Military Review

Is Russia a gas station?

159
Today, the traditional message of the President of Russia to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation took place, where the President voiced a very important component of our economy - this is Russia's agriculture, namely last year. agricultural exports amounted to nearly 20 billion dollars. This is a quarter more than the proceeds from the sale of weapons, or about a third of the revenues from gas exports. And our agriculture made such a breakthrough in a short but fruitful period.


Is Russia a gas station?


In Russia, 40% lives in rural areas. Russia is the most gigantic country, we will soon be the largest agricultural country in the world. Russia is ashamed of being an agrarian country.

It seems dry figure voiced, but when you understand the scale of it, my eyes involuntarily rounded. This is the work of many thousands, if not millions of our villagers, who work in the fields, on farms, in processing, etc.

In many respects, at the beginning of the 90-s, Russia was on the verge of, and even in some indicators, it exceeded the level of the United States, but now such a comparison cannot be made. Agriculture has passed the biggest ravine, and stabilization in the agricultural direction of the development of the state is now visible.

Guessing on 20 years in advance, one needs to solve three problems in order to successfully feel like an independent state in terms of food: 1) food security and independence in the broad sense as an integral part of economic security and protection of the health of the nation; 2) the issue of environmental, social, political, administrative control over the territories of Russia - agriculture also performs this; 3) agriculture, rural way of life should remain the spiritual core of Russian society.

Agriculture can not be regarded as a sector of the economy. It should be considered from the point of view that this is a multifunctional activity, and, of course, we need to talk about how we need to build a policy - in a broad sense, rural development.

A. Gordeyev, Minister of Agriculture of Russia, said: “I have repeatedly spoken about the WTO, having a rather tough stance, I think that there are at least two problems: a) one problem is general political for the entire world economy, for all countries - neither the WTO nor The IMF and the World Bank do not play a useful role for developing countries and even more so for countries with economies in transition, which is Russia. This is an obvious fact, and in this context, it seems to me, the UN should form completely different institutions for managing the global economy and orgovli ".

The basic mistake is that the very foundation of the negotiations was built in this way, recognizing that there may be different standards. The WTO for Russia is a hypocritical and unjust organization. For example, there is a trade partner of the European Union, he says: "Liberalize trade, remove state support for the village, do not include protective measures." The EU population pays for products at an exorbitant rate, while everyone is silent. And when they say to us: “Just a minute, we are the WTO, and we don’t put conditions on it, you are joining it”, these things create serious prerequisites for Russian agriculture to have a serious time in the future.

Also today, Russian President Vladimir Putin has set a specific and clear goal for the near future: “I consider that the task should be set at the national level for the year 2020: a) fully provide the domestic market with domestic food. We not only can feed ourselves in view of our land, water, and most importantly, resources. Russia is capable of becoming the world's largest supplier of healthy, environmentally friendly, high-quality food products, which have long since disappeared from some Western manufacturers, all the more so since the demand for such products in the global market is steadily growing; b) you need to put into circulation millions of hectares of arable landwhich are now idle are in the hands of large landowners, and many of them are not in a hurry to engage in agriculture. ”

Vladimir Putin also stressed that we also need our own technologies for the production, storage, processing of agricultural products, our own seed and breeding stock. Extremely important task. We are still very vulnerable in these areas. I ask the leading research institutes, the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as the business, which is already successfully introducing advanced developments, to get involved in this task.

So, the goal is determined, the tasks are clear, now we need to continue the painstaking work, but taking into account past mistakes!
Author:
159 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pak_c_TonopoM
    Pak_c_TonopoM 5 December 2015 09: 49 New
    27
    Work on this has been going on for a dozen years. Only nobody sees this. Everyone wants instant happiness ...
    1. SMikhalych
      SMikhalych 5 December 2015 10: 50 New
      +8
      Quote: Pak_c_TonopoM
      Work on this has been going on for a dozen years. Only nobody sees this. Everyone wants instant happiness ...

      And work in agriculture has always been quiet and inconspicuous ... It's like your children, who grow up imperceptibly, and friends are surprised - oh, you, how your children grew up for 5-6-10 years! fellow
      Working on the land requires thoughtfulness ... above all in relation to the land itself. In my opinion, it is necessary to return again to farming technology based on non-reverse tillage (according to Ovsinsky). This will allow, if not to refuse, then significantly reduce the use of chemicals (fertilizers and herbicides) and increase natural fertility. You should be very careful when choosing seed material, namely domestic, and not stupidly buying it from the Monsanta company, which has flooded the world with its GMO seeds. The grain, accordingly, will be pulled out by livestock. And, of course, you need to forge plowshares and build infrastructure next to the swords, because the grown crop must not only be harvested, but also preserved and processed. These are common truths and THIS ... THERE ... ABOVE you need to drive it into your brain.
      1. Gunxnumx
        Gunxnumx 5 December 2015 12: 35 New
        +5
        I agree with you. I also wanted to add that although we, in Kazakhstan and in Russia, often look down on the Aul and village people, considering them dark and uncouth, namely, rural labor educates People and love for the Motherland better than any cool schools and teachers. And in the village, I believe, a healthy gene pool and the spiritual roots of our nations will always be preserved. Well, at least in Russia there are shifts in the agricultural sector, when will we do this? Oh! Sometimes it seems that everything goes to the point that all 17 million people will live in Astana and Almaty.
        1. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 5 December 2015 19: 49 New
          0
          The main thing! that they wouldn’t drink thoroughly, that everyone would have something to their liking and time for children and rest after fruitful work! And then more and more one plows, two drink, and distribute five! The latter is not only in Russia!
      2. max702
        max702 5 December 2015 12: 38 New
        0
        Quote: SMikhalych
        Grain, respectively, will pull on itself livestock. And, of course, that next to the swords you need to forge screaming and build infrastructure, because the grown crop must not only be collected, but also preserved and processed. These are common truths and THIS ... THERE ... TOP you need to drive it into your brain.

        It’s for this reason that TAM is at the very top and does not allow the CX to be engaged properly because they will become independent which is not permissible ..
      3. onix757
        onix757 5 December 2015 13: 10 New
        +1
        And work in agriculture has always been quiet and inconspicuous ...

        Unfortunately, quietly and imperceptibly, only the villages are dying out, and without them there is no one to realize these grandiose plans to restore the CX.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. alexej123
        alexej123 6 December 2015 14: 00 New
        0
        Monsanto is half the trouble. There is such a company, in Russian "Syngenta", transnational. The world leader in the production of seeds and plant protection products. On the line of GMOs as well. The company is very active everywhere, including Russia, Ukraine. He does not spare money for kickbacks. The most popular form - they organize business seminars, at their own expense, for heads of agro companies, abroad at popular resorts, expensive, in "prestigious" countries. By the way, the long-term head of Syngenta is a permanent member of the Bidelberg Club. Like this.
    2. Hardy
      Hardy 5 December 2015 11: 39 New
      +3
      Quote: Pak_c_TonopoM
      Work on this has been going on for a dozen years. Only nobody sees this. Everyone wants instant happiness ...

      Happiness is not in money, but in their quantity))) So, "happiness" in the modern economy is received only by the producer of money, not goods.
      If they allow us and give money for a significant increase in agricultural production, then they will definitely lower prices for it)))) How much you don’t work, you still owe it to world bankers ...
    3. g1v2
      g1v2 5 December 2015 16: 12 New
      +1
      The Food Security Strategy was adopted in 2010. Then the work began. Does everyone remember the Bush legs in Soviet times? Purchasing Canadian wheat for petrodollars at the same time? Now we provide ourselves with cereals and poultry and export them abroad. Meat production has risen not bad, most of the fish in stores is Russian. So far, problems with ground vegetables and fruits. Well, we are unlikely to provide ourselves with bananas, but orchards in the Caucasus are being laid this and last year. With vegetables, the ban on Turkish vegetables should help, plus for these 2 years in Russia a lot of greenhouse farms have been laid. By 2020, I think that we will close the issue on vegetables. Another thing is that 100 percent will still not be - allies need to provide part of the market. They are with us, not because we are so good friends, but because it is profitable. Tch Belarusian potatoes, Azerbaijani tomatoes, etc. will not disappear. Well, let's not engage in cap-making. We still buy a lot of food. This year’s statistics - for 8 months we exported food worth $ 11,5 billion, and imported $ 19 billion. So, until 2020, there is still a lot of work and there is still something to replace.
      1. Andriuha077
        Andriuha077 5 December 2015 18: 44 New
        +3
        Picture in title:
        Rostselmash - Russian company, one of the five largest world producers of agricultural equipment. As part of 13 enterprises. Production sites in countries: Canada, Russia, USA, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.
        Rostselmash is considered the official birthday of 21 July 1929. On this day, long before the end of construction, the first 5 workshops were launched, and the first products were released.
        The strategic owner of the company is the company "New Commonwealth" (founders and managing partners - Babkin Konstantin Anatolyevich, ..
        YouTube video: Babkin Konstantin Anatolyevich, a report at the Constituent Congress of the All-Russian Political Party "PARTY OF BUSINESS". October 14 2010, Moscow, Izmailovo Concert Complex.
        The path to a coup d'etat lies through the WTO ?. Chairman of the Editorial Board of FORUM.msk Mikhail Delyagin talks with Konstantin Babkin
        "The spirit of the Russian people is not broken."
        Accession to the WTO: "no production - no country"

        “You said that in an interview with Putin, you explained to him what is being done wrong in our country and what should be done for the successful development of production.” So it's still wrong?

