General: a new nuclear bomb will be more convenient to use

183
The new B61-12 bombs, which are supposed to be placed in Europe, will be more accurate, and therefore more convenient for making decisions about their use, said the former commander of US strategic forces, James Cartwright.



“The B-61 nuclear bombs are now deployed at six bases in five countries. The release of the first B61-12 bombs from the conveyor is planned for 2020, 2024 is supposed to be made by 480. After that, some of them will be installed and deployed in Europe on new F-35A Lightning II fifth-generation fighter-bomber aircraft and temporarily on older aircraft, ”the newspaper said. Look data from the Federation of American Scientists.

According to General Cartwright, “the B61-12 bomb will have increased accuracy that will be achieved through the guided tail, and the ability to use a smaller charge, which will reduce radioactive emissions.”

He noted that such characteristics "will be more convenient for the US President and decision-making on national security issues."

Last month, the US National Nuclear Security Administration announced the successful completion of the third final test of a modernized bomb at the Nevada test site.
  • Hyungwon Kang / Reuters
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

183 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +132
    5 December 2015 14: 10
    Thank you for the more humane bomb. We will try to respond with the same kindness.
    1. +45
      5 December 2015 14: 12
      What do you. This is not against Russia, it is against North Korea and the Isis !!!
      1. +23
        5 December 2015 14: 14
        Again, the old Soviet joke:
        ...
        - scare! thought Stirlitz.
        1. +32
          5 December 2015 14: 29
          It is necessary to answer the same.
          Deliver new bombs to our American friends.
          To Cuba. To Venezuela.
          By all means send a carriage of bombs to Syria.
          Kohl went such a booze!
          Kohl scored on non-proliferation!
          To walk, so to walk! To the full!
          With mushrooms for a snack!
          With nuclear! wassat

          Or should you suggest that your "partners" use your brain?
          Indeed, for something the Lord gave them to him!
          Or did he deprive the servants of the devil?
          1. +19
            5 December 2015 14: 37
            Quote: Temples
            It is necessary to answer the same.


            ... moreover, preventively!
            1. mvg
              -22
              5 December 2015 14: 58
              DIVAN SOLDIER (2), Baikonur (6), Rus2012 (2), Temples (4), etc.
              Comrades MARSHALS of the divan army .. question: ALL lessons are done? And if I check?
              1. +19
                5 December 2015 17: 47
                Quote: mvg
                And if I check?

                sign off later ...
              2. +7
                5 December 2015 21: 13
                mvg - THANKS! The level of "comments" is off scale, you + are big. SUGGESTING ALL CANCEL RACE FUCK. And publish comments with a nickname. And that's all.
                Alexander Romanov and other important persons - your reaction ????
                1. +7
                  5 December 2015 21: 51
                  Quote: Dmitry_24rus
                  mvg - THANKS! The level of "comments" is off scale, you + are big. SUGGESTING ALL CANCEL RACE FUCK. And publish comments with a nickname. And that's all.
                  Alexander Romanov and other important persons - your reaction ????

                  Exactly, the dullness of the cheers-marshals just rolls over. It's time to cancel all these epaulettes.
                  1. -7
                    5 December 2015 22: 05
                    Quote: mvg
                    DIVAN SOLDIER (2), Baikonur (6), Rus2012 (2), Temples (4), etc.
                    Comrades MARSHALS of the divan army .. question: ALL lessons are done? And if I check?

                    Quote: Dmitry_24rus
                    mvg - THANKS! The level of "comments" is off scale, you + are big. SUGGESTING ALL CANCEL RACE FUCK. And publish comments with a nickname. And that's all.
                    Alexander Romanov and other important persons - your reaction ????

                    Quote: Алексей_К
                    Exactly, the dullness of the cheers-marshals just rolls over. It's time to cancel all these epaulettes.

                    I will also make my contribution, the 2013 movie:
              3. Mih
                +3
                5 December 2015 22: 43
                Wow!!! Do you want to check? Check what? Are you a real teacher? Well, you're a dick. love
              4. +1
                6 December 2015 00: 14
                Does the word VRUYAF mean something to you?
          2. +24
            5 December 2015 14: 37
            Slowly missiles sail away into the distance, you don’t wait any longer, and although America is a little sorry, Europe is ahead! soldier
            1. -2
              5 December 2015 14: 59
              Quote: kot28.ru
              and although America is a little sorry, Europe is ahead!

              Europe and the States need to be swapped.
              1. +5
                5 December 2015 16: 22
                Quote: EvgNik
                Europe and the States need to be swapped.

                No need to change places. They all need at the same time, so that the brazen Saxons were not offended!
              2. +1
                5 December 2015 20: 18
                Do not. Otherwise, these s will live next to us.
              3. -3
                5 December 2015 21: 19
                "It is necessary to change places in Europe and the States."
                This is patriotism or e.b.s. (even Lavrov uses this word)? You, judging by the photo for 60. And judging by the koment, you do not have children and grandchildren and you live in Yakutia.
                WHAT DO YOU WRITE?
            2. +9
              5 December 2015 15: 50
              Quote: kot28.ru
              Slowly missiles sail away into the distance, you don’t wait any longer, and although America is a little sorry, Europe is ahead! soldier

            3. Mih
              +3
              5 December 2015 23: 17
              Everything happens for the first time, but in this case it is the last. Even assuming Sasha’s chance of an unrequited blow, Sasha herself will not survive this. As someone the giant of sex said that she could not stand the entry ...
              I mean, as a result of the Chernobol accident, a dust cloud bypassed the entire balloon. But this is just a flower. It is impossible to imagine that no missiles will be launched from the Russian Federation. Let's say that this is so, but then they all will explode in Europe. If Sasha thought that as in the times 1 and 2 the ocean would protect them, then this naivety makes me tender. The half-life of strontium 90 is a well-known value for everyone and, from this constant, you can’t hide in any shelter - there’s not enough life. In short - the apocalypse. If to summarize everything, then Sasha is a monkey with a grenade, which poses a real threat to the whole world. ISIS did not stand nearby. love
          3. +3
            5 December 2015 15: 36
            Or should you suggest that your "partners" use your brain?
            Indeed, for something the Lord gave them to him!
            Or did he deprive the servants of the devil?



            They have one goal to intimidate and they think that they will not reach the USA.
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. +2
            5 December 2015 15: 39
            Quote: Temples
            Kohl scored on non-proliferation!

            And to ban nuclear weapons tests?
            Quote: quote from an article
            Last month, the US National Nuclear Security Administration announced the successful completion of the third final test of a modernized bomb at the Nevada test site.

