Military Review

Mystical roots of the disease of Ukraine

58
Immediately, I’ll make a reservation that it’s not about the inhabitants of a geographical region called Ukraine, but about those former Russian people who suddenly began to feel that they were a separate and original people, for which the Russians became the main, possibly the only, and the most terrible enemy in the world.


Of course, this is the result of a long zombie of this part of the Russian population by our geopolitical rivals, begun in Vienna in the middle of the 19 of the 20th century and brought to a higher degree in our time. I will not condemn the foes: after all, everyone is fighting for the best place in the sun as they can. I would like to understand: where did the Achilles' heel come from the “Ukrainians”?

This is evidenced, in my opinion, the main vector of movement of the Ukrainian state, fortunately, is to enter the western civilization (into Gairopa !!!) and dissolve in it. Therefore, it is necessary to figure out: what does the “Ukrainians” attract so much to the West, and therefore, find out what is the difference between Russian and Western civilizations?

And here we will discover for ourselves that, despite the fact that both civilizations are formally called Christian, in reality they are religious antipodes.

The bottom line is that no matter how the religion is called, the main thing is, what god does it actually serve. In general, all religions can be divided into two camps. Some worship God the Creator, the Creator and Almighty of this world, goodness, light, truth and life.

The remaining religions serve his opponent - the degraded spirit of Evil, Darkness, Lies and Death. An organic feature of such cults is the obligatory bringing of bloody human (or at least animal) victims.

Christianity as a world religion was formed on the basis of the preaching of the Gospel by the twelve apostles, who brought their understanding of the teachings of Christ to various nations. Their works differed, apparently, quite seriously, since only four Gospels were later recognized as canonical.

As a result, to date, there are a number of Christian churches in the world and a multitude of sects that differ in their understanding of both individual details and the basic tenets of Christianity. However, based on the commandments of Christ, there is an opportunity to assess how truly an organization in its life activity corresponds to its name.

Since its creation, Western civilization has been called Christian - Catholic. But, if we consider it according to one of the commandments of the Gospel: “You will recognize them by their deeds,” and separate the deeds from the words, we will see that in essence it was not Christian from the very beginning. The litmus paper on the incompatibility with the name “Christian” was not only the fact of unceasing mass human killings both during the violent Christianization of nations and in the subsequent purposeful activity of the Catholic inquisition (crusades, inquisition, etc.), but, most importantly, the fact of sale organization head of the Catholic Church of indulgences - official documents for exemption for money from payment of sins.

From this, indisputably follows: with this concrete action the Catholic Church placed the Golden Calf above Jesus Christ, recognizing material wealth above spiritual perfection (purification). And it turns out that in the name of Jesus Christ the Vatican only covered his god, about whom in the Gospel of John Christ said: “Your father is the devil; and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning and did not stand in the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and the father of lies. ”

In practice, various versions of Protestantism, later recovered from Catholicism within the framework of Western civilization, generally turned to life according to the norms not of the New, but of the Old, that is, pre-Christian testament, the followers of which Christ addressed his words about the father of lies and murderers from the beginning. It is not surprising, therefore, that the whole история Western civilization is a story of war, plunder and homicide. Having captured almost the entire planet by the beginning of the twentieth century, Western civilization began to mankind on a global scale. She launched two world wars, killing 20 million and 50 million people respectively. Their goal is the accumulation of material wealth at the expense of plundered and destroyed nations.

However, the Russian people could find and accept the rational grain of the teachings of Christ. And most likely, he lived on these principles initially. That is why Christianity received its most complete development precisely in Russia. And prominent people who preserve objectivity, including representatives of Western civilization, testify to this in their statements. Thus, the German researcher B. Schubart in his work “Europe and the Soul of the East” writes quite directly: “... Russian possesses Christian virtues as permanent national properties. Russians were Christians before they were converted to Christianity. ”

Thus, comprehending history and making the necessary discount on human imperfection, one can rightly say that Russian civilization lives and develops in the vector of God the Creator, the vector of Light, Good, Truth and Life. This is confirmed by one distinctive feature of the Russian civilization - it never evolved from the work of slaves.

But, as we see, a part of the population of Ukraine fell before the temptations: these people were seduced by ACCURACY (live as rich as the West, and do not care how these riches are obtained), envy (why the “quilted jackets” live better), and they went for the betrayal . From these roots, and growing Ukrainian disaster.

In reality, the “Ukrainians” betrayed their Russian Kind, betrayed the memory of their fathers and grandfathers, abandoning the Russian name, and finally betrayed the God the Creator of Christ. This is undoubtedly evidenced by the organized transfer of Russian Orthodox parishes to the subordination of the Uniates. Which, in turn, obey the Vatican. With all the ensuing consequences.

The current situation in Ukraine is essentially described by Gogol in the story “Terrible Revenge”. There, the former "brother", whose soul was completely possessed by greed and envy, throws his brother into the abyss along with the baby. Having sold his soul to the devil, the envious seized unprecedented wealth. But sooner or later you have to answer for everything. This killer also answered, but not only himself, but his entire offspring. God punished according to his deed.

