A detachment of Russian Pacific Fleet ships led by the Varyag missile cruiser entered the Indian Ocean

101
A detachment of Pacific Fleet ships, led by the Varyag missile cruiser, entered the Indian Ocean. According to the press service of the Pacific fleet, Russian ships will take part in the Indra Navy 2015 Russian-Indian naval exercises (Indra Navy-2015). In addition to the Varyag, the squad of ships includes: the destroyer Bystry, the rescue tugboat Alatau, and the tanker Boris Butoma. All ships of the Pacific Fleet successfully passed the Strait of Malacca and headed for the Indian port of Vishakhapatnam, where joint maneuvers of the fleets of the two countries will be officially opened.

A detachment of Russian Pacific Fleet ships led by the Varyag missile cruiser entered the Indian Ocean


TASS news agency reports that on the way to the Indian port, the Russian ships have completed the tasks of air defense warrants.

The official representative of the fleet Roman Martov:
During the fulfillment of the combat service tasks, the crews of the ships completed the tasks of the air defense of the warrant, training of the anti-terror unit, anti-ship maneuvers, operations of the ships for fighting for survivability and replenishment of stocks at sea.


A squad of Russian ships left Vladivostok on November 2 and during the transition managed to conduct several exercises of various orientations, including anti-piracy maneuvers in the area of ​​the Malacca Strait, where numerous pirate groups are operating, keeping the merchant ships in these waters at bay.
  • http://function.mil.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

101 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    2 December 2015 14: 29
    Are you planning to enter the Mediterranean Sea?
    There is work for the entire order. Yes, and GRKR "Moscow" company should be made!
    1. Darkoff
      +12
      2 December 2015 14: 31
      Perhaps Moscow will be changed.
      She has been on duty there for a long time. Yes, and in the Black Sea it would be necessary to return, while there is an opportunity to slip through the Turkish Straits.
      1. +8
        2 December 2015 14: 40
        The Varyag missile cruiser is an analogue of the Moskva. But like any missile cruiser of this type comes as part of escort ships.
        However, acting in conditions of limitation of the sea area by the coastline (for example, the Mediterranean Sea), it becomes vulnerable to coastal guns (complexes), and mainland aviation.
        1. +1
          2 December 2015 15: 07
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          The Varyag missile cruiser is an analogue of the Moskva.

          If we compare the US destroyer Arly Burke and the cruiser of the Glory project, we get the following:
          Anti-aircraft missiles: SM-2 and S-300 for 64 missiles (typical loading of missiles SM-2/6 64 missiles)
          Anti-theft missiles: 8 Harpoons in inclined launchers at Burke (and not all of them, modern destroyers do not have inclined launchers) and 16 P-1000 Volcano at Moscow. The RRM LRASM rocket adapted for the Mk-41 UVP is still being tested.
          Burke missiles for striking ground targets at 26 tomahawks Moscow has no such missiles
          Rocket torpedoes: Burke has 6 Asrok-type torpedoes in Moscow; 10 torpedo tubes that can use RPK-6M Waterfall
          1. +3
            2 December 2015 16: 17
            Correcting the lieutenant of the Air Force: on the Orly Burke type EM URO there is a vertical launch device in the amount of 96 (in the previous series 90) and you can load them as you wish, but the typical load is as follows: 8 BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missiles, 8 anti-submarine missiles guided missiles RUM-139 VL-Asroc, 74 missiles RIM-66 SM-2, 24 missiles RIM-7 Sea Sparrow (four per cell) ... and there is no more missile weapons. And there are no 26 Tomahawks either.
          2. 0
            2 December 2015 19: 07
            Volcano - shot of a battleship.
            Harpoon - a shot of a cruiser, ordinary, not heavy.
            Close in power and range to harpoons - the 48N6 missile of the S-300F EMNIP complex, of which "Moscow" has 64 pieces
      2. +27
        2 December 2015 14: 44
        Quote: DarkOFF
        Perhaps Moscow will be changed.
        She has been on duty there for a long time. And it would have to be returned to the Black Sea, as long as it is possible to slip through the Turkish Straits.


        Yesterday in VESTI DOC I heard how in the 90s the Turks decided to "show their teeth" and not let "Moscow" through the straits! We set up three ships on the course of "Moscow"! Our commander decided to uncover something there ... in a few minutes the fairway was clear, and there were no enemy ships nearby! I suppose that now, when trying to close the straits, it will be about the same!
        1. mvg
          +7
          2 December 2015 14: 52
          Even if the whole team goes on deck and "uncovers", this number will not work ... hi
          But your idea is interesting.
          1. +1
            2 December 2015 15: 40
            Quote: mvg
            Even if the whole team goes on deck and "uncovers", this number will not work ...
            But your idea is interesting.

            I’m not sure at that time the Turkish ships wanted to startle, 16 P-1000 Vulcan missiles would be 1000% enough to sink those ships that blocked the path, in turn, the Moscow cruiser has 64 S-300 + Osa-M missiles and anti-aircraft machine guns, the Turkish Air Force would have to try very hard to destroy the class Moscow cruiser.
            1. mvg
              +1
              2 December 2015 16: 22
              The 1164 Moskva, to put it mildly, has very limited air defense capabilities. On paper, Fort and 64 48H6 rockets look very powerful. Osu-M, let's not count. I studied it for 6 years .. I roughly know what and who can be scared by it.
              Really firing no more than 3 targets at ranges up to 90 km. Harpoon has 120 and 180 km. The F4E link will be enough for this guards cruiser. And yet, there is no more air defense in the middle-earth.
              And the P-1000 Volcanoes can be kept "for themselves." Moreover, there is clearly a couple with special warheads.
              PS: There is no PLO on the cruiser either, there was a phrase somewhere that he (the cruiser) will hear the 209 draft only if the drunken Turks emerge directly below him for an evening prayer ..
              BOD 1155 will "leave" after Moscow within the same 20-30 minutes.
              During 080808 in the Black Sea Fleet, a "battle" was simulated with the "Orly Burk" located there at that time .. Moscow, the Mirage and the patrol ship were conditionally destroyed.

