Military Review

Another batch of upgraded MiG-31 transferred to the Ministry of Defense

89
PJSC "Nizhny Novgorod Aircraft Plant" Sokol "" fully fulfilled the state order 2015 of the year for the repair and modernization of MiG-31 interceptor fighters, reports ВПК.name with reference to the press service of the enterprise.


Another batch of upgraded MiG-31 transferred to the Ministry of Defense


"November 25 2015 in the flight test complex of PJSC" NAZ "Sokol" was the transfer of the final batch of modernized MiG-31 fighters of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation 2015 state defense order of the year, "said in a statement.

The aircraft carried out work on the "overhaul and modernization of systems and equipment," which significantly expanded their combat capabilities.

“After modernization, the aircraft has broader functions and capabilities for intercepting air targets and is able to withstand the most modern models of a potential enemy military equipment. The detection range of airborne targets has increased by almost 31 times compared to the serial versions of the MiG-2, the accuracy characteristics of SUV have improved. ", - quotes the press service of the general director of the plant Alexander Karezin.

He added that “the upgraded vehicle also received improved capabilities for hitting both unobtrusive targets and cruise missiles, as well as hypersonic aircraft”.

Upon completion of ground and flight tests, the aircraft departed from the factory airfield to the places of permanent deployment.

This is the second order for the enterprise, the first was successfully completed in 2010. “The work under the current contract is calculated until the end of 2018. Broadcast aviation equipment is carried out in batches in accordance with the approved schedule. Currently, the Sokol plant continues to modernize the next batch of MiG-31, which will also be completed on time, ”the press service concluded.
Photos used:
www.mirvremeni.ru
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dezinto
    Dezinto 28 November 2015 09: 36 New
    57
    Another mega touch of Soviet designers for the future, which (with this reserve, genius) we live!
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 28 November 2015 09: 44 New
      +5
      Another batch of upgraded MiG-31 transferred to the Ministry of Defense

      And how many planes are in this batch? Why are riddles reported? Or just 2-3 planes? - Then they would have written.
      1. vasiliysxx
        vasiliysxx 28 November 2015 09: 56 New
        34
        I live near the factory, engines start up every day, such power! So not two three, but thirty three.
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 28 November 2015 10: 00 New
          14
          Quote: vasiliysxx
          I live near the factory, engines start up every day, such power! So not two three, but thirty three.

          God grant! We would all be happy!
        2. Al_oriso
          Al_oriso 28 November 2015 10: 30 New
          +1
          Our defense industry is always on top, does not fail the country.
        3. Vorobey-1
          Vorobey-1 28 November 2015 11: 42 New
          10
          Quote: vasiliysxx
          I live near the factory, engines start up every day, such power! So not two three, but thirty three.

          Yes, the power is good, they (and not only) fly over my head every day (under the Lower), sometimes you look enough and hear enough and wonder what kind of monsters they are experiencing.
          About 15 years there was silence (from the 90s), and the last years I recall childhood - almost every day there is a buzz, you can immediately see the Falcon is working in full.
        4. Quager
          Quager 28 November 2015 19: 22 New
          0
          Good news!
      2. Laksamana besar
        Laksamana besar 28 November 2015 10: 10 New
        27
        Link received. MiG-31 link = 4 pcs. (two pairs). Three more Su-34 are preparing for sending to the troops.

      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. SAXA.SHURA
        SAXA.SHURA 28 November 2015 11: 48 New
        +1
        Watch TV.
      5. K-36
        K-36 28 November 2015 12: 04 New
        +7
        Information about the supply of the MiG-31 lies on the Internet. You just need a little: do not be lazy and rummage yes
        Here data:
        - This is the second MiG-31 modernization contract; the first was successfully completed by the enterprise in 2010. Work under the current contract is calculated until the end of 2018. The transfer of aircraft is carried out in batches in accordance with the approved schedule. Currently, the Sokol plant continues to modernize the next batch of MiG-31, which will also be completed on time.
        - In 2014, UAC supplied customers with 159 aircraft, 43% more than in 2013. The holding's revenue increased by 34%, to 295 billion rubles. The corporation has more than 98 employees. The president of the UAC is Yuri Borisovich Slusar.

