Military Review
Sign in Sign up

Russia began to transfer to Iran the ZRS C-300

53
Russia has begun the process of transferring the C-300 anti-aircraft systems to Iran as part of a recently signed contract, said on Monday Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to the Iranian ambassador in Moscow, Mehdi Sanai.




Earlier, the head of the Iranian military department, Hossein Dehgan, said that he expects to supply the complexes by the end of this year.

The newspaper notes that the message from the ambassador arrived on the day when Vladimir Putin was in Iran with a one-day visit.

Recall, the contract for the supply of Tehran ZRS C-300 was signed in 2007 g, but was not executed by the Russian side because of the restrictions imposed by the UN Security Council on the sale of offensive weapons to Iran (although C-300 weapons is not). After achieving progress in the negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program, the ban on the supply of complexes to Iran was lifted. 9 November Rostec announced that a new agreement was signed with Tehran, according to which modernized C-300 will be transferred to the Islamic Republic.
Photos used:
Tatyana Andreeva / RG
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. venaya
    venaya 24 November 2015 10: 13 New
    28
    This is to be expected, better late than never. We cannot leave an ally so important to us at the moment without air defense.
    1. volot-voin
      volot-voin 24 November 2015 10: 15 New
      16
      Quote: venaya
      This was to be expected, better late than never.

      Finally, they decided to close the skies for NATO aviation. Also help a potential ally.
    2. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 24 November 2015 10: 18 New
      -2
      .... This is to be expected, better late than never ....

      .... Everything is fine, but explain to me the air defense experts - why didn’t the Iranians "Antei" ???? ..... Cling to the S-300 .... As for me, it is better for them highly mobile "Anteys" than stationary S-300 ....
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 24 November 2015 10: 34 New
        +2
        aleks 62 next RU Today, 10:18 ↑ New
        .... This is to be expected, better late than never ....

        .... Everything is fine, but explain to me the experts in air defense - why did not the Iranians "Antei" arrange ???? ...
        it is possible, for example, that the complex is quite bulky, with a large number of radars, PUs of various types and on a caterpillar base ...
      2. Don
        Don 24 November 2015 11: 14 New
        +1
        Quote: aleks 62 next
        .... Everything is fine, but explain to me the air defense experts - why didn’t the Iranians "Antei" ???? ..... Cling to the S-300 .... As for me, it is better for them highly mobile "Anteys" than stationary S-300 ....

        1) S-300 is not stationary.
        2) If you put the S-300PMU2, then by TTX I do not see a difference with Antei.
        3) Antei is primarily intended for the direct cover of troops located close to the enemy
    3. 79807420129
      79807420129 24 November 2015 10: 26 New
      16
      Yes, a long time ago the contract was signed, only then Medved once again caved in under the Western “partners” and, as always, dealt a blow to our reputation, now at least we will deliver to the allies what they promised.
      1. valokordin
        valokordin 24 November 2015 10: 39 New
        +1
        Quote: 79807420129
        Yes, a long time ago the contract was signed, only then Medved once again caved in under the Western “partners” and, as always, dealt a blow to our reputation, now at least we will deliver to the allies what they promised.

        It’s not necessary to once again blame Ayfonchik, as well as Feldmebel, they always strictly obeyed the order. All these refusals arose as a result of diplomatic circumstances. And diplomacy is thinner than a mosquito jet
        1. ksan
          ksan 24 November 2015 11: 46 New
          +1
          It’s not necessary to once again blame Ayfonchik, as well as Feldmebel, they always accurately carried out the order
          Ifon, as you put it, regarding the “freezing” of the contract, it was said that it was his decision to “find compromises with American friends on the Iranian nuclear program.” And the noodles about the “Tandem” have not stood up to any criticism for a long time, rather it’s such a “screen” for the ostentatious unity of the two strongest “groups” in the Kremlin and the White House. bully
    4. Aroma77
      Aroma77 24 November 2015 10: 51 New
      0
      Quote: Strezhevchanin
      Complexes are a drop, a lot of other things were signed, contracts. We are waiting for a piggy screech from behind a puddle!

      Meanwhile, in social networks they are already writing about a downed military plane in Syria. It is not clear whose he himself fell or was shot down.
    5. Tor5
      Tor5 24 November 2015 11: 10 New
      0
      A very reasonable (finally!) Solution. Iran is our historical ally.
    6. Tor5
      Tor5 24 November 2015 11: 10 New
      0
      A very reasonable (finally!) Solution. Iran is our historical ally.
      1. saruman
        saruman 24 November 2015 11: 29 New
        +4
        Iran (Persia) - has never been our ally, and will not be an ally. Once the Persians and I tried to make friends, but it ended badly. We need good neighborly and business relations with Iran, it will not work to be friends.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    7. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 24 November 2015 13: 12 New
      0
      In one step, they cooled the fervor of Turkey, and Israel and Saudi Arabia.
  2. veksha50
    veksha50 24 November 2015 10: 15 New
    12
    It was high time to fulfill our obligations ...