            It is necessary to conduct the test Status-6.
          6. +2
            5 December 2015 19: 56
            dear, YOU do not know the topic, or in good faith (God forbid 0 FORGET !!!!!!!!!!
          7. 0
            6 December 2015 09: 40
            Their brains to count bucks
        2. +16
          5 December 2015 14: 30
          Scared. Tomorrow I won’t go to work but to the draft board! wassat And these Exceptional Monkeys. It will be necessary once again to come to Berlin, Paris. phishington.
          BUT. Fuck already gone. These priyurki for 50 years anyway go crazy.
          Every time to occupy Berlin or what?
          1. +21
            5 December 2015 14: 35
            It will be necessary once again to come to Berlin, Paris. phishington.
            yes, the fact of the matter is that we need to go to Washington right away, and we are always bled in Europe, although we have no sharp contradictions with them - we live like queers with our values ​​and die out calmly and without our participation ...
            1. +4
              5 December 2015 15: 45
              Quote: lukke
              It will be necessary once again to come to Berlin, Paris. phishington.
              yes, the fact of the matter is that we need to go to Washington right away, and we are always bled in Europe, although we have no sharp contradictions with them - we live like queers with our values ​​and die out calmly and without our participation ...

              I agree. Let's give life with meaning. These buggers got it.
            2. +2
              5 December 2015 19: 03
              [img] https://yandex.ru/images/search?source=wiz&img_url=http://img0.joyreactor.c
              c/pics/post/%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD-%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%
              D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B2-%D0%BC%D0%B5%
              D0%B6%D0%B4%D1%83-%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B9-%D0%B8-%D0%BC%D0%B5
              %D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9-370630.jpeg&text=пролив имени сталина&noreask=1&pos=1&lr=193&rpt=simage[/img]
              Why do we need it? Give the strait to them Stalin !!!
              1. +9
                5 December 2015 19: 26
                Why do we need it? Give the strait to them Stalin !!!
                1. 0
                  5 December 2015 23: 48
                  Why do we need it? Give the strait to them Stalin !!!
                  good Here you showed the right picture here good Damn, what a pity that I can not ply you many times ++++++++++++++ !!!!!!!
          2. +9
            5 December 2015 16: 17
            Quote: Sterlya
            Every time to occupy Berlin or what?


            Yes, Berlin already occupied. And more than once. Paris was also occupied. And fundamentally, this did not resolve matters. So, a ceasefire is at best fifty. And headaches in the future for the winners. Fushington then dreams, at least for the coming years 70 - 80. But the battle for London was not. The cannonade on downing streets did not rattle. The Victory Banner did not fly at the Palace of Westminster. It's a pity.
            1. +2
              5 December 2015 19: 26
              Apparently it's time to fill the gap in the Naglosak itorii. Let the period of Russian occupation appear. Make friends with the Baltic states ...
            2. +4
              5 December 2015 20: 49
              But for the most part people do not know that all the troubles come from there.
              1. +1
                5 December 2015 20: 53
                Yes, exactly, this is true, and Freemasonry exists.
              2. -2
                5 December 2015 21: 06
                they all know very well-the Internet however. just all-democracy kitchen like in a scoop
          3. 0
            5 December 2015 19: 45
            Quote: Sterlya
            Scared. Tomorrow I won’t go to work but to the draft board! wassat And these Exceptional Monkeys. It will be necessary once again to come to Berlin, Paris. phishington.

            Have you started Who will let you go there? Such a cool one, but I know from experience that such more often than not verification are not frightened fools.
        3. +5
          5 December 2015 15: 35
          The motto of the poultry farm has been completely forgotten: "Hit America in the balls" :-)
        4. 0
          5 December 2015 20: 38
          Bursting ... brainwashed Stirlitz.) smile
      2. +8
        5 December 2015 14: 17
        The bomb to the target, still need to be delivered, but will they have time? ...
      3. +5
        5 December 2015 14: 51
        In the United States, hands itch from the desire to use preventive nuclear weapons. Once applied, why not try again.Or scare Russia with such an opportunity.
        Having YB in the arsenal and not using them is depressing for the Yankees.
        While everything in the world is going to the point that the States can risk, for the sake of asserting their hegemonism in the world, to use nuclear weapons, in some "hot spot".
        1. 0
          5 December 2015 15: 35
          If a gun is hanging on the wall, then according to the scenario it should be a bullet. Here in Hiroshima and Nagasaki pulnul. A simple shotgun bullets today (you know where). So is it. No wonder they want to import. And the influx of migrants into Europe does not scare them at all. I suspect the arming of monkeys with grenades is planned.
        2. 0
          5 December 2015 20: 56
          If they are sure that there will be no answers - they will apply - definitely !!!
      4. +2
        5 December 2015 15: 07
        General: a new nuclear bomb will be more convenient to use

        Against who??? But the general does not think that from this "whom" a "otvetka" can fly in, which will turn the abode of "democratic" upstarts into a vitrified deserts? AND?
        1. 0
          5 December 2015 18: 02
          The IMPACT component of the Russian Federation ALWAYS dominates OVER all NATO efforts - this is a guarantee of our fast and uncompromising development! am
          1. -1
            5 December 2015 18: 19
            If myrikosy themselves dug up enough MANY-HOUR shelters .. Of what I personally doubt it ..
            This means ALL absolutely ALL AMERICOS will be killed by our nuclear charges. Well, and in this statute, what remains for ordinary citizens of the USA to do? In a situation where the people of Russia do not pose THREATS to them ?? What?
            1. +1
              5 December 2015 20: 58
              You child and sick
          2. +4
            5 December 2015 20: 53
            Dominates? Oh well.
      5. +1
        5 December 2015 18: 00
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        What do you. This is not against Russia, it is against North Korea and the Isis !!!


        But they will be located in Europe. Us hypocrisy has no boundaries. Nothing personal. Like their classic - "Only business. Bolivar will not stand two"

        And when the North began to squeeze the South in the war in America and the Queen of England rushed to help the southerners, Our fleet approached and supported the North !!! Mark Twain then came to Russia as part of the delegation ... They swore with blood and Mom that we were brothers forever !!! But it all ended as always! Alas. No one has faith (((((
    2. +1
      5 December 2015 14: 36
      I hope Iskander has in stock humane special combat units! soldier
    3. +4
      5 December 2015 14: 38
      This club apparently does not even consider the use of such ammunition in the United States, well, okay, there will be another, environmental disaster in the form of giant tsunamis that will cause unacceptable damage.
      1. 0
        5 December 2015 22: 17
        Yes, they felt sorry for them - it was easy to destroy this hotbed of "democracy" (and even now not everything is lost) belay
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +4
      5 December 2015 14: 42
      Quote: ejov1976
      Thank you for the more humane bomb. We will try to respond with the same kindness.

      Our good will be kinder! The new Russian mobile soil rocket complex RS-26. According to experts, the minimum launch range of ICBMs is about 2 km. At the same time, telemetry of test launches RS-000 was presented to the American side, which clearly proves that the new missile belongs to the class of intercontinental ballistic and does not violate the START-26 and INF
      1. +8
        5 December 2015 15: 06
        Quote: Tim Coconuts
        Our good will be kinder!

        In the meantime ...
        On November 18, the first successful launch of an interceptor missile missile defense system NIR "Nudol" took place. After two unsuccessful attempts. The first successful interception in space by a P-222 rocket (product 14Ts033) .
        Here is the news. soldier And the fact that this mattress general squeezed it out is interesting for grandmothers with seeds at the entrance.
        1. +3
          5 December 2015 21: 07
          Quote: NEXUS
          And the fact that this mattress general squeezed it out is interesting for grandmothers with seeds at the entrance.



