Return of sovereignty: the Constitutional Court has the right to recognize the decisions of the ECHR as impracticable

Behind the ups and downs associated with Syria, Turkey, and the terrorists of the Jemilev Mejlis, an event has remained somewhat in the shadow, the importance of which in terms of strengthening Russian sovereignty is difficult to overestimate. We are talking about the adoption by deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation in the second and third readings of the draft law, according to which the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has the right to declare decisions of the European Court of Human Rights impracticable if such decisions contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation. It would seem that the adopted bill is of a purely technical nature and is not capable of bringing about fundamental changes at the defense platform of the Constitution and the sovereignty of the Russian Federation. However, by and large, this is a real legislative revolution. In fact, Russia has finally gathered strength and made the first (but very important) step towards demonstrating that Russian legislation is of paramount importance for the state and the population, in contrast to the so-called “international” legislation.

The idea of ​​the need to put the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation above the same ECHR was not born last week. In fact, it has been in the air for years, especially considering the fact that European judicial institutions for all the time Russia fulfilled its obligations as part of them very (well, very highly) rarely decided to make any decisions in Russian favor.

In July of this year, the judge of the Constitutional Court of Russia Sergey Mavrin announced the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation that the decisions of the Strasbourg court should be executed by Russia only if they do not go against the Russian Constitution.

From the comment of the judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation:

Russia's participation in an international treaty (an agreement on the execution of decisions of the Strasbourg Court) does not mean a rejection of state sovereignty.

From the July ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation:

The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the legal positions of the ECHR based on it cannot cancel the priority of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. (...) The Human Rights Convention is an integral part of the legal system of the Russian Federation, while Russia can retreat from the obligations imposed on it, when such a derogation is the only way to avoid violation of the Basic Law. (...) The national authorities should resolve the issue of applying national legislation.

And this initiative of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation was decided by the deputies of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation to implement at the legislative level. The initiators of the consideration of the relevant draft law were Vladimir Pligin, a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, chairman of the committee on constitutional legislation and state construction, and Senator, Andrei Klishas, ​​authorized representative of the Federation Council in the RF IC and Prosecutor General’s Office.

From the explanatory note to the bill adopted by the State Duma of the Russian Federation in the second and third readings, and amending the constitutional law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation:

At the request of the federal executive body vested with the competence to protect the interests of the Russian Federation when the intergovernmental body for the protection of human rights and freedoms is examined, complaints filed against the Russian Federation on the basis of an international treaty, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation resolves the possibility of enforcing the decision of the intergovernmental body for the protection of rights and freedoms person

Further, it is reported that if the decision of the ECHR is recognized by the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to be inconsistent with the Russian Constitution, such a decision by Russia will simply not be executed.

Even before the discussion of the draft law on amending the law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the deputies discussed the issue related to the fact that the decisions of the Strasbourg court, to put it mildly, are often aimed at “diluting” Russian sovereignty. To understand how the ECHR is concerned about the “human rights situation in Russia”, it is enough to cite interesting statistics. For a number of years, Russia has been ranked first in the number of complaints filed with the ECHR, as well as in the first place in the number of satisfied claims against Russia. The largest number of lawsuits against the Russian Federation was noted in 2010 year - 14309 (this is almost 40 lawsuits per day!) On average, over the past ten years, the number of lawsuits filed against Russia is about 10,5 thousand per year. At the same time, the ECtHR accepts claims against Russia not only in civil but also in criminal cases. Arbitration decisions rendered in Russia, the European Court of Human Rights also proposes to reconsider if suddenly the Russian decision is not satisfied with someone. And if the “political” component is suddenly found out in the claimant, then for the ECHR this is a tidbit at all, which will be licked and sucked from all sides to exaggerate the process, giving it almost a global scale.

At the same time, the decisions of the ECHR were made in such a way, as if Russia had no Basic Law at all, that is, the Constitution. European judges, among whom a Russian representative was invited more for pro forma, acted according to the principle: the Constitution of the Russian Federation? No, we do not know ...

Here is just one example of the ruling of the Strasbourg Court.

The “V.Gusinsky v. Russia” process.

In June 2000, Mr. Gusinsky was arrested on suspicion of fraud. The investigation gathered a lot of evidence that, while creating various commercial projects, Gusinsky, through fraud, transferred broadcasting functions from the state-owned Russian Video company to the private company Russian Video. As a result of this transaction, the state-owned company lost an 11 TV channel with an estimated cost of $ 10 million. After that, Gusinsky left Russia and moved to Spain, where he was first arrested by local police and then released with a refusal from Russia to request extradition.

In 2004, the ECHR, in which Mr. Gusinsky (now, by the way, the owner of News.ru), who previously represented TC NTV (under the direction of Mr. Gusinsky, the television channel, as you know, widely covered the Chechen campaign, and on the side of the militants, showing exclusively "atrocities of the feds"), rendered the following verdict:

a) the defendant in the person of the Russian state has to pay 88 thousand euros over three months in compensation for costs and expenses, which must be converted into the national currency of the respondent state at the exchange rate on the day of the decision (plus the amount of all taxes that can be deducted when currency conversion).

b) after the aforementioned three months before the final payment, interest will be charged in excess of the amount at a rate equal to the ECB's usual credit rate for the specified period, plus 3%.

That is, the ECtHR sided with Mr., against whom Russian investigative bodies collected numerous volumes of evidence on charges of fraud and misappropriation of state property. But do the proofs of the Russian investigation have any significance for the Strasbourg judges, for whom the protection of human rights is far from the first place.

Russia was forced to pay compensation to a person suspected of fraud against Russia! This is five points, of course ...

