Military Review

Tov. Stalin in the language 40-x talks about modern "allies" in the fight against terrorism

67
The world media (and Russian ones too) are trying to guess under what conditions the very antiterrorist coalition will be knocked together (if at all), the need for which Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke out from the rostrum of the UN anniversary general assembly. As you know, initially the very idea that Russia could hit the teeth of a variety of terrorist groups hard using aviation component and launches of cruise missiles from the Caspian Sea, in the West (and not only) seemed delusional. But as soon as the airborne group of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria began to level the infrastructure of militants with the earth, to smoke them from holes and cracks, to destroy not only terrorist military equipment, but also the channels for obtaining basic financing (oil refining facilities), Western friends “buzzed”.


Now the conversation is not going on the wave of statements that “we will not create any coalition with Russia”, “no contacts with Moscow on Syria are impossible by definition”. The conversation turns into the plane, if I may say so, of the need to create at least a contactless informal coalition (interaction), when different forces (Russia and the West) have their own “front of work”, and everyone on their front can achieve some success.

That is, it seems that the coalition is inevitable, the opening of a real “second front” too, but again in what format the “final” process will take place, because each of its participants is trying to pursue their geopolitical interests. More difficult for those who themselves sponsored the creation of a terrorist infrastructure for the change of power in Syria.

On this subject, you can think for a long time, but would it not be a more sensible thing to turn to storiesand specifically to how the process of creating a coalition with the allies was described at one time by a person who knew firsthand how much time and nerves the process of negotiating the formation of a viable coalition against a common enemy could take away. We are talking about a person whose works and recordings of speeches in modern conditions are many times more difficult to find than publications of "non-living free" historians about him. Speech about Stalin. With all the ambiguity of this figure, his statements can hardly be left unnoticed. And without that, they had been trying to leave them for too long under a layer of ash and liberal garbage.

After reviewing the records of Stalin's speeches, you can follow the important detail. If, a month after 3-4, since the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR (at least publicly) spoke about the entry of the allies from the United States and Britain into the war, as if about to happen (from minute to minute) and should save the USSR, over time, the thoughts of IV Stalin on this issue changed in the direction of a clear increase in the percentage of skepticism and the level of understanding that the allies, as they say, are broad only in words.

November 1941:

What did the fascist German strategists count on, arguing that they would finish the Soviet Union in two months and reach the Urals in this short time? First of all, they hoped that they seriously hoped to create a universal coalition against the USSR, to involve Great Britain and the United States in this coalition, having previously intimidated the ruling circles of these countries with the specter of revolution, and completely isolate thus our country from other powers. The Germans knew that their game politics at odds between the classes of individual states and between these states and the Soviet country has already yielded results in France, the rulers of which, giving themselves intimidate the ghost of the revolutionWith a fright, they put their homeland under Hitler’s feet, refusing to resist. The fascist German strategists thought the same would happen to the UK and the USA.

The notorious Hess was, in fact, sent to England by the German fascists in order to convince the British politicians to join the general campaign against the USSR. But the Germans miscalculated. Great Britain and the United States, in spite of Hess’s efforts, not only did not join the German fascist invaders' campaign against the USSR, but, on the contrary, found themselves in the same camp with the USSR against Nazi Germany. The USSR not only did not turn out to be isolated, but, on the contrary, acquired new allies in the person of Great Britain, the United States and other countries occupied by the Germans. It turned out that the German policy of the game, in contradiction and in intimidation by the ghost of the revolution, had exhausted itself and was no longer suitable for the new situation. And not only is it no good, but it is still fraught with great dangers for the German invaders, for it leads in the new conditions of the war to directly opposite results.


Tov. Stalin in the language 40-x talks about modern "allies" in the fight against terrorism


And the words are some acquaintances ... Isolation ... Bullying by the ghost of the revolution ... Almost three quarters of a century has passed, and our "friends" (if by this word we mean the collective West, led by different representatives of "unique nations" at different times,) even change the record were not going to. In 40, they “isolated” the USSR, at the same time they attempted (successful or less successful) to change the powers of certain countries to the regimes pleasing themselves in order to serve their geopolitical interests. And the main tool remained the same: contradictions, attempts to split.

JVStalin from the speech “The Causes of Temporary Failures of Our Army”:

One of the reasons for the failure of the Red Army is the lack of a second front in Europe against the German fascist troops. The fact is that at present there are no armies of Great Britain or the United States of America on the European continent that would wage war against the German fascist troops, which is why the Germans do not have to crush their forces and wage war on two fronts, in the west and in the east. Well, this circumstance leads to the fact that the Germans, considering their rear in the west secured, have the opportunity to move all their troops and the troops of their allies in Europe against our country. The setting is now such that our country wages a war of liberation alone, without any military assistance, against the combined forces of the Germans, Finns, Romanians, Italians, Hungarians. (...) There is no doubt that the absence of a second front in Europe against the Germans greatly facilitates the position of the German army. But there can be no doubt that the emergence of a second front on the continent of Europe — and he, of course, should appear in the near future — will greatly facilitate the position of our army to the detriment of the German one.