              There, down the OPUS branch, I drew an approximate composition of the Black Sea Fleet at that time. THAT is what then the Turks were afraid of ..
              1. 0
                2 December 2015 16: 36
                Osu-M let's not count

                Isn't it "Wasp" zakhe ... silt Georgian scows 08.08?
              2. -3
                2 December 2015 17: 36
                Quote: mvg
                During 080808 in the Black Sea Fleet, a "battle" was simulated with the "Orly Burk" located there at that time .. Moscow, the Mirage and the patrol ship were conditionally destroyed.

                You want to say that 8 !!! enough harpoons to sink the cruiser Moscow? S-300 at its 90 kilometers will detect and hit these harpoons.
        2. -2
          2 December 2015 15: 06
          Not "something there," but, as it was said, the main caliber, ie AK-130.
          1. +1
            2 December 2015 15: 36
            Quote: spravochnik
            Not "something there," but, as it was said, the main caliber, ie AK-130.

            The main caliber is 16 launchers with missiles P-1000 Volcano.
          2. +1
            2 December 2015 15: 37
            Quote: spravochnik
            Not "something there", аas said main caliber, i.e. AK-130.


            That's right, the main caliber ...

            It will be necessary, - and the starpom will call for help ...
          3. -1
            2 December 2015 16: 04
            maybe you messed up? AK 630 !!!
          4. mvg
            0
            2 December 2015 18: 43
            Isn't it "Wasp" zakhe ... silt Georgian scows 08.08?

            Somehow, at the dawn of the rocket era, the United States had such an RIM-8 Talos air defense system, with a vigorous warhead. So he could, foolishly, and take the cruiser .. not that 080808 scow genatsvale ..
            Remember the proverb about the balalaika?
            Or the film "Solitary Voyage", there, too, the American squadron was "frightened" by "Wasp" ...
          5. 0
            2 December 2015 22: 13
            Well, the woman is excusable, and it was not worth it to focus on this. I am also a land man, and for me a lot in the maritime business, a Chinese letter.
        3. -1
          2 December 2015 15: 07
          I bet +, but still this is a naval bike ...
        4. -1
          2 December 2015 15: 35
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          Our commander decided to uncover something there... I think that now, when you try to close the straits, it will be about the same!


          Uncover, be sure to uncover ... And show ... the Turks ... where the crayfish hibernate ...
        5. +1
          2 December 2015 16: 04
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          in the 90s the Turks decided to "show their teeth" and not let "Moscow" through the straits! We set up three ships on the course of "Moscow"! Our commander decided to uncover something there ... in a few minutes the fairway was clear, and there were no enemy ships nearby!

          At one time, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR A.A. Gromyko, responding to the threat of the Turks to close the straits, said: "... for the passage in the Mediterranean, the Black Sea Fleet will need only a couple of missile volleys, as a result of which, in addition to the Bosphorus, there will be two more , alas, there will be no Istanbul. "
      3. +12
        2 December 2015 14: 53
        what Russia has come to. in order to have time to slip through. in order to have time to beg forgiveness from the Turks. in order to have time to sell gas at a bargain price it’s still possible ... damn it, it’s a pity that there are no politicians in Russia like Stalin when he entered !
        1. -3
          2 December 2015 15: 58
          Yeah, like that-- you’re on my face, but I won’t buy your tomatoes ... I’ve spent half a day with Georgia, but I decided on an adequate answer, I missed the moment with the Turks .., so it’s possible to slip through , as if again, something unexpected not to get, a shaman or something they took to the General Staff, like an analyst ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
      4. +3
        2 December 2015 14: 57
        Quote: DarkOFF
        Perhaps Moscow will be changed.
        She has been on duty there for a long time. Yes, and in the Black Sea it would be necessary to return, while there is an opportunity to slip through the Turkish Straits.

        Do you seriously assume that the Turks can close the Bosphorus? Then you definitely have to fight seriously.
        It seems that the world certainly will not do without the third world.
        But then you will not have to leave the geyropa. As always done.
        They won and left. But the mattress-beds do not win, they come and stay forever, they push the dead presidents to everyone. With Geyropa it seems impossible otherwise.
        And drown the mattress to hell, a good volcano to wake them up.
        1. 0
          2 December 2015 15: 31
          Quote: Sterlya
          Do you seriously assume that the Turks can close the Bosphorus?
          And that the Turks could shoot down our plane, no one seriously expected until the recent events. How international treaties are "respected" and NATO's right has made it clear to us since the time of the bombing of Serbia (Operation Merciful Angel). last century. Excuse me, but I deeply hope that our headquarters take into account such a "force majeure" and have an algorithm for countering conventional weapons. Otherwise it would not be worth sending our people to the Mediterranean.
          1. 0
            2 December 2015 17: 08
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            Quote: Sterlya
            Do you seriously assume that the Turks can close the Bosphorus?
            And that the Turks could shoot down our plane, no one seriously expected until the recent events. How international treaties are "respected" and NATO's right has made it clear to us since the time of the bombing of Serbia (Operation Merciful Angel). last century. Excuse me, but I deeply hope that our headquarters take into account such a "force majeure" and have an algorithm for countering conventional weapons. Otherwise it would not be worth sending our people to the Mediterranean.