        Took from here: http://www.vremyan.ru/news/sokol_peredal_ministerstvu_oborony_rf_ocherednuju_par
        tiju_istrebitelej-perehvatchikov_mig-31.html
        Best regards hi
        1. evge-malyshev
          evge-malyshev 28 November 2015 20: 43 New
          +3
          Quote: K-36
          Information about the supply of the MiG-31 lies on the Internet. You just need a little: do not be lazy and rummage


          In fact, top secret information published in the media as an "effective manager" by Slyusar Yuri Borisovich: how many aircraft were delivered, revenue, number of employees, etc. etc. And he is not the only one. It is regrettable all this ...
      6. 78bor1973
        78bor1973 28 November 2015 12: 41 New
        +3
        The first batch of about 60 aircraft and the second is still so much!
      7. The comment was deleted.
      8. evge-malyshev
        evge-malyshev 28 November 2015 20: 13 New
        +1
        Quote: SRC P-15

        And how many planes are in this batch? Why are riddles reported? Or just 2-3 planes? - Then they would have written.


        Need to think! Would you like to know how many pieces you made, where you sent it, etc.?
        This is a state secret. Even the shortcomings of their military equipment, in no case, should not be advertised in the open media.
      9. gjv
        gjv 28 November 2015 21: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: SRC P-15
        And how many planes are in this batch?

        Quote: vasiliysxx
        So not two three, but thirty-three.

        In total, in 2015 24 aircraft were modernized, i.e. 2 per month. For the next years, they plan 12 pieces a year. Apparently there will be orders for the construction of new aircraft of other types.
      10. Serge_SB
        Serge_SB 29 November 2015 10: 34 New
        0
        There is a complete info on upgrading MIG-31
        http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/MiG-31_01.html
    2. Tor5
      Tor5 28 November 2015 09: 51 New
      +4
      Good deal! Well done, aircraft manufacturers!
  2. Concealer
    Concealer 28 November 2015 09: 36 New
    -1
    The detection range of air targets has increased in comparison with the serial versions of the MiG-31 almost 2 times, the accuracy characteristics of the SUV have improved

    Is it now that two planes cover the entire territory of Russia ???
    1. almost demobil
      almost demobil 28 November 2015 09: 59 New
      +9
      Well, you, not only Russia, but also the United States, together with Australia, will capture fool
      1. Civil
        Civil 28 November 2015 19: 02 New
        0
        And what is the reason? What exactly was modernized?
        1. almost demobil
          almost demobil 28 November 2015 19: 17 New
          0
          Quote: Civil
          And what is the reason? What exactly was modernized?

          Upgraded to "B" now to "BM". In addition to the air refueling system, the BCVM was improved, the number of simultaneously tracked and fired targets was increased, avionics, radar stations were increased. This is the main thing, probably something else. Yes, in addition to the R-33 missiles, there are about 200 new missiles from the Launch Point.
  3. Teberii
    Teberii 28 November 2015 09: 37 New
    +2
    The right approach to the execution of defense orders.
    1. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 28 November 2015 09: 59 New
      +3
      In the 40s, when we caught the tail of Tupolev Design Bureau. for 2 years they issued Tu-2, the best front-line bomber. Before that they sat happily on laurels of glory and had a free bank account. This is also called effective management .. represented by Lavrenty Pavlovich Beria.
  4. Dezinto
    Dezinto 28 November 2015 09: 40 New
    27
    Is it possible to start pack-serial already? No? I think the effective managers dofiga. sad

    Yes! I grumble. "It used to be better". - Well, as for Soviet technology, this is just a fact! Created and implemented such! devices on which are fighting in the 21st century! - people worked non-sickly. To the conscience! With an idea and a look into the future ..... and not something to work out a grant!

    Something when I read such news about the next modernization of equipment that was developed in 1975, I become more and more a communist.
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 28 November 2015 09: 48 New
      +9
      So now it’s not conscience, but money is held in high esteem.
      1. Hagalaz
        Hagalaz 28 November 2015 10: 05 New
        +4
        Quote: 1976AG
        So now it’s not conscience, but money is held in high esteem.

        Quote: DEZINTO


        Something when I read such news about the next modernization of equipment that was developed in 1975, I become more and more a communist.

        Maybe try not to fight for communism, but for conscience?
        1. the villain
          the villain 28 November 2015 11: 02 New
          10
          Quote: Hagalaz
          Maybe try not to fight for communism, but for conscience?

          Everything is a little simpler: figuratively speaking, in the USSR, shoemakers did not steer the confectionery industry, and bakers did not manage shoe factories wassat . The sectors of the national economy were not led by "professional managers" and "fictitious managers", who, apart from profit growth, were not interested in anything, but people who had an idea of ​​what they were managing. hi
          1. Hagalaz
            Hagalaz 28 November 2015 11: 54 New
            -3
            Quote: Villain
            Quote: Hagalaz
            Maybe try not to fight for communism, but for conscience?

