Anti-ship missile tests continue in the US

The US Navy continues to test new aviation anti-ship missiles of two types - Boeing AGM-84N Harpoon Block II + and Lockheed Martin Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), blog reports bmpd citing Jane's Missiles & Rockets magazine.

Boeing F / A-18E Super Hornet aircraft of the US Navy with a new Boeing AGM-84N Harpoon Block II + anti-ship missile suspended

The “first“ free ”launch (without hitting the target, but with the full launch of the guidance system) of the new Boeing AGM-84N Harpoon Block II + anti-ship missile was produced by the US Navy from the Boeing F / A-18E Super Hornet at Point-Mugu training ground off the coast of California on US Pacific Coast 18 November 2015 of the year. The launch made it possible to demonstrate all the capabilities of the control system, including receiving a rocket after launching data from an aircraft carrier and the operation of the homing system, ”writes the author of the article, Richard Scott.

“Before, as part of the development of the Harpoon Block II + PCR, 152 bench tests were made, 15 launches from the ground installation and 16 launches from the aircraft, but without full activation of the guidance system,” he specified.

It is reported that the AGM-84N Harpoon Block II + is being created "as a modernization set of armed AGM-84D Harpoon Block 1С missiles for accelerated enhancement of the anti-ship capabilities of the F / A-18E / F aircraft." It is expected that it will be adopted by the end of 2017.

According to the author, the rocket is distinguished by a new guidance system, including GPS correction, the Strike Common Weapon Data Link (SCWDL) data interchange equipment with the carrier aircraft or with other aircraft and ship terminals (which allows the missile to be retargeted in flight, to direct a goal with a significant reduction in the time of operation of the homing head, etc.) and an improved active radar homing head (ARLGSN) with improved target selection and increased noise immunity. "

A little earlier, on November 3, the tests of the “Lockheed Martin Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM)” advanced mass-scale layouts began.

She, according to the publication, "is an anti-shipping version of the Lockheed Martin AGM-158B Joint Air-to-Surface Stand-off Missile Extended Range (JASSM-ER) high-precision tactical aircraft cruise missile."

Boeing F / A-18E Super Hornet aircraft of the United States Navy with two suspended mass-dimensional models of the Lockheed Martin Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM)

For accelerated development of the rocket from the budget allocated additional funds. It is assumed that LRASM will reach its initial operational readiness (EOC) stage in the US Air Force in the 2018 fiscal year (as part of the B-1B bombers), and in the US Navy - in the 2019 fiscal year (as part of the F / A-18E / F weapons ).

Comments

[izya top]

to stop one little thing and our craftsmen for familiarization

[beer-youk]

Similar (in terms of parameters) missiles were in service with the USSR Air Force at the end of the 70s of the last century.

[theodore rasp]

And they were withdrawn from service 3-4 years ago as not corresponding to modern threats. And according to the workers and peasants, they are good against sailing ships and armadillos.

[just exp]

Oh, and the electronics parameters are no longer important?
Now, when electronic warfare plays a huge role, speed and so on are no longer as important as before.
An example of the Arab-Israeli war, at first the P-15 was sunk by Eilat, and then not a single missile from Syrian boats could hit the target.

[NEXUS]

Quote: beer-youk

Similar (in terms of parameters) missiles were in service with the USSR Air Force at the end of the 70s of the last century.

Something tells me that even to BrahMos this rocket will be far away ... and on the approach the hyper-speed BrahMos-2, and BrahMos-mini is available ...

[Mera joota]

Quote: NEXUS

Something tells me that even to BrahMos this rocket will be far away ...

Of course, it is necessary to become heavier two and a half times and to lose three times in range ...

[Wiskar]

Quote: NEXUS

Something tells me that even to BrahMos this rocket will be far away ... and on the approach the hyper-speed BrahMos-2, and BrahMos-mini is available ...

The United States has in development - SM-6 - an American anti-aircraft missile. Developed by Raytheon.
The arrival of SM-6 missiles in service is planned in 2016

The RIM-174 SM-6 ERAM missile (Eng. Extended Range Active Missile) is an evolution of the RIM-156 SM-2ER family of missiles. The main difference is an advanced guidance system at the terminal site; while the previous missiles used semi-active homing on the target, followed by a radar beam from the carrier ship, the new SM-6 missile is equipped with an active homing head.