            Although yes. From this chock. Moreover, with the support of NATO, something else can be expected. Behind everything, of course, is the United States as an exporter of dead presidents.
            The ruble is falling. So the United States is in the black. Everything is simple. And nothing to do with the US economy. All of us depends on the export of dead presidents. Otherwise, they have a polar fox, without these dead.
        2. 0
          2 December 2015 15: 38
          Quote: Sterlya
          But then you will not have to leave the geyropa.



          A good idea ... But for its implementation, this Europe needs to be tipped ...
          1. 0
            2 December 2015 17: 10
            Quote: veksha50
            Quote: Sterlya
            But then you will not have to leave the geyropa.



            A good idea ... But for its implementation, this Europe needs to be tipped ...

            Bend for the last time. Not in the first?
            These always thought Russia was weak. That colossus is some, that. se
      5. 0
        2 December 2015 15: 17
        Quote: DarkOFF
        . Yes, and in the Black Sea it would be necessary to return, while there is an opportunity to slip through the Turkish Straits.

        Why is this sadness? After all, in the next article you defeated the Turks with your comments ... wassat
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. +1
        2 December 2015 16: 03
        Quote: DarkOFF
        Yes, and in the Black Sea it would be necessary to return, while there is an opportunity to slip through the Turkish Straits.

        Any problems???
    2. +4
      2 December 2015 14: 32
      It is planned.
    3. +2
      2 December 2015 14: 40
      All ships of the Pacific Fleet successfully passed the Strait of Malacca and headed for the Indian port of Vishakhapatnam, where joint maneuvers of the fleets of the two countries will be officially opened.

      With "training" shooting in the Syrian region? wink
    4. mvg
      +3
      2 December 2015 14: 49
      What job? Guards die?
      Do you know that the Mediterranean squadron, even during the times of the mighty USSR and the Department of Internal Affairs, was the first to die? And she was more interesting than "Varyag" and "Fast", both in their fourth decade .. Have pity on the old people. They would have gone to the Indian without serious problems.
      Would you like to bet that after this hike, "Fast" will get up for repairs?
      1. 0
        2 December 2015 17: 15
        Quote: mvg
        What job? Guards die?
        Do you know that the Mediterranean squadron, even during the times of the mighty USSR and the Department of Internal Affairs, was the first to die? And she was more interesting than "Varyag" and "Fast", both in their fourth decade .. Have pity on the old people. They would have gone to the Indian without serious problems.
        Would you like to bet that after this hike, "Fast" will get up for repairs?

        Why bet it right away? And so it is clear that it’s like retiring to run a marathon.
    5. Tor5
      0
      2 December 2015 14: 50
      Maybe right - a replacement for "Moscow"? And the teachings are for a diversion.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +4
      2 December 2015 14: 58
      Sailors of the cruiser "Moscow" off the Syrian coast greeted the sailors of the American destroyer with the anthem of Russia.
    8. 0
      2 December 2015 15: 01
      It remains only to wish the team 7 pounds under the keel!
    9. +2
      2 December 2015 15: 12
      begins! maybe? and should ? the site has become, _ Kindergarten! got your guesses! Why do you need to know this ?!!!
    10. 0
      2 December 2015 15: 31
      Learning is light! As they say. =)
  2. -2
    2 December 2015 14: 30
    do not want to walk to Syria
    1. -1
      2 December 2015 14: 49
      They will take a walk, although the sailors are still themselves, do not know for what purpose, but they will go to Mediterranean. Most likely they will really replace "Moscow".
  3. +9
    2 December 2015 14: 30
    anti-piracy maneuvers in the area of ​​the Strait of Malacca, where numerous pirate groups operate

    At that time, the pirates worked out maneuvers on how to hide themselves somewhere while warships pass.
    1. +1
      2 December 2015 14: 44
      Quote: Vladimirets
      anti-piracy maneuvers in the area of ​​the Strait of Malacca, where numerous pirate groups operate

      I agree, it is a little incorrectly written. I imagine a picture: a pirate bot is approaching a missile cruiser, and it begins to maneuver!
  4. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 32
    ViVa Russia!
  5. -7
    2 December 2015 14: 33
    so that the Turks immediately drown them all there?
    the Turkish fleet is 5 times stronger than the Black Sea. and this is only the Turkish fleet, not counting the whole NATO
    thanks to the "reformers"
    and there’s nowhere to build new ships for the Black Sea Fleet - thanks to the mergers who merged Nikolaev with his shipyards
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 14: 35
      Quote: azesm
      the Turkish fleet is 5 times stronger than the Black Sea.

      Count the total salvo of C-300F of Moscow and Varyag. Plus the volcano. Plus the fact that our submarines can shoot from under water. And do not deregister the Caspian flotilla.
      And also the Bastions and other nyashki coastal troops KChF. Yes, and attack aircraft and bombers are based on the airfields of Crimea.
      1. 0
        2 December 2015 14: 51
        the Turkish fleet is 5 times stronger than the Black Sea. and this is only the Turkish fleet, not counting the whole NATO
        thanks to the "reformers"

        Think very narrowly, the Black Sea Fleet aviation repeatedly covers all their "power", I generally keep quiet about the coastal complexes.
        RIA Novosti with reference to the latest Global Firepower Index data. This rating is considered one of the most famous and reputable research in the world.

        The study takes into account indicators such as the size of the army, ground systems, air forces, the Navy, the production and consumption of resources in the country, the country's transport infrastructure, financial resources, as well as geographical features.

        Russia in this ranking takes the second position after the United States. Turkey ranks 10th after China, India, Britain, France, South Korea, Germany and Japan.

        With a total population of 142,47 million people, Russia can mobilize more than 69 million people, Turkey - 41,6 million. At the same time, 15 398 tanks (3 from Turkey), 778 armored personnel carriers (31 from Turkey), 298 self-propelled guns (versus 7), 550 multiple launch rocket systems (versus 5) are in service in Russia.