            Everything is a little simpler: figuratively speaking, in the USSR, shoemakers did not steer the confectionery industry, and bakers did not manage shoe factories wassat . The sectors of the national economy were not led by "professional managers" and "fictitious managers", who, apart from profit growth, were not interested in anything, but people who had an idea of ​​what they were managing. hi

            What are you saying? !!! And in my opinion, the whole country was driven by those who more beautifully bawled at party meetings! More or less high positions most often fell on just such. Do not believe me, try to patiently look through the Soviet-era Crocodile magazine, where this trend was ridiculed. And the concept of nomenclature is just from those times.
            1. the villain
              the villain 28 November 2015 14: 51 New
              10
              Quote: Hagalaz
              What are you saying? !!!

              The Minister of Defense in the USSR at least once was a furniture maker ??? Or the school curriculum in the USSR was not considered the best in the world ??? I’m not saying what would become of the character who would take medicine in the USSR, as it happens now, “optimize”, or transfer production to “effective owners” (damn, a hand reaches for a brick am ) And it’s interesting, what would the Crocodile magazine, from the Soviet era, say to our current situevina ???
              1. Hagalaz
                Hagalaz 28 November 2015 15: 07 New
                0
                Quote: Villain
                Quote: Hagalaz
                What are you saying? !!!

                The Minister of Defense in the USSR at least once was a furniture maker ??? Or the school curriculum in the USSR was not considered the best in the world ??? I’m not saying what would become of the character who would take medicine in the USSR, as it happens now, “optimize”, or transfer production to “effective owners” (damn, a hand reaches for a brick am ) And it’s interesting, what would the Crocodile magazine, from the Soviet era, say to our current situevina ???

                So the Crocodile magazine did not finalize, it turns out! Just do not throw a brick at me please laughing . Well, I don’t say that everything is fine today, but I don’t like when any statement is raised to the absolute. It is always helpful to remember where the roots go. hi
                1. the villain
                  the villain 28 November 2015 15: 40 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Hagalaz
                  Please do not throw me a brick only.

                  In you - for what ??? belay This is my reaction to the "fictitious managers and owners". winked I do not claim that the USSR was perfect and infallible, but you must admit, the shoals and excesses of that time, against the background of what the "professional managers" and other bureaucratic bureaucracy are doing now (which, by the way, is almost 3 times less in the USSR than in RF was) look like a child's fuss in the sandbox hi
                  PS / a Crocodile was a good magazine, toothy, charly to him, as to the moon in a lobster pose smile
                  1. Hagalaz
                    Hagalaz 28 November 2015 16: 20 New
                    0
                    Quote: Villain

                    PS / a Crocodile was a good magazine, toothy, charly to him, as to the moon in a lobster pose smile

                    Yah you! laughing What a perverse comparison! laughing We do not compare, for example, a normal family with any LGBT person. If you mentioned H. Bitstrup, you could still speculate. And so, pah - an abomination and dirty tricks! hi
                    Unfortunately, jambs and excesses, with proper cultivation, have grown into what we have ....
                    1. the villain
                      the villain 28 November 2015 17: 31 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Hagalaz
                      If you mentioned H. Bitstrup

                      And to Bidstrup them, as to Crocodile, in the same pose and at the same distance laughing
                      1. Hagalaz
                        Hagalaz 28 November 2015 17: 40 New
                        +1
                        laughing Here I am about the same! Worms, they are worms.
        2. 1976AG
          1976AG 28 November 2015 11: 19 New
          +6
          Communist ideology fought for the high consciousness of each person, i.e. for conscience. Without conscience, communism is impossible in principle.
          1. Hagalaz
            Hagalaz 28 November 2015 11: 44 New
            -1
            Quote: 1976AG
            Without conscience, communism is impossible in principle.

            Golden words!
            Quote: 1976AG
            Communist ideology fought for the high consciousness of each person, i.e. for conscience.

            And what are the results?

            I remember the struggle for world peace, I remember for the freedom of Luis Carvalan, I remember for sobriety. For conscience I do not remember. Only the sticker above the composter in the trolleybus is remembered. True, I want to correct myself as well, it’s impossible to fight for conscience, is it either there or not. You can certainly bring it up for a long time and methodically in yourself.
            1. 1976AG
              1976AG 28 November 2015 11: 53 New
              +5
              Conscience, consciousness ... Do not remember? Sorry ... And as for the result, it depends on who is doing it. The Bolsheviks, activists of the 20s and 30s were able to make an industrial giant out of a ruined, hungry country, and the pseudo-communists of the 80s drove this giant into a deep .op!
              1. Hagalaz
                Hagalaz 28 November 2015 12: 43 New
                0
                Quote: 1976AG
                Conscience, consciousness ... Do not remember? Sorry ... And as for the result, it depends on who is doing it. The Bolsheviks, activists of the 20s and 30s were able to make an industrial giant out of a ruined, hungry country, and the pseudo-communists of the 80s drove this giant into a deep .op!

