Military Review

Perspective PKR for the most powerful destroyer of the PRC Navy will put Washington in its place

39



Demonstrative patrols of the South China Sea in the area of ​​the Spratly archipelago by the destroyers of the US Navy's URO, passing naval exercises of the “anti-Chinese bloc” in the Indian Ocean, as well as constant work on the modernization and updating of the naval forces of Japan and Australia with American funding and technical support, - all this testifies to the accelerated pace of the formation of a broad anti-Chinese coalition, which, according to the American plan, it will soon have to control the fleet and the Air Force of the Middle Kingdom at once in two strategic directions, which was described in detail in our analytical review of the reasons for conducting the Malabar-2015 exercises.

The most important sign of the growing military and strategic presence of the West in the Asia-Pacific region and the Indian Ocean is the rapid renewal of the Royal Air Force and fleet Australia, which are signing with American defense corporations more and more contracts for the purchase of military equipment that, for a "quiet" distant power of the Southern Hemisphere, can carry out tasks of strategic importance at a considerable distance from the Australian coast. One example of such significant acquisitions is a contract for the supply of 8 P-8A Poseidon anti-submarine aircraft, the first of which is already at the assembly stage in Kansas, the other is the purchase of the MQ-4C Triton marine reconnaissance UAV. Theoretically, the Australian fleet would have had enough modernized versions of the P-3C “Orion” anti-submarine aircraft with a flight speed of 500 km / h to control the territorial waters of Australia and the adjacent sections of the Pacific and Indian Oceans, but practically Australia needed 2 times faster, more advanced and more expensive machine “Triton” will generally allow observation within the limits of Western Asia and the Far East. Why do you think so serious aviation for such a provincial state? Of course, to support the US naval strategy in remote areas of the oceans. Naturally, the well-established economic ties in the Asia-Pacific region force both states to closely interact in almost all areas of foreign trade, but this does not apply at all to military-technical cooperation and geostrategic views, which Australia has diametrically opposed to Chinese and fully corresponds to American ones.

The unmanned strategic reconnaissance aircraft MQ-4C “Triton” purchased by the Royal Australian Navy are capable of conducting reconnaissance flights in the oceanic theater of attack in a radius of about 5000 km, covering almost the entire Indian and most of the Pacific Oceans. Installed on board radar with AFAR AN / ZPY-3 has a synthetic aperture mode, thanks to which at a distance of 100-200 km capable of detecting small surface targets, including logging and periscopes of submarines, targets can be clearly identified. "Tritons" will create a lot of inconvenience for the actions of the surface and submarine fleets of China on any of the marine SN, which creates difficulties in the formation of the concept of "three targets"


Recent years have clearly shown that the United States is trying to rally the largest team of the “anti-Chinese bloc” in the APR, and in part they succeeded in this by attracting India, Australia, Japan, the Philippines, and partly Vietnam.

Not being an official military-political alliance, the “anti-Chinese bloc” represents a rather formidable military structure in the regions of its influence, which has numerous advantages over the Chinese Navy and Air Force. In particular, this is achieved at the expense of the Indian Air Force and Navy, which is armed with more than 200 Su-30MKI and several hundreds of the most powerful anti-ship missiles "BrahMos" capable of destroying more than half of the Chinese naval personnel with a single prepared MRAU; the armed forces of the Chinese Navy until today were only subsonic C-801 / C-802 anti-ship missiles, which were no different from the American "Harpoons" and did not pose a serious threat to the Aegis system. Su-30MKI, and now French “Rafali” together with American-based carrier-based multi-purpose fighter aircraft F / A-18E / F “Super Hornet” are capable of providing advantages over long-range air combat over Chinese aircraft, since a small percentage of Chinese fighters are now it is equipped with PFAR / AFAR airborne radars, and the three vehicles listed above are all equipped with a PAR radar, and the Rafali MBDA Meteor long-range missiles can also be used. For a very long time, the PRC slowly and surely lost its parity with the group of these states, which ultimately threatened the strategic influence of the Middle Kingdom in the region.

But by the end of 2015, there was a real enlightenment in the situation that would again force the US, Indian and Japanese Navy to look at the Chinese fleet with caution, and the Air Force to think ten times before getting into trouble with the Chinese fighters.