A very solid illustration of the conditions under which the fight against terrorism is conducted in the Middle East. Of course, we are not talking about some strange attempt to compare the situation of the Red Army in 1941 and the Russian air group in Syria in 2015. The thing is that Russia is now forced to fight those who, in fact, can be called the single enemy of civilization, alone. All these victorious reports of the Western media about the "successes" of the American coalition look very similar to the publications of the American media about the "victories" in the war with the coalition of Hitler's 1941 sample of the year. As soon as the States announced their entry into the war, so you understand, and began to "win one brilliant victory after another." Like, why the second front ... We are better because of the "puddle" or in small groups where it is not as hot as, for example, near Moscow ... And if you can help, then with equipment and food, but don’t think that it is free. ..

Against the background of the statements of the modern “allies” about the readiness to fight terrorism by any means, and against the background of the reigning disorder and vacillation in the camp of the “allies” themselves, the statement of I.V. Stalin (the end of 1941) that against the background of the spread of Hitlerism in Europe, it itself is formed by fragility and fragility.

Stalin (from the fragment of the speech "The defeat of the German imperialists and their army is inevitable"):

There are three main factors, whose strength is growing day by day and which should lead in the near future to the inevitable defeat of Hitler's predatory imperialism.

This is, firstly, the fragility of the European rear of imperialist Germany, the fragility of the "new order" in Europe. The German invaders have enslaved the peoples of the European continent from France to the Soviet Baltic, from Norway, Denmark, Belgium, Holland and Soviet Belorussia to the Balkans and Soviet Ukraine, deprived them of elementary democratic freedoms, deprived of their right to control their own destinythey took away their bread, meat, raw materials, turned them into their slaves, they crucified the Poles, the Czechs, the Serbs on the cross, and decided that, having achieved domination in Europe, they could now build Germany’s world domination on this basis. They call it “the new order in Europe”. But what is this "basis", what is this "new order"? Only Hitler's narcissistic fools do not see that the "new order" in Europe and the notorious "basis" of this order is a volcano, ready to explode at any moment and bury the German imperialist house of cards (...).


And if today the word “Germany” is still replaced with the USA ... The speech in this context looks very modern! Moreover, we should not forget that in the 1930s, the Hitlerite party, which, as it now turns out, was sympathized even by the leading monarchist dynasties of Europe, was not without foreign financing. On Hitler did about the same rate that today do on international terrorism. And then, and now, the fascist / terrorist puppeteers believe (believe) that they will forever fulfill their will and never allow themselves to strike at the puppeteers themselves.

Stalin in the same speech:
Who can doubt that the USSR, Great Britain and the United States will give full support to the peoples of Europe in their liberation struggle against Hitler’s tyranny?


However, until the moment when Britain and the United States suddenly decided to "support the peoples of Europe", one important detail was needed: the Red Army defeated the Nazi armies in the USSR and its western borders crossed to 1944.

As it can be seen, even now Western “friends” are waiting for an answer to the question: by what trajectory will events in the same Syria develop, and is it necessary in this connection to urgently finish off their offspring in the form of IS, all kinds of “Al Nusr” and other assorted terrorist gatherings so that Russia won the victory.

From correspondence (in letters) conversations of the journalist Associated Press Cassidy c JVStalin about the "possible opening of the second front" (interview sample 1942 of the year):

Cassidy:
What place in the Soviet assessment of the current situation does the possibility of a second front occupy?


Stalin:
Very important - one might say - paramount place
.

Cassidy:
How effective is the help of the Allies to the Soviet Union, and what could be done to expand and improve this assistance?


Stalin:
In comparison with the assistance that the Soviet Union provides to the allies, delaying the main forces of the German fascist forces, the assistance of the allies to the Soviet Union is still ineffective. To expand and improve this assistance, only one thing is needed: the Allies fulfill their obligations in a full and timely manner.


Cassidy:
What else is the Soviet ability to resist?


Stalin:
I think that the Soviet ability to resist German robbers is no less by its strength, if not higher, the ability of fascist Germany or some other aggressive power to secure world domination.


When changing certain terms - it sounds supermodern ... Supermodern, like a fragment of Stalin's speech from November 1942 of the year on the occasion of the 25 anniversary of the revolution:

People often ask: will there be a second front in Europe? Yes, it will, sooner or later, but it will. And it will be not only because we need it, but, above all, because he is no less needed by our alliesthan us Our allies cannot fail to understand that after France failed, the absence of a second front against fascist Germany can end badly for all freedom-loving countries, including the allies themselves.


One hundred to one that our modern "allies" ignore the materials for the authorship of Comrade Stalin. Well, in vain ... It is in vain ... It would not hurt to familiarize oneself in order not to step on the previous rake in attempts to incite the terrorist fodder on other states, naively believing that the fishery will not jump off the leash.
Author:
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. parusnik
    parusnik 24 November 2015 06: 36 New
    +7
    It would not hurt to get acquainted, so as not to step on the previous rake in attempts to set terrorist fosterlings on other states, naively believing that lathers would not slip off the leash...what for? They wrote their own story, and live on it .. But the real story will teach the managers ...
    1. 79807420129
      79807420129 24 November 2015 07: 39 New
      +9
      Quote: inkass_98
      And now, the anniversary of the meeting in Tehran-43, familiarization with its results would also be useful to some gentlemen in the West, if they had not been taught at school.

