The crisis of Islam as a reflection of the crisis of world religions

60
I'd like to understand why religious slogans have become a convenient screen for people who sow chaos and death? Of course, Islam is the youngest of the world religions. Of course, it is precisely the Muslim states that are now going through a very painful process of urbanization of the social order, when money for the rent of natural resources turns from a good into a real test. The village does not become so simple a city, a serious mental transformation is required, and financial pumping in this case, rather, it slows it down. But as it turns out, a crisis of faith is superimposed on this.

I will clarify. In industry, we should distinguish between the concepts of serial and experimental assembly of products. The quality of the serial thing is lower than the experimental one; this is explained by the requirement of maximum cost reduction in mass production and the technological level of production lines. In churches, mosques, synagogues, Buddhist temples, something similar happens when feeding the flock. The Gospel, the Koran and the Torah were written by people with very rare reflections, which, unfortunately, 95% of madrasah graduates, theological seminaries and even philosophical faculties do not have. No matter how good and wonderful people they are, they are not capable of being agents of faith and can only give people hope.

And hope, in principle, cannot replace faith, because instead of knowledge, there are many assumptions in it, and hence psychoses on this basis. While the standard of living is low, consolation is required, and all this somehow works, sometimes causing significant damage. But everything changed at that moment when people had the means and leverage to somehow influence the quality of their existence, at least the same medicine and education. And comfort, naturally, began to conquer hope. As a result, the Christian religion began to degenerate into a religious philosophy, and the Dalai Lama did in general get into the top 10 of the great atheists of modern times (according to Expert magazine). No, what? Therefore, there is nothing surprising in the fact that representatives of the younger religion, all the more burdened by the simplicity of the Bedouin world perception, most passionately defend, as it seems to them, the foundations of faith. This is also called hysteria.

However, a return to the Middle Ages is not an option. And let the atheists do not rub their hands together, for they certainly don’t shine.

Why? Man is the fruit of creation of at least a billion years of evolution. So, it carries processes in itself, and most importantly, their predetermination long before their appearance. So, again, in the world of people there are no random things. Animals reproduce themselves, but man in the outside world is called upon to comprehend and reproduce those processes, predestination, their sound, which are inherent in it by nature. With the kingdom of heaven on Earth so far it turns out badly, but we will continue to work, because this is our mission. I repeat, there are no random things, the same love and hate, good and evil carry a strictly rational nature, playing the role of markers of built-up puzzles that allow a person to make a mosaic of this world.

In humans, very often the basic settings conflict with current social adaptation. It leads you astray. And that is why the value of faith cannot be diminished, as well as the value of those people who bring it to our world. This is a very rare gift, a rare form of reflection, the ability to feel, listen to harmony, to the flow of dao, the holy spirit, etc. Different peoples of this phenomenon has different names. Buddhists have a unique ritual of searching for the successor of the late Dalai Lama, they consider this to be the reincarnation of Gautama. Perhaps this is the case, perhaps it works, as well as the fact that if we shake up the population of the entire globe on the indicated signs both among adults and children, we can find hundreds, if not thousands, worthy candidates for the role of potential spiritual leaders. For seven billion it is very little.

And here, dear citizens, friends and comrades, I want to say a very important thing. Now Russia has entered the struggle for its interests with very strong opponents. The resources of the parties are incommensurable, there are few chances to win in the struggle by traditional means, namely by the same propaganda, diplomacy, economic and military means. Therefore, I propose to do something that no one has ever done before. It is necessary to find and bring together people who possess this unique reflection, neglecting religious and social prejudices, give them time and the opportunity to deal with their unique gift. This will not make here and now more guns and oil, but it will certainly help to win the battle for the minds and hearts of people, which will give everything else.

The knocking will open.

Completion of the cycle "Country of geniuses": Country of geniuses. Part of 2.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. -3
    27 November 2015 06: 02
    Man is the fruit of creation of at least a billion years of evolution.

    It always amazes me, by what right are some religions called "world"?
    Moreover, these religions are usually of African origin. Is it really only the homeland of "true" zombies (where they first appeared) should have the right to be called "world" religions.
    1. 0
      27 November 2015 06: 06
      Quote: venaya
      Man is the fruit of creation of at least a billion years of evolution.

      It always amazes me, by what right are some religions called "world"? Moreover, these religions are usually of African origin.

      religion, killed more of the world's population than all illnesses, crimes, and disasters. To ban them all ...
      1. 0
        27 November 2015 06: 10
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        religion, killed more of the world's population than all illnesses, crimes, and disasters. To ban them all ...

