Military Review

In Syria, the power of the Pantsir-С1 missile-gun complexes was tested on the winged Phantom

34
In Syria, the power of the Pantsir-С1 missile-gun complexes was tested on the winged Phantom



The Russian Pantsir-S1 self-propelled anti-aircraft missile-cannon complex (ZRPK) is currently considered to be one of the most advanced systems in its class. These complexes have already been tested not only by tests at various test sites in Russia, but also by real hostilities. It is the “Shell” that is credited with the destruction of the Turkish F-4 “Phantom” II fighter modernized in Israel in June 2012 in the sky of Syria.

The author of this publication for the first time saw a photo of a model complex in 1994 at an exhibition in Nizhny Novgorod. The demonstration of a promising product caused a real stir among foreign guests. In 1995, at the International Aviation and Space Salon in Zhukovsky, which he also visited, the real fighting machine was first introduced to the general public. True, then, externally and in terms of its technical characteristics, the Pantsir was significantly different from the current version. Even the car base was different, the complex was mounted on the four-axle Ural-5323.



Currently, Pantsir-С1, in fact, is almost completely automated complex. Due to the presence of the latest combined weapons and a perfect integrated optical radar system
control weapons, ZRPK able to destroy their various missiles, including small targets, flying at a distance from 1200 to 20 000 m, and at a height from 15 to 15 000 m.

The guns are effective at a range of up to 4000 m and can reach aircraft at heights from 0 to 3000 m.



The maximum speed of the targeted targets is up to 1000 m / s. The complex can simultaneously hit 4 targets. All this rocket-cannon magnificence is served by a crew of just three people.

The characteristics of the complex impressed foreigners very much, and as a result there was even a queue of countries wishing to get this system at all.

The first country that actually tried this complex, which is called, in fact, was Syria. In total, according to the data published in the media, this state has received 2011 complexes and 36 missiles for them before 700, the year.



June 22 A Turkish F-4 Phantom II aircraft invaded the airspace of the Syrian Arab Republic. This winged car underwent a significant modernization at the plant of the company IAI (Israel) and was equipped with modern equipment, including a new complex of electronic countermeasures. However, the Syrians were able to simply detect this target, and after a few moments, the intruder aircraft turned into flaming debris.

Currently, the Pantsir-С1 complexes of the Russian army are guarding the sky in the area of ​​the Hmeymim Syrian airbase.
Author:
Originator:
http://vestnik-rm.ru/news-4-14244.htm
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. yuriy55
    yuriy55 28 November 2015 06: 58 New
    23
    Currently, the Pantsir-C1 complexes of the Russian army protect the sky in the area of ​​the Syrian air base Khmeimim.


    Good luck to our "Shell" and fruitful work ... good
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 28 November 2015 20: 45 New
      +9
      22 June Turkish F-4 Phantom II aircraft invaded the airspace of the Syrian Arab Republic.
      in "Shell" genetic memory is sewn.
  2. igorka357
    igorka357 28 November 2015 07: 04 New
    +7
    Well, it’s like a f-16 fighter versus a Su-24, and at least any modernization !!! Phantom junk and knock it off the “shell” should be a hundred percent out of a hundred ... this is not an indicator .. this is when the “shell” starts to land more modern planes then yes ...
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 28 November 2015 07: 12 New
      11
      This is a small link in the chain that allows you to say:
      ... that any plane that will fly in Syrian airspace, whether from Turkey or from another NATO country, they will fly only with permission, when receiving green light from the Russians ...

      http://warfiles.ru/show-101141-cnn-aviaciya-nato-teper-budet-letat-v-sirii-tolko
      -s-razresheniya-russkih.html
    2. papik09
      papik09 28 November 2015 10: 18 New
      16
      Quote: igorka357
      Phantom Junk

      Sorry, but this one, as you put it, has a "junk" speed of more than 2 Machs. hi
      Do not be lazy and "follow" the link
      http://www.razlib.ru/tehnicheskie_nauki/sverhzvukovye_samolety/p86.php
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 28 November 2015 11: 41 New
      +6
      Quote: igorka357
      ! Phantom junk and knock it off the "shell" should be a hundred percent out of a hundred ... this is not an indicator .. that's when the "shell" starts to land more modern aircraft then yes ...

