Military Review

Media: Moscow is counting on major contracts with Iran

35
After lifting the restrictions, Iran can significantly expand orders for Russian military products, said Vladimir Kozhin, presidential aide for military-technical cooperation.




“The interest of the Iranian side is very big. They really need a serious update of almost all of their armed forces. In all directions. Everything requires upgrading, updating. Considering that this is a large country with large armed forces, of course, we’ll talk about very large contracts, we’ll talk about billions. ”- quotes Kozhin RIA News.

“After the restrictions are lifted, a serious development is expected in the field of military-technical cooperation between the two countries,” he noted, adding that cooperation, as such, is already underway, only “in those areas that do not fall under the military embargo ".
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech
    Same lech 7 December 2015 10: 00
    +7
    “After the restrictions are lifted, serious development is expected in the field of military-technical cooperation between the two countries”


    Oh yeah ... IRAN has a long wish list .. modern and high-quality weapons are required that can compete on equal terms with the weapons of the USA, ISRAEL.

    It is clear that ISRAEL will begin to intensify its intelligence and put pressure on the KREMLIN through its channels ...
    A well-known bargaining will begin not only with IRAN but also with its neighbors who do not want to be hit, for example, by S-Z00.
    1. Finches
      Finches 7 December 2015 10: 05
      +12
      Why not! True, one must not forget to take into account the interests of Iraq - so to speak, subtly walk along that line of mutual relations in order to remain a good and most important interlocutor of both states! And you also don’t need to offend the Jews with our growing ties with Iran, there are still "a quarter of our people", and in general it is better to have Israel in, if not friends, then at least in neutral partners!
      1. sa-zz
        sa-zz 7 December 2015 10: 08
        +6
        There will be no REMOVAL OF SANCTIONS!
        Soon the banana will leave, this decision will be called - the decision of a wimp.
        They did not receive what the states wanted in exchange for concluding an agreement with Iran (is there hope?).
        1. cniza
          cniza 7 December 2015 11: 35
          +2
          Quote: sa-zz
          There will be no REMOVAL OF SANCTIONS!
          Soon the banana will leave, this decision will be called - the decision of a wimp.
          They did not receive what the states wanted in exchange for concluding an agreement with Iran (is there hope?).



          It seems that everything is going to this, they will not allow to cooperate with Russia.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. kitamo
        kitamo 7 December 2015 10: 31
        +2
        Quote: Finches
        True, one must not forget to take into account the interests of Iraq.


        what are * the interests of Iraq *? where does Iraq have interests if it is NOT independent?
      3. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 7 December 2015 10: 34
        +4
        Quote: Finches
        it is better to have Israel in, if not friends, then at least in neutral partners!


        "May God protect me from my friends, and I can handle the enemies myself."
        One variation of the phrase, Napoleon said.
        Such friends should be kept for tomatoes, but stronger. Some friends have not yet grabbed, but already swept. So Iran in BV is still our ally.
      4. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 7 December 2015 10: 43
        0
        Quote: The same Lech
        Oh yes ... IRAN has a long wish list ..
        - It's okay. Just so as not to get burned, as with Turkey, it is WANT to remember that their ayatollahs put Russia, as an enemy, in second place after the United States. And then they signed the Pact with Hitler, but did not think that he dashed off in the "MAY CAMPF".
        1. Don
          Don 7 December 2015 11: 23
          +1
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          - It's not bad. Just so as not to get burned, as with Turkey, it is desirable to remember that their ayatollahs put Russia, as an enemy, in second place after the United States.

          This was the first ayatollah. The current one seems to have a different opinion.
        2. Mig-31
          Mig-31 7 December 2015 12: 14
          +5
          that their ayatollahs put Russia as the enemy in second place after the United States. And then they signed the Pact with Hitler, but did not think that he dashed off in the "MAY CAMPF".
          Not Russia but the USSR because they compared communism with Satanism.
          1. Talgat
            Talgat 7 December 2015 21: 54
            +1
            Quote: Mig-31
            Not Russia but the USSR because they compared communism with Satanism


            Everything is right - not Russia but the USSR - and it’s just what I deserve - I wrote about this earlier - that our head of the ideology department of the Suslov Central Committee was an orthodox and a fanatic worse than an ayatollah - and in many ways it was his fault that they could not become allies - but everything went to this

            And Russia (like our Kazakhstan) Iran considers friends and allies - I was not too lazy to read speeches - everything from Sajidi to Rouhaniye, exceptionally with sympathy - friendly countries, etc.