                Controversial arguments. The pseudo-communists of the 80s are the direct heirs (literally and figuratively) of the Bolsheviks of the 20s and 30s and talking about them as aliens from another planet is at least strange. So, you know very well, at least from everyday experience, that if you really strive for something, then the result will certainly be. So how did it turn out that honest and conscientious people were replaced by a diametrical opposition?
                So I'm sorry!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Vladimir K
        Vladimir K 28 November 2015 13: 41 New
        +2
        All right. And one more thing: "A business that is not subordinate to national interests is parasitism in society." And we have the whole big business. What we can have from such a business is only the withdrawal of capital and no production. But it looks like things are changing for the better. In addition, Serdyukov was removed and the MIG-31 was back in service (who did not know, he wanted to cut the planes because of their alleged futility).
    2. Denis DV
      Denis DV 28 November 2015 09: 59 New
      0
      Duc, a trial batch of troops in the course of the year will be sung, finalized and put on stream hi
    3. veksha50
      veksha50 28 November 2015 10: 07 New
      +6
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Something i when I read such news about the next modernization of technology that was developed in 1975, I become more and more a communist.



      Amazing !!!

      I thought this was just happening to me ...

      PS So modern managers can achieve something ??? That the people will again ideologically turn to the communist faith ...
      1. the villain
        the villain 28 November 2015 10: 46 New
        +4
        Quote: veksha50
        I thought this was just happening to me ...

        With many of these things, you are far from an exception. hi
      2. Altona
        Altona 28 November 2015 10: 48 New
        +4
        Quote: veksha50
        PS So modern managers can achieve something ???

        ----------------------------
        Modern managers do not have a feeling of a creator, there is only a feeling of a janitor and a sawyer ...
    4. NEXUS
      NEXUS 28 November 2015 11: 22 New
      +6
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Is it possible to start pack-serial already? No?

      It comes to PAK FA and MIG-41 and Sarmatia with BZHRK Barguzin and Armata with PAK DA. There are a lot of projects and everything needs money, specialists and most of the time.
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Yes! I grumble. "It used to be better". - Well, as for Soviet technology, this is just a fact! Created and implemented such! devices on which are fighting in the 21st century! - people worked non-sickly. To the conscience! With an idea and a look into the future ..... and not something to work out a grant!

      That's right! And the word patriotism was not an empty phrase.
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Something when I read such news about the next modernization of equipment that was developed in 1975, I become more and more a communist.

      And many forget about the past or blame it, not realizing that without a memory of the past we will not have a future.
      Best regards hi
  5. aszzz888
    aszzz888 28 November 2015 09: 43 New
    +9
    Our ingenious designers put longevity into the car, and these machines are not lost in the present tense.
  6. chikenous59
    chikenous59 28 November 2015 09: 45 New
    +3
    Quote: DEZINTO
    Is it possible to start pack-serial already? No? I think the effective managers dofiga. sad

    Yes! I grumble. "It used to be better". - Well, as for Soviet technology, this is just a fact! Created and implemented such! devices on which are fighting in the 21st century! - people worked non-sickly. Not on .. in good conscience!

    PAK-FA is not for you to assemble a constructor. Since something is not ready, then there are objective reasons, there are problems.
    Or do you think that a military aircraft consists of 10 simple details ??? Think about it.
    Maybe you advise our military department what needs to be done so that the T-50 quickly appears in the troops.
    1. Dezinto
      Dezinto 28 November 2015 10: 00 New
      22
      Or do you think that a military aircraft consists of 10 simple parts?


      Of course you are right about the complexity, tests are required, ... but

      In total, from 1981 to 1989, 6 Shark-type boats were launched and put into operation.

      6! THE BIGGEST SUBMARINE IN THE WORLD! for 8 years! Built the USSR! Well, just like that for a second.

      It worked the whole country, factories, engineers, factories, vacuum welding, settlement department - ON PAPER! - counted! fragility, ductility, viscosity, speed ....- and! - 6 boats in 8 years! Okay, right? Imagine the amount of work and at what pace !?

      Once again, a simple question, why is Pak-fa still not in the series?

