Military Review

Iraqi Prime Minister called any entry into Iraq of a foreign contingent without an agreement with Baghdad an act of aggression

52
Information Agency Rider reports on the negative reaction of the Iraqi authorities to the statement by the head of the Pentagon Ashton Carter about the US desire to deploy an additional contingent of US special forces on Iraqi territory. A few days ago, Carter announced that the additional forces of the American special forces would help Iraq fight the fighters DAISH (ISIS).


Iraqi Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi said that Iraq would view the deployment of a foreign contingent in the country as an act of aggression.

Iraqi Prime Minister called any entry into Iraq of a foreign contingent without an agreement with Baghdad an act of aggression


The fact is that in the Pentagon, arguing about sending troops to Iraq, apparently, they did not bother to coordinate the mission with the authorities of Iraq, thereby making it clear that they do not consider the state as an independent one. Earlier, about 50 American special forces troops were sent to Iraq, who are reportedly conducting training for Iraqi troops. Strange training, because the official Baghdad does not even know about the instructions of the Iraqi military personnel by the American military ... In this connection, the question arises: who do American military instructors teach?

Meanwhile, the Iraqi authorities demanded to discuss in the UN format the theft of oil in the country (by terrorist groups), which is then sent to Turkey.
Photos used:
www.kinoman.az
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. inkass_98
    inkass_98 4 December 2015 07: 01
    36
    Well, he said it right. The question is how these words will relate to the deed.
    1. just exp
      just exp 4 December 2015 07: 44
      +4
      and what can Moska do to an elephant? all the more knowing that the elephant is rabid, it can be crushed with a leg.
      but such statements are beneficial to us, they show who normally belongs to international law, and who wanted to sneeze at.
      1. Blondy
        Blondy 4 December 2015 08: 39
        +1
        what can pug do elephant? all the more knowing that the elephant is rabid, it can be crushed with a leg.
        Well, buy something, in Russia, for example, C300.
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 4 December 2015 10: 08
          +2
          C-300, even with very good staff, cannot be a factor of military deterrence. Lonely even a zrp (regiment) without separation, without interaction with the air force, without covering up an SD / MD air defense system - anti-radar and kr are inflicted, having died without really doing anything.

          Only the built air defense around the air defense systems (C-300 / 400) is a tough nut for any, even the most modern air invasion force.


          Pug has already done the elephant - Badr, Iraqi Kataib, Iraq’s Hazbollah, Imam Ali’s brigade, Shiite militias have declared that they will fight with the Americans as well as with DAESh, if they find themselves in their control sectors, without demand and coordination.
      2. 72jora72
        72jora72 4 December 2015 12: 12
        0
        and what can Moska do to an elephant?
        A pug can ask the bear to expand the VKS sorting area a bit, and to protect the pug’s sky with the S-400.
    2. vodolaz
      vodolaz 4 December 2015 11: 31
      0
      I look at Iraq, it's all tired too.
    3. dr.Bo
      dr.Bo 4 December 2015 11: 52
      0
      Quote: inkass_98
      Well, he said it right. The question is how these words will relate to the deed.

      It looks like a bet on Russia.
    4. Vikings
      Vikings 4 December 2015 12: 36
      0
      For starters, it would be nice to remind the Iraqis! What's in the beginning
      need to get rid of the presence of foreign troops on their
      territory! And then talk about aggression.
  2. avvg
    avvg 4 December 2015 07: 03
    +8
    The Americans are not going to observe the sovereignty of Iraq, if necessary, the Americans in Iraq will "suit" another coup.
    1. just exp
      just exp 4 December 2015 07: 45
      +2
      so ISIS is a coup.
    2. venaya
      venaya 4 December 2015 07: 55
      +2
      Quote: avvg
      Americans are not going to respect the sovereignty of Iraq

      And what sovereignty are they going to observe ??? They don't even have the "Ministry of Foreign Affairs" in stock! All questions are solved by a sharashka called "State Department". It turns out that things are inside some incomprehensible separate "sovereign"countries are the internal affair of the State Department. Hence attitude to allwho is not americos, as to your slaves, no more. Something painfully familiar to all of this, has already met.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 4 December 2015 08: 59
        0
        What a twist!
        If, in fact, Iraq refuses Amer’s troops, it will be an unexpected blow for the State Department. Even if it is introduced anyway.
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 4 December 2015 10: 15
      0
      Yes, a coup d'etat so that all the weapons that the United States handed over to Iraq go to the militants, this will essentially nullify all the attempts and bombings of our air forces and this mountain of coalition in the fight against terrorists.
  3. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 4 December 2015 07: 03
    13
    Ah, yes, smartie!
    Bravo!
    ... Just look how the rhetoric of statements by Middle Eastern leaders began to change gradually !? )))
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 4 December 2015 07: 05
    +4
    Iraq will consider the deployment of foreign troops in the country as an act of aggression