And now the “Ukrainian” is making great efforts to push the Russian Land (and even the current Galicia is originally Russia — Chervonnaya) into the abyss of the historical non-existence of the Russian brother, who has preserved the honor and dignity, virtually alone opposing World Evil.

If today's “Ukrainians”, besides a womb full of snacks, are also worried about the future of their children, then they need to make the right conclusion from the prophetic work of Nikolai Vasilievich.
Author:
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vend
    Vend 27 November 2015 09: 48
    40
    and about those former Russian people who suddenly began to feel like a separate distinctive people, for whom the Russians became the main, perhaps the only and most terrible enemy in the world.
    This affects not only Svidomo. Many former Soviet republics suffer from this. The same Baltic states. In my opinion, everything is simpler. Running away from the USSR, they thought that they would flourish, that they would also be cherished and cherished, as in the Union. But it turned out that nobody needs them, so, a small bargaining chip. But Russia rose and gained strength. And despite all the difficulties, we began to live better than in 90's. From this, the citizens of the former Soviet republics envy and anger. And to admit to yourself that you got scared and ran away is unbearable. It is much easier to hate and Russophobia.
    1. 79807420129
      79807420129 27 November 2015 10: 06
      13
      Yes, Galitsians, what kind of Russian people are they, Little Russians were once Russian, but who does not remember kinship has no future, they are not betraying them for the first time, greed and envy rightly say where the crest went, the Jews cried there. God owes in everyone's heart.
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 27 November 2015 10: 10
        +6
        Quote: Author Ivan Bondarev
        Some worship the Creator God, the Creator and Almighty of this World, Good, Light, Truth and Life.
        Other religions serve his opponent - the degraded spirit of Evil, Darkness, Falsehood and Death.
        That's the truth, BROTHER!
        There, the former “brother”, whose soul was completely dominated by greed and envy, throws his brother and the baby into the abyss. Having sold his soul to the devil, the envious person took possession of unprecedented wealth. But sooner or later you have to answer for everything. This killer also answered, not only himself, but all his offspring. God punished according to the deed.

        And now the “Ukrainian” is making great efforts to push the Russian Land (and even the current Galicia is originally Russia — Chervonnaya) into the abyss of the historical non-existence of the Russian brother, who has preserved the honor and dignity, virtually alone opposing World Evil.

        If today's “Ukrainians”, besides a womb full of snacks, are also worried about the future of their children, then they need to make the right conclusion from the prophetic work of Nikolai Vasilievich.

        The article is magnificent, correct. The author is a huge plus! And thanks!
        1. Mahmut
          Mahmut 27 November 2015 13: 26
          0
          Those who are Russian, they are Russian and have remained and are not torn to Europe. And in Galicia, an ethnic cocktail of Poles, Jews, Hungarians, Austrians, etc. is concentrated now. In the cynological term - at the plate.
        2. gladcu2
          gladcu2 27 November 2015 21: 03
          -2
          Baikonur

          The article is stupid. Volumetric and does not show the roots of the real roots of evil.

          The author is on the fingers and all the rest.

          Two opposites of good and evil.

          Good progress. Evil regression.

          Selfishness is evil. It leads to regression, the destruction of society. Section of society.

          I wanted to say communism, but I use a synonym. But I can’t find it. Leads to progress. Combines and directs common efforts towards progress. Society is developing.

          In order to destroy a society or a country, moral values ​​must be changed. Raise the role of the ego. The egoist always transfers his problems to the shoulders of others. What do we see in Ukraine.

          And in order to frighten the citizens of the Russian Federation well so that they do not feel relaxed, here is an example from YOUR LIFE.

          Everyone remembers the Rastishka ad? As there the little one at the end yells hysterically: "I myself! I myself!" A trifle, but the subconscious mind perceives.

          Daddy, no mommy chicken. Who would come and say: "uh, I hear, share with your brother."
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Phantom Revolution
      Phantom Revolution 27 November 2015 10: 11
      +2
      Quote: Wend
      It is much easier to hate and Russophobia.

      This is how the human brain works, it works for the positive, and if there is no positive, you need to invent it. "Russophobia and hatred" is, so to speak, a positive and justification for all their failures.
      1. Turkir
        Turkir 27 November 2015 10: 35
        +2
        need to come up with it. "Russophobia and hatred" is, so to speak, a positive and justification for all their failures.

        That is to say - negative.
        Russophobia and hatred cannot be called "positive" in any way.
        Negative, otherwise emptiness, vacuum, nothing - nothing is born out of nothing.
        The justification of failures is the self-justification of their own barrenness, worthlessness.
        Sterility cannot be "positive".
      2. Vend
        Vend 27 November 2015 10: 42
        +1
        Quote: Phantom Revolution
        Quote: Wend
        It is much easier to hate and Russophobia.

        This is how the human brain works, it works for the positive, and if there is no positive, you need to invent it. "Russophobia and hatred" is, so to speak, a positive and justification for all their failures.

        There is one, but it’s some kind of sick positive. Already a diagnosis.
      3. gladcu2
        gladcu2 27 November 2015 22: 07
        0
        Phantom Revolution

        Russophobia is a removal from society, a manifestation of selfishness. Hatred is a reaction to an irritant.

