Military Review

Is the question of lifting the moratorium on the death penalty in Russia for terrorism so complicated? (Poll)

161

Do I need to abolish the moratorium on the death penalty in Russia?

I believe that the death penalty is not only permissible, but also necessary as a punishment for the most serious crimes - 1579 (92.18%)
92.18%
Return of the death penalty in Russia is unacceptable - 99 (5.78%)
5.78%
Hard to say - 35 (2.04%)
2.04%
The events of recent days willy-nilly make you think about it.


Presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, commenting on the proposal of the leader of the "Fair Russia" Sergei Mironov on the use of capital punishment for terrorism:

Is the question of lifting the moratorium on the death penalty in Russia for terrorism so complicated? (Poll)


"This is only a voiced proposal. The issue of the death penalty is extremely complex, and there is a lot of discussion. In the end, there is a decision on a moratorium, now we proceed from this moratorium."

Is this question really complicated?

Terrorism in all its glory is not that we are on the threshold, but our fellow citizens, being abroad, felt its presence. And, unfortunately and grief, not just felt. We suffered losses that in no way related to what is happening in Syria. Not soldiers died, absolutely peaceful people died.

It is worth considering here about what aspect. On the territory of our country were, are and will be present extremist elements. This does not require special evidence, just look at the reports of the KTO in the Caucasus. We began to interfere with too much of our foreign policy. And there will always be enough of those who decide to sow death and panic in the country.

Many remember very well what was going on here after Volgodonsk and Moscow.

The safety of our fellow citizens abroad is a special matter. I do not take those who do not imagine holidays in Russia. It really is their problem. And the problems of those countries that receive guests. Egypt will feel in its economy what it means to pay for sloppiness and unscrupulous extortion elevated to the rank of service. What happened in Egypt would have happened sooner or later. As a result, it happened, and, unfortunately, with the Russian aircraft. But it could well be both American and French.

Yes, it became clear that the flight outside of Russia has become unsafe. And many have already begun to speak out in such a way that if they had not been bombed in Syria, then everything would be fine. And their rest and everything else would not suffer. This is a separate question.

Today one thing is clear: Russia has embarked on a war against international religious terrorism. Point. And there is no other way out, as there was in the war against fascism. In principle, for me there is not much difference between a blue-eyed youngster in a black uniform screaming "Heil Hitler!" and the same guy, but bearded, in a dirty robe, screaming "Allah akbar!"

They have one goal - the destruction of all who do not fit under their framework. The only question is in the methods. And so - the fascism of the Nazis and the fanaticism of the Ishilovites were fed by one milk. More precisely, in blood.

The fact that they, the “warriors of Allah,” sooner or later, will come to us again, is obvious. And here questions arise. Yes, in terms of the readiness of our special services, there is no particular doubt. The fact that our offices will do everything possible to prevent new terrorist attacks in Russia is indisputable. But then what?

I am one of those who, with great joy, will read the messages that none of the terrorists have survived. He managed to undermine the "shahid belt", "shot himself with three shots to the head during arrest" and so on. But what to do with those who survive and fall into the hands of justice?

Plant for a long time or give a life sentence? So that the subhuman who took the lives of innocent people, devoured, drank, was treated at our expense? Did you write memoirs like Breivik? No, really need to change something. There is no sense in relying on the sudden pogrom as a former Chechen field commander on the “zones” to attack the terrorist.

Only one meaning. Anyone who trains terrorists, who finances, who makes them documents and supplies information must suffer a well-deserved punishment. According to the Bible - "an eye for an eye." Life for life. But for those who are not informed about the impending terrorist attack, especially if we are talking about the next of kin, it is possible to make relief. In the form of life.

What stops us from knowing that every terrorist knew - having stepped onto the path of war with Russia, he has no future?

The case has long gone. Specifically, 1996 is the year when PACE recommended that the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe invite Russia to become a member of the Council of Europe. And in this regard, sign within one year and ratify, not later than three years, Protocol No. 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (abolishing the death penalty) and establish a moratorium on executions from the date of entry.