The SM-6 rocket has the following advantages:

The ability to simultaneously intercept any number of targets - previous missiles that had semi-active guidance (that is, they needed a target radar at the terminal site with the radar of the carrier ship) could simultaneously intercept no more targets than there were target radars on the carrier ship (usually 3-4), which forced to interrupt after interception in a few seconds to switch radars to a new target and give target designation to the next flying missiles. The SM-6 missile, equipped with its own active GOS, does not need to “illuminate” the target with the radar of the launch vehicle, which allows you to simultaneously intercept any number of targets with any number of missiles.
The possibility of hitting low-flying targets, sheltered from the radars of the carrier ship beyond the horizon - allows you to intercept low-flying cruise missiles for the entire duration of their flight, starting from the detection line. At the same time, the SM-6 is displayed by autopilot in the calculated area of ​​the target location (data on the target's approach can be obtained from another ship or aircraft integrated into the common BIUS network), then turns on its active GOS and starts searching and homing.
The ability to effectively hit inconspicuous targets at long distances - due to the proximity of the active radar in the head of the guidance of the rocket and the target, as well as a more effective target irradiation angle.
The possibility of more effective counteraction by means of electronic warfare - due to the two-way data exchange with the carrier ship and the possibility of comparing data from the onboard radar of the rocket and the radar of the ship.
The ability to intercept ballistic targets - thanks to the new accelerator, the SM-6 missile has wide capabilities in the field of tactical missile defense; it is capable of effectively intercepting tactical missiles and warheads of ballistic missiles of small and medium range at the entrance to the atmosphere. This application does not require modification of the Aegis ECU.

TTX
length: 6,55 m
weight: 1500 kg
speed: up to Mach 3,5
range: up to 240 km
target height: to 33 km
PU Type: Mk 41 (Aegis Systems)
warhead type: kinetic or fragmentation Mk 125
guidance system: command-inertial + homing ARGSN in the final section

[GSH-18]

Quote: NEXUS

Something tells me that even to BrahMos this rocket will be far away ... and on the approach the hyper-speed BrahMos-2, and BrahMos-mini is available ...

I want to believe it. But during the collapse of the USSR, ours sold to the states several Soviet anti-ship missiles (I don’t remember the exact name, please call) the predecessors and founders of Onyx. Those were interested in the electronic filling of our anti-ship missiles. To create a countermeasure, it is abscess! But, it is possible that the foe fished out for their wunderwafe ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: GSH-18

I want to believe it. But during the collapse of the USSR, ours sold to the states several Soviet anti-ship missiles (I don’t remember the exact name, please call) the predecessors and founders of Onyx. Those were interested in the electronic filling of our anti-ship missiles. To create a countermeasure, it is abscess! But, it is possible that the foe fished out for their wunderwafe ...

As I was correctly corrected by a man under the nickname Old 26, it would probably be more correct to compare this rocket with our analogue, the Kh-35UE. But she was shown to the people already in 92, at the "Mosaeroshow-92" ...

JSC Concern Radioelectronic Technologies in 2015 announced the possibility of placing the Kh-35UE missile on board the deck version of the Ka-52K helicopter in case of upgrading the airborne radar. This will increase the helicopter detection range by 2 times, which is almost 200 km.

Best regards

[Major Yurik]

The whole super-task of the Yankes is to keep the aircraft carrier trough intact, transporting "democracy" to the countries that the Yankees could not get at the most. The trough carries an airplane, which is the trough and they are trying to save it, less external tasks will be done, everything is on guarding the trough!

[GSH-18]

Quote: Major Yurik

The trough carries aircraft, which it’s the trough and they try to save, fewer external tasks will be done, everything is to guard the trough! am

Aircraft from the so-called "trough" by you provide cover for the entire ship formation (escort and aircraft carrier), submarines from the CD. And they carry out reconnaissance at a very long distance (carrier-based AWACS aircraft, anti-submarine aviation) as well as firing the corresponding anti-ship missiles from under the radio horizon in rotation mode at enemy ship formations, without exposing themselves, as well as themselves, to any danger.
I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t underestimate underestimating the capabilities of the enemy. Moreover, he was already engaged in the development of modern RCCs, while having even what we never had.