          Well, do not tell. The Yankees and Britons did not put their plans for the USSR, developed in 1945, under the cloth. They just made a small amendment - not in relation to the USSR, but in relation to Russia, i.e. us with you. The aggressive and treacherous policy of the Anglo-Saxons is clearly visible on the example of one clan - the Bush clan:
          (cry.)
      2. 0
        5 December 2015 15: 23
        Quote: Tim Coconuts
        minimum launch range of ICBMs is about 2 km

        And to the Polish borders from the borders of the Perm Territory At least 2 km. So everything is all right. Everything will be perfect. And nuclear storage sites in Europe are just at the perfect distance.
    6. +12
      5 December 2015 15: 34
      It's just some kind of shiz: a reduced nuclear warhead will be "more convenient" for the US president when making decisions. He really thinks that after he uses a nuclear bomb someone will figure out how many kilotons have exploded ??? Get it all at once. Keep the change.
    7. 0
      5 December 2015 16: 01
      I don’t know yet - but I have to answer them wrong. It is necessary to answer the guys from the USA - Vyv are wrong!
      1. +3
        5 December 2015 16: 53
        We do not promise to increase accuracy. We guarantee an increase in the power of a point. For the convenience of deciding a point
    8. +4
      5 December 2015 18: 03
      We have the most humane rocket, even before 2030, will stand in service and enter into the horror from which the Yankees write and scat in their dreams ... This horror - "Satan" is nicknamed ...
    9. +2
      5 December 2015 18: 18
      Quote: ejov1976
      Thank you for the more humane bomb.

      And then the bomb is pretty harmful

      • For half a century, the US Air Force has used the B61 thermonuclear bomb as its main type of nuclear weapon. True, from the thousandth arsenal in service in the next few years, only less than half of them will remain. But already in 2018, the B61-12 generation will receive GPS guidance modules. The latter can give the bomb accuracy comparable to today's high-precision bombs: the maximum deviation from the target is no more than 2 meters.
      • And although it would seem that in a nuclear explosion some 2 meters are not different, nevertheless, it lowers the power of the warhead and guarantees a high probability of hitting the target. This means that the power of the new B61-12 will be 10-50 kilotons, while the old version has 340 kilotons.
      • B61-12 - a formidable strategic weapon. This bomb is good in that the radioactive fallout from it is not very large-scale, and when aiming at underground bunkers it will not infect the terrain at all. In many countries, however, in the event of a surprise attack, thousands of kilometers of bunkers and tunnels have been dug, and the presence of such bombs by the enemy can make them useless.
      • At one time, the Pentagon refused to develop this type of weapon. But then he decided to continue development, mainly after failures in Afghanistan. The international community, however, cannot bring anything to the United States, because if you use legal terminology, only the old equipment is being modernized, nothing is being created upon the fact of the new. It seems that the B61, which are now located on the European continent, will soon leave it, but from the knowledge that there are several hundred B61-12 in the world, the threat of a nuclear attack does not become less.
      • The fact that about 2 billion dollars have already been allocated for work with B61-12, the "shelf life" of which will last at least until 2025 does not add to calm. Due to the small size and weight, the bomb can be installed on fighters, including the latest inconspicuous F-35, F-22. There is no doubt that it is easy to place it on the X-47B unmanned aircraft, which even becomes a formidable strategic weapon.
    10. 0
      5 December 2015 18: 30
      Quote: ejov1976
      Thank you for the more humane bomb. We will try to respond with the same kindness.

      He lived to the gray m @ dei, and instead of his head a block of wood. fool
    11. -2
      5 December 2015 19: 59
      Or maybe the other way around? Khrushchev blew up a 100 megaton, although the charge worked only by 25, he can notify the world of the creation of a world end of 100 Giga tons, just notify everyone about being put on combat duty from the heels of such lyalek, the probability of breaking a ball even with a couple will be 100%, warning everyone that not a single rocket will have time to fly, everything will end much earlier.
      1. 0
        5 December 2015 20: 42
        Quote: ostrom
        Or maybe the other way around? Khrushchev blew up a 100 megaton, although the charge worked only by 25, he can notify the world of the creation of a world end of 100 Giga tons, just notify everyone about being put on combat duty from the heels of such lyalek, the probability of breaking a ball even with a couple will be 100%, warning everyone that not a single rocket will have time to fly, everything will end much earlier.


        - And who from the current leadership will have the will to give such an order - "to press the red button"? Yes, no one! And the West is well aware of this. Stalin had nothing but a pair of boots and a jacket - he was not obsessed with material goods and was not chasing wealth; someone like him would not even think about it. And today - who? Dima-iPhone? Vova the void? Maybe Shoigu will be honored? Not even funny. So you can build at least one hundred thousand of these bombs, there will be zero sense from them.
        1. +3
          5 December 2015 20: 51
          Quote: Haettenschweiler
          And who from the current leadership will have the will to give such an order - "to press the red button"? Yes, no one!

          Boring voice:

          Nuclear weapons are deterrence weapons. The use of nuclear weapons by at least one country is likely to lead to a total nuclear war, followed by the destruction of most of the world's population. And also with bringing this Earth into a form unsuitable for living on it.

          Learn materiel before writing something Yes
          1. +2
            5 December 2015 22: 45
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            Learn materiel before writing something


            - Comrade, I probably didn’t express my point quite clearly. Nuclear weapons - weapons of deterrence, this is its main, but not the only goal. The secondary, so to speak, purpose of such weapons is to inflict irreparable and colossal damage to the enemy in the event that the army and navy were defeated and dispersed, as well as to retaliate in the event of a nuclear strike by the enemy. Is not it? But for a nuclear weapon to act as a deterrent weapon, the enemy must be one hundred percent sure that it will applied if necessary.
            1. +1
              5 December 2015 23: 00
              Quote: Haettenschweiler
              But for a nuclear weapon to function as a deterrent, the enemy must be XNUMX% sure that it will be used if necessary.

              Right. Two questions, with my answers:

              - Does nuclear weapons still work as a deterrent? IMHO yes.
              - So the enemy is confident that it will be used? IMHO yes.

              And what do we think about Putin, Shoigu and further in the text - the enemy does not care, believe me. Special analysts sit there for this, besides, there are special people who feed these "brains" with information.

              So, until we have another Syria arranged, there is a hope that these analysts will be fed with the correct (from my point of view) information Yes

              Here is about my IMHA hi
              1. 0
                6 December 2015 10: 10
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                So, until we have another Syria arranged, there is a hope that these analysts will be fed with the correct (from my point of view) information


                - I agree with you.
          2. +3
            5 December 2015 23: 13
            Guys, you’re kind of nervous on Saturday. Can we sing? wink
            1. +1
              6 December 2015 00: 40
              Why be nervous, sing! fellow

    12. 0
      5 December 2015 23: 04
      Quote: ejov1976
      Thank you for the more humane bomb. We will try to respond with the same kindness.