        - What's wrong? On the whole, the whole liberal policy, which is associated with such names as Chubais, Kudrin, Gref. She brought our great country to a standstill, put us all on the verge of a genuine industrial catastrophe. It is because of the social and political consequences of this not even destructive, but simply murderous policy that such a movement appeared on the streets. If people worked, were busy, quietly and massively earned decent money - there would be no protests.

        After all, what is the meaning of liberal economic policy? Sucking money out of people, like blood - as much as possible and as efficiently as possible - take them abroad, put them in foreign banks ... and for the sake of this, strangle everything living with taxes, maximize the cost of products with the help of tax policy. And with the help of customs policy and advertised accession to the WTO, it is possible to open the market as much as possible in order to put Russian producers in unequal conditions of competition in comparison with foreign ones.
        Written to Putin a letter "Why the tractor factory will remain in Canada" Konstantin Babkin transfers production to Russia
      2. Oleko
        Oleko 6 December 2015 03: 28 New
        0
        Quote: g1v2

        g1v2


        Yesterday, 16: 12

        ↑ ↓


        The Food Security Strategy was adopted in 2010. Then the work began. Does everyone remember the Bush legs in Soviet times? Purchasing Canadian wheat for petrodollars at the same time? Now we provide ourselves with cereals and poultry and export them abroad. Meat production has risen not bad, most of the fish in stores is Russian. So far, problems with ground vegetables and fruits. Well, we are unlikely to provide ourselves with bananas, but orchards in the Caucasus are being laid this and last year. With vegetables, the ban on Turkish vegetables should help, plus for these 2 years in Russia a lot of greenhouse farms have been laid. By 2020, I think that we will close the issue on vegetables. Another thing is that 100 percent will still not be - allies need to provide part of the market. They are with us, not because we are so good friends, but because it is profitable. Tch Belarusian potatoes, Azerbaijani tomatoes, etc. will not disappear. Well, let's not engage in cap-making. We still buy a lot of food. This year’s statistics - for 8 months we exported food worth $ 11,5 billion, and imported $ 19 billion. So, until 2020, there is still a lot of work and there is still something to replace.

        Smart comment plus is not a hindrance.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 5 December 2015 09: 59 New
      +1
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Let Putin do something ... The people have patience is not endless!

      We have interesting people. In the regional elections, the people, in most constituent entities of the federation, voted for Medvedev's party (United Russia), and now he is waiting for Putin to cope with this - will he be able to break the horns of the bourgeois government or not ... Shiz.

      ps
      Next year, elections to the Duma, and I know that most of the seats in it will be from EP since the votes will be those whom we chose yesterday ...
      1. The black
        The black 5 December 2015 10: 09 New
        +9
        In general, in the same elections, Putin himself supported the EP .... or is it not? wink
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 5 December 2015 10: 15 New
          -6
          Quote: Black
          Actually, in the same elections, Putin himself supported the EP .... or is it not?

          I have not heard - throw off the link. Putin has a Popular Front. Why would he support a competitor?
          1. The black
            The black 5 December 2015 10: 18 New
            12
            I have not heard about the Popular Front party registered in the Russian Federation smileBy the way, do not remind who the CHAIRMAN of the EP party was before Medvedev? winkAnd from which party was the candidate for President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin nominated in 2012? wink
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 5 December 2015 10: 22 New
              -8
              Quote: Black
              I have not heard of the Popular Front party registered in the Russian Federation.

              Power is not a signboard in an office, but a practical ability to manage processes in society.
              It is not a party either, but it is with the NF that Putin won the last presidential election, and it is the NF that is fighting the United Russia "locally".
              1. The black
                The black 5 December 2015 10: 31 New
                +2
                Boris, so still from which party did Vladimir Putin nominate for the 2012 presidential election? ... or is he self-nominated, an independent candidate? wink
                1. Boris55
                  Boris55 5 December 2015 10: 49 New
                  -3
                  Quote: Black
                  Boris, so still from which party did Vladimir Putin nominate for the 2012 presidential election? ... or is he self-nominated, an independent candidate?

                  In order not to be unfounded - in this video you will probably find the answer, at the very beginning ~ 0-15 sec .:

                  1. The black
                    The black 5 December 2015 11: 32 New
                    +4
                    Boris, in my opinion they already explained here to you that in fact
                    Quote: onix757
                    The Popular Front is the same ep under a different guise.
                    Look carefully at the leadership of the NF. Who, along with VV Putin, is the co-chair? That's right S. Govorukhin. - deputy of the State Duma. From which party is he a deputy? That's right - from UNITED RUSSIA .. smile .And let's close the argument ... especially since it’s not quite as if in topic ...
                    1. Boris55
                      Boris55 5 December 2015 13: 45 New
                      -1
                      Quote: Black
                      And let's close the argument ... especially since it’s not quite as if in a topic ...

                      I agree. We are far from the given topic and yet. I got the impression that in your concept a party is something monolithic, such as the CPSU, but if you remember how the EP was created, it turns out that it was formed of three parties ... Okay, this is not about that. hi
              2. Hardy
                Hardy 5 December 2015 11: 48 New
                +2
                Quote: Boris55
                Power is not a signboard in an office, but a practical ability to manage processes in society.
                It is not a party either, but it is with the NF that Putin won the last presidential election, and it is the NF that is fighting the United Russia "locally".

                From the animal world ...
                "Shepherds consider the shepherd a genius, a dog as a protector, a goat as a leader, although the owner and the dog eat more sheep than wolves, but the ozel leads them to the slaughter!"
          2. onix757
            onix757 5 December 2015 10: 22 New
            +3
            The Popular Front is the same ep under a different guise. In other words, a bunch of hangers-on and budget eaters.
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 5 December 2015 10: 29 New
              -1
              Quote: onix757
              The Popular Front is the same ep under a different guise. In other words, a bunch of hangers-on and budget eaters.

              I understand that there will be no references to Putin allegedly supporting the EP in the elections?
              Can you tell me who finances the NF and how?
              1. The black
                The black 5 December 2015 10: 44 New
                +2
                Why not? Look in PM wink
              2. onix757
                onix757 5 December 2015 10: 45 New
                +1
                I understand that there will be no references to Putin allegedly supporting the EP in the elections?

                EP is his brainchild, which is the core of ONF and while he needs to push through the Duma the necessary laws until EP will "run the show" with Putin's tacit support. The presidential administration and the governors flow from the ruling elite of the EP, for special merits, so to speak.
                Can you tell me who finances the NF and how?

                The regional branches of the PF are now in "hibernation", they will revive for the elections on the 18th. Funded from the AP.
                1. Boris55
                  Boris55 5 December 2015 11: 21 New
                  -2
                  Quote: onix757
                  The regional branches of the PF are now in "hibernation", they will revive for the elections on the 18th.

                  Good hibernation. Everyone would have slept like that ... Do not tell me, thanks to the activities of the ONF, how many governors were removed?
                  1. onix757
                    onix757 5 December 2015 11: 32 New
                    +1
                    Good hibernation. Everyone would have slept like that ..

                    Of course it's good. You try to contact your regional office and get some kind of intelligible answer.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 5 December 2015 10: 25 New
          0
          Quote: MIKHAN
          It's time to "clean" Mother Russia again ... (there are many fat bugs on it)

          Until the idea has mastered the masses - it is dead
          How can one cleanse it of the bourgeois when the people vote for the bourgeois?
          1. MIKHAN
            MIKHAN 5 December 2015 10: 34 New
            +1
            Quote: Boris55
            Quote: MIKHAN
            It's time to "clean" Mother Russia again ... (there are many fat bugs on it)

            Until the idea has mastered the masses - it is dead
            How can one cleanse it of the bourgeois when the people vote for the bourgeois?

            The Jewish question .. And who would you vote for? bully Naturally do not answer ..))))
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 5 December 2015 10: 38 New
              +2
              Quote: MIKHAN
              The Jewish question .. And who would you vote for? bully Naturally do not answer ..))))

              The meaning of secret voting is the possibility of manipulating the results of voting.
              Naturally I will answer. I voted in the presidential - for Putin, and in the parliament - for the Communists.
              1. MIKHAN
                MIKHAN 5 December 2015 10: 45 New
                +1
                Quote: Boris55
                Quote: MIKHAN
                The Jewish question .. And who would you vote for? bully Naturally do not answer ..))))

                The meaning of secret voting is the possibility of manipulating the results of voting.
                Naturally I will answer. I voted in the presidential - for Putin, and in the parliament - for the Communists.

