Military Review

Russia is preparing the destruction of statehood. Our response to global depression

76
Russia is preparing the destruction of statehood. Our response to global depression



Based on a speech at a meeting in honor of the 250 anniversary of the Free Economic Society, the oldest civil society organization in Russia.

All of us are overwhelmed by current, momentary problems, and we are drowning in them. This is natural - but let us remember, even for a minute, that we live in an amazing, magnificent, amazing time with even now not fully visible possibilities. Sorry for vulgarity, but tell me something familiar today during my youth: “I’m calling you from the forest, now I’ll take a photo of my phone and send it by soap,” I would still be trying to cure me today. We do not think about our capabilities because we are used to focusing on problems. And partly we are right: new opportunities and technologies generating them have a downside.

So, the global crisis, about which it is fashionable to talk about the last decade, is quite simple and sad: in the global market, as in any, there are global monopolies that, as expected, rot. And for years, 15 has been delaying human genius, often in terrible and destructive ways, by disrupting this decaying monopolism into a global depression.

For some time we will hold out, but most of us will see a depression worse than the Great one: like that, it will generate war, but war will no longer be a way out of it. Indeed, in the course of the global depression, unlike the Great, the market will not disintegrate, but collapse - and competition will not grow, but will fall, aggravating the negative consequences of monopolism. And the division of the global market is already well marked.

Global monopolies are more powerful than states, and even the United States is, in fact, under external control. The main subject of the world economy and politics is no longer the state that is at least responsible to its people, but a fundamentally irresponsible global business. And when our distinguished diplomats seriously communicate with the heads of other states that are integrated into this global business and are its junior managers, it looks as if you were at a reception talking with the waiter instead of the host - and then you would feel that the waiter was not able to speak. President of the U.S.A.

The main contradiction of our time is the contradiction between global monopolies, which reign over states and deny any separation from them, and the states themselves. At the level of ideology, this is a contradiction between the liberals, who believe that the state should serve global business, and patriots, who believe that the state is the brain and the hands of society and should serve the people as the only thing that really has the right to exist on our planet.

Our politicians, unaware of, but instinctively feeling this contradiction, are trying to solve Putin’s Munich speech by asking for cooperation from the West or, at best, an attempt to force it to work. But the contradiction between global business and the states has reached the utmost urgency, and statehood is already being destroyed as such.

What do we see in the former flowering countries - from Yugoslavia to Syria? What is prepared for us, Russia? The destruction of statehood is simply out of economy: after all, buying oil from the most powerful field commander is much cheaper than from the weakest state. And in order to reduce costs — and in a crisis and growing uncertainty this is a categorical imperative — it is necessary to eliminate statehood.

In order to survive in this situation, to turn the contradiction between the global business and the national state not into a mass grave, but, as it should be, into a source of development, we need to prove the right to exist: that it is much more expensive and more dangerous to destroy than leave us at rest.

Put yourself in the place of the West: 27 years of our national betrayal, he consumed Russia as an abandoned trophy space. Imagine that you 27 years old every morning, open the fridge and eat a meatball, which lies there. And suddenly one day this cutlet declares its interests to you, makes claims and tries to enter into negotiations with you, and even equal rights - and absolutely does not want to crawl to you in the throat and further into the stomach. Naturally, you will experience shock, go into hysterics, introduce sanctions, call her a contagious disease and try to tear it to shreds.

To survive, we need to change the approach to life. To begin to act not in order to earn more individually, but in order to preserve and improve our common life - and these are different tasks.

27 years of national betrayal - a time of endless talk about the need for development. And it already seems to many that this is an absurdly complex and technologically unsolvable task.

Meanwhile, everything is pretty simple. First of all, it is necessary to modernize the infrastructure: this will not only reduce costs and jump in business activity, it will give freedom. After all, freedom is not a book of rights, but an excess of infrastructure. The best Constitution, as, for example, in many countries of Latin America, is an empty ring without infrastructure, because without it no rights can be secured.

To modernize the infrastructure, it is necessary to limit corruption: otherwise everything will be stolen. This is a tutorial from the textbook: there would be a desire. If desired, it was possible to suppress it in the most rotten, law enforcement and judicial systems, not only in Italy, but also in the United States. Mankind has developed standard self-cleaning mechanisms, in fact, social automata - and they are effective.

Liberals are offended for their accusations of state inefficiency, but this is almost the only thing they are right about. (To clarify, the liberals today, unlike Voltaire, are not those who love freedom, but those who believe that the state should serve global business.)

They are right: the state makes everything worse than private business. But this is only one side of the coin. The other side is simple: society itself is unable to do much, without which it cannot exist. If, for example, money was safe for society to follow students, as Mr. Kuzminov says, the state would be almost unnecessary - but we can see where the realization of this idea leads to, and is convinced by the nightmarish experience: theories or in practice.

And what else is necessary to know about the state: if it needs something, and it really wants to do it, it does it. With costs, C grade - but all and always. It solves reasonably assigned tasks under any circumstances.

Therefore, it is possible to restrict corruption to ensure the modernization of infrastructure, as well as the arbitrariness of monopolies can be limited, and to provide reasonable protectionism, at least at the level of the European Union.

In order to modernize the infrastructure and make steady progress, it is also necessary to guarantee the real cost of living: the situation is not compatible with any development when 20% of the population is slowly dying.

Full economic freedom is required for all but monopolists.

It is necessary to restore comprehensive education and health care as instruments for the creation of the people and the main productive force of man and science. After all, practice has already shown: additional investments in today's liberal-reformed education and health care systems give nothing but an increase in moronism and an increase in mortality.

And the main thing: the golden key to modernization is the separation of speculative capital from the rest of the economy. To make impossible a situation in which an attempt to build a barn turns around scrolling the relevant money in speculative markets with building a house in Switzerland instead. All developed countries at our level of maturity of the financial system with an iron wall, although by different methods, separated speculative money from the rest of the economy. Whoever did not do this, he simply did not become developed: otherwise development is impossible.

