Especially for some reason Donetsk.
No longer news. At the next closed meeting of the People’s Council of the DPR, which was already held as usual without cameras and the media, the deputy mandate was denied Hellas B. Shaftner. Yes, the one whose interviews we published in connection with the Purgin-Aleksandrov case.
In fact, the last active participant of the Russian Spring was removed. Removed tishkom, privately. Indeed, why to cover such events? In the DNI is still great! The Republic is confidently taking the path of development and creation. And the fact that traitors and provokers turned out to be in its ranks is a temporary phenomenon, and the true patriots of Donbass will fight with them, and they will fight.
To the very procedure of exile Shaftner. This, I may say so, could be called amusing if people had not disappeared after such procedures. There is a recording made during this "meeting". The quality leaves much to be desired, but everything that is needed is quite real.
Shaftner was accused of the fact that she was not Shaftner (although this is her real name), that she was not registered in the Donetsk region (this is true, she was born in Zaporozhye), and that she had forged documents in order to be elected to the National Assembly of the DPR.
Allegedly, three passports for different surnames were withdrawn from Shaftner’s house - and thus, according to the version of the People’s Council, she is a saboteur. It is difficult to say what right the National Assembly assigned itself to the investigative functions. For all the movements did not come from the MGB of the DPR, but from the National Assembly.
In the session hall showed some copies of the left passports, no one has provided these. Yes, Pushilin said that he has the originals. But ... I do not even want to continue.
Since Shaftner is not registered on the territory of the DPR, it means she is a saboteur. Very logical conclusion. It sounded in one of the cues in the hall.
Well, very original. So, we can conclude that everyone who is not a native of Donetsk region is a potential saboteur.
And one moment. The record repeatedly mentions a certain Natalya Anatolyevna (Pshenichnaya), who "lost" the Shaftner case. That is, it is unknown where all the results of the checks of the candidate for the deputies of the LPR Shaftner through the MGB and the prosecutor's office are unknown. And there appeared a certain “person without a passport”, behaved like he made his way to the People’s Council of the DPR. Accordingly, her at and the basement! For further clarification. A mandate in the furnace stories.
But Wheat - "vegetable", if judged biased. I doubt that what she did was her personal initiative. There is another figure who ordered her to accomplish what Ivanishina did.
So who is this man? And the face of something very familiar. Catherine Gubareva! Yes, yes, the same one. The former main "nurse" of the DPR humanitarian aid, arrived in Russia with one bag, and departed on two trucks and with its own fleet of not cheap jeeps. Well, the story of how her hubby had an accident, we all remember. And on what too.
So, now Gubareva, who actually headed the Free Donbass faction (who was against, we note, he really WAS a deputy), demonstrates a complete understanding with Pushilin. And, by the way, many in the DPR who are well informed in the events taking place, note that the Pushilin-Gubarev duet very amicably and actively gets rid of those whose understanding of the processes taking place in the DPR does not coincide with Pushilin's opinion.
Shaftner is not an isolated case. Also in a closed ballot, Alexey Bogdanov was spared the mandate. With him, too, everything is more or less clear. The Cossack should fight, and not to cut the truth-womb in parliament. So also removed.
The list of the National Assembly of the DPR “Free Donbass” is getting shorter. In principle, this is normal. Normal in any developed country (in theory) is the practice of depriving a deputy of the mandate. And, if it is furnished from a legal point of view flawlessly, then nobody sees anything terrible in this normal country.
The question is the DNI normal country and the country in general, leave it open.
In principle, what the so-called “people's council” is today from the point of view of legality does not stand up to criticism. But - if it suits everyone in the DPR, it means that there is something in it.
In the end, this is already an internal affair of the Pitmen themselves. They chose these deputies, they, as they say, and reap the benefits of the work of their elected representatives. And our business is to draw the appropriate conclusions.
The conclusions are not very pleasant. At first, they "once" departed from themselves the invented Constitution, then began to throw out deputies under various (and not always decent looking) pretexts. What's next? Then what?
It is clear that this is most likely the last action. Then everything will be like in the winter on a frozen lake - quiet and peaceful. The remaining deputies will calmly and without nerves vote for the Pushilin-Gubarev bloc and sit on poles evenly and without frills. In order to avoid a repetition of the fate of Purgin, Shaftner and others.
And it will be time for prosperity and development in the DPR.
And two more words about Shaftner. Yes, the people's representatives of the DPR who voted for the deprivation of its mandate know better, of course, what kind of person she is. We decided that she was a wolf in sheep's clothing - God be their judge. If Zaporizhzhya registration is such a weighty argument ... And what then would not arrest all non-residents of the Donetsk region, who occupy some leadership posts?
Maybe, by the way, Motorola knowingly so quickly rushed to Russia? Perhaps some information justifying such abrupt movements came to him?
If two contusions, shrapnel wounds, burns received at the Donetsk airport, all this is not enough to prove loyalty to Shaftner ... well, excuse me. In defense of Hellas Borisovna, I will only say that when she rushed along the entire front line, collecting material as a member of the commission of war crimes of the Ukrainian junta against Donbass, Mrs. Gubareva was busy with humanitarian aid and spread her fingers in Russia with a fan.
Apparently, each boots its season. Well, again, it is not for us to judge who is now more necessary to the people of Donbass.
But apparently, such thoughts are visited not only my head. There, above, they also think and draw the appropriate conclusions. This is me already in the subject of the failed "Crimean scenario" for LDNR. And at the top they know much more. And we can only see the results from our bell bells. Actually, we see.
It turned out how it happened. Let the voters who voted for the Free Donbass assess the internal politics of this social movement. But they can do this only in the next election. In the meantime, let them swallow everything they want to please the wife of the former "people's governor of Donbass" Ekaterina Gubareva. Well, the figure "MMM" Pushilin. In the end, it was they who voted for them, not us.
Discussing this topic with one of my Donetsk friends, I “made a catch” from him: in Russia there are more crooks and thieves. And (perhaps) and more mayhem.
Indisputable remark. Indeed, we have only more. We seem to be more ourselves. But there is a small difference. This Russia contains LDNR. Humanitarianism, energy, salaries and pensions. That's when it becomes at least on an equal footing - then we will take over one and all. In the meantime ...
So far we can only observe what will be built in the DPR. Donetsk People's Republic or Donetsk branch MMM. Or an analogue of warehouses on Shchors in Rostov. God forbid, of course.
By the way, on many Ukrainian websites the information about these resignations caused almost satisfaction.
A recording of what is happening in the assembly hall of the National Assembly of the DPR can be downloaded and listened here: https://vk.com/doc257340766_437072771?hash=7fb27ff6264eb42f6a&dl=c4a87c153a6992c9fe.