16 May 1996 of the year Russian President Boris Yeltsin issued a decree “On the phased reduction of the use of the death penalty in connection with Russia's accession to the Council of Europe.”

16 April 1997 Russia signed Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the abolition of the death penalty. The State Duma was supposed to ratify it by May 1999. Despite the fact that the 6 protocol was never ratified by Russia (the only member state of the Council of Europe), from this point on, the death penalty in Russia is forbidden to be applied according to the Vienna Convention, which tells the signatory state to behave in accordance with agreement prior to its ratification.

Hooray, of course, the deputies. But look at the perspective.

Council of Europe ... Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe ... In principle, parasitic and impotent bodies, incapable of anything. Is it worth the security of our citizens? PACE recently showed its essence. The Council unanimously welcomed the sanctions against Russia. So what? The question is, how much will we lose because we will not be there?

In any case, we have no friends and allies in Europe. There are only "partners" whose essence is clear and understandable.

Fear of death will not stop a terrorist who carries death in the name of Allah. This has already been proven. The joy with which these animals are ready to destroy anyone who does not agree with their dogmas does not allow them to be considered as human beings at all.

The terrorist is not a man. This is a beast, this is a killer, regardless of gender and age. And only one punishment is destruction. That is, not the death penalty, and destruction. Like a mad jackal. The court is only a delay, it is an opportunity to get some more air, still live, something else to shout out.

Judgment and imprisonment for those who encroach on the lives of our fellow citizens is a luxury that we cannot afford. We have a war here.

But what to do with those who are really going to die? Perhaps the pursuit of all his family and friends. So that the creature in the human form, clinging to the “belt of the shahid” to know that by doing so, it condemns not only itself, but also its co-religionists and relatives to death.

In Europe, I can babysit as much as I like with the refugees. These healthy men who keep their photos in military uniform and with weapons. It is their democracy and their right. Our right, by the way, given to us by the Constitution of Russia, is the right to security. And if in order for the terrorists and their accomplices, in turn, not to feel safe, the corresponding amendments must be made to the Constitution.

What is more important - security and peaceful peaceful life of Russians, or “respect” in the eyes of Europe?

Europe, which calmly watched and did not see rocket and artillery shelling in Yugoslavia, Libya, in the Donbas. Europe, which stubbornly refused to see the use of phosphorus shells by Ukrainian executioners. Europe does not want to see anything of what it does not want.

We have long understood that Russia is not Europe. This is Russia. And run on about the European tucked to the detriment of their own security - is not it shameful?

The issue of the resumption of the death penalty for terrorism and aiding terrorism is not so complicated. He is simple. The terrorist must be destroyed. When and how, by a court decision or in any other circumstances, here I can not unequivocally answer. I can only redirect such a question to a person who has vast experience in solving such problems. To Ramzan Akhmetovich Kadyrov.
Author:
161 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. BLOND
    BLOND 23 November 2015 06: 37 New
    94
    I am for the death penalty!
    - terrorism
    - treason
    - theft in especially large ...
    - child abuse
    (maybe not all listed)
    Suppose with a delay of a year or two (you never know who was illegally convicted, appeal), but feed the enemy, maniac, traitor ...
    1. hedgehog in the fog
      hedgehog in the fog 23 November 2015 06: 48 New
      57
      I would also add the spread of drugs, and so I will tell you my opinion, those who want to cooperate and can cooperate. Contain in special special prisons, and the rest, at an expense immediately
      1. insafufa
        insafufa 23 November 2015 07: 09 New
        +2
        Let me be minus but I’ll say

        For any criminal, there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions. Godina must be tormented to the end of her days in non-human conditions, having drunk her cup to the end. In Chechnya, I always had a grenade in my pocket so that the living would not be captured better than an easy death than a nightmare of captivity from militants.