[Persistent]

At the Nobel Peace Prize nominated installation of S-400.

[Mera joota]

Quote: iza top

to stop one little thing and our craftsmen for familiarization

Duc campaign rested earlier, otherwise where the X-35 would have appeared ...

[cniza]

For accelerated development of the rocket from the budget allocated additional funds. It is assumed that LRASM will reach its initial operational readiness (EOC) stage in the US Air Force in the 2018 fiscal year (as part of the B-1B bombers), and in the US Navy - in the 2019 fiscal year (as part of the F / A-18E / F weapons ).

Flurry, flurry, nothing will help you; there is no truth behind you.

[PQ-18]

Nothing, we ALSO ...

[GYGOLA]

Something the Chinese authorities are pulling with a demand for repayment of the debt.

[bad]

Quote: iza top

to stop one little thing and our craftsmen for familiarization

.. practical thought

[Djclone]

Extra money allocated. Hurry, get ready. The only question is for whom are these gifts. For us or for the Chinese?

[kil 31]

Quote: Djclone

Extra money allocated. Hurry, get ready. The only question is for whom are these gifts. For us or for the Chinese?

For all who are not correctly democratic.

[voyaka uh]

I think the Chinese Navy is more concerned about them.
China for every LRASM factory
Launches one new frigate.

[Asadullah]

China for every LRASM factory
launches one new frigate

They have there a series of missile defense missile defense project Dongfang. It seems that you have partially bought, partially stolen. The breakthrough, as usual, will (or will not) be hypersonic, but for now, to sink the ship, it is necessary to empty, for a start, its defensive capabilities.

[voyaka uh]

It’s more difficult to shoot down a supersonic CR
but this LRASM is a headache for missile defense.
She is a stealth, very wound around navigation, noise-resistant,
quite small in length.

[bmv04636]

and than brahmos they are not satisfied They would have bought from the Hindus and not been tormented

[prostofily]

Whose ships are going to sink, or something of their own.

[Woodman]

Yes, so that they go broke with their missiles and unsecured currency!

[Sterlya]

Quote: Lesovik

Yes, so that they go broke with their missiles and unsecured currency!

Secured, not secured. As long as the whole world uses dead presidents, the United States can afford a lot. But, this Lafa, of course, will not last forever. Everything ends when that.

[Engineer]

such a rocket only drown boats, if it catches up

[voyaka uh]

Harpoon has 220 kg of warhead, LRASM has 450 kg.
Too much for a boat ....

[opus]

Quote: voyaka uh

Harpoon has 220 kg of warhead, LRASM has 450 kg.

at AGM-84H / K

360 kg (800 lbs) WDU-40 penetrating.
at LRASM ....

and their 2nd
A and B: subsonic and supersonic
at A, yes 450 kg, penetrating WDU-42 / B

at B:

and 150 will not be. Tk no where, for MK.41 unified and V> 2,8 M

[mvg]

Honestly, they opened the news for me, in a good sense, that there is a supersonic ax.

and their 2nd
A and B: subsonic and supersonic

did not know.
Everybody thought that the Pintos had gone "the other way." On supersonic they had to "pour". And it was more interesting to make noise immunity, stealth, ANN accuracy, and many attack algorithms.
Yes, and cap 3 usually told us that Mosquito weighs, and Harpoon sucks ..

[dchegrinec]

Restless Americans! They don’t know what area to hit! She doesn’t live calmly in this country. She wants to conquer everything without end. Wait for the blanks on her stupid head, we will tear off in one salvo!

[mvg]

Quote: beer-youk

Similar (in terms of parameters) missiles were in service with the USSR Air Force at the end of the 70s of the last century.

C'mon ... Dreamed of a heavy drug dream? Tell the Soviet counterpart. So that on the plane, and on the submarine, and on the boat, and on the ship of the 1st rank ..