No, of course, there were cases when the ECHR took the side of what is called the working people - when ordinary citizens lost due to the fault of the bureaucracy from the bureaucracy of the shelter or were forced to make ends meet in connection with the bank frauds whose victims were. The Russian justice, frankly, far from always stands on the side of such plaintiffs, and therefore they are forced to seek the truth even in the same ECHR. But the rulings of the ECHR in favor of such plaintiffs are unlikely to somehow contradict the Russian Constitution. The thing is different. - The fact that through the ECHR they often try to push through the cases of outright fraudsters, accomplices of terrorists, adherents of all sorts of sectarian trends, trying to pretend to be “victims of the regime”. And such “victims” in Strasbourg are strangely supported.

And now the Constitutional Court will have every reason to be able, as they say, to separate the wheat from the chaff and to make its verdict regarding the ruling of the ECHR. It is assumed howl of Russian “human rights activists” feeding on foreign grants ... Well, nothing ... They will calm and calm down, all the more so it is necessary to recall that constitutional institutions have a higher status than the ECHR status in a number of European countries, including, for example, Germany and Britain. So Russia is just learning to adopt the advanced European experience ...

Comments

[avvg]

The process has begun! I have a negative attitude to Gorbachev, but the words are appropriate.

[KOH]

Finally, slowly, but the noose around the neck of Russia, draped over by the Gorboeltsin period, crackled ... I’m very glad to hear such a news ...

[Dembel77]

The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is granted the right to declare unenforceable decisions of the European Court of Human Rights if such decisions contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation

Finally. Thank God - wait! And I want to believe that the adoption of this amendment to the law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, important for Russian statehood, is only the first sign in a series of other important laws that should serve to strengthen the true sovereignty of our state. It is a pity that some laws are not retroactive. How many crooks like Gusinsky could be brought to justice.

[_Vladislav_]

Quote: Dembel 77

Finally. Thank God - wait! And I want to believe that the adoption of this amendment to the law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, important for Russian statehood, is only the first sign in a series of other important laws that should serve to strengthen the true sovereignty of our state.

What is the ECHR? This is an international institution that is a legislator of international law.
What is happening with international law today? It is all sorts of broken. So one asks why such a right should prevail in Russian.

In our country, laws are violated much less frequently than Americans step over international law.

[your1970]

"What is the ECHR - an international institution that is the legislator of international law."

ECHR IS NOT THE LEGISLATOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW !!!!
We have signed an agreement on the execution of judgments of the ECHR and, according to it, we undertake to execute court decisions.
No in the world lawmakers basically.
There is a priority of an international treaty (it was the same in the Constitution of the USSR) after which it is ratified (validated), and at the same time (or rather, before it is signed), it is checked for compliance with the Constitution and national legislation.

The decisions of the ECHR are binding on us because we are members of the Council of Europe and upon entering agreed to abide by its decisions. But these decisions are not international law.
To make it clear, the decision of our district court is strictly necessary for execution by all: state bodies, legal entities, citizens, etc. But at the same time it has no legislative power and does not create a precedent. They can be appealed, etc.
So with the ECHR, their decisions, since we adopted their rules of the game, are binding in each case, but are not binding in other cases (they do not have the force of law).
Having exited these agreements, we lose the right to appeal to international courts ... Therefore, in the case of the Mistral, for example, we would lose the right to sue.
Another question is how effectively we use this right ...

[jjj]

Speaking of the Central Bank of Russia. Now he will have to share with the Russian State 90 the percentage of his profits. This innovation was also quiet and not unnoticed. But this is a step towards financial sovereignty.

[larand]

Quote: jjj

Speaking of the Central Bank of Russia. Now he will have to share with the Russian State 90 the percentage of his profits. This innovation was also quiet and not unnoticed. But this is a step towards financial sovereignty.

But this is only in 2016 at the end of 2015 (previously planned 75%). And the cunning Nabeulins immediately reduced the profit of 2015 from 56 to 22 billion rubles.

[Derex]

I don’t quite agree with you, the Central Bank’s goals are not in making profit, but: 1) maintaining and developing the financial system of the Russian Federation 2) and so on. listing is not their hunt there. 5 .2015 was for the Central Bank that period. So the decline in their income is understandable

[asiat_61]

Is it the task of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation to make a profit? Or are the functions somewhat different?

[3axap82]

Is that why he should share? How do you imagine that? Who will oblige him?

[WAP Master]

I will add ...
International law is who is stronger and is right. He who is stronger will write a law not only for his country, but also for others.
Our country is getting stronger. I’m sure that for other countries we won’t write laws, but soon we will be able to hint what exactly (to them at home) we need to write.

[Vohman]

I read a few comments above, further reading is even scary ..
... Non-recognition of international law - after all, everything seems to be going to that and everyone here takes these governmental decisions with a bang, the president’s decisions are not to be considered and generally for Russia this international law is absolutely unnecessary ..

My question is - I'm sorry - are you stupid people ?!

And now the answer: Here Mr. President the other day explains to everyone that international law = this is dog crap, the Russian people do not need ...
Now we recall the debt of Ukraine in 3 billion dollars. And now, when ANYONE does not need international courts, and this is bullshit, HE instructed Finance Minister Anton Siluanov to sue Ukraine in connection with the non-repayment of a $ 3 billion loan.
And let me ask you which court? In one of the Moscow ones? Or where? Is there something I probably do not understand, or is the president - excuse me - something not quite consistent? Or is it for ordinary people - i.e. such a b.y.dl.a - "the most humane" Russian court will be the only instance, and for some of the crowned ones - an international one is also needed?
Here explain to me, a fool - in what court will they file against Ukraine? Or doesn’t the president understand that only in international courts ?! Or type of people holding an uneducated herd?

Something starts to smell all this badly ... or they just lie to us, sweet so, noodles on our ears. well, cheers - soon only to bow to the king-priest. there will be no other ships.

[S_last]

And why are you so excited? When joining the Council of Europe, the recognition of the ECHR is one of the conditions. Russia will come out of the Council of Europe and immediately the ECHR (European Court of Human Rights) will be up to us.

[bastard]

Quote: Dembel 77

It is a pity that some laws are not retroactive. How many crooks like Gusinsky could be brought to justice.

[_GSVG_]

You can add - cancel indicate nationality.

[Idiot]

Especially Article 75.2 bothers me.