    Step in the very right direction. The only trouble is that Iraq will not ask the United States or its allies. And Iraq simply needs to report such violations loudly and without regard to the United States.
    1. Smoked
      Smoked 4 December 2015 07: 08
      +4
      Yes it doesn’t matter. The main thing is to regularly and loudly declare that certain countries commit violations of international law up to aggression. And then they hide behind a beautiful fight against terrorism, which they themselves engendered.
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 4 December 2015 10: 11
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Step in the very right direction.


      IMHO that this is not entirely true. Iraq now has practically no army of its own that could withstand the Daesh gangs. This means that if the American coalition leaves Iraq, there will be an IS caliphate instead. In addition, the Yankees are in Iraq at the request of its rulers. When the Americans withdrew some of their troops, Iraq begged the "blackest" part of the troops to leave until full-fledged Iraqi units were formed, but this has not happened until now. There are police units, but they will scatter at the first shots. In no case should we get involved in Iraqi problems. The State Department would very much like this (to shift the deed de.r.mo on our shoulders), but it seems that our leadership will not get into this trap. fool
  5. nemec55
    nemec55 4 December 2015 07: 08
    11
    Hooray !!! Finally EPT That's what I waited all week when the Iraqis themselves and the Syrians and all the others would say NO NUT So impudently declare to the Germans and the British that they are flying to bomb ISIS-MAGIL in Syria that I just got my jaw dropped as I think at the entrance yard ??? / And here, here at the courtyard there is a gate that will be closed if the owner wants it with the help of Russia good
    1. Al_oriso
      Al_oriso 4 December 2015 07: 58
      +4
      When Russia is near, everyone's backs are straightened.
  6. avva2012
    avva2012 4 December 2015 07: 11
    10
    If there is enough strength, Iraq should turn to the UN Security Council, at least. There is only one question: "Well, what is the US doing in our country. They helped, thank you very much, no more." They will never leave on their own.
    1. Mowgli
      Mowgli 4 December 2015 07: 19
      +4
      Iraq must apply to UN Security Council


      For another reason, they have already threatened to turn:

      "If the accusations against Ankara of trafficking in smuggled oil are confirmed, Iraq will immediately file a complaint with the UN Security Council and relevant international organizations," said Iraqi military official Mohammad Nasir Nuri.
      "If the Iraqi government has enough evidence and details, it will not hesitate to file a formal complaint with the UN Security Council and all competent international bodies," Nuri told Sputnik by telephone.
  7. Wolka
    Wolka 4 December 2015 07: 13
    +1
    however, the incident is obvious ...
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 4 December 2015 07: 13
    +6
    How unexpected. For mattresses, probably, less surprise was caused if the beloved Rottweiler spoke. Soon a change of leadership in Iraq?
    In striatum it is fast.
    1. sa-zz
      sa-zz 4 December 2015 08: 01
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Soon a change of leadership in Iraq?

      Definitely, this will not be the case, the first thought came up. Spent mechanism.
  9. zekaze1980
    zekaze1980 4 December 2015 07: 20
    +5
    Amerikosy are still those pigs, to arrange a coup in Iraq once to spit. And it's so nice to hear "no" in the direction of civilized tollerants.
    1. Al_oriso
      Al_oriso 4 December 2015 08: 02
      +1
      Iraqi leadership may ask for help. Only who will help them?
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 4 December 2015 10: 39
      0
      Quote: zekaze1980
      The Americans are still those pigs, they should arrange a coup in Iraq once to spit.