But what is needed for the realization of these elementary truths, which are simply embarrassing to repeat? Those disgraces that our state creates in the socio-economic sphere can be explained by its creation at the beginning of 90, even in the bowels of the USSR, as a tool to plunder the Soviet inheritance and legalize what was stolen in fashionable countries in the form of personal wealth. If so, for our survival and development it is necessary to eliminate this model of statehood - of course, according to the law.

The only alternative to this hypothesis is to imagine that the last five generations of Russian managers were fools. But this is not confirmed by observations: in the state, not very smart people are not kept, - for the same reason that not very rich people are kept.

To normalize the implementation of Russian statehood, the Criminal Code is sufficient even in its current form, crippled by Medvedev. But why it is not executed, including in terms of criminal negligence, under which more than half of actions in the sphere of social and economic policy fall, is a question to the nature of government. Our state is one of the most efficient in the world and, probably, in the whole stories management organisms. The question is what he wants.

Therefore, the first step of recovery is to end the omnipotence of people who consider statehood, including ours, the servant of global business. The American who blurted out: “What is good for General Motors is good for America,” he apologized for this nonsense for the rest of his life. And here, it seems, the social and economic policies of the state are determined by people, people who think: for Russia, what is good for General Motors is good.

Our society is obliged simply for the sake of self-preservation to force its state to development and responsibility, - as the latter forced Saakashvili to peace in the 2008 year. Of course, another method.

After all, the objective duty of the state is the organization of development, the organization of technological and social progress, the formation of a favorable conjuncture. Not submission to the conjuncture, which is formed for him by his enemies and competitors, but the independent creation of this conjuncture. All the possibilities for this.

The difference between the state and the family is one thing: it is not only able, but also obliged to issue money according to the needs of the economy. Moreover, the state should itself shape this need.

But when the state ignores its duties, it remains only to recall the words of Zhores Alferov. After that, although he was a Nobel laureate, there were certain troubles, so I will not repeat it, but I will redefine Deng Xiaoping: what difference does a cat have if it doesn’t catch mice? - It is necessary to drown such cats.

Of course, the task of the responsible part of society is precisely in that it does not have to drown this cat, so that our state begins to perform its direct official duties, without which it does not have, like any state, the right to exist.

Of course, I would like the kind and wise uncle to come and do everything for us. But Evgeny Maksimovich, unfortunately, will no longer come. Therefore, we will have to do this, regardless of our desire, simply from the instinct of self-preservation, to us: with all our shortcomings and vices.

No one else.

If we do not do this, we will simply die - ahead of time and hardly tidy.
Originator:
http://delyagin.ru/articles/90562-nash-otvet-globalnoj-depressii.html
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ILIA
    ILIA 3 December 2015 19: 33
    +2
    HOW have survived just yet)
    1. shooter18
      shooter18 3 December 2015 19: 39
      0
      If we compare economic development models, then historically there are 2 types: European and Asian, in the first model private business and private property predominate, and in the second only state-owned business .. So these guys who started their business 200-300 years ago are rude speaking in the garage, now there are large corporations around the planet (for example, the economy of General Motors is now stronger than the economy of Lithuania or Latvia) and the state is a lobbyist for its interests in the foreign market !!
      1. The comment was deleted.
  2. shooter18
    shooter18 3 December 2015 19: 36
    11
    The American, who blurted out: “What is good for General Motors is good for America,” apologized for this stupidity for the rest of his life. And it seems that in our country the socio-economic policy of the state is determined by people, people who believe that what is good for General Motors is good for Russia.

    For Americans, the interests of business intersect with the interests of the state and they won’t even think about taking their money, for example, to Germany or elsewhere ..
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 3 December 2015 21: 58
      +3
      Shooter

      Where do they carry dollars? Are you out of your mind?

      Export dollars from the country where the dollar is the highest.
    2. Nick
      Nick 4 December 2015 18: 56
      +1
      Quote: shooter18
      For Americans, the interests of business intersect with the interests of the state and they won’t even think about taking their money, for example, to Germany or elsewhere ..

      The Americans took their entire business to Southeast Asia. There, production costs are lower, and they do not care about their state and unemployment.
  3. Boos
    Boos 3 December 2015 19: 44
    12
    We have few names in Russia that personify statehood. Unfortunately ...
    1. sherp2015
      sherp2015 3 December 2015 20: 41
      +3
      Quote: Boos
      We have few names in Russia that personify statehood. Unfortunately ...


      A good man was Kondratenko once the governor of the Krasnodar Territory. A real Russian patriot who did not hesitate to tell the truth ...
    2. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 4 December 2015 04: 18
      -3
      Quote: Boos
      We have few names in Russia that personify statehood

      And for 15 years, human genius has been delaying, often in terrible and destructive ways, the frustration of this decaying monopoly in global depression.

      The author is about Putin ?? laughing
      Therefore, we will have to do this, regardless of our desire, simply from the instinct of self-preservation, to us: for all our shortcomings and vices.

      No one else.

      If we do not do this, we will simply die - ahead of time and hardly tidy.