        Buckle's 1837 book of Vyrusk describes 50 religious concessions. How many are left now? Are all religions as bloodthirsty as these "world" of African origin? Something I'm not sure about.
        1. 0
          27 November 2015 06: 34
          Unfortunately, I have to repeat my comment on the previous article “The Country of Nuclear Radicals”

          It is important to understand why what is happening with religion in Pakistan and generally around the world.
          Firstly, the fermentation of Muslims, as well as the fermentation of Christians, are the self-confident claims of blindly believing people to their “God's chosen people” in their right to rule over other people and impose their will on them. For this they will fight to the end. Moreover, Islam is more aggressive than Christianity in that it is psychologically implicated also on the sexual aspect. Namely, the Muslim men for the exploits in the name of God, Islam promises virgins in paradise 100. The sexual aspect in this case acts as the strongest biological stimulus for excitation of pleasure centers on a subconscious level - i.e. acts like a physiological drug.
          Secondly. ANY religious denomination (church) is a rapidly richer business structure - a religious business corporation - which trades by providing believers with donations (i.e., in fact, trades by selling for money, for material rewards and for various commercial state references to clergy from those in power) various religious services - moreover, not taxed at all for centuries.
          Naturally, financially - even in the sense of taxes alone - SECONDARY business corporations that pay taxes are RICHER SLOW than RELIGIOUS corporations. In this case, any RELIGIOUS denomination is, in fact, also an offshore zone, i.e. state in state. Therefore, SECURITY corporations - over time - historically always lose RELIGIOUS if the SECOND corporations were not protected against RELIGIOUS by a special law, for example, the Constitution of the country.
          Moreover, between these religious business denominations (churches) there has always been and still is inter-religious competition in the market of religious services, which has always led and leads to inter-religious wars in the history of mankind.
          All this is well known from the priestly times of ancient Egypt and was used by those in power in their principle of “Divide - and rule!”
          And all this is well understood by US analysts who have drawn up their Harvard project to establish a "new world order", which purposefully use this knowledge-truth in practice.
          The US Harvard project, as a continuation of the Houston project to establish a “new world order”, implies the fragmentation of all modern secular states into small monarchical religious states with the complete dependence of quasi-monarchs on the USA itself as a result of the organization of inter-religious wars that we are now able to observe . Moreover, the project, as a consequence, implies that science in these new colonially dependent religious state formations will be destroyed at the root and reduced to a medieval and earlier religious obscurantism - scientifically untenable - level; that industry will be liquidated and production in the country will fall to a makeshift level, etc., etc. And part of the Earth’s population in these countries is the so-called. "Extra" people of mankind - will be "disposed of" in this case.
          Thus, inter-religious wars and slavery are envisaged in the Harvard project as the future of mankind as a result of the establishment of a “new world order”.
          Therefore, if you want peace, then states should only be secular - supra-religious, and religion - a private affair of citizens.
          1. +2
            27 November 2015 06: 53
            ... Harvard project, Houston project ...
            The US Harvard project, as a continuation of the Houston project to establish a “new world order”, implies the fragmentation of all modern secular states into small monarchical religious states with the complete dependence of quasi-monarchs on the USA itself as a result of the organization of inter-religious wars that we are now able to observe . Moreover, the project, as a consequence, implies that science in these new colonially dependent religious state formations will be destroyed at the root and reduced to a medieval and earlier religious obscurantism - scientifically untenable - level; that industry will be liquidated and production in the country will fall to a makeshift level, etc., etc. And part of the Earth’s population in these countries is the so-called. "Extra" people of mankind - will be "disposed of" in this case.
            No one tried to push the squeezed toothpaste back into the tube? ... Try it! and - if all of a sudden! - it will work out. chat with Harvard-Houston spotlights! ...
        2. -1
          27 November 2015 07: 05
          Quote: venaya
          Buckle's 1837 book of Vyrusk describes 50 religious concessions. How many are left now? Are all religions as bloodthirsty as these "world" of African origin? Something I'm not sure about.

          it's not even worth talking about "everything", there are enough "title" ones, I will not continue further, those who wish will find it themselves! and for my atheism, I can fly to the "ban" ... punished "for faith" repeatedly ...
      2. +3
        27 November 2015 06: 18
        Andrey Yuryevich
        religion, killed more of the world's population than all illnesses, crimes, and disasters. To ban them all ...

        I agree. Good offer.
        But there is no crisis of Islam. The author is mistaken. Islamists do what they did the entire period of their existence, if there was a chance.
      3. +9
        27 November 2015 06: 21
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        .to ban them all ...

        Then I agree! But this is a question that will cause a flurry of discontent among believers.
        atheists do not rub pretty little hands - I have a question, is it such sarcasm? I don’t rub hands, I will not accept killing people in the name of God! Anyone!
        1. -2
          27 November 2015 09: 51
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          I don’t rub hands, I will not accept killing people in the name of God! Anyone!