      Unfortunately this is the case. After all, "revolutionaries" are a nation of "exceptional" people. fellow
      IMHO, the mania of "win all" at the "blackest" developed (from the point of view of psychology) because of the inferiority syndrome in the family, where Michelle dominates, beating at times his spouse with a dog trainer or a cactus. So he tries to assert himself, taking pictures of himself, twitching with women's dumbbells, running with Biden along the corridors of the White House and sending his warriors to bomb everyone who cannot answer "perpendicularly." Well, you won't actually peel the faces of the same Biden, McCain or Clintons. But Hussein, Gaddafi and Assad are just that. At the same time, try to pinch the nasty Putin, and suddenly it works out, which means - like in the piggy bank. It does not work and will not work. bully
  10. klaus16
    klaus16 4 December 2015 07: 20
    +2
    Cho is strange. The Kurds said that it was their fuel trucks. Like they sell oil to Turkey. Iraq says they are stolen and transported to Turkey. Confused everyone. Well Iraq, okay, this state is clear. Kurdistan is not recognized at all, what did he get in? Moreover, the Kurds agreed with us. In addition, from what Americans did the specialists send the Kurds earlier?
    1. just exp
      just exp 4 December 2015 07: 45
      0
      there are Kurds for us, and there are those for Amers, but both parties are against the Turks.
      1. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 4 December 2015 08: 33
        +1
        Quote: just explo
        there are Kurds for us, and there are those for Amers, but both parties are against the Turks.

        It is interesting, colleague, but on our website a couple of times, this week, there was information that the Iraqi Kurds live quite "amicably" with the Turks, right up to joint profit from illegal oil. So let me disagree with you. There are no Kurds for us or against us. There are perhaps only Kurds "for their own interests."
        Something like a colleague thinks. hi
    2. engineer74
      engineer74 4 December 2015 08: 16
      0
      Nothing strange! These American "instructors" brought money, I think, a lot, in cash and now they have bought someone, we expect from the "representatives" of the Kurds statements that they are being bombed by the Russian Aerospace Forces!
      Well, do not teach how to fight Kurds (!) Riding mattress special forces! They went to buy them ...
    3. udincev
      udincev 4 December 2015 08: 54
      +1
      Quote: klaus16
      Cho is strange. The Kurds said that it was their fuel trucks. Like they sell oil to Turkey.

      Confession: "I'm not a good thief."
      Such confessions are simply not made.
      And whose striped ears stick out there ?!
    4. The comment was deleted.
  11. sa-ag
    sa-ag 4 December 2015 07: 27
    0
    The same situation as in Syria, if you control the territory of the country, then first you eliminate those who invaded, and then you report an act of aggression, otherwise, you just have to pay attention to yourself
  12. starwars
    starwars 4 December 2015 07: 39
    +1
    “We again insist that Iraq does not need a foreign land contingent and does not ask any country to send troops. We will consider sending (troops) an act of aggression, ”al-Abadi emphasized, commenting on the possible appearance of US special forces in Iraq. Earlier that day, Pentagon representative Steve Warren said that“ about 100 people, maybe a little smaller".

    On December 1, Pentagon chief Ashton Carter, speaking in front of the US House of Representatives Committee on Armed Forces, announced that the US would send additional special forces to Iraq to assist the Iraqi government in the fight against Islamic State terrorists. According to the Pentagon, special forces, in addition to helping Baghdad, will be able to independently carry out military operations in Syria. A source on condition of anonymity told Reuters that the number of special forces sent to Iraq will be about 200 people.

    Well, arrogant erysipelas climb without the consent of the countries of the Middle East. am
  13. avia1991
    avia1991 4 December 2015 07: 40
    +3
    in the Pentagon, arguing about sending troops to Iraq, it seems that they did not bother to coordinate the mission with the Iraqi authorities, thereby making it clear that they did not consider the state as an independent
    HA! And when did they consider Iraq independent ?!
    After the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's "bloody regime", the Americans are about the same confidence that "where will this Iraqi" province "go ?!", as Russia stayed with respect to Ukraine after the collapse of the Union.
    Meanwhile, this is clearly the influence of the operations of our air forces in Syria, and Russia's firm position: half a year ago Iraq would not have allowed such statements wink
  14. avva2012
    avva2012 4 December 2015 07: 48
    +2
    The option of our specials is possible. services. Iraq, for a long time maintained good relations with the Union (unlike Libya), there are still a sufficient number of people who studied with us. In the country, there were many of our specialists, even mixed marriages. I think the sympathies for Russia and Russians in Iraq are strong enough.
  15. Mr. Fun
    Mr. Fun 4 December 2015 07: 48
    0
    Good morning emae, finally woke up in Iraq! And then the main "dermokrats" are already ready to democratize someone, to the point of Ukraine.
    Quote: klaus16
    In addition, from what Americans did the specialists send the Kurds earlier?

