Stoltenberg: The Washington Treaty's 5 article will be extended to hybrid attacks

56
The fifth article of the Washington Treaty (an attack on one of the NATO members is an attack on the alliance) can also be applied in the case of hybrid attacks, reports RIA News Jens Stoltenberg statement.



“We decided that hybrid attacks could also trigger the use of the 5 article,” said the Secretary General after the meeting of the Alliance Council at the ministerial level.

According to him, the difficulty lies in the fact that hybrid attacks are usually not associated with any particular country, "they come from different regions of the world."

Stoltenberg said that Tuesday approved a "new concept of combating hybrid threats, which includes three components: preparation, deterrence and defense."

“We need to implement all these components. Hybrid challenges involve a very wide range of threats, and NATO needs a very wide range of capabilities to defend itself. Since, for example, hybrid attacks include misinformation and deception, the response time is very limited and therefore a very high degree of readiness of our forces is required, ”he added.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    2 December 2015 13: 33
    That is, who is not with us, is against us ... In other words, who thinks differently from Washington and Co., as well as opposes the imposition of American values, falls under this article and automatically becomes an enemy. Cunningly. Washington more and more clearly indicates its hypocritical and deceitful position, increasingly relying not on diplomacy, but on strength.
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 13: 39
      Kirdyk to us. Economic sanctions have been introduced against them, in the media we say that they are bad. Complete hybrid warfare. We must also come up with such a response and declare war.
      1. +2
        2 December 2015 13: 43
        Quote: Kil 31
        We must also come up with such a response and declare war.

        Stopudovo is already a concrete, obvious threat of war!
        Quote: Stoltenberg
        hybrid attacks include misinformation and deception, response time is very limited,
        Those. for any crap, such as "lies" (in their "opinion") will shoot ?!
        type: Look, if Th - "we have the right" to open fire to kill! Without warning!
        1. +2
          2 December 2015 13: 52
          hybrid attacks include misinformation and deception

          I didn’t think so, I farted there .... the whole war, the 5th article, all things.

          And to be honest, this is another, not realizable nonsense.
          1. +7
            2 December 2015 14: 03
            They give us Bolotnaya, and we are their Iskander. So what?
            1. +3
              2 December 2015 14: 24
              Quote: Stoltenberg:
              Article 5 of the Washington Treaty will be extended to hybrid attacks

              We are absolutely on the drum that there you are going to spread.

              The whole floor in the Security Service of Ukraine in Kiev is occupied by the demons, according to the Russian Aerospace Forces and their protection in Syria, American weapons are used, 25 years the West and the Turks are invested in destabilization in the North Caucasus.
            2. +1
              2 December 2015 14: 33
              From the text of the article
              Article 5 of the Washington Treaty (an attack on a NATO member is an attack on the alliance) can be applied in the case of hybrid attacks
              the difficulty is that hybrid attacks are usually not related to any particular country, "They come from different regions of the world."

              This suggests that the militant globalist Stoltenberg expands the Pentagon’s subjective rights around the world to promote the hegemony of the United States in establishing, maintaining and strengthening the “new world order” under the auspices of the United States for world domination, a handful of world bankers - modern financial globalist speculators.
              Again we come to the conclusion - global financial oligarchs-globalists need to know in person for the PERSONAL reflection of the threat of war on their part. For they will not calm down until nothing personally threatens their life! While they hope again, once again, during the next world war, to quietly and safely incognito sit out in some secluded corner of the globe.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. 0
              2 December 2015 15: 58
              Quote: Mahmut
              Hybrid challenges involve a very wide range of threats, and NATO needs a very wide range of capabilities to defend itself. Since, for example, hybrid attacks include misinformation and deception, the response time is very limited and therefore requires a very high degree of preparedness for our forces

              It turns out that Stoltenberg suggests the following:
              They swamp us, we wash ourselves, and they in response with axes and harpoons ...
              Dreaming!
              So far it has turned out differently:
              They are Pashtuns on us. and we are their Taliban, al-Qaeda, Igil ...
              Now they are us igilas, and we are their Parisians, Istanbul, Mali ... Assad, Hussite ...