      Not for barricades the author calls us for an hour ???
    3. Skif83
      Skif83 4 December 2015 09: 16
      +4
      Well, for the whole of Russia, probably not worth it.
      But in the political "elite" it is difficult to call anyone a "statist".
      So the people also had a hand, I remember those times when old women voted for the "truly" Russian Nemtsov (the earth was glass wool to him), and even with foaming at the mouth they proved it. It was these Nemtsovs, Chubais, etc., who built our statehood in positions convenient for foreign "partners", and Siluanovs with dvoruovichs from the same deck.
      Mold needs to be cleaned prophylactically, and not when it has already corroded everything ...
  4. zekaze1980
    zekaze1980 3 December 2015 19: 49
    +8
    Mdaa ... Primakov is sorely lacking now, but he helped.
  5. Andrey NM
    Andrey NM 3 December 2015 19: 51
    19
    Put yourself in the place of the West: 27 years of our national betrayal, he consumed Russia as an abandoned trophy space. Imagine that you 27 years old every morning, open the fridge and eat a meatball, which lies there. And suddenly one day this cutlet declares its interests to you, makes claims and tries to enter into negotiations with you, and even equal rights - and absolutely does not want to crawl to you in the throat and further into the stomach. Naturally, you will experience shock, go into hysterics, introduce sanctions, call her a contagious disease and try to tear it to shreds.

    Not quite right. Cutlet - the contents of the refrigerator. This refrigerator stops opening and requires compliance with all the consequences. But the refrigerator still has a problem - the cord to the outlet, which can be turned off by those who open the refrigerator (dictates the energy prices on which we depend). And our task is to make sure that it does not depend on this outlet, and at the same time not only cutlets, but also candies, cookies, etc., appeared in our refrigerator, which could not be dispensed with, and to open the door , you need to throw a coin in the hole, and especially zealous people who wanted to open the refrigerator for free, were shocked by the current from the case ...
  6. Dilshat
    Dilshat 3 December 2015 19: 56
    47
    Zhores Alferov about the state- "If a citizen is forced to pay for education and medical care, accumulate pension from his own funds, pay housing and utilities in full, at market prices, then why do I need such a state ?! Why should I still pay taxes and maintain insane army of officials? I have always said at all levels that health care, education and science should be provided from the budget. If the state dumps this concern on ourselves, let it disappear, it will be much easier for us! "
    1. WINovikov
      WINovikov 3 December 2015 22: 09
      14
      Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye! If, if only it were possible to give our ministers of education, health, etc., the prime minister in the eye for every "mistake", then maybe they would start working for the good of the country. But...
      1. Throw
        Throw 4 December 2015 04: 40
        +5
        in the eye for every "mistake" ..

        ..we will have blind officials. But...
  7. roskot
    roskot 3 December 2015 20: 01
    +2
    Everything is so sad. I think this will pass.
  8. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 3 December 2015 20: 13
    +8
    Yes, a very good article. Full understanding of the problems.
    The worst thing is that the current Russian elite is on the path to subjugating global business and destroying Russia's statehood and there is no one to stop it. There are no forces opposing them, all have long been destroyed. Putin is doing a lot to revive a strong state, but he does not seem to understand the destructiveness of the economic course. For the development of the country, the economy must have a different foundation, not a liberal one.
    1. WINovikov
      WINovikov 3 December 2015 22: 13
      +6
      olimpiada 15 Putin does a lot to revive a strong state, but he seems to have no understanding of the destructiveness of the economic course.
      Are you sure there is no understanding? Understanding may be there, but ... life and a chair are more expensive. A "guarantor" that guarantees nothing.
      1. Boos
        Boos 4 December 2015 09: 43
        +1
        It guarantees free air, which shakes with speeches ... True, the air is already dirty in our city.
  9. bubla5
    bubla5 3 December 2015 20: 17
    19
    It’s just a paradox in Russia, the legislative fight against corruption is carried out by corrupt officials themselves
    1. cniza
      cniza 3 December 2015 20: 35
      +5
      Quote: bubla5
      It’s just a paradox in Russia, the legislative fight against corruption is carried out by corrupt officials themselves



      And so with us in everything, bees versus honey.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 3 December 2015 20: 20
    +4
    I always remember savages and glass beads. How could this happen to our country?
    Too shy to ask ---- number 27 -? Answer --- 1988?
  11. SPACE
    SPACE 3 December 2015 20: 20
    -1
    Yesterday, rivalry between states was brought to the fields of a free economy and the media to advertise goods and services, similar to how power rivalry was embodied in Greece in fair sports Olympic games. This, on the one hand, reduced the intensity and predictably for a while, lowered the degree of war, as the participants were forced to fight for a place in the sun in the framework of free competition and equal conditions in the promotion of goods and services. But, today the number of participants and offers in the market is growing significantly faster than the market itself, which makes the business increasingly less profitable and even tougher in terms of competition. Which, on the one hand, naturally, in the absence of restrictions, leads to the bankruptcy of the weak, on the other hand, to the absorption of emerging markets and the consolidation of monopolies, which, in turn, by acquiring power comparable to state structures, attract the state apparatus and their structures to ensure their interests. So the Kulikovo battles with their heroes are a thing of the past, and today's commanders of financial battles are heads of corporations closely connected with the state, from Russia they are generals of economic armies Rosneft Miller and Gazprom Sechin, but this is not Russia's goal itself, but only the state’s self-preservation instinct and reaction of counteraction to pressure from outside .......
  12. Alex Xorkam
    Alex Xorkam 3 December 2015 20: 23
    34
    Almost everything is correct, but there is at least one aspect. Global business is not very interested in profitability. Financial speculation, “quantitative easing,” and the like, are much more cost-effective than acquiring oil from a field commander. Most importantly, it is likely that almost all the needs of the global business are satisfied. You can have a need to have ten gold toilets, but hardly anyone has a need to have a thousand gold toilets. There is money, but there is no need, then attempts to satisfy the need for power begin. Better on the absolute and the world. Most governments have already been purchased and are behaving as they should. Many countries liberalized until they were ready to be ruled by a golden calf. People, thanks to propaganda, which is very sophisticated in the age of IT technologies, are also mostly ripening, but some countries and primarily Russia are resisting and it is difficult to destroy it. Resisting not to degrade is the problem of Russia and its citizens.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Turkir
      Turkir 3 December 2015 20: 26
      +6
      To resist (and) not to degrade is the problem of Russia and its citizens.