      Now is the anniversary of the Yalta and Potsdam conferences, which determined the fate of the world for 50 years, which the Americans trampled.
      1. smershxnumx
        smershxnumx 24 November 2015 09: 19 New
        0
        Sobssno, history develops in a spiral .... hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. CALL.
        CALL. 24 November 2015 12: 02 New
        10
        We are talking about a man whose writings and recordings of speeches in modern conditions are many times more difficult to find than the publication of "non-worthy free" historians about him. It's about Stalin.

        The greatest victories of the USSR and the Soviet people, under the leadership of Stalin, then recognized and now recognize (through gritted teeth) even his sworn enemies, which can not be said about modern "shavkoliberasts". Stalin was not a "tyrant" either in the literal or figurative sense of the word. But he was the leader of the power party (not to be confused with the "party of power", as one of the current parliamentary parties proudly calls himself), whose members were "responsible" for everything that happens in the country. We rely so far on the results of his affairs. Someone from the great said - "Stalin is so great that he would not have to be born or would not be worth dying!"
        1. Gormenghast
          Gormenghast 24 November 2015 22: 47 New
          0
          Modern liberals quite seriously argue that the Anglo-Saxons won the Second World War. In the Amer textbooks on the history of the Battle of Stalingrad, one paragraph is devoted, and, accordingly, the Amerans are proud that they "defeated Hitler"- they are so taught.
      4. Shveps
        Shveps 24 November 2015 12: 15 New
        +7
        Quote: 79807420129
        Now is the anniversary of the Yalta and Potsdam conferences, which determined the fate of the world


        "I always thought that democracy is the power of the people, but Comrade Roosevelt lucidly explained to me that democracy is the power of the American people."

        Under capitalism, there is no and cannot be the real participation of the exploited masses in governing the country, if only because under the most democratic conditions under capitalism, governments are not appointed by the people, but by the Rothschilds and Stinnes, the Rockefellers and the Morgan.
        Joseph Stalin.

        Unfortunately, Russia is no exception. With the loss of Faith, democracy came.
    2. Skif83
      Skif83 24 November 2015 08: 59 New
      12
      They may have written something for themselves, but it would be worthwhile to study Stalin's prophetic words about the post-war world order. Stalin predicted everything, and it’s not hell to turn to Vanga or, moreover, to different postradamuses.
      The genius of Stalin is precisely in his ability to think strategically for centuries to come.
      It is necessary not only to refer to it in such cases, it would be good to make the Russian "elite" study the experience of that time, only ... there are doubts that it is able to understand and appreciate what it is impossible to express in money!
      1. NordUral
        NordUral 24 November 2015 09: 42 New
        +3
        This "elite" does not even know how to handle money, if you look at the result of its activities over a quarter century.
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 24 November 2015 12: 38 New
          +3
          Quote: NordUral
          This "elite" is not able to handle money,

          A very relative statement ... this applies at what point .. steal, roll back, throw offshore - they have no equal ..
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  2. inkass_98
    inkass_98 24 November 2015 06: 51 New
    +5
    And now, the anniversary of the meeting in Tehran-43, familiarization with its results would also be useful to some gentlemen in the West, if they had not been taught at school.
  3. Volga Cossack
    Volga Cossack 24 November 2015 06: 54 New
    +9
    very timely article !!!! thank!!! I agree with the author!
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 24 November 2015 06: 57 New
    +6
    over time, the thoughts of I.V. Stalin on this subject changed towards a clear increase in the percentage of skepticism and the level of understanding that the allies, as they say, are broad only in words.


    Harry Truman, said in 1941: “If the Russians win, we must help the Germans, and if the Germans, then the Russians need help. And may they kill each other as much as possible. ”

    I believe the Anglo-Saxon policy in this vein has survived to this day ...

    So we will be smarter than them too, we must do so .... their fat and yes to them in wort.
    1. THE_SEAL
      THE_SEAL 24 November 2015 07: 43 New
      -53
      Again, the Six Stalinists gathered and baslan. Pahan remember who ruined half the country.
      1. venaya
        venaya 24 November 2015 07: 54 New
        12
        Quote: THE_SEAL
        Pahan remember who ruined half the country.

        Dear, please specify which "gender of the country" do you mean?
        This is important for determining which country is of interest to you, otherwise it is not clear who exactly you work for, because this is how you confuse others.
        1. Darkness
          Darkness 24 November 2015 08: 05 New
          12
          They have the word "Stalin" causes fear and horror. For daail of such Russoob, to the best of his ability.
      2. Bombardier
        Bombardier 24 November 2015 09: 18 New
        16
        Quote: THE_SEAL
        Again, the Six Stalinists gathered and baslan. Pahan remember who ruined half the country.



