Military Review

Friends rivals and allies

18
Friends rivals and allies“Nobody will embrace the immense,” Academician Boris Chertok complained in his four-volume memoir, “People and Rockets,” sincerely believing that he wrote everything about the space of the USSR and Russia, but nobody even tried to write about the subject of such work.


The author of this article, having worked at the Moscow Order of Lenin (later twice the Order of Lenin) at the Institute of Thermal Engineering for exactly thirty years (1970 – 2000), of which 13 years was the lead designer of mobile ground-based missile systems (PGRK), and then for the same years - deputy head of the combat department control and protection from unauthorized missile launches, will try to eliminate this disadvantage due to its capabilities. Especially since he is just 71 year - a child's age for writing memoirs.

COMPETITION OF MAJOR AND IMPROVED SECRETITY


As we all know, in the Soviet Union there were two chief designers in the space theme - Sergey Korolev (later Vasily Mishin) and Valentin Glushko, three main designers on missile combat strategic topics - Sergey Korolev, Mikhail Yangel (later Vladimir Utkin and Stanislav Konyukhov) and Vladimir Chelomey (later Herbert Efremov), two main designers of ballistic missiles for submarines (SLBMs) ​​- Vladimir Chelomey and Vladimir Makeev, three main designers of control systems of missiles - Nikolay Pilyugin (later Vladimir Lap gin), Boris Konoplyev (Sergeev and then Vladimir Jacob Isenberg) and Nicholas Semikhatov (later). All of them, since 1965, have been part of the system of the Ministry of General Machine Building and were engaged, mainly in relation to the Strategic Missile Forces (RVSN), mine missile complexes (RK) with liquid-propellant missiles.

Their competition practically led to the fact that gradually the issues of building the RK and their management more and more fell to the Strategic Missile Forces (General Staff, GURVO and NII-4), and the developers of unified command posts (KP) - Boris Aksyutin (then Alexander Leontenkov) and The combat control systems of the Missile Forces - Taras Sokolov (later Vitaly Melnik, Boris Mikhailov, Anatoly Greshnevikov, Vladimir Petukhov, Sergey Shpagin) worked directly on the orders of the Missile Forces.

The Ministry of Defense Industry at the Moscow Institute of Heating Engineering - Nikolai Mazurov and Alexander Nadiradze (Boris Lagutin, Yuri Solomonov) were engaged in tactical and operational-tactical combat missile themes with solid-propellant rockets, naturally mobile, by the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering, and then, after Alexander Nadiradze’s transition to a mobile strategic theme, Kolomenskoye KB engineering - Sergei Invincible.

Naturally, in the conditions of the strictest secrecy prevailing in the USSR, some chiefs received only fragmentary information from ministerial scientific and technical councils in the CPSU Central Committee and extremely rare meetings with the country's top commanders, and their deputies from the same secret collection Foreign Press about the Soviet Union. We will cite only two examples: none of the 173 copyright certificates of the honored inventor Alexander Nadiradze has yet been declassified; his name is missing even in the alphabetical index of the Russian State Library.

NEW GENERATION OF ROCKET COMPLEXES


By this time, the creation of third-generation rocket complexes was completed, each rocket cooperation found its own niche: Yuzhnoye Design Office - mine liquid rockets, Miass - SLBMs with both liquid and solid fuels, MIT - solid-fuel missiles for PGRK.

The development of a new generation of missiles began. They are:

- deep modernization of the mine-based P-36 (Voyevoda, or P-36М2) liquid-based amphibious rocket, tested at the Baikonur cosmodrome;

- new solid-propellant rocket RT-23 of mine and rail-based;

- Temp-2CM2 solid-fuel rocket ground-based missile that received the Topol index, or RT-1979PM in 2 year after specifying the direction of work in connection with the signing of the SALT-2 Agreement.

State flight tests of the RT-23 and Topol rockets were conducted at the Plesetsk cosmodrome. The Chairmen of the State Commissions were Colonel General Georgy Malinovsky, Head of the Main Directorate for the Operation of Missile Weapons (for RT-23) and First Deputy Head of the Main Directorate for Missiles, Lieutenant General Anatoly Funtikov (for the Topol complex).

According to the results of the flight tests of the RT-23 rocket, a decision was made to deploy it only as part of the 15P961 combat railway missile system (BZHRK), in the mine version, do not deploy the rocket and begin work on the PT-23UTX rocket.

It should be noted that the main requirements for the fourth-generation missile systems were not so much the traditional requirements for reducing the time of combat readiness and improving accuracy, as the issues of increasing the viability of the Republic of Kazakhstan. This was ensured by an increase in resistance to the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion of mine launchers, the creation of autonomous launchers for a PGRK (autonomous modules for BZhRK).