        More than three times Russia surpasses Turkey in the number of Air Force units –3 versus 429, as well as the Navy — Russia currently has 1 units, and Turkey only 020.
        1. mvg
          0
          2 December 2015 14: 57
          If it's not a secret, what do you mean by "Black Sea Fleet aviation"? Two dozen Su-24s? Or, somewhere in the underground vaults, the Death Star is quietly waiting in the wings?
          And it is very difficult to scare the Turkish fleet, a couple of Orli Burkov with the "BAL" and "Bastion", and the Romanians will put up something too ..
          1. +1
            2 December 2015 15: 11
            If it's not a secret, what do you mean by "Black Sea Fleet aviation"? Two dozen Su-24s? Or, somewhere in the underground vaults, the Death Star is quietly waiting in the wings?

            Child to God! two dozen SU-24s with anti-ship missiles can attack without entering the air defense zone of their fleet, bombers are covered not only from Crimean airfields, but from Krymsk and Kushchevskaya airfields ... I’ll just shut up about 30 anti-submarine helicopters ... + this will strengthen everything You can transfer from the SF, Pacific Fleet during the day ... you are my friend just naive ... again, I’m thinking broader
            1. mvg
              -4
              2 December 2015 15: 23
              Child to God! two dozen SU-24s with RCC suspension can attack without entering the air defense zone of their fleet, bombers are covered not only from Crimean airfields, but from Krymsk and Kushchevskaya airfields ... I'm just silent about 30 anti-submarine helicopters

              Well, that's better and be silent. And at your leisure, so as not to look like an idiot and an urapatriot, spend your precious time and try to find at least one aviation anti-ship missile (which has been adopted) in service with Russia.
              What will we drown? And 30 anti-submarine helicopters are a force .. Already knees knock. And the radius of their action? And how much can fly up? And which submarines carry torpedoes? And this despite the fact that the Black Sea theater will be under NATO control ..
              Maybe it's better to turn on the TV show "Star" and grunt with delight?
              1. +1
                2 December 2015 15: 38
                that is, the X-35 for you is no longer RCC (with a range of 200 km), did you hear anything about the TU-22MZ in the fleet specially sharpened for this purpose?
                1. mvg
                  0
                  2 December 2015 16: 42
                  http://topwar.ru/76289-protivokorabelnaya-raketa-h-35.html
                  This is about Uranium and its aviation version ..

                  About Tu-22M3 in Simferopol, I already wrote that as soon as possible .. In the sense that as soon as the airfield is ready to receive, both Tu22, Tu142 and Il will immediately arrive. In the meantime, the Su-24, and helicopters. There is a planned replacement for the Su-30SM. Only the Su-30SM is not able to work on surface targets.
                  Tu22M3 was "sharpened, sharpened" and not sharpened ...
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. -4
              2 December 2015 16: 03
              Quote: Rostovchanin
              two dozen SU-24 with a suspension of anti-ship missiles


              Comrade .. And you are generally in the subject of anti-ship missiles for the SU-24?




              X-66 and X-23 (NATO - AS-7 Kerry) tactical guided air-to-surface missiles with a maximum launch range of about 10 km
              X-25 (AS-10 Karen) maximum launch range of 7-10 km, X-25MP (40 km)
              X-59 "Gadfly" (AS-13 Kingbolt) / FOR visually detectable targets by the operator, shopping mall TKSN "Tekon-1" / 45km, X-59MK (X-59A) up to 285km ... (bad luck, there are none)


              USE
              Quote: Rostovchanin
              without entering the air defense zone of their fleet,

              Oh well....
              Sure TCG Büyükada (F-512)


              processing systems:
              GENESIS CMS (BIUS)
              SMART-S Mk2 search radar (radar No. 1)
              Sonar, GPS, LAN, ECDIS
              UniMACS 3000 IPMS (radar number 2)
              X-band radar, Fire control radar (radar No. 3)
              has only 21 × RAM (PDMS) RIM-116 (Sidewinder AIM-9 child) up to 10 km ...
              and F-497TCG "Göksu"

              already 32x RIM-66 Standard (SM-1) (up to 167 km) and radar AN / SPS-49, AN / SPS-55

              well and the F-247 TCG KEMAL

              12x RIM-162 Evolved SeaSparrow Missile (ESSM) (Range 50+ km)
              --------------------------------
              The Navy is far from dead
              1. -2
                2 December 2015 16: 15
                Comrade .. And you are generally in the subject of anti-ship missiles for the SU-24?

                And where did you get that information on this should be in the public domain? Judging by the number of videos posted, you stupidly believe YouTube, i.e. what Halwood creates ... well, well ...
                1. -1
                  2 December 2015 16: 31
                  Quote: Rostovchanin
                  Judging by the number of videos posted, you stupidly believe YouTube

                  stupidly believe in something you. I practically held all the products in my hands
                  I watch videos, often myself, they send a lot (links), what’s shameful here?


                  Movie, at least some argument,and any more weighty arrogant stupid statement
                  Type: (calculated on +)
                  Quote: Rostovchanin
                  Child to God! two dozen SU-24 with a suspension, anti-ship missiles can attack not entering the air defense zone of their fleet,


                  Quote: Rostovchanin
                  Think very narrowly aviation of the Black Sea Fleet repeatedly covers all their "power",


                  Quote: Rostovchanin
                  those. what Halwood creates ... well, well ...

