Military Review

In Severodvinsk began testing of individual systems of the cruiser "Marshal Ustinov"

39
In the center of the ship repair "Zvezdochka" began testing individual systems of the missile cruiser of the Federation Council "Marshal Ustinov", reports MIC with reference to the press service of the enterprise.


The cruiser "Marshal Ustinov" launched, Severodvinsk, 2013 g

The cruiser is undergoing repairs and modernization at this shipyard with 2011 g.

"Shipwrights" Asterisks "and counterparty organizations have begun mooring trials on individual systems of the ship, mainly in the mechanical part," - said in a release.

Earlier it was reported that the cruiser will return to service in 2016.

"Marshal Ustinov" was founded in 1978 at the Nikolaev plant, in the Northern fleet adopted in 1986. It underwent modernization in the mid-90s at the Severnaya Verf shipyard (St. Petersburg).

Help newspaper: "" Marshal Ustinov "- missile cruiser project 1164" Atlant ". Its displacement is 11,38 thousand tons, length - 186 meters, width - 20,8 meters, speed - up to 34 knots (about 63 km / h), cruising range - about 8 thousands of miles, crew - 510 people. The main armament - 16 launchers of supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles P-500 "Basalt", capable of carrying nuclear warheads. There are two more such cruisers in the Russian Navy: the Moscow (Black Sea Fleet) and the Varyag (Pacific Fleet). ”
Photos used:
http://razgromflota.ru/
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Teberii
    Teberii 4 December 2015 08: 32 New
    +7
    Another powerful cruiser does not interfere. Although building a new one would be better.
    1. Cormorants
      Cormorants 4 December 2015 09: 20 New
      +2
      A good addition to the Northern Fleet!
      1. marlin1203
        marlin1203 4 December 2015 09: 46 New
        35
        We are modernizing everything. We operate the backlog of shipbuilders of the USSR. A deep bow to our grandfathers, who created in the 70s a weapon that protects us in 2015.
        1. Alexey Boukin
          Alexey Boukin 4 December 2015 12: 17 New
          +2
          Quote: marlin1203
          A deep bow to our grandfathers, who created in the 70s a weapon that protects us in 2015.

          Well, if all the grandchildren understood this ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. vodolaz
      vodolaz 4 December 2015 11: 29 New
      +3
      I saw “Moscow” in Sevastopol, it’s impressive.
      1. Penetrator
        Penetrator 4 December 2015 13: 10 New
        +3
        And if they saw Peter the Great, they would have fainted smile
  2. Magic archer
    Magic archer 4 December 2015 08: 41 New
    +4
    On another thread, Oleg Kaptsov wrote about Ustinov-Moscow’s sister. It’s interesting what exactly Moscow and Varyag will modernize and how will they be improved?
    1. Captain45
      Captain45 4 December 2015 08: 54 New
      +8
      Quote: Magic Archer
      On another thread, Oleg Kaptsov wrote about Ustinov-Moscow’s sister. It’s interesting what exactly Moscow and Varyag will modernize and how will they be improved?

      I gave a comment on modernization, here is the full article:
      Mooring trials of “Marshal Ustinov” began
      Repair of the Marshal Ustinov missile cruiser has entered a new phase - since mid-November, Zvezdochka shipbuilders, with the participation of counterparty organizations, have begun mooring trials for individual ship systems, mainly in the mechanical part.
      During the modernization of the ship, in particular, new radar stations were installed. The cruiser received the Podberezovik three-coordinate long-range radar and the Fregat-M2M station with phased antenna arrays optimized for detecting low-flying targets. New radars were mounted instead of the MP-600 Voskhod radar and MP-710 Fregat-M radar, which were part of the MP-800 Flag radar complex installed on the ship during its construction.
      For reference: "Marshal Ustinov" refers to the missile cruisers of the 1164 Atlant project. Its displacement is 11,38 thousand tons, length - 186 meters, width - 20,8 meters, speed - up to 34 knots (about 63 kilometers per hour), cruising range - about 8 thousand miles, crew - 510 people. The ship is equipped with the P-1000 Vulcan anti-ship missile system and the S-300F Fort anti-aircraft missile system. The Russian Navy includes two more such missile cruisers: Moscow (the Black Sea Fleet) and Varyag (the Pacific Fleet).