                Got it! I always do the same thing! hi Our person.. good Sorry, but all sorts of thoughts went to your account .. laughing
              2. Azitral
                Azitral 5 December 2015 11: 46 New
                -1
                For the communists? This is for those who miscalculated the USSR? I understand that they were unbeaten, irremovable and insolent worse than the current EP. But here I have not heard anything sane. Cheap populism, recipes from a disastrous past and appeal to those who uncritically nostalgic for Soviet times. Come back, with your prayers, those times, your children will react very, very badly to this. No need to restore the USSR! It is necessary to do not only new, but also on new foundations. And - without private property, even large, can not do. Maybe unfortunately for someone.
                1. MIKHAN
                  MIKHAN 5 December 2015 12: 04 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Azitral
                  For the communists? This is for those who miscalculated the USSR? I understand that they were unbeaten, irremovable and insolent worse than the current EP. But here I have not heard anything sane. Cheap populism, recipes from a disastrous past and appeal to those who uncritically nostalgic for Soviet times. Come back, with your prayers, those times, your children will react very, very badly to this. No need to restore the USSR! It is necessary to do not only new, but also on new foundations. And - without private property, even large, can not do. Maybe unfortunately for someone.

                  Lai is counted ..! In the 90s I heard this in the media ... But Russia is still returning to its way of life! Those who don’t like it run away with bags of stolen money west and we don’t keep them! hi (then we will take the money ..)))
                2. onix757
                  onix757 5 December 2015 12: 43 New
                  +3
                  and the communists? This is for those who miscarried the USSR?

                  No, for those Communists who in 90 did not betray the oath and did not work for traitors like the dog.
                  I understand that they were unbeaten, irremovable and insolent worse than the current EP.

                  There were very few of them, since ideology did not allow satisfying all Wishlist thieves. Today the smallest bureaucrat will give odds in arrogance and theft
                  to any secretary of the regional committee.
                  Cheap populism, recipes from a disastrous past and appeal to those who uncritically nostalgic for Soviet times. Come back, with your prayers, those times, your children will react very, very badly to this.

                  Broadcast cheap populism from the rostrum about getting off the knees for 15 years. Meanwhile, the state has already donated our children with money as potential milk cows.
          2. onix757
            onix757 5 December 2015 10: 55 New
            +1
            How can one cleanse it of the bourgeois when the people vote for the bourgeois?

            For a long time no one believes in the objectivity of elections. Irkutsk region has clearly shown this. In EP, for a long time already, one of the success achievements in the elections has been the low turnout criterion, for which they are fighting hard.
        2. onix757
          onix757 5 December 2015 10: 50 New
          +2
          .Russia is tired of "liberal balabls"

          I agree, it remains to clarify which of the liberals is the most dangerous. Those in power or those in the swamp. For some reason, it seems to me that the first.
          1. MIKHAN
            MIKHAN 5 December 2015 10: 57 New
            +1
            Quote: onix757
            .Russia is tired of "liberal balabls"

            I agree, it remains to clarify which of the liberals is the most dangerous. Those in power or those in the swamp. For some reason, it seems to me that the first.

            Redhead sits quietly in power and no one touches him ... Tricky bastard! Waiting ...
            1. asiat_61
              asiat_61 5 December 2015 23: 32 New
              +1
              Ginger on the board of directors of a bank of amersky and some office, I don’t remember their names.
      3. Karabin
        Karabin 5 December 2015 10: 37 New
        +3
        Quote: Boris55
        We have interesting people

        Highly. Especially when Putin separates from EdRa.
      4. go21zd45few
        go21zd45few 5 December 2015 10: 50 New
        0
        In order to say who voted for what you need to know the elected kitchen. First, you need to know the percentage of voters of the total number of voters.
        I will give an example of a polling station out of 1500 voters voted 270
        which is 20% of the total number, people don’t go to vote as they don’t believe the authorities, the administrative resource played a small role. If violations are detected, the prosecutor’s office is inactive, and here’s the election.
      5. max702
        max702 5 December 2015 12: 48 New
        +2
        Throw raving about PARTIES as they are called does not matter the slightest! All the same, they are managed by one center .. And all claims on voting are absolutely groundless. When there was a point AGAINST ALL then (honestly consider the results) the way to express your attitude to what was happening was at least small but WAS! And now we are offered to choose some kind of shit, but the result will not change .. Shit will still be shit!
    2. zahoder
      zahoder 5 December 2015 10: 20 New
      -3
      Well, to what end, faith in Putin is endless. "Let Putin do something" And he needs to do something. Just remember where he came from, in 1999. And what were the conditions of his presidency: the interests of the family (not to touch relatives). interests of big business. Continue.
    3. go21zd45few
      go21zd45few 5 December 2015 10: 39 New
      +1
      Meehan, hope for God, but don’t be fooled by yourself. Why Putin is to blame for everything, and where is our mediocre government headed by Medvedev, why are we suffering
      mediocre non-professional thought, water does not flow under a lying stone. Therefore, we,
      people, do not criticize, but Putin needs help. Remember from what swamp he pulls out Russia after the EBN gang. But the difficulties we survive and experienced not so.
      1. onix757
        onix757 5 December 2015 10: 52 New
        +2
        Why Putin is to blame for everything, and where is our mediocre government headed by Medvedev, why are we suffering

        Apparently because he claimed this government, which by the way is fighting for the implementation of the May decrees. The truth is not very successful, but it does not bother him.
      2. zahoder
        zahoder 5 December 2015 11: 06 New
        -2
        Yes, he pulls out, and the disadvantages from the EBN gang interfere with him and cynically laugh at his hard work. And if you recall Sobchak, it turns out that Putin somehow touched the EBN.
      3. 2s5giacints
        2s5giacints 5 December 2015 12: 21 New
        +2
        gang ebn both sat in government and sits
  3. Wedmak
    Wedmak 5 December 2015 09: 56 New
    0
    Someone would have thought that Russian agricultural and milling equipment is supplied to Germany and a number of EU countries. So we can? SchA still the auto industry will catch up, in general there will be a "bomb".
    1. onix757
      onix757 5 December 2015 10: 24 New
      +3
      Will not be. The share of domestic components in "Russian technology" is extremely low.
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 5 December 2015 10: 04 New
      0
      Quote: polite people
      The central bank destroys Russia.


      accordion
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 5 December 2015 10: 54 New
      0
      Quote: polite people
      Central Bank ...

      What for this whiner for the hundredth time to post?

      What yourself - nothing to say? It’s like that .. But if it’s so - what the hell .. stick out ??

      Ugh .. yes
    3. WINovikov
      WINovikov 5 December 2015 11: 18 New
      +1
      That would be the "guarantor" and deal with the Central Bank and the Exchange. Instead of Siberian Cranes, Tigers and Leopards. But ... the "guarantor" has no time. Busy.
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 5 December 2015 11: 24 New
        +1
        Quote: WINovikov
        That would be the "guarantor" and deal with the Central Bank and the Exchange

        How do you know what is no longer "engaged"? Economist? Politician? Do you have information?

        Well, no! Where ??

        Here you are divorced .. we don’t know anything and don’t want to know, only in the comments .. we stink, I'm sorry .. knowing for sure that at the present time there’s nothing for it ..

        Ugh again (I’m kind in the morning ... I need to fix this urgently laughing )
    4. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 December 2015 13: 18 New
      +1
      And the fact that now the Central Bank transfers 90% of its annual profit to the state budget is also the destruction of Russia.
      1. asiat_61
        asiat_61 5 December 2015 23: 38 New
        +1
        Question: what is the task of the Central Bank? The Constitution is not written for the Central Bank? Violation of the Constitution by the Prosecutor's Office does not raise questions?
  5. The black
    The black 5 December 2015 09: 58 New
    +2
    I hope the GDP understands that the greatest threat to Russia is not external enemies, but internal ones. Only after putting order in the power structures is it possible to develop the domestic market, agriculture, industry, etc. The fact that the President actually said this in his message gives a chance that it will be so.
    1. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 5 December 2015 10: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: Black
      I hope the GDP understands that the greatest threat to Russia is not external enemies, but internal ones.


      Does he not know?

      Quote: Black
      Only after putting order in the power structures is it possible to develop the domestic market, agriculture, industry, etc.


      really? yes will give him? don’t be naive, the liberals are still strong, you just need to change the constitution, the Central Bank under the state and the powers of the president in the republic, then it will start. In the meantime, the president can only change ministers and give instructions, but they may not fulfill it.
      1. The black
        The black 5 December 2015 10: 15 New
        +2
        How are you going to change the constitution if the "liberals are strong" wink Or is it not liberals in the State Duma and it’s not a problem to change the constitution? smile Or do you think that the President of the Russian Federation has little authority?
    2. Karabin
      Karabin 5 December 2015 10: 39 New
      +4
      Quote: Black
      I hope the GDP understands that the greatest threat to Russia is not external enemies, but internal ones.