      Once again, I hint at the effectiveness of MANAGERS whose effectiveness is in the speed of dismissal for the sake of increasing profits !.

      Need techies! Successful is the factory where the director grew out of milling!
      1. Hagalaz
        Hagalaz 28 November 2015 10: 37 New
        +3
        Absolutely agree. Techies needed! After the 90s pit, young people didn’t come to our factory at all. Neither hard workers, nor engineers. And so all over the country! From designers to workers. Now come little by little, but it's such a "green"! Only after 10 years something will start to work out. And this green has to learn PAK FA. The old people stayed of course, but they are not lucky.
        1. Amurets
          Amurets 28 November 2015 13: 39 New
          +2
          Quote: Hagalaz
          Now come little by little, but it's such a "green"! Only after 10 years something will start to work out.

          Now there are such graduates of universities that it’s scary to let them in equipment. And what kind of education do they get by studying posters? Elementary troubleshooting algorithms are black magic for them.
          1. Hagalaz
            Hagalaz 28 November 2015 14: 53 New
            0
            Quote: Amurets
            Quote: Hagalaz
            Now come little by little, but it's such a "green"! Only after 10 years something will start to work out.

            Now there are such graduates of universities that it’s scary to let them in equipment. And what kind of education do they get by studying posters? Elementary troubleshooting algorithms are black magic for them.

            Techie? Also pent?
          2. boris-1230
            boris-1230 28 November 2015 21: 20 New
            0
            Now there are such graduates of universities that it’s scary to let them in equipment. And what kind of education do they get by studying posters? Elementary troubleshooting algorithms are black magic for them.

            And electricians with 4 and 5 categories, which can only change bulbs! They cannot read a simple diagram ... M.lya.t! negative
        2. lis-ik
          lis-ik 28 November 2015 16: 50 New
          +1
          Thank God the tendency for young people to prefer serious technical universities and all sorts of crap is slowly changing. In recent years, the competition for technical universities has grown somewhat compared to humanitarian and all kinds of underdeveloped academies and universities of the management type. I know by hearsay, my mother worked all her life in the education system, she maintains contacts now.
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. the villain
        the villain 28 November 2015 11: 06 New
        +7
        Quote: DEZINTO
        Successful is the factory where the director grew out of milling!

        Gold words!!! hi + + +
    2. 3axap82
      3axap82 28 November 2015 11: 15 New
      -1
      Steal f-22 ENGINE drawings.
  7. Peacemaker
    Peacemaker 28 November 2015 09: 45 New
    +1
    Instant handsome!
  8. Zomanus
    Zomanus 28 November 2015 09: 51 New
    0
    Interestingly, to what level did our modern aircraft reach the parameters?
    1. amber-50
      amber-50 28 November 2015 10: 10 New
      +4
      Ask differently. Who will now be able to reach him in their parameters?
    2. SCHNIFER
      SCHNIFER 28 November 2015 10: 25 New
      +1
      Modifications BM, BSM meet the latest requirements for the interceptor, often surpassing them.
    3. SCHNIFER
      SCHNIFER 28 November 2015 11: 09 New
      +3
      After the release of the first MiG-31 various modifications were made fighter:

      MiG-31 B - production aircraft equipped podzapravki system in the air, arms became 1990 year;

      Mig-31 BC - upgraded to MiG-31B, not including post podzapravki in the air;

      MiG-31BM - upgraded model year 1998, modern fighter aircraft, designed specifically for the Russian Air Force. Before 2020 planned improvement in terms of radar detection range goals before 320 km and simultaneous tracking of up to 10 aircraft;

      MiG-31D - experimental model can carry anti-satellite missile 79M6 "Contact";

      MiG-31I - fighter that can launch a small spacecraft;

      MiG-31M - modernization of aircraft 1993 with enhanced radar, avionics and armament;

      MiG-31F - universal tactical fighter-interceptor designed to destroy ground targets (radically new equipment);

      MiG-31 PV - export model MiG-31BM;

      MiG-31E - export aircraft with lighter avionics;

      MiG-31DZ - production aircraft, which is equipped with a system podzapravki in flight (different from the MiG-31B home to the refueling boom, and some differences in the structure of the cab);

      MiG-31BSM - a modernized fighter of 2014 based on the MiG-31BS without a refueling rod in the air
      Read more at: http://avia.pro/blog/mig-31-istrebitel-perehvatchik
  9. samara-58
    samara-58 28 November 2015 09: 51 New
    0
    Mig is Mig !!! Good luck: eagles and falcons! good
  10. Old26
    Old26 28 November 2015 09: 52 New
    +4
    Quote: Concealer
    Is it now that two planes cover the entire territory of Russia ???