[Idiot]

Especially Article 75.2 bothers me.

[Enot-poloskun]

The decision is very important!

For example, the Balts are in transit with their ideas about compensation for "oppression during the Soviet era."

In the span homosexuals.

And finally, the soaring 50 billion dollars fly by so-called the Yukos case.

All the nonsense are in line to receive ears from a dead donkey.

[cniza]

Quote: Enot-poloskun

The decision is very important!

For example, the Balts are in transit with their ideas about compensation for "oppression during the Soviet era."

In the span homosexuals.

And finally, the soaring 50 billion dollars fly by so-called the Yukos case.

All the nonsense are in line to receive ears from a dead donkey.

Not everything is so simple, but a step in the right direction, I really want to believe that we will not turn off this path.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Enot-poloskun

For example, the Balts are in transit with their ideas about compensation for "oppression during the Soviet era."

In the span homosexuals.

And finally, the soaring 50 billion dollars fly by so-called the Yukos case.

There are two ways - either to hammer on this court and then, due to the uselessness of throwing, all these nonsense themselves will fall off like warts. Or orient our best hooking forces to the fight - counterclaims, casuistry, etc.

Ode paths are good, but the second path will last for decades. Of course, it is possible, but all this bunch of crochet hooks will need to be fed all these decades - once, and the second - making excuses, we de facto recognize the claims.

And therefore - even visibility does not need to be created, that we somehow somehow, through the COP, consider something inappropriate there. To declare directly and loudly - we do not consider your court to be impartial, but consider it politicized and biased. Therefore, you can make any decisions - but on the drum!

And they rock the boat to arrest property abroad - so let them try. We, in Russia, have accumulated so much foreign property thanks to "freedom and democracy" that we will still see who is arresting whom ...

[your1970]

"There are two ways - either Score to this trial, and then, in view of the futility of throwing, all these litigants themselves will fall off like warts. "
Score you can nail into the fence - here the situation is a little different .
In order not to comply with the decisions of the ECHR, we must withdraw from the judicial system of Europe and the world. What will be the consequences? Deprivation of the opportunity to assert our rights in court.
Consequences: Mistral - as soon as the conversation about the court arose, Hollande ran to the airport with a quick gallop, and then sold them to Egypt. The question of backfill - where will Egypt get the helicopters - besides us and at OUR price? Or did the 404 country blather that it would go to court with a lawsuit and surplus? gone? no! - a counterclaim of Gazprom arose in arbitration.
and there are many such cases ...
Come out, let's say, and what to do? To fight every time how does someone owe us?
How else to work?
And what about the overall image of the country?
Do you want the same as 404 country now?
I am still inclined towards the second option: "to orient our best hook-making forces to the struggle - counterclaims, casuistry, etc."

And finally, about the Constitution of the Russian Federation, written under the dictation of the United States
The Constitution of the USSR 1977 (I hope everyone will agree that it was definitely not dictated by the US ???)
"Article 29 ... ......; fulfillment in good faith of the obligations arising from from generally recognized principles and norms of international law, from international treaties concluded by the USSR.

[sharp-lad]

When politics judges, law disappears!

[jktu66]

For example, in the span of the Baltic states

What? And our "brothers" in vain check $ 300 billion for the "Holodomor" ???

[go21zd45few]

It’s time to change the constitution dictated by the United States and remove the Central Bank of Russia from the control of the US Federal Reserve and the IMF.

[Dart2027]

We will live to see this.

[3axap82]

And all our oligarchs including the president will be left without their foreign assets and accounts. This is unlikely to happen. Well, maybe there are heroes like that.

[Dart2027]

Quote: 3axap82

oligarchs including president

Does he have them?

[Derex]

I doubt that the GDP. It is painful for many oligarchs to withdraw their assets from abroad and invest in the Russian Federation. It feels like they stupidly explained: either you are for us or against.

[Bayun]

I agree. Oh, and WORK ... Get rid of someone else's system of power ("democracy"), someone else's laws and someone else's money. Directly, some kind of battle of Ivan Tsarevich (or "peasant son", as you like) with a 3-headed serpent is happening;) But, the course of history is happy!

[3axap82]

For ordinary people in Russia, this was the only non-salable court where any citizen could turn. If the Russian court did not help. He did not put on any strangleholds. It would be better if they stopped keeping money in in. our officials. And the fact that some oligarchs pay compensation to other oligarchs about the court decision, I personally do not care. The loud word "state" in the person of the ECHR defendant is just a group of Russian tsar-oligarchs.

[Mitek]

It is high time. In the ass their laws! Still used mortal return and confiscation of bureaucrats and their relatives ... Oh, dreams, dreams))

[Junior, I]

Sometimes thoughts are material, life will show.
That's when the government is re-elected, then their heads will fly. No one will write a law against himself.

[mihasik]

Quote: Younger, I

That's when the government is re-elected, then their heads will fly. No one will write a law against himself.

When will they be re-elected? When will "Ours not surrender" end?)

[asiat_61]

The government appoints the Guarantor, and the deputies "..APPROVE .."

[H_l_o_p_e_C]

The main thing is to start, and there .....

[Vend]

Quote: avvg

The process has begun! I have a negative attitude to Gorbachev, but the words are appropriate.

Russia is an independent country. Mattress justice in the furnace.

[yuri p]

went, but for how long, would there still be a law on CB and the Constitution of the Russian Federation change.

[Andrea]

Actions are taken for granted. Here it is necessary either to change the constitution, which is nonsense, or to implement the constitution, because it is the main law.

[beer-youk]

Why change? There is an American amendment practice.

[subbtin.725]

Well, finally, it happened, the talker-deputies gave birth to a landmark decision. The alleged 50-yard lards of the green so-called shareholders of the ill-fated Yukos cried.

[DIMA45R]

How many years have you tried to push, and now the composition has started and is gaining speed and you’ll stop the hell ... For all, this direction has long been obvious and the legislative statement is the last link.