        I’ll add to the word.

        Why does Satan always ask for a soul instead of material values?

        Because by giving your soul you are selling yourself. You become aloof from people from society. You become an outcast. You kill yourself.

        Man progresses only in collaboration.
    4. Corporal Valera
      Corporal Valera 27 November 2015 10: 26
      +6
      Quote: Wend
      This affects not only Svidomo. Many former Soviet republics suffer from this. The same Baltic states. In my opinion, everything is simpler.

      No, it's not easier. Peering intently into History, you always go into metaphysics. "Many former republics", unlike the Ukrainians, were not originally Russian and came, for the most part, voluntarily. Voluntarily and left for a better life. With the Ukrainians, we just have the fact of betrayal, not even us, but ourselves in the first place! For 30 pieces of silver! The article is correct
      1. Vend
        Vend 27 November 2015 10: 44
        +2
        Quote: Corporal Valera
        Quote: Wend
        This affects not only Svidomo. Many former Soviet republics suffer from this. The same Baltic states. In my opinion, everything is simpler.

        No, it's not easier. Peering intently into History, you always go into metaphysics. "Many former republics", unlike the Ukrainians, were not originally Russian and came, for the most part, voluntarily. Voluntarily and left for a better life. With the Ukrainians, we just have the fact of betrayal, not even us, but ourselves in the first place! For 30 pieces of silver! The article is correct

        But do not tell. Before the 14 century, Lithuanians wrote and spoke Russian. There is enough evidence. Georgians themselves flowed to Russia with Vardank. Well and so on.
        1. Corporal Valera
          Corporal Valera 27 November 2015 11: 57
          +3
          Well, the Lithuanians, for centuries, have been ganging up and drifting driftly in the other direction. Georgians, both voluntarily came, and left. Everybody seeks power for disease. But Ukrainians in one generation changed their shoes
          1. Mr shrek
            Mr shrek 27 November 2015 12: 09
            0
            They were quickly retrained, well, the government and others like them, those contraceptives were sent, but the people instantly managed to fool and forced to dance to their tune.
            Donetsk and Lugansk refused, as did the Crimeans, and they destroy them, intractable.
          2. Vend
            Vend 27 November 2015 15: 08
            0
            Quote: Corporal Valera
            Well, the Lithuanians, for centuries, have been ganging up and drifting driftly in the other direction. Georgians, both voluntarily came, and left. Everybody seeks power for disease. But Ukrainians in one generation changed their shoes

            I almost agree. The Balts were rather Germanized. Svidomye for more than one generation changed their shoes. Even in the 80's, I was in the Western world, and so the Zapadents hated the Donetsk people even more than the Russians. Tested by myself. And if you dig deeper along the line of history, there are so many attempts by Svidomo to change shoes, and change clothes and repaint too. And the Poles served, and the Swedes, and Germans, but who only did not serve.
      2. brisk
        brisk 27 November 2015 12: 28
        +1
        Quote: Corporal Valera
        With Ukrainians, we precisely have the fact of betrayal, not even us, but ourselves in the first place!


        We all live in a society and a world of consumption. Scientists say that a consumer society is not the only possible society. There are alternative ways of development. Where is the attachment to the consumer way of life stronger in Russia --- in some Altai village or in Moscow? Yes, in general and in general, Ukrainians have a stronger passion and understanding of consumerism and hoarding than in Russians from the Russian hinterland. Ukrainians have all this consumer-greedy attitude. The Russians Russians have a slightly different direction — they have a lot of such abstract, something sort of, unusual ... Ukrainians basically never thought of such a thing --- they would grab something that is ownerless and be arranged of your hut, and poetry and other high art --- high tsur to them! In order for greedy Ukrainians, and not only Ukrainians, to realize all this now, they should always think at the level of deep philosophies and psychologies in their everyday lives ... And how many people think and live like that now?
      3. gladcu2
        gladcu2 27 November 2015 22: 19
        0
        Corporal Valera

        The article is superficial. It does not give an answer as they did with Ukraine. And does not disclose what to do, how to protect yourself.
    5. sergeybulkin
      sergeybulkin 27 November 2015 10: 33
      +1
      And despite all the difficulties, we began to live better than in 90's. From this, the citizens of the former Soviet republics envy and anger.

      Although we live better than in 90's, but still not good enough. There are many more problems, I'm not talking about them.
      There have always been many Catholics in Ukraine, and this is all the influence of Poland, where the majority of Catholics are. And they pour mud and try to at least somehow annoy Russia because they are terribly jealous, because they themselves can’t get out of shit, but only plunge deeper. Unfortunately, this process cannot be stopped. And the Balts and Dill will never be our friends, as indeed none of the Euro -ope. Maybe only for a short time for the sake of momentary benefits. By the way, still in the west they continue to hunt witches in some places (in the literal sense), are judged and imprisoned for witchcraft and corruption. fellow
      1. Vend
        Vend 27 November 2015 10: 46
        0
        Quote: sergeybulkin
        And despite all the difficulties, we began to live better than in 90's. From this, the citizens of the former Soviet republics envy and anger.