And it was here that cooperation of various cooperatives began for the first time.

COOPERATION BRINGS RESULTS


Having carried out the analysis of technical solutions for BZHRK 15P961 by Dmitriy Ustinov’s personal assignment, Alexander Vinogradov, Deputy Chief Designer - Head of the Integrated Division of the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering, proposed for BZHRK with the RT-23UTT rocket the principle of creating a train with three missiles from three autonomous modules.

The extremely unsuccessful and unreliable design of the RT-23UTTH rocket lifting system into a vertical position during the prelaunch preparation and launch of the BZHRK was replaced by the rocket rapid lifting system using a turbine with a powder pressure accumulator proposed and developed by the MIT development team under the supervision of the deputy head of the integrated department Valery Yefimov that he was later awarded the title of laureate of the State Prize of the USSR.

And finally, an unprecedented case - the Deputy Chief Designer of the Moscow Institute of Heat Engineering Vyacheslav Gogolev was included in the State Commission for the conduct of joint (Ministry of Defense and Industry) testing of missile systems with the RT-23UTTH rocket!

Somewhere in the middle of the 1980s, for the first time in the USSR, an interdepartmental council of three main designers of missile weapons (Alexander Nadiradze, Vladimir Utkin, Vladimir Makeev) was created to work on the unification of land-based and sea-based missiles for the next generation of RK. The direct result of these works was the creation of a sea-based missile “Bulava-30” in Russia and the development of a new generation of land-based missiles, currently being carried out by the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering.

But back to the end of the 1980's.

MOSCOW RESPONDING TO WASHINGTON MOBILITY


In response to the development in the United States at the Moscow Institute of Heat Engineering, work began on the creation of a mobile version of the heavy rocket developed by Yuzhnoye Design Bureau RT-23UTTX of the mobile soil complex on the 12-axle chassis and mobile soil start with the compact Courier on the 5- axle chassis.

The main designers of the missiles were issued technical proposals for the creation of new and modernization of the existing missile complexes.

Yuzhnoye Design Bureau proposed the modernization of the RT-23UTTH rocket (the work was discontinued due to the collapse of the USSR) and the rocket for the mobile ground stationary RK Universal.

The NPO Mechanical Engineering suggested creating an Albatross rocket with a planned winged unit.

MIT was proposed to upgrade the missile and the Topol complex (Topol-M) with the development of a new launcher on the 8-axis chassis.

Following the review of these works in September 1989, the decision of the Commission of the Presidium of the USSR Council of Ministers on military-industrial issues was issued, providing for the development of the Topol-M universal missile, both mine (15P165 index, head company - Yuzhnoye Design Bureau) and mobile ground-based (index 15П155, parent company - MIT).

The work on the creation of a single universal monoblock rocket was also divided:

- the first stage of the rocket was developed by Yuzhnoye Design Bureau;

- the second and third stages - Moscow Institute of Heat Engineering;

- the planned combat unit (subsequently the development that did not take place) - NPO mechanical engineering.

It also envisaged the assembly of mass-produced missiles for silo-based vehicles at the Pavlogorodsky machine-building plant, and for mobile-based assemblies - at the Votkinsk engineering plant.

Later, the Strategic Missile Forces formulated and issued to the industry tactical and technical requirements for the development of the complex, consisting of three parts. The first part - the general one - was signed by all three main designers and their main cooperation. The second - the requirements for the mine RK - was signed only by Yuzhnoye Design Bureau and its cooperation, the third - the requirements for the PGRK - only by the Moscow Institute of Heating Engineering.

The tactical and technical requirements (TTT) of the Ministry of Defense provided for the creation of a new unified command post (TFD) 15B244, while it was stipulated that the development of this TFD should be carried out on a separate customer's TTT. The developer of the UKP was the Central Design Bureau of Heavy Machinery (General Director - General Designer Alexander Leontenkov, his first deputy - Gleb Vasilyev).

For the first time in the practice of developing missile complexes, it was planned to include stationary and mobile command posts of the division as well as an air command post of the division into the complex. True, the cunning author of this article obtained from the Chief of the Main Directorate of Rocket Armament, Colonel-General Alexander Ryazhskikh, the notes to the text of the TTT still valid to this day that “the said command posts are developed for individual TTT MOs within separate R & D and are included with the complex after adopting them in the Soviet Army. "

The development of a draft design and design documentation has begun.