[Rurikovich]

It is high time!! At one time, a bunch of advisers of clearly non-Slavic origin around the drunken President on the wave of gaining freedom from the "regime" were pushing through laws that were by no means aimed at strengthening Russia. Now the time has come to become independent in their decisions without looking at the West, which is trying with all its might to destroy us.
Personally, my opinion

[BARKHAN]

This is because a fried bird with a sharp beak is attached to the back with the aim of a pinpoint hit in the top ten ...
As it turned out, now any ruler can easily be dragged out of the palace and torn (hanged).
That is why they do not touch Serdyukov, Chubais ... So that there is no precedent ...
Then there will be no untouchables, and hundreds of thieves can be driven to Kolyma.
But the situation in the world has changed so much ... Now there is almost no quiet, secluded corner left on the planet where you can hide everything "overwhelmingly acquired". And quietly in old age, lie under a palm tree and warm your belly.
The era of a new shake-up of all good has come. And again it is important to "plunder the loot." Remember the stories with accounts in Cyprus, Switzerland ... and this is only the beginning.

[obstructia]

Yes, nevermind myself) Finally I got it.

[Filxnumx]

Finally, Russia responded to the removal of the brain in a clear and understandable way: they all went to ... I hope that amateurs from the Russian Federation profit from their zeal will decrease.

[Bassoon]

It's time.

[parusnik]

Finally .. I represent the collective howl of grant-eaters ...

[Serhio]

Well, well, they get grants for howling.

[sa-ag]

It's a strange thing, the Constitution is the Basic Law, and takes precedence over all national laws and other normative acts, so if it were changed, it would indeed be "... this is a real legislative revolution."

[afdjhbn67]

Quote: sa-ag

Strange affair,

I laugh and sad from your childhood joy .. In fact, they banned the only court that gave hope to find the truth to a simple citizen, when all Russian courts refused - therefore, Vasya Pupkin, if he loses a court in the country, he can smoke bamboo - it works against us ordinary citizens, and not Against the authorities, as always, sit and rejoice ....
PS, the State very much and much lost in the ECHR - all the same, they managed to push this decision over to them .. and once again I will repeat any independence and there was nothing to stand next to ..

[sa-ag]

Quote: afdjhbn67

I laugh and sad with your childhood joy.

What a joy there, I am mildly surprised at people who pay money so that they know the laws

[afdjhbn67]

Quote: sa-ag

What joy there

Yes, I just pushed off your comment - the only one with a spark of reason for a moment .. For the delight that another right was taken away from people was incredible

[atalef]

Quote: afdjhbn67

Quote: sa-ag

Strange affair,

I laugh and sad from your childhood joy .. In fact, they banned the only court that gave hope to find the truth to a simple citizen, when all Russian courts refused - therefore, Vasya Pupkin, if he loses a court in the country, he can smoke bamboo - it works against us ordinary citizens, and not Against the authorities, as always, sit and rejoice ....
PS, the State very much and much lost in the ECHR - all the same, they managed to push this decision over to them .. and once again I will repeat any independence and there was nothing to stand next to ..

Good morning. Nicolae.
You are absolutely right - this is not the return of sovereignty.
This closed another door. when a person could simply complain about the arbitrariness of the authorities and get at least some kind of legal assessment and compensation.
look what is happening.
At first, Rosneft (the Cree state 0 grieved Yukos 9 despite the fact that some of the shareholders were ordinary depositors who had nothing to do with either Khodorkovsky or the oligarchy 0 - but reveling in their impunity and permissiveness. And did not give them the opportunity to return their money.
Participating in a court of law (arbitration 0 and a priori confirming its legitimacy with its participation - when a case is lost) declared it was not legitimate and incompetent.
it reminded me a bit of a card game. when when losing - suddenly someone said. that the roller debt is bullshit and he is not obliged to pay at all.
Now the same thing happened with the ECHR.
weird. what no one. except Russia, the same thought did not appear - that this violates and infringes on the sovereignty of the country.
only in Russia - where the government wants to feel complete permissiveness - did this happen.
well. what can i say? Slaves applaud the new collar.
Bravo.

[afdjhbn67]

Quote: atalef

well. what can be said

Hello Alexander Which, unfortunately, has to be observed ..

[figter]

For a number of years, Russia ranks first in the number of complaints filed with the ECHR.and also the first place in the number of satisfied claims against Russia. The largest number of lawsuits against the Russian Federation was noted in 2010 year - 14309 (this is almost 40 lawsuits per day!) On average, over the past ten years, the number of lawsuits filed against Russia is about 10,5 thousand per year.

These figures only indicate that there is no proper justice in the country. An appeal to the ECHR was the last hope of many "mere mortals" to achieve at least some justice. The outrages committed in our courts are beyond any scope, and that is why there are so many appeals to the European Court. And nothing to do with the "fifth columns", "liberals", "gayropes", etc. these people, deceived by their state, in whose name are often simply shameful decisions, did not. If the decisions of the domestic courts were justified, lawful and fair - no one would apply to the ECHR, they would simply not be accepted into their proceedings and considered there. And now it turns out that because of a handful of detainees who have sued the "wealth" three times plundered from each other, ordinary people have lost their last aid.

The Russian justice, frankly, far from always stands on the side of such plaintiffs, and therefore they are forced to seek the truth even in the same ECHR. But the rulings of the ECHR in favor of such plaintiffs are unlikely to somehow contradict the Russian Constitution.

Not a single Russian judge now even dares to go against the stream and make a decision in accordance with the decision of the ECHR, even if it is three times lawful and fair - he will simply fly out from this place which he occupies. And the place is very, very bread in our time and no one will risk it!

[33 Watcher]

And what do you think of the priority of American law over any other? AND?
Although you can, do not work, and so I know, this is another matter! This is freedom! And you, you ... You are slaves, and you have a dictatorship !!! In! And all of you must be soaked, and Siberia is the property of all mankind! So..?

[provincial]

parusnik (2) SU Today, 07:09 New

Finally .. I imagine the collective howl of grant-eaters ... It has begun.