      I think our "Kuzkin's mothers" can be several times more powerful and more numerous than those of the Americans. personally, I will not mind, knowing their mean nature
    13. 0
      5 December 2015 23: 40
      What for? Build ten - twenty "Mothers of Kuzma" and not make a big secret out of it! I think the "partners" will have enough to calm down.
    14. 0
      6 December 2015 00: 30
      Do not dig another pit ...
    15. 0
      6 December 2015 10: 12
      That's right. For good, good. It's Christian, Christian laughing
    16. 0
      6 December 2015 12: 21
      Flying Fortress will allow Russia to win a nuclear war
      This opinion is shared by foreign journalists who have analyzed the technical capabilities of the IL-80 air command center.
      22 38 18 47 Send Print Bookmark

      German journalists write that the Russian Federation can cope with any emergency. Moreover, they are confident that Russia can become the winner even in a nuclear war. The Focus edition writes that the Russian General Staff has an Il-80 "flying command center" at its disposal.

      This air command post was created on the basis of the wide-body IL-86 by order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. On this plane, the windows are located only in the cockpit, in addition, the designers have reduced the number of doors. All this will protect against a nuclear explosion. In addition, the IL-80 will allow you to strategically manage all types and arms.

      The design of the complex allows it to take on board the highest command personnel of the Russian Armed Forces, a combat crew consisting of an operational group of officers of the General Staff and specialists from a technical group. The Doomsday Plane is distinguished by increased functionality, reliability, improved weight and size characteristics, and lower energy consumption.
    17. 0
      6 December 2015 16: 41
      How can death be more humane, accurate, comfortable ???
      Truly, the words of one of the classics of mi-
      of the conspiracy thesis genre. What rules the world, Satan!
  2. +32
    5 December 2015 14: 11
    "... the ability to use a smaller charge that will reduce radioactive emissions ..."
    The first ever environmentally friendly nuclear bomb ?! Humanists, your maman ...
    1. +10
      5 December 2015 14: 22
      Humanists, your maman.
      -------------------------
      It's good that greenpeace doesn't work with us. We think bigger. "Status" rules!
      1. +12
        5 December 2015 14: 44
        Quote: guzik007
        Humanists, your maman.
        -------------------------
        It's good that greenpeace doesn't work with us. We think bigger. "Status" rules!

        Greenpeace rolled during the time of Hunchback and EBNogo. That's why they are Humpbacked and EBN. Although raped all of Russia.
        And all of Moscow is rotten. And now it has all of Russia. And Moscow, as you know, is not all of Russia.
        And how they love Muscovites in the regions!
        Enough already? Medvedev "prime ministers"? Serdyukov? Chubaytsev?
        Primakov. Here was the PRIME. But Medvedev must be unemployed. And let him try to survive.
    2. +4
      5 December 2015 14: 27
      Quote: ALABAY45
      "... the ability to use a smaller charge that will reduce radioactive emissions ..."

      Yes, the whole point is most likely that they have to make bombs of lower power because weapons-grade uranium needs to be obtained on centrifuges, of which they have few. Our weapons-grade uranium, which Yeltsin gave to the Americans, ruined their nuclear industry for the production of this uranium, so they have to tell them stories about low radioactive emissions. They simply do not have enough uranium for normal charges. Old bombs lose power over time, so they "upgrade" them in this way.
      1. +2
        5 December 2015 15: 57
        Speak new bombs ..? We do not understand languages, but the point we will controlthe word real moderation does not miss
  3. +16
    5 December 2015 14: 11
    According to General Cartwright, “the B61-12 bomb will have increased accuracy that will be achieved through the guided tail, and the ability to use a smaller charge, which will reduce radioactive emissions.”

    He noted that such characteristics "will be more convenient for the US President and decision-making on national security issues."

    And didn’t you think about what could fly back in response to you? Or do you think that America will fly from Europe to be out of business? You are mistaken, Mr. General, will fly to the mattress to the fullest.
    1. +5
      5 December 2015 14: 16
      Quote: Federal
      that you can fly back, did not think

      The Russian military-industrial complex is developing a trampoline of the latest system. smile
      1. +4
        5 December 2015 14: 37
        Quote: Vladimirets
        The Russian military-industrial complex is developing a trampoline of the latest system. smile

        What for what Yeralal, he said bluntly
        “Will be more comfortable for the US president and national security decision making».
        I think so, they’ll put it right under the toilet in the White House so that the next Obamik takes the right decisions on national security issues, otherwise he’s constantly underfunded the budget, you know what
      2. +2
        5 December 2015 15: 14
        Quote: Vladimirets
        The Russian military-industrial complex is developing a trampoline of the latest system.

        You can increase the production of boots. laughing
        In the Pacific Ocean, two submarines emerge - the American and ours.
        American team - dressed with a needle, all according to the charter; on our captain built a team and yells wildly at them, not embarrassed by the presence of foreigners:
        - Who threw a felt boot into the remote ?! I ask, who threw a felt boot into the console ??
        The captain of the American submarine looked at it, shook his head and said:
        - But here in America, the captain never yells at the team ...
        - Yes, there is no more of your America ... WHO TROUBLED THE VALENKO TO THE REMOTE?
  4. +15
    5 December 2015 14: 14
    Comfortable armchair. A comfortable car. But "convenience bombs" are simply brainwashing. Guys, let's better learn how to treat cancer. Or extract electricity from the air? No? Not interesting, because there won't be a pile of smoking corpses?
    1. 0
      5 December 2015 15: 30
      Quote: MuadDib
      Guys, let's learn how to treat cancer. Or extract electricity from the air?

      Well, cancer, in the early days it will be necessary to learn how to diagnose, but not how to treat, they know how to treat, but at the expense of electricity from the air, too, back in the last century

      They say autonomous weather stations, in the North, they were powered, I do not know, I did not check, but, only, the cost of this electricity is high.
      1. +5
        5 December 2015 16: 15
        The cancer treatment that is being used now is a lottery. Not everyone manages to save a life. And this treatment is not available to everyone.
        And when I talk about electricity from the air, I meant that energy would be available everywhere. I am sure that there are quite a few patents for inventions gathering dust on shelves that may never see the light of day. And it would be necessary to engage in the implementation of these innovations in our life to improve it, and not to rivet bombs and other means of destroying their own kind.
        1. 0
          5 December 2015 18: 55
          Here is this aggregate http://vpk.name/news/136119_v_serpuhove_pokazali_kompleks_kaskader_dobyivayushii
          _toplivo_iz_vozduha.html - it remains only to attach the generator to this machine.
          1. 0
            5 December 2015 22: 19
            Quote: Vadim237
            Here is this aggregate http://vpk.name/news/136119_v_serpuhove_pokazali_kompleks_kaskader_dobyivayushii



            _fuel_iz_vozduha.html

            This unit allows you to receive oxygen, nitrogen and air in a liquefied and gaseous form under pressure up to 400 atmospheres. And the generator is there. It takes a bunch of electricity to separate and compress the air, well, a bunch of diesel fuel, so that this generator gives the necessary energy recourse
            Do you even read what you post?
            1. 0
              6 December 2015 01: 44
              It allows you to get fuel from the atmosphere with minimal cost.
        2. 0
          5 December 2015 22: 07
          Quote: MuadDib
          I am sure that there are quite a few patents for inventions gathering dust on shelves that may never see the light of day.