WHAT WILL BECOME A “BONE IN THE THROAT” FOR AN ANTI-CHINESE UNIT?

Looking through information on modern Chinese squadron destroyers URO X. 052C and 052D once on the Internet, I came across a comment from a reader that "American" Arly Burke "will eat them without salt." So, now I can only upset all fans of the American fleet.

In 20 November, information and photographs from the PRC appeared, where in one of the shipyards (Jiangnan or Dalian) a completely new sample transport container completely different from the TPC for anti-aircraft missiles was loaded into UVPU at 052D Ave. HHQ-9. The constructive arrangement of stiffeners on the container is typical of TPK for anti-ship missiles, and not for SAMs (rings are assembled in double groups on both sides of the WPK, in the SAMs the rings are evenly distributed on the body of the WPK, for example, TPK for HQ-9 or 48НХXUMUMЕ missiles). This says only one thing: the Chinese Navy is moving to a new promising anti-ship missile YJ-6, which will give the fighting ships high impact capabilities, which Chinese sailors could only dream of earlier.

In the photographs presented by the Chinese Internet, one can find clear differences between TPK for ZUR HQ-9 (top photo) and TPK for RCC YJ-18 (bottom photo), the number and arrangement of rings of two TPK are radically different



Destroyers of the 052D project, unlike 052С, are equipped with two universal built-in launchers for 32 anti-aircraft missiles or anti-ship missiles each. Ammunition from 64 missiles or anti-ship missiles can be represented completely in any ratio, and therefore the type 052D can successfully perform not only the functions of defense, but also anti-ship tasks. PKR YJ-18 - Chinese analogue of the Russian PKR 3М14Е “Caliber-NK”. The rocket has similar LTH, so on the march of the flight speed can reach 1100 km / h, and when approaching the target - to 3000 km / h; YJ-18 is capable of performing anti-aircraft maneuvers just a few meters from the water surface, where the decimeter AN / SPY-1A MRLS has considerable difficulty tracking targets due to interference and reflections of the S-band from the water surface.

Start-up RCC YJ-18, in the work of a powerful solid-fuel accelerator


In spite of the fact that American EMs of the Arleigh Burke class and Ticonderoga class cruisers have the MK2 UVNX 41, in which 96 and 122 TPK cells, respectively, which can accommodate any number of inconspicuous LRASM anti-ship missiles, the American ships will have There are much less chances to survive in the confrontation with the Chinese fleet, because the YJ-18 strike will be delivered much faster, and it will be much harder to repel it than the Chinese intercept American LRASMs or Harpoons. The only task that now presents to Chinese shipbuilders is the unification of all types of ships, including 052S destroyers, 054 Ave frigates and 056 aprons corvettes, to use YJ-18 anti-ship missiles, which will allow the Chinese KUG to split into smaller connections that can and independently solve marine percussion problems, if the theater is extensive. It is also necessary to increase the naval composition of the PRC Navy, because the most modern EM Ave 052D in the fleet is now only four, and 052 Ave - six units; the pace is not impressive.

Another important event is the contract for the purchase of 24 Su-35С in the configuration of the VKS of the Russian Federation. 6 of the full Su-35С links, equipped with the Irbis-E H035 radar and AL-41Ф1 TRDDF, will be transmitted. Apparently, the aircraft will be used to carry out the most complex and dangerous air operations over the South China Sea and near the borders of Taiwan and the Diaoyutai Archipelago, where the appearance of American F-22A fighter jets is possible. And also will serve as benchmarks for the modernization of the deck fighter J-15S.

Improvement of the Chinese Air Force may occur at a more rapid pace, quite unexpectedly for all Asia-Pacific states and the United States. Internet resource "defensone.com" recently brought an important news about the creation by Chinese engineers of a complex structural stealth material based on varactors - semiconductor diodes installed under the thinnest envelope of capacitors and resistors. The coating belongs to the group of nanomaterials, since its thickness is less than half a millimeter. It is stated that the material is light enough and only slightly reduce the thrust-to-weight ratio of modern Chinese fighters, while the effective dispersion surface indicator will decrease dozens of times.

