Britain does not exclude aggressive intentions of the Russian Federation towards NATO

59
According to the text of the new British defense strategy, London does not exclude the manifestation of aggression against NATO countries, reports RIA News.



“Russia is currently working on a program of major investments in the modernization and improvement of its armed forces, including nuclear ones. She also increased the number of military exercises and intensified rhetoric, threatening to deploy elements of nuclear forces in Kaliningrad and Crimea. Its military activity around the Allied territories, near the airspace and the territorial waters of Great Britain is aimed at testing our reaction, ”the document says.

“Russia's behavior continues to be hard-to-predict, and although this is highly unlikely, we cannot rule out that it may feel tempted to show aggression towards NATO countries,” the text says.

According to the authors of the strategy, now the UK is not in danger.

“However, more and more often, our reaction is being checked with the help of airplanes, including Russian ones, approaching our airspace, and actions at sea near our territorial waters ... Our investments in naval intelligence aircraft will help to significantly improve our ability to ensure the safety of our waters”, - the document says.

“We provided our Typhoon aircraft to the NATO air patrol mission of the Baltic Sea, we provided ships and army units for NATO exercises to help our allies to repel the threat from Russia, and we will continue to do that,” the document says.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    24 November 2015 15: 26
    The Russian Federation pursues its foreign policy. This alone makes it an aggressor towards the West and NATO. How good it was at the time of the manual Tagged and Drunk.
    1. +40
      24 November 2015 15: 28
      gentlemen hypocrites from London ... enough to judge people by themselves, and so they robbed half the world ... your London museum-evidence of the largest world fuss ....
      1. +12
        24 November 2015 15: 33
        Britain does not exclude aggressive intentions of the Russian Federation towards NATO
        They were surprised! So Russia does not exclude aggressive actions against NATO, if you rock on us! This is in our current doctrine for almost a year as prescribed!
        1. +4
          24 November 2015 15: 48
          And England and all other Britain and NATO are our enemies.
          And there is nothing to fool people.
          The enemy is the enemy.
          1. +2
            24 November 2015 15: 56
            Vladimir Putin meets with King of Jordan Abdullah II Ben Al Hussein
          2. +8
            24 November 2015 16: 02
            Britain does not exclude aggressive intentions of the Russian Federation towards NATO


            Lies, lies and again lies !!! The most deceitful country has unleashed dozens of wars, and itself has avoided them.

            Quote: Temples
            And England and all other Britain and NATO are our enemies.
            And there is nothing to fool people.
            The enemy is the enemy.
            + + + 100000
          3. +1
            24 November 2015 16: 24
            You, dear comrade, do not care at all about our business representatives, you want to deprive them of their "family nest".
            1. 0
              24 November 2015 23: 07
              Quote: varov14
              ... you want to deprive them of their "family nest".

              The hollow is their "family nest".
      2. +3
        24 November 2015 15: 35
        Quote: Britain does not exclude the aggressive intentions of the Russian Federation against NATO [/ quote


        Well, yes, we, like the "wrong" bees, have gotten a grudge against NATO.
        Enough!
      3. +6
        24 November 2015 15: 42
        gentlemen hypocrites from london
        "There is a hat on the thief," (although the document that was being prepared for a long time and was submitted to parliament and today's Turkish provocation is apparently not connected) the feeling that the Angilian woman is shitting again - the same card is played as in the Russian-Turkish or Japanese, but that is always the case - to unleash war with someone else's hands and warm up by the fire
        1. +1
          24 November 2015 23: 12
          Quote: Gani
          ... they play the same card as in Russian-Turkish or Japanese, ...

          Here! It is the most! And the feeling that everything is very connected. Neatly so ... First - the "threat", then - the "main threat", and now these Ottoman utyrk ... Straight from what was written. And now NATO, represented by Stoltenberg, has supported the Turks. Violated airspace ... national security ... sovereignty ... and all that. And someone hoped that NATO would do it to the Turks. Su ... ki in general.
    2. +11
      24 November 2015 15: 28
      The mere existence of Russia and its own position makes it an aggressor for NATO.
      1. +25
        24 November 2015 15: 32
        November 24, 2015 14:23:27

        According to Turkish media reports, the S-400, which is not officially there (is there an analogue on ships?), Has been activated in Syria and is leading all Turkish military fighters near the border with Syria.
        There was no order to shoot down so far, but it can arrive at any second, as soon as Russia considers that Turkish fighters crossed the Syrian border for 5-10 seconds.

        Specifically English heading: A Turkish jet just obtained an appointment with Russian S-400 as a live target.