        Although we live better than in 90's, but still not good enough. There are many more problems, I'm not talking about them.

        There is such, but you must admit that we are trying. Everyone is trying as best he can, and people themselves have become better. There is unity, pride in the country and so on. I do not take into account traitors and liberalists.
      2. brisk
        brisk 27 November 2015 12: 58
        +1
        Quote: sergeybulkin
        Unfortunately, this process cannot be stopped. And the Balts and Dill will never be our friends, as indeed none of the Euro -ope. Maybe only for a short time for the sake of momentary benefits.


        Will be. It will take time, but not so much. Not one to one, of course, as it used to be in the USSR and during the Republic of Ingushetia, because everything is unique and inimitable, but it will certainly be. A beneficial turning point will occur in 2022 - 2024.
    6. Tor5
      Tor5 27 November 2015 11: 08
      +1
      I believe that this is not only a matter of religious affiliation, the roots are much deeper, of genetic hatred, when fathers and grandfathers bit the hand of an older brother, who is helping development with all his might. This hand was gone, the other did not arise. Who to hate? Of course, an older brother.
    7. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. venaya
      venaya 27 November 2015 09: 58
      -3
      Quote: PQ-18
      A FEW CENTURIES of the most severe serfdom ??
      Was it FREEDOM, EQUALITY, BROTHERHOOD?
      author with a head and historical facts DOES NOT FRIEND?

      What are several centuries ??? Who is not friends with the head?
      Study this issue more closely. At the direction of the Olenburgs (the then masters of Europe), the Rurik dynasties were replaced by the manual Romanov dynasty, and under Aleksey Mikhailovich they canceled "Yuryev's Day", which led to the initial inculcation of serfdom, that is, the initial form of slavery, which was instilled in Galia at the beginning of the first millennium (with the emergence of the" marquises ", which I have already written about here, and seizing the former public land into their ownership), then is Rome mastered Galia by introducing slave relations.
      1. PQ-18
        PQ-18 27 November 2015 10: 12
        +1
        When in Russia abolished the LEGAL LAW, ignoramus?
        (BEFORE YELTSIN or AFTER?) laughing
        1. varov14
          varov14 27 November 2015 11: 15
          +1
          Based on the comments, I draw a paradoxical conclusion - the rudiments of "serfdom" keep the Russian civilization in good shape; freedom, equality, and fraternity. A little bit of a slack hr.en where pulls, the nuts begin to tighten - love for the homeland and patriotism.
    2. Denis DV
      Denis DV 27 November 2015 10: 05
      +3
      Quote: PQ-18
      A FEW CENTURIES of the most severe serfdom ??

      Can you be more specific?
      1. PQ-18
        PQ-18 27 November 2015 10: 12
        0
        When in Russia abolished the LEGAL LAW, ignoramus?
        (BEFORE YELTSIN or AFTER?) laughing
      2. sovetskyturist
        sovetskyturist 27 November 2015 10: 52
        +1
        Can you be more specific?
        Photo - Nicholas II ROMANOV and George V WINDSOR, beginning of the 20th century.

        Behind any throne there is something more than the King Romanovs and co with all the consequences .... For those who do not know the Windsor, these are the Rothschilds.
        King of Great Britain George V and Russian Emperor Nicholas II were siblings. Some consider them cousins. No, they were siblings.

        On Vicky, the House of Romanov is unambiguously ranked among the Sephardic (EUREAN) royal house of the Venetian Habsburgs. From this the very concept of "crowned", that is, all "crowns" from Venice. The full name of the House of Romanov: Goldstein-Gottorp-Romanov. Under the official flag of the Romanovs it is written: "Parental home - House of Oldenburgs". They are vassals of the House of Habsburgs - look at the coat of arms of the main house of the Hapsburgs - Hapsburgs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habsburg he is exactly Black-Yellow. Here is the Habsburg flag elsewhere: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habsburg_Flag - House of the Romanovs - a branch of the House of Habsburg.http: //kpe.com.ua/9-glavnyj-razdel/2150-podnogotnaya-voz
        vrata-rossijs
        koj-imperii-v-sobstvennost-rotshildov.html
      3. Uncle VasyaSayapin
        Uncle VasyaSayapin 27 November 2015 14: 10
        +1
        The most brutal was in the 18th century, to be more precise in the so-called. "Catherine's golden age". 100 years before it and 100 years after it, the people lived more or less "freely". The maximum freedom was in the middle of the first decade of this century (between the end of the "dashing nineties" and the end of the formation of the vertical of power based on corruption with "bureaucratic" arbitrariness). But now, too, in general, freedom is not so little, although it is annoying that every paradise, region. etc. the center is the potential "Krasnogorsk" and "Kushchevka" in one bottle.
    3. smith7
      smith7 27 November 2015 10: 14
      +7
      The most cruel serfdom = slave labor? These are not identical concepts. Of course, the facts of mockery of the landowners of the serfs are known, but much more is unknown (after all, this is the norm, why write about this!) About the facts of the gentle attitude of the gentlemen to the peasants. The Orthodox faith was strong both among the noble landowners and among the people of the poor class. The main principle - do not wish on another what you do not accept yourself. And among the masters and peasants there have always been vile people, poor in spirit. But such an overt slavery, such as in the British colonies. There was also no "freedom, equality, brotherhood". There are not many cases in Russia when landowners treated peasants as things.
      1. venaya
        venaya 27 November 2015 10: 25
        +2
        Quote: smith7
        There are not many cases in Russia when the landowners treated the peasants as a thing.