[padded jacket]

Quote: atalef

Initially, Rosneft (the Cree state 0 fussed Yukos

It is not for nothing that atalef is so worried about YUKOS, since its main shareholders are Israeli citizens and it is they who should receive about $ 50 billion of "compensation" from Russia.
For a long time it was necessary to "destroy" this yoke with the help of which the US, EU, Israel strangled and plundered our country.

[3axap82]

Yes, even so. Did they SELL stocks? Or did they get them by theft and robbery? Probably sold.
The yoke "which was strangled" is our government with the president. Who have children abroad and money is also abroad. Because in Russia they do not produce even a third of the goods of the material world to which these officials strive. Luxury medicine in Switzerland, spa houses and castles, Bentleys, Ferraris, private jets, whose catalogs with prostitutes you consider to be movie stars.

[padded jacket]

Quote: 3axap82

Or they got them by theft and robbery

Without any doubt, they formed their Yukos from the former property of the USSR by stealing and being close to Yeltsin and his company of privatizers like Chubais.

[33 Watcher]

The state cannot violate the rights of Vasya Pupkin, only a separate official can. This time. And two, all of these characters like you most of all care for the rights that they will never use when they never. I wonder why?
Although not important. Have decided and GLORY TO GOD!

[Born in USSR]

They wrote us the Constitution in the USA. Che wonder then. It is necessary to change it for a long time. There are many things that are unnecessary for us. And the most interesting is that we should be sick for all of humanity. And ESPECIALLY FOR ITS PROGRESSIVE EXCLUSIVE PART.tan and geyropu.

[Shark Lover]

Another question would have been raised, secured about top-level officials. A ban on permanent residence abroad. As so, he was president and then dumped to live abroad. He was a deputy, dumped abroad, was the daughter of a chmyr, dumped abroad. By the way, that the ice has broken it says one more thing. There was info shuvalov bought an apartment in London, something half a billion rubles. Maybe also preparing for permanent residence?

[sa-ag]

Quote: Shark Lover

There was info shuvalov bought an apartment in London, something half a billion rubles. Maybe also preparing for permanent residence?

To have an apartment in Londongrad is an indicator of status at the present time, again, the sport of gentlemen is "running with the cash register" :-)

[uge.garik]

... Proceeding from the fact that - "everything that is not prohibited is possible", is it not high time to introduce into international law - "Human Responsibilities" ...

[horoh]

Hrenase, this is news, now only forward !!!

[afrikanez]

If the Constitution were a little corrected and everything would be wonderful, well, you can still appoint a penalty for serious crimes.

[Saratoga833]

Quote: afrikanez

Still a little amend the Constitution

It is not necessary to correct it, but to develop and adopt a new one that meets the realities of today.

[SergeySeverny]

good news! just happy!

[knn54]

The Hague is in line ...

[Oml]

I agree that Russia should be above all this Western "justice", but our courts, which do not have their own opinion, must somehow be changed.

[Bath]

And in general, do not let the nasty geyropeytsy climb to the people who happily live less and less with the shadow of the fairest Yeltsin constitution, which the Americans, by the way, helped and write to, in which the Russians are deprived of their statehood

[aleks. 1986]

Quote: afdjhbn67

Quote: sa-ag

Strange affair,

I laugh and sad from your childhood joy .. In fact, they banned the only court that gave hope to find the truth to a simple citizen, when all Russian courts refused - therefore, Vasya Pupkin, if he loses a court in the country, he can smoke bamboo - it works against us ordinary citizens, and not Against the authorities, as always, sit and rejoice ....
PS, the State very much and much lost in the ECHR - all the same, they managed to push this decision over to them .. and once again I will repeat any independence and there was nothing to stand next to ..

Nice to see an adequate opinion. For us, for civil society and for the common man who fell under the millstone of law enforcement agencies, there was at least some hope for the triumph of justice, even after years, but still. When its national judicial system does not exist, the principles that are laid down in the same Constitution are violated everywhere, the ECHR and its decisions were a clear example of the malfunctioning of the entire law enforcement system and some kind of guideline to which we should strive. Now the authorities, trying first of all to protect themselves from unprofitable decisions, are making an absurd decision that directly contradicts the Constitution itself.

[skifd]

"Pupkin" mentioned "Many times" to "stewards" by "rights" ... Vasya who ... "Rows" on the ECHR etu .. Jump in real life, he will never "use" it .. It's not easy to get ( neither physically nor financially overwhelming). And therefore it is to him as "Fermat's theorem" - just "Thory". And all this "cry" over the loss of something "ephemeral" is simply ridiculous. But yes, people who are financially and legally better off may be hurt to some extent. Then "cry" for them, and finally leave alone the notorious "Vasya Pupkin", to whom you really do not care, he has already been tormented by heartburn from hiccups from your "worries" about him.

[Volzhanin]

Krivenko, slanting, through opu, but better than nothing.
What is it just now? Did the rooster come closer?

[Gardamir]

Oh rejoiced, do not tell my keyboard. Have you even read your own constitution?
Preamble of the Constitution of the Russian Federation latest update

We, the multinational people of the Russian Federation,

united by a common fate in their land,

Affirming human rights and freedoms, civil peace and harmony,

preserving the historical state unity,

based on the universally recognized principles of equal rights and self-determination of peoples,

honoring the memory of the ancestors who conveyed to us love and respect for the Fatherland, faith in goodness and justice,

reviving the sovereign statehood of Russia and affirming the inviolability of its democratic foundation,

Striving to ensure the well-being and prosperity of Russia,

proceeding from responsibility for our Motherland before present and future generations,

Conscious of yourself as part of the global community,

accept the CONSTITUTION of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

And now the preamble to the US Constitution

We, the people of the United States, in order to form a better Union, establish justice, guarantee internal peace, ensure joint defense, promote common prosperity and consolidate the benefits of freedom for us and our offspring, proclaim and establish the present Constitution for the United States of America.

[imugn]

But why did Russia refuse to extradite Gusinsky, and even paid him?

