In Syria, the power of the rocket-cannon systems "Shell-S1" was tested on the winged "Phantom"

The Russian Pantsir-S1 self-propelled anti-aircraft missile-cannon complex (ZRPK) is currently considered to be one of the most advanced systems in its class. These complexes have already been tested not only by tests at various test sites in Russia, but also by real hostilities. It is the “Shell” that is credited with the destruction of the Turkish F-4 “Phantom” II fighter modernized in Israel in June 2012 in the sky of Syria.

The author of this publication for the first time saw a photo of a model complex in 1994 at an exhibition in Nizhny Novgorod. The demonstration of a promising product caused a real stir among foreign guests. In 1995, at the International Aviation and Space Salon in Zhukovsky, which he also visited, the real fighting machine was first introduced to the general public. True, then, externally and in terms of its technical characteristics, the Pantsir was significantly different from the current version. Even the car base was different, the complex was mounted on the four-axle Ural-5323.

Currently, Pantsir-С1, in fact, is almost completely automated complex. Due to the presence of the latest combined weapons and a perfect integrated optical radar system
control weapons, ZRPK able to destroy their various missiles, including small targets, flying at a distance from 1200 to 20 000 m, and at a height from 15 to 15 000 m.

The guns are effective at a range of up to 4000 m and can reach aircraft at heights from 0 to 3000 m.

The maximum speed of the targeted targets is up to 1000 m / s. The complex can simultaneously hit 4 targets. All this rocket-cannon magnificence is served by a crew of just three people.

The characteristics of the complex impressed foreigners very much, and as a result there was even a queue of countries wishing to get this system at all.

The first country that actually tried this complex, which is called, in fact, was Syria. In total, according to the data published in the media, this state has received 2011 complexes and 36 missiles for them before 700, the year.

June 22 A Turkish F-4 Phantom II aircraft invaded the airspace of the Syrian Arab Republic. This winged car underwent a significant modernization at the plant of the company IAI (Israel) and was equipped with modern equipment, including a new complex of electronic countermeasures. However, the Syrians were able to simply detect this target, and after a few moments, the intruder aircraft turned into flaming debris.

Currently, the Pantsir-С1 complexes of the Russian army are guarding the sky in the area of ​​the Hmeymim Syrian airbase.

Comments

[yuriy55]

Currently, the Pantsir-С1 complexes of the Russian army are guarding the sky in the area of ​​the Hmeymim Syrian airbase.

Good luck to our "Shell" and fruitful work ...

[Andrey Yuryevich]

22 June A Turkish F-4 Phantom II aircraft has entered the airspace of the Syrian Arab Republic.

genetic memory is sewn into the "PANTSIR".

[igorka357]

Well, it's like a type of f-16 fighter against a su-24, but at least any modernization !!! The phantom is old and its "shell" should be knocked down in one hundred percent out of a hundred ... this is not an indicator .. that's when the "shell" will start to land more modern planes then yes ...

[yuriy55]

This is a small link in the chain that allows you to say:

... that any plane that will fly in Syrian airspace, whether from Turkey or from another NATO country, they will fly only with permission, when receiving green light from the Russians ...

http://warfiles.ru/show-101141-cnn-aviaciya-nato-teper-budet-letat-v-sirii-tolko
-s-resolution-english.html

[papik09]

Quote: igorka357

Phantom Junk

Sorry, but this, as you put it, "old" speed is more than 2 Machs.
Do not be lazy and follow the link
http://www.razlib.ru/tehnicheskie_nauki/sverhzvukovye_samolety/p86.php

[NEXUS]

Quote: igorka357

! Phantom junk and knock off its "shell" should be one hundred percent out of a hundred ... this is not an indicator .. that's when the "shell" starts to land more modern aircraft then yes ...

To be objective, but "knocking down" fighters is not the main thing under what Pantsir is imprisoned. Its main task, for which it was developed, is to intercept and destroy the CD.

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: igorka357

The phantom is old and its "shell" should be knocked down in one hundred percent out of a hundred.

do not confuse the F-4 60s-70s-80s, with the current, quite a pumped ...

[Sirocco]

I hope that this is the complexes of Russia, sober hotheads wanting to shit.
Now, about Phantom, Erdogan recall this provocation, and his statements on this incident. The author forgot to mention that it was a reconnaissance aircraft.

The Turkish F-4 fighter flew from Malatya air base in eastern Turkey. Ankara claims that there were no weapons on board. She also recognized the fact of a short-term violation by this aircraft of Syrian airspace. According to Western media, a number of Phantoms armed with the Turkish Air Force (this type of aircraft were used by the United States during the Vietnam War) went through modernization at the enterprises of the Israeli company IAI, where they installed modern navigation and reconnaissance equipment.

[NeRTT]

Quote: igorka357

Well, it's like a type of f-16 fighter against a su-24, but at least any modernization !!! The phantom is old and its "shell" should be knocked down in one hundred percent out of a hundred ... this is not an indicator .. that's when the "shell" will start to land more modern planes then yes ...

This latest generation EW Phantom ... So the result is still impressive !!