              I think that Stoltenberg in reality very poorly understands what he is talking about.
              Hybrid war is about something else.
              The only full-fledged battle of this kind with all the attributes was in Ukraine.
              The result is unsatisfactory for everyone except the Crimeans, although even there some citizens have problems.
              Russia has lost Ukraine, Ukraine has lost Crimea and Novorossia, the west has lost the ability to wage hybrid wars on 1/6 of the land.
      2. 0
        2 December 2015 14: 12
        Do you want to grab the return line?
        1. +1
          2 December 2015 14: 26
          meaning of the picture
          1. 0
            2 December 2015 15: 14
            What do we care.
            1. 0
              2 December 2015 16: 29
              Ah, then it’s clear.
              1. 0
                2 December 2015 21: 06
                I’ll supplement us with pooh.
              2. 0
                2 December 2015 21: 08
                Otherwise, you can snatch, in full.
    2. +5
      2 December 2015 13: 41
      Uinya, show off cheap, shaking the air with cowards, the animal world is full of analogues. Kuzkina’s mother didn’t cure them, they would beg for him)))
    3. +3
      2 December 2015 13: 45
      infuriates this bespectacled wound
      1. 0
        2 December 2015 17: 39
        They do not think that they can fly. It is necessary for their citizens to talk more often about the consequences of nuclear and thermonuclear bombing, maybe then something will be cleared in the head.
      2. 0
        2 December 2015 17: 42
        They do not think that they can fly. It is necessary for their citizens to talk more often about the consequences of nuclear and thermonuclear bombing, maybe then something will be cleared in the head.
        1. 0
          2 December 2015 18: 05
          Quote: There are a lot of us
          They do not think that they can fly. It is necessary for their citizens to talk more often about the consequences of nuclear and thermonuclear bombing, maybe then something will be cleared in the head.

          and NATO does not recognize such explanations as a "hybrid war", such as intimidating the population, than bringing it, the population, to the calls for "peace-peace", and how they will give it with all their might. request
    4. +1
      2 December 2015 13: 48
      Quote: NEXUS
      In other words, who thinks differently from Washington and Co., as well as opposes the planting of American values, falls under this article and automatically becomes an enemy. Cunningly

      took from the article above ...))
      Why is the commotion? Yes, because the leading news agencies caused an artificial resonance, presenting, in general, an event that was ordinary for the modern world as an unprecedented tragedy of all time. The reason is that this happened in the heart of a well-fed mother of Europe, but, say, not in the Middle East or Donbass,

      Stoltenberg and others ... bark loudly and frown menacingly ... only they are accustomed to the fact that bombs fall "somewhere out there" ... and if the howl of sirens bursts into their well-equipped European way of life, destroyed heat and electricity networks and other Western "democratic values ​​"... are they ready? We are used to living on a powder keg ... Afghanistan did not have time to end as the 90s began in our country, followed by all subsequent economic and military crises ...
      IMHA. Europeans will lose the most and the US will sit aside and also earn.

      PS, I'm wondering what our "answer" is?

      Peskov: NATO's eastward expansion will not go unanswered
      The Kremlin has responded to Montenegro’s invitation to NATO. The expansion of the military infrastructure of the alliance to the east cannot but lead to retaliatory actions by Russia, warned a spokesman for the Russian president Dmitry Peskov.

      Sands offended?
      or ours will come out of some kind of agreement under this information noise?
    5. +2
      2 December 2015 14: 49
      In this regard, it is necessary to declare that if any NATO country is aggressive towards Russia, then we can answer any of them, well, since they are all at the same time.
  2. +7
    2 December 2015 13: 34
    “We decided that hybrid attacks could also trigger the use of the 5 article,” said the Secretary General after the meeting of the Alliance Council at the ministerial level.



    But what about the wording that there is a hybrid attack? or why bother yourself ... we think so and that's it ...
    1. +8
      2 December 2015 13: 37
      it is in the wording that that demon lurks, the main thing is that any attack can be declared a hybrid, or any opposition, and you can give a damn about the UN since the disgrace is covered by the fifth article
      1. +3
        2 December 2015 13: 42
        Quote: OlegLex
        it is in the wording that that demon lurks, the main thing is that any attack can be declared a hybrid, or any opposition, and you can give a damn about the UN since the disgrace is covered by the fifth article


        So I am about the same, hands are untied.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      2 December 2015 13: 54
      Quote: cniza
      But what about the wording that there is a hybrid attack?

      Quite right, and they themselves came up with it. Well then, let's program the ruble exchange rate, in the system of SPRN and the Perimeter ...)))
  3. +4
    2 December 2015 13: 34
    .... and the whole block will be responsible for the actions of one NATO member ...
    1. +1
      2 December 2015 16: 00
      Quote: Black
      .... and the whole block will be responsible for the actions of one NATO member ...