          In the name of God (anyone), only the mentally retarded go to kill. A normal person goes to kill for loot. The Crusades were for loot. An Arab caliphate has spread around the world from the Arabian Peninsula, also in the name of dough, not Allah. The backstage of the world (all Jews) with the hands of Aloizych arranged the notorious localhost the Holocaust to its fellow tribesmen now has a healthy profit, swinging its tragedies from left to right. Absolutely all the wars on Earth have been and are being waged for loot. And those who went to kill and die in the name of God - to put it mildly, poorly understood what they were doing. True, the majority of the Earth’s population is such, but, in general, this is not their fault either - they, without knowing it, lost the war. And those who won cut their loot.
          1. 0
            27 November 2015 10: 53
            But the modern historical parallels of high-ranking adherents of religion.

            Yatsenyuk - Scientologist, Turchinov is the leader of the "Boston Church of Christ".
            Since the 1993 of the year, Scientology in the United States has received the status of religion, complete exemption from taxes and the protection of the Department of State.
            http://maxpark.com/community/5069/content/2682656

            Scientology inherent in fascism and so onbecause Scientologists say that a person needs to rehabilitate his power before his perceptions turn on.
            http://www.gollandia.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=149:-10&cat

            id=35:2010-08-30-16-52-38&Itemid=60

            Scientologist Yatsenyuk - Pentagon henchman! He helps the foreign neo-colonialists plunder Ukraine, personally was involved in the torture of Russian prisoners of war during the war in Chechnya on the side of the Dudaev neo-nationalists, and also helps to "utilize" the population of Ukraine in a fascist way with the help of the ATO against the LPR and the DPR.
            Yatsenyuk’s sister lives in Santa Barbara California and leads the Scientology Church there. Yatsenyuk is also not the last figure in the Church of Scientology.
            There was also information that Yaytsenyuk "earned" his first billion evergreen tugriks during the year of his premiership. It was even voiced by the Ukrainian media.
            It must be assumed that the money "earned" by Yatsenyuk in Ukraine by Scientology has by and large passed and pass by him taxes to the budget of Ukraine.
      4. +2
        27 November 2015 09: 40
        Christian commandments forbid killing. Murders in the name of democracy are now popular. For self-justification, justification of their greed, you can pervert everything and then forbid everything. Religion and democracy will be to blame.
        1. -4
          27 November 2015 11: 03
          Quote: anykin
          Christian commandments forbid killing. Murders in the name of democracy are now popular.

          The commandments forbid, but the practice is full of opposite examples: Vladimir Kogan destroyed 3/4 of the population of his controlled calories (principality), which drove the Kiev principality into poverty, the complete extinction and replacement of the population, which we now observe in those places. And in the West there was utter horror, only tens of thousands of people were annihilated in one "St. Bartholomew Night"! In Russia, this has never happened.
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. 0
        27 November 2015 12: 45
        And how many religions have "killed" the population, and how many diseases, crimes, disasters? Do you have specific statistics? So give it.
    2. +6
      27 November 2015 06: 44
      Quote: venaya
      Moreover, these religions usually have African origin.

      Zoroastrianism in Persia;
      Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the Middle East (Syria, Palestine, Arabian Peninsula);
      Buddhism in India.
      Is Africa something huge, or is it a "two" in terms of geography?
      1. -6
        27 November 2015 07: 09
        Quote: V.ic
        Zoroastrianism in Persia;
        Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the Middle East (Syria, Palestine, Arabian Peninsula);
        Buddhism in India.

        Specify the applied meaning of the term "world religions" !!!
        Buddhism was expelled from India a long time ago, although it originated there, read more closely. Judaism, Christianity, Islam ("Islam" the term comes from the word "Jesus" - it's just a Christian sect that originated in Arabia). Zaroostrism, although it has a Vedic origin like Buddhism, has never belonged to the "world religions". What kind of disease is this, to put assessments in the area of ​​knowledge where you swim thoroughly. Think a little at first, consult, and then draw conclusions. If you do not understand something, then it will not be difficult for me to explain it to you.
        1. +3
          27 November 2015 08: 25
          Quote: venaya
          Specify the applied meaning of the term "world religions" !!!

          Do you need it? It will be for you! Features: a) a large area of ​​distribution among the population of Homo sapiens (or those who consider themselves as such); b) historicity (at least one thousand years); c) maximum influence on the course of the historical process during formation and development; d) maximum replication of "sources", documented the basic tenets of faith;
          Quote: venaya
          ЗаndоStrism, although it has Vedic origin like Buddhism, has never belonged to the "world religions"

          Clarify your spelling of the word religion founded by Zardusht, this is for starters. Then remember what world power of that time was captured by Alexander Filippovich.
          Here are your words "Buddhism from India... ", ..." sect, originated in Arabia".
          How does this compare with your previous words "these religions usually have African descent"Are your India and Arabia still in Africa?"
          PS I didn’t give you a minus, but still explain your point of view of the allegedly “African” origin of world religions, how India and Arabia have gotten in Africa. laughing
          1. -1
            27 November 2015 10: 56
            Quote: V.ic