New radio absorbing material can be used in any structural elements of existing and developed Chinese aircraft and some types of missile weapons, which will greatly reduce the capabilities of modern radar facilities of the US Armed Forces and their allies. Considering that the Su-35C in the Chinese Air Force is already a huge problem for the Japanese and Americans, giving it a radar signature of the image intensifier in 0,7 — 1 and XXXX (2 — 1 and M2 with some weapons on the suspensions) will not even allow the Raptor to conduct equal long-range air combat, as well as pre-detect airborne early warning, on which the air forces of self-defense today make huge bets. As Chinese experts have stated, the newest material exhibits the greatest radio-absorbing qualities against DM (S) - the wave range on which most modern radar detection and targeting functions, including the famous AN / APY-2 and AN / SPY-1 (station data are the basis of the DRLO in the Air Force and Navy of Japan and the USA).

I was frankly annoyed by the reaction to our national tragedy by the representative of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Hong Lei, who called the Turkish aggression “an accident”, no one expected such tolerance, but this was simply unacceptable and disgusting on the part of China, a strategic and ideological partner), but the delivery of 35С and the support of the Chinese military industrial complex for us now is an expedient and very profitable step, because the PRC today continues to control every step of the naval forces of the main global aggressor in the southern strategic direction, where we can We still do not have a living.
Author:
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. EFA
    EFA 1 December 2015 06: 16 New
    +2
    By the way, if you look at the picture more broadly, it may well turn out that the strengthening of the NATO fleets and groups in the region is done in order to successfully block the Chinese fleet if it suddenly decides to go to the aid of the Russians in Syria, where now, it seems to me, a large mess.
    1. SAXA.SHURA
      SAXA.SHURA 1 December 2015 17: 39 New
      +5
      When their plane crashes, we will also say, oh, what an accident, well, anything can happen, as they were rotten and will remain, I hollowed them at Damansky.
      1. Talgat
        Talgat 1 December 2015 17: 55 New
        +1
        China and Russia are of course on one side of the barricades - but as if everyone is trying to put the other forward under the first blow, now China is lucky - Russia has Ukraine and Crimea - now Iran and Syria.

        In turn, Russia very, very restrainedly supports China against Japan and the United States in the Pacific Ocean, giving China the "honor" of restraining the enemy in the Far East (even the Pacific Fleet is not being renewed as a priority - because Japan and the United States have something to do)

        Such "games" of allies are common. I doubt that the Pacific Fleet will stand up for China if an incident with Japan suddenly starts, for example