                  Well, brag about what "Mosfilm" or CC "Zvezda" creates
                  WELL?
        2. +1
          2 December 2015 15: 34
          352 versus 115 is "very urapatriotic", but absolutely not true!
          If there is an actual "batch" with the Turks, then "God forbid" we at least a hundred from 4 fleets of combat-ready ships (together with SSBNs and SSGNs) to scrape together, not to mention, at the right time to focus them on the Mediterranean theater of operations! Yes, this whole armada is also it is necessary to provide fuel, ammunition, etc., etc., etc.
          If everything was so "rosy" with our aircraft, then the reaction to the Su-24 would not be limited to tomatoes and tourists ...
        3. +5
          2 December 2015 15: 34
          Quote: Rostovchanin
          Think very narrowly, the Black Sea Fleet aviation repeatedly covers all their "power",

          ?
          43rd Marine Assault Aviation Regiment (Saki). (Su-24, Su-30SM): TWO squadrons - Su-24 and Su-24MR. In early January, the first THREE Su-30SM (and TWO) were transferred to the regiment.

          318th Mixed Aviation Regiment (Kacha). (An-26, Ka-27PS / PL / 29, Be-12): four Be-12s taken from storage and repaired in Taganrog, UAV Orlan-10 regiment

          At the Belbek airport, the 38th fighter aviation regiment is stationed. It consists of two squadrons with aircraft Su-27SM3, Su-30M2, Su-27P, Su-27UB

          TURKEY (and this for 2009, not 2015):
          THIRD NATO Air Force !!!!

          34 an aerodrome with an artificial runway, including one with a runway longer than 3 m, one -000 m, eight from 2 to 500 m and one up to 900 m, as well as six helipads.
          1 and 2 SO. In total, there are 21 aviation squadrons (ai) in it: eight fighter-bomber, seven fighter air defense, two reconnaissance and four combat training + 11 aux.
          more than 200 F-16C and D aircraft and about 200 F-4E and F-4F, and F-5.
          15th anti-aircraft missile base, which are in service with 72 launchers SAM "Nike-Hercules", 84 Rapira anti-aircraft missile systems and 704 anti-aircraft artillery (ZA) guns, Zipkin air defense systems (70 units) and Atylgan (78 units)

          early warning radar subsystem (Peace Eagle project) based on four AWACS aircraft and Boeing 737-700 aviation control (AWACS) (not in the know, have you already implemented it? Should have been in 2010)



          Quote: Rostovchanin
          , about coastal complexes generally silent.

          BC will only help for the defense of the coast, with the "liberation" of the straits and the action "forcing the peace take # 2" they are useless.
          1. -1
            2 December 2015 15: 51
            34 aerodromes with an artificial runway, including one with runways longer than 3 m, one -000 m, eight from 2 to 500 m and one up to 900 m, as well as six helipads.
            1 and 2 SO. In total, there are 21 aviation squadrons (ai) in it: eight fighter-bomber, seven fighter air defense, two reconnaissance and four combat training + 11 aux.
            more than 200 F-16C and D aircraft and about 200 F-4E and F-4F, and F-5.

            Do you think that only the fleet will fight? and their airfields and aviation will always be whole?
            31st Fighter Aviation Regiment — MiG-29, Su-30SM (Millerovo) (rearmament on the Su-30SM)
            3rd Guards Fighter Aviation Regiment - Su-27 (SM3 / S / P), Su-30M2, Ka-27 (Krymsk)
            960th assault aviation regiment - Su-25, Su-25SM (Primorsko-Akhtarsk)
            368th assault aviation regiment - Su-25, Su-25SM (Budennovsk)
            559th Bomber Aviation Regiment - Su-34 (Morozovsk)
            11th separate reconnaissance aviation regiment - Su-24MR (Marinovka)
            535th Separate Transport Combined Aviation Regiment - Tu-134, An-12, An-26, L-410 (Rostov)
            The 393rd Aviation Base of the Sevastopol Army Aviation, 2nd category - Mi-8, Mi-24, Mi-28N, Mi-35M, Ka-52 (Korenovsk)
            546th Army Aviation Base - Mi-8, Mi-24, Mi-26, Mi-28N, Mi-35M (Rostov)
            387th Army Aviation Base - Mi-8, Mi-24, Mi-28N, Mi-35M (Budennovsk)
            16th Army Aviation Brigade - Mi-8AMTSH, Mi-26, Mi-28, Mi-8 MTPR-1 (Zernograd)

            It’s just offhand, only one 4 army deployed in our South, not counting the Crimean airfields
            in the division 4 divisions S-300, 2 divisions S-400, 2 divisions Buk-M1:
            1537th Kuban anti-aircraft missile regiment Red Banner Regiment (Novorossiysk) - 1 S-300PM, 2 S-400;
            1721st anti-aircraft missile regiment (Novomikhaylovsky) - 2 "Buk" air defense missiles;
            1536th Anti-aircraft Missile Order of the Red Star Don Cossack Regiment (Rostov-on-Don) - 3th S-300PM;

            51th division of the same 4 air defense army again without Crimea
            and I’m indignant how the F-4 is put up as a super plane, and after all, most of them are armed with Turkey.
            1. 0
              2 December 2015 16: 22
              Quote: Rostovchanin
              and their airfields and aviation will always be whole?

              aviation will fight, the fleet will protect the straits and the coast. (This is an axiom for TVMS)
              Quote: Rostovchanin
              31st Fighter Aviation Regiment — MiG-29, Su-30SM (Millerovo) (rearmament on the Su-30SM)

              You already decide:
              Quote: Rostovchanin
              Black Sea Fleet aviation repeatedly covers all their "power

              or all the Russian Aerospace Forces.
              except for chocks, there are many more troubles:

              Quote: Rostovchanin
              and I’m indignant how the F-4 is put up as a super plane, and after all, most of them are armed with Turkey.