      This must be included in our military doctrine.
  4. +1
    2 December 2015 13: 34
    Experienced NATO members have made a bogeyman out of this "5th article", with the help of which they squeeze additional funds from the nominal members of the alliance. Now they have come up with a new reason for the intensive development of the budgets of the Eastern European / Baltic NATO extinctions ... fool am laughing
  5. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 34
    Well, along the way, this is another chatter, but in reality everything is completely wrong.
  6. +2
    2 December 2015 13: 36
    The fifth article of the Washington Treaty (an attack on a NATO member is an attack on the alliance) can be applied in the case of hybrid attacks, RIA Novosti reports Jens Stoltenberg.
    “We decided that hybrid attacks could also trigger the use of the 5 article,” said the Secretary General after the meeting of the Alliance Council at the ministerial level.

    In a word, they completely untie their hands and vest themselves with the right to unilaterally invade any country in the world when they please.
  7. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 37
    Stoltenberg is not from this world, suffering from senile dementia!
    Consider my words as a threat in the face of you, the entire NATO bloc! Treat it like
    Hybrid Attack, and apply to me the article 5 of the Phishington conspiracy !!!
  8. +1
    2 December 2015 13: 40
    We decided that hybrid attacks could also involve article 5

    And they will also determine which "attacks" are considered hybrid. We ourselves will appoint the enemy, we ourselves will start the war. And who will answer? In this case, apart from the word oborzeli from impunity, nothing is suitable.
  9. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 41
    and what is a hybrid war? or will they tell us at the last moment?
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 13: 45
      and what is a hybrid war? or will they tell us at the last moment?

      The right question. Since, in order to argue and discuss, it is necessary to define the concept.
  10. +1
    2 December 2015 13: 45
    More and more confident that the world will save only a nuclear strike from Russia, as in the case of the United States and Japan in the 45th.
    Well, these NATOegei will not slip off, no matter how you say it
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 14: 34
      And to look at how Article 5 will act, but it will not act in any way. Because declaring this one and getting the answer in the form of a nuclear strike against Europe is different. So the hands of the GDP are practically free.
  11. +1
    2 December 2015 13: 51
    "" hybrid attacks include misinformation and deception ""
    Very correct words, spoken on time and most importantly self-critical. In accordance with them, we can respond to any lie of the alliance with weapons. They planted a mine under themselves.
  12. 0
    2 December 2015 13: 51
    As far as I understand, Stoltenberg calls on Russia to restore the eastern bloc (Warsaw Pact)?!?
  13. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 05
    "The difficulty, he said, is that hybrid attacks are usually not country-specific," they come from different regions of the world. "
    These i.di.o.t.s. without their "tanned conductor" they cannot go to the pot on their own. Soon, guys, you will have hemorrhoids in one particular place. And this is the place of Libya.
  14. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 07
    The Istanbul bombing is what NATO thought was the beginning of a hybrid war. Naturally, they immediately decided that this was the work of Russia.
  15. -1
    2 December 2015 14: 12
    Article 5 of the Washington Treaty (an attack on a NATO member is an attack on the alliance) can be applied in the case of hybrid attacks

    as required to prove. NATO went on the offensive.

    We need to accept an amendment to our military doctrine "The aggression of one of the NATO member states against Russia is tantamount to an attack by the entire alliance on Russia."
    1. +1
      2 December 2015 14: 44
      It is not necessary to introduce amendments, to demonstrate an unshakable determination to strike in response to provocation. In this sense, Israel should be an example to us.
    2. 0
      2 December 2015 14: 44
      It is not necessary to introduce amendments, to demonstrate an unshakable determination to strike in response to provocation. In this sense, Israel should be an example to us.
    3. 0
      2 December 2015 15: 26
      Quote: lopvlad
      the attack of the alliance on Russia

      This item is similar to idiocy - if someone suddenly wants to go backwards - then this item will bring down all desire - there will be nothing to lose.
      1. 0
        2 December 2015 19: 10
        Quote: rrrj
        This item is similar to idiocy - if suddenly someone wants to go backwards