            I understand that I was asked a question, I answer:
            At the moment, four "world religions" are recognized, Buddhism (based on the Vedas) and three called Abrahamic ("Abraham gave birth ... etc."), that is, one of northern origin and three more, based on the Torah. In the early chapters of the Talmud, it is clearly stated that the main task of the faithful Jews is the protection and all-round protection of the Levites, which clearly indicates the origin and writing of the Torah and Talmud by them. Now let's look at the origin of the Levites, at least on the example of Karl Marx. According to genetics, the Levites have a purely African origin, in contrast to the natives of the Arabian Peninsula (Arabs and original Jews), who are of openly mixed origin, due to the migration of the northern peoples of Eurasia and African peoples. Even the example with K. Marx (no offspring in the third generation) clearly indicates the purest African genetics, the color of the skin itself does not matter, since it depends more on the amount of constantly received solar radiation over several generations. For example, Ethiopians have black skin due to the genetics and appearance of northern people. Now let's look: out of the four "world" religions, we have one northern (Vedic) and three African origin (not from the Arabian Peninsula, but created by ethnic Africans - the Levites), that is, the majority! Still, if Buddhism originated in India, today it is practically not there, Tibet has long been considered the center, perhaps you do not know about this, enlighten yourself.
            1. 0
              27 November 2015 13: 32
              Quote: venaya
              I understand that I was asked a question, I answer:

              You yourself insisted:
              Quote: venaya
              it will not be difficult for me to explain this to you.

              Quote: venaya
              In the present ... created by ethnic Africans - Levites), that is, the majority!

              Verbosity is not evidence of truth, they worked in vain. I am aware of the theory of the origin of mankind from Africa.
              In the presence of a well-established localization of the origin of these religions, there would be no need to drag in Africa. Before the exodus from Egypt, the Jews worshiped the golden calf (that is, they were pagans) / however, even now the worship of the “golden calf” is a distinctive feature of a famous people /. Moses led the “chosen people” through the deserts of the Middle East, and it was there that Yahweh revealed to him the foundations of morality for the future religion.
              Quote: venaya
              Buddhism originated in India

              And where, then, "African origin", as you previously stated?
              ...Buddhism...
              Quote: venaya
              Tibet has long been considered the center,

              ... with "African descent"! laughing
              Quote: venaya
              maybe you do not know about this, enlightenяhover.

              Not worthy, truly not worthy to be enlightened! / "Hallowed be Thy name; Thy kingdom come; Thy will be done, as in Heaven and on earth; give us this day our daily bread ..."
              1. -1
                27 November 2015 14: 39
                Quote: V.ic
                I am aware of the theory of the origin of mankind from Africa.

                That's where we had to start! But what about "Man is the fruit of creation of at least a billion years of evolution"- you are not familiar with this scientific statement at all, well, okay, it looks like you are a deeply religious person. Let's in order:
                1. Buddhism is one of the religions of Vedic origin, recognized by someone also world-wide, which is an exception.
                2. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are basically Abrahamic, based on the Torah, a description of the past African tribe (I will name the tribe later).
                And what happens: out of 4 "world" ones, only one of northern origin, hence my term "mainly". And what is still not clear to you here? How long can you explain the same thing? Have a conscience! Or it is still not clear that the Vedic religions are not African. Or are you just kidding? "Before the exodus from Egypt, Jews worshiped the golden calf (i.e., were pagans)"- Have you witnessed this? Where is the scientific confirmation of this statement? Am I on the website of a psychiatric clinic? The term" Jews "itself appears only in 1820! The Talmud was written only in the XNUMXth century, this is a scientific fact, not religious nonsense Are we on a religious site to spread disinformation not confirmed by non-religious science here.
                1. 0
                  27 November 2015 15: 15
                  Quote: venaya
                  It was from this point that one had to start!

                  Quote: venaya
                  Am I on the psychiatric clinic website?

                  Quote: venaya
                  Are we on a religious site to spread misinformation not confirmed by non-religious science here

                  Do not boil. It doesn't paint your epaulettes. Read the books of Zeno Kosidovsky "Biblical Legends" and "Legends of the Evangelists" in the part concerning the Old and New Testaments. By the way, the books I mentioned are not textbooks on religious studies. Just a good Polish biblical historian. Sventitskaya's books on this topic are also good, but she has a heavier style. You should not count other people a priori dumber than yourself. hi
        2. 0
          27 November 2015 10: 18
          Quote: venaya
          The term "Islam" comes from the word "isus"

          Where did you find this crazy statement?
          1. -2
            27 November 2015 11: 10
            Quote: miru mir
            Where did you find this crazy statement?