      Thank you for the smart conclusion. hi
    3. gladcu2
      gladcu2 3 December 2015 22: 57
      +1
      Alex Xorkam

      I will try to object to you. That satisfaction with the golden toilets that you are talking about can only occur if there is one powerful absolute monopoly. Which will devour all competitors, destroy the market and competitors.

      As long as there are at least two huge monopolies, they will fight for survival regardless of the price.

      So for the possession of gold toilets still need to fight with a deadly enemy.

      But as always there is a way out. Will agree. And the guarantor of the contract can only be the state. Which carries legislative and regulatory functions.
    4. Andrey NM
      Andrey NM 4 December 2015 05: 39
      +1
      There is such a circle - politics, power, money.
      Money is a means of conducting politics, politics is a means of achieving power, power is a means of achieving money. And so in a spiral.
  13. 3axap82
    3axap82 3 December 2015 20: 36
    +1
    Author M. Delyagin? Word for word, his speech in an interview.
    1. epsilon571
      epsilon571 3 December 2015 21: 30
      +4
      Yes, it is precisely those like Mikhail Gennadievich that need to be brought to power. Why isn't Primakov new to you! I have been listening to and reading his articles for a long time, there was an opportunity even to correspond in "Contact", an excellent economist.

      1. gameover_65
        gameover_65 4 December 2015 06: 03
        +1
        such as delyagin, it is necessary to drive into the neck. who finances its IPROG (Institute for Globalization Issues)? What does this institute organized by Delyagin do?

        Institute activities are organized around programs, each of which has its own tasks, and often its own team. A significant part of these programs is carried out by the Institute with the support of ideologically close Western organizations - the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, the Transnational Institute, the Ebert Foundation, the "Transform" network, etc.

        there are enough of such in the government!
  14. Grim Reaper
    Grim Reaper 3 December 2015 20: 37
    10
    Strange, but after reading I remembered ...: "The one who loves the Motherland does not like the state."
  15. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 3 December 2015 20: 44
    +5

    Of course, I would like for the kind and wise uncle to come and do everything for us. But Evgeni Maksimovich, unfortunately, will not come again. Therefore, you have to do it, regardless

    Yes, Primakov was, of course, a Person. And if I steered for at least five years, then
    I think that the country would have a different economy.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. GAF
    GAF 3 December 2015 20: 50
    +3
    An article from the resource of Delyagin, a well-known "all-pervading". Not everything is so gloomy in reality. Thousands of new factories have been built. We are the leader with the USA in the arms market and grain export. There is bread. Strategic and tactical nuclear weapons are quite enough for an independent policy. Maybe not everything is done as quickly as we would like. But Russia is a self-sufficient country, and there is no reason to "cry into the vest" with anguish.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 3 December 2015 22: 37
      +4
      If we are self-sufficient, then why is power from high tribunes constantly browing? Come, invest, take the initiative ... Even in the president’s message there is no slogan: NO ONE EXCEPT US! Why are we always in the role of the beggar? Why not: US IT'S ON THE SHOULDER!
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 3 December 2015 23: 12
        0
        34 region

        What are you independent?
        This USSR was independent. And Russia is integrated into the global economy. And the government is doing everything possible to prevent disintegration. Existing sanctions are precisely that external factor.
        1. 34 region
          34 region 3 December 2015 23: 27
          +2
          Well, I'm talking about too. What are we independent? We even buy hammers in China. And slippers. As I understand it, these are high-tech products. For the production of these, we need to visit the monasteries of China to familiarize themselves with the secrets! Even the insoles, and those are Chinese! Well damn what a high technology! When will we catch up with China? Or does it not threaten us?
    2. gladcu2
      gladcu2 3 December 2015 23: 09
      +2
      GAF

      The article is not a question, everything is gone.

      The emphasis is put there that if you do not work to restore and preserve the state, then everything will certainly fall.

      The truth in the article is not completely brought to the end the essence of what needs to be done. Mostly focus on the fight against corruption. But this is not enough.
    3. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 4 December 2015 04: 23
      0
      Quote: GAF
      . We are leading the USA in the arms market and grain export. There is bread. Strategic and tactical nuclear weapons are enough to conduct an independent policy

      As the USSR reminded .. recall how he finished .. ???
  19. midshipman
    midshipman 3 December 2015 20: 50
    13
    Great article. I don’t understand why Yasins, Kuzminovs, his wife, etc. are under state control. I remember 1990 the USSR Ministry of Radio Industry is being liquidated, like the other 8 defense ministries. One Ministry of Defense Industry is being created. As a scientist from the Heads of State Institutions, they transfer me to work as the rector of the Academy of Defense Industries. This is where the Kuzminov got into a mess. He tried to capture all the Academy buildings in his HSE. Only thanks to the Deputy Minister Yu.A. Glybin I managed to find a way to preserve this scientific institution.
    At one time I had to be a confidant in the elections to the Supreme Soviet of Yu.D. Maslyukova. I understand those readers of "VO" who bitterly state the absence of such specialists as Primakov and Maslyukov in the Government of the country. I have the honor.
    1. smith7
      smith7 3 December 2015 22: 47
      +3
      I share your praise for the article, and Delyagin himself causes my deep respect. Tell me, if you deem it possible, how long will it take until there are no people with the mentality of a "concrete mixer owner" in the government, but professionals with pure thoughts about the good of Russia? Is there any hope that this is at least in principle possible?
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 3 December 2015 23: 19
        +5
        smith7

        Long. Until a new generation grows up on the basis of the state education system. As well as the selection of correctly oriented literate, self-educating, self-educating young people, under the administrative control of a state authority such as the KGB.