        if we had this item before, no one would have received approval from the United States from the United States for the destruction of our aircraft.
        And so the US will always be able to say "this is not us, but this one. But you cannot touch him like he is from NATO."
  16. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 18
    Under such a slogan it is not even necessary to look for someone to blame, it is clear that the culprits for unleashing a hybrid war will be countries from the "axis of evil" in which there is "insufficient democracy" or they have "excessive" natural resources.
    It would be a desire, but there is always a reason for war.
  17. +1
    2 December 2015 14: 21
    Hot heads to cool already seem to fail. The escalation is gradually leading us to the scenario whose implementation the Phishington sponsors want to see - they will still turn the cold war into a hot war, they developed all this for a specific purpose, the goal has not fallen off, they will not recede. Only the consistent and ruthless liquidation of the customers of this massacre can make a difference. ISIS is a weapon. No weapon shoots. The one who holds it shoots.
  18. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 39
    Such statements by the military-political leadership of NATO should be understood in the context of the upcoming ground operation in Syria. This is a clear and unambiguous message to us.
  19. +2
    2 December 2015 14: 53
    Repeal article 5 veste with NATO.
  20. 0
    2 December 2015 14: 59
    So they themselves suggested what to do! They need to be intimidated! They will gather all the time and puzzle over what to do. And do not let this gang relax.
  21. 0
    2 December 2015 15: 00
    As for article 5, so it will not work in modern conditions. NATO is heterogeneous in its military component, and all NATO members strive to harness the United States as army support. The United States, meanwhile, is also not rubber, besides, it is beginning to understand that it will work not only against Russia, but also against China. These are just threats and such militaristic rhetoric ... Sanctions seem to me, on the contrary, only beneficial, and the banking sector should not think about itself, but about serving the national economy and the real sector. It is not clear what "hybrid attacks" are, because NATO itself deals with them ...
  22. +2
    2 December 2015 15: 08
    NATO's hybrid bloc will apply hybrid fifth article in response to the hybrid attack of any of its hybrid member.
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 16: 34
      And today I not only smiled. Cool icon laughing
  23. 0
    2 December 2015 15: 10
    It looks like the European team is once again ready to try to fill up the bear. The old people who remembered how it ended the last time almost died out, but it's a pity.
  24. 0
    2 December 2015 15: 20
    bullshit, hybrid.
  25. 0
    2 December 2015 15: 33
    It seems that your disease can no longer be cured. If only intensive care in ward number 6.
  26. 0
    2 December 2015 16: 12
    How quickly everything turned around. Now, even with reinforced concrete evidence that Erdogan was involved in the purchase of oil from ISIS, we can say that this is a lie and, as a response, launch an attack by the entire alliance. But what a hassle - who in the alliance wants to fight for real? I do not think that true gay men and women want to get in the teeth. There is only one way out: in the style of the good old hybrid war - to demonize to the limit and throw into the frontline those who do not mind: Turks, Saudis, Albanians and others, and pull themselves up, unless of course everything goes well, afterwards. But even if it doesn’t work out very well, it’s also good for them, as there may already be not enough forces to retaliate.
    1. 0
      2 December 2015 16: 22
      SOMETIMES WISH. YES AND GRAVES HOW DO NOT AGAINST THE WORDS AT LEAST!
  27. +1
    2 December 2015 21: 05
    “We need to implement all these components. Hybrid challenges involve a very wide range of threats, and NATO needs a very wide range of capabilities to defend itself. Since, for example, hybrid attacks include misinformation and deception, the response time is very limited and therefore a very high degree of readiness of our forces is required, ”he added.
    A lot of interesting and extraordinary comments, it was interesting to me.
    My profession is far from the topics discussed at VO.
    My opinion of the layman: the FSA and those who joined them are regrouping troops, reconnaissance, and finding weaknesses. The decisive battles of this next world (because against the whole world) of the Macington macaques and Islamic fascists will begin after the winter, when the period of dust storms will come in Syria, and our planes and helicopters will not be able to fly.
    Everything will burn: Donbass, Transnistria, Syria will surely stir up in the North Caucasus and around the Crimea in the Black Sea. I hope that dust storms will not stop Caliber, submarines and strategic bombers.
    The swamp mold stirs. The guys who taught us to respect our country and ourselves will not let us down, I believe in it.
    Yes, I am a typical "scoop" born in the USSR and insist on neutralizing the "columns" and mold.
    We see that in all color revolutions and springs, the Macingon macaques organized coups by corrupt security forces and criminals. There is time to build this sludge, and even better to clean the country from rot.
    Here is my opinion. Izv, if that is not so. hi
  28. 0
    2 December 2015 21: 38
    I wonder who and why the article zamusnuvatsya, on what principles put notes?

    In secret, I’ll say that if the article contains useful information that carries the need to think, then definitely I will. And like / dislike, about the unpleasant or not, so we are not children!

    Sincerely.
  29. +1
    2 December 2015 21: 40
    NATO's last argument