            And interesting. that Kazakhstan started ahead of Russia - several years ago with the laying of railways, meetings of presidents and the course towards strategic partnership - and then now the Russian Federation pulled itself up - probably there was initially an agreement between Putin and Nazarbayev
      5. padded jacket
        padded jacket 7 December 2015 12: 36
        +2
        Quote: Finches
        there is still a quarter of our people,

        It is necessary to forget this expression for a long time as not corresponding to today's realities.
        If you approach this issue in this way, for example, in ANY state that arose as a result of the collapse of the USSR everywhere by 100% - our people. Either immigrants from the USSR or children and grandchildren of immigrants from the USSR live there.
        1. Finches
          Finches 7 December 2015 16: 45
          -1
          This is a metaphor! hi
      6. kare
        kare 7 December 2015 17: 53
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        And you still do not need to offend the Jews through chur with our growing ties with Iran, all the same there "a quarter of our people",


        "our people" in a ravine a horse eats up
        Yes will not be remembered by night
    2. volot-voin
      volot-voin 7 December 2015 10: 25
      +2
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Oh yeah ... IRAN has a long wish list .. modern and high-quality weapons are required that can compete on equal terms with the weapons of the USA, ISRAEL.

      It's time to help your potential ally in the region, without looking back to the west. In addition, it is mutually beneficial.
    3. good7
      good7 7 December 2015 10: 27
      +1
      Iran can say anything to Israel in words that they have any problems now and with Pakistan from where crowds of militants seep into them fiercely hating Shiites, and from Afghanistan this abomination creeps into them from Iraq. So, Israel is not a primary goal on this list! It is not known that Israel or Iran will fall first!
    4. Bongo
      Bongo 7 December 2015 10: 41
      +3
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      It is clear that ISRAEL will begin to intensify its intelligence and put pressure on the KREMLIN through its channels ...
      A well-known bargaining will begin not only with IRAN but also with its neighbors who do not want to be hit, for example, by S-Z00.

      Get hit by C-300? what How? This is a purely defensive system, how can it threaten Israel, unless of course Israeli planes themselves invade Iranian airspace?
      In addition, the production facilities on which it was possible to build the S-300P family of air defense systems are currently occupied by the S-400. If Iran is supplied with the S-300P, then most likely because of the presence of our Ministry of Defense. Of course, they will be repaired before that, their service life will be extended, and some "chips" which Iran does not need will be dismantled.
      1. Don
        Don 7 December 2015 11: 26
        0
        Quote: Bongo
        In addition, the production facilities on which it was possible to build the S-300P family of air defense systems are currently occupied by the S-400. If Iran is supplied with the S-300P, then most likely because of the presence of our Ministry of Defense. Of course, they will be repaired before that, their service life will be extended, and some "chips" which Iran does not need will be dismantled.

        It has already been stated that they will transmit the S-300PMU2. Most likely this is the S-300PS from the Russian air defense system upgraded to the S-300PMU2 level.
    5. Vikings
      Vikings 7 December 2015 10: 53
      +1
      Contracts, contracts, but it would not be bad to negotiate
      economic component. It’s not a secret to anyone that
      The basis of both Our and Iranian budgets is
      export of carbon-hydrogens. And here it is necessary to arrange everything
      points over and !!! Given the currency hunger of the Iranians, and they like
      You’ll be able to lure customers by dumping.
      sha excessive gullibility did not disappoint. Need to be precise and safe
      to say lately! That RUSSIA will not allow rotten wagging
      Persians in conquering the carbon-hydrogen market. And it will be tough
      stop this phenomenon in bilateral relations !!!
  2. venaya
    venaya 7 December 2015 10: 02
    +2
    The interest of the Iranian side is very large. They really need a major upgrade of almost all of their armed forces.

    Today, our goals are basically converging, and therefore I think that it would be a mistake not to use the current situation, given our situation in Syria, and on other issues.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. sisa29
    sisa29 7 December 2015 10: 05
    +6
    Key phrase if the embargo is lifted! So we are waiting for the west to allow us to trade? we kind of like that on all sides in sanctions, but for some reason we have to play by their rules.
    1. venaya
      venaya 7 December 2015 10: 07
      +2
      Quote: sisa29
      So we are waiting for the west to allow us to trade? we kind of like that on all sides in sanctions, but for some reason we have to play by their rules.

      And it wasn’t a fig to ruin its economy, then there wouldn’t be many such issues, but now there is what it is.
  5. Scandinavian
    Scandinavian 7 December 2015 10: 17
    +1
    The Western coalition struck a powerful airstrike on the Syrian army, there are dead


    The international coalition air force launched an airstrike on the Syrian army’s ammunition depot in the province of Deir ez-Zor in the east of the country, killing four Syrian soldiers and injuring 16, a source from the Syrian national militia told RIA Novosti.

