc.) It has a thermal seeker (homing head) ) plus radio correction.
    1. gas113
      gas113 8 December 2015 20: 06 New
      0
      and what about the missiles 77n 6n? They also seem to be sharpened under missile defense.
  14. pascal309
    pascal309 8 December 2015 10: 20 New
    0
    Also in the S-350 complex (and this is several cars and several launchers) there is a PU machine with seven quad (28 missiles) installations for the 9M100 missile.
    Next comes immediately the Pantsir-SM air defense system. It is intended for the defense of columns on the march, strategic targets, and support for long-range anti-aircraft systems. Both from enemy airplanes / helicopters, and from enemy ammunition, it can also hit ground / surface targets with great radio detectability (ships, buildings)
    It has several types, on a wheeled chassis the armor of a Typhoon car (although not a fact, I just saw Kamaz with a similar cabin and less armor) and on the Kurganets-25 chassis. Here are the links to the video
    [links disabled]
    [links disabled]
    As you can see in the video there are 2 (4) options, 12 missiles plus two guns, and 24 missiles without artillery. The missiles have a launch range of 24 km.
    And now about other export systems.
    Even if you do not take into account the S-300, then this is for example the Buk-m3, it carries 6 missiles from the Shtil marine system, which did not pass the competition with Polement / Redoubt. The missile is just a modernization of the missile from Buk. Buk-M3 medium-range system 75 km.
    It has a new chassis (already because of this it is clear that the unification of the chassis is not going to be put into service with Russia).
    Thor (various modifications) Quite a good, but outdated system, we have its functions (mainly intercepting enemy ammunition up to air bombs) and it covers the ZRAK Shell. It is intended only for export, the launch range of the latest missiles is 15 km (it’s already clear that the Shell is better) There are options both on the tracked chassis and on the wheeled (pictured) there is also an option for mounting on any chassis, or even on supports ( just take the crane and remove it from the chassis).
    There is still the Morpheus system, which seems to be planned to be adopted by Russia, but most likely this is an advertising trick for promoting the market.
    It is a launcher with a couple of dozen rockets from the TOP system (which already leaves little chance of being adopted) is designed to support older systems.
    Of uniqueness, a hemispherical radar that does not leave a typical cone / space like conventional systems.
    Well, the simplest MANPADS of Verba, which is distinguished by a particularly noise-protected GOS (standard fireflies do not knock a missile off target) and also built-in to the air defense network, the arrow displays data from all radars / posts and it transmits its data. Plus, the rocket is not blown up near the engine (the hottest spot on which the GOS is aimed) but under the cockpit.
    That's all
  15. Snail N9
    Snail N9 8 December 2015 12: 23 New
    -2
    Is it okay that the latest versions of "Standard-Block3-4" are already "quite a" missile defense?
  16. Abrekkos
    Abrekkos 8 December 2015 14: 46 New
    +1
    Nobody knows anything.
    One misinformation, speculation and horror stories.
    This makes me happy. Let them be afraid.
    When they find out, it will be too late. wink
  17. IAlex
    IAlex 8 December 2015 15: 20 New
    0
    The Yankus, as always in their repertoire, they can, but the rest can’t ... The fact that they are in the new doctrine violated the international agreement on the non-proliferation of strike weapons in space - they do not care for national interests, but the Russian Federation ate them in the fight against satellites .
  18. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 8 December 2015 15: 31 New
    +3
    In January 2015, the corporate calendar of the Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern was published, on one of the pages of which there was a drawing of a previously unknown missile system. Experts suggested that the figure depicts the launcher of a missile system created as part of the Nudol project.

    In fact, this is the PU of the complex, created within the framework of the Troll project, in accordance with the new strategy of information support for the actions of the Ministry of Defense - the strategy of massive thick trolling in the media. smile
    The offshore component of this project is known to be named "Status-6".
    1. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 20 New
      0
      Don't be so simple ..... this project is designed for such an "external drain" ... not everything is so simple ... we have been working on underwater robots for a very long time and even earlier than on robots on land. Why were samples of boats submerged to a depth of more than 1000m, and according to some reports, even deeper than 6000m were made .... And "Status-6" is - it seems - the logical completion of any work on such robots. What used to be the protective wall of the United States - the ocean - is now another component of the weapons of the US adversary, well, as another type of military that the United States will never have ....
  19. 2s1122
    2s1122 8 December 2015 17: 42 New
    0
    I was thinking here, because the mace has a flight range of probably 1500 or more. And the question is, you can shoot down satellites too. Missile launchers are your arguments.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 8 December 2015 18: 47 New
      0
      Quote: 2s1122
      I was thinking here, because the mace has a flight range of probably 1500 or more

      The maximum range is 8000-9300 km, depending on version. It is not intended to bring down satellites, but to water those who launch them! smile
      1. Aleks Berg
        Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 11 New
        0
        of course, you can adapt the "mace" to shoot down satellites ..... only in batches, about five hundred - a thousand, in one start from a submarine ... and all at once ..... and "ours and yours"
    2. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 12 New
      0
      of course, you can adapt the "mace" to shoot down satellites ..... only in batches, about five hundred - a thousand, in one start from a submarine ... and all at once ..... and "ours and yours"
  20. Megatron
    Megatron 8 December 2015 18: 51 New
    0
    As far as I remember, already with the S-400 could shoot down vehicles in space?
  21. Old26
    Old26 8 December 2015 20: 59 New
    0
    Quote: war and peace
    anti-satellite missiles are not so complicated - they are just large missiles capable of reaching distant satellites, the same VOEVODA in the form of ROCKOT is quite flying into space, the TOPOL is solid propellant is the same thing, it can be adapted to enter geostationary orbit, to shoot down Amer’s ZhPS satellites. The main thing here is to DETECT the SATELLITE, and a satellite is a thing that does not maneuver, is not protected, so it’s possible to shoot down satellites, but it will cost a lot ...

