'Russian nationalism' ™ is the technology of removing Russians from history

16
'Russian nationalism' ™ is the technology of removing Russians from history

So, the “Russian nationalism” is not true that today it is for Russians the banner of defeatism and for the USA an instrument of hyper-Empire for the destruction of statehood and subjectivity of Russia.

First of all, I want to ask someone who decided to read this article, to pay attention to the abundance of references in it to others and my own articles and books. This makes reading difficult, but it makes it possible for anyone who really wants to understand the problem, study theses and arguments, in particular, study and analyze the foundations of the position of the author of this article.

Now about the “Russian nationalism”.

Why do I enclose this expression “Russian nationalism” in quotes? Because today it denotes a specially made brand, for which concept, ideologems, falsified story and other technical elements of the institutional weaponsi.e. weapons of consciousness (http://www.dataforce.net/~metuniv/consor/title.htm) - and, above all, the Russian consciousness.

“Russian nationalism”, as well as one hundred and fifty years ago, “Ukrainian nationalism” (http://www.russ.ru/politics/20010406-man.html and www.specnaz.ru/archive/07.2000/11.htm) , as well as “Bosnian” (in Yugoslavia), “Uigur” (in China) and other similar nationalisms, created in laboratories that are engaged in scrapping self-determination and identification of the population in order to destroy statehood - in this case, Russian.

“Ukrainian nationalism” a century and a half ago, the guardians of the Austro-Hungarian Empire fabricated, on the one hand, to retain the unconnected peoples and, on the other hand, oppose different people to each other and, thus, simplify the power of the ruling, the empire’s business (“ Divide and rule "said at least two thousand years ago). Poland then, as now, was used as the most interested party and many things were done by the Polish “hands”.

Currently, “Ukrainian nationalism” is made in the USA, Europe and Poland (http://www.rosbalt.ru/2005/01/16/191691.html) with the goal of separating Ukraine from Russia - this is primarily about “ large "of Russia - a single space within the boundaries of 1945-th year. History is not repeated for the first time. For example, in the 1939 year, six months before the start of the Second World War, the question of creating a “Great Ukraine” was raised in Germany - this was how they were getting ready to organize the soon-needed “Ukrainian nationalism”.

The technology of any brand is the same everywhere - creating an artificial temporary community around a fictitious and false name, the entrance fee to which is the rejection of its own tradition and identity. If for the organization of financial control of a foreign state at the end of the last century, the mechanism of “currency management” was invented (Currency Board - www.kroupnov.ru/5/58_1.shtml), then identification identification mechanisms were created to crush consciousness and false identities. - www.kroupnov.ru/5/60_1.shtml).

An elegant analysis of the fresh material of such brand-production can be found in Anton Ivanov’s article “Tajik Girl ™ as a fetish of“ Russian fascism ”(http://www.rosbalt.ru/2004/06/04/164502.html). By the way, all these fetish brands (“Russian nationalism” ™, “Russian fascism” ™, etc.) can be safely stuck, as Anton did, the trademark sign ™, since it is a brand and since it is promoted exclusively in other people's vested interests.

The philosophical, methodological and technological foundations of nationalism as a false and destructive ideology are detailed and generally understood in the works of Benedict Anderson "Imagined Communities", - www.russ.ru/krug/kniga/99-06-03/zasursky. htm and www.russ.ru/krug/20011126.html), Ernst Gellner (Nations and Nationalism, see also - azbuk.net/cgi-bin/az/az_book.cgi?aut_id=2668&book_id=9630&type=html) , R.V. Manekin (http://manekin.narod.ru/natio.htm) and a huge number of other researchers (http://old.iea.ras.ru/Russian/personnel/Tishkov/forget.html).

The harm of nationalism to Russia is especially unconditional. This is due to the fact that historically, from the very beginning, Russia developed as a multi-ethnic statehood, and the Russians turned out to be not only a state-forming special people, which is not an ethnos, not a nation or even a “people”, but a super-ethnos (http: //www.kroupnov. ru / 5 / 126_1.shtml) or a super-people (http://www.cmnews.ru/news.asp?nid=1505&t=1&nd=16&nm=1&ny=2005), uniting and absorbing up to one and a half hundred peoples.

And in Russia always, and especially after the Great Patriotic War and the Soviet “mixing” (which was not the American “melting pot”, melting pot), there was a “great family of nations” (http://www.kroupnov.ru/5 /61_1.shtml) by A.S. Pushkin), when all the peoples of Russia became Russian.

After all, Russian is not a characteristic of "blood" or genes in the literal sense. Russian is the ability to serve Russian statehood (http://www.pereplet.ru/text/krupnov09aug02.html) and Russian culture, Easter culture (http://www.pereplet.ru/text/nepomnyashiy/nep13.htm).