        There is no more detailed information yet, but most likely Russia has actually activated air defense / missile defense systems for Turkish targets in order to secure the search mission. At the moment, it can be stated that the Turkish Air Force is regarded as hostile, which means that any entry into the affected area will be considered as an attack and Turkish aircraft will be shot down.
        1. +8
          24 November 2015 15: 39
          Oh ce garne! And do not turn it off until in Syria we have finished all things. And what we have there, and what not, let them guess. And they fly cautiously, not flying a millimeter into the territory.
        2. +6
          24 November 2015 15: 59
          Quote: Bombardier
          At the moment, it can be stated that the Turkish Air Force is regarded as hostile, which means that any entry into the affected area will be considered as an attack and Turkish aircraft will be shot down.

          The emphasis is right ... it was a stab in the back.
          15:53 ​​TRAGEDY WITH RUSSIAN PLANE IN SYRIA WILL HAVE SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES FOR RELATIONS OF MOSCOW AND ANKARA - Vladimir Putin
          15:52 SU-24 Crash IN SYRIA - A STAB IN THE BACK BY TERRORISM ASSISTANTS — Vladimir Putin

          last thing
          15:56 TURKEY INSTEAD OF IMMEDIATE CONTACT WITH RUSSIA AFTER THE INCIDENT WITH SU-24, APPEALED TO NATO AS IF IT IS RUSSIA SHOT DOWN THEIR PLANE – Vladimir Putin
        3. +2
          24 November 2015 16: 10
          Already fussed ... today an emergency meeting of NATO on the occasion of the downing of a Russian plane .. NATO will hold an emergency meeting in Brussels at 5 pm local time on Tuesday after a Russian warplane violating Turkish airspace was shot down, a NATO official told Anadolu Agency.
          1. 0
            24 November 2015 16: 21
            Turkish Picture ..
            http://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/turkey-repeatedly-warned-russian-warplane-violati
            ng-airspace / 480406

            .there they do not have enough radar field to determine with such accuracy as they show the location of the aircraft. yes and without a doubt the radar there is high time to go to the museum
      2. +7
        24 November 2015 15: 39
        Quote: Free Cossack
        The mere existence of Russia and its own position makes it an aggressor for NATO.

        This statement of London is just a consequence of the fact that our bomber was shot down by the Turks. At the same time, they reacted too quickly. Accordingly, the decision on such diversion was not without them.
      3. +4
        24 November 2015 15: 59
        Quote: Free Cossack
        The mere existence of Russia and its own position makes it an aggressor for NATO.

        ------------------
        Today, NATO has shown aggression against us ... So the British turned everything out with their fur ...
      4. +2
        24 November 2015 16: 03
        Quote: Free Cossack
        The mere existence of Russia and its own position makes it an aggressor for NATO.

        More precisely, not an aggressor for NATO, but a threat of an inevitable and destructive retaliatory strike against NATO. And who is the source of aggression - so the plans "Unthinkable" and "Dropshot" were shown in modern history, and Churchill told in Fulton ...

        I would point them in the nose at any mention of the "Russian threat", but who knows about aggression and occupation, if not Great Britain? Leo is furious that teeth from old age fell out? So completely break the jaws for a short time ...
    3. +4
      24 November 2015 15: 51
      Quote: oleg-gr
      The Russian Federation pursues its foreign policy. This alone makes it an aggressor towards the West and NATO. How good it was at the time of the manual Tagged and Drunk.
      Russia's behavior continues to be difficult to predict

      I wish the West was not good at that time. The policy was predictable, what they say from Washington, then the Alkash will sign it. But Humpbacked! ... Even Thatcher (the earth is glassy to her!) Somehow noticed that NATO still has no time to offer, and Hunchback already does.

      Hence the moral the less predictable our policy is for the West, the better for Russia. Like the flight of "Caliber" ...

      By the way, about predictability. They would be silent about Russia - let them look at Kuev. At least we ourselves understand what we are doing, and in Ukraine, the left leg goes in one direction, the right leg in the other, and the head thinks that together they go to the third. Poroshenko in the evening does not know that in the morning he will hit a hangover head ...
    4. +2
      24 November 2015 16: 19
      "However, more and more often, our reaction is checked with the help of aircraft, including Russian" outlet to the ocean, it's time to move it closer to the north.
  2. +5
    24 November 2015 15: 26
    but what about you, s..mi, differently? paranoid fool
  3. +7
    24 November 2015 15: 28
    «Russia's behavior continues to be difficult to predict, and although this is highly unlikely, we cannot rule out the possibility that it may be tempted to display aggression towards NATO countries. ”
    And is this the text of a defense strategy? The temptation to feel ... Natural fiction.
    P.S. , .... t (Lavrov (s)
  4. +1
    24 November 2015 15: 28
    It hints at the Eastern European small fry that it is time for them to give up.
  5. +7
    24 November 2015 15: 28
    So if you want peace, prepare for war. There is no other way with our "partners".
  6. +9
    24 November 2015 15: 29
    Well, how to understand this ???
    Our planes fly in international airspace - aggressively flapping wings?
    Well, ehh!
    1. +5
      24 November 2015 15: 47
      Quote: Alexnder
      Our planes fly in international airspace - aggressively flapping wings?