        Come on, blow to Yekaterinburg, where the Yeltsin Museum was opened yesterday - there you will make similar speeches ...
      3. valokordin
        valokordin 24 November 2015 09: 31 New
        10
        Quote: THE_SEAL
        Again, the Six Stalinists gathered and baslan. Pahan remember who ruined half the country.

        To call the sixes Stalinist, and even in thieves' jargon is the level of thinking of a gangster personality of the time of the 90s. These personalities are trying to rule in the present time, in a team with a fifth column. Iosif Vissarionovich did not finish these citizens as well as Bandera in Ukraine.
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 24 November 2015 12: 42 New
          +4
          Quote: valokordin
          To call the sixes Stalinist, and even in thieves' jargon is the level of thinking of a gangster personality of the time of the 90s. These individuals try to rule in

          Yes - this is a network inadequate classic troll confidently going to black epaulets .. wassat
      4. Mareman Vasilich
        Mareman Vasilich 24 November 2015 09: 32 New
        +2
        Correctly a citizen, that is exactly what all young unwise people think.
      5. NordUral
        NordUral 24 November 2015 09: 43 New
        +6
        Another granddaughter of the "innocently" repressed.
      6. Severomor
        Severomor 24 November 2015 10: 22 New
        +2
        Quote: THE_SEAL
        gathered and baslanate

        Oh, the raccoon went on the warpath. Not long left, banned soon))))
        And does anyone know, besides the censor, is there a special site for ragul?
      7. nemets
        nemets 24 November 2015 17: 16 New
        0
        it is a pity that you have no mosk)))
      8. gangut
        gangut 24 November 2015 19: 03 New
        +1
        This is for the "represhennoy" bay, Do not like it - do not listen!
    2. THE_SEAL
      THE_SEAL 24 November 2015 07: 43 New
      -39
      Again, the Six Stalinists gathered and baslan. Pahan remember who ruined half the country.
      1. Darkness
        Darkness 24 November 2015 08: 04 New
        +4
        Again, anti-Russophobes crawled out of their holes.
      2. Baloo_bst
        Baloo_bst 24 November 2015 08: 11 New
        18
        Ruined sex of the country - how much?
        A million, two, three. Or are you operating hundreds of millions?
        It has already been proved that under I.V. Stalin was in prison less people than now under V.V. Putin, and the population was an order of magnitude larger.
        Take an interest, if interested, in population growth figures, then and now, take an interest in how many clinics, kindergartens and other similar institutions were built.
        Have you read Solzhenitsyn?
        1. goose
          goose 24 November 2015 16: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: Baloo_bst
          Have you read Solzhenitsyn?

          And what about Solzhenitsyn? He refused, saying that his literature can only be regarded as literary works that describe private destinies with a fair share of literary fiction, and in no way can be used to describe the mores of the whole country.
        2. nemets
          nemets 24 November 2015 17: 20 New
          0
          in FSA sits even more for less dangerous crimes
      3. oracul
        oracul 24 November 2015 08: 50 New
        +4
        Human stupidity gives an idea of ​​infinity.
      4. gangut
        gangut 24 November 2015 19: 05 New
        0
        This shit again !!!
      5. Weyland
        Weyland 24 November 2015 22: 36 New
        0
        Quote: THE_SEAL
        Pahan remember who ruined half the country


        Just half the country? But what about the "billion executed by Stalin personally"? laughing
  5. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 24 November 2015 06: 57 New
    +8
    As they say, history teaches only that it does not teach anything. If we discard all the conditions and realities of today's world order, but reduce the past to a simple one, an interesting picture will be drawn - Europe (read West) ALWAYS tried to destroy us! Maybe some grudges against us are almost at the genetic level? Maybe in the past all these extra males were under us and are now taking revenge by any means ?? Here are just a drive invented by Gumilyov does not fit here. One people cannot just try to destroy another. Especially with pathological perseverance!
    So today it’s worth thinking about what really is behind the talks about democracy and alliance on the part of the West - is this yet another attempt to assert itself? ...
    There are many questions, but I personally see the answer in one thing - the dashing 90s of betrayal and moral corruption in Western patterns are behind and you need to rely only on yourself, as in the 41st. Then we will stand hi
    1. blizart
      blizart 24 November 2015 07: 16 New
      10
      A call in Stalin’s office. Stalin: "Hello Mr. Churchill."
      -No.
      -No.
      -No!
      -Yes.
      Hangs up. Kalinin timidly: "Comrade Stalin, you can ask what question you answered - yes?"
      -He asked if I can hear him well.
      1. Scraptor
        Scraptor 24 November 2015 12: 18 New
        0
        Stalin knew perfectly well that this was not the first flight of Hess, just in this flight his plane crashed and he caught the eye of the public.
    2. zekaze1980
      zekaze1980 24 November 2015 07: 24 New
      -6
      I also think that once the west was beneath us, the story is twisted and everything is forgotten.
    3. THE_SEAL
      THE_SEAL 24 November 2015 07: 53 New
      -7
      Europe fought and among themselves a lot. Sometimes drawing Russia into the maelstrom of war.
      1. Mareman Vasilich
        Mareman Vasilich 24 November 2015 09: 33 New
        +3
        Get out of here, you can see the fools a mile away.
  6. venaya
    venaya 24 November 2015 07: 04 New
    +4
    One hundred to one, that our modern "allies" ignore the materials authored by Comrade Stalin.