    Until now, to be honest, I am ashamed of how we "threw" Iran with these complexes ...

    It’s strange, I’m ashamed of the country, but I don’t have any water for DAM ... But his work is ...
    1. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 24 November 2015 12: 13 New
      +2
      Quote: veksha50
      Strange, I am ashamed of the country, and the waters Dameu - no ... But his work is ...

      I just wrote the day before yesterday
      Nano-President Vedmedev and about Taburetkin said that "he has no complaints about the activities of Serdyukov as Minister of Defense" ...


      In general, of course, we didn’t worry about that - Yeltsin, with his Gaidars and Chubais survived - nothing, and we will survive the nano-President ... I’m much more worried about what everyone faces every day in his "activity". Time Zones. I got it, the infection, the dawn in the summer at 2.30 night .... A little, of course, they repaired - but not much, not until the end ....

      They planted a "stool to guard, so as not to be stolen" - so sit quietly and do not touch anything, play an iPhone so as not to break anything by stupidity. No, damn it, the hunt with crooked handles grab onto something important and steer ....
    2. Yuyuka
      Yuyuka 24 November 2015 12: 22 New
      +2
      Until now, to be honest, I am ashamed of how we "threw" Iran with these complexes ...


      Duck did not throw the same! Although there is little pleasant, in essence, Iran has won only - the sanctions have been lifted, and as a clue “about aggression” could create additional problems, and the complexes will get upgraded. Sometimes it’s better to take a break, create a little "hype", and now, having also demonstrated the strength of Russian weapons, let us make it clear, including to Iran, that we are for good-neighborly and trusting relations. Always than we can - we will help hi
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 24 November 2015 15: 26 New
        0
        Quote: Yuyuka
        Always than we can - we will help



        I understand your comment: Better late than never ...

        PS But the witch still - a block of wood and a pest !!!
  3. horoh
    horoh 24 November 2015 10: 15 New
    +9
    We are waiting for the screech of the State Department mongrel !!
  4. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 24 November 2015 10: 15 New
    +4
    Our direct rush to Iran is very strong. Only the United States lifted the sanctions as they broke it off in the quarry. Contracts are everywhere with them ... agriculture ... defense ... energy ... trade

    But the sheep did not understand immediately they set a minus) classic idiocy. The minus for the fact that he noted the increased intensity))
    1. 0255
      0255 24 November 2015 10: 19 New
      +5
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      Our direct rush to Iran is very strong. Only the United States lifted the sanctions as they broke it off in the quarry. Contracts are everywhere with them ... agriculture ... defense ... energy ... trade
      la ...

      Why do not you like cooperation with Iran?
      1. AdekvatNICK
        AdekvatNICK 24 November 2015 10: 24 New
        +2
        on the contrary, I note the intensity. Here, where I wrote that I do not like? now show? are you really bad just to blurt out, but the brain and optic nerve do not work.
      2. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 24 November 2015 10: 51 New
        +2
        Quote: 0255
        Our direct rush to Iran is very strong. Only the United States lifted the sanctions as they broke it off in the quarry. Contracts are everywhere with them ... agriculture ... defense ... energy ... trade
        la ...
        Why do not you like cooperation with Iran?

        He simply hints that it’s not just that all these accelerated movements of ours are outlining serious events in the Middle East, in connection with the loss of initiative by the “right side” of mankind.
    2. avt
      avt 24 November 2015 10: 43 New
      +5
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      .Only the United States lifted the sanctions as they broke it off in the quarry. Contracts are everywhere with them ... agriculture ... defense ... energy ... trade

      So the market opened not sour. Russia will not have time - those who impose sanctions will take over. Business - nothing personal. We’ll slowly harness it! We ought to stake out, promising joint production, the civil aviation market - the fleet must be completely renewed there, and Iran is not China - they themselves will definitely not do anything now, they can’t just buy ready-made.
    3. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 24 November 2015 10: 45 New
      +3
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      But the sheep did not understand immediately they set a minus) classic idiocy. The minus for the fact that he noted the increased intensity))