        I am against lifting the moratorium on the death penalty
        1. KOH
          KOH 23 November 2015 07: 42 New
          31
          But is it not better to spend the money that is spent on maintenance (from the media I heard about 40000 rubles a month for one suicide bomber) for some good deeds, why the victims of these freaks should support them, no, I am for the death penalty for 5 years, for example, this is about if you made a mistake ...
        2. Nik_One
          Nik_One 23 November 2015 07: 54 New
          +5
          Quote: insafufa
          Let me be minus but I’ll say

          I also agree in you.
          The death penalty is a serious question, what would it be decided on quickly at the peak of psychosis. The decision must be balanced and thought out.
          What will the estimated execution decide now if it is urgently introduced? Do all terrorists get scared and throw weapons at once? Or do suicide bombers change their minds about undermining themselves? What will be that!?
          Is this proposal right now just complacency? It is clear that people in most votes will be happy with the death penalty, as one of the opportunities to defend themselves against terrorists. But will this be true, not hope?
          Nothing prevents the elimination of extremists in place. Yes, even if you grab and plant them, you can provide them with an absolutely unenviable existence (remember Raduyev).
          And with regards to the latest proposals of the deputies, do not forget that we will have elections soon ... Therefore, now I want to say popular things.
          1. kuz363
            kuz363 23 November 2015 09: 17 New
            13
            And why in the USA do not abolish the death penalty? But this is a country of true democracy!
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. THE_SEAL
              THE_SEAL 23 November 2015 21: 35 New
              0
              Quote: kuz363
              And why in the USA do not abolish the death penalty? But this is a country of true democracy!

              Some states canceled. Each state has its own laws. There is no king and a rigid vertical of power. And sms pay taxes. This is democracy. But we don’t understand much, because grew up in the system of zonal mutual responsibility, which now stands at the head of our country. If you are a thief, but a friend, then the laws do not apply to you. Serdyukov and Yakunin are the most prominent representatives. And let all sorts of bullshit patriots minus. Maybe at least it will reach someone.
              1. Old old
                Old old 24 November 2015 21: 32 New
                0
                Each state has its own laws. There is no king and a rigid vertical of power.

                Each region of the Russian Federation also has its own laws, as well as federal laws in the United States. And they also pay taxes on the Russian Federation.
                And why are these liberal libel?
          2. afdjhbn67
            afdjhbn67 23 November 2015 11: 53 New
            +2
            Quote: Nik_One
            The death penalty is a serious question, what would it be decided on quickly at the peak of psychosis. The decision must be balanced and thought out.

            And where is the peak of psychosis ?? 20 years already about this 90 percent of the population speaks, minus lovers of cats and dogs
            and the "broad" liberal public ...
          3. kotvov
            kotvov 23 November 2015 12: 58 New
            +1
            Nothing prevents the elimination of extremists in place. ,,
            this is not always appropriate, sometimes a lot of interesting things can be shaken out of the terms. If you participated in actions (prepared, supplied, transported, laid) only the tower.
          4. Old old
            Old old 24 November 2015 21: 19 New
            0
            Nothing prevents the elimination of extremists in place. Yes, even if you grab and plant them, you can provide them with an absolutely unenviable existence (remember Raduyev).

            The Criminal Code, departmental orders and the prosecutor’s office interfere. "Elimination of extremists" is possible ONLY with armed resistance.
            In other cases - 7-12 years and parole after 3/4 of the term.
        3. wasjasibirjac
          wasjasibirjac 23 November 2015 08: 40 New
          +3
          Quote: insafufa
          For any criminal there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions. Godina must be tormented to the end of her days in non-human conditions, having drunk her cup to the end.

          and who should torment him in the "zones"? because you have to create a special service and recruit special people. the executioner should just do his job. and in the case of detention under conditions of constant "suffering" the staff may have very specific deviations.
          1. dengy12
            dengy12 23 November 2015 09: 12 New
            -3
            Quote: wasjasibirjac
            Quote: insafufa
            For any criminal there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions. Godina must be tormented to the end of her days in non-human conditions, having drunk her cup to the end.

            and who should torment him in the "zones"? because you have to create a special service and recruit special people. the executioner should just do his job. and in the case of detention under conditions of constant "suffering" the staff may have very specific deviations.