        But. probably. with the development of China, with the strengthening of the Eurasian Union and Russia and China (and with them Iran and the Bolivarian countries) will have to make a difficult choice - or still a military-political alliance and mutual obligations - or continue the current policy "just not to stand up openly against the masters."
  2. Ruslan
    Ruslan 1 December 2015 06: 17 New
    16
    the author's attitude to China is not clear. where did he get the idea that there is strategic cooperation? There is milking of the Russian Federation by China, which takes advantage of our problems, forcing, in fact, to give the Su-35, and then the S-400. if you look like that, it is quite clear why for him this is just a "minor incident". tired of these wet dreams of a Beijing-Moscow alliance, which does not exist in any form at all. confusing us that China is trying to drive amers on the Pacific Ocean, as if they are pouring information to us where, whom they noticed. and even with such a policy, our TF will not be weak "for now," but for a long, long time. without a minus, but I do not agree with part of the article at all.
    1. derik1970
      derik1970 1 December 2015 07: 28 New
      +3
      good you are absolutely right, the Chinese are still friends, checked on Damansky Island.
    2. Per se.
      Per se. 1 December 2015 09: 31 New
      14
      There are a lot of optimists about China, we have a bear hugging a dragon, and Uncle Sam with a diaper ... China is not yet an enemy to us, but also a friend, as they say, that one. The article mentions - "RCC YJ-18 - the Chinese analogue of the Russian RCC 3М14Э Caliber-NK"There will be more all kinds of" analogues "of the newest Russian systems, the more our dollar-minded traders sell the latest developments to the Chinese, saving the Chinese time and billions. The same States will not sell weapons that may pose a threat or competition to the United States itself, and some weapons , such as fighters F-117 or F-22 are not for strangers at all. We have, please, ourselves often with a "bare bottom", but for friends it is not a pity, the "shoemaker" is very generous, to sharpen boots on other people's feet. whether the French threw us with the Mistral, forgotten, they are now "allies", blah blah Hollande is a friend again. "Stab in the back" from Turkey, but what did they think, if Turkey was an enemy of Russia throughout history, this is "karma" for various interests, the law of geopolitics. What Chinese friends and allies are for us, no matter how painful it may be. The most powerful group of the PLA stands exactly opposite the border with Russia. With the shameful "demarcation" of the border, the Chinese did not give us an inch of their land, but watered with blood advice The Russian bourgeois gave their Damansky soldiers to China. We also surrendered other territories along the border, including an important fortified area on the Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island, which was covered by Khabarovsk. It was infinitely "wise" to agree to withdraw troops from the border for 200 kilometers, where ours left the developed borders and retreated to the north, "into the tundra", and the Chinese to the south, without losing anything, having many kilometers of tunnels to the Russian border for secret troop advancement. Yes, we have to clean up our current problem with addiction, but it is hardly reasonable to solve it at such a price of concessions to China, especially since by selling its goods in Russia, China has significantly raised its economy, and the Chinese need to bargain for the right to have our market, and not Russia, to encourage what is already beneficial for the Chinese.
  3. Bongo
    Bongo 1 December 2015 06: 39 New
    +8
    I read the publication with great interest, but I strongly disagree with this phrase at the end:
    Su-35С supplies and support for the Chinese military-industrial complex for us now have an expedient and very profitable sha
    negative China pursues only its interests and it is naive to believe that in the future it will be different.
    1. Duke
      Duke 1 December 2015 07: 35 New
      +6
      Destroyers destroyers type 052D - A series of twelve Chinese missile destroyers. According to October 2015, the first two ships of the series are already in operation, three more are being tested, and five ships are in different stages of construction.

      CHARACTERISTICS
      displacement standard more than 6000 t
      160 length m.,
      18 width m
      ARMAMENT
      Artillery: new 130-mm AC type PJ-38 and MZAK type 730
      Rocket: universal vertical launch launchers (64 cells), designed for the simultaneous loading of 4 different types of missiles, HQ-9B SAM systems, anti-submarine and anti-ship missiles YJ-62, long-range missiles of the DH-10 type for attacks on coastal targets.
      Anti-aircraft: SAM HQ-9V, short-range air defense systems FL3000
      Electronic: Type 346 Radar with Active Phased Array and Type 518 L-Range Long Range Radar.


      1. spravochnik
        spravochnik 1 December 2015 10: 18 New
        +3
        This is no longer the newest and most powerful EM PLA. The Chinese are developing the construction of type 55 EM, the main enemy of which is the American "Zumwalt".
        1. Duke
          Duke 1 December 2015 22: 16 New
          +1
          Quote: spravochnik
          This is no longer the newest and most powerful EM PLA. The Chinese are developing the construction of type 55 EM, the main enemy of which is the American "Zumwalt".

          Type 055 destroyers - A series of promising Chinese large missile destroyers of the 4th generation. On December 27, 2014, the ceremony of starting the construction of the first ship was held. The destroyers of this project will be the largest in the world after the American destroyers of the Zumwalt type.
          It is reported that in this project the advanced technologies of Aegis, the destroyers of the previous generation of the 052D type, will be used to the maximum.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 December 2015 06: 39 New
    +4
    Quote: ruslan
    tired of these wet dreams

    I don’t know what your personal dreams are. But I do not understand such an aggressive neglect of China and, which is typical of the Russian Pacific Fleet
    our tf weak will not be "yet", but for a long, long time