        Such cases were very rare, for example, the serfs killed the father of the writer Dostoevsky, and only one of the serfs went to hard labor, so after the whole family was fed by the community, by prior arrangement. A rather interesting fact, which says that in Russia they failed to introduce the full-fledged serfdom, which existed in the west.
        1. Sergey S.
          Sergey S. 27 November 2015 16: 00
          +1
          Quote: venaya
          A rather interesting fact, which says that in Russia they failed to introduce the full-fledged serfdom, which existed in the west.

          Are you N.S. Have you read Leskov?

          And also browse the Internet - for example, on the request "the right of the first night":
          See the painting "The Right of the Lord" by artist Polenov Vasily Dmitrievich, painted on fresh tracks in 1874.

          or "violence (cruelty) of landowners over peasants" ...

          Serfdom was the shame of Russia.
          the more offensive that it was introduced in our country quite late, and "blossomed" in general after Peter I.
        2. gladcu2
          gladcu2 27 November 2015 23: 11
          0
          venaya

          The peasant families had a low level of egoism. The peasants have a common morality. Caring for your neighbor. Only the last children could be spoiled. Could have a selfish morality. This is not significant for regression.

          In modern society, the level of egoism is high. Small families, imposed from the outside morality of the consumer egoist. Leads to regression. Society is becoming unstable. With the aggravation of social problems, a small spark will create a destructive fire. Also, such a society is easily manageable. Egoists do not trust each other. The system of squealing.
      2. Azitral
        Azitral 27 November 2015 13: 19
        +1
        Civil society is immanent, inseparable by its nature from slavery. When it dawned on me, I was upset because civil society, everyone is equal, democracy is so beautiful. I started looking for exceptions, but I couldn't find it. A slave property, a serf, a peasant driven off the land who became a proletarian, children who were paid several times less, women who were paid several times less, a disenfranchised Mexican migrant who works for a pittance fifteen hours a day, Chinese, Bengali, Vietnamese, - slaves. Persons who are forced by ANY circumstances to work for income several times less than that of full-fledged ones. This is the only way to live well. Either the hierarchy and estates, with all the "charms", or the Civil Society and ... slaves. Which country is the richest? And where did the wildest slavery last the longest? Do not match? No? And in parallel, and then, - a stream of emigrants who agree to ALL. How not to get rich. And now the main sources of slaves have run out. The last big piece was China, but there labor has risen in price, and, consequently, China has been wasted. All!!! Civil society is sucking in the last drops of slaves, and will soon transfer 2/3 of its citizens to this category.
    4. avva2012
      avva2012 27 November 2015 10: 17
      +3
      A slave is a thing; he has no soul. The slave owner does not kill or cripple him, only because of material loss. A slave is not a man. Serf, still was ours, a Christian. For his murder, there was not only moral punishment. I don’t know where the relation to serfs is, as to slaves? Soviet propaganda, not otherwise.
      1. Riv
        Riv 27 November 2015 10: 34
        +5
        From the never-before-fully published Report to Emperor Alexander I on the situation with serfs:

        In the home shooting range of the Russian landowner Struysky, the gentlemen had fun by forcing the serf men to run in a limited space and firing bullets at them with rifles and pistols .... Of course, the public shooting gallery of Struysky was not spoken out loud in society. As well as about his terrible collection of instruments of torture, carefully copied from medieval samples. The poet-typographer had one more passion ... Sometimes he arranged a trial over one of his peasants in all form, and the sentence was always the same: "torture to death." The executioners, trained to handle the "collection", were immediately taken for the poor man and stopped only when the victim was out of breath ...