      http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/71104/#cut
  3. netslave
    netslave 4 December 2015 08: 44 New
    +2
    Well, “Basalts” were replaced by “Volcanoes”.
  4. Svarog5570
    Svarog5570 4 December 2015 08: 53 New
    +1
    it's time to revive the power of the Navy
  5. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 4 December 2015 09: 08 New
    0
    The main thing is that the Russian Fleet is reborn! And this, as they say, will allow someone to moderate their "appetites"! Glory to the Russian Navy!
  6. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 4 December 2015 09: 15 New
    0
    Let's hope that the tests pass quickly and successfully.
  7. NEXUS
    NEXUS 4 December 2015 09: 15 New
    +1
    I listened to the story of the Atlantes chief designer, Valentin Ivanovich Mutikhin, in the program. He was amused by the fact that before the first passage of Atlant through the Bosphorus, the United States classified these ships not as cruisers, but as anti-submarine ships.
  8. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 4 December 2015 09: 16 New
    0
    The main armament is 16 launchers of the P-500 Bazalt supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads.
    and SAM "favorite"?
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 4 December 2015 09: 52 New
      +1
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      and SAM "favorite"

      Well, it’s kind of like a defensive weapon, and not the main one. yes
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 4 December 2015 22: 16 New
        0
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Well, it’s kind of like a defensive weapon, and not the main one.

        not a fact, ZRkoy can also be blasted on a surface target is not bad ...
  9. pascal309
    pascal309 4 December 2015 09: 20 New
    0
    on the cruiser are not “basalts” but “volcanoes”.
  10. Obstructia
    Obstructia 4 December 2015 09: 55 New
    +5
    The topic is contrived, but still what a blessing that in the USSR there were not "effective managers", but adequate people. They left such a backlog that we are still floundering on it.
  11. tinibar
    tinibar 4 December 2015 10: 00 New
    0
    Quote: Cormorants
    A good addition to the Northern Fleet!

    Oh, we would have ten such things! In general, how much can you carry all the Soviet ?! But what a handsome infection!
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 4 December 2015 10: 08 New
      +6
      Quote: tinibar
      Oh, we would have ten such things! In general, how much can you carry all the Soviet ?! But what a handsome infection!

      Unfortunately, we have lost the school of building ships of the first rank for more than 20 years. We are talking about building aircraft carriers, but in reality we are building ships with a displacement of 5 tons for decades. Of course we need such ships, but when we reach such a level of construction of such ships This God knows.
      Best regards hi
      1. xtur
        xtur 4 December 2015 10: 20 New
        +1
        > Unfortunately, we have lost the school of building ships of the first rank for more than 20 years. We are talking about building aircraft carriers, but in reality we are building ships with a displacement of 5 tons for decades.


        well, Kaptsov, it seems, in his article cited many examples of the fact that, with proper funding, all projects were built at a very decent pace
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 4 December 2015 13: 36 New
          +2
          Quote: xtur
          well, Kaptsov, it seems, in his article cited many examples of the fact that, with proper funding, all projects were built at a very decent pace

          He can give any examples. Let him answer one question. When was the last time ships of the first rank were built in Russia?
          Best regards hi
          1. amba balamut 77
            amba balamut 77 4 December 2015 14: 17 New
            0
            In 2004, if I remember correctly. Two EMs. etc. hi 956EM for the Chinese Navy
          2. amba balamut 77
            amba balamut 77 4 December 2015 14: 17 New
            0
            In 2004, if I remember correctly. Two EMs. etc. hi 956EM for the Chinese Navy
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. gjv
              gjv 4 December 2015 14: 26 New
              0
              Yes, ships of the first rank are not built. Here in the ships of port support replenishment.
              KAMPO JSC [the former Orekhovo-Zuevsky design bureau of oxygen equipment, now engaged in a wide range of works, including shipbuilding] announces the implementation of the state contract for the supply of a series of multifunctional modular search and rescue boats for project 23370.