              208 or more F-16s (almost all Block50 +)

              the rest of the F-5


              (F-4E was in 2009 almost 7 years passed)

              F-4E is still quite, quite
          2. mvg
            0
            2 December 2015 19: 11
            early warning radar subsystem (Peace Eagle project) based on four AWACS aircraft and Boeing 737-700 aviation control (AWACS) (not in the know, have you already implemented it? Should have been in 2010)


            Boeing has supplied Turkey with the third Peace Eagle aircraft for early warning and control (AWACS). 11.09.14/XNUMX/XNUMX

            The plane arrived at Konya Air Force Base. This was announced by the Boeing company. The fourth AWACS aircraft is planned to be delivered to Turkey in 2015.

            In addition to the Boeing aircraft, Peace Eagle will supply ground support equipment, crew training equipment and technical support equipment.
        4. +9
          2 December 2015 16: 00
          Dear, you are probably an accountant ... Divide all the numbers you give by 5-10, especially with regards to the mob. resource, tanks, navy and get real numbers. Especially about the mob. resource pleased ... 69 million. What is this? The male population, including minors, pensioners, convicts, people with disabilities, drug addicts, draft dodgers, sons of bosses living in other countries, etc., etc. ??? Divide by 10 ...
          1. -1
            2 December 2015 16: 10
            Dear, you are probably an accountant ... Divide all the numbers you give by 5-10, especially with regards to the mob. resource, tanks, navy and get real numbers. Especially about the mob. resource pleased ... 69 million. What is this? The male population, including minors, pensioners, convicts, people with disabilities, drug addicts, draft dodgers, sons of bosses living in other countries, etc., etc. ??? Divide by 10 ...

            I gave you the assessment of one of the "respected" agencies, by the way there is a link to it, but where did you get the idea that their power cannot be divided by 10?
      2. mvg
        -2
        2 December 2015 15: 12
        Yesterday there was one person, said a good phrase. Just for you ..
        What is that type (quote):
        One must be patriots, but one cannot be stupid patriots.
        And stupid patriots do more harm than any liberals, cosmopolitans and traitors.

        Have you ever gathered where and whom to shoot? Yes, and all in a heap, and RCC, and SP and RBU ..
        It remains to add a cartridge, the one in the barrel of the 1st rank cap, to the second burst weight.
      3. 0
        2 December 2015 15: 21
        Quote: kostya-petrov
        Count the total volley S-300F of Moscow and Varyag.

        How can the S-300F help against the Turkish Navy?
        16 + 16 "Volcano" of course good
        Quote: kostya-petrov
        Plus the fact that our submarines can shoot from under water. And do not deregister the Caspian flotilla.

        Nuclear submarine?
        one diesel and one nuclear submarine in the Mediterranean Sea, one diesel submarine in the Black Sea

        Nothing will "fly" from the Caspian (ZM-14 cannot attack ships)

        Quote: kostya-petrov
        And also the Bastions and other nyashki coastal troops KChF.

        Where will the bastions from the Crimea get? up to 1/2 FM?
        For your information:
      4. -1
        2 December 2015 18: 11
        Quote: kostya-petrov
        other nyashki

        Here is the minus for this.
    2. msm
      msm
      +16
      2 December 2015 14: 38
      Tomorrow Putin must say: Everything, on such and such a date, a new countdown begins. It is forbidden to steal everyone. Who did not have time, he was late. We are not stealing anymore. Enough for us already ... This will be the case!
      1. +5
        2 December 2015 15: 02
        Quote: msm
        Tomorrow Putin must say: Everything, on such and such a date, a new countdown begins. It is forbidden to steal everyone. Who did not have time, he was late. We are not stealing anymore. Enough for us already ... This will be the case!

        Your words ... Our former governor Khoroshavin stole 3 lard with back-breaking labor in the governor's field! So his relatives filed a lawsuit! That all the wealth appropriated by hard work should be divided among family members and only Khoroshavin's share should be kept under arrest, and the rest should be returned to family members and relatives! Where is the guarantee that the judge will not come to an understanding with the poor and "unfairly" disadvantaged relatives? request
        1. +1
          2 December 2015 15: 47
          It is high time to issue a license for a "warning" to CheKists. I went to a jar of green stuff on the table and put "warned".
      2. 0
        2 December 2015 15: 04
        Quote: msm
        We are not stealing anymore. Enough for us already ...

        Enough is enough for you, but apparently they don’t have much ...
      3. 0
        2 December 2015 15: 07
        Quote: msm
        We are not stealing anymore. Enough for us already ... This will be the case!

        It would be cool...
    3. +2
      2 December 2015 14: 40
      Quote: AGAIN
      the Turkish fleet is 5 times stronger than the Black Sea

      ))) one volley of the GRK Moscow can, with a probability of 90%, completely drown the 2 / 3 of Turkey's most combat-ready surface vessels, and this does not take into account calibers, yachts and uranium ...
      1. +1
        2 December 2015 15: 00
        Well, you painted, not Moscow Regional Committee and Moscow, but the imperial death star is direct, why does it so vigorously awaken the Janissary pelvis to drown in such numbers?
        1. +1
          2 December 2015 15: 22
          Quote: kote119
          Well, you painted, not Moscow Regional Committee and Moscow, but the imperial death star is direct, why does it so vigorously awaken the Janissary pelvis to drown in such numbers?