          Yes, for God's sake, these inventions, and the Internet is full, like post-industrial technologies, everything is open, Nazgul, get out, read, so drop everything and go, product, make it right in the yard. Only, well, few people bother with them request
      2. +2
        5 December 2015 16: 48
        Quote: perepilka
        at the expense of electricity from the air

        Looked at your drawing what ... No. It's even somehow complicated ... You take it, you build an iron mast / tower higher and during a thunderstorm all atmospheric electricity is yours Yes . Verified recourse ...
        Hello, atmospheric electrician! drinks
        1. 0
          5 December 2015 19: 01
          You just need to put several dozens, or even hundreds of capacitors under this tower, of large capacity.
        2. +2
          5 December 2015 21: 04
          Quote: Angry Guerrilla
          You take, you build an iron mast / tower higher

          Hello gas scientist drinks .
          Megafonovskaya, standing next to me, I’ll go, I’ll substitute a bucket, maybe he’ll drip wassat
          1. +2
            5 December 2015 21: 24
            Quote: perepilka
            I will substitute a bucket

            Take an insulated handle. Well you know ...
            1. +1
              5 December 2015 21: 45
              Quote: Angry Guerrilla
              Well you know ...

              And then! I’ll put on gloves and shoe bots and a bed mat. Then I’ll check the absence of a thunderstorm and I will attach it to the PZ. You, this one, fight on mnu on Monday, so that I’m angrier what , exam, PTE and PTB recourse , the fourth in a row, and along the way, the last one, this year.
              1. +1
                5 December 2015 21: 55
                Quote: perepilka
                quarrel ... exam, on PTE and PTB

                Amen. sad
                1. +1
                  5 December 2015 22: 10
                  Quote: Angry Guerrilla
                  Amen. sad

                  Duc, it’s too early, I’ll live until Monday, every drinks
              2. +1
                6 December 2015 05: 20
                I forgot about the posters "Don't include the storm" ☺☺☺
      3. -1
        5 December 2015 18: 49
        Nobody has yet learned how to cure a malignant tumor, and as for energy from the air, our designers for the Ministry of Defense have already made such a machine.
    2. 0
      5 December 2015 18: 46
      This general is just one of those who do not cure "cancer", but produce it.
  5. +5
    5 December 2015 14: 14
    Issues of using nuclear weapons and linking environmental security problems to this issue ??? It really needs to be able to. Here any questions already disappear.
    1. +3
      5 December 2015 14: 49
      it is not for nothing that they want to be more "ecological". Then they want to master the territory. Ours.
      1. +1
        5 December 2015 15: 07
        Quote: denis 60 rus
        more "ecological" want. the territory then want to master. our.

        I thought about it too. The most environmentally friendly solution is to introduce your own people into the country's leadership, as for example in Ukraine. If this cannot be done in any way, then other options are considered, relatively "environmentally friendly". Germany was gouged thoroughly, then an additional "Marshal's plan" had to be introduced - the result was a full-fledged colony. Just how much extra money did you have to add? Now they are thinking about their add. expenses, damn merchants.
  6. +8
    5 December 2015 14: 14
    For some reason, I want one of these bombs to explode at the Europeans right at the base.
    1. +1
      5 December 2015 15: 37
      Quote: ejov1976
      For some reason, I want one of these bombs to explode at the Europeans right at the base.

      Yes, right under the belly of the aircraft which was equipped with these bombs angry
  7. +4
    5 December 2015 14: 14
    will be more convenient for the US president

    Just like in the movie "Independence Day". laughing
  8. +2
    5 December 2015 14: 16
    From these amerikosy only one fikaly! More of their initiative is not based on anything. And most importantly, if they had any sense at all, besides arrogance, it’s okay. But it turns out they are doing monkey work, they spend a lot of money for empty ideas.
  9. +5
    5 December 2015 14: 17
    By 2024, it is planned to make 480 bombs.

    However!? Ushlepok yusovsky possible year of the beginning of the next and probably the last in our history of the war designated ??
    1. 0
      5 December 2015 16: 14
      In 2024, these bombs will no longer be needed, since hypersonic missiles will appear.
  10. +11
    5 December 2015 14: 19
    Ours in general removed from service free-falling nuclear bombs. And Mattress toppers will keep them in Europe. As many as 480 pcs. Is this so that Europe will definitely get the first "splash"? By the same six storage bases. I hope that our warheads, which arrive in response "to the island", will not be distinguished by increased humanism. As well as reduced power.
  11. +2
    5 December 2015 14: 20
    The question is different, but will the plane reach the target?
  12. +24
    5 December 2015 14: 22
    An anecdote was composed in Soviet times, but how relevant!
    1. +12
      5 December 2015 15: 14
      As Yu. Nikulin said:
      1. +2
        5 December 2015 16: 39
        This story is about "Plato" .... hi
  13. +2
    5 December 2015 14: 24
    We will shoot down on take-off, so the accuracy of this bomb will be 100%.
  14. +2
    5 December 2015 14: 24
    “B-61 nuclear bombs are now deployed at six bases in five countries. The output of the first B61-12 bombs from the assembly line is planned for 2020, by 2024 it is planned to make 480 bombs. After that, some of them will be installed and deployed in Europe on new fifth-generation F-35A Lightning II fighter-bomber fighters and temporarily on older aircraft. ”


    There is time until 2020. You can make changes to the military doctrine from the destruction of carriers at airfields, or just take care of the Stalin (Putin) Strait ... what
  15. +4
    5 December 2015 14: 24
    This General needs to throw a nuclear grenade into his underpants to make it very convenient!
  16. +2
    5 December 2015 14: 25
    F-35? Nuclear weapon carrier? Are they going to use it against the Papuans?
  17. +6
    5 December 2015 14: 26
    They will never calm down. At the first opportunity to deliver an unpunished blow to us, I have no doubt they will inflict it. The sweet prospect of becoming the unconditional master of the world will always overpower the remnants of the mind.
  18. +4
    5 December 2015 14: 27
    And we are without any humanism, balls and no p-owls.
    1. +1
      5 December 2015 14: 39
      Probably you hope to survive yourself.
  19. +6
    5 December 2015 14: 30
    Europe is even a pity a little so tightly they all live there any shot down bomb will put an end to gamepads
  20. +5
    5 December 2015 14: 32
    The new B61-12 bombs, which are supposed to be placed in Europe, will be more accurate, and therefore more convenient for making decisions about their use, said the former commander of US strategic forces, James Cartwright.