        By the way, the same KGB made a selection of rare scum for management positions in Ukraine in the 90 years. And he tracked these candidates and prepared for positions since the 70s.

        This is my suspicion. Because I was familiar with those who rule the ball.

        Just a word had.
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 4 December 2015 04: 29
          +2
          Quote: gladcu2
          By the way, the same KGB made the selection of rare scum for management positions on

          What were you respected KGB about then, it was completely disorientated - you didn’t have time to change certificates .. KGB - FSK - MBVD-FSB, after betraying Bakatin (so that he could burn in hell) their hands fell ...
          And own nat. frames and missed a homogeneous type of personality to power ..
  20. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 3 December 2015 20: 51
    +1
    Put yourself in the place of the West: 27 years of our national betrayal, he consumed Russia as an abandoned trophy space. Imagine that you 27 years old every morning, open the fridge and eat a meatball, which lies there. And suddenly one day this cutlet declares its interests to you, makes claims and tries to enter into negotiations with you, and even equal rights - and absolutely does not want to crawl to you in the throat and further into the stomach. Naturally, you will experience shock, go into hysterics, introduce sanctions, call her a contagious disease and try to tear it to shreds.

    To survive, we need to change the approach to life. To begin to act not in order to earn more individually, but in order to preserve and improve our common life - and these are different tasks.
    today it will not work until those on whom we are dependent, understand or wake up. No brakes, benchmarks, values.
    Soul sold.
    Our country used to be a solid monastery.
  21. pts-m
    pts-m 3 December 2015 21: 03
    +1
    Some excuses, excuses, and so on and so forth. Thoughts from actions are very different. It all depends on independence, but we DO NOT have it. Solid boltology.
  22. boris-1230
    boris-1230 3 December 2015 21: 14
    +2
    We have wild capitalism, when power has united with big business and is lobbying for the interests of 10 percent of the rich. We have an ugly income gap between rich and ordinary hard workers, and this cannot go on forever. The revolutionary situevina according to Lenin, the seventeenth year is near
    1. Owl
      Owl 3 December 2015 21: 35
      +6
      By all their actions, the ruling structure (members of the government, deputies, directors of state banks) is encouraging the population of Russia to protest. Under the pretext of “fighting the crisis and sanctions,” these “powers that be” reduce the standard of living of ordinary citizens to the maximum, payments to employees of state structures are reduced due to the refusal of various payments, funds for providing for disabled people are reduced, and so on. But these “fellow citizens” didn’t take a dime from their “beloved ones”, for example: to “overcome inflation” the amount of bonuses was increased for the deputies by 40% (they did not dare to raise their salaries). There was no harsh assessment and harsh punishment for the robbers (Serdyuk and Zhenya Serduchka are the authorities' diagnosis). Until the power is real, and not in words, to share the "hardships and hardships" with the Russian People, until the "power children" study, and subsequently live in Russia, until the Law becomes the same for all enemies and criminals, depending on kinship or friendship with the president and the prime minister, the situation in Russia will not change.
      1. 34 region
        34 region 3 December 2015 22: 56
        +1
        The law is the same for everyone !? Is this again to leveling? Justice? What is it like? The same punishment as a cleaning lady and an oligarch? Not fair. Responsibility is different. The cleaning lady has a mop, and the oligarch has the entire industry. The income from the cleaning lady in prison, in the wild, is small. But plant the oligarch! What is his income in prison? What? He steals, he knocked down people, drunk at the wheel ... But so who has a higher percentage of profit? The oligarch or those whom he brought down? The oligarch has more profit. Suggest chopping a chicken carrying money? Therefore, there will be no return to the past. Well, how is this view of the issue of justice? The message has already clearly said on this topic. From criminal to administrative. We will not have the 37th year. How many times has been said. Is it really incomprehensible?
        1. gladcu2
          gladcu2 3 December 2015 23: 35
          +1
          34 region

          The oligarch is the same as everyone. If he is responsible for his business, then there will always be someone else who can take this responsibility upon himself.

          While the oligarch rests from everyday affairs in the conditions of ascetic.

          For nemuy in a drunken form is worn in public places.
    2. 34 region
      34 region 3 December 2015 22: 40
      +4
      Do we have wild capitalism? Is it home in the west? Is padding countries into the Stone Age a civilized approach?
      1. boris-1230
        boris-1230 4 December 2015 04: 12
        +1
        Yes, in the West another, more socially oriented. In Norway, for example, medicine is completely free, people work for 6 hours, etc. The prime minister explains this by saying that the country is rich and can afford it. So think about it, we are not poorer, but the picture is completely different.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  23. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 3 December 2015 21: 21
    +4
    Quote: zekaze1980
    Mdaa ... Primakov is sorely lacking now, but he helped.

    Unfortunately, our autocrats lack courage, who succumb to the interests of their friends and thereby betray the interests of the country and the aspirations of the people! The next message to the GDP will again contain a disguised appeal to the people to tolerate their "bedbugs" who drink the blood of the Russian economy, calls to fight corruption, and curses (also disguised) against "partners." And we should talk about building a social state, limiting the omnipotence of officials and oligarchs, it is necessary to change the system of government for the good of the country, and not support the bankers who constantly betray this country and in fact kill the peoples of Russia, making their fortunes! And these annual blah-blah, which do not lead to anything in reality, are somehow not accepted by soul and mind. sad
    1. WINovikov
      WINovikov 3 December 2015 22: 29
      +2
      What a "guarantor" with annual rants about nothing, that the prime minister with endless blah blah blah. One another stand. As long as there is no personal responsibility for the task entrusted, as in the days of J.V. Stalin, our collective irresponsibility will flourish and smell. The smell is clearly not flowers.
    2. 34 region
      34 region 3 December 2015 23: 07
      +2
      The social state? The welfare state is a state of loafers sitting on the neck. Learn from Muscovites. Even disabled people in transitions earn there. And this is a private initiative of citizens (private business). The omnipotence of officials !? Well, power must have power! Otherwise, what kind of power is this without power? The good of the country? We are moving towards globalization. Even the president says: We need to integrate into the global economy! What is not clear? We need to publish posters: Have you integrated into the global economy? On the outskirts, for example, they integrated themselves as suicides. And by whom did YOU integrate?
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 3 December 2015 23: 41
        +1
        34 region

        You have misconceptions about the social state.