          GRK Moscow with 16 supersonic anti-ship missiles Basalt.
          Turkish Navy Frigates of the type MEKO 200 frigate developed by the German shipbuilding campaign 8 pcs are the newest and 8 Perry Olives are ancient as a hafno mammoth, American vessels, which are damaged even by anti-aircraft missiles, they have nothing more to do, except for shallow submarines with a torpedo weapons)))
          1. -3
            2 December 2015 16: 20
            Nuuu ... from "space" it is certainly more visible, probably ...?
            Thank God that such "cosmonauts" are not hired by the General Staff, otherwise they would "have fought in delight already"!
          2. -1
            2 December 2015 16: 24
            1. Moscow cruiser is also old
            2. the Ottomans have a cool, well-balanced fleet, in which there are many relatively new ships, and very new
            3. their submarines are no worse than our dpl and they are slightly larger
            4.All this case is covered by a powerful air defense group, and aviation
            5. Ottomans to one degree or another can attract NATO resources
            6.
            Quote: SPACE
            American vessels that are damaged even by anti-aircraft missiles

            and our Moscow can’t be pushed through this business?
            7. How long is the Volcano enough?
            1. 0
              2 December 2015 19: 26
              1 Yeah, newer frigates like Oliver Perry.
              2 Ships of the second and third rank.
              3 Worse
              4 Powerful but very old.
              5 How are Georgians?
              6 In war as in war
              7 16 + 16 if the Varangian comes, in general, Volcanoes are against a more serious enemy, but they can be used because of their obsolescence, so to speak, to be used with benefit.
      2. mvg
        -4
        2 December 2015 15: 32
        What do you smoke? Share the supplier ... Also, sometimes, I want to escape from reality. And vodka is already tired ..
    4. -1
      2 December 2015 14: 42
      Quote: azesm
      and there’s nowhere to build new ships for the Black Sea Fleet - thanks to the mergers who merged Nikolaev with his shipyards

      Six TFRs of the 11356 project are under construction. Three are already lowered and are being tested.
      six patrol patrol ships of the 22160 project
      six RTOs of the 21631 project. Two are already in Sevastopol.
      six diesel-electric submarines of the 0636.3 project. Four are already taken by the fleet.
      Plus one more corvette of the 20385 project.
      1. -1
        2 December 2015 16: 29
        For the North, the Baltic and the Pacific Fleet, at least something would have been left ... Again, all in one heap "sofa" piled ...
    5. +6
      2 December 2015 14: 43
      What are you carrying??? What 5 times ??? What are you about??? If the total displacement is possible, but the combat potential is approximate parity with an advantage in our direction, and if we also take into account our coastal aviation with the transfer of Tu-22M3 to the Crimea, then the Turks can finally catch them ...
      1. mvg
        -4
        2 December 2015 15: 46
        You do not confuse Turkey with Georgia? Did the Tu22M3 really fly to Simferopol?
        At the Black Sea Fleet combat-ready 3-4 ships.
        121 GRK "Moscow", 810 TFR "Smetlivy",
        152 BOD "Nikolay Filchenkov", 713 BOD "Kerch",
        bark "Kruzenshtern", 156 BDK "Yamal", 615 RKVP "Bora", 059 MPK "Aleksandrovets",
        617 MRK "Mirage", 052 PSKR "Pearl", 913 minesweeper "Kovrovets", 952 missile boat "R-109".

        And BALLS and BASTIONS are, rather, protection from landing ships. For Berks, this is breakfast.
        1. +1
          2 December 2015 16: 28
          bpk "Kerch" seems to be decommissioned in 2014
      2. +2
        2 December 2015 16: 25
        Go to the Black Sea Fleet and say it "naval", if in the face after your words out of anger they will not give you, consider you "rattle" very lucky!
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +7
      2 December 2015 15: 00
      Turks warships with the flag of St. Andrew drowned and drowned mainly in their dreams, but in movies. A typical plot of a Turkish film about the Russian-Turkish war at sea: the sea, close-up - a sailing ship under the St. Andrew’s flag, teams in Turkish on almost the same sailing boat but under a red banner with a crescent. Gun salvos. Again close-up - fragments of a tree and St. Andrew's flag on the waves. Dreaming is not bad. But even being stronger in naval composition, the Turks will not go to an open confrontation with the Russian fleet - the gut is thin, they remember Ushakov and Spiridov no worse than us, they just hide it, and the Turkish intelligence group is probably more aware of the powerful grouping of Russian troops in Crimea ordinary Russian, even if he lives in the Crimea. But to arrange a provocation, and even with the approval of NATO and Washington - it is easy, the Turks with the occupation of Constantinople adopted the Byzantine treachery. The story of the Su-24 and the Turkish-European hysteria around it only confirms this.
      I have the honor.
    8. +2
      2 December 2015 15: 28
      Why is there nowhere to build? Yes, they lost Nikolaev. But Kerch and Feodosia were purchased. The Kerch plant Zaliv at one time built the BSCR pr.1135 ("Getman Sagaidachny" is their job) and has a dry dock, you can even build aircraft carriers.
      1. mvg
        0
        2 December 2015 18: 48
        Aircraft carriers? Probably small, the size of "Sagaidachny", and we will launch small, BUT marine quadrocopters in the pond .. which we will glue from designers sent by mail from China ..
    9. 0
      2 December 2015 16: 00
      Strength is not measured by displacement. According to the technical specifications, the Russian fleet is clearly stronger. Yes
  6. +3
    2 December 2015 14: 34
    Please tell me who knows. Are tugboats necessarily in this kind of squad? And as part of the carrier strike group, the mattresses also have a tug? I am not saying anything. I just ask the knowledgeable.
    1. +2
      2 December 2015 15: 04
      Yes, this is a real need, a long-range hike, old ships, there are no support points along the way. Navy mattresses all over the world.
    2. +1
      2 December 2015 15: 05
      Quote: axel320
      Please tell me who knows. Are tugboats necessarily in this kind of squad? And as part of the carrier strike group, the mattresses also have a tug? I am not saying anything. I just ask the knowledgeable.


      Required. "Alatau" rescue and towing vessel. It is also intended for extinguishing fires.