    And whoever merges the information to whom and in what sizes is probably not for you to judge, and so is the military relationship between Russia and China. Or would you like China to harness its armed forces wherever we show interest?
    Without a minus, but I do not agree with your comment.
    1. Ruslan
      Ruslan 1 December 2015 07: 45 New
      +4
      1. I do not neglect either China or tof. I just really look at things, not trying to come up with something that is not there, but I would like to.
      2. In order for the Chinese fleet to transmit information to us about spotted submarines, ships, Amer aircraft, and others, we must have some kind of agreement on the exchange of information on this topic. don't you find? didn’t hear something about this or are you up to date? and there’s no point in securing such cooperation.
      you somehow mischievously understand me. I cannot want China to participate in Russian affairs, since China is our competitor. China generally never harnesses for Russia, it does not even give loans to our banks or conditions are impracticable, in fact, supporting Western sanctions, not just in words but in deeds.
      that's why I don't like it when people pour a beautiful and desirable, but absolutely not real tale about the "great Moscow-Beijing alliance" into their ears.
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 1 December 2015 08: 23 New
        -2
        in fact, supporting the sanctions of the West, not in words but in deed.

        You are in vain. First of all, China supports us in the international arena (even when it abstains from voting directed against Russia at the UN). Secondly, we have good economic and trade relations (although trade with the United States in China is much higher). And thirdly, today Russia certainly can not be afraid of a Chinese blow to the back. And what will happen next, time will tell. Then Russia and China will be possibly different.
        1. Mexovoy
          Mexovoy 1 December 2015 15: 06 New
          +1
          http://sputnik-georgia.ru/economy/20151130/229289171.html
        2. Killj
          Killj 1 December 2015 17: 02 New
          +1
          Quote: rotmistr60
          China, first, supports us in the international arena

          this verbal support is beneficial for China so far ... and then, with the United States, huge turnover and no common borders with wealth. They are already drawing maps with the "primordially Chinese Far East."
  5. Zomanus
    Zomanus 1 December 2015 06: 47 New
    +2
    Well, look at the reaction of China,
    when he has to clash with Yap and Amers in his waters.
    Although given how tightly China is tied to them,
    everything will be at the level of threats and screams.
  6. Mera joota
    Mera joota 1 December 2015 07: 14 New
    +2
    Perspective PKR for the most powerful destroyer of the PRC Navy will put Washington in its place

    The author is evolving, nevertheless he began to use fewer abbreviations ... That's just really wishful thinking. Why would the Americans have to "fall into place" (where is it by the way?) From the Chinese copy of the domestic two-stage Caliber, which has been known for more than twenty years? Why didn't they fall into place earlier?
  7. Nikita Orlov
    Nikita Orlov 1 December 2015 08: 58 New
    +3
    Strange logic about the "friends" of the Chinese. The Germans not only speak Damansky to us (there will be more examples, there are millions so for 10 losses?), Since the early Middle Ages they have been "clawing" with us, the crusaders, 1941 and nothing, they consider friends, many are ready to take the "German", only the "podgopnik" would be comfortable.
    And the attitude of the nemchury (and of the whole geyrope) to us, there is nothing to say, what is called "through clenched teeth"

    Objectivity for the sake of.
    1. Azitral
      Azitral 1 December 2015 10: 45 New
      +1
      I can’t recall something: is there at least one people in Europe who wouldn’t come to visit us with weapons? If not on their own, so in the coalition? I can only remember Greece and Serbia. Even the Bulgarians, although they fought on the opposite side, the Germans did not use them directly against the Russians, were smart enough.
      1. Karlovar
        Karlovar 1 December 2015 14: 51 New
        0
        And Serbs, and Croats, and Bosnians, etc. went as part of the Austro-Hungarian troops in the 1st World ....
  8. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 1 December 2015 09: 36 New
    0
    China must be fully exploited for geopolitical balance. However, one must be careful with it. It often throws "surprises". This has been demonstrated consistently. They will not become a full-fledged military power, but in some areas unexpected decisions can be expected.
    1. Azitral
      Azitral 1 December 2015 10: 46 New
      +2
      Why not? Just do not give arguments like: "They are not fighters in life." Everything changes.
      1. PROXOR
        PROXOR 1 December 2015 11: 10 New
        -2
        Because China never knew how to fight. From pokon centuries it was conquered by all and sundry. They were forced to build the Great Wall of China in order to protect themselves from the Mongol raids. Of course you can say it now. That China is different now and its technical equipment is many times better. I agree. But armament is nothing without a normal soldier. In 1979 during the Sino-Vietnam War. Having a numerical and technical superiority, the PLA could not break the resistance of the Vietnam militia and border guards in a week. Hence the conclusion. In a direct clash, the Chinese soldier remains a soldier until the first salvos of the God of War on them !!!!
        1. Karlovar
          Karlovar 1 December 2015 14: 59 New
          -2
          The great migration of peoples with the subsequent fall of western Rome happened because the Chinese piled on the Huns and drove them to the west ... The Huns (the thunderstorm of Europe), fleeing to the west, thrashed all the tribes and peoples (Turkic, Iranian-speaking, Finno-Ugric, Slavic, Germanic, Romanesque, Koro
          Th-all in a row) ... And Europe at that time was saved only by the sudden death of Attila ....
          1. PROXOR
            PROXOR 1 December 2015 15: 30 New
            -1
            Quote: Karlovar
            The great migration of peoples with the subsequent fall of western Rome happened because the Chinese piled on the Huns and drove them to the west ... The Huns (the thunderstorm of Europe), fleeing to the west, thrashed all the tribes and peoples (Turkic, Iranian-speaking, Finno-Ugric, Slavic, Germanic, Romanesque, Koro