    And what, the territory of Russia has narrowed down to 1,5 thousand kilometers ??
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 November 2015 09: 56 New
    +1
    Many epithets are used in the comments, so I’ll be silent aside. +++
  12. chikenous59
    chikenous59 28 November 2015 10: 01 New
    +2
    Quote: Concealer
    The detection range of air targets has increased in comparison with the serial versions of the MiG-31 almost 2 times, the accuracy characteristics of the SUV have improved

    Is it now that two planes cover the entire territory of Russia ???

    Like a child, by golly
  13. demos1111
    demos1111 28 November 2015 10: 06 New
    +1
    I’m thinking, but on Tu22ms you can install a long-range cruise missile or not. Something on footage from Syria, some bombs work. Previously, they were designed for X22 missiles, heavy missiles, carrying capacity should be enough.
    In Russia, without these aircraft, a high density of missiles missed by probable friends does not work out.
    There are specialists, clarify if you know.
    1. Dyusseldorf
      Dyusseldorf 28 November 2015 10: 25 New
      +7
      Why waste expensive rockets if you can hammer with cheap bombs? Disposal should be budgetary.
  14. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 28 November 2015 10: 10 New
    0
    It would be nice if on this MiG to catch up then the Turkish F-16 and from behind with a kick under the hollow to sandal!
    1. Dimka off
      Dimka off 28 November 2015 17: 30 New
      0
      with the R-37 rocket which Mig’s on board does not have to catch up with)))
  15. tinibar
    tinibar 28 November 2015 10: 13 New
    0
    How we need these planes!
  16. TTX
    TTX 28 November 2015 10: 36 New
    0
    Good, but little modernization needs to be built in a lot of quality and not only for sale in your army.
  17. KnightRider
    KnightRider 28 November 2015 10: 57 New
    0
    Recently, the Su-34 also handed over a partie soldier http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/70876/
  18. Imperial
    Imperial 28 November 2015 10: 57 New
    +1
    Well, it remains to equip their RVV-DB to Syria to help. Http://topwar.ru/82782-.html See how all sorts of needles and other falcons are doing.
  19. Valentine
    Valentine 28 November 2015 11: 03 New
    11
    How much time and opportunity to provide the army with the latest technology
    we lost during the "construction superintendent" Gorbachev, and the bitter drunkard Yeltsin
    They all squandered and drank, sawed and destroyed. And Tsar Boris also built a personal palace for 7 mln. And why should he have such honors? For the fact that
    I almost drank all of Russia for dropping it below Somalia and Zimbabwe? AND
    how many people at the opening of this panopticon were those who were from power, who plundered and seized the whole of Russia, and sang praises for him. I thought that Naina was a smart woman, and I knew perfectly well where her husband, an alcoholic Russia, had taken her, I somehow sympathized with her for her fate, although she was, as they say, the first Lady of Russia, and she, in fact, turned out to be
    just a bazaar woman building her well-being for our money. But this money could not go to hell knows where, but to the army, to our defense, to
    aviation, the Navy, etc. ... Sorry that it’s not entirely “in the subject,” but it’s pent,
    not to the defense industry, and they are building mausoleums for the scum who ruined Russia.
    1. Imperial
      Imperial 28 November 2015 11: 10 New
      +2
      It’s not worth it ... to remember the distance in the bust, believe me, the time will come.
    2. gangut
      gangut 28 November 2015 12: 39 New
      +1
      I also did not understand this crap and somehow Comrade. Putin has faded in his aspirations. But let's hope that Putin’s affairs over the past year nevertheless justify his actions. And Yeltsin with the whole family under the knife, and Gorbi needs an alpenstock in the head!
  20. From Samara
    From Samara 28 November 2015 11: 41 New
    0
    Great plane!
  21. Moonsund
    Moonsund 28 November 2015 11: 50 New
    +1
    Naturally, in BVB, the chances of a MiG-31 to win look illusive. Only DVB makes sense to discuss. According to information from various “Murzilka”, the detection range of a typical target of the “fighter” type (EPR 3m2) of the radar station is 120 km long. The same target AN / APG-68 (V5) is detected per 100 km. Considering that the MiG-31 ESR with a suspension is much larger than the F-16 ESR even with the PTB, it can be considered that, ceteris paribus, they will find each other in the PPS approximately at the same time. Thanks to the long-range missiles R-33, the MiG-31 has a definite advantage in the range of missiles, until the distance is reduced and the F-16 can not use AMRAAM. However, it is necessary to take into account that the R-33 is "imprisoned" for weakly maneuvering targets, therefore, a fighter with an energetic maneuver can disrupt enemy missile guidance. The low operational overload of the MiG-31 (5 g) does not allow its crew to evade the AMRAAMs. That is, in DVB the advantages of the MiG-31 with the R-33 are more than doubtful, especially considering the need to highlight the target for the R-33 GOS PAR, which limits the MiG’s maneuver.
    1. KCA
      KCA 28 November 2015 12: 42 New
      0
      most likely, they can answer such calculations only in Lipetsk, but not to everyone, and not about everything
    2. KG_patriot_last
      KG_patriot_last 28 November 2015 15: 45 New
      0
      In the next five years, the Russian Ministry of Defense is going to upgrade sixty fighters to the MiG-31BM level.
      Modernization allowed the MiG-31 to find a new life. At the Sokol enterprise they are dismantled "to the screw" and equipped with the latest equipment. These are such sophisticated aircraft that the process of restoring one machine can take a whole year. As a result, completely different fighter-interceptors, which can last at least fifteen years, already receive the Russian Air Force.
      According to experts, thanks to modernization, the aircraft has more opportunities for intercepting air targets. The detection range of airborne objects in comparison with the base version has almost doubled, improved characteristics of the weapons control system. MiG-31BM received new opportunities for defeat subtle targets, cruise and hypersonic missiles. One link of the fighters of these aircraft will now be able to cover the airspace of several thousand square kilometers.
  22. Anisim1977
    Anisim1977 28 November 2015 12: 02 New
    0
    It's time to send a link to Syria, let the guys sunbathe in the sun. And we will test in combat at the same time.
    1. SAN31
      SAN31 28 November 2015 16: 33 New
      0
      Where do they turn around there? Just soared, towards the sea, the EU is already on the prow.
    2. Dimka off
      Dimka off 28 November 2015 17: 33 New
      0
      Quote: Anisim1977
      It's time to send a link to Syria