    “An airstrike was struck at a depot with ammunition from the Syrian army in the province of Deir ez-Zor. According to our information, 4 soldiers were killed, 16 were injured. Damaged 2 tank. The aviation of the international coalition worked here, ”the source said.
    1. provincial
      provincial 7 December 2015 10: 33
      0
      here is the Western coalition, now it becomes clear why it was created. The cry "Assad must leave" is relevant for them, again double standards.
    2. veksha50
      veksha50 7 December 2015 10: 34
      +1
      Quote: Scandinavian
      The Western coalition struck a powerful airstrike on the Syrian army, there are dead


      If this is true - and most likely it is, then all the more you need to give a damn about the entire embargo and sell weapons to Iran at the peak of the coalition ...

      Most likely - the truth ... Yesterday I came across an article (sorry, I did not leave a link to it), in which it was indicated by dates and with numbers how, since January 2015, planes of "unidentified affiliation" regularly strike at Assad's troops and their depots. ..

      Unidentified belonging ... For some reason, sitting in the kitchen, I know that these are the planes of the Turks (by 70%), or "coalitions" (by the remaining 30%) ... In, you see, I did not even name Israel .. ...
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 7 December 2015 10: 47
        +1
        Quote: veksha50
        If this is true - but most likely it is,



        I would advise the minus one to rummage through Pravda.ru, there is a very interesting article on this subject with dates and numbers (as I said about this) ...
  6. veksha50
    veksha50 7 December 2015 10: 28
    +1
    "cooperation, as such, is already underway, only so far" in those areas that do not fall under the military embargo "" ...

    I don’t know, maybe I’m wrong, but it seems to me that Russia has long had to put a device on this embargo and sell Iran the weapons it needs ...

    We are still under sanctions, we are still spattered from head to toe ... There is no need to look back at the "civilized fucking world" ... The staff members do not look back and do not ask anyone ...
    1. Al_oriso
      Al_oriso 7 December 2015 12: 40
      +1
      Russia has long needed to put a device on this embargo and sell Iran the weapons it needs ...

      At least Iran will not look back at the United States.
  7. moskowit
    moskowit 7 December 2015 10: 28
    0
    Well, glorious ... "What is good for a Russian, death for a" German! "
  8. Andryukha G
    Andryukha G 7 December 2015 10: 32
    +2
    Russia quietly left and moved away from Iraq, its place was taken by the United States (and no one will let Russia go back there), therefore, chewing the s.o.p.l. in relations with Iran (which, moreover, is opposed to America with all its "soul fibers" ) and act more actively until the vacant place is taken by other nosy guys (for example, from China), so do not sleep in a hat, but go ahead - Russia should have its own global interests in the entire belt of border states. By the way, the NATO loop around Russia in the European part is tightening quietly and imperceptibly, in the near future Montenegro will be accepted or pulled by the ears in NATO, and there will be next in turn (in the next decade there will be Ukraine and Georgia, and then the Central Asian republics of the former USSR will take turns quietly It is not for nothing that the Americans are supplying their Kyrgyz embassy with a bunch of uncontrolled equipment).
  9. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 7 December 2015 11: 15
    0
    Moscow counts on major contracts with Iran
    Well! .. Just let's not shout that the Iranians are brothers forever.
    1. good7
      good7 7 December 2015 11: 19
      +1
      Not brothers, but on the same raft, and I take into account that they are Shiites, and in Russia Sunni Muslims are boiling points to a minimum, or the Saudi prince came to visit just like that.
      1. guzik007
        guzik007 7 December 2015 11: 52
        -1
        and in Russia, Muslims are Sunnis
        -------------------------
        You, my friend, watch the broom, it is ugly to insult millions of your fellow citizens. Write "Muslims" as it should be. Next time you will be banned for a week.
        1. good7
          good7 7 December 2015 14: 20
          -1
          Yeah, I’m not going to do well, but the language doesn’t turn to call them fellow citizens, they are painfully restless.
          1. guzik007
            guzik007 7 December 2015 20: 45
            0
            since I registered on the site, so at least name it, anomime. Here I am, for example, a Muslim, and I suspect that I have done much more for the country than you, dear anonymous. Maybe you were not lucky with your neighbors, so move to Tatarstan and after some time you will be surprised to think that you don’t distinguish between Tatars and Russians and don’t divide society by faith.
  10. iouris
    iouris 7 December 2015 11: 19
    -2
    I believe that Iran will be supplied on credit. We have money - chickens do not peck.
  11. PatriotKZ
    PatriotKZ 7 December 2015 11: 44
    +2
    Buying weapons from the Russian Federation, which do not fall under the military embargo, I think Iran is enough for a start.
  12. Lex.
    Lex. 7 December 2015 12: 06
    +1
    Large contracts for Russian loans and $ 7 billion
    1. BABA SHURA
      BABA SHURA 7 December 2015 17: 02
      +1
      In exchange for oil
  13. Mig-31
    Mig-31 7 December 2015 12: 09
    +4
    Quote: Finches
    Why not! True, one must not forget to take into account the interests of Iraq - so to speak, subtly walk along that line of mutual relations in order to remain a good and most important interlocutor of both states! And you also don’t need to offend the Jews with our growing ties with Iran, there are still "a quarter of our people", and in general it is better to have Israel in, if not friends, then at least in neutral partners!