            on the nightingales there was such a thing as a stone bag
        4. gingerbread man 59
          gingerbread man 59 23 November 2015 09: 51 New
          21
          respected. one prisoner costs us taxpayers 35 thousand rubles a month. he killed my family. I work and pay taxes and my taxes go to the maintenance of the killer. but I need this. it’s better to soak it 9 grams costs 1 ruble and you don’t equal the captives at the jackals with a prison cell. this is heaven and earth with a delay I agree 2 years no more
          1. BIGLESHIY
            BIGLESHIY 23 November 2015 14: 41 New
            +1
            Quote: Gingerbread Man 59
            respected. one prisoner costs us taxpayers 35 thousand rubles a month. he killed my family. I work and pay taxes and my taxes go to the maintenance of the killer. but I need this. it’s better to soak it 9 grams costs 1 ruble and you don’t equal the captives at the jackals with a prison cell. this is heaven and earth with a delay I agree 2 years no more

            Or maybe their organs? Maybe at least someone will be saved last.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. 1234567890
              1234567890 23 November 2015 20: 25 New
              0
              To the organs? No, better for pigs, for feed!
        5. tol
          tol 23 November 2015 10: 03 New
          +3
          Quote: insafufa
          Let me be minus but I’ll say

          For any criminal, there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions. Godina must be tormented to the end of her days in non-human conditions, having drunk her cup to the end. In Chechnya, I always had a grenade in my pocket so that the living would not be captured better than an easy death than a nightmare of captivity from militants.

          I am against lifting the moratorium on the death penalty


          And they are contained even with our money! They sit alone, do nothing (although it’s clear that it’s very difficult to sit all my life), nor the Stalin Kolyma - quarry or lumbering
          1. insafufa
            insafufa 23 November 2015 10: 30 New
            0
            Quote: tol


            And they are contained even with our money! They sit alone, do nothing (although it’s clear that it’s very difficult to sit all my life), nor the Stalin Kolyma - quarry or lumbering


            And it’s worth returning a quarry for them

            A man who is doomed is much more dangerous than a simple man who has something to lose and can go out for udo
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 23 November 2015 11: 28 New
              +3
              You apparently didn’t come across convicts .. firstly, after the VMN was issued in Soviet times, there were practically no escape or hostage-taking by those sentenced ..
              1. THE_SEAL
                THE_SEAL 23 November 2015 21: 44 New
                -3
                Quote: afdjhbn67
                You apparently didn’t come across convicts .. firstly, after the VMN was issued in Soviet times, there were practically no escape or hostage-taking by those sentenced ..

                Where does the data come from? For the entire period?
              2. The comment was deleted.
        6. MATROSKIN-53
          MATROSKIN-53 23 November 2015 10: 27 New
          -15
          Oh no. For example, Beria, when he heard his death sentence, he immediately crap and pissed ...
          1. cuzmin.mihail2013
            cuzmin.mihail2013 23 November 2015 18: 19 New
            +3
            From various sources - Beria was killed during his arrest. And even if he was at the trial, I can only assert about his behavior who was nearby. Did you escort him?
        7. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 23 November 2015 11: 55 New
          +1
          Quote: insafufa
          I am against lifting the moratorium on the death penalty

          95 percent of terrorism is Islamic .... repeat negative
          1. afdjhbn67
            afdjhbn67 23 November 2015 15: 34 New
            +2
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            95 percent of terrorism is Islamic ....

            Maybe apart from the minus, bring the facts against ???? wassat
        8. perm23
          perm23 23 November 2015 12: 08 New
          +1
          If in inhuman conditions, then okay. But they have some kind of conditions - no one beats, doesn’t torment, does not scoff, they do not work. Sit, sleep, eat, read. Here is another matter. If they were to some kind of work, so that they would die from the strain then. And here .
        9. Max_Bauder
          Max_Bauder 23 November 2015 12: 30 New
          +2
          Quote: insafufa
          For any criminal, there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions.