[NDR-791]

The launch made it possible to demonstrate all the capabilities of the control system, including receiving the rocket after launching data from the carrier aircraft and the operation of the homing system
The key word here is "demonstrate" (yeah, they dropped the truncated and began to demonstrate secret development to the whole world). From the very beginning of the article, there are logical inconsistencies, namely:
1. receiving data from the carrier after the start is the last century, and its middle, and not high-precision long-range weapons!
2. the work of the homing system "without hitting the target" even with a blunt disc ??? So this is done perfectly at the stand without killing the aircraft resource ...
Something smells messy ???

[opus]

Quote: NDR-791

1. receiving data from the carrier after the start is the last century, and its middle, and not high-precision long-range weapons!

why carry nonsense?
They only have data transmission equipment on the AIM-120D (transmission of correction commands and a two-way communication system).
We are working on this on RVV-DB.
On our PCR-no.
"last century" -ugu


Of course. Since the last century, more than 7000 pieces have been produced (for 2008)
incl. ground complexes ...

Quote: NDR-791

ak this is done perfectly on the stand without killing the resource of the plane ...

Rocket Air Launch.
What is the "stand" in LJ?

[NDR-791]

I will explain for the very smart, I will start from the end:
1. An air-launched or ground-launched missile (with at least an inertial guidance system), which, in general, in this case, at the end of the trajectory, doesn’t use its own guidance system, which is initially tested on the bench. A radio fuse for anti-aircraft shells has been used massively since the 44 year (1944). In the case when the GOAL IS NOT ATTENDED by the conditions of the demonstration as stated in the article, WHAT IS TESTED ??? Tell me the fool !!!
2. These seven thousand pieces sunk one destroyer in the "Falklands Conflict" - An airborne exocet is a very special tool. You can master the money as much as they give, but not a single specialist has confirmed not only the real application, but also the REAL TESTS.
3. Just don’t say it out loud that we don’t have anti-ship air-launched missiles, otherwise they’ll laugh publicly ...

[opus]

Quote: NDR-791

Missile air launch or ground (yes even with an inertial guidance system)

both air and ground (surface and underwater) - EVERYONE HAS ANNs (and from the 80s, GPS / Navstar correction). Like Adolf (like FAU-1,2) they don’t fly (autopilot)

Quote: NDR-791

WHAT TO BE TESTED ??? Tell me the fool !!!

1. In vain you are so self-critical about yourself, although of course it's not for me to judge
RGM-84M (AGM-84M) - version of the RGM-84L rocket with a two-way communication channel. IT AND TESTED.
Chess word don't know how on

Quote: NDR-791

this is done perfectly at the stand without killing the resource of the plane ...

?
Is there a stand at 100-170 km (range carrier KR)?
-There is a stand that simulates the speed of the carrier up to 900km / h and the speed of the KR up to 890km / h? Azimuthal, radial displacement?
Is there a stand that simulates the influence of atmospheric factors on communication?
well and so on

Quote: NDR-791

These seven thousand units sunk one destroyer in the "Falklands Conflict" - Airborne Exocet -

Quote: NDR-791

Something smells messy ???

1.Exocet - french cruise anti-ship missile (Developed by the French company Aerospasial) and not related to the AGM-84 (to the American McDonnell Douglas or Boeing Integrated Defense Systems -NOT)
2. RCC AGM / RGM / UGM-84 Harpoon NOT USED in the Falkland Conflict (Argentina did not have them, however, like their carriers, England had nothing to drown. Yes and was not in England on the Falklands, the carrier with a pylon suspension type Aero-65A1 / Aero-7A1: P-3 Orion, MAU-9A / 1, S-7 Viking, A-6E Corsair-II and A-XNUMXE Intruder)
3. "Baptism of fire" aviation RCC Harpoon occurred (among the Americans) ONLY in 1986 (I recall the Falklands were in 1982. The A-6 Intruder from the aircraft carriers America, Coral Sea and Saratoga missiles were sunk by two Libyan ships - a missile boat Wahid and Ein Zagut corvette (no survivors)

And by "aliens" (but not the aviation option) - in November 1980, during the war between Iran and Iraq. Then Iranian boats sank two obsolete Soviet-built Iraqi missile boats with RGM-84A missiles.