    The article is understandable, the only objection is that the so-called "allies" are not able to exist in this world without aggression, this is the most natural condition for them, otherwise they will lose the lion's share of their income. It is useful to understand this, so that we ourselves will not once again stumble upon an old rake.
    1. Throw
      Throw 24 November 2015 07: 10 New
      +6
      So who subsidized the advent of the Nazis to power? The same "allies" ...
  7. zekaze1980
    zekaze1980 24 November 2015 07: 19 New
    16
    The more a leader makes for a country, the more the west makes a villain out of him, this is to say that Comrade Stalin was far from a tyrant and a villain, as many now believe. Due to the policy of the West in relation to our country, we are obliged to keep the powder dry, unfortunately it is forever
  8. sledge
    sledge 24 November 2015 07: 24 New
    11
    Wise was the ruler! He is lacking now.
  9. Born in USSR
    Born in USSR 24 November 2015 07: 26 New
    +4
    Aha Amerikosy bombed anything in Germany but not industrial enterprises. And until the last they delivered to Natsik everything that they asked. Well, for one slightly fought. These figures can not be trusted, they are gentlemen to give them the floor and not restrain the usual thing. And you need to stay away from them, the art of deception and meanness in their blood.
    1. THE_SEAL
      THE_SEAL 24 November 2015 07: 51 New
      -43
      Read the story a little deeper, the radish is not far off. Stalin sent Hitler raw materials by echelons for the war against the same British. So what? With the hands of the Germans, we killed the Poles, the French and the British. Hitler sent Hess for friendship together against Soviet Russia. Churchill refused in favor of Russia. Study the story carefully and in detail, rather than read stupid articles like this.
      1. blizart
        blizart 24 November 2015 07: 57 New
        12
        Churchill refused in favor of Russia.
        So no one has insulted Churchill! No one!
        1. nemets
          nemets 24 November 2015 17: 27 New
          +1
          but it’s necessary, that still rat
      2. Darkness
        Darkness 24 November 2015 08: 07 New
        +3
        What is the intensity of schizophrenia !!!
      3. Poppy
        Poppy 24 November 2015 09: 33 New
        +4
        and besides suvorov, did you read anything else?
        1. Cat hippo
          Cat hippo 24 November 2015 15: 37 New
          +2
          Beat me !!! I wanted to write the same about Rezun to him :-)
      4. Ramzai
        Ramzai 24 November 2015 09: 35 New
        +3
        What darkness you have in your head. Been reading Suvorov-Rezunov and teach here pseudo-stories.
      5. Mareman Vasilich
        Mareman Vasilich 24 November 2015 09: 36 New
        +4
        A dull little one, in order for your vysers to be believable, it is necessary to justify them.
      6. made13
        made13 24 November 2015 10: 18 New
        +4
        Quote: THE_SEAL
        With the hands of the Germans, we killed the Poles, the French and the British.

        Apparently they killed a little.

        And now, instead of resources, Russia will supply militants trained in secret FSB camps in Syria. And in the total mass of refugees, the above-mentioned militants will finish off those who survived after hordes of Soviet invaders - Poles, French and British.

        Relax all - we will never know the truth. For me, my grandparents showed the figure - both survived the famine, the war, the post-war devastation, but I never heard a bad word about Stalin with the union or after its collapse.
      7. Dimachrus
        Dimachrus 24 November 2015 10: 42 New
        +3
        Very correct comment !!! TEACH THE HISTORY DEEPER, and not according to the manuals of the State Department !!!
      8. nemets
        nemets 24 November 2015 17: 26 New
        +1
        raw materials were supplied in exchange for machine tools and technologies, and only until 1941, and until April-May. Then the last echelons passed. This is what you need to learn history !!!!!!
      9. Weyland
        Weyland 24 November 2015 22: 39 New
        0
        Quote: THE_SEAL
        Churchill refused in favor of Russia


        Why? Churchill refused in favor Britain - otherwise I would have to share the colonies! laughing
  10. Military Builder
    Military Builder 24 November 2015 07: 58 New
    +2
    Once again, Russia was "given the honor" to free the world from another plague that was nourished by the "allies."
    But, if I’m not mistaken, Zhukov suggested that Stalin go to the USA, right now there would be much less problems in the world.
    1. Darkness
      Darkness 24 November 2015 08: 08 New
      +3
      It would end in mutual annihilation.
      Stalin was far from.
  11. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 24 November 2015 08: 01 New
    +4
    Trusting the naglosaks is just as foolish as trusting a herd of sheep with a wolf. The condition for the existence of their civilization is based on robbery and deceit. They hated the Russian world and will hate because we are different. I hope that our leaders understand this.
  12. V.ic
    V.ic 24 November 2015 08: 07 New
    +5
    Good article. You can add (+), you can’t decrease. The most prominent politician of the 20th century. Would Russia survive without him? My opinion - no, I would not survive. God preserves Russia, giving it, at critical moments of its existence, great people. Alexander Nevsky, Ivan IV, K.M. Minin and D.M. Pozharsky, Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin.
  13. nivander
    nivander 24 November 2015 08: 13 New
    +5
    why should Stalin’s work on Politics, according to contemporary scholars, be drawn to a very strong doctoral dissertation on the topic of Political Science?
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 24 November 2015 09: 35 New
      +1
      Quote: nivasander
      why should Stalin’s work on Politics, according to contemporary scholars, be drawn to a very strong doctoral dissertation on the topic of Political Science?