[Jurkovs]

I do not see any feat. You must immediately do any business to the end, and not chop the dog’s tail in parts. It is necessary to immediately introduce the concept into the Constitution that national legislation takes precedence over international, as this is done in the USA. In such matters it is not a sin to learn.

[antiexpert]

this is not enough - it is necessary to change the entire Yeltsin constitution, which is written under the dictation of the USA!

[Oleg1080]

Time will tell whether to rejoice or cry when all the pitfalls pop up. But at least we’re moving at least somewhere, otherwise it’s just some kind of stagnation.

[Zomanus]

Here you go.
The Central Bank has already ordered 90% of the profits to be given to the state.
Now we are untying ourselves from international courts.
It remains with ideology and censorship to decide the matter.
Whatever films and history books are released at the expense of the state,
in which this state is watered by slops.

[pimen]

in fact, such issues should not even be discussed

[Dimon-chik-79]

Quote: figter

An appeal to the ECHR was the last hope of many "mere mortals" to achieve at least some justice. The outrages committed in our courts are beyond any scope, and that is why there are so many appeals to the European Court. And nothing to do with the "fifth columns", "liberals", "gayropes", etc. these people, deceived by their state, in whose name are often simply shameful decisions, did not. If the decisions of the domestic courts were justified, lawful and fair, no one would apply to the ECHR, they would simply not be accepted into their proceedings and considered there. And now it turns out that because of a handful of detainees who have sued the "wealth" three times plundered from each other, ordinary people have lost their last aid.

It's hard to disagree with these! But there is a hope that this decision will not apply to mere mortals. "As Pligin said earlier, the draft law does not cause any damage to" investment activity or the protection of private property "in Russia." Cases of possible failure to comply or appeal to the assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation are undoubtedly will be sporadic. "
But in any case, real sovereignty will be with us only when the number of compradors in power will be significantly less! What kind of sovereignty can we talk about if, on top of that, many of our officials at various levels have bills and housing abroad where their children study and live. Even without taking into account the source of their income, if any of them click on a bank account then what decisions will he make in his activities ?!

[Old warrior]

The most important step will be the abolition of the moratorium on the Death Penalty and the beginning of the application of this cancellation against criminals who have inflicted Damage to the Country on a particularly large scale, maniacs, terrorists, etc. I like this definition - the Supreme Measure of Social Protection, there is something in it of justice ...

[sergach]

The death penalty will not solve anything. But the likelihood of a miscarriage of justice is high. In addition, it has long been proven that the death penalty does not affect crime statistics. Imprisonment is a rather severe punishment. Where does such an obsession with the death penalty from many of our citizens come from?

[sharp-lad]

As they say, life on Solovki for life-sentenced prisoners is worse than death itself. And this is the best punishment for criminals. Again, in the event of a miscarriage of justice, it is possible to restore justice. How many were shot Chikatilo instead of u-b-l-y-d-d?

[Captain45]

Briefly, who was the initiator and who was against such a legislative initiative:
Along with "United Russia" Pligin, the authors of the bill are the first deputy head of the Just Russia faction Mikhail Emelyanov, the representative of the Communist Party faction Vasily Likhachev, the first deputy head of the LDPR faction Alexei Didenko, and a member of the Federation Council Andrei Klishas.
Three deputies from "Fair Russia" voted against the adoption of the bill. According to Dmitry Gudkov, he himself, Sergei Petrov and Ilya Ponomarev's card were against Gudkov.
Those. as we can see for a certain sovereignty in the legislation of the Russian Federation from the decisions of the ECHR there were representatives of all parliamentary factions, in the Duma there is some unification of the interests of parties regarding the independence of Russia, i.e. "as the running bugs and marathons say, we have hope for a chance" (c) Ilf and Petrov "Twelve Chairs".

[Maks-80]

Gusinsky, Khodorkovsky and 2 other runaway former oligarchs put 4 minuses to this article

[AK64]

One should start with the fact that no "international law" exists. Where is it, show me this code of laws?
There is a certain amount of interstate agreements (bilateral and multilateral); but their observance is not necessary - any of them may be denounced by the participant.

On the whole, the very thesis about the primacy of "international law" over local law (1) contradicts the basic principles of democracy ("in your city, the mayor is more important than the president!") And actually means transferring control over the government to the wrong hands. (And those who introduced this provision could not help but understand this.)

[sergach]

Hmm, I am only for such decisions. But nothing that the modern constitution clearly and unequivocally postulated the priority of international agreements over national law? That is, according to the current constitution, any decision of international courts cannot contradict the Russian constitution by definition. Deputies have a mess with logic.

[Belousov]

Why did only half the battle? Why not legislate the priority of national legislation over international? Why not return the Central Bank to the hands of the state? And many more why.

[rJIiOK]

The radio sounded in the background, was the transmission of the Echo of Moscow. There they screamed with foam at the mouth that the abolition of the supremacy of the decisions of the ECHR is savagery, it is uncivilized!
And they say that we do not have democracy when frank foreign agents broadcast their point of view.

[Gardamir]

Echo of Moscow transmission ... foreign agents

Just don’t talk. that you don’t know. Radio Echo of Moscow is supported by Gazprom money, that is, it is the Kremlin radio. They just imitate the opposition.

[rJIiOK]

Well, you know, obviously people believe what they say!
Suppose it’s kind of funded by a radio there, although I don’t know that. But all those people who are invited to the studio are not financed, and they broadcast there.

[Kombrig]

Quote: rJIiOK

Suppose it’s kind of funded by a radio there, although I don’t know that. But all those people who are invited to the studio are not financed, and they broadcast there.

By your logic, if I allocated money to a certain terrorist organization, then I finance only this organization, and not its militants - performers ... The simple rule, "who feeds a girl, dances her," has not been canceled yet ..

[sw6513]

I have long been waiting for this good news! And the truth is that the kingdom of gays and lesbians can judge our absurd compatriots. Let them not poke their nose here, they are not welcome ..