      In my opinion, the greatest threat is the friends of GDP. Serdyukov, Chubais, Skrynnik and further down the list.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. WINovikov
      WINovikov 5 December 2015 11: 20 New
      +1
      Not a damn thing will change. The guarantor "actually said" ... If he did.
  6. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 5 December 2015 10: 04 New
    +2
    The fact that Russia can become the largest food supplier is absolutely true. You just need to collect a handful of rolls and make an effort. And as for the gas station, the United States is a poor country, and they openly envy us of this. Otherwise, why destroy the Middle East and stretch it for oil lip to Siberia! Eggplant them on the collar!
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 December 2015 10: 06 New
    +5
    Agriculture is really actively developing, and the fact that food is more and more exported is good, not bad. This is not a sale of raw materials. The United States exports a huge amount of food - but this country is not called raw!
  8. Haettenschweiler
    Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 10 New
    -4
    - The article does not deserve a kind word. The full impression that the author is an enthusiastic id ... from, delighted with another sad speech of the president. And he draws conclusions based not on facts, but on ... the words of the president. Which is the same village, for the last time, probably, I saw forty years ago with my own eyes. An extreme case - they built for him another "Potemkin village" and he will forever remember how wonderful life is in a Russian village. So, for the most "outstanding" points in the article:

    agricultural exports amounted to nearly 20 billion dollars.


    - If you don’t think, where the products are gone, and how products were imported, the figure is impressive, no doubt.

    And our agriculture made such a breakthrough in a short but fruitful period.


    - Under the leadership of the wisest leader of our people! Cheers cheers! Ugh, damn it, these stamps are already eating out your eyes. They also said that they would deviate from the style of the Pravda newspaper ...

    In Russia, 40% live in rural areas.


    Here is a good article about the urban and rural population of Russia.
    http://www.grandars.ru/shkola/geografiya/gorodskoe-naselenie-rossii.html
    The author, apparently, is sure that if a person lives in a village, then he automatically grows grain or meat and dairy cattle. But this is the same nonsense as to consider that everyone living in the area with the name of Metallurgists, for example, is engaged in the smelting of metals.
    In reality, in modern Russia only 55% of the rural population is engaged in agriculture, the remaining 45% work in industry, transport, non-production sphere and other "urban" sectors of the economy.


    Russia is the largest country, we will soon be the largest agricultural country in the world. Russia is ashamed of being an agrarian country.


    - The "largest" country, firstly, because the "most gigantic" is an indicator of the author's low culture of speech. Or did someone run a comparative competition among the giant countries on Earth? Regarding "we will ..." - Wang is missing without the author. Someone predicts a rapid decay, someone - a technological heyday, and so on. And Russia is not ashamed of anything. Because it was an agrarian country under the kings. It was not agrarian under the Soviets. Under the Democrats, there is nothing at all, except perhaps selling raw materials.
    1. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 11 New
      +1
      Agriculture has passed the biggest ravine, and now stabilization in the agricultural direction of the development of the state is visible.


      - I don’t know how it is with the "gully", but stabilization is yes. The Russian village has already rotted on the vine, and an ever larger part of the agricultural sector is occupied by agro-industrial holdings and "Varangians" - the same Chinese in the Far East. So the government consistently lays down a bolt with a fine thread for the needs of the peasants and intends to do the same in the future. It's true.

      Making 20 Years Ahead


      - To guess who will be? Lyulyukaevs with Naebulin and other Siluanovs? They are, yes, they’ll guess ... they haven’t yet demonstrated all their professionalism, give them a chance to delay ... something else. Or will the president personally guess on a cup of morning coffee?

      Agriculture cannot be regarded as a sector of the economy.


      - Then why the hell do you need it?

      Minister of Agriculture of Russia A. Gordeev


      - At which the villagers did not receive, do not receive and will not receive anything for their hard labor, except for copecks, which Caucasians will pay at the food bases for wholesale purchase? Yes, an authoritative man, what’s there.

      The WTO for Russia is an organization hypocritical and unfair.


      - And again, this cliched nonsense. The officials of all Russia were eager for this WTO, as if possessed, and even now, when this WTO begins to gradually bend Russia more and more, they are in no hurry to get out of it. So for what Russia is it hypocritical and other nonsense there?

      Also today, Russian President Vladimir Putin has set a fairly specific and clear goal for the near future.


      - He can put anything and anywhere. His word is dust and costs nothing. Even the tiny, ruined, insignificant Ukraine threw him $ 3 billion. It would be foolish to seriously think that the state apparatus would suddenly become subject to it and take up the mind. In all domestic areas of politics - a complete failure. And the president is doing ... nothing. He can do nothing about it. Is that to send a couple of attack aircraft also to Iraq. Why not?

      So, the goal is determined, the tasks are clear, now we need to continue the painstaking work, but taking into account past mistakes!


      - Who needs to continue the painstaking work? Is the author generally aware of the meaning of the word "painstaking"? Or stamps - stamps and all that? Regarding work - Dima-iPhone fell asleep already on the President's "message". I think the other officials are in solidarity with him.
      1. kostya-petrov
        5 December 2015 10: 17 New
        +7
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        Which the same village, for the last time, probably, saw forty years ago with his own eyes.

        I’ll tell you more, I work in agriculture. A veterinarian by training himself, now still in graduate school, is my dissertation on the topic of cattle reproduction.
        If you think that I only wanted to state the fact of the rise of the agro-industrial complex, it exists, but there are still many unsolved problems. And no one hides them.
        Now a lot of NEW dairy, pig and poultry complexes are being built. Want to know, the site "Made by us" will help you.
        They publish only what is already open, built in Russia.
        I don’t wear pink glasses.
        1. Haettenschweiler
          Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 20 New
          -4
          Quote: kostya-petrov
          If you think that I only wanted to state the fact of the rise of the agro-industrial complex


          - I think you are wishful thinking. There is no "fact" of "rise" in sight.

          Quote: kostya-petrov
          Now a lot of NEW dairy, pig and poultry complexes are being built. Want to know, the site "Made by us" will help you.


          - Thank you, I will look with interest. And, most importantly, with even greater interest I will see how many of them will be actually built. My opinion is this: the new topic set by the president will become an excellent new feeding trough for the official bribe, and under this subject - construction, development, etc., huge amounts of money will float away.
          1. kostya-petrov
            5 December 2015 10: 26 New
            10
            Quote: Haettenschweiler
            I think you are wishful thinking. There is no "fact" of "rise" in sight.

            pig production - export
            in poultry farming - export
            grain - export.
            You look how much Russia has increased the number of pigs, poultry.
            Yes, we have problems with dairy and beef cattle breeding.

            In Russia, we import cattle in large quantities, yes, this is important - the accumulation of genetic milk potential for the country.
            A cow with high milk yield lives 3-4, a maximum of 5 lactations, then it is waiting for it, either natural death, or it goes under the knife (according to some veterinary or zootechnical indications). Such a cow (Holstein-Friesian) either works for milk or for itself (accumulates fat deposits). It is important to always have time to get a calf from a cow per year, which means that a cow must have time to wedge into its physiological cycle (a pregnant cow walks 311 days (on average), a cow is kept dry for 60 days, and the service period for this cow is on average 90 days), so consider that we can’t do without hormonal treatment of cows (sex cycle synchronization schemes - “Pressing”, “Ovsing”, “Cosing”), not forgetting that this cow (Holstein) has such milk productivity dominates the milk dominant, but in no way e sexual. So it turns out that everyone screams about hormones in milk and meat, but at the same time, everyone wants “more and more”, and few people think about how this is all realized. If the cow is not covered on time, and in order for it to give a lot of milk, special feeding schemes are developed, then it then goes “to fat” - in the literal sense of the word, and then losing that fat weight is very difficult. Hence, later problems with the reproductive tract arise - uterine obesity, uterine hypotension, ovarian hypofunction, etc., then it is very difficult to get a calf from such a cow.

            To provide our population with milk, for this we need a production reserve from young animals, from a good forage base and production sites for working with young animals.
            If we take into account that the rejection percentage is approximately 5%, then the bias should be done specifically for forcing the livestock.

            In dairy farming, everything is quite complicated - we are forced to raise heifers up to the age of 2 years, then later to inseminate it, and after 9 months to get a calf from her and start milking the cow. During this time, we will be able to get two offspring cycles in pig breeding (gestation of sows 3 of the month 3 of the week and 3 of the day), we will be able to increase the number of livestock on the bird, feed it and send it for slaughter.
            For a cow - if we are unable to inseminate the cow on time, the period of the breeding season is extended (the period from calving to fruitful insemination), the cow can then be safely transferred to the category of summer ones, and if after 5 - 6 months we don’t get pregnant at all, then the cow remains barren the next year.
            Now we will translate all of the above into fodder days - it turns out that we have to feed a cow 2 once a day (sometimes 3) - a cow eats up to 18 kilograms of hay per day, drinks 100 liters of water and consumes 3 liters of concentrates. If we do not get a calf, and later milk, then why do we need such a cow - not profitability! Since we must receive a calf from a cow every year (without a calf there is no certainty about a future successful herd). Yes, and the replacement in the herd must be kept constantly - so to speak, its updating.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. kostya-petrov
                5 December 2015 10: 51 New
                +1
                Quote: Haettenschweiler
                That is, we import much more items than we export

                you take into account the fact that now sanctions, and many goods fell under the ban on imports into Russia.
                The country cannot produce everything at home, the same bananas do not grow with us, oranges, etc.
                Look at that normally. And what's wrong with the fact that we buy some parts of the goods abroad?