              On November 25, 2015, in Sevastopol, the state tests of the last two in a series of boats of project 23370 were completed: “SMK-2169” and “SMK-2171”. The boats became part of the Navy and will continue to serve in the 145 emergency rescue squad.
              A curious table of the distribution of these boats in their locations.
              101 SMK-1093 Lomonosov submarine work boat
              102 SMK-2094 Boat underwater technical works Sevastopol
              103 SMK-2097 Boat of rescue groups by Ломоновос
              104 SMK-2098 Boat of rescue groups by Ломоновос
              105 SMK-2100 Submarine work boat Astrakhan
              106 SMK-2102 Submarine work boat Astrakhan
              107 SMK-2103 Boat rescue teams Astrakhan
              108 SMK-2104 Boat rescue teams Astrakhan
              109 SMK-2169 Boat underwater technical works Sevastopol
              110 SMK-2170 Boat of emergency rescue teams Baltiysk
              111 SMK-2171 Boat rescue teams Sevastopol
              112 SMK-2172 Submarine work boat Baltiysk
              The boat is intended for use on inland waterways, port waters and in the coastal marine zone as a multifunctional platform - a carrier of specialized equipment and technical means. Depending on the composition of the equipment installed on the boat, it can be used for various purposes, including:
              Diving boat
              Search and rescue boat,
              Decor boat
              Physical security boat
              Fire boat
              Oil sorter boat.
          3. g1v2
            g1v2 4 December 2015 14: 28 New
            +2
            At the beginning of the 956s, destroyers 80 for the PRC. Plus a large-scale restructuring of Gorshkov into a FULL Aircraft carrier Vikramadity. Damn, you’ll break your tongue. Plus, we are building large icebreakers, which is no simpler and their displacement is no less. Just before you build, you need to have a finished project on hand. But he is not yet. What we sell abroad does not suit us, since we have other goals - confrontation with NATO. So it makes no sense to build ships of the 2019s. Now it seems that all weapons systems have already been developed, it is up to the readiness of the project. Next year they promise to lay the first udk, but I honestly doubt that this is real. Because it would mean that the project was being prepared in parallel with the purchase of the Mistral. And this may also indicate that we not only prepared in advance for the franc toss, but perhaps we ourselves wanted to throw them. In my opinion, this is not in our rules. But if nevertheless the udk is laid, then it will be cool. Well, the Leader is promised to be laid in 2023, given how much the project is being developed and that a lot has already been run in frigates, the date is quite real. There are no other new projects of ships of the first rank in state orders until XNUMX, including from the category of Wishlist.
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 4 December 2015 15: 06 New
              +1
              Quote: g1v2
              Plus, we are building large icebreakers, which is no simpler and their displacement is no less.

              Agree, building an ARC and an icebreaker is slightly different. hi About TARKs and aircraft carriers, I will not say anything.
              Quote: g1v2
              Now it seems that all weapons systems have already been developed, it is up to the readiness of the project.

              And do not remind how much we “give birth” to the Leader and Flurry project? (I'm talking about destroyers)
              1. g1v2
                g1v2 4 December 2015 18: 01 New
                0
                A flurry of it from the category of Wishlist. There is nothing about him in the state order. This project was offered at exhibitions more for export. For the leader, part of the systems is tested on Gorshkov (which is a frigate). The delay with its construction was precisely due to the fact that the armament and part of the systems were developed in parallel with the frigate. Only in summer did my GDP report. I quote.
                “It is worrying that the Severnaya Verf shipyard does not complete the tests of the head frigate of the project 22350 Admiral of the Soviet Union Gorshkov by the deadlines. The reason is the mismatch in the timing of completing the development of the Poliment-Redut, Cartun-Puma, Package and complex of automation equipment "Linkor" with the terms of the construction of the ship. "
                Now Gorshkov is already completing the tests, which means that everything is ready. AT MY LOOK THE STATED TIME OF THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE FIRST LEADER - 2019 IS REAL. hi Well, how much is it designed. Until 2013, they generally chose between two projects with different power plants. And only in 2013 they decided what we needed. request The project is complex, as it will be the main one for 20 years. And I really would not want such problems as with buzzards to arise with him.
                By the way, for the construction of ships of the first rank, some shipyards are already modernizing. Who will build the udk as a result, and who the leaders are still unclear.
                Honestly, I’m more interested in udk now and mrk 22800. In theory, next year they promised to lay both the one and the other, but there is still no clear information on the projects. request
          4. xtur
            xtur 4 December 2015 14: 32 New
            0
            the phrase that the school of building ships of the first rank was lost in Russia was based on two arguments - we were slowly building even smaller ships, and had not built ships of the first rank for a long time.