It happened in history and precisely because of this, Russia is a unique civilization (http://patriotica.ru/religion/kozhinov_ros_civ.html). Therefore, Russians have never been and cannot be a nation, and Russia does not and cannot have a national idea (http://patriotica.ru/religion/kozhinov_idea.html).

That is why “Russian nationalism” ™ is for Russians the most effective way to destroy the foundations of their historical existence, their “roots”, their “soil” and destiny, their own, as genetics say, the genome, because through “Russian nationalism” Russians produce themselves genetically modified and become genetically modified population (like genetically modified food, GM - www.kroupnov.ru/5/57_1.shtml), which poses no danger to anyone in the world.

“Russian nationalism” is used as a technology for the production of genetically modified peoples at the same time as another, it would seem, directly opposite brand technology “Western liberalism” (http://www.kroupnov.ru/5/57_1.shtml).

But if the latter is described in sufficient detail in terms of “Westernization”, “Americanization”, etc., then “Russian nationalism” did not understand, but, on the contrary, the interest of those leaders who organized the struggle for it consciously and artificially expanded. with “Russian fascism” and “Russian anti-Semitism” - exactly the same brand technologies as “Russian nationalism” and from the same laboratories.

“Russian nationalism” is needed today by those who implement the program of global domination and domination, primarily in the form of the US hyper-empire (http://www.kroupnov.ru/pubs/2006/02/13/10314/).

According to this program, the most effective and convenient ordering of the world in the interests of transnational capital and the United States will be if it succeeds in splitting and dismembering all existing civilizations and historical statehoods such as Russia-USSR, China, Iran, but not haphazardly blowing them up, and easily dividing controlled and controlled units (units) in the form of "national states". I again use quotation marks, since it is, of course, not those classic nation-state states that arose naturally in Europe in the 16th and 19th centuries, but artificial quasi-national states or simply pseudo-states. devoid of sovereignty.

This process in Anglo-Saxon geopolitics has a stable terminological designation - nation building or nation building (nation-building - www.kroupnov.ru/5/59_1.shtml).

The main task that “Russian nationalism” ™ is intended to perform as part of the construction of someone else’s hyper-empire is to a) destroy Russian statehood, “big” Russia, and b) Russian corral on any type of reservation “Moskovia”, Central District of the Russian Federation or another bandustan under the approximate name Rusistan.

The first part of the task “Russian nationalism” ™ performed well in 1989 - 1991.

Here we must not forget the role of the Communist Party of the Russian Communist Party - the Russian Communist Party, in which the leader of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation G. Zyuganov was promoted to fight against the "anti-people regime" ™. The collapse of the CPSU as a systemic force of the state of the USSR, as a “clamp” of the USSR began with the RCP. And it was not by chance that the ideology of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation began to be a strange mixture of Trotskyist global communism with thick nationalism.

We must also remember the role of the deputy head of the Rodina Duma faction, S. Baburin, whose party (Narodnaya Volya) is currently merging with the Rodina party. It was Baburin who authored the idea of ​​the Declaration on State Sovereignty of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. It was this declaration, adopted by 12 June 1990 of the year, that laid the legal and organizational beginning for the defeat of the USSR.

It is equally important to recall the booklet by A. I. Solzhenitsyn “How to equip Russia”, published by multimillion copies in September 1990 of the year, where he actually put forward and thoroughly substantiated the doctrine of the need for the collapse of the USSR and the Russian nazibildinga in the form of “Russian Union”.

A large volume quotation from this brochure is needed: “... As early as the beginning of the century, our large state mind S.Е. Kryzhanovsky foresaw: “Indigenous Russia does not have the stock of cultural and moral forces to assimilate all the margins. This depletes the Russian national core. ” But that was said - in a rich, flourishing country, and above all the millions of extermination of your people, and not blindly in a row, but with the Russian selection that was deliberately picked out.

And today it sounds with a thousandfold meaning: we have no forces on the outskirts, neither economic forces, nor spiritual ones. We do not have the strength to the Empire! - and it is not necessary, and she fell off our shoulders: she crushes us, and sucks, and accelerates our death.

I see with dismay that the awakening Russian national self-consciousness, in many ways, cannot get rid of the wide-minded thinking, the imperial dope, adopted the exaggerated “Soviet patriotism” that never existed from the Communists and is proud of that “great Soviet power” ...

To keep a great empire means to die out your own people. Why this variegated alloy? - so that Russians lose their unique face? We should strive not for the breadth of the State, but for the clarity of our spirit in the rest of it ...