        Ask the Israelites about their state. Sufficient social guarantees were preserved there, but for all that, the working month is considered normal at 270 working hours. And abbreviated, for which they can fire, this is 240 hours of work.

        But these are excesses, of course.
        1. 34 region
          34 region 3 December 2015 23: 56
          +2
          Do I have misconceptions about a social state? This is not my idea. Judging by our media, our government thinks so. Well, maybe I have a perverted understanding of the media? hi Personally, as I understand our policy. winked
  24. Koliamba_TV
    Koliamba_TV 3 December 2015 22: 06
    +3
    Everything in this article is said as it should be in order to solve these problems, but not everything is as simple as it seems. The number of monopolists can only be reduced by the emergence of new competitors. It all starts small, and so it is with a business: a large company emerges from small. Often, small entrepreneurs are simply "strangled." As a result, small business practically does not develop, and therefore the monopoly remains.
    As for education, everything is not so good either. Every year the load on schoolchildren increases, that is, more and more innovations are being introduced, instead of raising the level.
    And the last one is corruption. It is impossible to speed up it, but it is very possible to minimize it, and it has already diverged too much, but this is the problem: there are not many people who want to expose, and the result is still minimal.
    Personally, I find it difficult to predict how these problems will be resolved. Either all "bad" officials will really come to their senses, or there is a person who will put things in order with a firm hand. As the saying goes: "Wait and see."
    1. 34 region
      34 region 3 December 2015 23: 14
      +2
      Limit the number of monopolists? Easy. A couple, a trio will suit you? Small business is a flaw in a large business. But it is a matter of time. If your business is so profitable, sooner or later it will be collectivized. Sorry, personal freedom! No need to thank me. We are for private business (a narrow circle of people). No entry for unauthorised people!
  25. cap
    cap 3 December 2015 22: 14
    +3
    The article is correct but untimely. Autumn leaf over snow.
    I would say the song of Icarus, which no one understood on earth and he flew to the sun.
    Oligarchic capitalism. This phrase is known to students of political economy.
    Our time, complements this concept with the fact that the process has become global. The oligarch in Russia and his interests are included in the world structure of capital circulation. Capital is more international than the proletariat, which is no longer in the civilizations that gave rise to it. Therefore, there is no contradiction between labor and capital, about which Marx wrote. Globalism is characterized by the fact that in the 21st century entire states of rentiers appeared, living on rent from intellectual property, which has been concentrated in their hands for centuries.
    Its influx is still the main task of a developed society. Hence the theft of brains around the world. Anything that does not fit into the framework of such expediency is simply swept aside. The second problem is raw materials for the simple satisfaction of the needs of industry and unevenly and “unfairly” distributed around the planet. the interests of national elites diverge.
    Border maps mapped the global capital integration process.
    And this is now the main problem. Different groups of national elites solve it in different ways, but with one goal to prevent the loss of "material" material status, their share of capital. Hence the emergence of new trade associations on all continents. The solution to this problem is from a simple "this is mine" and "this is ours" is occupied by a small number of representatives of the ruling national elites.
    The peoples of the countries that, unfortunately became the owners of these natural resources, have the worst of all. A vivid example is the current situation in Syria. Winning on either side of the conflict will only change the relationship between the borders between
    the owners of natural rent. The life of the people living there will improve from this depends on the benevolence of the new owners. As far as can be judged from Syria, the new "owner" sent the population to a comfortable Europe having received a decent gesheft. Arriving nephews will not treat her to cyanide to occupy a spare room. As it turned out, the Syrians are not the majority in Europe.
    How will it all end? If you believe the great German K. Marx great war.
    Let's hope that in his age without the Internet, he was mistaken. hi
    1. 34 region
      34 region 3 December 2015 23: 47
      0
      Wonderful! Plus! Russia's oligarchy is included in the global structure !? Yes and no. They climbed for free cheese. No more. For this, cheese was laid. The financial international is more real than the worker. The influence of the financial international is real. There is no worker. Intellectual Property Rent !? Are they Saudis? USA I still believe. Here they really steal minds around the world. True to this, the whole world is driven into the Stone Age. National elites !? Or maybe they are lackeys, not the elite? Nephews? These are homeless people, not nephews. Here they are bet. Add cyanide and take out everything valuable for a dose of drugs. Syria? And why the territory of the country? Why not oil reserves? Maybe a whole ocean of oil lies under Iraq, Libya, Syria? Great war? This is how to look. For whom is war, and for whom is competition. Everything in the world is relative.
  26. Gunther
    Gunther 3 December 2015 22: 44
    +4
    Well done M. Delyagin, correct article.
    Reptiloid Quote:
    Too shy to ask ----- figure 27 -? Answer --- 1988?