    A quarter of your people in the hardest 90s abandoned their homeland and went to the promised land! So to say "How many wolves do not feed everything in the forest howls"
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 7 December 2015 12: 48
      +1
      Unfortunately, sanctions against Iran will remain in effect for about 5 years, and the little we can supply is air defense systems, electronic warfare systems, various radar systems, and so on, that is, non-offensive weapons.
      Therefore, there is only one way out of the organization of arms production in Iran with our help - for example, messages have already slipped that we will develop a fighter for it.
    2. Finches
      Finches 7 December 2015 20: 39
      -1
      Judging by the flag - in the hardest 90s your people left the country, the USSR, to their own devices, tearing it to pieces .... However, to justify you, the Kazakhs were not alone in their desire for independence ... Now we have that we have, but still Kazakhstan - somewhere around 90% of our people ...hi
      1. Talgat
        Talgat 7 December 2015 22: 03
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        Judging by the flag - in the most difficult 90 years, it was your people who left the country, the USSR, to their own devices, tearing it to pieces ....


        Either you write out of ignorance - or you lie

        in the 90 years of 3 the traitor in Belovezhskaya Pushcha was killed by the USSR - and the Kazakhs were not even invited there - then everyone left the USSR - and by the way Kazakhstan was the last - that is, we can generally consider ourselves the last republic of the Union - left alone when everyone fled

        Nazarbayev was said to have ambitions for the 2 or 3 post in the Kremlin, but he didn’t run away from the Union. and surveys of the population showed precisely in us and in Central Asia the highest percent of support for the USSR

        And then it was our leadership that initiated the reverse integration - but under Yeltsin, Russia did not listen to the Kazakhs - but looked in ... Europe

        fortunately, then sane people came and listened to Nazarbayev
        1. Finches
          Finches 8 December 2015 09: 15
          -1
          "You are lying" is not a tactful word for a two-way dialogue! And the phrase with the ostentatious correction "our people", "to your people", says that you indicate your superiority, that the same does not paint you as an interlocutor. Moreover, I took a line from Vysotsky's song about Israel. As for Kazakhstan, the fact remains! He was the first to leave the USSR or the last - you must admit that this is not at all important!
          By the way, Nazarbayev, however, like Yeltsin, was a member of the CPSU Central Committee, if that tells you something ....
  14. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 7 December 2015 13: 17
    +1
    If we conquer the markets of the Middle East through successive actions, we will have very great trade and economic relations. And these relations can be much more solid than they were with grief Europe!
  15. kodxnumx
    kodxnumx 7 December 2015 13: 56
    +1
    Quote: The same Lech
    “After the restrictions are lifted, serious development is expected in the field of military-technical cooperation between the two countries”


    Oh yeah ... IRAN has a long wish list .. modern and high-quality weapons are required that can compete on equal terms with the weapons of the USA, ISRAEL.

    It is clear that ISRAEL will begin to intensify its intelligence and put pressure on the KREMLIN through its channels ...
    A well-known bargaining will begin not only with IRAN but also with its neighbors who do not want to be hit, for example, by S-Z00.
    Yes, send this to the United States and all of it with three letters, and to establish a complete relationship, the United States generally equips NATO terrorists, where are the terrorists and where is Iran! What’s called, feel the difference.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. Sasha75
    Sasha75 7 December 2015 14: 13
    +1
    And who else besides us that sells the good things mercilessly as well as to Libya, so that the equipment stops working on a satellite signal it can, but not fools, to buy. The main thing here is that they pay with money, not promises, and they have the money they have our equipment there, both ground and air. Armored vehicles during the war with Iraq took trophies. The air itself flew into them in the form of deserters and just from the war the pilots from Iraq during the first desert storm were welcome guests, especially with newer equipment))). And first of all, they need air defense defense equipment and ground on what we are doing now and do the bulk of the money; we won’t sell;