      To be objective, but to “knock down” fighters is not the main thing that the Shell is imprisoned for. Its main task, for which it was developed, is to intercept and destroy the KR.
    4. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 29 November 2015 05: 07 New
      +2
      Quote: igorka357
      Phantom junk and knock it off the "carapace" should be one hundred percent out of a hundred.

      do not confuse the F-4 60s-70s-80s, with the current, quite a pumped ...
  3. Sirocco
    Sirocco 28 November 2015 07: 33 New
    +5
    I hope that this is the complexes of Russia, sober hotheads wanting to shit.
    Now, about Phantom, Erdogan recall this provocation, and his statements on this incident. The author forgot to mention that it was a reconnaissance aircraft.
    The Turkish F-4 fighter flew from Malatya air base in eastern Turkey. Ankara claims that there were no weapons on board. She also recognized the fact of a short-term violation by this aircraft of Syrian airspace. According to Western media, a number of Phantoms armed with the Turkish Air Force (this type of aircraft were used by the United States during the Vietnam War) went through modernization at the enterprises of the Israeli company IAI, where they installed modern navigation and reconnaissance equipment.
  4. NeRTT
    NeRTT 28 November 2015 07: 39 New
    14
    Quote: igorka357
    Well, it’s like a f-16 fighter versus a Su-24, and at least any modernization !!! Phantom junk and knock it off the “shell” should be a hundred percent out of a hundred ... this is not an indicator .. this is when the “shell” starts to land more modern planes then yes ...

    This latest generation EW Phantom ... So the result is still impressive !! good
  5. Asadali
    Asadali 28 November 2015 07: 55 New
    +5
    In Syria, the power of the Pantsir-С1 missile-gun complexes was tested on the winged Phantom


    Bummer! am And I thought ours already scanned the Turkish phantom in revenge.
  6. Asadali
    Asadali 28 November 2015 07: 59 New
    +3
    In Syria, the power of the Pantsir-С1 missile-gun complexes was tested on the winged Phantom

    And what does a “WINGED” phantom mean? bully
    1. Seal
      Seal 28 November 2015 09: 27 New
      0
      Yes, I also noticed.
    2. Mooh
      Mooh 28 November 2015 14: 31 New
      +1
      Yes, the author was mistaken by the section. He would have to go to the military archive, but better to some other resource. wink
    3. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 30 November 2015 05: 29 New
      +2
      A phantom is a ghost .... the author has the right to assume that there are “winged” and winged ghosts .. it all depends on the number of drunk and the individual tolerance of alcohol.
  7. cergey51046
    cergey51046 28 November 2015 08: 51 New
    -8
    What a technique, we would still have the commanders of the wise, otherwise the planes will be shot down.
    1. provincial
      provincial 28 November 2015 11: 50 New
      +1
      patience and patience and everything will be.
  8. MT266
    MT266 28 November 2015 09: 28 New
    +2
    the more Phantoms, the more experience our designers have. Let them just try to rock the boat to Syria! good soldier
  9. samoletil18
    samoletil18 28 November 2015 09: 39 New
    +1
    I remembered something. When I saw it for the first time on TV, I decided that we had our Tunguska on a wheelbase. But no, the new complex! Another thing completely.
  10. Gray 43
    Gray 43 28 November 2015 09: 55 New
    +2
    The chassis on the basis of the KamAZ military was not very comfortable, it is impossible to fire on the move, the machine may tip over
    1. shonsu
      shonsu 28 November 2015 13: 15 New
      0
      when shooting with guns, yes, maybe there’s a big return. when firing rockets there is no recoil, you can probably shoot in motion.
  11. Nymp
    Nymp 28 November 2015 10: 08 New
    -4
    Clear business Turks do not like! And what did they want when joining NATO? It’s clear that the mattresses are outdated, then, at the price of a new one, the Turks, and even Israel, fell off for modernization. And the junk was opposed to our DRY! The puppy delight is now clear when our SU-24 knocked down their trough. They would try to fight with the SU-34. NATO slaves.
    1. U-96
      U-96 28 November 2015 12: 23 New
      0
      Quote: Nymp
      Clear business Turks do not like! And what did they want when joining NATO?

      it was back in 1952. What questions did you know on the agenda of Soviet-Turkish relations then?
      Quote: Nymp
      NATO slaves.

      why are "slaves"? One of the oldest members of the unfriendly military-political bloc. "Serfs" would not make a smut of their master ugly behavior.
      1. Nymp
        Nymp 28 November 2015 15: 33 New
        +2
        Quote: U-96
        why are "slaves"? One of the oldest members of the unfriendly military-political bloc. "Serfs" would not make a smut of their master ugly behavior.