    Well, M. Delyagin counts down from October 1, 1988 - then a tagged ghoul surfaced in the Soviet of the USSR.
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 4 December 2015 00: 18
      0
      Thanks for the answer. Now it’s clear, I agree. Somewhat more often there is the number 22 (hereinafter referred to as Grandfather Kostya). In the old newsreels, praise of this labeled one happens. Somehow he managed to fool people. Because, as they say, everyone believed that everything was good. Understanding came later than what he had done. And much later people found out about the territorial damages. ?? Already, probably, when the EBN left. And it is not clear the recent praises of EBN and falsehood ?? or a lie? ? in the assessment of the 90s.
  27. Balamyt
    Balamyt 3 December 2015 22: 58
    +3
    Our prime minister, for so many years on the first roles, has been dancing, but there has been no trust in him either! Taxes, ... excise taxes .., fees ....., tariffs ............... And then you can die for free ????
  28. severbob
    severbob 3 December 2015 23: 09
    +1
    written a lot of little sense
  29. tokens2
    tokens2 3 December 2015 23: 15
    +3
    The global crisis is evolving by the fact that there is
    global crisis of ideas.
    Behind every soap bubble in the economy lies an idea. A frequent idea is camouflaged by deception.
    And this "camouflage" is becoming more and more.
    No ideas! There was only total deception. All and all.
    No, of course, you can pump up millions of people with drugs. Listen to what they’re talking about. Behind the wall laughing but this is also a hoax.
    New ideas can be too "sensitive" for the masters of this world.
    This is all byad.
    But the realization of this is already progress for many.
    It is difficult to move away from the stereotype-the hero will build a foundation for everyone. The collective efforts of everyone are needed. And the authorities and people.
    As well as people in power corridors laughing
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 3 December 2015 23: 46
      +2
      Lexey2

      You are close to the truth. A bit simplistic, but generally correct.
      1. tokens2
        tokens2 4 December 2015 00: 13
        0
        Lexey2

        You are close to the truth. A bit simplistic, but generally correct.

        Try to "package" the truth with the same number of signs. As I think you will succeed.
        Punctuation marks can not be put. laughing
        Everything in this world is simple. The main "focus" is at the end of the focus.
        And the chain does not change. Only the names of the "chains" change.
        Sincerely.
  30. grandfather_Kostya
    grandfather_Kostya 3 December 2015 23: 18
    +4
    The best Constitution, as, for example, in many countries of Latin America, is an empty ringing without infrastructure, because without it no rights can be guaranteed.
    The Constitution is the basic rules of the game, which are not in our favor for the last 22 years. First of all, you need to change the rules of the game and set a new, distant, attractive goal (like “building communism,” for example), and not just “fill your belly as best you can” without any ideologies - this is not a goal at all! I think there will be a group of competent specialists to rewrite the "disgrace of the '93 model" without Soros consultants. And on the basis of a ready-made agreed document, it is possible to start moving in a new direction.
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 3 December 2015 23: 52
      +1
      Grandfather_Kostya

      Yes, the constitution is an empty ring without a state preserving them.

      But the absurdity lies also in the fact that in the constitution you are handing YOUR RIGHTS to dose someone else.

      Thus we come to a strange conclusion. What would be nice to receive in the constitution the duties of a citizen. But through his duties, each citizen will take his rights himself. This statement of mine looks very wild. But logic is present.
  31. saygon66
    saygon66 3 December 2015 23: 27
    +5
    - Our bureaucratic apparatus has the psychology of intestinal parasites: Suck the body that has "sheltered" them dry and die with it! There is only one difference - they expect to "dump" from the dying organism with the last bowel movement ...
    - Such disgusting analogies are suggesting themselves ...
    1. 34 region
      34 region 4 December 2015 00: 01
      +1
      What are the analogies? This is the prose of life! Brevity is the soul of wit! You are a plus!
  32. afrikanez
    afrikanez 4 December 2015 00: 29
    0
    To begin to act not in order to earn more individually, but in order to maintain and improve our common life
    Auto RU. this is all you need to tell Abramovich. Chubais and others ... maybe it will affect them. The country is completely robbed several times, it is unlikely to care about the common interest. When there are so many parasites around.
  33. skeptic31
    skeptic31 4 December 2015 00: 35
    +1
    Everything seems to be correct, but it is painfully naive. It seems that the author knows something about liberals, oligarchs and officials that we don’t know about. The process is underway, in full swing, but not in the direction that the author writes about. Now it’s not about turning in the right direction, but at least stopping the “reformers”. In any case, everyone understands perfectly, and they, including, are not, that their "reforms" will not be better for us. They don’t want us to be better ...
  34. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 4 December 2015 03: 59
    +1
    The idea that the United States and its sixes are destroying those countries from which you can pump oil for free and use resources is true! It is now clear that the oil countries are suffering. And Syria has opened gratuitous oil for someone. Ukraine, the most powerful chernozems in Europe, is also being pressed by Donbass. It’s impossible to become insolent. It’s obvious what problems the states are experiencing and it simply became impossible for them ... they can be finished off just selling nothing. They themselves will bend.
  35. Zomanus
    Zomanus 4 December 2015 04: 02
    0
    In the field of production support, it is necessary to switch to non-cash.
    That is, payment for kindergartens, schools, hospitals, housing should be made by bank transfer.
    Otherwise, the growth of salaries in production will automatically entail
    the rise in prices for foodstuffs and the increase in the price of rental housing, transportation and other things.
    A working person should be guaranteed a standard of living and services sufficient to
    so that he would not think about where to be treated, where to find money for renting housing and so on.
    And control at such costs is easier.
  36. Jozhkin Cat
    Jozhkin Cat 4 December 2015 04: 34
    +2
    And what suggestions will be? To the barricades? well, why the heck so ..
    It is interesting how Comrade Stalin would act in such a situation?)) What will be the proposals?
  37. STN
    STN 4 December 2015 06: 00
    +1
    It seems that everyone knows this. And what depends on the little man? On whom it depends, everyone has been tied up with blood and money since the 90s, no one digs. And it’s scary to dig, one will flood everyone with him. Again gangster redistribution will be. But someday, they all will go into another world slowly. So the substitution will take place, the heirs will no longer be tied with blood ...
  38. sledge
    sledge 4 December 2015 07: 41
    0
    Yeah, not everything is as simple as it seems.
  39. Alex66
    Alex66 4 December 2015 10: 34
    +1
    "What difference does it make what color the cat is, if it doesn't catch mice? - You need to drown such cats."
    And why should our cats catch mice, if everything is all right with them, the owner does not mind their souls, and we put up with mice. Another such a cat has long ago kicked her ass and into the forest to learn how to catch mice, while our teachers write her everything she hopes. And his cat will die of hunger, and his mouse and rats will be taken away. Although our owner is not bad for others, he gives good advice to cats, and it helps to drive mice with rats.
  40. Concealer
    Concealer 4 December 2015 10: 36
    0
    Meanwhile, everything is quite simple. First of all, it is necessary to modernize the infrastructure: this will not only give a reduction in costs and a jump in business activity, it will give freedom.