      tease and name-calling bully tongue
  7. Darkoff
    +8
    24 November 2015 15: 29
    We are actively exhibiting I.D.O.T.A.M.I. They warned the pilots 10 times, but they did not listen (???), then the Russian Federation can attack a military bloc whose budget is ten times higher than its own!
    Already infuriates this lies hypocrisy! No.
    1. +7
      24 November 2015 15: 44
      Shooters tomorrow will capture the Baltic states and say Putin leaked?
      1. +3
        24 November 2015 15: 49
        Plan B did not fall
  8. +5
    24 November 2015 15: 31
    Psychological treatment of the western citizen and politicians to increase the military budgets of NATO countries.
  9. +6
    24 November 2015 15: 31
    I would say so, if someone complains that Russia is unpredictable in its actions, then this does not say anything. If the country's policy is predictable, then this country is controlled by someone. And the vassal countries, our independence in politics and actions is simply enraging. Therefore, they let us down all the dogs. We are both sekoy and aggressor we and redneck. All the worst in one bottle. They so show their envy to us. Well, plainly envious
  10. +2
    24 November 2015 15: 31
    "... manifestations of aggression against NATO countries ..."
    It seems to me that the "song" is about Turkey ?! He's also a member of ... NATO
  11. +5
    24 November 2015 15: 32
    does not exclude the aggressive intentions of the Russian Federation with regard to NATO ... And NATO in the person of Turkey is knocking down our plane ... They already have aggressive actions. And we have all hypothetical intentions ...
  12. +3
    24 November 2015 15: 33
    So already the aggressors of the damned attacked Turkey! They do not want to annex otherwise. It's time to defend yourself. Include all the propaganda democratic press and go to victory. The Turks are in front as a sacrificial ram (all the same, there are no brains), the UK is starting up behind.
  13. +3
    24 November 2015 15: 33
    It would be surprising if Russia behaved differently. Although ... 90s. The country is now eliminating the consequences of Gorbachev and Yeltsin. If liberals hadn’t interfered yet.
  14. +9
    24 November 2015 15: 35
    Do you know whose dry land the Georgians had in 2008? Turkish. Himself ate this trophy taken in Gori.
  15. +2
    24 November 2015 15: 36
    Here is the reason why our plane was shot down.
  16. Darkoff
    +3
    24 November 2015 15: 36
    Deputy Speaker of the State Duma from the faction "Fair Russia" Nikolai Levichev asks the head of the Federal Air Transport Agency to consider the possibility of terminating air traffic between Russia and Turkey.
  17. +9
    24 November 2015 15: 40
    I don’t know what about the Russian aggression against NATO, but one of the NATO members has just committed an undisguised act of aggression against Russia.
  18. +5
    24 November 2015 15: 42
    Kurds, Kurds, Kurds .... How many weapons you will have! Erdogan follows the path of Hussein (to the question of the Kurds) right in the loop, rejected the hand of Russia, now the question of the very existence of Turkey as a state stands! Is it really difficult to understand who serves you sooner or later surrenders to them or throws out as unnecessary!
  19. 0
    24 November 2015 15: 43
    Quote: Manager
    Here is the reason why our plane was shot down.


    Yes, it is clear why. Erdogan is not a pity in case "... but we cannot rule out that she may feel the temptation to show aggression towards NATO countries."
    Let's see how our people will answer, they will not answer, it is clear that "temptations" will turn into a devil-may-care.
  20. +2
    24 November 2015 15: 44
    She also increased the number of military exercises and strengthened rhetoric, threatening to deploy elements of nuclear forces in Kaliningrad and Crimea.

    How many exercises has NATO conducted in the Baltics, Poland, Romania this year? Is this not an aggressive NATO policy? Is NATO non-proliferation to the east observed? Would shut up better and sit on their "unsinkable cruiser"

    Our investments in marine reconnaissance aircraft will help to significantly improve our ability to ensure the safety of our waters. ”