      Using computer analysis, the texts of writers, politicians, scientists, rhetoric speeches, logicians and priests were "read" ...
      The most informative according to the “opinion” of the computer was Pushkin’s phrase “Ah, finally we reached the gates of Madrid!”; the most convincing is Lenin's speech before the conclusion of the Brest Peace; the most reasoned with "peace and atmosphere" - this article of Stalin ...
      ... a machine, a computer - what to take from it! ...
  14. NeRTT
    NeRTT 24 November 2015 08: 19 New
    0
    Everything is new, well-forgotten old !!! belay
  15. Begemot
    Begemot 24 November 2015 08: 45 New
    +4
    In order to read Stalin, one needs not only intelligence in itself, but also a certain knowledge of history. If senior officials of the State Department or the same Power at the UN, not to mention Psaki and others like them, still believe that Hitler defeated Eisenhower alone, then what about the rest.
    1. nemets
      nemets 24 November 2015 17: 31 New
      0
      there was Obama's grandfather
  16. Mantykora
    Mantykora 24 November 2015 08: 59 New
    +5
    Quote: Begemot
    In order to read Stalin, one needs not only intelligence in itself, but also a certain knowledge of history. If senior officials of the State Department or the same Power at the UN, not to mention Psaki and others like them, still believe that Hitler defeated Eisenhower alone, then what about the rest.

    History always repeats itself, with slight deviations a step left and right ... Anyone who was interested in history in the school as a whole understands this. INTERESTED, and not thoughtlessly crammed dates.

    And Joseph Stalin is one of the greatest people not only in Russian, but also in world history. No matter how they were blamed, there's nothing to be done about it. I read his speech either at the opening of the UN, or at the Postdam Conference, I don’t remember ... he said that at least our generation and one or two more will remember the war. And so it happened. And indeed, much of what he spoke or wrote about is happening.
    1. Fat
      Fat 24 November 2015 09: 29 New
      10
      we should more often remind the liberals of I.V. Stalin
  17. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 24 November 2015 09: 11 New
    13
    Churchill asks Stalin:
    - What would you do with Hitler if he were captured?
    Stalin answers without hesitation:
    - He would have red-hot the poker and would have stuck it in the ass with a cold end.
    Churchill perplexed:
    - Why - cold?
    Stalin derogatoryly looks at the British prime minister:
    “So that you, Mr. Churchill, do not help Hitler pull her out.”
  18. Fat
    Fat 24 November 2015 09: 27 New
    +4
    every time a great leader
    1. nemets
      nemets 24 November 2015 17: 46 New
      +2
      here I am about the same thing: Stalin, Beria, Proskurov and many others. But all the same, they were led by one person
  19. valokordin
    valokordin 24 November 2015 09: 49 New
    +2
    Volodin's article is wonderful, correct, the vast majority of forum users appreciated it well. Not without enemies of the people with their minuses, this is the real class consciousness of these democrats. All who hate Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin is really an enemy of our people. One interesting observation regarding our Orthodox Church - I.V. Stalin was baptized, had a spiritual education at a level no worse than the present, was Great, saved the country and exalted it, restored the patriarchy, but the church did not canonize him, in contrast to Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov, who lost and ruined the country (not Gorbachev). The only thing is that he suffered a martyrdom together with family members, then Stalin also suffered a martyrdom, being poisoned. So judge by his deeds.
    1. nemets
      nemets 24 November 2015 17: 53 New
      0
      Incidentally, the results of the identification of the remains of the royal family were not made public, which casts doubt on their authenticity. In addition, they were compared with the current FAR RELATIVES. There is evidence that the family was not shot.
  20. YaMZ-238
    YaMZ-238 24 November 2015 09: 56 New
    +3
    Stalin this is Stalin .... Eh, it would be here now, Merkel would start building the bunker, then she would call all her friends, and together they would lose the core)))))
  21. Union_36
    Union_36 24 November 2015 09: 59 New
    +1
    Quote: THE_SEAL
    Read the story a little deeper, the radish is not far off. Stalin sent Hitler raw materials by echelons for the war against the same British. So what? With the hands of the Germans, we killed the Poles, the French and the British. Hitler sent Hess for friendship together against Soviet Russia. Churchill refused in favor of Russia. Study the story carefully and in detail, rather than read stupid articles like this.

    Good mister, I recommend reading A. Kurlandchik's “Damned Soviet Power”, otherwise you have a mess in your head.
    They have you, but you still wave
    1. MrK
      MrK 24 November 2015 11: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: Union_36
      Good mister, I recommend reading A. Kurlandchik's “Damned Soviet Power”, otherwise you have a mess in your head.