    Of course not so complicated. And so only 3 countries can make

    "Voivoda" in the form of "Roar" is strong. Shows your level of knowledge of the problem. In fact, the Rokot is a conversion version of the 15A30 / 15A35 rocket. And not "Voevoda" Which does not exist at all in the conversion version. Satellite is not maneuvering? A bold statement, you won’t say anything.
    Well, the output by "Topol" of the payload to the geostationary is generally enchanting

    Quote: podpolkovnik
    And nothing, that 53Т6 originally located in TPK?

    And TPK was in the mine. And no one ever talked about the state of the TPK after starting 53T6 from it with its accelerations

    Quote: Vadim237
    So with 500 and will protect Moscow and the region - all 10 divisions will be placed in the Moscow region.

    The S-500 is not yet on the horizon, but it is already known that there will be 10 divisions, and all will be in the Moscow region

    Quote: podpolkovnik
    I also know that a new transport vehicle was tested under it, on the basis of KAMAZ, with the function of an installer. Those. instead of 5T93 and 5T92 there will be a single machine.

    In KAMAZ? Are the truck dimensions sufficient to place a TPK on it?

    Quote: podpolkovnik
    I will answer you vaguely ... According to some reports, by 1990, R&D was carried out on the creation of a mobile modification PRS-1M / 53T6M (Chief Designer - PI Kamnev) with a launcher based on the 6-axle chassis MAZ-547 similar to the MRSD launcher " Pioneer".

    What was done (from the developments) and what was not - alas, there is no data. If there are materials - share
    1. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 08 New
      0
      probably it’s possible to adapt a slingshot to bring down satellites .... only instead of a bullet, adapt something flying high and fast, but in general it is not difficult.
  22. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 8 December 2015 21: 05 New
    0
    "Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out that the first successful launch of a promising Russian anti-missile missile was actually carried out on November 18, and the new project is successfully moving towards successful completion, thanks to which new missile defense systems will be adopted in the foreseeable future."

    Americans at first shit themselves with their BSU, and then they begin to fear our response! laughing
    1. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 06 New
      0
      Do not confuse only the day the first missile was successfully launched with the day when it was reported .... hypersonic missile, for example, the A-135 system, has existed for many years and from the first day of its creation had no analogues in accuracy and speed
  23. Alekspel
    Alekspel 8 December 2015 21: 38 New
    +2
    Everything is very cool. We launch, upgrade, and generally are not weakly armed. Only in the midst of an arms race do we forget that the army is only one element of the state that provides defense. And the subject of the state? People. Which lives mostly sucks. Again guns instead of butter? It would be necessary to somehow prioritize. No matter how you throw it into a firebox, everything will burn. And what people live on? Naebulin wants to freeze the funded part of pensions for a long time. Tighten the belts again? So you can drag and die. When the arms race was going on in the USSR, it was not so insulting because everyone was tightening their belts and the wealth of the director of the plant was not so different from the wealth of a skilled worker. And now? Why tighten your belts? So that Abramovich builds another yacht for himself? Or so that Miller will receive another 20 million dollars a month more than now? And the rest of the country, tighten their belts, and arm yourself to protect their billions? There seems to be something wrong here. And I’m already listening to Putin’s tales without enthusiasm. What are we fighting for? And with whom? With the same beggars as we ourselves? There China without capitalism rushing leaps and bounds, but they promise us everything. Previously, they promised communism, but now hell knows what. Someone will answer the question, what do we build and why does half the world hate us? And finally, when we’ll at least carry out gas and build roads in our villages, which are half extinct. Vladimir Vladimirovich, maybe it’s time to tackle the country, and only then rebuild the world order? Well, or somehow do it in parallel. Is it time for the government to apply Stalinist methods of government?
    1. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 13: 53 New
      0
      You with these incarnations go to church ..... There will not be a powerful army .... then this people will have to feed the army of ov ...
  24. Nick1953
    Nick1953 9 December 2015 17: 13 New
    0
    Vladimir Vladimirovich, maybe it’s time to tackle the country, and only then rebuild the world order? Well, or somehow do it in parallel. Is it time for the government to apply Stalinist methods of government?

    So I recall Vizbor:

    Poraketam and anti-rocket
    Anti anti rockets rushed ...
    In the blue glare of earthly light
    On the moon, five divisions fought ...
    1. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 14: 02 New
      0
      You with these incarnations go to church ..... There will be no powerful army .... then these people will have to feed someone else's army ...... Such calls have already led to rebellion in the year 17, intervention, war ....
  25. leon1204id
    leon1204id 10 December 2015 21: 16 New
    0
    I see the picture as in the article. (I mean the S-500)
    http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-373.htm
    The maximum interception range is supposedly 600 km. There will be no satellites in high orbit. (Well, someone will tell you the whole truth, as with Caliber missiles).
    Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA is already being tested, range up to 600km. Based on materials from regnum.ru8: 41 yesterday. (Block IA took out a satellite at an altitude of 240km)
    On the way Blok-IIB.
    Harness for a long time, but how do we go ...... wink
    1. Aleks Berg
      Aleks Berg 13 December 2015 13: 59 New
      0
      I took out the Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) satellite, but I got it .... only the satellite literally "shouted": "here I am, here I am." The satellite was "highlighted", and it did not maneuver during irradiation ... and the authors of the article do not write, but from what attempt it turned out ...