                Quote: Haettenschweiler
                beef, pork and a little chicken;

                we drive pork for export, similarly for poultry. We have no reason to import it.
            2. Haettenschweiler
              Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 54 New
              0
              Quote: kostya-petrov
              You look how much Russia has increased the number of pigs, poultry.
              Yes, we have problems with dairy and beef cattle breeding.


              - Problems will most likely start in the same way with a pig and a bird. The fact is that the agro-industrial complex is tightly tied to "adjacent" industries - for example, without good mineral fertilizers there will be no good harvests, especially in Central Russia, where the climate, frankly speaking, is not a resort climate and the land is not the most abundant. The same problem with animals and birds - hormones, food and other related gizmos, of which I have the faintest idea. Despite the doctrine of "import substitution" raised on the shield, nothing really has even begun to this day. Thus, most of all these useful things come to us from abroad. Which can block the flow at any time. By the way, about the animals - I'll digress a little - I don't know how many heads they bring to Russia in a "live" form. But, probably, very little, if on the shelves - cut meat produced in Latin America or there, "Bush's legs". And this situation has persisted for many years. So, the main idea is: even if the state suddenly scratches its bottom and helps the agro-industrial complex to raise farmland, a new batch of sanctions will throw it back a lot. And all this is due to the inability and unwillingness of the sovereign's husbands to work. And the "sovereign" himself is not very much involved in domestic politics, he is playing war in the East. So, if a "bright future" does come, then only for large associations and holdings, the peasants will drink too much and die out in the same way. There can be no question of any "village". There are no loans available to the peasants and there will never be, there are no guarantees of redemption of the harvest, and there will be no guarantees, and with such risks to engage in private farming - who will?
              1. kostya-petrov
                5 December 2015 11: 01 New
                +1
                Quote: Haettenschweiler
                But, probably, very little, if on the shelves - cut meat produced in Latin America or there, "Bush's legs".

                Is this the last time you saw Bush's legs?
                in 90? I agree. But now they are not! Do not be fooled by yourself.

                Quote: Haettenschweiler
                The fact is that the agro-industrial complex is tightly tied to "adjacent" industries - for example, without good mineral fertilizers there will be no good harvests, especially in Central Russia, where the climate, frankly speaking, is not a resort climate and the land is not the most abundant.

                and we are talking about this, when there will be good yields, offspring, etc. then agriculture will go up.
                Regarding the climate, if you are so pessimistic, do you propose that you don’t sow anything and clean anything in areas of risky farming and animal husbandry in Russia?
      2. Beard31
        Beard31 5 December 2015 10: 47 New
        -1
        He said everything correctly, in a country of devastation and systemic incapacity, the results of government activity are pushing the country to rebellion.
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 6 December 2015 04: 09 New
      +1
      Quote: Haettenschweiler
      The article does not deserve a kind word. The complete impression that the author is an enthusiastic id ... from, admired by the president’s dismal speech

      Here is how it happens sometimes - I decided to make a fool of myself, but I ran into a person who understands the issue ..

      kostya-petrov I ate you without salt.

      And rightly so, IMHO.
      1. Haettenschweiler
        Haettenschweiler 7 December 2015 14: 18 New
        0
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        kostya-petrov ate you without salt.


        - I don’t agree about "being clever" - I am, in principle, the smartest person on the planet! As for the rest, yes, they ate me, and, although the thought does not leave me that the conversation has gone strongly to the side, on the field where I am not capable of fighting, but the fact remains. They put it on the shoulder blades.
  9. kursk87
    kursk87 5 December 2015 10: 12 New
    +4
    Food security is the foundation of a country's well-being. In the 90s, the followers of liberal democracy convinced the people that Western products are cheaper and of better quality, that it is necessary to buy Western products. These actions brought to the knees of domestic agricultural producers. Now the ruling circles have come to their senses and began to understand how important their domestic production is. But tremendous work needs to be done to restore the domestic agricultural sector, which will reduce dependence on foreign producers
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 5 December 2015 11: 15 New
      0
      Quote: kursk87
      security is the foundation ... the followers of liberal democracy convinced ... they brought domestic farmers to their knees ... they came to their senses and began ... tremendous work to restore ... dependence on foreign producers

      Blah blah blah...

      Or did you say something new and interesting? Emphasize if Mona - well, it doesn’t come to ..
  10. Sasha75
    Sasha75 5 December 2015 10: 14 New
    +3
    He talked about five years ago with a German, he was very interested in our ecological production of agricultural products. And I was surprised by some of his words, it turns out that our products are the cleanest in Europe and have long been traded for our grain as environmentally friendly and don’t buy American GMOs and fertilizers. Everybody in the east from the Emirates to Turkey buys our grain. them about GMOs and potency + children's health. And what is the whole secret in Europe per hectare of mineral fertilizers 330-350kg we have 27-29 kg as you the difference. And yet we have the cleanest land, even during the Soviet Union they made a mess of it for 25 years, almost everything was cleaned up; our money simply didn’t buy fertilizers in such quantities, and our products can now take a very interesting revenge on premium environmentally friendly products.
    1. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 17 New
      -4
      Quote: Sasha75
      And I was surprised by some of his words, it turns out that our products are the cleanest in Europe and have long been traded for our grain as environmentally friendly.


      - Lies from word to word. And about the German, and about the products. Alas.
      1. kostya-petrov
        5 December 2015 10: 19 New
        +1
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        Lies from word to word. And about the German, and about the products. Alas.

        your facts to the studio!
        1. Haettenschweiler
          Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 22 New
          0
          Quote: kostya-petrov
          your facts to the studio!


          - It's very simple: show me a European auction where Russian grain is traded and fierce battles are going on for it. Note, I am merciful and do not even demand the same auctions "from the Emirates to Turkey", even if only in Europe.
      2. kostya-petrov
        5 December 2015 10: 30 New
        +5
        In the production of poultry meat, we have already exceeded the entire USSR by 1.4 times (in the 1985 year in all the Union republics 2.8 million tons of poultry meat were produced together), and the RSFSR bypassed 2.2 times.

        If you look at the production of poultry meat per capita in the USSR now, the growth is even greater:
        1965 - 3.1 kg
        1973 - 5.1 kg
        1985 - 10.2 kg
        1999 - 5.0 kg
        2012 - 25.3 kg
        2013 - 26.8 kg
        2014 * - 28.1 kg

        Chicken production (for domestic consumption) can already be considered as an accomplished project. The next in line is the production of ducks, turkeys, quails and, quite already, exotic ostriches, etc. It is at the expense of these breeds that we increase and diversify the diet.

        From one pig per year, you can get a dozen commercial pigs (and 10 − 20 piglets and gilts) or five future sows (and five boars for sausage).

        On average, one heifer (and one goby for roast beef) is born from two cows per year, which will give offspring in two years.

        In other words, the productive number of chickens, theoretically, can be increased by a hundred (100!) Times per year. Svinskoe five times.

        Beef will double in only two to three years.
        1. Haettenschweiler
          Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 36 New
          0
          Quote: kostya-petrov
          In the production of poultry meat, we have already exceeded the entire USSR by 1.4 times (in the 1985 year in all the Union republics 2.8 million tons of poultry meat were produced together), and the RSFSR bypassed 2.2 times.


          - This is a good argument, but, comrade, in this case we are talking about something completely different. Be so kind, re-read the very beginning.
        2. onix757
          onix757 5 December 2015 10: 47 New
          0
          You can’t say anything, we learned how to grow a broached broiler that even cats don’t eat.
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 5 December 2015 11: 18 New
            0
            Quote: onix757
            which even cats don’t eat, we learned.

            - fed the cats, and now complaining ..
            “Have you learned?” Or is it someone else learned to feed you?

            And you are still picky .. like that cat, her right laughing
        3. aba
          aba 5 December 2015 10: 59 New
          +3
          By poultry production we have already surpassed the whole USSR

          It’s only a pity that beef at its price goes into the category of delicacies
          1. onix757
            onix757 5 December 2015 11: 05 New
            +1
            Yes, and fish too
        4. vassa
          vassa 5 December 2015 13: 08 New
          +1
          Somehow Putin responded well to the old representative of the Communist Party about the good "gross product": "There was gross product, only there was no meat."
  11. aleksandroff
    aleksandroff 5 December 2015 10: 21 New
    +6
    Quote: Haettenschweiler
    - Who needs to continue the painstaking work? Is the author generally aware of the meaning of the word "painstaking"? Or stamps - stamps and all that? Regarding work - Dima-iPhone fell asleep already on the President's "message". I think the other officials are in solidarity with him.