        Soviet propaganda, you say?
        1. Grbear
          Grbear 27 November 2015 11: 17
          +2
          Riv-y
          Said "A", say "B" What happened next, what was the resolution on the report, the fate of "the landowner Struisky"?
          A lot of terrible things happened and is happening in the Russian land, but more often than not, the "reward" finds "heroes". hi
          1. Riv
            Riv 27 November 2015 12: 06
            0
            And nothing followed. From the word "absolutely".
        2. avva2012
          avva2012 27 November 2015 13: 13
          +1
          Well, yes, propaganda.
          The fact is that I naturally do not justify the actions of the landowner or deny that there were no such cases. There were, but! For some reason, they only talk about them. The opposite, i.e., quite normal relations between gentlemen and slaves are not described. Everything is always bad in Russia. For some reason they forget the "charms" on the other hand. To prolong her youth, the countess took baths from the blood of young girls. Not slaves, English peasants, were "fenced off" under Henry, and then "for vagrancy", they were hanged by whole families. How did they work in the same England in the mines and who worked? They built the English fleet, also "free people", and they had social services. package?
          I have a negative attitude to Soviet propaganda, because under it, sprawling cranberries blossomed, that "everything was bad in old Russia." And if this propaganda of the 20's. the beginning of the 30s could still be understood, then after I.V. Stalin returned everything to its place, it surfaced again under Khrushchev. And Western propagandists do not need to invent anything, "your country was a country of slaves!" To the objection, "Well, you yourself say!" The scary thing is that these rotten theses have been hammered into our heads, and quite sane people do not even notice what they are talking about.
          1. Riv
            Riv 27 November 2015 19: 46
            0
            Well, what ... It is impressively said. "Normal relations between gentlemen and slaves". :))) No, if you are a master, then everything seems to be in order. And if he is just a slave, and if your dad is a target in the shooting range?
          2. Sergey S.
            Sergey S. 28 November 2015 09: 28
            0
            Quote: avva2012
            I have a negative attitude to Soviet propaganda, because under it, sprawling cranberries blossomed, that "everything was bad in old Russia." And if this propaganda of the 20's. the beginning of the 30s could still be understood, then after I.V. Stalin returned everything to its place, it surfaced again under Khrushchev.

            If, then, what you call Soviet propaganda has surfaced, then not under Khrushchev, but under EBN.
            Life made the brain move.
            And now, no propaganda will make you believe in the triumph of feudalism or capitalism.
            The trend comes to them in all respects.

            And taking into account the experience of Western geyrops, a trendy came to the peasants - there are so few agricultural workers (from 4% of the population) that they, as a social phenomenon, are almost invisible.
  3. venaya
    venaya 27 November 2015 09: 57
    +7
    DISTINCTIVE FEATURE OF THE RUSSIAN CIVILIZATION - IT HAS NEVER DEVELOPED IN THE WORK OF SLAVES

    This is precisely the whole reason for the collisions with Russian civilization.
    1. PQ-18
      PQ-18 27 November 2015 10: 13
      -3
      When in Russia, the Fortress of Fortress was abolished, an ignoramus?
      (BEFORE YELTSIN or AFTER?) laughing
      1. sovetskyturist
        sovetskyturist 27 November 2015 10: 58
        +3
        forms of enslavement are simply more sophisticated, slavery exists to this day, it is simply more veiled
      2. skullcap
        27 November 2015 18: 29
        0
        Quote: venaya
        DISTINCTIVE FEATURE OF THE RUSSIAN CIVILIZATION - IT HAS NEVER DEVELOPED IN THE WORK OF SLAVES

        Quote: PQ-18
        When in Russia, the Fortress of Fortress was abolished, an ignoramus?

        Equating serfdom in Russia to slavery, which existed in England (most clearly in its colonies) and other European countries, is the hyperbole of liberas Russophobes. Same as "Russia - the prison of nations."
        In fact, this is a form of organization of the state where everyone had their rights and obligations. And since this world is imperfect, since man himself is imperfect, this explains the excesses that occurred.
        Saltychikha was not the rule of that society, as stated by com. Propaganda, as an exception to it. For which she was convicted.
        In general, this question is very difficult, in a couple of comments (and our short articles) will not be considered. About this honestly said even such a notebook Democrat, as Nekrasov. Remember?
        "... peasants are good-natured
        I almost didn't cry,
        Thinking about myself:
        "The great chain broke
        Torn - spilled
        One end on the master,
        Another peasant! ..
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 27 November 2015 12: 24
      +5
      [i] The Russians were Christians before they converted to Christianity ”[/ i]
      Quote: venaya
      the whole reason for the raids on Russian civilization.
      Like this !
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. venaya
      venaya 27 November 2015 10: 18
      +1
      Quote: PQ-18
      When serfdom was abolished in Russia, ignoramus?

      A fun start! We start from the basics. Are we talking about cancellation or introduction? Paul I began to cancel, Nicholas I continued, Alexander II almost finished. Someone disagree? But serfdom was introduced in Russia a thousand years later than in the west. I see you are a newbie here, you are using the inadmissible formulation "ignorant", which is not accepted on this site, although this applies to you personally in the first place. If you do not understand something, then have a culture - ask questions culturally, otherwise I see you have a complete lack of knowledge in this matter.
  5. vit357
    vit357 27 November 2015 10: 12
    +2
    This is confirmed by one DISTINCTIVE FEATURE OF RUSSIAN CIVILIZATION - IT NEVER DEVELOPED ON THE WORK OF SLAVES.

    A very categorical and controversial statement. Yes, the words "serfdom" are different letters, but the meaning of slavery is the same, otherwise I agree with the author.
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 27 November 2015 10: 27
      +2
      I got the feeling that in the West, all the propaganda of the USSR, they took note of it. Well, of course, they also write about themselves, "Farewell to unwashed Russia ....", etc.
      They tried to think. Well, where in Europe, gentlemen, were the Servas friendly? Do not you really feel the difference in the relationship between the stranger-colonialist and the naked aborigine (Papal Bull remember that the Indians of South America have a soul) and between the Orthodox, let it be: Mr. serf.
      1. sovetskyturist
        sovetskyturist 27 November 2015 11: 20
        0
        The mess is not in closets, but in the heads - the cause of all ills
        1. avva2012
          avva2012 27 November 2015 13: 51
          0
          I'm sorry, I did not get it. The beginning is not bad, but about education, apparently, the thought did not finish to the end.
  6. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 27 November 2015 10: 14
    +5
    The time will come when the presence of Russian Citizenship will be highly prestigious! Possession of it - will be revered for great good and happiness!
    Is funny I don’t! It will be so!
  7. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 27 November 2015 10: 24
    +2
    Quote: Mihalich17
    The time will come when the presence of Russian Citizenship will be highly prestigious! Possession of it - will be revered for great good and happiness!
    Is funny I don’t! It will be so!