        And the fact that immediately after the incident, the Turks ran under the wing of NATO and for the support of Washington, is this in your opinion just the peak of independence?
  12. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 28 November 2015 10: 30 New
    +2
    We have repeatedly stepped on the same rake. The Russian people want to trust, but foreign "colleagues" demonstrate complete degradation in this plan. It is indicative of Turkey. We again trusted them and paid. And now they have closed the sky completely over Syria. It’s a pity that such things happen at the cost of the lives of our pilots. Can maintain its ranking of countries with a bad reputation? And publish it ... to disgrace for such things! Like the rating of traitor countries in 2015 and went: Turkey, the USA, Hohland, etc.
    1. U-96
      U-96 28 November 2015 12: 27 New
      +2
      Quote: dchegrinec
      Russian man wants to trust

      Russian people do not want and will not trust to nobody. Not by virtue of some kind of hypertrophic suspicion, but solely following the instinct of self-preservation. Despite the fact that the GDP called the vile share of the Turks a “stab in the back”, we never had any trusting relations with them. Especially in the context of the ATS.
    2. Yak28
      Yak28 28 November 2015 13: 06 New
      +1
      Quote: dchegrinec
      We have repeatedly stepped on the same rake. The Russian people want to trust, but foreign "colleagues" demonstrate complete degradation in this plan. It is indicative of Turkey. We again trusted them and paid. And now they have closed the sky completely over Syria. It’s a pity that such things happen at the cost of the lives of our pilots. Can maintain its ranking of countries with a bad reputation? And publish it ... to disgrace for such things! Like the rating of traitor countries in 2015 and went: Turkey, the USA, Hohland, etc.

      I also don’t understand why our leadership doesn’t see that no one is friends with Russia, but only takes advantage of it. And we also don’t want to impose friends on anyone. France is also a NATO country of a hostile military bloc, no alliances with it can’t be, but it’s quite possible to get a fuck from the French
      1. Evil Kind
        Evil Kind 29 November 2015 06: 33 New
        0
        Well, what do you seriously take the words of politicians, it’s just diplomatic etiquette (a game). You’re also talking to your “beloved” mother-in-law directly what you think about her. That’s customary. My friend kept cursing at Putin in 2008 before the crisis for saying that “the crisis will not affect us,” I explained the task of delaying him, even through reputational losses (misled people). What would happen to banks if the president himself declared a guard! But a friend probably liked to think that he was one prophet, and no one understood what was happening. You remind me of my friend now. belay Yes, and more .... remember, politicians have three things that never coincide: 1) what they think; 2) what they say; and 3) what they do.
  13. chelovektapok
    chelovektapok 28 November 2015 12: 22 New
    +1
    Good stuff! But even a slender blonde can goof in the back. As in “The meeting place cannot be changed”: Why is it that you are tied up in your head? - Yes, they don’t like our woman’s Kolya "(c) G. Zheglov
  14. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 28 November 2015 12: 45 New
    +1
    But what about our special forces? It is time to start training Syrian fighters with our instructors, and move along the DAESH rear. With full air conquest, only target designation is needed. It is clear that these should be local, and well-trained guys. How long can such groups prepare? IMHO, three months. So we will wait for the increase in the effectiveness of the air force strikes in January - February. And no one doubted the effectiveness of our air defense systems.
    1. SlavaP
      SlavaP 28 November 2015 18: 35 New
      0
      For special forces there are more interesting goals - Qatar for example, or Saudi Arabia. I think that in the near future there will be a couple of high-profile liquidations or that the oil terminal will “accidentally” take off (poorly with safety measures ...)
      1. vandarus
        vandarus 28 November 2015 21: 17 New
        +2
        GRU special forces groups are preparing for a certain theater of operations, for obvious reasons we mainly have a European theater of operations. In Syria, by the way, it is not in vain that the Iranian special forces operate, which carried out the operation to rescue our officer.
        And in general, with all due respect, my attitude to the GRU special forces is rather skeptical. In Chechnya, it was used as assault units, and in the war on 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX it showed its low efficiency.
        I watched Carapace C about a certain TV program (I don’t remember the name), so they tried to spot the crew quadcopter with the complex’s detection tools, and as a result, it was possible at a distance of less than 50 meters after an awkward bustle with optical-electronic detection only.
        1. would
          would 30 November 2015 01: 59 New
          0
          With quadrocopters and similar mini and micro UAVs, a widespread problem. A low-emitting target with small dimensions and it is not clear how to detect it and even more so to shoot it down. The whole world is now looking for solutions.
  15. Wiskar
    Wiskar 29 November 2015 23: 32 New
    +1
    Vietnam refused to purchase Russian Shell-C1 air defense systems in favor of the Israeli SPYDER complex

    The military leadership of Vietnam opted for the SPYDER air defense system developed in Israel, military-informant.com reports.