    Is there anything to say on the case? A bunch of written and all empty chatter liberal. Or are you by principle, if only to justify everything.
    1. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: aleksandroff
      Is there anything to say on the case? Or are you by principle, if only to justify everything.


      - As far as I understand, you can read little and badly. Otherwise, they would not have cited only the last paragraph and could see with their own eyes what is both "on the case" and "on principle", and whatever you like.
      And, by the way, I was sincerely amused by your new word "liberal" in the sense of "disgusting". As I understand it, for you now everything that does not fit into the framework of praising the president and his entourage will be "liberal". Don't you love Putin? You are a liberal. Are you not delighted with his message? You are a liberal. Do you think that the brightest officials will plunder everything again and create nothing? This is liberal chatter! In general, life is probably not difficult for you.
    2. gg.na
      gg.na 5 December 2015 10: 47 New
      -4
      Apparently his verbal diarrhea has begun! wassat The provocateur is sitting here again! yes
      1. Haettenschweiler
        Haettenschweiler 5 December 2015 10: 57 New
        0
        Quote: gg.na
        The provocateur is sitting here again!


        - And what was the provocation?
    3. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 5 December 2015 11: 15 New
      0
      Quote: aleksandroff
      Is there anything to say on the case?

      Since 2008, Russia has overtaken Canada, the European Union, Australia, Argentina in the production and sale of grain and is already backed by the United States.
      The main thing that needs to be done in Russia is lending with a low interest rate (3%) and so that officials do not interfere, they better sleep.
  12. apro
    apro 5 December 2015 10: 22 New
    +3
    Why don't I understand the joy of such numbers? To export more? Agriculture is a complex production and grain is one of its components, and livestock development should not be honored?
    1. SMikhalych
      SMikhalych 5 December 2015 10: 35 New
      0
      Quote: apro
      What is the joy I don’t understand from such numbers? To export more? Agriculture is a complex production and grain is one of its components, and livestock development should not be honored?

      There is nothing strange. If the country's food security is ensured, then why not sell the surplus beyond its borders? Just look at the statistics - http://ruxpert.ru/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1 % 81% D
      1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1
      % 81% D0% BD% D0% BE% D1% 81% D1% 82% D1% 8C_% D0% A0% D0% BE% D1% 81% D1% 81% D0% B8% D0% B8 - to understand that it is possible to sell part of the products is possible and necessary.
  13. V.ic
    V.ic 5 December 2015 10: 25 New
    +6
    Russia should consume products of its own production, and not fill the wallets of foreign producers. Well, if bananas / kiwi / oranges do not have time to ripen, then let the lover of it shell out. Krasnodar apples are not worse than Polish apples, and Vologda butter tastes better than any spreads. If we are talking about vodka (a national brand), then to hell with foreign swill (I will not list it!), Even VS Vysotsky wisely remarked in the song "Police Protocol:" And if vodka was not to be driven from sawdust ... ". ..
    Author's retreat: guys, I’m not an Alcan, I can honestly drink a glass or even two of these drinks at the celebration, I prefer dry wines and I know the measure.
    I continue on the topic of vodka. Turn Ossetian "burned" alcohol back. In ethanol production, use only substandard grain (rye and wheat). Turnover of alcohol-containing products under state control. Enough to get the population drunk. Prohibit independent clandestine production of high-grade alcoholic beverages. To burn out this practice with a hot iron up to the confiscation of property.
    1. Banshee
      Banshee 5 December 2015 13: 50 New
      0
      Quote: V.ic
      The turnover of alcohol-containing products under the control of the state.


      And the production too.
  14. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 5 December 2015 10: 27 New
    +1
    Today you think that Russia is a gas station, you can even be a Russophobe, and tomorrow you are no longer there. And so every 100 years.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 5 December 2015 11: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Denis-Skiff
      Today you think that Russia is a gas station, you can even be a Russophobe, and tomorrow you are no longer there. And so every 100 years.

      laughing Good for you! hi laughing
  15. onix757
    onix757 5 December 2015 10: 30 New
    +1
    we will soon be the largest agricultural country in the world

    This is from a series of flights to Mars. How can you make plans to increase the share of domestic agricultural products if the government puts only sticks in the wheel with its actions? This applies primarily to the decline of the rural population, lack of infrastructure, unavailability of loans and high cost of fuel and lubricants
  16. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 5 December 2015 10: 31 New
    +2
    Yes, it’s bad when a pie-maker starts to “tackle” boots, and a shoemaker bakes pies! It seems that most commentators know about the village by hearsay and from “popular prints”! You cannot think so lightly about something very serious, if not the most important thing in the development of Russia! The President in his message said about very serious tasks facing the whole country and the people, and some again "for a penny" fish! Everything will be done, as has happened more than once in recent centuries, and whoever and how would not try to interfere with us, Russia will go through all the difficulties and hardships and will become even stronger !!!
  17. Awaz
    Awaz 5 December 2015 10: 31 New
    +6
    fall to the ground. My fellow countryman, deputy of the State Duma of the Duma, deputy chairman of the committee of the same Duma on Agriculture, said recently that the entire income of the entire agro-industrial complex of Russia is ten times less than the income of only one Sberbank. Our country is not agricultural but usurious. People, as they can, are trying to work and produce domestic products on their land, but the banking system sucks from agriculture (and not only) everything that is possible and even beyond that ...
  18. tolancop
    tolancop 5 December 2015 10: 34 New
    +2
    "... agricultural exports amounted to nearly $ 20 billion ..."
    Probably not bad. But vague doubts torment me ... You can sell everything "over the hill". (At one time, the Romanian Ceausescu, in order to pay off debts, drove everything for export, leaving the domestic market naked). Is there anything left for domestic consumption? What are the stocks (this year the harvest, but suddenly next year it will be the other way around)? And why did we sell TURKISH tomatoes (also mentioned in the message) until recently? DO YOUR greenhouse facilities require unthinkable technologies?
    And what about livestock farming? Russia is importing meat so far. Grain is not only a loaf of bread, but also feed for cattle and poultry. Could it be more expedient to put grain in this direction?
    Including, IMHO, you can be happy about the export of food by Russia, but you don’t need to lose your head from enthusiasm.
    1. kostya-petrov
      5 December 2015 10: 39 New
      +2
      Quote: tolancop
      Is there anything left for domestic consumption?

      our country's need for grain for bread of our citizens - 30 millions per year!
      And this year they collected 107, 8 million tons of grain.
      So consider.

      PS Feed grain is a separate article, and it is no more than consumption for bread.
  19. Severok
    Severok 5 December 2015 10: 35 New
    +1
    Truth be told, the article directly carries populism. Where is the data on the development of Russian textiles, which is a derivative of the cultivation of flax? Where is the data on Russian seed fund production?
    But in the end, when it will be possible, passing through the central Russian outback, to see: on the roads are not timber trucks, but trailers with hay, grain milk trucks ???; not forested fields, but blue gave flax, golden rye, pink clover ???; when along the roads there will be no children and old people selling mushrooms, berries, and cucumbers, tomatoes, homemade milk ???; when will weddings again take place in the villages and there will be no need to get medical care for days ???

    Only then will I believe that the village of Russia is getting up from its knees when I see it with my own eyes, and not from the words of a certain Tkachev or Medvedev, nicknamed "iPhone".
  20. sabakina
    sabakina 5 December 2015 10: 35 New
    +7
    I will not write anything, just put the video. And God bless the earth, tractor drivers, combine harvesters, drivers!
  21. Sasha75
    Sasha75 5 December 2015 10: 36 New
    +1
    Our grain is sold at the state level, you simply do not have information after the ban on the sale of our grain on the foreign market, delegations from the Emirates cleared us and one of the key issues is buying grain, what’s the auction like at the ministerial level, here’s just one example that just goes in the press and you do not pay attention.
    1. onix757
      onix757 5 December 2015 11: 02 New
      +2
      Quote: Sasha75
      Our grain is sold at the state level. You simply do not own the information.