    Yesterday they killed you for being Russian! And if you are also Orthodox, things cannot be carried by "civilized" Europe at all.
    Particularly successful in all kinds of meannesses and basenesses, at the mention of the Russians, in general, as a demon, he cringe from incense. In individuals, generally hysteria begins.
    1. brisk
      brisk 27 November 2015 12: 35
      +1
      Quote: Denis-Skiff
      Yesterday they killed you for being Russian! And if you are also Orthodox, things cannot be carried by "civilized" Europe at all.
      Particularly successful in all kinds of meannesses and basenesses, at the mention of the Russians, in general, as a demon, he cringe from incense. In individuals, generally hysteria begins.


      In Colombia and other Lat. America will come to the store in white and will not be served for a long time. Because gringo, since white is from the USA. And tell me that from Russia --- immediately 180 degrees --- so that you would like, you did not go awry, do not want a coffee? So they love Russians there, but not Americans, they really don't like them. So this is not a chip of the Baltic States and Poland alone with respect to Russians and Russian speakers who came to skimp on their stores.
  8. Hell's Angel
    Hell's Angel 27 November 2015 10: 30
    0
    Just read in the comments on "inosmi". Undeuropendoucropia! I have not heard that before.
  9. Alibekulu
    Alibekulu 27 November 2015 10: 31
    -1
    DISTINCTIVE FEATURE OF THE RUSSIAN CIVILIZATION - IT HAS NEVER DEVELOPED IN THE WORK OF SLAVES
    That's right - Russia did not develop on the labor of slaves. She successfully stagnated because of him, which led to the defeat in the Crimean War ..
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 27 November 2015 13: 20
      +2
      It stagnated, not because "Russia did not develop on the labor of slaves," but because the industrial revolution was carried out, no longer in Russia, but only in the USSR. In England this revolution was carried out much earlier and in more savage ways. What collective farms! They did not even stand next to the number of victims.
  10. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 27 November 2015 10: 36
    +1
    Correct article. Thanks to the Author - everything is so. Today in the "Military Archive" there is an article about the terrible vandalism in Ukraine.
  11. vladimirw
    vladimirw 27 November 2015 10: 51
    0
    a little complicated and mysticism was added by the author, but correctly.
    And in fact, those who have lived since the establishment of Soviet power and the creation of Ukraine, as a Soviet republic, a state for free, have corrupted the people and in the last 20 years of "independence" have already lived at the expense of the peoples of the Russian Federation, gas prices, rent for Sevastopol, plus Russophobic propaganda, turned the inhabitants of the Outskirts of the Russian world into, envious and greedy.
    1. orphan 63
      orphan 63 27 November 2015 13: 05
      0
      The country of Mazepia is traitors to faith, the memory of ancestors, fraternity, and also traitors to common sense and conscience.



      1. orphan 63
        orphan 63 27 November 2015 13: 11
        0
        Ukraine, you are crazy - a song to verses by the same author



        1. orphan 63
          orphan 63 27 November 2015 13: 22
          +2
          lol Short but capacious!

  12. Tanysh
    Tanysh 27 November 2015 11: 01
    +4
    I don’t remember who said, but what was said sank into the soul "In the West there is a church without God, but in Russia there is a God without a church"
    My grandfather used to say "You can't hang God on the wall, God is inside you - live divinely"
  13. fa2998
    fa2998 27 November 2015 11: 06
    +1
    Quote: sovetskyturist
    King of Great Britain George V and Russian Emperor Nicholas II were siblings. Some consider them cousins. No, they were siblings.