... And so - even more straightened out from the oppressive load of the "Central Asian underbelly," the equally ill-considered conquest of Alexander II, he would rather have spent these forces on the unfinished building of his reforms, on the birth of a genuinely national zemstvo.

Our philosopher of this century, Iv. A. Ilyin wrote that the spiritual life of a people is more important than the coverage of its territory or even economic wealth; the recovery and well-being of the people are incomparably more expensive than any prestigious external goals ... ”(http://teljonok.chat.ru/nam/kak.htm).

Thought A.I. Solzhenitsyn is transparent: for the sake of "indigenous Russia" I don’t feel sorry for "territory or even economic wealth."

Today, Solzhenitsyn’s Doctrine to Muscovy, absolutely coinciding with the program of the US hyperimnia, is moving to its second realization stage.

Now it is necessary to crush the Russian Federation and finally organize a reservation or bandustan for the Russians.

I recall that bandustans are “independent states” within South Africa during the apartheid period, artificially created for the purpose of settling indigenous races and tribes in different territories.

The ideological, political and legal (so far, fortunately, in the form of bills like the “Law on the Russian People” - www.pravoslavie.ru/rusdom/200107/23.htm) the basis for the second stage of the mobilization of “national identity” has long been a member of the presidium Party “Rodina” MP A. Chuyev and member of the Party “Rodina” MP A. Krutov. They are convinced that the main thing is to fight for the rights of Russians, for Russian autonomy, and everything else is third-rate. The Russians will have their own Rusistan, like the Tatars of Tatarstan - everything will be (http://www.lgz.ru/690).

Sending their reasoning is that there is a “Russian question in Russia” (http://www.pravoslavie.ru/rusdom/200107/23.htm and www.lgz.ru/690). Such a statement itself should be considered monstrous, since already from this formula the “Russian question in Russia” it follows that the “Russian question” can be outside of Russia and without Russia and after Russia. But without Russia there was not and never will be any Russians. Or they, in fact, need only Rusistan and no matter where - in Muscovy or in Tanzania, for example.

However, this Rusistan, the rights of the “Russian nation”, which would be equal to the rights of the Tatar nation or the Adyghe nation (http://www.pravoslavie.ru/rusdom/200107/23.htm), has long been raving the whole “advanced Russian national” thought .

Those who want to get to know each other better should study the works of A. Sevostyanov (http://globalrus.ru/satire/139489/), E. Kholmogorov, K. Krylov, S. Gorodnikov (the most sincere and consistent “Russian nationalist”) or who joined them Liberal Y. Amosov (http://globalrus.ru/opinions/139197/) and a host of other left and right "Russian" or "Russian nationalists".

New elegant versions of the Solzhenitsyn doctrine "Forward, to Muscovy!" Appear. What is, for example, the next most recent passage: “Creating a compact ethnic core of a state-forming nation on the territory of the Russian Federation, stalking the Russian people into Russia“ heim in Reich ”, retaining the existing borders, as opposed to fruitless, harmful and disorienting dreams of an imminent imperial revenge - that's the only thing realistic content of Russian politics in the coming decades until, at least, it is impossible to improve the country's heart demographically ”(http://www.russ.ru/culture/20050109-pr.html).

The basis of this voluntary nationalization, or even the nationalization of Russians, lies not only in understandable bitterness and infringement (in a degrading country it concerns everyone, not just “Russian nationalists”), but, above all, in their recognition of the historical defeat of Russians and Russia. And the logic becomes clear: if the Russians were the superethnos and holders of the state, now the Russians are the subethnos and we have no choice but to organize our national liberation movement along the lines of Africa and Asia of the last century. That is, “Russian nationalism” is the doctrine of the losers, confident of their own and all Russian defeat. And with their small-scale defeat, they want to make all Russians happy.

Therefore, it turns out that behind all of this is the desire shared by our numerous “friends” on the globe, so that the Russians and Russia can get out of the world, “stretch” somewhere. A. Prokhanov expresses very precisely similar interior aspirations in the January editorial of “Tomorrow”: “To force a confused President to choose a“ country ”rather than a“ world ”(http://zavtra.ru/cgi//veil//data/zavtra/05 /582/11.html).

And how many do not distinguish between “true” and “false” nationalisms (http://patriotica.ru/religion/trub_nation.html) according to N. Trubetskoy, between “healthy”, “true” and “unhealthy” (http: // patriotica.ru/religion/ilin_nat.html) or "Christian" and "pagan" (http://www.rne.iks.ru/stat/hristnat.htm) nationalism according to Ivan Ilyin (who is constantly quoted by all "Russian nationalists" ) any, absolutely any nationalism today and “Russian nationalism”, in the first place, is anti-Russian in nature and is the death of Russia (http://www.kroupnov.ru/5/116_1.shtml).