    They love to send someone somewhere. Cattle cannot live without it.
    And so on the face either an attempt to imbalance the Kurds, or try to agree on something interesting, towards the mattresses, of course. As usual, pendos will promise, and then they will shrug their hands.
    All this, of course, is not casual.
  16. viktor561
    viktor561 4 December 2015 07: 54
    +1
    Quote: klaus16
    Cho is strange. The Kurds said that it was their fuel trucks.
    “Well, the Iraqi Kurds declared it!” And what did they lose to Syria - and whose fuel trucks did we and the Americans bomb in Syria ?????
  17. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 4 December 2015 08: 05
    +1
    Iraq needs to sharply raise this issue in the international arena and warn NATO of responsibility for such sorties. They don’t provide assistance, but act like scouts. Captive, negotiate extradition, destroy for resistance. Only then will NATO tighten its tail a little.
  18. PatriotKZ
    PatriotKZ 4 December 2015 08: 06
    0
    From this American special forces like water from a geese. laughing
  19. Varies
    Varies 4 December 2015 08: 45
    0
    Yes, the United States spit on every sovereignty incapable of protecting itself, that’s how it behaves like masters everywhere.
  20. Svarog5570
    Svarog5570 4 December 2015 08: 57
    0
    slowly and long reaches the Iraqis who are they for America
  21. Gray 43
    Gray 43 4 December 2015 09: 02
    0
    Iraq had to announce the sending of special forces to Ferguson, to protect civilians from police lawlessness)))
  22. GOGY
    GOGY 4 December 2015 09: 24
    +1
    Quote: klaus16
    Cho is strange. The Kurds said that it was their fuel trucks. Like they sell oil to Turkey. Iraq says they are stolen and transported to Turkey. Confused everyone. Well Iraq, okay, this state is clear. Kurdistan is not recognized at all, what did he get in? Moreover, the Kurds agreed with us. In addition, from what Americans did the specialists send the Kurds earlier?

    This is not the Kurds said. This is the Turkish source Daily Sabah printed, and to believe the enemy - do not respect yourself stop In general, very similar to nonsense negative
  23. starwars
    starwars 4 December 2015 09: 29
    +3
    The cleaning lady must be respected and honored. soldier
  24. anderles66
    anderles66 4 December 2015 09: 44
    0
    Riot on the ship? On the one hand, it is clear that especially no one will pay attention to this statement. Well, at least the USA. But. This understanding makes such a statement very valuable. I think the applicant perfectly understands who he is and what he is (in the sense - to whom he owes). In fact, we are talking about oil, which is stolen from under the nose. So with all my skepticism, I think this is a bell. If there are more of them, then, you see, something will budge.
  25. vdovinab
    vdovinab 4 December 2015 09: 46
    0
    Quote: Al_oriso
    Iraqi leadership may ask for help. Only who will help them?

    if you are not afraid of the Moscow winter and ask well. guess who will help: 0 soldier
  26. atamankko
    atamankko 4 December 2015 09: 52
    0
    Spit "minke whales" on some international standards, they are also "star".
  27. veksha50
    veksha50 4 December 2015 10: 03
    0
    "Iraqi Prime Minister called any entry into Iraq of a foreign contingent without an agreement with Baghdad an act of aggression"...

    It’s high time for Assad to make the same statement about his territory and the airspace of Syria ...
  28. Comrade Bender
    Comrade Bender 4 December 2015 10: 04
    0
    Remembering the "pike vests", I can say: Yeah, Haider al-Abadi headaaa. I wouldn't put a finger in his mouth. laughing
  29. Stoler
    Stoler 4 December 2015 11: 10
    0
    I just want to say sweetly, "Ooty-ways! And who woke up here? Who is this here swearing at daddy? Ooty-uti-ways!" laughing laughing
  30. hrenq
    hrenq 4 December 2015 12: 43
    0
    Woke up after 12 years of sleep ???
  31. Santjaga_Garka
    Santjaga_Garka 4 December 2015 17: 21
    0
    We need to supply Iraq with normal weapons, including heavy weapons and specialists, our GRU special forces are training better than Pin * Osovsky, the main thing is that there would be someone to train, as in Vietnam, then the Americans will wash themselves with blood ...