          To torment a criminal is the same sin as his deed, why become like him and become just as evil ?! Isn’t it better to just save the world from the suffering of the criminal by simply taking his life, but at the same time showing indulgence and forgiveness to him by putting him to death as painlessly as possible. Even before they gave soap to those whom they hung.

          Quote: insafufa
          In Chechnya, I always had a grenade in my pocket so that the living would not be captured better than an easy death than a nightmare of captivity from militants.


          As for captivity, you are right, only faith in the inevitable shameful and cruel death in captivity can deter a soldier from simply surrendering, summing up the trust of colleagues and the motherland who counted on you, captivity is the removal of responsibility.
        10. washi
          washi 23 November 2015 15: 46 New
          0
          Quote: insafufa
          Let me be minus but I’ll say

          For any criminal, there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions. Godina must be tormented to the end of her days in non-human conditions, having drunk her cup to the end. In Chechnya, I always had a grenade in my pocket so that the living would not be captured better than an easy death than a nightmare of captivity from militants.

          I am against lifting the moratorium on the death penalty

          I agree with you, but this applies to performers.
          And there are still customers and intermediaries, agitators. But they are afraid of death.
        11. His
          His 23 November 2015 17: 52 New
          0
          I agree. Workdays at the mines are needed. Eternal hard labor.
        12. cuzmin.mihail2013
          cuzmin.mihail2013 23 November 2015 17: 56 New
          0
          You were a warrior in Chechnya. For you, death was a deliverance from a non-human life in captivity, torment from the hands of enemies. You killed them, but you did not kill the children and women of your enemies, even though it was a war.
          People have driven into their heads that their religion, or the rules of life, or the laws of their people, or ..., should be an axiom for the people around them, while recognizing only one rule: either you acknowledge it, or you die. This is the goal of any war. Here are just a means of achieving it can be different ...
          Thugs who drove into their heads (or allowing someone to do it) that it is most effective to kill as many peaceful people as possible (even though they are confident that their death will be rewarded in the afterlife), in no way, should not stay alive! At the same time, it doesn’t matter when, during detention or after the trial, after the terrorist act or before it. To be honest, I would also do so that (in accordance with his religion) it was not possible for him to count on the afterlife.
        13. 1234567890
          1234567890 23 November 2015 19: 31 New
          +1
          Quote: insafufa
          For any criminal, there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions.

          1. Really? Did you communicate a lot with criminals? Did they tell you that?
          2. Everything flows, everything changes:
          - the conditions of detention may change: today in "inhuman conditions" (and where are they?), tomorrow - in a three-room suite like Breivik;
          - another liberalization of the criminal code may occur, and the law is retroactive in any mitigation (but not vice versa);
          - may come to power some liberal zopa with snot to the knee and have mercy on everyone;
          - Yes, it can just become too expensive for all this shoblu to contain; it would be more logical in this case to shoot everyone like mad dogs, but we have a legal and democratic state;
          - you don’t foresee everything, anything can happen, even green men from outer space are just a category of bipedal erectus, which in any situation is better to be anywhere, but not among the living.
        14. THE_SEAL
          THE_SEAL 23 November 2015 21: 40 New
          -2
          Quote: insafufa
          Let me be minus but I’ll say

          For any criminal, there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions. Godina must be tormented to the end of her days in non-human conditions, having drunk her cup to the end. In Chechnya, I always had a grenade in my pocket so that the living would not be captured better than an easy death than a nightmare of captivity from militants.

          I am against lifting the moratorium on the death penalty

          I have a plus. It is nice to read an adequate comment by a smart person.
          Inadequate sputtering read carefully thoughtfully. Maybe it will.
        15. The comment was deleted.
        16. Ria
          Ria 24 November 2015 02: 03 New
          0
          Most of the creatures we are discussing have no desire for death — neither easy nor any other. They carefully disguise themselves so as not to get caught. Suicide bombers do not count, they usually do not survive before the trial, because they are absolutely zombie and inadequate. It will be very useful for everyone else who has chosen the path of murderers and sadists to learn about the abolition of the moratorium on the use of the death penalty for serious crimes.
        17. free
          free 24 November 2015 07: 57 New
          0
          nonsense !!!!!!!!, these are completely different things, if you don’t want them to die quickly and for what they paid in full, then by your logic they need to be tormented by medieval torture, did you understand correctly?
        18. Old old
          Old old 24 November 2015 19: 36 New
          +1
          In Chechnya, I always had a grenade in my pocket so that the living would not be captured better than an easy death than a nightmare of captivity from militants.