      OJSC United Grain Company (hereinafter referred to as OZK), in 2012, despite revenue growth by as much as 12%, to an amount of 30,39 billion rubles, received 1,97 billion rubles of net loss. This is stated in the OZK documents published on the corresponding website for the disclosure of public information. Recall that OZK is a company where 50% + 1 share is owned by the state, and the rest (not without the help of Mr. Dvorkovich and at the expense of the state bank) was taken over by the Summa group Ziyavudin Magomedov (which ranks 111th in the Russian Forbes oligarch rating ), while also able to impose its management on state-owned companies.
  22. Mihal71
    Mihal71 5 December 2015 10: 36 New
    +2
    After the secretary was removed from the Minister of Agriculture, her deputy Bazhanov was put on the international wanted list and achieved such results. Conclusion: we will not steal - we will begin to prosper.
  23. aba
    aba 5 December 2015 10: 56 New
    +1
    Farming is wonderful! But it is necessary that own industry provided agricultural products with all the necessary products from combines to nail. Otherwise, bending the Russian food program is not difficult. That is, independence - agriculture + industry!
  24. 2s5giacints
    2s5giacints 5 December 2015 11: 15 New
    +3
    and in the case, large agricultural holdings are subsidized. the collective farm has been abandoned. I know what I’m talking about. We have one collective farm alive, cattle bred and, by the way, not bad. So it exists due to slave labor, twice a year the wages are paid by the mouse and then by the tears of a mouse. poultry and pig-breeding complexes are automated and do not significantly affect the employment of the rural population. To a simple farmer, nifiga does not shine, nor government support, nor a sales market in retail chains. government support needs a lot of turnover in order to get a normal pullback or proximity to the authorities. The bulk of collective farmers vegetate or move into the cities, if possible.
  25. onix757
    onix757 5 December 2015 11: 17 New
    -1
    There is an example of successful development of industry in neighboring Belarus, but unfortunately it is alien to our feudal system.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 5 December 2015 11: 26 New
      +2
      Quote: onix757
      There is an example of successful development of industry in neighboring Belarus, but unfortunately it is alien to our feudal system.

      My minus to you ..... For the feudal system! Belarus at the expense of Russia is living for now! hi
      1. onix757
        onix757 5 December 2015 11: 51 New
        -1
        My minus to you ....

        I'm not chasing the pluses here.
        Belarus at the expense of Russia lives for now!

        And what is this account expressed in?
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. KBR109
    KBR109 5 December 2015 11: 27 New
    0
    How old is the article if the Ministry of Agriculture is Gordeev? Why discuss hoary antiquity?
  28. zahoder
    zahoder 5 December 2015 11: 50 New
    +2
    Mikhan, you take off your glasses. Or maybe you have a mask of an electric welder. About Belarus it is true. And about the feudal system, work somewhere at least in a state private house.
  29. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 5 December 2015 11: 51 New
    +4
    People! Take off your pink glasses!
    The bulk of our agricultural producers are debtors! Banks beat interest, and the government grants subsidies to offset the "interest rate" ...
    Agriculture bought up by banks and foreigners.
    THERE ARE AND FULLY WELL-FAVORABLE FARMS! LITTLE THEM!
    Quote: Aspeed
    The only more or less serious plus is the development of our own production of agricultural machinery, Rostselmvsh simply burns with napalm. But even here we should remember that a huge number of imported components are used.

    Rostselmash bought five plants in the USA and Canada. And it will not be cost-effective to transfer production to the Russian Federation yet. These are all jobs for the bourgeoisie!
    And what about the Kirovsky factory? In 2014, the plant produced eight hundred small tractors. Of these, 747 are for agriculture ... For the whole country!
    And the PCM tractor plant in Canada will not save us! Its production is about 2000 cars per year.
    Of these, 40% went to the Russian Federation, Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
    Completely exhausted its resource - 75 ... 85% of agricultural machinery in Russia!
    The whole increase in cereal production was achieved through the destruction of animal husbandry!
    Fertilizer prices have led to a partial abandonment of their use ...
    It will be possible to speak about the rise of agriculture in Russia only when I start working in industries with a "long turnover of money": cattle breeding and fruit growing.
    It was funny to watch in August (August, Karl) the statement of our drivers like: "Our producers will provide us ..." Tomorrow they will plant, and in a week they will harvest!
    NEED TO WORK, WORK AND WORK! GIVE MONEY TO MANUFACTURERS, NOT TO BANKS!
    Agriculture received 60 billion !!! The banks were given 1,76 ... trillion.
    Some mats ...
    Waiting for reasonable criticism!
  30. zahoder
    zahoder 5 December 2015 11: 59 New
    +2
    Yeah, many people don’t have glasses. But the welder’s mask is worse than a spacesuit. I don’t hear others.
  31. Pomeranian
    Pomeranian 5 December 2015 12: 28 New
    +6
    What was waiting for all the people from President Putin, this is a statement on the change of course and the resignation of the ruler of a hundred Dima- = iPhone. But since none of this happened, Russia is faced with very difficult times, in comparison with which the 90s will seem like a dream.
  32. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 5 December 2015 12: 28 New
    0
    Take-off from an oil and gas needle
    Falling oil prices unexpectedly revived Russian non-oil exports, and the low ruble exchange rate made industrial products competitive on the world market
    http://rusplt.ru/society/vzlet-s-neftegazovoy-iglyi-20047.html
    if we measure exports not in price terms, but in terms of physical volumes of supplies, then the growth will come out even more substantial - 11%. Envy China!
    I have been saying for a long time that it is necessary to estimate GDP in physical volumes, not in dollars, and in some sectors we will see growth!
  33. lis-ik
    lis-ik 5 December 2015 12: 40 New
    +2
    Maybe I have one, but I noticed how a more or less relevant article, so two-thirds disappears, what are some "problems" on the site?
  34. tanit
    tanit 5 December 2015 12: 48 New
    +2
    Hmm ... whatever Russia sells - some have only two answers - either feed the enemies or arm the enemies.
    And, worst of all, they call on the street to go out and see wassat He went out, looked - was horrified. Only now I didn’t see the crowds of the starving. Well, my vision is weak.
    It sounds particularly epic on behalf of 32-year-old pensioners. (Comrades, do not think badly about yourself)
  35. epsilon571
    epsilon571 5 December 2015 13: 14 New
    -4
    You can talk on this topic endlessly, ahead of the elections, here and show them your vision of the world. I know one thing for sure, the government of Medvedev and all its supporters must leave, as well as the party that supports all this, and this depends primarily on ourselves. Putin holds this rifle for the sake of loyalty, but perhaps he already understands the malignity of this event. Today is not 2008, but the patience of the People is not unlimited!
  36. Aleksander
    Aleksander 5 December 2015 13: 25 New
    0
    So, the goal is determined, the tasks are clear, now we need to continue the painstaking work, but taking into account past mistakes!


    And how many million times has this been spoken since 1917?
  37. HMR333
    HMR333 5 December 2015 13: 28 New
    +1
    I generally did not care about those who spoke about the gas station! IS IT BAD THAT THE COUNTRY HAS A LARGE STOCK OF FUEL? FIRST Russia THE RICHEST FOR RESOURCES COUNTRY COAL OIL GAS ETC SO LET THOSE WHO FOR THIS TOAD CRUSES LET GO THE FOREST! And at the strange gas station it's cheap TROLING ASK US ANY COUNTRY WOULD LIKE IT TO BE AS says the country gas station and you will hear definitely YES !!! SAME SASHIA is precisely a gas station for they DUE TO OIL-out war and destroys their land shale extraction!
  38. onix757
    onix757 5 December 2015 13: 30 New
    +1
    I generally did not care about those who spoke about the gas station! IS IT BAD THAT THE COUNTRY HAS A LARGE STOCK OF FUEL? FIRST Russia THE RICHEST FOR RESOURCES COUNTRY COAL OIL GAS ETC SO LET THOSE WHO FOR THIS TOAD CRUSES LET GO THE FOREST!

    I support, give cheap gasoline and the abolition of various requisitions! After all, the country is rich is not it?
  39. Zomanus
    Zomanus 5 December 2015 15: 19 New
    +2
    It seems to me that you need to invest in development and production
    in the areas of storage and processing of collected products.
    Because we need to store the collected 7-9 months.
    That would not chase the Belarusian stew and condensed milk,
    because they are always of high quality,
    and take ours, with confidence that there is a normal product.
  40. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 5 December 2015 17: 37 New
    +1
    Russia is not agrarian, it is a hard-working country. Do not interfere with its work
  41. Anisim1977
    Anisim1977 5 December 2015 17: 40 New
    +4
    Thanks to the author for the article - recalled about the huge resource of our country.
    Firstly, our food is no worse than foreign, therefore it is an obvious export product.
    Secondly - 40 million hectares, with a recipe for how they will be taken and put into circulation, it’s also a lot of CX equipment for processing, a lot of fertilizers and spare parts, a lot of fuel for engines, money as a salary for hard workers, etc. It is an engine for the economy.
    Thirdly - "ah, there are no residents in the villages. There is no one to work." I grew up in a village, my brother lives in a village, taking into account the development of the same combines and other agricultural equipment - people to cultivate the conventional HA of land, it is necessary at times or in tens of times less.
    The same goes for modern farms and breeding cattle, pigs, poultry.
    Russia is obliged to plow 100% of the land, fully feed itself and be the No. 1 exporter of CX in the world - this must become a brand like "KALASHNIKOV".
    Russia can do it - we must do it.
    Regarding Turkish tomatoes - we have a lot of our own, but the Turkish lobby did not let our delicious tomatoes into the market and about the same parsley on Abkhazian tomatoes. Find out how many large markets belong to the Turks or their good friends, you will understand - only by banning Turkish and European products, our products may have a chance to get on the shelves of our retail.
    And now our vegetables have only 1 problem for 100% coverage of the country's needs - the lack of modern and large vegetable stores. Make state-owned or regionally owned vegetable stores - where all 100% of the vegetables brought by the peasant will be bought 100% (yes, depending on the quality and price is different), and then the regional authorities will provide - storage, sale, logistics. Yes, these mega-warehouses will have spoiled goods - but it can be sold in bulk to large animal fattening farms, I don’t think that farm owners can unreasonably refuse.
    It is necessary to make Russia a Great Agrarian Power, but not giving up the remaining positions, but adding this Pride.
  42. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 5 December 2015 19: 23 New
    0
    Quote: Anisim1977
    taking into account the development of the same combines and other agricultural equipment - people for processing conventional GA land, it is necessary at times or tens of times less.