            He who seeks will always find! Do you doubt the origin of Islam? Give your version, I have already given my (scientifically sound). Your version will probably be from Wikipedia. I have already read these nonsense, no longer need, explain in your own words, without cheat sheets.
            1. 0
              27 November 2015 11: 38
              I have not the slightest doubt about the facts of the origin of Islam - this whole topic has long been studied and confirmed by objective scientific facts. Your version is not justified on anything and is in the field of unscientific fantasy and personal Wishlist.
              1. -4
                27 November 2015 12: 15
                Quote: miru mir
                I have not the slightest doubt about the facts of the origin of Islam - this whole topic has long been studied and confirmed by objective scientific facts.

                What else "scientific facts"you dare to speak here!
                You have a flag after your nickname that is openly not an atheistic, but a religious state with the only state religion, where the "law of God" is compulsorily taught in schools, as a boy studying in Jerusalem told me with hatred. For him it was the most hated subject! Perhaps you are talking about some kind of religious "science", so it has nothing to do with impartial research, I hope you still know that. And what is this term:"objective scientific facts"??? Where can they be found in a state where chutzpah is most practiced in the world instead of normal logic. And by whom."studied topic"Rabinate, or what? You seem to have left the wrong site, this is not a religious site, but a military one, take a closer look at its name.
                1. 0
                  27 November 2015 12: 28
                  I dare to tell you allwhatever I want. And not just you. I express my opinion, and you are arranging here some kind of woman's hysteria. Israel is a secular state. Representatives of any religion, including Islam, feel free here. As long as it does not violate the law. The same is true for atheists. In general education schools they teach what you call "the law of God." As, by the way, in Russia. It's like the history of the Jewish people, that's all.
  3. +2
    27 November 2015 06: 09
    Now Russia has entered the struggle for its interests with very strong opponents. The resources of the parties are incommensurable, the chances of victory in the struggle by traditional means, namely the very same propaganda, diplomacy, economic and military means are few, they are almost nonexistent.


    Yeah, but how did RUSSIA fight and survive the previous centuries ??? ... I do not agree with this postulate.

    The author has very interesting thoughts in the article.

    And the one who wants to survive survives, who fights, who does not trust in the manna from heaven.

    I must say that the idea wins first and foremost, thought then comes with weapons and strength.

    After all, primitive people defeated ancient mammoths with great physical strength precisely by organizing and using hand-held hunting tools.
    In the modern world, little has changed since then.

    If the country can not oppose to a more intelligent opponent nothing but faith in God, ALLAH, etc. it is simply doomed to destruction.

    His faith must always be strengthened by Colt, Mauser, CALIBER at last ... such is the reality today.

    After all, look at the modern ISRAEL .. the country which on the map can be closed with a finger keeps in check all the surrounding Arab countries ... due to the higher development of society ... primarily in the field of science and technology.
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 06: 16
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Yeah, but how did RUSSIA fight and survive the previous centuries ???.

      Christianity ruled as a monopoly in Russia for only two centuries, before that, "two-faith" was widespread - a form of a complex relationship of somewhat different religions.
      1. +4
        27 November 2015 06: 22
        Christianity ruled as a monopoly in Russia for only two centuries, before that, "two-faith" was widespread - a form of a complex relationship of somewhat different religions.

        This did not hinder the development of RUSSIA ...
        People of all confessions served in the Russian army and, it must be said, they served well, with rare exceptions.
  4. +1
    27 November 2015 06: 12
    To me, ghouls! To me, ghouls! ("Viy", N.V. Gogol).
    But seriously, under Yeltsin (God forgive me for remembering the hero of the collapse of the Union), the Kremlin attracted psychics and magicians, and the KGB and the GRU did not eat bread for nothing.
    You can read - http://poistine.org/ekstrasensy-i-kolduny-iz-kgb-i-gru-na-sluzhbe-u-prezidentov#
    .VlfJmjI5qO0
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 06: 24
      This is what kind of power must have gathered, gifted people in order to act on most of humanity.
      By the way, the opposite side may try to do the same.
      The battle of minds and energies in parallel with the war of weapons.
  5. +1
    27 November 2015 06: 16
    Quote: VadimSt
    The Kremlin attracted psychics and magicians. About it, Patrushev told.

    This is not only the Kremlin doing. In fact, ALL governments are doing this.
  6. -1
    27 November 2015 06: 19
    An article about the fact that we play on their field and according to their rules, and therefore the chances of winning are extremely low. The author urges to act "not standard" IMHO.
    1. +6
      27 November 2015 06: 27
      The ability of people to write about simple human things in such an inhuman language has always surprised me, this is the first. Second: who, and by what criteria will determine these reflective? Or, again, another gathering of urban crazy type of battle of psychics?
      1. +3
        27 November 2015 06: 36
        Totally agree with you. Probably the author will be determined with a group of like-minded people (by the way, what is not the basis for organizing a new sect).
        give them time and the opportunity to deal with their unique gift

        While they are dealing with their "unique gift" (if they have one at all), so many events can happen that ...
  7. TTX
    0
    27 November 2015 06: 22
    As I understand it, the author suggests creating a new religion?
    1. +2
      27 November 2015 06: 29
      It is necessary to find and bring together people with this unique reflection, neglecting religious and social prejudices, to give them time and opportunity to deal with their unique gift.