So, the “Russian nationalism” is not true that today it is for Russians the banner of defeatism and for the USA an instrument of hyper-Empire for the destruction of statehood and subjectivity of Russia. This is because nationalism is today the main instrument of supranational states in the world, first of all, the US hyperimeria, to ensure its global hegemony by turning other countries into pseudo-sovereign democratic nations, into a kind of building bricks or cubes of global order being built.

From here, the International being built on the globe under the auspices of the United States, the International should be called national not a class alliance between and besides nations (what the International was), but a well-structured set of separate nations (a separate and difficult question here is the current role of the UN and how it will be played by the United States and Great Britain). The slogan of the beginning of the last century, "Proletarians of all countries, unite!", Was replaced by the slogan of the beginning of this century, "Long live the nations of all continents and peoples!" And the basic process of organizing a global national is not the world revolution, but the system of many national revolutions, such as those that were organized in the republics of Yugoslavia, in Georgia, in Ukraine.

Nationalism led to the collapse of the USSR. And it is precisely the current nationalists who are all together in fact, regardless of their beliefs and experiences, are trying to bring the collapse of the USSR to its logical end - to the collapse of the Russian Federation, because behind this “board” “Russian nationalism” are not the Russians, but the Global National (http: //www.kroupnov.ru/5/59_1.shtml).

Today, the Global or World National is put in place of the 30 Internationals as a destructive statehood (see the relevant chapter in www.rosbalt.ru/2005/01/16/192262.html). And this “Russian nationalism” is a modern form of Trotskyism.

Only this “instrumental”, “technical” lie of “Russian nationalism” ™ is enough for everyone to make the final choice between nationalism and Russia.

But nationalism in the beginning of the XXI century is wrong and ontologically.

Russia has never been and cannot be a nation state.

Russia has always been, is and will be a power (http://www.pereplet.ru/krupnov/31.html#31): by a special “great island of Russia”, by the Third Rome after the monk Philotheus and Ivan the Terrible (http: // www. archipelag.ru/geopolitics/osnovi/island/civilization/?...ersion=forprint), the Universal Monarchy by F.I. Tyutchev (http://www.pereplet.ru/krupnov/15.html#15), the only and the first in the world "socialism in a single country" by I.V. Stalin (http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Parliament/7231/alexandr/alex_0.htm) and a world power in the XXI century (http://smd.kroupnov.ru/).

And here, meaningless references to a nation as an ethnic category and a nation as a state organizing category are meaningless. An ethnos that has always achieved domination always stands behind any nation-state; there is simply no other way. And the Russians are not an ethnos or a nation. And Russia is not a national state and cannot be, since it can exist only within the framework of the initial world actions and the category of not national interests, but world-wide historical principles (http://www.rosbalt.ru/2004/11/08/184321 .html).

Russian as a multinational superethnos or supernatural, formed through the ministry of the Russian statehood, through the preservation of Russia in World History, have a unique “design” and any summing up of this design under someone else's “standards” and “drawings” is disastrous. That is why the efforts to destroy the Russian consciousness, which is necessary in order to drive the Russians into the “Muscovy” type gangster reservation, are aimed at hitting the key elements of this structure.

By the way, this was very well understood at the beginning of the last century by I.V. Stalin. He was a recognized leader among the members of the RSDLP and the CPSU (b) on the national issue. And the main thought of Stalin was always not to recognize nationalism as the main form of political organization for Russia-USSR, in particular, behind the social democrat Bauer with his doctrine “the rights of nations neither self-determination up to separation” (http: //www.magister.msk.ru/library/stalin/4-2.htm) and always consider the national question "not in isolation, but in close connection with the question of the victory of the revolution, as part of the general question of the revolution" (http: / /www.magister.msk.ru/library/stalin/7-5.htm), that is, translated into modern language, see in the national problem ke only a portion, and a secondary part, the issue of statehood ( "revolution" in 1925 year).

It is not by chance that V. Lenin once called Georgian (Ossetian?) Stalin “a crude Great Russian captain”, because “he (Lenin) was aware of the excesses of the chauvinists in the Caucasus, who had issued a decree depriving Georgian citizenship of people who marry residents of other republics. However, he considered Great-Russian chauvinism to be much more evil, calling Stalin "a crude Great-Russian world morim" (http://www.history.pu.ru/biblioth/russhist/histsovruss/02.htm).

If you ponder why Lenin put it this way and study the situation well, it becomes clear that "Great Russian chauvinism" actually had nothing to do with chauvinism or nationalism and was an obvious defense of Russian statehood - at that time the USSR.