[Denis Skiff]

Quote: Dembel 77

The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is granted the right to declare unenforceable decisions of the European Court of Human Rights if such decisions contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation

Finally. Thank God - wait! And I want to believe that the adoption of this amendment to the law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, important for Russian statehood, is only the first sign in a series of other important laws that should serve to strengthen the true sovereignty of our state. It is a pity that some laws are not retroactive. How many crooks like Gusinsky could be brought to justice.

And those who are against the wall without trial.

[Kolka82]

Quote: Saratoga833

Quote: afrikanez

Still a little amend the Constitution

It is not necessary to correct it, but to develop and adopt a new one that meets the realities of today.

Fortunately, there is a "role model" ...

[Teplohod]

Sovereignty - when you can stop supplying gas at any time and they will be asked for it from an unscrupulous intermediary, or they will resort to apologize for their deeds and extradite criminals. Sovereignty - when citizens live luxuriously in any foreign economic situation, and hundreds of thousands of leading world scientists, engineers and other figures lurk about your borders waiting for citizenship. Sovereignty - when the decisions of your court are respected and enforced throughout the world.

[your1970]

Teplohod
little things left - find somewhere a couple of carrier fleets and a couple of hundred military bases all over the earth, and then yes - there will be full sovereignty under your program. Besides the United States (and even there not all citizens live luxuriously, far from all) - there is no such sovereignty on Earth now - alas, alas ..

In the meantime, we will not find, alas, and ah, we will do with the sovereignty that is

[Gormenghast]

At first, the ECHR looked very nice, until it took up rights thieves and homosexuals.

And then it was not funny.

How can a Strasbourg court make any binding decisions if the system of European values ​​contradicts Russian values? There is no defense of the formally heretical and even blasphemous "storage".

Well, it's not worth talking about politics at all. Let him protect the Wahhabite refugees from burghers, the rights of captured and imprisoned terrorists, the rights of same-sex "partnerships" from the heterosexual minority - if they so wish. And somehow we ourselves will decide their questions.

[Klibanophoros]

Another blah blah on the topic of "Getting off your knees", and so on for 15 years in a row ...

[bsk_mna54]

The Duma is engaged in nonsense. All whistling occurs by shifting problems to each other. You just need to cancel those articles of the constitution that prevent Russia from living:
1. Spit on a gay court and forget about it
2. To expel from the central bank all the privileged swindlers from the liberalists headed by the "honored" (like Kudrin) Madame Nabiulina, to stop feeding the economy, but rather to deal with their country.
3. In all states there is a certain policy at the state level, and in Russia it is prohibited by the constitution. Send all such figures away. It is necessary to have our own state ideology, to fasten Russia on moral qualities.
Such a constitution is not needed by the Russian people.

[1536]

Good tidings! Still, a couple of Americans should be condemned under our laws for calls for ethnic hatred or for undermining the foundations of the state in order to see priority in reality.

[Jozhkin Cat]

Will the next central bank be?

[Kirgoudou]

I would like to.
Untie the country from the buck.

[pettabyte]

Quote: larand

But this is only in 2016 at the end of 2015 (previously planned 75%). And the cunning Nabeulins immediately reduced the profit of 2015 from 56 to 22 billion rubles.

Undoing!

[potalevl]

What a hurray? What is international law? Don't tell my slippers. The United States wanted to spit on everyone, the UN - "Uncle Sam's pocket dog". The US Federal Reserve is a private shop that was created by several wealthy swindlers and convinced the whole world that the pieces of paper they print privately are the real money for which the whole world should buy and sell material values ​​and goods. At the end of the era of wrestling-drunkards, GDP reported that in Russia all prices and economic indicators are only in rubles, and so on. Once again, we estimate the country's wealth in terms of "dolyars". As soon as we hinted that we will conduct trade operations in the national currencies of the counterparty countries, you will get terror and other world dirty tricks. As soon as the world gives up this "green paper", so immediately all the "rich pinocchio", both our own and imported ones, will become beggars, like church rats. Do they need it? They will fight for their good without sparing anyone or anything. Until the Fed and others like them rule the ball on our planet, wars, terror, chaos and lawlessness will reign. Well, God alone knows what awaits us in the future. Here's a fairy tale.

[Slavianin_37]

Gusinsky to be arrested, to his jail, and all the money to take, plus interest !!!

[unfriendly]

It was necessary to do this after the first precedent. Better late than never.

[Goldmitro]

Quote: Mitek

It is high time. In the ass their laws!

Finally it dawned that being a country of not frightened idiots, besides, is very REMAINABLE!

[Governor]

Why are you so happy? The ECHR interferes with Russia so much, seriously?
The WTO is hindering Russia, not the ECHR! But no one is going to leave the WTO, just as they will not introduce the death penalty...
As a matter of fact, again a batch of noodles was delivered for the hungry. Well, for the fans there is a reason to “seriously talk about HPP.”
Glory to the king!

[fomich1977]

I warmly welcome such steps by our leadership. As long as some “uncles from the street” tell us what is right and what is wrong, there will be no order in the house!

[Radogiz]

We need to leave all these international courts and parliamentary assemblies. It is nonsense for a sovereign country to hang foreign control around its neck.

[CRASH]

I understand if we had normal courts, but now even the ECHR won’t help women with children whose husbands kick them out onto the street and sell their apartments, because... they are the owners, and the wife and child are registered in another place, this famous law that made many people homeless, old people, women, children.

[Seneca]

The author is either (expletive)...or a typical parasite of budget propaganda. And everyone who rejected him is (expletive). This is another step towards the country’s self-isolation and falling out of the international civil game. Economically, we are already losing greatly to world leaders... we are already far behind technologically and this gap will continue to increase. And for a Russian citizen this means that he will be completely dependent on the operation of the system. .which has already rejected international law...and will decide his fate at its own discretion and benefit.

[Lily]

This is really the first step. I would even say, unsteady, timid steps. And the step will be when the Russian authorities finally dare to write in the Constitution that national legislation has the dominant right on the territory of the Russian Federation and in resolving all disputes. And the next step should be that all disputes should be resolved only in Russian courts, like the Americans and the Chinese. But this is no longer the case with this leadership.