      it would be nice considering the fact that a link of 4 Mig-31 aircraft controls airspace with a front length of 800-900 km. The border with the Turks would become even more impenetrable.
  23. NIKNN
    NIKNN 28 November 2015 12: 10 New
    +3
    And how many planes are in this batch? Why are riddles reported? Or just 2-3 planes? - Then they would have written.


    According to the leadership of the Armed Forces of the country, 60 Mig-31 are planned to be upgraded to BM version, 40 - to DZ and BS modifications, 150 pcs. write off weapons.
    Read more at: http://avia.pro/blog/mig-31-istrebitel-perehvatchik
  24. Eugene 48
    Eugene 48 28 November 2015 13: 01 New
    0
    The good news is very good. There will be something to oppose the enemies.
  25. Svetoch
    Svetoch 28 November 2015 13: 35 New
    0
    The most pleasant news where they say no deadlines and God forbid the postponement of deadlines, but they say the order is completed in full. soldier
  26. Butt
    Butt 28 November 2015 15: 42 New
    +2
    For Amur (2) RU
    You are right, this is partly true, but not so simple. Previously, the factory where they did this highest degree of technology of the future was professional family dynasties, mentoring of young people paid by factories ... and much more. A man of work and most importantly with the BEST PAYMENT of work was held in high esteem, and families received apartments within 5-8 years. And now, as in an oligarchic state - the pulling of skilled workers, the bait with promises of future high salaries, an extra payment of 10-12 thousand rubles for training during the year, and then little needed workers after the abolition of the extra payment. They say it is COMPETITION. As a result, the salary ratio of “successful managers” differs from workers and specialists by tens to hundreds of times! So it turns out not competition but a staff turnover.
    Just a question: Who benefits from this?
    Unless to these managers and people close to the feeder.
    When mastered the production of dryers worked in two shifts on the front. Serially mastered the release of the car in two years, and now everything is shifting to the right to the nth time.
  27. onix757
    onix757 28 November 2015 15: 50 New
    +1
    Thanks to the Soviet Union for the great legacy. Even after 25 years, the products of Soviet engineers and workers continue to stand on the protection of a peaceful sky.
  28. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 28 November 2015 16: 34 New
    0
    I don’t understand, t 50 will replace Mig31 in the future or it will not pull? The characteristics of the radar and weapons are quite consistent, the speed and range are slightly behind.
    1. xtur
      xtur 28 November 2015 22: 19 New
      0
      > I do not understand, t 50 will replace in the future Mig31 or he will not pull?