    This became officially known from an interview in the newspaper of the People’s Army, Lieutenant General Le Zui Vinh, Commander of the Air Defense Forces of Vietnam.

    Mr. Le Zui Vin said that the armed forces of Vietnam will be replenished with modern air defense systems, combining modern radars ELM-2288, radar 36D6, radar chain mail and missile systems "SPYDER" and S-300PMU1.

    It is worth noting that the SPYDER short-range anti-aircraft missile system competed with the Russian development Shell-C1 in a tender for equipping the air defense and air forces of Vietnam. In view of the secrecy of the military department of Vietnam, the reasons for choosing the Israeli SPYDER complex are not exactly known.

    The SPYDER air defense system was developed by a consortium of Israeli companies Rafael and Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI). The first version of the system was demonstrated in 2005 at the Paris Air Show in Le Bourget.

    Short-range and medium-range mobile anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) SPYDER (Surface-to-Air PYton and DERby) is designed for air defense of ground forces units and infrastructure objects (command posts, communication centers, radio equipment, bridges, airfields) from aircraft attacks , helicopters, cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles. The complex ensures the defeat of single and group targets at any time of the day and in any climatic conditions.

    SPYDER SR - The complex includes: a reconnaissance and control point (PRU), self-propelled launchers (SPU) with four transport and launch containers for missiles and transport-loading vehicles (TZM).
    Elements of air defense systems are installed on the chassis of the Tatra car (wheel formula - 6 × 6).
    The battery may include up to six SPU.
    The radar station EL / M 2106NG has a circular view, a three-coordinate pulse-Doppler radar, the operating frequency range is 1-2 GHz, the target detection range is 35 km, the number of simultaneously tracked targets is 60, transmission of commands over the air.

    Used SAM
    “Derby” (target destruction range - up to 15 km, target destruction height - from 20 m to 9 km, active homing radar, high-explosive fragmentation warhead);
    "Python 5" (range of hitting targets - up to 20 km, height of hitting targets - from 20 m to 9 km, infrared homing head).

    SPYDER MR-

    The complex includes: a control point, a radar station, self-propelled launchers with eight transport and launch containers for missiles and transport-loading vehicles (TZM).

    Elements of air defense systems are installed on the chassis of a terrain vehicle (wheel formula - 6 × 6).

    The battery may include up to six SPU.

    The performance characteristics [edit | edit wiki text]
    Used missiles "Derby" and "Python-5" with a range of up to 35 km and a height of targets in the range of 20-16 000 meters (due to the installation of the starting engine). Missiles have the ability to maneuver at the final stage of flight with overloads of up to 12 g.

    Radar MF STAR - all-round visibility, target detection range - 100 km, the number of simultaneously tracked targets - 60.
    1. cheguevarazhiv
      cheguevarazhiv 22 January 2016 13: 19 New
      0
      The fact of the matter is that the Vietnamese Ministry of Defense is too closed ... therefore, it is impossible to judge why our complex was not bought because there are too many unknowns (for what purposes and tasks it should have been used - this makes the endless vector of requirements from the Ministry of Defense, cost , options and schemes for technical warranty and post-warranty services, etc., etc., ending with the depth of pockets and the greed of the procurement persons)
  16. 25ru
    25ru 30 November 2015 05: 45 New
    0
    Those who served in the SV air defense, correct, if I am mistaken, but in the ZRAB of the motorized rifle / tank regiment there was a platoon ZSU-23-4 and a platoon of SZRK "Strela-10". Four cars each. The “Shell”, it seems, has a different ideology of use - covering the deployed order of troops and rear facilities, rather than marching cover for troops.
    And according to the material. If "Currently, the Pantsir-C1 complexes of the Russian army protect the sky in the area of ​​the Syrian air base Hmeimim"then where are 36 Syrian?
  17. tchoni
    tchoni 30 November 2015 08: 17 New
    0
    Speaking about the “armor”, one should not forget that he, like the “shilka” and “tunguska”, was created, first of all, as an element of the INTENDED air defense system ... No matter what they say about the properties of the complex, there is no one in the field ... And for the effective use of the machine, the deployment of several echelons of air defense is required, which, in fact, is observed in Syria.