      As an author, this is imagined ... if RUSSIA does not prevent the brain drain.

      We invest a lot of money in the education of talented young people ... raise them to a certain level and then bam ... USA, ISRAEL, GERMANY ... get a ready and talented specialist for free ... he leaves for higher earnings ... MOTHERLAND understand whether it pays little and does not provide the necessary conditions for creative development.

      This is a problem and a big problem for our modern science and industry.
    2. +5
      27 November 2015 06: 30
      Something like that. I am not against the meeting of the elite to resolve global issues and choose the path for the development of society, but only without religious background. hi
    3. +3
      27 November 2015 06: 43
      Quote: TTX
      As I understand it, the author suggests creating a new religion?

      I understand that the author himself does not understand what he wants. Gather people (a certain type (which one?)), Think about something and write or do something. Dregs, in short.
      1. 0
        27 November 2015 13: 23
        The author sins with liberal approaches.
        I agree, the author himself did not fully understand what he wants
      2. The comment was deleted.
    4. +4
      27 November 2015 06: 44
      Quote: TTX
      As I understand it, the author suggests creating a new religion?

      As I understand it, the author fell into the nobility. The liberal’s eternal dream: to play God, which has a clearer definition: let it steer! https://www.proza.ru/2014/09/09/816
      That is to say, Mikhail Vrachevsky is the chosen one: the editorial board in Voennoye Obozreniye got me hooked, rude, which is not surprising at all. But still the material was exposed.
      For some reason I want to add in public opinion and in literary criticism there is no division into styles, but it’s mine.
      For example, your style is Victor, this is the style of a preacher. Of course, this should not be regarded as something canonical, narrow, not at all, it is a very broad and interesting style, it has its own self-development and is very in demand in our culture, because it really was not presented! SO LET DEVELOP IT! Again, my, as soon as we identify the landmarks, remove the chaos, organize it, and there will be an audience. Sorry for the seditious thought, who would Jesus be without the apostles? Another magician?
      My style, as I think. Surprisingly, I am a successor to Jules Verne, this style is also not yet born in Russian literature. The essence is the search for discovery, receiving answers, unlike the same Dostoevsky.
      But people have to work

      Mikhail Vrachevsky 13.09.2014/13/48 XNUMX:XNUMX Alleged violation
  8. 0
    27 November 2015 06: 42
    Professor Savelyev recommends that the authorities engage in cerebral sorting, that is, using accurate diagnostics, to identify the potential makings of each person for a particular activity. Why do not the authorities support such a project? Or do not want the emergence of outstanding personalities in sports, science and politics, capable of powerfully to direct the civilizational flow to the greatest progress, or they understand that most mediocrity is easily predictable and manageable!
  9. +2
    27 November 2015 06: 43
    An excellent suggestion of the author is to climb around the globe, scrape around corners and skerries. Find and appoint a new savior, this time a collective.
    And after that, someone will argue that the machinations of Masons is a conspiracy theory?
    Smile, everyone who tries to equip the world in his own image, the world equips himself, at his discretion.
    1. TTX
      0
      27 November 2015 06: 58
      As the saying goes, Man suggests life has!
  10. +2
    27 November 2015 06: 51
    "It is necessary to find and gather people ...", further in the text. If this is not verbiage, then I really don't know. How will it actually be? Collect and lock everyone for a year or two, straight "Doomed City" will work. The crisis of world religions, you say? Euroshtato-homosexuals have already violated everything they can, there is not a crisis, but a complete tryndets, and I don’t see a crisis in our country. At work, every day I communicate with strangers, so our people are completely sane - they act first of all according to their conscience in case of a problem of choice. For 20-30 people, one is inadequate, one in 100 is insane. Quite good statistics.
  11. +2
    27 November 2015 06: 54
    The most unobtrusive religion is Buddhism. When a muezzin recorded in numbers begins to yell in our village, the muezzin, recorded in numbers, disappears in my international family with disapproving silence. I believe that to believe you do not need these mass departures, which are just a game of those interested in reverence for the incomprehensible.
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 07: 09
      Quote: blizart
      The most unobtrusive religion is Buddhism.

      I do not agree! it is a nonsense! lol
    2. 0
      28 November 2015 18: 52
      Quote: blizart
      The most unobtrusive religion is Buddhism. When a muezzin recorded in numbers begins to yell in our village, the muezzin, recorded in numbers, disappears in my international family with disapproving silence. I believe that to believe you do not need these mass departures, which are just a game of those interested in reverence for the incomprehensible.