Indicative are the words of Stalin during his meeting with the aircraft designer A. Yakovlev 26 March 1941 of the year: “No, we are right that we punish nationalists of all stripes and colors so severely. They are the best helpers of our enemies and the worst enemies of their own nations. After all, the nationalists' cherished dream is to split the Soviet Union into separate “national” states, and then it will become easy prey for enemies. The peoples inhabiting the Soviet Union, for the most part, will be physically exterminated, the rest, some will turn into dumb and pathetic slaves of the conquerors. It is not by chance that the despicable traitors of the Ukrainian people - the leaders of the Ukrainian nationalists, all these millers, konovalians, Bandera have already received the task of German intelligence to stir up among Ukrainians who are Russians, hate Russians and seek separation of Ukraine from the Soviet Union. The same old song of ancient times from the period of the Roman Empire: divide and conquer. Especially succeeded in inciting national hatred and incitement of one people against other Englishmen.

Thanks to such tactics, bribing the miserable and corrupt leaders of various nations, capitalist island England - the first factory of the world, negligible in size, managed to seize vast territories, enslave and rob many nations of the world, create a "Great" British Empire, in which, boastfully say the British, the sun never sets. With us, this number, while we are alive, will not work. So in vain Hitler's fools call the Soviet Union a “house of cards”, which allegedly collapses during the first serious ordeal, reckon on the fragility of the friendship of the peoples inhabiting our country today, hoping to embroil them with each other. In the event of a German attack on the Soviet Union, people of different nationalities who inhabit our country will defend it, sparing no life as their beloved homeland. However, nationalists should not be underestimated. If allowed to act with impunity, they will bring a lot of trouble. That is why they should be kept in the iron grip, not letting them undermine the unity of the Soviet Union ”(http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Parliament/7345/stalin/15-3.htm).

What is the modern principle of action for the destruction of Russian consciousness?

The fact that the Russians, who are the state-forming people, the creators of a unique thousand-year (at least) Russian civilization and Russian statehood, and the unifier of one and a half hundred other peoples (i.e., a super-ethnos (http://www.kroupnov.ru/5/ 126_1.shtml) or a superethnos (http://www.cmnews.ru/news.asp?nid=1505&t=1&nd=16&nm=1&ny=2005), through the technology of “Russian nationalism”, they are sequentially, first, cut off-cut off- cut off from, respectively, the state, civilization, statehood and one and a half hundred peoples and, secondly, opposed to their own state, civilization, statehood and one and a half hundred peoples.

This is done very simply, good reasons for complaints and conflicts, if desired, you can always find a lot.

Let's start with the latter, with the opposition of the Russian peoples of Russia.

This is done on the grounds that the Russians allegedly do not have what others have, for example, Tatars or Adygs. The Tatars have Tatarstan, the Circassians - Adygea, while the Russians do not have their own Rusistan. At the same time, the basically harmful division of territories into “national republics” and “ordinary regions (territories)” by “Russian nationalists” is not considered to be in such an urgent need for Russia that it should stop allocating territories with an incorrectly overestimated and national status, i.e. eliminate these “national republics” —but in that it is necessary to further strengthen this harmful principle of the unequal status of territories and create another one of some other “Russian national republics”.

Further. Russian "bred" with the state.

"Russian nationalists" consistently draw the line that the current state is indifferent to Russians or directly hostile Russians, i.e. anti-Russian state. Further, depending on preferences, stories are added about the fact that this is done by the “Jews”, “Caucasians”, “Freemasons” or “Jewish-Freemasons”, “Zionists”, “American” or “Transnational Forces” and Other agents of influence. "

Here, first of all, one should pay attention to the surprising fact that such an opposition of Russians to the state is very often produced by extremely strange figures. Among them, for example, those who just passed this very state in 1991-th year, being in high ranks in the KGB, the Interior Ministry or the Soviet army. Or those whose appearance is worthy to exemplify the very long-suffering Jewish people - for some reason, they are especially sincere and uncompromisingly pressing on the need for “Russian nationalism”. There are quite a few among the fighters against the anti-Russian state and those who admire Lenin, who took money from the German General Staff for the sake of the revolution.

Further, even simpler: the Russians are contrasted with the Russian State and Russia. Here, ideas are constantly being thrown in that everything, for example, can and even needs to be sacrificed to preserve the “Russian national core” according to Solzhenitsyn of the 1990 model of the year or “create a compact ethnic core of the state-forming people” according to Butakov of the 2005 model of the year. From here, an unhealthy “Russian question in Russia” according to A. Krutov and others also arises.

What follows from all that has been said?

Today, nationalism is a modern form of the collapse of Russian statehood, which has always been based not on a national principle. “Russian nationalism” ™ is used in the ongoing Fifth World War (see the article “My War” (http://www.kroupnov.ru/5/99_1.shtml) against Russia. Therefore, it is unacceptable to support it.