      The MiG-31 is about one and a half times heavier, so no matter how cool the T-50 is, it will never be able to catch the MiG-31. Almost all the achievements of the T-50, except for those associated with stealth, can always be used on the MiG-31 after the next modernization.
  29. MsRedMaster
    MsRedMaster 28 November 2015 17: 42 New
    0
    We would have a couple of these in Syria. Oleg Anatolyevich is very disappointed!
  30. Old26
    Old26 28 November 2015 21: 20 New
    +1
    Quote: Zaurbek
    I don’t understand, t 50 will replace Mig31 in the future or it will not pull? The characteristics of the radar and weapons are quite consistent, the speed and range are slightly behind.

    The T-50 is a multirole fighter. MIG - interceptor fighter. The MIG’s speed is higher; it is capable of carrying long-range missiles (they will not fit into the weapons compartment in the T-50). T-50 only medium and short-range missiles. MIG-31 is planned to replace MIG-41

    Quote: MsRedMaster
    We would have a couple of these in Syria. Oleg Anatolyevich is very disappointed!

    Lord, what a mania to drag everything to Syria. MIG-31 is designed for such open spaces as in Russia, it is not suitable for maneuverable aerial combat, they will bring it down. Why is it needed there?

    In addition, can writers ever remember that there is a minimal tactical connection, which should be? And then all the pair strive to drag in Syria. MIG-31 - a couple, "Iskander" - a couple, "Tulip" - also a couple ...

    I understand that it’s a shame for Oleg Anatolyevich. But the guys knew that "go to war"and not for a walk or rest (and here you can often hear, “a couple would be a MIG-31 (SU-35) and then on the list to Syria. Let the guys soak up the sun, deserve it”).
    And the answer must be so that on the one hand they remember, and on the other, so that this does not lead to a big war.
  31. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 28 November 2015 23: 25 New
    0
    Long-range missiles for the T-50 will, on which suspension, it does not matter. For the interception task, stealth is not needed. The fact that he is lighter, he is 40 years newer and he has no task to reach 3M. By radar and comm capabilities T-50 is a cut above. everything rests on the range of the co-pilot.
    1. xtur
      xtur 29 November 2015 22: 06 New
      0
      > By radar and comm capabilities of the T-50 is a cut above.

      All differences in the quality of the radar and advanced electronics can always be implemented on almost any aircraft, except of course smart skin. Such differences, updating the radar, can always be realized during the modernization of the aircraft. For example, after the next modernization of the MiG-31, the ability to detect targets increased by 2 times, according to the text of the news

      And the comm.possibilities of the MiG-31 were initially the best in my time, then even then they were necessary for the quality performance of their tasks. So these opportunities have tightened up now.

      > everything depends on the range and the co-pilot.

      the co-pilot cannot create a weight difference between aircraft of about 10t
  32. shadow
    shadow 29 November 2015 00: 24 New
    0
    And there is nothing to tell how, when, how much. Then the war will begin, then the enemy will find out, but for now let yourself be amused with hopes, as with a caliber that shoots 300 km)))))
  33. evgmiz
    evgmiz 29 November 2015 04: 34 New
    0
    But it looks like things are changing for the better.
    Yah?!. Is our business becoming nationally oriented? Looks like you were wrapped in illusions!
  34. Old26
    Old26 29 November 2015 12: 20 New
    0
    Quote: Zaurbek
    Long-range missiles for the T-50 will, on which suspension, it does not matter. For the interception task, stealth is not needed. The fact that he is lighter, he is 40 years newer and he has no task to reach 3M. By radar and comm capabilities T-50 is a cut above. everything rests on the range of the co-pilot.


    The meaning of the entire T-50 is precisely in its stealth, which is achieved precisely by the absence of external suspensions. And tell me why a multi-purpose fighter, which is imprisoned for air combat needs long-range missiles. For him, medium and short range missiles are needed.
    It is easier, no one argues here. Whether it will be better in terms of its radar in the T-50 is still unknown. And to compare the existing and serial MiG radar with the so far non-serial in the T-50 is quite problematic. The cost of the T-50 will be very, very decent, which means that the quantity will not be large. And to use it also as an interceptor is unprofitable. It is clear that give free rein, Poghosyan would replace the entire fleet of Russia with Sukhoi machines. But why use a multi-purpose machine instead of a specialized one is not clear. Moreover, it has already been announced that the MIG-31 will replace the MIG-41, which will surpass all Russian fighters in speed, which is necessary for the interceptor: speed and long-range missiles