The last Today, an example of the large-scale use of the Harpoon anti-ship missile was the battle of the American and Iranian fleets in the Persian Gulf, which took place on April 18, 1988. The Iranian frigate Sahand and the Iranian frigate Sahand were flooded. (In my opinion, there are no survivors)

[opus]

Quote: NDR-791

3. Just don’t say it out loud that we don’t have anti-ship air-launched missiles, otherwise they’ll laugh publicly ...

1. How would you like after

Quote: NDR-791

These seven thousand pieces sunk one destroyer in the "Falklands Conflict" -

did not have to launder ....
2.SK-310A / BrahMos-A(aviation) Tests in progress since 2012

BrahMos-M / BrahMos-Mini - under construction

X-65C / X-65SE - anti-ship cruise missile project based on the KR X-65. Not implemented.

X-30 - in 1963, the development of the X-30 rocket was discontinued. Like the X-33, like the X-45 Lightning.

Kh-32/9-A-2362 - The Sonetka design and development project seems to have been completed, not accepted for service

K-10EN "Kometa-10", K-10S missile - AS-2 KIPPER, KSR-5 (KSR-5M, KSR-5P) - AS-6 KINGFISH, KS-1 Kometa - AS-1 KENNEL

(all this junk)
AND (ALL THEY)

Quote: opus

On our PCR-no.

-DO NOT have a two-way communication channel for the correction of PZ.
And for RCC, this is very important.
AGSN capture ARGS-54E: in azimuth ± 45 °, in elevation from + 10 ° to -20 °.
Maximum range - up to 65 km (best case scenario) (ARGS-35E generally has 20km)

Even 3M54 / ZM54-1 Caliber-A (SS-N-27 Sizzler) DO NOT HAVE (and there are only a few dozen of them)
==========================================
Conclusion?

something like this:

[mvg]

Worthy. 5 with a minus ..

X-65C / X-65SE - anti-ship cruise missile project based on the KR X-65. Not implemented.

a .. A carrier aircraft (Tu-22M3 or another) can launch an X-65SE rocket from a height of 0,1 to 12 km at a speed of 540-1050 km / h for a sea target, the coordinates of which are known only tentatively. The launch of the rocket is carried out according to the principle of “shot and forgot”. A rocket flies to a given area at low altitude, being controlled by an inertial guidance system. At the intended location of the target, the missile increases the flight altitude and begins to barrage, turning on the active active radar homing until it captures the target.

The X-65SE missile was exhibited at the MAKS-97 exhibition.

[opus]

Quote: mvg

a .. The carrier aircraft (Tu-22M3 or another) can launch the Kh-65SE from a height of 0,1 to 12 km with

200m-12000m (for "E": 600-10000 (KRRT limits)

carrier speed = 720-830 km / h

Cannot be 100m, base "product 120" (КР Х-65)
It was reported that the Kh-65S was tested from the Tu-22M and is intended for the armament of Tu-95, Tu-142, Tu-22M, Tu-1b0 and others, including tactical ones. Its launch is carried out with a turret or beam PU. Interruptions in funding did not allow the start of serial production of the X-65C for the needs of the USSR Armed Forces, and then Russia. In 1993, RCC was offered for export under the index X-65SE.

[mvg]

I made copy-paste with airvare .. I just did not leave a link to the source.

It seemed to me that you are denying the existence of air-based missiles in Russia. So I remembered .. Something we were going to AUGi to drown. With maaalenkoy such a probability ... (18% approximately) BUT collected.
And your comments are nice to read, really. Probably either working or getting involved.

[opus]

Quote: mvg

I made copy-paste with airvar

i know read

Quote: mvg

It seemed to me that you are denying the existence of air-based missiles in Russia.

?
1.

Quote: opus

K-10EN "Kometa-10", K-10S missile - AS-2 KIPPER, KSR-5 (KSR-5M, KSR-5P) - AS-6 KINGFISH, KS-1 Kometa - AS-1 KENNEL

(all this junk)
AND (ALL THEY) "New"
-DO NOT have a two-way communication channel for the correction of PZ.
And for RCC, this is very important.
AGSN capture ARGS-54E: in azimuth ± 45 °, in elevation from + 10 ° to -20 °.
Maximum range - up to 65 km (at best) (ARGS-35E has 20 km in general)

Even 3M54 / ZM54-1 Caliber-A (SS-N-27 Sizzler) DO NOT HAVE (and there are only a few dozen of them)

How do I "deny" this? ... I held them in my hands.
2.This is underdeveloped No. 791

Quote: NDR-791

3. Just don’t say it out loud that we don’t have anti-ship air-launched missiles, otherwise they’ll laugh publicly ...

tried (probably from impotence) to attribute to me.
Well, it's not from a big mind (if equals Exoset and Harpoons)

Quote: NDR-791

These seven thousand pieces sunk one destroyer in the "Falklands Conflict" -

and believes that harpoons were used in the Falklands (probably Argentines?)