Today I do not see any other doctrine, except for the doctrine of the WORLD POWER www.kroupnov.ru/cgi/comments.cgi?id=3&cat_id=3), which would make it possible to restore our country to the status of the USSR and above and which would not be able to let them erase Russians from history.

A world power is a multinational statehood, which poses world problems that are universally important for all countries and exemplary solves them on its own territory (http://www.kroupnov.ru/5/110_1.shtml).

All US policy now and always is to bring people freedom and democracy in an American way. So, for example, 1 June 2002, on Children's Day, US President J. Bush, speaking to graduates of the famous West Point - the main US Military Academy, that by the end of the last century “only one single model survived progress of mankind "and that it is" West Point is the guardian of those values ​​that shape and educate the soldiers, who, in turn, shape the history of the world. " By this model, he meant, of course, American-style democracy.

The export of such a democracy is carried out through regime change (regime change) in foreign states and the creation of “normal” national states — that is, National Building

As we could see in Ukraine in October - December last year (http://www.rosbalt.ru/2004/12/28/190954.html), nationalism is united with democracy, i.e. the dream of Zbigniew Brzezinski, a leading US geo-strategist of Polish origin, who 2 of December 2004 of the year noted with satisfaction on BBC radio, is coming true: “We witnessed a kind of marriage of Ukrainian nationalism and Ukrainian democracy. In the history of Ukraine there were a lot of nationalist movements, but not all of them were democratic. And now we can talk about the union of Ukrainian patriotism, Ukrainian identity and Ukrainian democracy, freedom and liberalism. I consider this process historically important ”(http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/news/newsid_4062000/4062499.stm).

What is the purpose of the US towards Russia is also clear.

Back in 1996, quite frankly in an interview with the newspaper Segodnya, Brzezinski clearly pointed out exactly what place is given to Russia in the modern "civilized world": Russia is unlikely to become a global power due to the crisis generated by the 70-year domination of communism. Two world wars, forced industrialization and collectivization, competition with the United States fell to the country's share, and this undermined its foundations. Russia, in my opinion, will take a long time to reach the potential that would allow it to become a global power. However, now it can be a major regional power. In the coming 25 years, only a united Europe can become a global partner of the USA ”(“ Today ”, 22.08.96).

“Russian nationalism”, if the conscientious participants of this movement do not come to their senses in time, can bring the matter to the point that Brzezinski still has time to say the same words about the “marriage of nationalism and democracy” about the Russian Federation, which he said about Ukraine last December.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    23 November 2011 11: 48
    A new way to ruin Russia from the inside
    1. +3
      23 November 2011 12: 07
      Not so new.
  2. +4
    23 November 2011 12: 21
    Stalin was right "any manifestation of nationalism should be severely punished"
    I would not want to look at the political punishment of the world in a couple of years not to see the Russian state there
  3. Artemka
    0
    23 November 2011 13: 54
    But they were once one large and powerful country. What a power ruined!
  4. serge
    0
    23 November 2011 14: 07
    Yes, we do not have national parties other than those created by special services
    with provocative goals.
  5. lokdok
    +5
    23 November 2011 14: 51
    Russian nationalism may be bad, but all sorts of mulattos were sick of it, which when they are profitable, they are Russian, and when it is not profitable they are (Jews, Ukrainians, Poles, Hutsuls .... (underline what is necessary)). Therefore, Russians want to identify themselves somehow.
    1. vadimus
      +1
      23 November 2011 17: 35
      To the best of everything is fine. Between pride and lawlessness there is a lot of room for self-awareness
    2. Hutsul
      0
      24 November 2011 22: 22
      By the way, I’m Hutsul :)
  6. dred
    +2
    23 November 2011 16: 27
    In something you are right that nationalism is good in something and bad.
    1. Artemka
      0
      24 November 2011 15: 53
      The main thing is that he does not grow into fascism and so on on the list.
      1. Cossack_SS
        0
        4 March 2012 23: 24
        What is fascism? Fascia (lat. Fasces, "bundle", "unity") or fascina [1] in ancient Rome was called an attribute of state power - a bundle of birch or elm twigs of the same length and width, tied with red cloth or, more often, a leather belt. A similar bundle (with or without an ax (lat. Securis) attached to it) symbolized power, the unity of the people and the law.
        The origin of this symbolism is not clearly defined. Some derive it from the Persian barsman - a bundle of branches of a comb, which was held by the priests of Zoroastrianism in their hands, others - from the state symbolism of the ancient Etruscans, others believe that this is a pure Roman symbol, while the fourth say that several symbolic symbols are connected in fascia symbolism components of various origin, which in ancient Rome merged into what we call fascia.
        Today, fascia is often directly associated with such a phenomenon of the first half of the XNUMXth century as fascism (the name of the latter also came from the fascia) and the regime of Benitto Mussolini, who chose fascia as the main symbol for his movement, however, it should be said that the symbolism of the tied rods is after all, it did not acquire in the eyes of the present world public such a negative meaning, which, for all known reasons, comprehended an even more ancient Indo-European symbol - the swastika.
        The so-called full, standard fascia was created, as it were, from three components: a bunch of wooden rods, most often leather, their bandaging tape, and an ax, which, depending on the circumstances, was either attached to the fascia or stuck into it, then it was absent. Each of these components was endowed with its own meaning and symbolized one or more aspects of fascia symbolism.
        The ancient Greek philosopher, writer and fable writer Aesop (circa 620 - 560 BC) describes the importance and benefits of unity in one of his fables, which tells of a father and his five sons. The sons constantly quarreled among themselves, so the father tied several wooden rods into a bundle and invited each of the sons to break this bundle. No matter how hard the sons tried, none of them managed to do it. Then the father untied the bundle and broke the bars one by one with the words: "So will you. If you live in harmony, no one will defeat you, and if in discord, each will defeat you one by one."
        This ancient Greek wisdom is perfectly conveyed through the symbolism of fascia, in which strong collectivism is opposed to weak individualistic egoism. Thus, the fascia symbolized the unity of the people in a single state, and from the fascia the ax-looking blade was a firm intention to defend the interests of its citizens and the state by all, including military means.
  7. kahtan070988
    0
    23 November 2011 20: 45
    I don’t believe anyone at all, especially the author of this article, who very often refers to one comrade close to the "emperor's" ass!
    1. Galina
      +1
      24 November 2011 03: 49
      kahtan070988 Yesterday, 20:45 new 0
      quote: "I don't trust anyone at all, especially the author of this article,"
      But in vain. The author’s thought is correct. Maybe you just don’t like it, it’s not easy to digest. But try to argue.
  8. Cossack_SS
    +1
    4 March 2012 17: 51
    Intentional discrimination of Russian nationalism! The author of the article is either a fool or a foolish person!