      Once upon a time the young got excited and said that our priests themselves were "not that", well, remember the cries of their unrighteousness, not a day passed, so that Orthodoxy would not be doused with mud in the media. And a competent person asked me: "And who are you going to church to? To the priest, or what?" ... Here I got thoughtful ...
      Buddhism (three monkeys, I can’t hear anything, etc.) - Orthodoxy (after hitting the second cheek nothing was written ...) - Islam (they are still young, hot). So think, mankind, how to put it all together. Either we come to an agreement, or the carcasses of light.
    3. 0
      28 November 2015 19: 17
      Quote: blizart
      The most unobtrusive religion is Buddhism ..

      You probably have never been pursued by a column of skinhead youths wrapped in yellow sheets, plate names and wailing
      Hare Krishna, Hare Hare, Hare Rama, Dam Hare wassat
  12. 0
    27 November 2015 06: 55
    A believer strengthens his spirit by faith, in my opinion, the Islamic radicals themselves process mostly young, not yet strong souls, they usually replace and inspire the views of their groups and interests. My opinion, although it does not claim to be true, was puzzled by the permission of same-sex of marriages by some EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN CHURCHES ???? And how many similar examples and doubts can radicals inspire for young people there? To fight for the younger generation is not only the government’s business, but also religions and, first of all, true Islam, it is first and foremost denigrated by extremists.
  13. +1
    27 November 2015 07: 01
    A person has been developing and forming his worldview for more than a dozen years! And throughout this period he is subject to all fluctuations in his outlook. And if God forbid some kind of left religion captures him, then there is an option that he can go crazy. "Perverted philosophers" have learned to convince with all sorts of fables of the rightness and the chosenness of this or that direction. Especially against the background of life's lameness, there are benefactors ready to put on the "true path", here of course such a person needs a support nearby that will not allow him to go down the wrong path. Everything here strongly depends on society! This kind of "democracy" in religions does not lead to anything good. The state should prohibit all sorts of sectarianism and this is better than reigning brains that after 30 years cannot be corrected. And the Internet is a separate story. other obscurantists.
  14. +5
    27 November 2015 07: 07
    And even though atheists do not rub their hands a little, they certainly do not shine.

    Why? Man is the fruit of creation of at least a billion years of evolution


    Absolutely incomprehensible passage. If a person is the fruit of evolution, this is an atheistic point of view, any religion has a countdown from the creation of man by the Most High. Porridge in the head of a friend.
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 07: 18
      Quote: EvgNik
      Why? Man is the fruit of creation of at least a billion years of evolution ...
      Absolutely incomprehensible passage. If man is the fruit of evolution ...

      Evolutionary theory, in connection with the latest scientific research, has not yet found scientific confirmation. Here, for scientists, there is still no end.
    2. 0
      27 November 2015 08: 00
      the Dalai Lama actually got into the top 10 great atheists of our time (according to the magazine "Expert"). No, what is it? Therefore there is nothing surprising

      If you work a little and find out that Buddhism is an atheistic religion, surprise will disappear.
      So don't
      Quote: EvgNik
      any religion has a countdown from the creation of man by the Almighty
      , including such a variety of religion as
      Quote: venaya
      Evolutionary theory
      .
      Don't say that the "temple of science" is just a figure of speech.
  15. +4
    27 November 2015 07: 11
    The crisis of religions arises constantly, that is why religions are periodically renewed, following the development of society. Moreover, each previous religion is declared heresy, paganism. The main religions that proclaim one God, in fact, differ only in the adaptation of religious confessions to local customs, culture, and customs. The teachings of Christ, who can be considered a schismatic for the Jews, were adapted into Christianity, which was first established in the Eastern Roman Empire, then in the Western, displacing the Roman gods. Monotheism was also transferred to the Arabs, Islam was created not without regard to Christianity, but it was already adapted to local customs and culture. To speak on behalf of God, to arrogate to oneself the right to be a kind of ground office from heaven, is very convenient for managing both individuals and entire nations. And, of course, without money, these "offices" do not work, which is why, claiming that God is one, even among Christians, the same Catholics can hate Protestants, forgetting all the commandments. This is encouraged by the confessions themselves, because they need money, power, the influence of their own "department", their religious confession. What did the same Europe give the departure from the gods of the Olympians, to Christianity? The only God that the Roman Empire needed, and, most importantly, Paradise was added to the sad kingdom of Hades, which was very important. With the advent of Paradise, any slave could live with the hope that he would be happy at least after death. Radical Islam has taken this to an extreme, paradise life, in backward, impoverished countries, is the only thing that can give hope to a person. Another crisis of religions has come, the old dogmas stop working as before, another update is needed. Nobody knows that there is God, who created the galaxies, the universe, and who created God himself ... Society is developing, the original faith has been used for a long time, first by shamans and priests, then by various representatives of the clergy. The essence does not change, from the worship of holy groves, idols and spirits, to statues and icons, with invariable sacrifices, from primitive human ones, to animal and financial sacrifices. The new religion, the emergence of which is already ripe, will have to take into account the interests of transnational corporations, that is, to make God even more united, and to correct the outdated "popular" dogmas, on the basis of modern achievements of science and technology, taking into account, presumably, a single paradise and hell for earthlings and aliens. To oppose capitalism, the ghouls of transnational corporations, can only be socialism, with all the ensuing consequences of "opium for the people." If we want to win, neither parallel capitalism nor parallel religion can be created in a foreign pole of power. In the current world capitalism, a multipolar world, without socialism, will be an illusion. And, most importantly, religion and Faith are not the same thing, no one can take away faith from a person, and atheists have it (like hope with love).
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 09: 08
      Quote: Per se.
      A new religion, the appearance of which is already ripe, will have to take into account the interests of transnational corporations,