    A familiar song to the tune: "Give me money for a rewrite!"
  21. +2
    24 November 2015 15: 44
    Well, yes, yes, the most modest and peaceful country declares ......
  22. +3
    24 November 2015 15: 44
    A guy from Stakhanov works for us (Lugansk), so he immediately gave a really awesome idea! It is necessary to immediately mobilize Russian tourists in Turland! And join her to Russia!
  23. 0
    24 November 2015 15: 46
    Sleep well "partners" are our zapadenskie until we raise the birth rate to the level we need, we will tolerate your spitting at Us, well, after the hour "H" you mlyn will rag ... start trembling now ... we will remember everything for you , we will provide the invoice against signature. Sssttrrraaashno? ...
  24. +4
    24 November 2015 15: 46
    They were told long ago: "You will live under water." And they are tempted again.
  25. -6
    24 November 2015 15: 51
    Deployment from 300 at the borders. I wonder what Putin will say, now his fate depends
    1. +2
      24 November 2015 16: 28
      his fate does not depend on Turkey. We are not in Russia just to wave a saber at NATO, a cut richer than us once in 30-50.
      We’ll do everything smarter, don’t worry. You are in the EU now exactly PPC. I have no idea how. but kirdyk to you. get ready. Russia is coming.
  26. +2
    24 November 2015 15: 55
    Well, Britain is definitely not in danger. What to do there on this scorched earth.
  27. +2
    24 November 2015 15: 57
    The reason for this is cheap Egil oil, on which we hit the Economy and nothing personal ...
  28. +2
    24 November 2015 16: 00
    Smoked said that we are the threat number 2?
    Stated.

    What NATA does not get used to?

    "Britain does not rule out ...". And why? Are they not exceptional enough?
  29. +4
    24 November 2015 16: 01
    Anglo-Saxons and NATO are in the end - where are their bases (NATO)? is everything around Russia, and are we still threatening it?
  30. +3
    24 November 2015 16: 02
    Britain does not rule out
    Yes, there is already no Britain! .. Last time I ask: who wiped the remote? ..
  31. +3
    24 November 2015 16: 14
    “Russia's behavior continues to be hard-to-predict, and although this is highly unlikely, we cannot rule out that it may feel tempted to show aggression towards NATO countries,” the text says.
    What do you taste, Britons?
  32. +6
    24 November 2015 16: 22
    Yes, guys, we live in interesting times.
    The thing is this: the NATO people have a combined GDP of 50 trillion, and we only have two ... In all cases, they are stronger. but the NATO earplugs forgot that NONE of the empire survived butting with Russia.
    There was the Ottoman Empire - now just Turkey
    There was the Great Rnch Commonwealth - now just Potsha.
    There was the Great Karl 12, who bent the whole bugger out of cancer. Now - eternally neutral Sweden.
    there was Napoleon with Hitler. The Great English Empire, which was spoiling us, was eternal from 1/3 of the territories of the Planet - nowadays a miserable island of "United Kingdom" ...
    Yes, you are stronger than us. But you kirdyk. I don’t know how, but my grandfathers also never knew how, but they believed in Victory.
    Hang yourself. Russia is coming
    1. +1
      24 November 2015 19: 13
      Quote: Magadan
      NATO members have a combined GDP of 50 trillion, and we have only two ...

      Well, if there is a WAR (from "to the fullest"), then all this, including the industrial potential, will no longer be of great importance. It is only important how many weapons will survive and in whose hands they will be. And, of course, the most important thing is people. Their willingness to fight and go to the end. And in the last component, our "partners" will obviously lose.
  33. cap
    +1
    24 November 2015 16: 59
    English tale many years later.
    "And Ivan waved his right hand, the swans flew, waved his left hand at the poplar grove in Times Square, and all around the acacias bloomed ... such grace descended ..."
    "And then ...? Then I'll tell you tomorrow. Now to sleep. We extinguish the candles."
  34. +1
    24 November 2015 17: 03
    Erdogan, - the black-jackal jackal rode to Brussels for fear stsukaaa!?!
  35. +1
    24 November 2015 17: 05
    Most of all it warmed the soul that "Russia's behavior continues to be difficult to predict."
  36. 0
    24 November 2015 17: 45
    Our investments in marine reconnaissance aircraft will help to significantly improve our ability to ensure the safety of our waters. ”
    Give me the money !!!
  37. hartlend
    0
    24 November 2015 17: 51
    Quote: Bombardier
    According to Turkish media reports, the S-400, which is not officially there, joined in Syria (maybe an analogue on ships?)

    Quote: Bombardier
    Specifically English heading: A Turkish jet just obtained an appointment with Russian S-400 as a live target.

    Quote: Bombardier
    There is no more detailed information yet,

    Reliable information.
  38. +1
    24 November 2015 17: 54
    Britain does not rule out? Is it today when our plane was shot down? Britain speaks out. Today in Putin’s speech I heard notes of fatigue and unwillingness to talk at all. The West will silence Russia with its injections, stop speaking with words, then the guns will speak.
  39. +1
    24 November 2015 19: 19
    What kind of babble - the whole flow of militants goes back and forth through Turkey - the whole world knows - Turkey is the aggressor all - history shows - the Anglo-Saxons have always been for Turks against Russia
  40. -1
    24 November 2015 20: 00
    Bismarck said that he was not interested in intentions, but in opportunities.
    The attack of the Russian Federation on NATO will mean mutual destruction. Or surrender.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"