    To write this on a rather serious site is stupid. fool hi
  14. brisk
    brisk 27 November 2015 11: 19
    0
    The author repeats what has been repeated by others. For some reason, they all rested on Orthodoxy, Catholicism, Uniateism ... Collossal the difference between them! This is all the same berry field and there is no difference between them. These are not native beliefs of both the inhabitants of the Vyatka land and the Chernigov, Suzdal, Volyn, Smolensk, Galician, Polotsk, Kiev, Tver, Novgorodian ... Orthodoxy, Catholicism, Uniatism ... They changed Berezovsky to Abramovich, the upper class! All this from the Semitic people. Well, what's not clear? The Slavs do not have their own relatives, the most initial beliefs? No Svarog? Don't have your Veles book, your holidays and beliefs? No Ivan Kupala and no god Kolyada? And about Vienna and Austria is also very far-fetched. The Swiss sergeant from Putim told his corporal, after a liter of kontushovka ---- "we, Austria, are jerks against Russia ... Nikolai Nikolaevich will soon become the Czech king ... long live Russia!" And what, in fact, prevented Russia from doing some similar trash of Austria with its cunning general staff in their rotten patchwork Habsburg monarchy? To raise them in their own house, evil, nasty and ungrateful, so to speak mutants, from Hungarians, Germans or Czechs with Poles? For 130 years it was quite possible to do this.
  15. 1rl141
    1rl141 27 November 2015 11: 59
    0
    The hostile attitude of Muslims towards Christians arose during the crusades of "enlightened" Europe. Before these bloodthirsty campaigns, Christians and Muslims lived peacefully and happily for themselves. Until enlightened Europe came and began to destroy Muslims.
    And in general, in my opinion, because of religion on this planet more people are destroyed than because of any cataclysms.
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 27 November 2015 13: 32
      0
      What was to be done? You, read the story. In Europe, then everything seemed to be divided, it is necessary to develop the economy, but here in crowds of passionaries wander. Moreover, they don't know how to wave a sword. What would become of Europe if you didn't send this whole gang somewhere? I am not making excuses for the Christians of that time, but even if they were all entirely atheists, or supporters of scientific materialism, it does not matter for the "authorities" of that time, it was necessary to decide this issue, and, forgive me, there are no other ways. The situation was similar during the Spanish conquest of South America. The Arab-Spanish wars are over and, again, there is an overabundance of those who can only cut well, and plunder. Poland was not lucky. There was nothing to do with their Arkharovites, so they lived to see partitions.
  16. Arandir
    Arandir 27 November 2015 12: 19
    0
    it’s not clear who could put even these seven minuses. briefly, capaciously, talentedly.
    1. Azitral
      Azitral 27 November 2015 13: 27
      0
      It hurts too pretentious. All these "Words With Cap" inevitably raise suspicions of sincerity. But a plus.
  17. Whowhy
    Whowhy 27 November 2015 13: 53
    0
    The article, of course, contains many controversial (in terms of facts) statements, but the main essence of this article is directed против Orthodoxy and against "God the Creator, Creator and Almighty of this World, Good, Light, Truth and Life." The article is simply saturated with anger and pagan worldview.

    To begin with, the Creator God the Creator is the only one (there is no other reality outside God), He is absolute and perfect in all its manifestations. God is Great, Infinite and not fully cognizable.
    Thus, any statements that any religion is more perfect and more correct than others are directed against the One God (the Creator and Almighty of this World), since he claims that someone (and for some reason everyone is automatically attributed to this someone other followers of the religion) much better than others knew God, which is simply impossible on the basis of basic concepts about the One God-Creator. God is one and all people (moreover, regardless of belonging to any confession) pray to him in different ways ("everyone has their own God"). By the way, this is in good agreement with the hypostasis of God as the Creator. Any other statements are the essence of paganism and obscurantism, based on pagan ideas that there are many gods and that your own god is better than someone else's.
    Of course, any religion, in addition to the sacred meaning, contains a lot of superficial, secular. It is these "sediments" that are the source of "religious" discord and "religious" strife. Thus, anyone who, instead of searching for a single one for all religions, Love and Harmony, is engaged in inciting religious hatred, deftly playing with human feelings, serves "the degrading spirit of evil, darkness and death."
  18. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 27 November 2015 14: 01
    +2
    Of course, this is the result of prolonged zombies of this part of the Russian population by our geopolitical rivals.


    And where did our people look all this time? To the stars? I said and will repeat now - we need not build rockets and tanks for Ukraine, but TV towers. And drive them through their brains from morning to evening, and at night too. And in ten years they will sing, "God Save the Tsar," screeching with zeal and patriotism in impeccable Russian.
  19. avva2012
    avva2012 27 November 2015 14: 13
    0
    Quote: whowhy
    Of course, any religion, in addition to the sacred meaning, contains a lot of superficial, secular. It is these "sediments" that are the source of "religious" discord and "religious" strife.

    Religions are still different. Read Bhagavad Gita. At what carefully. There is one episode, I personally, especially "liked" it. The story in the book, basically, does not come from the person of Krishna, but it is, as it were, a dialogue between a person who accepted the teaching and Krishna himself (I do not know whether to consider him a god - creator or not). So, a decisive battle is coming between supporters and opponents of the new teaching. And the main character, with whom Krishna communicates, is saddened. After all, his relatives are on the other side and they will be killed. On that Krishna, he calms: "who does not believe in me, he daemon, and if my follower kills him, then he will be reborn as a man "(I am not exactly quoting, of course, but the meaning is correct). Can you compare with the Sermon on the Mount, or not?
    1. Whowhy
      Whowhy 27 November 2015 17: 56
      0
      And you, by chance, were not personally present at this meeting ??? wink
      Answer yourself to the question: "By whom, for whom, and in what socio-historical setting are religious texts written?"
    2. The comment was deleted.
  20. afrikanez
    afrikanez 27 November 2015 19: 11
    0
    Greed and Envy live and prosper in our society today. Sometimes it even seems that these vices do not decrease but only increase!