    And for the development of animal husbandry, the production of feed is necessary ...
    We need to grow corn, alfalfa, Sudanese, etc.
    Organize watering for this ...
    Mow and take out, and still water and mow ...
    And this is all the jobs! And this is a new technique (and jobs in factories)
    And on farms, animals need care (around the clock).
    .
    A grain cultivate - 50 people per 10 hectares (half - office)!
  43. VIA_56
    VIA_56 5 December 2015 20: 12 New
    +1
    Quote: alexej123
    Unfortunately, at present, crop production largely depends on the procurement of products of many foreign brands - both plant protection products (plant protection products), agricultural machinery, software, seed stock, and much more.

    Here I disagree with you. We can provide ourselves with technology for 100%. A giant like Rostselmash is working, God forbid, to be a quarter of its capacity. And Mr. Tkachev, the current Minister of Agriculture, is promoting Klaas harvesters. Why, yes, because in the screwdriver production of this German in Krasnodar, Tkachev has great personal interests. What is the topic of corruption in the highest echelons of state power? Is this Mr. interested in promoting domestic agricultural machinery? Answer yourself, or do you need a hint? And Rostselmash has a huge range of agricultural equipment. In all areas of agricultural production. And the price of grain is made up of both the consumed electricity and the price of fuel. And further, according to the list !!!
  44. Jozhkin Cat
    Jozhkin Cat 5 December 2015 20: 17 New
    +3
    Half an hour wrote a comment, spat and erased. I can recommend the author to live in the village for a couple of years for enlightenment, see how so much grain is collected, see how they relate to the earth ... In 50 years, we will live in the desert.
  45. tinibar
    tinibar 5 December 2015 21: 53 New
    0
    Quote: Aspeed
    No offense, why is the sale of grain considered a huge achievement? Back to the times of the Russian Empire?
    The only more or less serious plus is the development of our own production of agricultural machinery, Rostselmvsh simply burns with napalm. But even here we should remember that a huge number of imported components are used. That is, the fundamental industries are still not with us.
    It would be worth introducing laws like in Brazil - an enterprise starting work in our market is obliged to increase the localization of production by 5 percent every year. More is possible, less is not. That would be the result of the action.

    I can not agree that the sale of grain is not considered an achievement, although I agree otherwise. As you can see, the sale of grain brings good income. And most importantly, maintaining agricultural production at a high level, we support food independence, and this is a strategic task .. But for complete independence, of course, the production of agricultural machinery, fertilizers, and selection must be developed!
  46. cergey51046
    cergey51046 5 December 2015 22: 41 New
    -1
    It is necessary to apply the principles of natural farming and no arable land. They do not plow in the forest, but everything grows. You can not plow with a turnover of the reservoir, you can only loosen.
  47. berkut9737
    berkut9737 5 December 2015 23: 23 New
    +1
    agricultural exports amounted to almost $ 20 billion

    My friend lives near Ryazan on the former collective farm N. After perestroika, the collective farm was destroyed, and the collective farm lands were divided among the peasants. But what to do with this property if the common people do not have the money to create a small business? Soon, bankers from Moscow appeared in this village with an offer to sell these lands to a bank and people bought these offers. To date, the situation is as follows. Moscow bankers are engaged in agriculture in the same village. The same peasants are used as labor. Miserable salaries are paid, and all profits are taken away ... Here is such an export of agricultural products.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 6 December 2015 04: 26 New
      +1
      Quote: berkut9737
      My friend lives near Ryazan on the former collective farm N ... Here is such an export of agricultural products

      Well, and who is the evil Pinocchio here?

      Just don't say - "they didn't know" .. ignorance of the law does not exempt from responsibility yes

      Quote: berkut9737
      Moscow bankers are engaged in agriculture in the same village

      That is, they (the bankers) launched agricultural production .. my applause .. note - the peasants themselves could not do this.

      Quote: berkut9737
      The same peasants are used as labor.

      ... although it would be cheaper to bring in China, for example .. humanely ..

      Quote: berkut9737
      Salaries are paid miniscule, and all profits are taken away.

      Sound the order of numbers, plz .. And also - preferably - the name of the collective farm, where it is and the name of the bank ..

      Something tells me that you, my friend .. are slightly biased in this matter wink
      1. berkut9737
        berkut9737 6 December 2015 20: 48 New
        -1
        Well, and who is the evil Pinocchio here?

        Just don't say - "they didn't know" .. ignorance of the law does not exempt from liability yes

        Another example. Now they are distributing land in the Far East into property with the condition that the owner begins to build something there. The idea is good, but you need money to build something. If an interest-free loan would have been applied to this idea at least ... But that's all, as always. And this example is akin to the previous one and explains the scheme of half-hearted decisions of our interim government.
        That is, they (the bankers) launched agricultural production .. my applause .. note - the peasants themselves could not do this.

        You can look at the situation in different ways. From my bell tower, they simply robbed these people, and then they "started".
        ... although it would be cheaper to bring in China, for example .. humanely ..

        In this case, I wanted to emphasize the cynicism with which the aliens of the capital act.
        Sound the order of numbers, plz .. And also - preferably - the name of the collective farm, where it is and the name of the bank ..

        Something tells me that you, my friend .. are slightly biased in this matter wink

        I can not voice either names or surnames on the Internet, only in private conversation and at a meeting. hi
  48. Gunther
    Gunther 5 December 2015 23: 26 New
    +3
    dievleha Quote:
    Grain sales speak of underdeveloped animal husbandry, as the main consumer of feed, so there is nothing good about it

    An interesting conclusion is that in Pendoshkaniya there is an underdeveloped animal husbandry (share in world exports: wheat - 20%, Soybean - 60%, corn - more than 50%).
    And what it says, for example, is the sale for export in the first half of 1933 (the famine of 1932-1933) of 1,68 million tons of grain, which would provide 2 million people with a daily diet (1 kg) for six months, which could would save about half of those starving during this period.
    When we talk about the sale (purchase) of grain, we remember that there are hard and soft grades (which in turn are divided into classes, 5-6 feed grain), for example, the USSR, I bought Fodder grain - for animal husbandry: "because only the RSFSR (Russia) had 1988 million heads of cattle in 60, and now Russia has 20 million heads, that is, three times less." ©
    Quote:
    I remember those times when the Russian Federation bought grain - i.e. collected taxes from the population, bought the currency and bought it. After school I defended for 3 hours in a queue for bread for parents

    1.And I remember (USSR) discarded loaves (loaves of bread) in garbage cans. bread was affordable and cheap, the quality was a cut higher than the current "bloated" loaves, the proverb calling "Bread is a jewel, don't litter them, take bread for dinner in moderation" didn't give any sense - they littered (((
    2. If the lines you are talking about fall in the early 90s, then this was an organized process (sabotage).
    По покупке(продаже) зерна: http://newsruss.ru/doc/index.php/%D0%AD%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82_%D0%
    B7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B8%D0%B7_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8#.D0
    .A1_1991_.D0.B3.D0.BE.D0.B4.D0.B0
    What, actually, I want to say, the "jerk" about which the author speaks is relative, it depends on what to compare with.
    1. berkut9737
      berkut9737 5 December 2015 23: 37 New
      +2
      it depends on what to compare.

      This is the whole Solim born in the USSR, there is nothing to compare. And while we are alive, we will always be a thorn in the eyes of the current government.
  49. Gunther
    Gunther 6 December 2015 01: 06 New
    0
    And while we are alive, we will always be a thorn in the eyes of the current government.

    I agree.
    Now "economists" like "Yasin" are brazenly trying to imagine decades Chubais as a blessing for Russia.
    1. berkut9737
      berkut9737 6 December 2015 20: 58 New
      0
      Now "economists" like "Yasin" are brazenly trying to present the decades of Chubaisism as a boon for Russia.

      This is out of fear. They simply have nowhere to go and they are engaged in self-justification. They know that we will soon come to power, and our conversation with them will be very short.
  50. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 6 December 2015 04: 15 New
    0
    The only branch of the economy that does not believe and does not expect help from our "rulers" !!! They need to work for them for a day or a year. And long-term programs for bureaucrats and Medvedev /, as under the communists, it is good that in January the crops are not satisfied. Agricultural producers learn about subsidies only from TV.