            Th-all in a row) ... And Europe at that time was saved only by the sudden death of Attila ....

            I have already presented above about the battles between Vietnam and China.
  9. donavi49
    donavi49 1 December 2015 10: 50 New
    +5
    Well, there will definitely not be unification with 054, there is Calm-1 vertical.

    But you can put firewood (inclined start) on small 056 (4 rockets) and on 054А, and on 052В / С and even on later 051.

    By the way, what about how to build destroyers. To the construction of destroyers pr.052D after the Shanghai Jiangnan-Changxing shipyard, the Dalian shipyard also joined. First of destroyers being built there was launched the other day. Together with Shanghai, I think it’s already the eighth destroyer of this project.

    Yes, they are in level as a frigate 22350 even with these Caliber, but they are already There are 2 in the PLA, 3 is still in the final stage, and 8 has been launched! Unlike Gorshkov + Kasatonov, who is waiting for his repaired turbine until the fall of the 2016 year (that is, it will go on testing no earlier than the 2017 year).
  10. PROXOR
    PROXOR 1 December 2015 10: 59 New
    +3
    I don’t understand it. Import substitution is certainly good, but our Pacific Fleet is catastrophically short of surface ships. And we are not building them because there are no gas turbine units of our own. Koi stayed in Usrain. Before the revolution, the Russian Empire did not hesitate to order warships in other countries. China rivets itself destroyers as scalded. Maybe, all the same, it’s enough to proudly strike the ceiling with our noses and will we order at least gas turbine units from China? I’m silent about the full-fledged corps under our armament. USC only throws slogans. But the situation is getting worse and worse from year to year.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 1 December 2015 11: 22 New
      +1
      Quote: PROXOR
      Maybe, all the same, it’s enough to proudly strike the ceiling with our noses and will we order at least gas turbine units from China?

      EMNIP, under the terms of the license agreement, the Chinese cannot sell "on the side" of the gas turbine engine.
      But the Chinese diesel engines on our ships have already been announced.
      1. PROXOR
        PROXOR 1 December 2015 12: 48 New
        +2
        Quote: Alexey RA
        EMNIP, under the terms of the license agreement, the Chinese cannot sell "on the side" of the gas turbine engine.
        But the Chinese diesel engines on our ships have already been announced.

        For the Chinese, this is not a problem for mine. Let them say that the power plant was developed in China. And let them send us. So China, what's the difference when the loot is paid.
        Or the second option. To establish the production of these with the help of China. To unfasten the percentage to China and rivet these engines until we establish our own production.
    2. Karlovar
      Karlovar 1 December 2015 15: 27 New
      0
      Moreover, Chinese shipyards are not 100% loaded ....
  11. van zai
    van zai 1 December 2015 11: 04 New
    -1
    That's when China stamp these same destroyers, then sing the derambo. I think the United States does not sit idly by. The defense budget is not the smallest. Since the author "sang" about the PRC's PERSPECTIVE armament, then it must also be compared with the promising "trick" of the United States.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 1 December 2015 11: 23 New
      +4
      The Chinese are stamping modern ships quickly and orderly, almost like cars.