[Asadali]

In Syria, the power of the rocket-cannon systems "Shell-S1" was tested on the winged "Phantom"

Bummer! And I thought ours already scanned the Turkish phantom in revenge.

[Asadali]

In Syria, the power of the rocket-cannon systems "Shell-S1" was tested on the winged "Phantom"

And what does "WINGED" phantom mean?

[Seal]

Yes, I also noticed.

[Mooh]

Yes, the author was mistaken by the section. He would have to go to the military archive, but better to some other resource.

[Nikolaevich I]

A phantom is a ghost .... the author has the right to consider. That "there are" winged and non-winged ghosts .. it all depends on the amount drunk and on the individual tolerance of alcohol.

[cergey51046]

What a technique, we would still have the commanders of the wise, otherwise the planes will be shot down.

[provincial]

patience and patience and everything will be.

[MT266]

the more "Phantoms" the more experience our designers have. Let them just try to rock the boat into Syria!

[samoletil18]

I remembered something. When I saw it for the first time on TV, I decided that we had our Tunguska on a wheelbase. But no, the new complex! Another thing completely.

[Gray 43]

The chassis on the basis of "KamAZ" did not suit the military very well - it is impossible to fire in motion, the car may overturn

[shonsu]

when shooting with guns, yes, maybe there’s a big return. when firing rockets there is no recoil, you can probably shoot in motion.

[Nymp]

Clear business Turks do not like! And what did they want when joining NATO? It’s clear that the mattresses are outdated, then, at the price of a new one, the Turks, and even Israel, fell off for modernization. And the junk was opposed to our DRY! The puppy delight is now clear when our SU-24 knocked down their trough. They would try to fight with the SU-34. NATO slaves.

[U-96]

Quote: Nymp

Clear business Turks do not like! And what did they want when joining NATO?

it was back in 1952. What questions did you know on the agenda of Soviet-Turkish relations then?

Quote: Nymp

NATO slaves.

why "slaves"? One of the oldest members of the unfriendly military-political bloc. "Serfs" would not make a mess of their master with ugly behavior.

[Nymp]

Quote: U-96

why "slaves"? One of the oldest members of the unfriendly military-political bloc. "Serfs" would not make a mess of their master with ugly behavior.

And the fact that immediately after the incident, the Turks ran under the wing of NATO and for the support of Washington, is this in your opinion just the peak of independence?

[dchegrinec]

We have repeatedly stepped on the same rake. The Russian person wants to trust, but foreign "colleagues" demonstrate complete degradation in this plan. It is indicative of Turkey. We again trusted them and paid the price. And now they have completely closed the sky over Syria. It is a pity that such things happen at the cost of our pilots' lives. Can you conduct your own rating of countries with a crumpled reputation? And publish it ... to shame for such things! Like a rating of traitorous countries in 2015 and went: Turkey, USA, Hohland, etc.

[U-96]

Quote: dchegrinec

Russian man wants to trust

Russian people do not want and will not trust to nobody... Not because of some hypertrophied suspicion, but solely following the instinct of self-preservation. Despite the fact that VVP called the dastardly action of the Turks "a stab in the back," we never had any trusting relationship with them, especially in the context of the SAR.

[Yak28]

Quote: dchegrinec

We have repeatedly stepped on the same rake. The Russian person wants to trust, but foreign "colleagues" demonstrate complete degradation in this plan. It is indicative of Turkey. We again trusted them and paid the price. And now they have completely closed the sky over Syria. It is a pity that such things happen at the cost of our pilots' lives. Can you conduct your own rating of countries with a crumpled reputation? And publish it ... to shame for such things! Like a rating of traitorous countries in 2015 and went: Turkey, USA, Hohland, etc.

I also don’t understand why our leadership doesn’t see that no one is friends with Russia, but only takes advantage of it. And we also don’t want to impose friends on anyone. France is also a NATO country of a hostile military bloc, no alliances with it can’t be, but it’s quite possible to get a fuck from the French

[Evil Kind]

Well, what do you take seriously the words of politicians, this is just diplomatic etiquette (a game). You say to your "beloved" mother-in-law, what you think about her, too. My friend kept swearing at Putin in 2008 before the crisis because he said “the crisis will not affect us,” I explained the task of delaying it, even by reputational losses (misleading people). What would happen to banks if the president himself said, watch! But his friend probably liked to think that he was one prophet, and no one understood what was happening. You remind me of my friend now. Yes, and more .... remember, politicians have three things that never coincide: 1) what they think; 2) what they say; and 3) what they do.

[chelovektapok]

Good thing! But even a slender blonde can go nuts in the back. As in "The Meeting Place Cannot Be Changed": Why is your head tied? - Yes, Kolya our women do not like "(c) G. Zheglov

[Mountain shooter]

But what about our special forces? It is time to start training Syrian fighters with our instructors, and move along the DAESH rear. With full air conquest, only target designation is needed. It is clear that these should be local, and well-trained guys. How long can such groups prepare? IMHO, three months. So we will wait for the increase in the effectiveness of the air force strikes in January - February. And no one doubted the effectiveness of our air defense systems.