          Those. Chechen Zindan and the prison cell with prosecutor visits, etc. etc. - It is the same? Are you confusing anything?
        19. IRINA-IRINA
          IRINA-IRINA 4 December 2015 22: 03 New
          0
          Something I did not see that those convicted of embezzlement in especially large ... suffered in inhuman conditions. For example, from the last Vasiliev.
      2. Dembel77
        Dembel77 23 November 2015 07: 14 New
        12
        The terrorist must be destroyed. When and how, by court order or in any other circumstances - here I can not answer unequivocally.
        I agree with the author, but with one caveat - it would be better by court order. Those. by making changes to the law (in fact, only lifting the moratorium), the society will protect itself to a greater extent from crimes related to the mass killings of civilians, that is, terrorism. And Europe can be reminded that the death penalty in their beloved USA is a legal punishment in 32 states. Currently, laws in various states provide five methods of the death penalty: hanging, shooting, electric chair, gas chamber and lethal injection. Those. for every taste. Although for me, it would be better to hang or burn these shaitans, like mad dogs.
        1. exalibor
          exalibor 23 November 2015 07: 42 New
          17
          For them, the worst thing would be hanging or death from dogs, and then bury it together with pork carcasses so that they wouldn’t end up in paradise ....
          1. zeleznijdorojnik
            zeleznijdorojnik 23 November 2015 18: 04 New
            0
            You can still drown in bags - they also won’t get to the guria.
        2. 1234567890
          1234567890 23 November 2015 20: 43 New
          0
          Quote: Dembel 77
          I agree with the author, but with one caveat - it would be better by court order.

          Add: by hanging, publicly, if possible at the place of last residence.
          With dogs and pork carcasses is also good, but I try to somehow stay in frames.
      3. Penzuck
        Penzuck 23 November 2015 08: 47 New
        -4
        Quote: hedgehog in the fog
        drugs spreading

        Children to execute too? which adults have bored?
        This is the whole problem in "network marketing." A drug addict “catches up” and lures others ... To buy the next dose, he “works” with the supplier ... Death is the last thing they think about. I think it is necessary to plant drug addicts. But the "wholesalers" ... the "manufacturers", those who are promoting ... This is where you need to work ..
        1. V.ic
          V.ic 23 November 2015 09: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: Penzuck
          I think it is necessary to plant drug addicts. But the "wholesalers" ... "manufacturers", those who promote ...

          And to feed them their nonsense, so that they do not survive to release.
          1. Tiger4
            Tiger4 23 November 2015 11: 58 New
            +1
            It is better to enter in the form of an enema until it swells!
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. zeleznijdorojnik
          zeleznijdorojnik 23 November 2015 18: 06 New
          0
          For a batch more than a kilogram. Otherwise, the "werewolf in uniform" can throw a box - and opa - the tower breaks. It’s harder to throw a kilogram. Although we now judge the owner of 5 and a half grams and 50 kilograms under one article - in large sizes.
        4. Old old
          Old old 24 November 2015 19: 39 New
          0
          Children to execute too? which adults have bored?