    another tale for gullible idiots? to justify their aggressive actions?
    humanist fucking ...
    ... I remembered the notorious term "collateral losses", which was used to justify the numerous civilian casualties during the bombing of Yugoslavia ...
  21. +3
    5 December 2015 14: 34
    Yes, insanity grows stronger day by day! recourse
  22. +4
    5 December 2015 14: 37
    "Status-6" is now known to the whole world in Russia, a system of strategic deterrence is being born, against which no acceptable defense will be created even in the long term (simply due to the fact that the consequences of its use are of a global catastrophic nature) "
    I think that a serious argument for everyone.
    1. 0
      5 December 2015 18: 14
      Only in case of war, its application may not be expedient at all - while this torpedo swims to the enemy’s shore, all 1680 thermonuclear warheads will already do their job.
  23. +5
    5 December 2015 14: 37
    I read it and could not understand, in their country with the mentality of a cowboy, everyone is so miserable, and you are a general, try this bomb on your family and you will immediately see if it is accurate or how. And what difference does it blow you a meter away from you or a kilometer.
  24. +3
    5 December 2015 14: 38
    Nuclear bombs are attack weapons but not as defenses! This is another confirmation that the USA is the world AGGRESSOR. And no matter how the United States is dressed up in sheep's clothing, WOLF TAGS are more and more real.
  25. +2
    5 December 2015 14: 41
    He noted that such characteristics "will be more convenient for the US President and decision-making on national security issues."
    Better bomb shelter build more comfortable for your president
  26. +1
    5 December 2015 14: 57
    Well, what can I say, Europe itself will suffer from the deployment of nuclear weapons, and instead of security, there will be multiple dangers. The United States actually exposes the Europeans, because in the case of an attempt to use the probability of a nuclear explosion over European territory increases significantly, and given the terrorist danger, it is necessary to draw conclusions.
    Europe is not at all friends. But Russia needs to draw conclusions — it’s time to reduce the level of economic dependence on European integration — it’s dangerous to be friends with fools.
  27. +3
    5 December 2015 15: 01
    Well, who, if not the Americans, will instill in the Russian people a sense of "beauty"! Not a bomb, but a miracle of ergonomics, comfortable, beautiful, with a small emission of radiation. They think that the Russians have frozen in impatient anticipation of pleasure! And / d / and / o / t / s / American, everything should be fine in a person and not in a bomb! I am personally for our uncomfortable and terrible for enemies bombs and missiles, for the fact that our president would have the courage, reason and will to use them if necessary!
  28. 0
    5 December 2015 15: 05
    And what else can you expect from the descendants of bandits, crooks and adventurers? Such plans have been hatched almost since the advent of nuclear weapons. However, for now, be afraid to use because the gut is thin.
  29. +1
    5 December 2015 15: 07
    You might think that our bombs will give him a chance to escape.
  30. 0
    5 December 2015 15: 09
    Someone appointed nuclear war for 2018? The Yankees are going to receive "humane bombs" in 2020! Something, many benchmarks in a possible escalation of the war? Conclusion: either the US has completely gone crazy, or they will have to be "humanitarian" in place until 2018!
  31. +1
    5 December 2015 15: 14
    New bombs B61-12

    planes with these bombs will be shot down over those NATO countries from the airfields of which they took off.
  32. +2
    5 December 2015 15: 17
    In my opinion the most humane bomb
    this (from wiki) - "thermonuclear aviation bomb, developed in the USSR in 1954-1961 by a group of nuclear physicists under the leadership of Academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences I. V. Kurchatov. The most powerful explosive device in the history of mankind. The total energy of the explosion, according to various data, ranged from 57 to 58,6 megatons in TNT equivalent, or about 2,4 · 1017 J, which corresponds to a mass defect of 2,65 "

    Accuracy is certainly not enough, but I think it will do. Do not force Russia to spread such humanism. hi
    1. 0
      5 December 2015 18: 19
      We do not have such thermonuclear charges in service, due to their redundancy, high cost, delivery problems and complexity, cost - maintenance in storage.
      1. 0
        5 December 2015 20: 18
        We only have thermonuclear and there is - not to be confused with nuclear !! - which are withdrawn from service
  33. +1
    5 December 2015 15: 23
    and Canadians march with geopolitical intrigues.

    The new cabinet of Canada promises to legalize marijuana at the state level, reports the Associated Press.
  34. 0
    5 December 2015 15: 30
    Well, we are not looking for convenience, we will not pay attention to the inconvenience.
  35. +2
    5 December 2015 15: 30
    "Convenient nuclear bomb" ... Is there an inconvenient one? World has gone mad. In the minds of people there is only money, money and money again. By the way, it may turn out that in the near future this very money, on the acquisition of which we (people) today spend so much effort and energy, will lie under our feet, because they will not be needed by ANYONE. Why? Because people will be ... corny hungry - problems on the planet earth will be with food. And given the love of some paranoid personalities for "convenient nuclear bombs", which are planned to be placed practically at our side - in Europe, such an apocalyptic forecast does not seem so incredible.
  36. 0
    5 December 2015 15: 31
    I do not understand. Is this a platform for discussing urgent problems or a splash field for another statement by an American idiot? Guys, let's not pay attention to every bunch of patients in ward No. 6.
  37. 0
    5 December 2015 15: 39
    And first of all, I thought about how to shoot down carriers (F-35A and others) will we? It’s necessary to prepare a 100% answer, what the hell isn’t it?
  38. +1
    5 December 2015 15: 40
    Ha back in the sixties it was calculated how to start a wave before the cordillera, wash away all that is needed am my father then went on a long hike and they had at that time the task of blowing up rockets at the initiation point for the giant tsunami and quickly and did not pollute nature soldier drinks
    1. +1
      5 December 2015 16: 35
      Quote: AresReptilia
      Ha back in the sixties it was calculated how to start a wave before the cordillera, wash away all that is needed


      There cannot be such a tsunami. And 50 km inland will not be. Even if under water off the coast of the United States blow up hydrogen at 1000 megatons. Calculate at your leisure what mass of water you need to move with a front of 200 kilometers and a depth of 50 km. And what should be the speed and wave height near the shore? If at a distance of, say, 50 km from the Atlantic coast of the United States and at a depth of 1 km, a gigaton bomb is detonated. On the coast, the wave will come at what height? 500 m tall, as they said on TV? So then they planned only 100 megatons. In the early 60s. But hell with two, she will be of such height! When the volcano Krakatau exploded in 1883, an underwater explosion on a volcanic island, the energy release in the main explosion was 2 gigatons. But the tsunami waves did not exceed 30 m in height and the Indonesian coast captured inland no more than 4 km. And then only in certain places.
      1. 0
        5 December 2015 18: 26
        And add here the amount of instantly evaporated water and the vacuum effect of an 80 kilometer fireball in an explosion of 1000 megatons
  39. 0
    5 December 2015 15: 40
    Ha back in the sixties it was calculated how to start a wave before the cordillera, wash away all that is needed am my father then went on a long hike and they had at that time the task of blowing up rockets at the initiation point for the giant tsunami and quickly and did not pollute nature soldier drinks
  40. +1
    5 December 2015 15: 41
    Is this the type he scared the Russians ?! When I listen to American generals, my hands itch cleanly in Russian to smear their physiognomy.
  41. 0
    5 December 2015 16: 00
    In the meantime, there is no new bomb, no F-35 - give money for another PR project.
  42. +1
    5 December 2015 16: 06
    Inadequate Full-Definitely
    "It will have increased accuracy, which will be achieved through a controlled tail, and the ability to use a lower charge, which will reduce radioactive emissions."
    The eccentric cannot understand that he will hit the target or not, all the same, Rlossia will respond to a nuclear strike with "Kuz'kina's mother" or something more abruptly and more precisely. No one will seem to be weak.
  43. +4
    5 December 2015 16: 27
    Faster commissioning of our new developments. And experience in geyrop ...
  44. +1
    5 December 2015 16: 29
    I don’t understand the promise to whom they say it !?
    Us?
    What for?
    Cheap show-offs !!!
    I immediately remember a joke-draw a cross on Ivan’s chest with chalk, from the blow he will immediately die ..... Vasya, sprinkle this moron with chalk.
    Everything, even the general’s family, will die a few minutes later.
  45. 0
    5 December 2015 16: 36
    Quote: EvgNik
    Quote: kot28.ru
    and although America is a little sorry, Europe is ahead!