            I gave counter arguments only against the first statement. And the ability to build surface ships of the first rank can be fully appreciated by the ability to build submarines, although this is an indirect assessment.

            Boreas are built at a fairly good pace, and their displacement is approximately the same as that of the "Orlan"
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 4 December 2015 15: 20 New
              +1
              Quote: xtur
              Boreas are built at a fairly good pace, and their displacement is approximately the same as that of the "Orlan"

              "Igor Belousov" (Rescue ship) was laid down in 2005, and only now has been tested.
              Admiral Grigorovich (Patrol ship) was laid down in 2010 and has only now been tested.
              Admiral Essen of the same project was laid down in 2011 and is also now in trials
              Admiral Makarov laid in 2012 due to pass in 2016.

              About the ships of the near coastal zone! Tatarstan (1990-2003), (1991-2012!), Steregushchiy- (2001-2

              008) Savvy (20
              03-2011) and so on ... On average, we build from 7 to 13 years old! During this time, aircraft carriers build, not coastal zone ships.
              The list goes on ...
              Say the funding has let us down? So what kind of specialist will remain at the shipyard, where it’s tight with finances?
              The whole school of combat shipbuilding must be restored so that later statements about the construction of ships of the first rank do not sound like idle talk.
              Best regards hi
  12. Dimon-chik-79
    Dimon-chik-79 4 December 2015 10: 10 New
    +3
    And there is the fourth cruiser of this project (....
  13. Zomanus
    Zomanus 4 December 2015 10: 41 New
    +1
    It’s better to forget about Ukraine.
    I wonder where Ustinov will be put to serve?
    Probably at the Black Sea Fleet, with the inclusion in the Mediterranean group.
    And it’s time for Moscow to carry on a bulkhead, to update it as it should.
    Who cares, here about the "Volcano" http://bastion-karpenko.ru/vulkan-pkr/
    Although it seems to me that it would be worthwhile to switch to Onyx / Yakhont, or even to cook in Zircon.
  14. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 4 December 2015 11: 06 New
    -2
    It is necessary to upgrade to the ability to carry "Iskander M" pieces of 10 each, put in the Black Sea closer to the Bosphorus in the territorial waters of the Russian Federation, part in the Mediterranean Sea closer to the Dardanelles. I can imagine what kind of smell will come from the pydrogan
    1. amba balamut 77
      amba balamut 77 4 December 2015 11: 41 New
      +3
      Your proposal is from the same opera as the Death Star.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Yorgven
      Yorgven 4 December 2015 15: 07 New
      0
      Namely, especially since they will not impose range limitations in contrast to ground based ones.
      1. amba balamut 77
        amba balamut 77 4 December 2015 22: 18 New
        0
        Sticking a land missile into the ship’s hull is long, expensive and the result will not be necessary. For the Navy already has its own Iskander, Caliber starts. These gifts are for ships and sharpened. Remodeling, and even more so building a new cruiser under the Iskander This is too expensive. The game is not worth the candle, let them ride along the shore. And in which case, the range miraculously is likely to be increased, otherwise our designers do not know how laughing
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. amba balamut 77
    amba balamut 77 4 December 2015 11: 45 New
    0
    A couple more haggard upgrade options.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. amba balamut 77
    amba balamut 77 4 December 2015 11: 52 New
    0
    Maybe at least sisterships in addition to repairs will undergo modernization.