          Do not distort! "They are still children!"
    2. dmit-xnumx
      dmit-xnumx 23 November 2015 07: 59 New
      +7
      - I could not resist and added for the falsification of drugs.
    3. NeRTT
      NeRTT 23 November 2015 08: 26 New
      +4
      I fully support !!! And I will add:
      -corruption
      -murder
      - violence is not only over children !!
      - calls for radicalism and recruitment !!
      Something like this..
    4. rpek32
      rpek32 23 November 2015 08: 27 New
      +2
      The survey is not representative. The same as asking for ex Muskva whether Putin should leave
    5. Penzuck
      Penzuck 23 November 2015 08: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: BLOND
      I am for the death penalty!
      - for this you need to be absolutely crystalline and clean. And similarly, think so for "all of humanity against rascals and other bastards."
      1.
      Quote: BLOND
      - terrorism
      - terrorism has a lot of definitions ... Basayev, Khattab, Raduev finished? ... no death penalty was introduced.
      2.
      Quote: BLOND
      - treason
      - the death penalty will not give anything. One member of the Security Council ended ... no death penalty was introduced.
      3.
      Quote: BLOND
      - theft in especially large ...
      - there’s nonsense ...
      4.
      Quote: BLOND
      - child abuse
      - "Violence" - is it a priest belt? Or put in a corner? For a month to deprive of chocolate? This is violence ... If you are not in the know ...
      To call for the abolition of the moratorium, you must have an 100% guarantee of the correctness of the decision on the death penalty. IMHO.
    6. GUKTU
      GUKTU 23 November 2015 08: 31 New
      14
      Wake up !!! At our level of corruption in the country, they will shoot the unwanted. Any law-abiding citizen can be brought under a firing squeeze !!! Or do you believe in the impartiality of our courts ???? In vain if so
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. creak
        creak 23 November 2015 10: 47 New
        +3
        Quote: GUKTU
        Wake up !!! At our level of corruption in the country, they will shoot the unwanted. Any law-abiding citizen can be brought under a firing squeeze !!! Or do you believe in the impartiality of our courts ????


        So they are so merciless, because for some reason they are sure that they won’t put them nose to the wall on trumped-up charges ... Insight will come to some when they order it themselves and bring them under a firing squad ...
        Even in the USSR there were cases when, before the real killer was caught, innocent people were shot, and this is when the level of corruption in the law enforcement system was simply incomparable with the current one and still ...
        You can always remove a scumbag while trying to resist, without any death penalty and ceremonies, as put, for example, 14 bandits a few days ago in Kabardino-Balkaria.
        And the question is closed, without cries and tantrums ...
      3. figter
        figter 23 November 2015 11: 17 New
        0
        GUKTU SU Today, 08: 31 ↑ New
        Wake up !!! At our level of corruption in the country, they will shoot the unwanted. Any law-abiding citizen can be brought under a firing squeeze !!! Or do you believe in the impartiality of our courts ???? In vain if so

        I completely agree. Russian courts are not independent, court decisions are made by order from above, and not as required by law and conscience, a huge proportion of such decisions are not only illegal, but simply illiterate. It is illegal to kill people at the state level.
        In addition, being convicted for life is much harder than being shot. This is a tougher punishment - to realize that until the end of your days you will walk in cancer never seeing freedom.
        1. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 23 November 2015 15: 17 New
          0
          Quote: figter
          being convicted for life is much harder than being shot.

          And will you feed him at your own expense for humanitarian reasons? I strongly disagree on this! The reptile should not live at my expense!
          A few years ago there was a case when our deputy strongly advocated a humane attitude to rapists. Until his daughter was raped. From this moment, the rhetoric of this “protector” has changed exactly 180 degrees! So here.
          1. figter
            figter 23 November 2015 16: 31 New
            +3
            Yes, I will feed it to you too, because there is no guarantee of the correct interpretation and application of the law, and with the lifting of the moratorium against the backdrop of human grief, there will be a lot of careerists - “fighters against terror” - updated “Yezhovs”, “Berries” and a hedgehog with them, which from the screen will denounce "evil" and climb up the corpses. And if tomorrow you find yourself under this moloch? Or are you insured against this and this cannot happen to you? If someone needs it, then do not wash yourself off from the accusation, be at least three times innocent and legally literate. I do not regret the terrorists, I am ready to strangle these creatures with my own hands, but I do not want to give the opportunity to unclean ones to clear their way with the help of the Law.
      4. Old old
        Old old 24 November 2015 20: 04 New
        0
        Wake up !!! At our level of corruption in the country, they will shoot the unwanted. Any law-abiding citizen can be brought under a firing squeeze !!! Or do you believe in the impartiality of our courts ???? In vain if so

        "At our level of corruption" have all the "objectionable" been sentenced to life sentence or not yet? Not everyone else? Strange ...
    7. sherp2015
      sherp2015 23 November 2015 08: 32 New
      +4
      Quote: BLOND
      I am for the death penalty!