    Europe and the States need to be swapped.


    That's for sure...

    If the old lady Europe does not retreat insanity, then she will receive the first - "Russian souvenir".
  46. cap
    0
    5 December 2015 16: 43
    This is what they are going to carry on rust?
    “B-61 nuclear bombs are now deployed at six bases in five countries. The output of the first B61-12 bombs from the assembly line is planned for 2020, by 2024 it is planned to make 480 bombs. After that, some of them will be installed and deployed in Europe on new fifth-generation F-35A Lightning II fighter-bomber fighters and temporarily on older aircraft. ”
    We started to call "Iskander" - "Iskanderchik" tolerantly, and they "temporarily on older ones."
    Thank you for talking about six bases and five countries. Stirlitz is resting.
    Be sure to adjust who should be. soldier
  47. 0
    5 December 2015 16: 55
    ... airplanes, ships, tanks .... All this is good ...
    But the most important thing in all this is PEOPLE.
    Here, unlike the "liberals", we have not done everything yet.
    With God's help, of course.
  48. 0
    5 December 2015 16: 56
    I did not understand why a nuclear bomb needs filigree accuracy ??
    1. +2
      5 December 2015 17: 54
      Yes, it’s needed to destroy protected objects (missile silos, buried KPs, etc.) They need accuracy in meters, and a miss of 100 m leads to non-defeat of the target
  49. 0
    5 December 2015 16: 56
    You bring this exact bomb to the carrier until ours hit ...
  50. +1
    5 December 2015 17: 03
    Maybe I’m misunderstanding something, but what's the difference, well, an atomic bomb will fall 100 meters in the wrong direction? Anyway, for several kilometers in the radius will there be complete annihilation of all living and non-living?
    1. 0
      5 December 2015 19: 54
      I will try to explain American logic, as I understand it. Since the bomb is more accurate, the atomic charge is not needed, of great power (although what prevents me from using a simple, more accurate bomb for a point strike, I don’t understand either. After all, they came up with nuclear weapons to do maximum damage.) power is not big means the exclusion zone, too. I'm sorry this is not my nonsense.
    2. +2
      5 December 2015 20: 13
      Quote: blind
      I did not understand why a nuclear bomb needs filigree accuracy ??

      Quote: bashkort
      Maybe I’m misunderstanding something, but what's the difference, well, an atomic bomb will fall 100 meters in the wrong direction? Anyway, for several kilometers in the radius will there be complete annihilation of all living and non-living?


      The guided tail section will provide the B61 with an "optical missile detonator with the ability to complete a mission without entering the enemy's air defense zone" letting her to plan to your goalis a new feature that the B61 does not currently have.
      The B61-12 will use a spinning motor similar to that installed on B61-11, designed to improve stability during descent.
      http://maxpark.com/community/2042/content/2711709
      1. 0
        6 December 2015 14: 17
        this is for that - if they bomb Syria they will not get into Turkey belay
  51. +2
    5 December 2015 17: 41
    Quote: ejov1976
    Thank you for the more humane bomb. We will try to respond with the same kindness.

    Opponents hope to reduce radioactive contamination after use in order to further use the occupied territories after use, which means they really need our territories, but we don’t need their territories, therefore our bombs must be so radioactive that this vile tribe will never be reborn in the affected area again forever centuries.
    1. 0
      5 December 2015 18: 35
      We already have almost all thermonuclear warheads with a yield of 300, 500 and 750 kilotons, but this new bomb has a yield of only 80 kilotons, and in general these bombs will become morally obsolete in 2024, in view of the appearance of hypersonic cancer - all these statements are breaking through the contracts of interested companies , for the supply of weapons and financing.
  52. 0
    5 December 2015 18: 05
    The criminals received a new bomb.
  53. +1
    5 December 2015 18: 09
    You just need to send a couple of “satellites” into orbit - equivalent to “Kuzka’s Mother”. That's all the delivery.
  54. 0
    5 December 2015 18: 36
    Aha - cutting off the head with the least splashing of blood on the walls. Humanity! World has gone mad!!!!!!!
  55. 0
    5 December 2015 18: 56
    Hello, Europeans, thank Uncle Sam for your concern!!! fellow
  56. 0
    5 December 2015 18: 59
    They're surrounding us. Our guys are just defending. But we should probably hit them already. We've had enough of them.
  57. +1
    5 December 2015 19: 04
    Quote: Temples
    Or should you suggest that your "partners" use your brain?
    Indeed, for something the Lord gave them to him!
    Or did he deprive the servants of the devil?

    The brains of the “partners” were developed by the action of action films created in Hollywood and so realistic that they sincerely believed in these games; only real force can sober them up if anyone survives.
  58. 0
    5 December 2015 19: 19
    Quote: Temples
    It is necessary to answer the same.
    Deliver new bombs to our American friends.
    To Cuba. To Venezuela.
    By all means send a carriage of bombs to Syria.
    Kohl went such a booze!
    Kohl scored on non-proliferation!
    To walk, so to walk! To the full!
    With mushrooms for a snack!
    With nuclear! wassat

    Or should you suggest that your "partners" use your brain?
    Indeed, for something the Lord gave them to him!
    Or did he deprive the servants of the devil?
  59. +1
    5 December 2015 20: 03
    Well, since Obama marked the forehead of Merkel, Holland, Cameron, etc. , so be it. Do their people even know about this? Or is it just about this? (parody) -
  60. 0
    5 December 2015 20: 09
    and who was there??? who knows the truth???
  61. +1
    5 December 2015 20: 45
    The Americans are cowards - and their entire military nuclear doctrine is based on the fact that they will not receive an answer that is incompatible with their lives - such an answer can only be given - I repeat - only RUSSIA - they would have crushed the rest of the world long ago!!!!!!
  62. +3
    5 December 2015 21: 30
    The whole truth in one picture. I wonder if there are any normal people in the USA?
  63. 0
    5 December 2015 21: 32
    Whatever they say about a retaliatory strike, I believe that in a nuclear war the country that strikes first will have an overwhelming advantage. Therefore, we must not miss this moment when the time comes
    1. +1
      5 December 2015 21: 42
      Quote: Yak28
      Whatever they say about a retaliatory strike, I believe that in a nuclear war the country that strikes first will have an overwhelming advantage. Therefore, we must not miss this moment when the time comes

      In Siberia and the Urals they may not even notice that a nuclear war has begun... (in Chelyabinsk they definitely won’t notice))))
  64. 0
    5 December 2015 21: 39
    How could they turn off the electricity throughout the country for 10-20 days? Do you think this is even possible?
  65. 0
    5 December 2015 21: 42
    Leopard change his spots. The USA is dragging itself there...
  66. 0
    5 December 2015 21: 47
    I wish mattress covers to try a convenient bomb in their states)))) lovers of PEACE and democracy am
  67. 0
    5 December 2015 21: 50
    more and better humane Iskanders
  68. 0
    5 December 2015 21: 58
    Here is a man standing in front of you, and in his hands he has a boar hammer, and you take an awl out of your pocket???
  69. 0
    5 December 2015 21: 59
    Quote: Алексей_К
    Quote: Dmitry_24rus
    mvg - THANKS! The level of "comments" is off scale, you + are big. SUGGESTING ALL CANCEL RACE FUCK. And publish comments with a nickname. And that's all.
    Alexander Romanov and other important persons - your reaction ????