      In the Pacific, an unprecedented arms race between China with one
      sides and the United States, the British Commonwealth, Japan - on the other.
      Look at the US military budget - ground forces are down,
      The Air Force begins to save (reduce the purchase of F-35), but on the fleet (especially submarines)
      and cruise missiles (JASSM and its marine version of LRASM) are getting more and more money.
  12. qwert
    qwert 1 December 2015 12: 10 New
    0
    "Su-35S equipped with the Russian Aerospace Forces. 6 full-fledged Su-35S units equipped with N035 Irbis-E and TRDDF AL-41F1 radar will be transferred. Apparently, the aircraft will be used for the most complex and dangerous air operations over Yuzhno - By the Chinese sea and near the borders of Taiwan and the Diaoyutai archipelago, where the appearance of American F-22A fighters is possible. " May they drag them down and begin to rivet them themselves. And they will do a couple of hundred, and not 12 pieces as is customary in Russia.
    1. PROXOR
      PROXOR 1 December 2015 12: 53 New
      +1
      China does not have its own engines. Even a 5th generation Chinese fighter flies with AL-31F engines. And at 35m there is AL-41F1S and now the 117C product is being tested. And copy the radar technology is not a chip to copy. There are codes, algorithms. By the time China can copy at least AFAR, the T-50 will go to our units.
  13. X Y Z
    X Y Z 1 December 2015 12: 52 New
    0
    Frankly annoying me is the reaction to our national tragedy and the unanimity of the representative of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Hong Lei, who called Turkish aggression an “accident”, probably no one expected such tolerance (this is simply unacceptable and disgusting from China, a strategic and ideological partner)


    So this is understandable. The Turks are the leading participants in the Chinese "silk road" and pragmatic China will not butt with them because of Russia's problems. But the Chinese did not take into account the peculiarities of the Turkish mentality and no matter how it backfired on them in the future.
  14. silver_roman
    silver_roman 1 December 2015 12: 52 New
    +3
    this is simply unacceptable and disgusting from China, a strategic and ideological partner

    bye .... where did you get such stupidity? China will never be our friend and partner. EVERYTHING that he does is for selfish ends. And besides, China and the Russian Federation have an agreement on areas of influence. China does not crawl onto BV, and we do not crawl into Africa.
  15. kovalev2015
    kovalev2015 1 December 2015 17: 01 New
    0
    A strange article ... India enters the BRICS and at the same time in the same team with the United States and other rubbish? I don’t believe it - it’s nonsense, and the Chinese themselves are worthless warriors and with hee thousand warnings from the USA ..
  16. mvg
    mvg 1 December 2015 18: 12 New
    +1
    The most important sign of the growing military and strategic presence of the West in the Asia-Pacific region and the Indian Ocean is the rapid renewal of the Royal Air Force and Navy of Australia, which are signing new contracts with the American defense corporations for the purchase of models of military equipment

    Australia, along with Britain, has ALWAYS been the staunchest ally of the states in the Pacific Ocean.
    RCC YJ-18 is the Chinese equivalent of the Russian RCC 3M14E Caliber-NK. The missile has similar performance characteristics, so on the marching flight section the speed can reach 1100 km / h, and on approach to the target - up to 3000 km / h

    Most likely we are talking about the RCC version of the Caliber 3M54E. Range up to 300 km.
    There has just been an article about new versions of Harpoons and LRASMs. It will be hard for the Chinese. This will not solve the problem, I do not believe in air defense 052C and 052D based on HQ-9B and FL3000. Yes, and KUG, coupled with frigates 054 (with CALM), can’t cope with a volley of a couple of hundred LRASMs, and the Americans will easily reach such a density.
    In particular, this is achieved at the expense of the Indian Air Force and Navy, which are armed with more than 200 Su-30MKI and several hundreds of the most powerful anti-ship missiles BraMos