    Not as simple as it seems. If this were possible, then the global business itself would be engaged in the modernization of infrastructure. But no, and there are reasons for that.
    Within the existing economic paradigm, modernization is not possible. Impossible, since such modernization inevitably changes the very foundations of social production. Scientific and technological development has led to a line beyond which the industrial production that we are accustomed to becomes economically disadvantageous. It is unprofitable to own modern machines and equipment. They no longer make a profit, since the bulk of the cost of production is now intellectual labor.
    And this must be taken as a fact. Accept, and prepare for a change in social production and the economic model.
    They are right: the state makes everything worse than private business. But this is only one side of the coin. The other side is simple: society itself cannot do much without which it cannot exist.

    And what actually prevents us from changing the production infrastructure of society so that the society itself is able to produce everything necessary. Why should the state deal with issues of social production? Society itself can do this if the state creates the necessary production infrastructure for society.
    Why not give the whole society free access to the means of production?
    And the main thing: the golden key to modernization is the separation of speculative capital from the rest of the economy. To make impossible a situation in which an attempt to build a barn turns around scrolling the relevant money in speculative markets with building a house in Switzerland instead. All developed countries at our level of maturity of the financial system with an iron wall, although by different methods, separated speculative money from the rest of the economy. Whoever did not do this, he simply did not become developed: otherwise development is impossible.

    Capital, by its nature, is generally a speculative thing, and cannot be otherwise. What are going to separate from what.
    No need to share anything. All capital today, like crazy, is rushing about in search of asylum. And what could be better and more reliable than state infrastructure projects. Real projects. Here you have the management of private business, and the modernization of infrastructure and state control.
    Therefore, the first step in healing is to end the omnipotence of people who consider statehood, including ours, a servant of global business.

    It is only a symptom, not the disease itself. Just like corruption. And to fight corruption, when the paradigm of any activity is "economic efficiency", and otherwise personal enrichment is simply meaningless. It is necessary to change the very development paradigm.
  41. Concealer
    Concealer 4 December 2015 10: 37
    +2
    And what is the main thing? And most importantly, these are people themselves, as the basis of any social production. And especially modern. Without a person, an economy is just a list of numbers, and infrastructure and production are just scrap.
    The sequence of necessary changes is simple and inevitable:
    1. Creation of infrastructure projects aimed at creating a raw material and production base for the participation of the whole society in production.
    2. Providing the whole society with free access to means of production on the basis of publicly available state infrastructure.
    3. Creation of a unified information base of technologies and scientific knowledge for free participation in the production of the whole society. Recognition of all technologies and scientific knowledge in the public domain.
    4. The accumulation of new production and scientific knowledge from the participation of the whole society in social production and the implementation of this knowledge and technologies in the new production infrastructure. Dissemination of technological and scientific knowledge in society.
    Today, the state requires a simple thing - the creation of a production and information infrastructure accessible to every member of society. And public-private partnerships are also an option. It is high time for big business to understand that at the current technical level of development, a return to capitalism is no longer possible. The share of intellectual labor in products has long been more than 70%, and it is already pointless to own machines and equipment. But you can still save capital for a while by placing them in the state infrastructure.
    And understanding can be accelerated by prohibiting the creation of existing legal entities "for the purpose of making profit. Let them choose specific and socially useful goals. This is not a crisis or depression, it is a change in the historical formation.
  42. blackenergy89
    blackenergy89 4 December 2015 11: 41
    +1
    I would recommend such a forecast to Ukraine but not Russia at all, but there are problems today, but they are not so serious, we have a strong and sovereign government, and the 5th and 6th columns are de-credited, so the Eurasian Union and the Brix Development Bank begin to work, which will provide us with cheap 5% loans unlike predatory 15% and we will get a big incentive in development, so I wouldn’t hold on to Russia
  43. 787nkx
    787nkx 4 December 2015 16: 29
    0
    The source of all ills is private big business.
    The largest owner should be only the state.
    But there is a contradiction, the main source of development is also large private capital.
    How to divide large private capital into smaller pools, how to effectively distribute them or transfer them to whom to transfer?
    I must admit that the liberal-economic idea failed in the Russian Federation, but there is no other clearly articulated idea.
    "Business must be socially oriented" is complete nonsense, it does not owe anyone anything, its task is to make a profit. Another thing is that the size of business and business participation should not exceed a certain level. Why in the city of 10 "Magnets" where to go 100 individual entrepreneurs who were squeezed out by large capital
    Our oligarchs are studying the Ukrainian experience and will certainly draw conclusions to strengthen their positions. Our state also needs to learn from the situation in Ukraine, but unfortunately I’m not sure that the conclusions will be correct.
    The presence of oligarchs is also beneficial for the state, in reality there are not so many of them, there are no more than 10 ultimate owners of the entire national property, it is much easier to agree with 10 people on an acceptable disposition and on its support than to agree with all citizens of the country.
    Whether the state will be able to break this vicious system is unlikely.
    The state authorities have no incentive to do this, but our people are fragmented, corrupted by consumerism and will not be able to clearly formulate their social request for power in the short historical period.