    Webster's authoritative dictionary (US edition, 1987), which is used in all countries of the world without exception, including Russia, defines the concept of "nationalism" as follows:
    1. Devotion to your people.
    2. Protection of national unity or independence.
    Japanese Encyclopedia:
    Nationalism is the universal commitment and loyalty of one’s nation.
    British Encyclopedia:
    Nationalism is loyalty and commitment to a nation or country, when national interests are placed above personal or group interests.
    The American Political Dictionary, which by 1993 had withstood 9 (!) Publications:
    Nationalism is identified with social and psychological forces that arose under the influence of unique cultural, historical factors, in order to ensure unity, inspiration among a given people by cultivating a sense of common belonging to these values. Nationalism unites people who share common cultural, linguistic, racial, historical or geographical traits or experiences and who ensure loyalty to this political community. "

    * * *

    Nationalism is a manifestation of respect, love and devotion, devotion to self-sacrifice in the present, reverence and reverence for the past and the desire for prosperity, glory and success in the future of that nation, the people to which this person belongs. Each member of the nation is a part of the whole, and just as a nation cannot and should not leave its member defenseless and not avenged both inside and outside its place of residence, so part of it, its members, should always be ready to sacrifice themselves for their nationality. Nationalism is often confused with patriotism; however, there is a big difference between them. Nationalism is unlimited love and a willingness to sacrifice for one’s nationality, and patriotism is the same love and willingness to sacrifice for one’s Motherland and Fatherland. Nationalism is rather a psychological-anthropological concept, while patriotism is a historical-geographical concept. Natio - people, patria - fatherland, geographic size, constituting the space occupied by this or that state with its past (p. 45-46).

    National feeling is a natural affiliation of physical and mental organization. It is instinctive. It is obligatory. National consciousness is an act of thinking and stems from the existence of a nation. Over and over, national consciousness is based on the basis of national feeling, but it is not original and is a conscious consequence of the first (p. 42-43)