      Do you still pay attention to the cons? In vain. It’s fun to watch how people have fun and amuse their vanity without delving into the meaning of what is written.
  5. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 24 November 2015 10: 16 New
    +6
    Complexes are a drop, a lot of other things were signed, contracts. We are waiting for a piggy screech from behind a puddle!
    1. DMoroz
      DMoroz 24 November 2015 10: 35 New
      0
      Namely, the hostages will now try to justify the creation of a missile defense system in Europe before their taxpayers, citing this, including the supply of weapons from Russia. Their people are not particularly versed in our armament and do everything, it is a priori offensive for them ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. ksan
      ksan 24 November 2015 11: 51 New
      0
      Their work is such a puddle. Squeal for any reason, especially on the "Axis of Evil" bully
  6. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 24 November 2015 10: 16 New
    +3
    That's right, there’s nothing to quarrel with Iran! And so few allies left.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Gloomy Hedgehog
      Gloomy Hedgehog 24 November 2015 10: 39 New
      +1
      Allies then, as a rule, betray, and the army is the best ally. Therefore, we do not need allies, let them remain partners.
  7. X
    X Y Z 24 November 2015 10: 19 New
    +6
    Recall that the contract for the supply of S-300 air defense systems to Tehran was signed back in 2007, but was not executed by the Russian side due to restrictions imposed by the UN Security Council on the sale of offensive weapons to Iran (although the S-300 is not such a weapon).


    That's it! We cut the Oka, or the S-300, but we didn’t have to do it. Zeal is not reasonable, but to the delight of the Western "partners." But was it worth putting right after the termination of the Mistral contract?
  8. sledge
    sledge 24 November 2015 10: 21 New
    0
    Then pendosy with geyropoy go broke. Again, toughening sanctions will scare .....
  9. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 24 November 2015 10: 21 New
    +1
    From this moment it can be said that the Anglo-Saxon creeps towards Iran have ended! Now there will be only one cheap chatter from the opera we will do if we want, but no one will even lift a finger!
  10. Victor62ru
    Victor62ru 24 November 2015 10: 22 New
    +2
    Only the United States lifted the sanctions as they broke it off in the quarry.


    So after all, if not we, then other comers will come running. So everything is correct.
    1. AdekvatNICK
      AdekvatNICK 24 November 2015 10: 36 New
      +1
      Undoubtedly. I only for.
  11. HollyGremlin
    HollyGremlin 24 November 2015 10: 23 New
    +2
    Sometimes it seems that there is an unwritten rule in world politics: “Throw a conscientious companion”
    We paid for the Mistals - they threw us.
    Iran paid for the C300 - we threw it, but now it seems that we have agreed.
    Ukraine sat on gas transit - threw it.
  12. Kradi
    Kradi 24 November 2015 10: 25 New
    +1
    All is correct. Now fulfill the contract with Iran. Then the bearded from Syria and Iraq are forced out to their sponsors. Further close the sky of Syria and Iraq. Well, after being friends together against the hostages with their hangers-on
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 24 November 2015 10: 57 New
      +1
      Quote: KraDI
      Then the bearded from Syria and Iraq to force out to their sponsors

      There is also Afghanistan, Yemen, etc. ... I think the Middle East will have to be cleaned up. Regarding supplies to Iraq, yes, yes, today it is the most important ally at that theater of operations, and therefore it is necessary to deliver air defense systems (all the more so they promised)
  13. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 24 November 2015 10: 28 New
    +2
    Quote: Strezhevchanin
    We are waiting for a piggy screech from behind a puddle!

    And not only because of the puddle, there’s also closer, to whom there is news, like a sickle for me .., oh, well, in short, everyone understood what and about whom, I won’t specify, otherwise they’ll run up and shut up the minuses to death lol wink laughing
    1. Private27
      Private27 24 November 2015 11: 42 New
      +1
      The sons of Israel.
    2. ksan
      ksan 24 November 2015 11: 57 New
      +1
      to whom is the news, like a sickle for me .., oh, well, in short, everyone understood what and about whom, I won’t clarify, otherwise they’ll run in and shut up minuses to death lol
      They don’t shut up; the S-300 doesn’t reach them wink They became alarmed when the Syrian S-300s were about to give, so "alarmed" that WE and "caved in" like with Iran. hi
  14. Hiw
    Hiw 24 November 2015 10: 28 New
    0
    dark days are coming for star-stripes, in the future it is necessary to put these complexes into Syria, although I think that our bases there will be permanent with a s-400 abundance. Friendship with the countries of the Middle East should be started, there is nothing for the Yanks to do here, this is not their hemisphere, and indeed, it is not their land
  15. COBA
    COBA 24 November 2015 10: 30 New
    +1
    If iPhone Badmintonitch hadn’t been so cautious in reprimanding Obama, Iran would have received the S-300 back in 2010. But this is a minor dirty trick compared with the surrender of Gaddafi to the “neo-Crusader jackals,” as a result, Syria, Ukraine and further along the chain followed.
    1. ksan
      ksan 24 November 2015 12: 11 New
      +1
      KOBA SU Today, 10:30 am New
      If iPhone Badmintonitch hadn’t been so cautious in reprimanding Obama, Iran would have received the S-300 back in 2010. But this is a minor dirty trick compared with the surrender of Gaddafi to the “neo-Crusader jackals,” as a result, Syria, Ukraine and further along the chain followed.
      This is the favorite pastime of our Liberasts - to grovel in the West. They miserable still believe that they will be accepted there for theirs, transferred from the 3rd grade to the 1st and accepted into a friendly cock family. Why try to build a Great Power, it’s hard, it’s better to bend over, “take a pose” then wash yourself and have fun on the Cote d'Azur with stolen money. hi
  16. V.ic
    V.ic 24 November 2015 10: 32 New
    +1
    The contract for the supply of Tehran SAM S-300 was signed back in 2007, however was not executed by the Russian side due to restrictions imposed by the UN Security Council on the sale of offensive weapons to Iran (although the S-300 is not such a weapon).