It was envisaged that the first for joint flight tests would be a mine variant with the placement of missiles in the converted 15P030 and 15P035 launchers developed by the OKN Vympel design engineer (the chief designer Vladimir Baskakov and Dmitry Dragoon, who soon replaced him at this position, then had to use the unit, he also had to flush the box, and he also had to flush the box, and he also had to use the device, he also had to flush the box, and he also had to use the device, he also had to flush the box, and he also had to use the box to pull out the box, and he also had to flush the box, and he also had to flush the box, and he also had to use the box to pull out the box, and he also had to flush the box, and he also had to flush the box, and he had to pull out the box, and he also had to use the box to pull out the box, and then he had to remove the box, and he also had to flush the box with the rack panel, and he dragged the equipment out of the box, and he dragged the kit out of the box, and he dragged the equipment out of the box. P-36 missiles (silo index 15P018) developed by the special engineering design bureau (general director Nikolay Trofimov, chief designer Vladimir Guskov).

In connection with the collapse of the USSR, the direction of work on the 15P165 complex was somewhat clarified:

- the development of the first stage of the rocket was transferred to the Moscow Institute of Heat Engineering, and its assembly to the Votkinsky Machine-Building Plant;

- it was decided, first of all for financial reasons, to abandon the development of a new PCD and upgrade the PCU 15В222, which had previously passed joint tests as part of the mine RC 15P018М and 15P060;

- a transition to Russian cooperation was planned (and almost completely realized later).

The first launch of the mine rocket was conducted on 20 on December 1994 of the year from the Plesetsk cosmodrome with the converted Yuzhno-1 mine.

Then missile launches were also carried out from the South-2 platform, from silo, converted by serial technology. The last, tenth, launch was held in February 2000 of the year from the Svetlaya-1 site of the 15P718М converted using standard silo technology.

The 15P165 complex was recommended by the State Commission in May 2000 for adoption by the Russian army and adopted two months later by a special presidential decree.

Experimental combat duty of the first regiment (in truncated composition) of the 15P165 complex was launched in December 1997 of the Tatishchevsky missile division (Saratov region).
Author:
Originator:
http://nvo.ng.ru/armament/2015-11-27/8_coldwar.html
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 6 December 2015 08: 29 New
    0
    For memoirs will go
    1. Civil
      Civil 6 December 2015 21: 20 New
      +1
      Yuzhnoye Design Bureau and handed over to the Americans about our Boundary, I propose bombing this enterprise one hundred and first time as well as the SICH engine, we will hand over our secrets to the enemy ... Israel is bombing and nothing, we’re worse ... see Syria if we have under the ass, the issues are not resolved
      1. mahor
        mahor 22 January 2016 22: 51 New
        0
        Quote: Civil
        Yuzhnoye Design Bureau and handed over to the Americans about our Boundary, I propose bombing this enterprise one hundred and first time as well as the SICH engine, we will hand over our secrets to the enemy ... Israel is bombing and nothing, we’re worse ... see Syria if we have under the ass, the issues are not resolved



        Unfortunately late ...
  2. Throw
    Throw 6 December 2015 09: 26 New
    +2
    The author's surname is "speaking" in a military way wassat
    1. Grim Reaper
      Grim Reaper 6 December 2015 22: 04 New
      +3
      There is no such word that could not be the name of a Jew (c) ☺
      1. Grim Reaper
        Grim Reaper 6 December 2015 22: 21 New
        +2
        Oh, someone minus me (on the drum in general) But for the youth I’ll explain. This is a good old (exactly good) joke from the times of the USSR. Not what you thought.
  3. Old26
    Old26 6 December 2015 09: 28 New
    +4
    I read this article in IEE. Suitable for newspaper publication. But not more. With all due respect to the author, there are a lot of blunders in the indices. You can agree, so it is with the fact that we have very few books related to such topics. And if they go out, then in a very scanty circulation, excluding their distribution.
    In principle, books only came out:
    1. In general, an overview version - Karpenko. His books on strategic and tactical complexes
    2. The anniversary book of MIT
    3. Kingi KB "Yuzhny" and GRTs Makeev
    That's basically all that can be found on the net. There is no and it is impossible to see even in the electronic version a book about Arsenal's missile systems, materials on missile defense (about a dozen books). And the aviation theme does not spoil
    1. mahor
      mahor 22 January 2016 22: 53 New
      0
      I advise you to read the military and r-beznyufaktoriya ..
  4. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 6 December 2015 10: 16 New
    +2
    I'd like to see the new BZHRK, another hello to NATO!
    1. 222222
      222222 6 December 2015 10: 48 New
      +2
      dchegrinec SU Today, 10:16 AM
      I'd like to see the new BZHRK, another hello to NATO! "
      symbolically !! ..
      -Barguzin is a powerful east wind blowing in the middle part of Baikal.
      It arises due to the flow of cold air from the Daurian steppes, has the character of a bora. The speed is usually less than 20 m / s, the duration is several hours. He reaches particular power in the fall.
      --The glorious sea - the sacred Baikal,
      Glorious ship - mullion barrel.
      Hey, Barguzin, move the shaft,
      Well done to swim not far away. (Folk song "Glorious sea - sacred Baikal" ")
      1. Moore
        Moore 6 December 2015 16: 34 New
        +1
        Entertaining picture.
        By analogy, somewhere there is a FMS - Stationary Railway Missile Complex smile
  5. Old26
    Old26 6 December 2015 12: 06 New
    +2
    What it will be called in the series is not yet known. This is a topic designation. And apparently the serial name will be different, less symbolic.
  6. Old26
    Old26 6 December 2015 19: 03 New
    0
    Quote: CERHJ
    There are not only a lot of mistakes. There are factual errors. Then, the whole article is just an ode to MIT