Quote: mvg

Why, we were going to drown AUGs.

here it is available (albeit with errors) described how to "heat"

(well, what the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) + Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), and the United States Intelligence Community, in general, knew at that time)

[Mercenary]

In short, ask mattresses from our rockets, maybe they will sell, like the R-180 engines! and then again you’ll make some sort of nonsense !!! The most valuable thing about them is that they are noise immunity. EW probably made laugh ...

[andrew-z]

I wonder, why was the article so zaminusili? a person simply presented information without value judgments, bare facts, as science requires ...
Author! The article must be ended with the words "America will fall apart", "the dollar will collapse" and write something about the abamka - otherwise they will not understand.

[Major Yurik]

As akhidzhakova would say (not to be mentioned by night): - Forgive us, author!

[opus]

Quote: andrew-z

I wonder, why was the article so zaminusili?

Probably because NO such a CD


Boeing AGM-84N Harpoon Block II +

AGM-84L HARPOON Block II + (air-based) with DATALINK

AGM-84M Harpoon Block III is (sea-based) with DATALINK

http://www.navyrecognition.com/ ошибся и все повторяют

Harpoon Next-Gen so far only in dreams

[figter]

According to the author, the rocket is distinguished by a new guidance system, including GPS correction, the Strike Common Weapon Data Link (SCWDL) data interchange equipment with the carrier aircraft or with other aircraft and ship terminals (which allows the missile to be retargeted in flight, to direct a goal with a significant reduction in the time of operation of the homing head, etc.) and an improved active radar homing head (ARLGSN) with improved target selection and increased noise immunity. "
A little earlier, on November 3, the tests of the “Lockheed Martin Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM)” advanced mass-scale layouts began.
She, according to the publication, "is an anti-shipping version of the Lockheed Martin AGM-158B Joint Air-to-Surface Stand-off Missile Extended Range (JASSM-ER) high-precision tactical aircraft cruise missile."

Well, they love to show themselves off as a "high-tech nation" with the help of the Latin abbreviation. Wherever you go - improved superABSDEF with vitamin "C". Why not write simply - two-channel radio correction with the subsequent inclusion of an active homing head with SDC.

[Mera joota]

Damn, barely made out. In the second photo LRASM between HARM and PTB, RCC black ...

[Old26]

Quote: NEXUS

Something tells me that even to BrahMos this rocket will be far away ... and on the approach the hyper-speed BrahMos-2, and BrahMos-mini is available ...

Why compare God's gift with an egg? You do not compare, for example, AK with a double-barreled shotgun, why is there such a comparison? Maybe it’s worth not comparing it with Bramos, and even more so with hypersonic Bramos-2, but comparing the comparable - our Uranus?

Quote: Major Yurik

The whole super-task of the Yankes is to keep the aircraft carrier trough intact, transporting "democracy" to the countries that the Yankees could not get at the most. The trough carries an airplane, which is the trough and they are trying to save it, less external tasks will be done, everything is on guarding the trough!

And this is the super task of any country that has aircraft carriers. If Russia will have them - this will be our task as well.

Quote: Engineer

such a rocket only drown boats, if it catches up

Do we already have boats with speeds of 800-900 km / h? you honestly discovered America .... They would at least suggest the name of such a boat ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: Old26

You do not compare, for example, AK with a double-barreled shotgun, why is there such a comparison? Maybe it’s worth not comparing it with Bramos, and even more so with hypersonic Bramos-2, but comparing the comparable - our Uranus?

Are you talking about the X-35 (3M24) “Uranus”? Then let’s compare it with the X-35UE, I think it will be more honest