      The mattresses also have them in the AUG.
    3. +1
      2 December 2015 15: 10
      Americans have no SB in the warrant. And we have been present for some time, and often, unfortunately, they do not stand idle without work, because We often have problems with boiler turbine plants.
  7. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 35
    That's right! Syria and Turkey alone do not need to go in cycles! Russia must act everywhere! And with India and with China and walking off the coast of the USA.
  8. +1
    2 December 2015 14: 40
    Most likely, the group of our ships will most likely include Vashavyanka equipped with Caliber in order to keep the Turkish submarines in sight, and if a direct confrontation with Turkey starts, work on the ground targets of the Turks. And as I said, a destroyer near the Turkish border would not Apparently Varyag is going to replace Moscow, and a group under the flagship of this cruiser will strengthen the grouping of ships off the Syrian-Turkish coast.
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 15: 13
      Quote: NEXUS
      Most likely, the group of our ships probably includes Vashavyanka equipped with Caliber in order to keep ...

      If they are coming from Vladivostok, then atomic "Shuki" should accompany ...
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 48
    in Yemen, however, it would be necessary to glance, well, so replenish the supply of fresh water and something else to work out ...
  11. +2
    2 December 2015 14: 51
    In! They haven’t shot from the Indian ... We are waiting !!! fellow
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +2
    2 December 2015 15: 27
    About the Turks and their roles in world history:

  14. 0
    2 December 2015 15: 31
    Interesting ... Caliber from Vishakhapatnam to the Turkish border will fly? winked
  15. 0
    2 December 2015 15: 40
    In fact, I never tire of being surprised at the "tolerance" of the Indians ...

    Weapons are being bought - all kinds of things ...

    Joint exercises with whom they just do not conduct ...

    A thought creeps in: do they have any kind of geopolitical interests and goals?
    1. +3
      2 December 2015 15: 58
      "Do they [Indians] have any geopolitical interests and goals at all?" ////

      To have a geopolitical goal is not to quarrel with everyone and
      rely only on your army.
      Wise states enter into the widest possible alliances or
      cooperate with as many states as possible.
      Then, in any situation, someone will help and
      you can continue to trade with someone.
      1. mvg
        -1
        2 December 2015 16: 57
        don't mean to quarrel with everyone and
        rely only on your army.
        Wise states enter into the widest possible alliances or
        cooperate with as many states as possible.
        Then, in any situation, someone will help and
        you can continue to trade with someone.

        I know that not all Jews are equally good. But these are good words.
        Better than Russia - the navel of the Earth and we will all blame ..
  16. -1
    2 December 2015 16: 05
    And get it from the Indian Ocean, if necessary ....))
  17. -2
    2 December 2015 16: 29
    ... As a preventive measure - with "poplars", "maces" in the bases and capitals of NATO countries - preemptive .., but not nuclear - to subtract, retouch the remains ... Maybe then the world will become more adequate ...
  18. -1
    2 December 2015 16: 32
    Well, at least "Moscow" to change at the post, and then - bread! Everyone (almost) writes here about a possible confrontation between the RRC and the Turkish fleet. It seems to me, nevertheless, that our sailors are real heroes in the full sense of the word, because they understand that if everything starts "seriously" they have almost no chance of staying alive. It's my opinion. Although, maybe I'm wrong. I would very much like to be mistaken here. hi
    1. +1
      2 December 2015 17: 37
      Everything may not look like rotation, but like exposing your flanks in front of the enemy pretending to be asleep. History has shown more than once that agreements on friendship and non-aggression are always a reason to violate them in the near future. Nobody wants to see Russia not only strong and developing, but even just calm. Too "tidbit" for almost all countries in the world. The line of "jackals" has already lined up.
  19. +2
    2 December 2015 18: 31
    History does not teach us anything !!! What idiot had the idea to send bombers without cover ???? .... this would not have happened, we expose ourselves. So it is with the "Moscow" - "poplar on ivy! There are worthy weapons, I do not argue, but it is designed for naval combat. And it is not clear how much" in one person "he can hold out against the same submarines ???? And where is the guarantee that our stupid heads will not make a "joke", as with the MIL. The war on the "couch" is certainly a serious thing, but the realities are much worse.
  20. +1
    2 December 2015 20: 32
    Played out Russia with arms sales. Aircraft, submarines, surface ships, tanks, etc., Just imagine nothing, and when you need to create a group, they themselves have practically nothing. If only the slop fleet was shaken, and even that had long been plundered by various metal workers. But then how many people at VO proved that they trade everything, profit is sacred! The State Department has done its job! Paid agents of influence. And our military now needs to think a few moves ahead and proceed from what we have. And to hell with all the concluded contracts. Who does not agree, excommunicate.
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 21: 08
      To proceed from the fact that we have this direct defeat in the confrontation. Because the technologies are equal for everyone, but in aggregate, Russia is not able to withstand everyone who is in the active phase of the confrontation and in the passive. This means that superiority can only be achieved with qualitatively new types of weapons, both in terms of power and efficiency. So those few who were still perceived as inventors with crazy ideas should be in demand. Of course, if there are any, they offer sound ideas.
      1. 0
        3 December 2015 05: 59
        All this is understandable, but TIME !!! We practically do not have it. Of course you should not sit back, you need to go to the end and do not spray. Do not squander created weapons. Export to India, what to water sand, nothing at all. This is for example.
  21. 0
    3 December 2015 10: 20
    Analyzing the developing events, one can observe such a state as before a street fight. The enemy is "less important". By their actions and statements, they show their insecurity. In short, no one takes responsibility for decisive action. They benefit from opposition, but at the same time they know what they can lose and would not want to upset the balance. The Americans, of course, provoke everyone to action, but not the Turks. no one else is capable of this determination. In general, everyone understands that they will not be able to win and "blitz krieg" will not work, and a long war for them is a collapse. Therefore, there is no time, but there is always that small period that stretches over many decades. This means that it is impossible to stop and it is necessary to speed up the development of precisely fundamental types of weapons. And than . Such a confrontation has always been an impetus for decisive actions by the elites to develop innovations that are not even paid attention to in peacetime.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"