    Exactly, the dullness of the cheers-marshals just rolls over. It's time to cancel all these epaulettes.


    Come on. Let the goonies have their fun. They should be allowed to increase their ratings on their own. I put as much as I wanted. It'll be funny. Well, organize bets. I already have two favorites. Always in the forefront. And when do they have time?
  70. 0
    5 December 2015 22: 08
    The states will have no future....
  71. 0
    5 December 2015 22: 21
    Look at the article by Hans M. Christensen on the Rodina-USSR website: Nuclear bomb B61-12 - New photographs display new combat capabilities dated May 1, 2014. There is about this bomb with photos and diagrams. Interesting.
  72. +1
    5 December 2015 22: 23
    in geopolitical disputes they somehow completely forgot about scientific achievements
    Check out these stunningly detailed photos of Pluto from 17 km away
    http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/nh-craters-mountains-gl
    aciers.jpg
    article here https://tvrain.ru/news/pluto_max-399575/

    Previously, this was unattainable.
  73. +1
    5 December 2015 22: 32
    Who knows whether we are producing nuclear charges or whether there are only remnants from Soviet arsenals?
    1. 0
      6 December 2015 00: 32
      And who will tell you! smile Everyone in the know is subscribed. Hard workers, perhaps, don’t even really know what rheostats and ammeters they turn... But they guess.
      I myself once set up CNC machines, who knows why the titanium alloy parts were sharpened, but everyone knew that there was a higher workshop and concrete rocket parts were being produced in the next one. Everyone is in white coats, try to smoke in the workshop - prison. Everything is surrounded by thorns and towers with machine gunners. ROMANCE..
      But no, no, we produced cultivators, vacuum cleaners and cassette players... winked
      Eh..if it were possible to make an amplifier from those forbidden components, or Mayak 223, Nokamichi would be resting...
      1. 0
        6 December 2015 02: 25
        Yes, I found information several years ago that the production of charges remained only in the USA and China. I still haven’t found anything particularly reliable - it’s just fiction and guesswork.
        1. 0
          6 December 2015 02: 34
          Quote: Forest
          I found information several years ago that the production of charges remained only

          Not here, by any chance?

          http://www.contrtv.ru/common/2894

          So there it is, for example, it is written:

          Quote: http://www.contrtv.ru/common/2894
          In Russia, even the technology for manufacturing tank gun barrels has been lost; after the first few shots, the flight of the next shells on our new tank is hardly predictable. The reasons are the same - the specialists have grown old or dispersed from non-working production facilities, and the equipment is either dilapidated, or stolen, or sold for scrap. It is likely that much more complex technologies for obtaining weapons-grade plutonium and creating nuclear charges from it have long been lost, and it will take not a year or two to restore them, but at best 10 years

          In general, the article is very old, it also says that Russian nuclear charges “went rotten” somewhere in the late 90s..

          IMHO, something has changed in this area since then, and significantly.
          1. 0
            6 December 2015 12: 56
            Not her, but I read a similar one about Ukraine. which was written back in the early 2000s. Along the way, people simply rolled over the names/dates.
    2. 0
      6 December 2015 18: 24
      We can say with confidence what they are doing - fourth generation thermonuclear charges.
  74. 0
    5 December 2015 23: 03
    You want us with bombs...well, well!!!
    When you burn in Hellfire, please remember military unit 34048.
    Say thank you to Putin for being so kind!!!
    As Khrushchev said - “We will bury you”
  75. +1
    5 December 2015 23: 38
    The new B61-12 bombs, which are expected to be deployed in Europe, will be more accurate and therefore easier to decide on their use
    Russia, as a result of modernizing its nuclear weapons, has achieved other, more impressive results - NOBODY AFTER US!, this means that if we use this ammunition, then everyone else who has such ammunition may not use it, there will be enough for EVERYONE!!! Even if we miss, it will first blow away, and then it will wash or wash away, and no one will care. Hence the conclusion, if you decide to use this new bomb, then it’s better for you to jump with it, it will be more humane. Yes, the number of places is limited... fellow
    1. 0
      6 December 2015 08: 55
      Quote: Papapg
      NOBODY AFTER US!

      It’s more convenient for them to deliver 10 Kt by air at an altitude of 50 km - then it’s more convenient for us to deliver 1 Mt under water at a depth of 150 km.
  76. 0
    6 December 2015 00: 04
    Humanists however)
  77. +1
    6 December 2015 00: 15
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Tim Coconuts
    Our good will be kinder!

    In the meantime ...
    On November 18, the first successful launch of an interceptor missile missile defense system NIR "Nudol" took place. After two unsuccessful attempts. The first successful interception in space by a P-222 rocket (product 14Ts033) .
    Here is the news. soldier And the fact that this mattress general squeezed it out is interesting for grandmothers with seeds at the entrance.


    How's that? The launcher has already become a rocket???
  78. 0
    6 December 2015 06: 15
    Quote: Temples
    It is necessary to answer the same.
    Deliver new bombs to our American friends.
    To Cuba. To Venezuela.
    By all means send a carriage of bombs to Syria.

    It’s better to go straight to Washington.. Plan the land a little....
  79. +1
    6 December 2015 07: 08
    So it seems to me (I want) that in the threatened period
    ours will quietly plant (activate) thermonuclear land mines
    at certain points on the seabed and at the most critical moment...
    Because a nuclear explosion is a nuclear explosion.
    There is no such thing as a toy nuclear explosion, and we will respond harshly.
  80. 0
    6 December 2015 14: 13
    I wonder if you turn off their satellites, will they be able to do anything at all?
    1. 0
      6 December 2015 17: 57
      All you have to do is turn off the Internet and everything will die.
  81. 0
    6 December 2015 16: 09
    The first one will fly on your stupid head!
  82. 0
    7 December 2015 00: 58
    Quote: ejov1976
    Thank you for the more humane bomb. We will try to respond with the same kindness.

    We are not humanists. For us to lower the charge is not to respect ourselves. But accuracy is the politeness of kings :)
  83. 0
    7 December 2015 08: 32
    Everything America does is intended against Russia.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"