      May they not read Alexander Kurlandchik. For them, authority: a sub ... Khrushchev, a killer informer Solzhenitsyn and a traitor Rezun.
      1. tokens2
        tokens2 24 November 2015 22: 23 New
        0
        MrK
        May they not read Alexander Kurlandchik. For them, authority: a sub ... Khrushchev, the best informer Solzhenitsyn and the traitor Rezun.

        You mRARC also convincingly write .. well, or explain on the fingers smile with Claudia. I admit, I read you. Your last fantastic essay about 28 Panfilov’s people is very angry. Yes, I myself tried to write on “free” historical topics.
        It’s impossible for you (unfortunately) to say that there are no correct ideologies. There are only levers of control. An official and a leader are a “prosthesis” of a person. And whatever you call this “prosthesis” .. you can’t change the essence of a communist or capitalist one.
        Capitalist incidentally is more understandable to man.
        So ... 21st century technology (3D presence) repeat in our life, such an important link as the bureaucracy, will put an end to the dispute. What color is more beautiful ...
        And the fact that the dispute of ideologies is “beneficial” to today's elites of the whole world is a fact. For only with ideology, an elite superstructure is needed.
        Sincerely.
  22. Union_36
    Union_36 24 November 2015 10: 02 New
    +2
    Quote: THE_SEAL
    Read the story a little deeper, the radish is not far off. Stalin sent Hitler raw materials by echelons for the war against the same British. So what? With the hands of the Germans, we killed the Poles, the French and the British. Hitler sent Hess for friendship together against Soviet Russia. Churchill refused in favor of Russia. Study the story carefully and in detail, rather than read stupid articles like this.

    And it will become clear to you what the Soviet Union received in return for raw materials.
    Read my advice to you and much will become clear to you
    1. Oprichnik
      Oprichnik 24 November 2015 11: 24 New
      +2
      It is a pity that Stalin did not have time to disinfect all corners. So now creep out ... horses and maidanutny dives.
  23. Denis DV
    Denis DV 24 November 2015 10: 17 New
    +1
    One hundred to one that our modern "allies" ignore the materials for the authorship of Comrade Stalin. Well, in vain ... It is in vain ... It would not hurt to familiarize oneself in order not to step on the previous rake in attempts to incite the terrorist fodder on other states, naively believing that the fishery will not jump off the leash.


    A lot of things got away with them, and now they won’t bother. There is a mother Russia, she will answer for all, pay for everything. It’s time for mom to scold Euroshot to bruises soldier
  24. napalm
    napalm 24 November 2015 11: 37 New
    +5
    Quote: treble 72019
    Churchill asks Stalin:
    - What would you do with Hitler if he were captured?
    Stalin answers without hesitation:
    - He would have red-hot the poker and would have stuck it in the ass with a cold end.
    Churchill perplexed:
    - Why - cold?
    Stalin derogatoryly looks at the British prime minister:
    “So that you, Mr. Churchill, do not help Hitler pull her out.”