      The Church of Scientology Worldwide!) - arranges? ... they are asking for favors (they are asking strongly - they are almost driven with batons!) ... into their ranks!
    2. 0
      27 November 2015 09: 10
      In the prevailing world capitalism, a multipolar world, without socialism, will be an illusion.


      And, most importantly, religion and Faith are not the same thing, no one can take away faith from a person, and atheists have it (like hope with love).


      Gold words. I fully support.
  16. cap
    +4
    27 November 2015 07: 16
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    As an author, this is imagined ... if RUSSIA does not prevent the brain drain.

    We invest a lot of money in the education of talented young people ... raise them to a certain level and then bam ... USA, ISRAEL, GERMANY ... get a ready and talented specialist for free ... he leaves for higher earnings ... Do you understand the HOMELAND pays little and does not provide the necessary conditions for creative development.

    This is a problem and a big problem for our modern science.

    After Russia has been taught the Unified State Examination, you can invest as much as you like. The exception of astronomy at school is indicative. The animal should not think about the sky. He has a trough,
    in order to eat.
    Apologists are not asleep. Russia is a supplier of minds, a supplier of raw materials and an importer of consumer goods. We live off the stock of minds from the 60s.
    Just look at the escort of Putin Rogozin and Medvedev at the enterprises of the military-industrial complex and the real sector. All over 60. Modern children, the Pepsi empire, vacancies and career growth, offers McDonald's. Normal brains are bought already at sales abroad. Numerous World Olympiads in all sciences are held not by us and not here.
    I am writing with pain for Russian science, which is forced to bury itself in the ground. hi
  17. +1
    27 November 2015 07: 19
    ... A man writes about religion - obviously not even being a neophyte of any of the religions! But - feeling "religionist"!
    Filming a movie! Who knows how to make a movie - shoots (director); who knows how to play the roles assigned by the director - plays (actor), who knows how to set the frame, light and perspective - makes a movie (cameraman) ... and te ... Anyone who knows nothing knows that - a film expert! not even a viewer! imposes its "unique" everyone's opinion - from a screenwriter, director ... to me - a viewer!
    The same is, say, in painting - who graduated from the Surikov School with honors (it's not me, if that ...) is given a "Malevich square", black. green, red ... which is essentially a primed canvas! and pass it off as a "masterpiece" ...
    The author’s main mistake is that he believes that ALL religions have both PURPOSE and MEANS for the accumulation of material wealth and management with their help of people, masses of people - adherents of the faith.
    However, as you know, it was the "unique reflectives" who did and manage perfectly not only without the accumulation and management of material wealth, but without them at all ... even, excuse me, without food ...
    ... considering religion, at least Orthodoxy, a means of manipulating the masses means stepping on the rake that the Bolsheviks stumbled on ... and not only them! and now many leaders of many countries with an enviable tenacity (worthy of a better application) are stepping on the same rake!
    Atheism, like religiosity, must be moderate and adequate to the situation! fanaticism by nature and society (as any extreme is a deviation from the "average" ...) is not encouraged! ...
    1. +1
      27 November 2015 08: 22
      Exactly! If there is no talent - welcome to ... criticism. Strictly speaking, the integrity and strength of the religious perception of the world is higher than scientific and by logic: religious science is normal, but, here, scientific religious studies is something that cannot be. But the materialists even have an objective TRUE (the essence is dead): "Tell me, oh wisest brick, how to live;)"
  18. +1
    27 November 2015 08: 12
    It seems to me that the author proceeds from not quite correct assumptions. In a sense, it connects the crisis of Islam with the emergence of ISIS. The crisis of Islam, in fact, occurred when they split into Shiites and Sunnis. As it began then, it continues to this day. I mean, they began to cut each other, so they can’t stop.
    Before writing, I would read a little more closely the history of Islam, or something. There are more than enough materials on the Internet.
    PS: By the way, the legs at the emergence of ISIS with all its ideology grow from the 18th century, for a minute.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"