    How do you want? To have an ode to the Makeyevites or "Yuzhny"?

    Quote: CERHJ
    In general, on the topic of Celina-2 with a 15Zh62 rocket based on MAZ 7907, the MITovtsy "got lost". Well, of course, how not to praise your "native nest"!

    But was the product not southerners ??? And here MITovtsy - I personally do not know ... Maybe enlighten?

    Quote: CERHJ
    What harm did the MIT of the times of EBN. By essentially switching all the missile themes to itself exclusively to ourselves, we still cannot evaluate

    Then I agree. Don't rate now

    Quote: CERHJ
    Taking advantage of their special access to EBN, they easily pushed Makeev’s design bureau with Sineva and a number of other complexes (Liner) from the marine theme. Having breathed in the Navy their Bulava, with such reliability that there is still doubt in it whether it was worth taking it into service. the recent launch of two rockets at once. One of which is unsuccessful only confirms this.

    It has always been that way. Taking advantage of his availability, Sergei Pavlovich was able to "pull in" his 75th car in parallel with the Yangelevskaya R-16.
    Taking advantage of his accessibility to the “body,” Makeev pushed Tyurin aside in his time. About everything else. EMNIP was TTZ for a solid-propellant rocket. I can't say anything about the pollutants yet.
    But in any case, the Makeyevites offered by no means a solid-fuel SLBM, which means in violation of the TTZ. The last launch of the Bulava - so much has been written about this that it was impossible to say plainly. Especially based on materials from our media.

    Quote: CERHJ
    somehow everything was torn off, what wasn’t mine 15P060, which instead of UR-100N UTTH put on duty as many as 56 missiles?

    Then I agree, crap. At least in 2 divisions it was deployed. In Russia, in the amount of one regiment, the rest in Ukraine ...

    Quote: CERHJ
    ... Here is a photo of the ICBM Courier.

    The photo shows one of the versions of the Kurier ICBM launcher ...
    1. mahor
      mahor 22 January 2016 22: 58 New
      0
      Taking advantage of his accessibility to the “body,” Makeev pushed Tyurin aside in his time. About everything else. EMNIP was TTZ for a solid-propellant rocket. I can't say anything about the pollutants yet.
      But in any case, the Makeyevites offered by no means a solid-fuel SLBM, which means in violation of the TTZ. The last launch of the Bulava - so much has been written about this that it was impossible to say plainly. Especially based on materials from our media.

      Ah ah how bad! am Tyurin had problems with the reliability of the first stage and he did not reach the declared range .. At this time, Makeev’s liquid machine flew to an intercontinental range.
  7. Grim Reaper
    Grim Reaper 6 December 2015 22: 15 New
    +4
    The article is interesting. Not a specialist will understand anything at all (like me). The specialist (there are suspicions) will catch a hernia from laughter. A huge request to the team VO: Hire finally the editor. Not a joke. Almost none of the authors read the text even at a time. With rare exceptions ...
  8. Old26
    Old26 8 December 2015 22: 02 New
    0
    Quote: CERHJ
    Well, here is more detailed -http: //rvsn.ruzhany.info/uragan005.html.

    To be honest, I don’t remember in the anniversary book of MIT that there was even a word about "Tselina-2", And I have a little more confidence in this publication than in a good Internet resource. On it, by the way, the chassis indices are confused. But up to look to be absolutely sure. The computer is out of order, I am writing from a netbook, but there is a book in the archive. Look for
  9. Old26
    Old26 8 December 2015 23: 28 New
    0
    I now, dear SERHJ I looked through the anniversary book of MIT and, unfortunately, did not find absolutely anything that would concern the Celina-2 complex. There is a mention of work in cooperation with the KBYU on the "Universal" theme, a mention of completed and unrealized projects, but there is silence about "Tselina-2". Of course, I do not exclude such a possibility, but I am afraid that the work on cooperation has not begun, since everything ended with a test of the chassis.
  10. Restinfiction
    Restinfiction 19 September 2019 17: 13 New
    0
    Is it possible to somehow contact the author of the article?