[SlavaP]

For special forces, there are more interesting targets - Qatar, for example, or Saudia. I think that in the near future there will be a couple of high-profile liquidations or "accidentally" that air of the oil terminal will take off (bad safety ...)

[vandarus]

GRU special forces groups are preparing for a certain theater of operations, for obvious reasons we mainly have a European theater of operations. In Syria, by the way, it is not in vain that the Iranian special forces operate, which carried out the operation to rescue our officer.
And in general, with all due respect, my attitude to the GRU special forces is rather skeptical. In Chechnya, it was used as assault units, and in the war on 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX it showed its low efficiency.
I watched Carapace C about a certain TV program (I don’t remember the name), so they tried to spot the crew quadcopter with the complex’s detection tools, and as a result, it was possible at a distance of less than 50 meters after an awkward bustle with optical-electronic detection only.

[would]

With quadrocopters and similar mini and micro UAVs, a widespread problem. A low-emitting target with small dimensions and it is not clear how to detect it and even more so to shoot it down. The whole world is now looking for solutions.

[Wiskar]

Vietnam refused to purchase Russian Shell-C1 air defense systems in favor of the Israeli SPYDER complex

The military leadership of Vietnam opted for the SPYDER air defense system developed in Israel, military-informant.com reports.

This became officially known from an interview in the newspaper of the People’s Army, Lieutenant General Le Zui Vinh, Commander of the Air Defense Forces of Vietnam.

Mr. Le Zui Vin said that the armed forces of Vietnam will be replenished with modern air defense systems, combining modern radars ELM-2288, radar 36D6, radar chain mail and missile systems "SPYDER" and S-300PMU1.

It is worth noting that the SPYDER short-range anti-aircraft missile system competed with the Russian development Shell-C1 in a tender for equipping the air defense and air forces of Vietnam. In view of the secrecy of the military department of Vietnam, the reasons for choosing the Israeli SPYDER complex are not exactly known.

The SPYDER air defense system was developed by a consortium of Israeli companies Rafael and Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI). The first version of the system was demonstrated in 2005 at the Paris Air Show in Le Bourget.

Short-range and medium-range mobile anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) SPYDER (Surface-to-Air PYton and DERby) is designed for air defense of ground forces units and infrastructure objects (command posts, communication centers, radio equipment, bridges, airfields) from aircraft attacks , helicopters, cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles. The complex ensures the defeat of single and group targets at any time of the day and in any climatic conditions.

SPYDER SR - The complex includes: a reconnaissance and control point (PRU), self-propelled launchers (SPU) with four transport and launch containers for missiles and transport-loading vehicles (TZM).
Elements of air defense systems are installed on the chassis of the Tatra car (wheel formula - 6 × 6).
The battery may include up to six SPU.
The radar station EL / M 2106NG has a circular view, a three-coordinate pulse-Doppler radar, the operating frequency range is 1-2 GHz, the target detection range is 35 km, the number of simultaneously tracked targets is 60, transmission of commands over the air.

Used SAM
“Derby” (target destruction range - up to 15 km, target destruction height - from 20 m to 9 km, active homing radar, high-explosive fragmentation warhead);
"Python 5" (range of hitting targets - up to 20 km, height of hitting targets - from 20 m to 9 km, infrared homing head).

SPYDER MR-

The complex includes: a control point, a radar station, self-propelled launchers with eight transport and launch containers for missiles and transport-loading vehicles (TZM).

Elements of air defense systems are installed on the chassis of a terrain vehicle (wheel formula - 6 × 6).

The battery may include up to six SPU.

The performance characteristics [edit | edit wiki text]
Used missiles "Derby" and "Python-5" with a range of up to 35 km and a height of targets in the range of 20-16 000 meters (due to the installation of the starting engine). Missiles have the ability to maneuver at the final stage of flight with overloads of up to 12 g.

Radar MF STAR - all-round visibility, target detection range - 100 km, the number of simultaneously tracked targets - 60.

[cheguevarazhiv]

The fact of the matter is that the Vietnamese Ministry of Defense is too closed ... therefore, it is impossible to judge why our complex was not bought because there are too many unknowns (for what purposes and tasks it should have been used - this makes the endless vector of requirements from the Ministry of Defense, cost , options and schemes for technical warranty and post-warranty services, etc., etc., ending with the depth of pockets and the greed of the procurement persons)

[25ru]

Those who served in the air defense of the ground forces, correct if I am mistaken, but in the staff of the ZRAB motorized rifle / tank regiment there was a platoon of ZSU-23-4 and a platoon of SZRK "Strela-10". Four cars each. The "Pantsir", it seems, has a different ideology of application - covering the deployed formations of troops and rear facilities, and not marching cover of troops.
And according to the material. If "At present, the Pantsir-C1 complexes of the Russian army are guarding the sky in the area of ​​the Syrian airbase Khmeimim"then where are 36 Syrian?

[tchoni]

Speaking about the “armor”, one should not forget that he, like the “shilka” and “tunguska”, was created, first of all, as an element of the INTENDED air defense system ... No matter what they say about the properties of the complex, there is no one in the field ... And for the effective use of the machine, the deployment of several echelons of air defense is required, which, in fact, is observed in Syria.