    The state itself, the executive state machine itself will inevitably have to become national at certain times and under certain conditions, not only in the sense of reflecting the nation as a combined and nationally whole, but even in the sense of reflecting one particular nationality, whose interests are currently dominant position and reflection in the resultant.
    That is why the slogan is now quite legitimate for Russian state power: the state power must be national Russian! .. The Russian national group is not only entitled, but also obliged to present to its government, its state power, the requirement to be national, that is, to protect the political interests of an indigenous nationality, until the indigenous nationality is politically united so as to protect their political interests from unnecessarily unyielding claims of other national groups by their own group forces ... (p. 52)
    .
    Professor P.I. Kovalevsky. Psychology of the Russian nation. SPb., 1915
    A national feeling is a love for the historical appearance and for the creative act of one’s people. Nationalism is a belief in its spiritual and instinctive power; faith in his spiritual calling. Nationalism is the will for the creative flourishing of my people - in earthly affairs and in heavenly accomplishments. Nationalism is the contemplation of his people in the face of God, the contemplation of his history, his soul, his talents, his shortcomings, his spiritual problems, his dangers, his temptations and his achievements. Nationalism is a system of actions arising from this love and faith, from this will and this contemplation. That is why true nationalism can be described as spiritual fire, leading a person to sacrificial service, and people to spiritual prosperity. This is a delight from the contemplation of his people in God's plan, in the gifts of His Grace. Nationalism is thanks to God for these gifts; but he is also grief for his people, if the people are not at the height of these gifts.

    I.A. Ilyin (1883-1954), Russian philosopher and political scientist. "Manifesto of the Russian Movement".

    * * *

    There is no nation that in its life has not sought the affirmation of national pride.

    L.N. Tolstoy, the great Russian writer

    * * *

    "Nationalism in me is so natural that no internationalists will ever knock me out of it."

    Dmitriy Mendeleev. "To the knowledge of Russia". 1906

    Nationalism is the highest phase of the development of patriotism, in which the understanding of the key truth triumphs: the nation is primary, the state is secondary. I will give both definitions that seem to me the best and most true:
    1) "Nationalism is love for one's nation and care for it" (that is, not just love, but active, active love);
    2) "Nationalism is the instinct of self-preservation of the people; this instinct sleeps when the nation is not threatened, but wakes up in the fateful time of trials." The first (love and care) is true in relation to the individual, the second (the instinct of self-preservation) - in relation to the masses.
    Nationalism is a natural state for the national elite in a fateful hour for its nation.

    Nationalism is not a preaching of national superiority. Nationalism is the will of the nation to assert itself. Nationalism is the innate desire of the people to preserve their own essence, their spiritual and soil identity, their national culture.
    Nationalism is a struggle for the independence of the people and the motherland against foreign oppressors.
    Russian nationalism is the sacred right of an indigenous nation to be a master in its own home, on the Land of Ancestors.
    Russian nationalism is the Russian order and the Russian economic system, capable of establishing social justice.
    Russian nationalism is the power of genuine Soviets (Soviets from the word "veche" - the will of the people).
    Nationalism is a sacred feeling of the blood-spiritual unity of a person with the people who gave birth to him.
    Nationalism is a tribal consciousness, an innate sense of the motherland. Nationalism grows from the native soil in the most literal sense of the word. After all, the Motherland is, first of all, Native Nature - the personification of the magical connection of the people with their land, where all natural sanctuaries - reserved groves, springs and oak groves are fanned by the breath of glorious feats, where the illuminated burial mounds are saturated with the power of the Prophetic Ancestors of the Sort.

    Humanity has many faces. True nationalism preserves the beauty and diversity of the world, generates the dynamics of its all-round development in a positive direction. Cosmopolitanism, "humanity in general" is a silly nonsense, a negative abstraction from the due realities of Being. If I'm wrong, show me a "tree in general" in the forest, not a specific birch or pine. Russian nationalists are opponents of globalization, which depersonalizes peoples. Nationalism is a natural awareness of one's genetic, historical and cultural belonging to one's people and one's homeland, a generic feeling, fastened by a common origin, language, history, culture, tradition and a stable habitat of a particular person and his ancestors. Everything else is from the evil one. Everything else is fake labels and false names. All mentally, morally and physically normal representatives of all estates should rally around the idea of ​​Russian nationalism, rally the whole people and thereby ensure the private interest of each within the framework of the national interest. Russian nationalism is the salvation of the nation and Russia!
  9. vid70
    +1
    15 July 2012 00: 23
    Any nationalism has the right to coexist, but only Russian is bad, wrong and generally no one needs (probably except Russians), and they have been convincing them for about 100 years that their nationalism will destroy the country. It's like a doctor who convinces that Vitamins are hypervitaminosis, but is silent that without them the patient will die at all.
  10. 0
    22 March 2020 21: 58
    “The country suffered two world wars, forced industrialization and collectivization, competition with the United States, and this undermined its foundations.” This should be added: our roads are bad because the northern climate is in the way. Complete shovel crap. Only in the scoop they make a scarecrow out of nationalism, and in other countries nationalism is a love of the people, their language, customs and culture. And this is understandable, the Russian Federation is a country at the expense of Russians, therefore Russian nationalism is so “scary” to a parasitic state.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"