    200 Su-30MKI is great, of course. Only where are several hundred BrahMos from? There is no air yet, not tested (accordingly, it is hardly produced), BrahMos NK, on ​​the destroyers D 63 Kolkata (series of 3 units), in my opinion, BrahMos and Barak-8 were going to "stick" there. Only the lead ship is tested. Ground "BrahMos" - and the Chinese have a bunch of YJ-62 (82) and the like. And in terms of the number of modern aircraft, China will at least not yield to India (Rafalkoff is not yet there, Super Bumblebees are on aircraft carriers, they still need to catch up, minus the DF-21A radius, minus the number and many more factors).
    At the same time, India from China has already "raked" in full!
    It is also necessary to increase the naval composition of the Navy of the People's Republic of China, because there are currently only four most modern EMs at 052D in the fleet, and six at 052s; the pace is not impressive.

    The speed with which the Chinas build, India can only envy, and the United States too ... with what together ..
    These that dance (dark and beautiful), in general, built a national tank for 40 years ..
    And Pakistan will "fit in" for China. A vigorous power that has been sharpening its teeth on India for a long time
    PS: And, most importantly, in my opinion, the author missed it. Missile armament of BRMD, MRBM, tactical nuclear weapons, in China, clearly exceeds the capabilities of mainland India, Korea, Japan, Vietnam. Plus strategic nuclear submarine type. 093. And who will "seriously" climb a nuclear country? Which is the ONLY one in the world preparing for a nuclear winter, has 500 ghost towns, underground airfields and factories?
    And anyway, what is AMERICA? By 2030-2040, the United States in Asia-Pacific will be quoted less than China (if we survive)
  17. sub307
    sub307 1 December 2015 19: 01 New
    +1
    "The reaction is frankly annoying me ..." And you do not be "annoyed", because, as you yourself will notice, "after all, the PRC today continues to control every step of the Navy of the main world aggressor in the southern strategic direction, where we do not have such an opportunity yet." Therefore, China is completely independent in its reaction to whatever was, and in "eternal love" for us, they "did not swear." Collaborate because it is profitable. When we will be able to control someone else, then we can allow ourselves to be “irritated”.
  18. Dam
    Dam 1 December 2015 19: 08 New
    0
    The Chinese, at a minimum, divert some of the resources of the United Matrasistan. What are they allies, but hell knows, see. At a minimum, they are more adequate than arrogant Saxons and do not consider it possible to survive in nuclear explosions. And yet, China has never captured anyone, its way of survival is to dissolve the invaders in itself. And so, as you know, the allies of the Unas Army and Fleet
  19. DDsurgut
    DDsurgut 1 December 2015 22: 47 New
    +1
    China armed with us may well hit in the back like churkistan
  20. Fei_Wong
    Fei_Wong 2 December 2015 22: 36 New
    +1
    China is no longer an ally (well, let's just say, not a strategic, reliable ally). Now he is "a little man on his own mind," as they say. Fortunately, in many ways our geo- and simply political interests coincide. But it's still not worth comparing it with Turkey. Unlike the Turks, with whom we have always been historical opponents, in China they still remember too well what he owes to Russian help and generosity in the most difficult years for him. Let the friendship faded after the death of Stalin (thanks to Khrushchev ... and for the "gift" of the Russian Crimea for the anniversary of the Ukrainian SSR, he is thanked a hundredfold! So that the devils "Kuzkin's mother" were shown to him for such gifts too).
    After all, China is not an ungrateful "litter of Europe" for you - Poland (although Miss Ruina-404 has already successfully replaced it in the field of "litter of the USA"). But at least he is not our enemy.
  21. iov
    iov 16 December 2015 07: 36 New
    0
    Quote: Duke
    Quote: spravochnik
    This is no longer the newest and most powerful EM PLA. The Chinese are developing the construction of type 55 EM, the main enemy of which is the American "Zumwalt".

    Type 055 destroyers - A series of promising Chinese large missile destroyers of the 4th generation. On December 27, 2014, the ceremony of starting the construction of the first ship was held. The destroyers of this project will be the largest in the world after the American destroyers of the Zumwalt type.
    It is reported that in this project the advanced technologies of Aegis, the destroyers of the previous generation of the 052D type, will be used to the maximum.

    Aegis at the Navy of China ... Hmm. Funny