    Fell under the table with laughter. But all the truth is in this
  25. Wolka
    Wolka 24 November 2015 13: 45 New
    +1
    it began, an interesting scenario, however, is being played out, the Turks hit, now wait for the Svidomo dill to hit the Donbass, it is not for nothing that they de-energized the Crimea, and in the Mediterranean Sea an air raft with butterflies from France i.e. closed the theater from the west from the sea, all one links of the same chain ...
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. Basil50
    Basil50 24 November 2015 15: 53 New
    0
    The most * civilized * countries acted as a united front against SOVIET RUSSIA and completely killed people when they tried to turn people into slaves and RUSSIA into a colony. Then they raised the Nazis and again went on a united front to rob and kill. Killed Soviet citizens simply and routinely, even trying to philosophically substantiate their right to bestiality. What then, what today, all clerics, Nazis, fascists, * democrats *, * liberals * have a single platform for the struggle against memory AND IN STALIN and against the SOVIET UNION. * Touching * unity of all such * fighters * for * democracy * has survived to this day, they are not hindered by belonging to different parties and a different * worldview *. Today we are told about the right of robbers to rob and kill if they only declare any * political * claims against RUSSIA or RUSSIAN.
    1. Litsvin
      Litsvin 26 November 2015 21: 21 New
      -1
      You write everything correctly, but for some reason do not call our true enemies "by name." All of you and other forum participants are some kind of "democrats", "liberals", "liberalists". Well, call them by name - their name is the Masons. These are representatives of less than a dozen Jewish clans (the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Kunns, Leebovs, Schiffs, Schroeders, Bushes, etc.), which are a whole, homogeneous, thoroughly zionized financial and political elite of the United States, connected by tentacles with Israel and England. All the rest are secondary, tertiary or not worth the conversation at all.
      It is these figures who, over the past 4 centuries, have climbed into “Russia” with the wrong hands — they sent Germans, British, French, Turks, Japanese, Germans again. When they realized that Russia couldn’t defeat Russia from the outside, they found scum in our country - from the same back? Among his fellow tribesmen, the Jewish "kagal-international", in contrast to the delusional socialist international, which the Lenins-Blanques and Trotsky-Bronstein instilled into our workers and peasants, was not based on "equality-brotherhood of people", but on completely different completely earthly values ​​- rob the goy, take everything from him - his wife, property, children, land, and if the goy resist, kill him, he is not a human being. If you do not know who the goyim are, then I will enlighten you - these are all the peoples of the world except the Jews. This is written in their Talmud and other "books." Doesn't it remind anyone? That's right - goyim, i.e. subhuman are terms from the Talmud and Mine Kampf, since Hitler wrote his anti-human program from the Talmud, and did not invent it, he was too primitive to even compose Mine Kampf. The idea was given to him by the Jewish Masonic "cartridges" from England-USA, having started financing the NSDAP from the end of 1922 and brought Hitler to power for 10 years, creating a monster directed against the USSR. Therefore, call the enemy by his name.
  29. Aleksiy
    Aleksiy 24 November 2015 22: 30 New
    +1
    Right, Comrade Stalin was right, just do not compare him with Putin, it’s like a tiger to compare with a cat, it seems both are from the same family, but different.
  30. Ima tsoh
    Ima tsoh 25 November 2015 02: 12 New
    +2
    In the 20s, Stalin saved Russia from the direct seizure of power by the Jewish Communist Party. And another very big question is what happened if it happened. In any case, he lifted the country from the ruins twice before and after the war. There is such a strange fact that lighting a match to light a match did not catch fire. The factory director was fired. That is why it was possible to raise the country twice.
    You look at the sleek faces of people in government and at the faces of these businessmen today and compare their face with an ordinary Russian. These individuals seem to live separately from the people. Today, in reality, not a single Russian citizen can simply get into a state institution and receive help from these persons personifying the state. An official understands that one person is nothing and is so with millions. Stalin did not have time to create a single Soviet man. I did not manage to rally China India and the USSR. Our story is there but it really does not help us. It is presented at the usual level not by the SON OF THE RUSSIAN POWER.
  31. Litsvin
    Litsvin 25 November 2015 21: 17 New
    0
    GREAT STALIN was telling the truth. He was an intelligent man, not for nothing that he studied at the seminary. He did much to preserve the state and strengthen it. But then these swineherd-Khrushchev lied to him, i.e. undercut Zhidomassonian Trotskyists. He did not have time to enroll them all before the war, these Trotskyite Jews brought to power by the Yid masons from the USA. To a greater extent, he managed to clear only the OGPU and the Red Army from this pillowcase - various Yehudi-Hedgehogs, Tukhachevsky and Blucher. That saved Russia from the fifth column in the most important part of the state - the power departments. After his death, the Khrushchevs distorted the facts and called it "repressions of the Red Red Army commandos", "Stalinist purges of the OGPU", etc. But he would not have done this, Hitler would have conquered Russia. And this fifth column would help him from the inside. And then “all together” kagal - with the Jewish masons from the USA and Hitler would share the wealth of our homeland. We would finish what we could not do from 1917 to 1925 until Stalin came to power.
  32. Litsvin
    Litsvin 26 November 2015 22: 00 New
    0
    Quote: Litsvin
    You write everything correctly, but for some reason do not call our true enemies "by name." All of you and other forum participants are some kind of "democrats", "liberals", "liberalists". Well, call them by name - their name is the Masons. These are representatives of less than a dozen Jewish clans (the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Kunns, Leebovs, Schiffs, Schroeders, Bushes, etc.), which are a whole, homogeneous, thoroughly zionized financial and political elite of the United States, connected by tentacles with Israel and England. All the rest are secondary, tertiary or not worth the conversation at all.
    It is these figures who, over the past 4 centuries, have climbed into “Russia” with the wrong hands — they sent Germans, British, French, Turks, Japanese, Germans again. When they realized that Russia couldn’t defeat Russia from the outside, they found scum in our country - from the same back? Among his fellow tribesmen, the Jewish "kagal-international", in contrast to the delusional socialist international, which the Lenins-Blanques and Trotsky-Bronstein instilled into our workers and peasants, was not based on "equality-brotherhood of people", but on completely different completely earthly values ​​- rob the goy, take everything from him - his wife, property, children, land, and if the goy resist, kill him, he is not a human being. If you do not know who the goyim are, then I will enlighten you - these are all the peoples of the world except the Jews. This is written in their Talmud and other "books." Doesn't it remind anyone? That's right - goyim, i.e. subhuman are terms from the Talmud and Mine Kampf, since Hitler wrote his anti-human program from the Talmud, and did not invent it, he was too primitive to even compose Mine Kampf. The idea was given to him by the Jewish Masonic "cartridges" from England-USA, having started financing the NSDAP from the end of 1922 and brought Hitler to power for 10 years, creating a monster directed against the USSR. Therefore, call the enemy by his name.

    For now, the minions of the Zhidomasons are "minus" - well, it turns out that they are there too. This site is not only read by patriots of Russia, there are also those who want to turn Russia into a "kaganate". Do not be afraid, it will not work. You won’t send us any more Forms-Bronshetinv, as in 1917. We also learn from mistakes, including our own.