[Hammer]

What the hell are you all talking about? This law only means that when the government once again squeezes business from people, they will not be able to hide behind the European court. It is stupid to interpret this as a “return of sovereignty.” Giving up the dollar is the real return of sovereignty

[sailor roman]

I believe that the time has come to adopt a new Constitution that meets the requirements for the development of the economy and defense capability of Russia and the tightening of laws against terrorists, bandits, thieves, bureaucrats, scammers, liberals and their accomplices. This cannot be delayed... Today, Russians will support such a decision by the country's leadership.

[Robert Nevsky]

VERY GLAD - YOU WELL DONE!

[user3970]

Who are the judges? When the Constitutional Court moved from Moscow to St. Petersburg, the GDP gave the chairman of the court, Zorkin, a shack worth $15 million as his personal property; the rest of the members received gifts of shacks that were a little cheaper. Regarding the Supreme Court. I remember how, all over the country on CT on Solovyov’s program, the Chairman of the Supreme Court of Russia, Lebedev, was accused of receiving a bribe in the amount of $2,8 million. The Chairman of the Court, Lebedev, in response to the public accusation: 1) filed a lawsuit for libel; 2) shot (punched in the face), shot himself; 3) resigned? He said nothing. This means he admitted the fact of the bribe. We admit, alas, Russian judges are prostitutes. Regarding the introduction of the death penalty. Let me remind you... A terrorist attack in Belarus several years ago. The old man appointed two children as terrorists, and despite the alibi, they were quickly shot by the court. What about the Chikatilo case? Let's immediately legitimize the "troikas".

[Mwg]

“That is, the ECHR sided with Mr.,” “when the ECHR sided with, as they say, the working people” - expressions like these indicate the author’s legal illiteracy. In law, by definition, there is no concept of “taking sides,” there is a concept of “legally, illegally.” The court makes decisions based on the current law. Any court. And the fact that Mr. Gusinsky won the case indicates the work of a lawyer who found grounds for recovery, prepared and filed a claim

[colonel manuch]

A start ! Now it’s time, urgently, to restore order in the country: Deal with the “shift workers”, “effective managers” and other “swamp people” - they’ll stop ruling in Russia.

[Rossmk]

Now you can lay the hammer of justice on the decisions of all sorts of commissions

[Litsvin]

IT IS HIGH TIME TO INTRODUCE A CONSTITUTIONAL RULE (!!!), ACCORDING TO WHICH NATIONAL LAW PREVAILS OVER INTERNATIONAL LAW - THEN MANY OF THE PROBLEMS “IMAGINED” BY OUR WESTERN “WELL-WISHERS” WILL BE SOLVED. THIS STANDARD SHOULD BE INTRODUCED BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION ON THE BASIS OF A NATIONAL REFERNDUM - THIS WILL TAKE THE ROUND FROM UNDER THE FEET OF THE “HOMEGROWN LIBERASTS” AND THEIR WESTERN PUPPEmasterS, WILL NOT ALLOW THEM TO SPECULATE. IN ADDITION, YOU NEED TO EXIT MANY SO-CALLED INTERNATIONAL FORMATS, TREATIES, ETC. CRAP INVENTED BY WESTERN POLITICIANS. NOW MANY OF THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS WHICH RUSSIA INCLUDES ARE PLAYING AGAINST IT - WHATEVER RUSSIA DOES, IT IS KNOWLY AT A GREAT BECAUSE THE RULES OF THE GAME ARE SETTED BY WESTERN DEMOCRACIES. AND SO - RUSSIA WILL NOT BE IN THESE FORMATS - AND WILL NOT OWE ANYONE ANYTHING. WESTERN POLITICIANS WILL SHOUT AND ALL - AND RUSSIA WILL GO FURTHER WITH ITS MIND: "WOLVES HOWL - THE CARAVAN IS GOING."
Now all sorts of Jewish-Masonic clubs like the Soros Foundation need to be closed in Russia - quickly and strictly with legal wording - THEY PRESENT A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. And deport the home-grown “Gusinskys” to their historical-ethnic homeland - let them hold a rally in the Knesset there on how to build a state there. We, the Slavs and other indigenous peoples of Rus', will build our own Slavic states ourselves without such “Gusinskys”. In addition, if the fact of their participation in the direct undermining of the national interests of the state is established - in their zone, beyond the Arctic Circle, there, of course, is not the Sinai Peninsula, but people also live there.
And also Slavic brothers. Is it really true that the liberal policy of Tsarist Russia “with an eye to what Western democracies will say” of the early 20th century teaches us nothing? They dissolved liberalism led by the Jewish kahal - Blank, Bronstein, Sverdlov, Rosenfeld, etc. and lost Russia, and with it tens of millions of Russian people, they put their gene pool in the ground. But it cost the AUTHORITIES - Tsar Nicholas 2 and the State Duma - all these traitors who were corrupting the state from within for the money of American sponsors under the plausible pretext of fighting for workers' rights, democracy, etc. crap, arrest, put on trial and execute on charges of high treason - and that’s it, the HISTORY OF RUSSIA would have taken a completely different, evolutionary path of development. Even after 100 years, we have not cleared up the mess brewed by Western democrats in 1917. As for the irretrievably lost gene pool, this is generally a problem of problems. Hence the extremely low population in Russia. For a colossus with such an area, the population should be at least 300-400 million people.
Therefore, stop flirting with Western democrats - we must finally understand that “the WEST” is our enemy - it needs the absence of Russia as such and direct access to Russia’s natural resources. Everything that sucks is liberal nonsense to brainwash illiterate people. And such “Soros and Gusinskys” are the conductor of this liberalism in Russia.
Legislators should have a simple principle: “The laws of Russia are laws for Russia, and other laws are not laws for us!!!”

[Old Schweik]

As for me, the IMF can also be destroyed. Stop feeding the parasites.