    The analogy with the Mistrals is visible.
  17. Seneca
    Seneca 24 November 2015 10: 36 New
    0
    We throw firewood ... so that it flares up as much as possible wink And then you are going to triple the oil production.) Israel and the Arabs triple them .. heh.
  18. kasperian_1
    kasperian_1 24 November 2015 10: 39 New
    0
    Waited for the same
  19. aszzz888
    aszzz888 24 November 2015 10: 46 New
    +2
    We will finish off the mericatos together. And the fact that the modernized, I think the Iranians will not be offended. smile
  20. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 24 November 2015 10: 55 New
    0
    Now for an adult. And it was some kind of political game of giveaways in favor of the Americans and probably in the “hope” that we should simply be praised in the West. And concessions to the West (especially the United States) do not lead to good. Therefore, today for all the shattering before them with a full spoon we slurp sanctions and streams of unjustified accusations with the addition of lies and dirt.
  21. sa-ag
    sa-ag 24 November 2015 11: 00 New
    0
    Iran is an additional market for the West, it seems that sanctions were lifted from it in order to master the frozen Iranian assets, since not everything is so fast with Europe
  22. mamont5
    mamont5 24 November 2015 11: 00 New
    +1
    Quote: venaya
    This is to be expected, better late than never. We cannot leave an ally so important to us at the moment without air defense.

    Exactly. It is high time. Debts must be repaid. No need to take an example from the USA and their jackals.
  23. prishelec
    prishelec 24 November 2015 11: 01 New
    0
    Well, finally, wait, it happened ... fellow good
  24. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 24 November 2015 11: 08 New
    -1
    Quote: Strezhevchanin
    We are waiting for a piggy screech from behind a puddle!


    It is necessary to wait not for a pig's squeal, but for Israeli bombers, who will fly and bomb mercilessly, until the complexes are deployed and stand on a full combat duty. And now you need to be prepared for this fully armed and then all will be happy. Except Israel.
  25. Grosser
    Grosser 24 November 2015 11: 18 New
    0
    The newsletter is so-so ... Fulfillment of the agreements is a long-negotiated holy and there is nothing supernatural in it. And the fact that because of political collisions it was not possible to fulfill them = well, the life is so varied and complicated.
  26. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 24 November 2015 11: 19 New
    +1
    "Media: Turkish air force shot down by an unknown fighter

    Original news RT in Russian:
    https://russian.rt.com/article/132234
  27. Wolka
    Wolka 24 November 2015 11: 38 New
    0
    and Vaska listens and eats, this is to himself ...
  28. Han Solo
    Han Solo 24 November 2015 12: 04 New
    +1
    It remains to open military bases in Iran. One at the port. The second on land! wink
  29. Eugene-Eugene
    Eugene-Eugene 24 November 2015 12: 42 New
    +2
    I remember that quite recently the sons of Israel urged in this forum the impossibility of supplying C-300 to Iran.
  30. iouris
    iouris 24 November 2015 13: 48 New
    0
    There is nothing impossible in politics. But now a new problem has arisen: what to do with Turkey, which is NATO, which is the United States?
  31. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 24 November 2015 17: 07 New
    -2
    These complexes were built for the transfer of Syria, now due to leadership errors they have to be given to Iran, Syria was left with nothing. This is also a mistake, because our planes in Syria were left without a powerful air defense, what we have seen today. So cowardice and incompetence at the very top pulls one mistake after another, the consequences are always the same. Those who are guilty receive orders "for merit", those who are not guilty die.