      For terrorism is not even discussed ...
      And also for the actions of senior officials aimed at the collapse of the state, as well as the deterioration of the life of the people
    8. Kalmar
      Kalmar 23 November 2015 08: 57 New
      -1
      Quote: BLOND
      I am for the death penalty!

      And what will it give? What matters is not the severity of the punishment, but its (punishment) inevitability. And to sit until the end of his days in a small cage - fate is not much more pleasant than shooting.

      So it is not lawmakers who should try here, since our laws are already quite strict, but, first of all, the investigating authorities and special services. Terrorists should burn the ground under their feet; they should know that by stepping on a curve path they will certainly be caught and punished.
    9. Bugor
      Bugor 23 November 2015 09: 39 New
      +2
      And I am against. Remind you how in the Chikatilo case the innocent was soaked?
      New circumstances may always arise. And as a source of information - any, operational, for example, this is a reference office. We go into the camera and ask. We get the answers. Let Under pressure, but we get. Analysts are sitting - wrinkling their brains. The analyst’s wrinkled brain can save many lives.
      And you won’t ask the corpse.
      Let them live. Alone.
    10. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 23 November 2015 09: 40 New
      +1
      From the point of view of religion, and of God, we are of course not in the right to take away the life that we did not give, God is “merciful and forgiving,” “judge not, let us not be judged,” the scriptures tell us, but here logic harnesses, and the assumption is the same religion, that by putting another person to death, we save the lives of one or two or more people, depending on the level of danger of the person being punished. Example - the security forces destroy the militants who committed the terrorist attack, if they are released, have mercy, the militants destroy even more people, there is no guarantee that after serving the sentence, or the venality of the judges, they will not do the same. So the murder is justified - if it is committed to save the lives of others. Another thing is to kill a person who was not the cause of death of other people. For example, brutal murders and mutilations of people in Arab, Muslim countries for theft, adultery, insulting religion, wearing inappropriate clothing and other crimes of a light nature. In the US, the cops shoot simply because the suspect did not obey their orders. It’s possible to imprison for such a thing, to compensate the injured party, but the killing is too much.
      Only two things, in my opinion, can be attributed to serious crimes punishable by death, like killing other people, this is the sale of drugs and the betrayal of the motherland.
      1. Bugor
        Bugor 23 November 2015 19: 37 New
        0
        Max Bauder.
        If you use paragraphs, the text will be much more readable.
        In turnips plusan ...
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. atalef
      atalef 23 November 2015 11: 02 New
      +8
      Quote: BLOND
      I am for the death penalty!
      - terrorism
      - treason
      - theft in especially large ...
      - child abuse
      (maybe not all listed)
      Suppose with a delay of a year or two (you never know who was illegally convicted, appeal), but feed the enemy, maniac, traitor ...

      100%.
      I would remove theft, state treason - only for active servicemen or during the war.
      But for the distribution of drugs (to the heads of drug cartels - added)
      And for terrorism - unambiguously and without any talk.
      1. Dazdranagon
        Dazdranagon 23 November 2015 11: 24 New
        -1
        Quote: atalef
        And for terrorism - unambiguously and without any talk.
        - And I would also introduce a prison sentence for close relatives with the seizure of property from them up to housing.
        1. atalef
          atalef 23 November 2015 11: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: Dazdranagon
          Quote: atalef
          And for terrorism - unambiguously and without any talk.
          - And I would also introduce a prison sentence for close relatives with the seizure of property from them up to housing.

          Well, this is superfluous. All the same, we must remain in elementary legal norms
          1. Dazdranagon
            Dazdranagon 23 November 2015 12: 33 New
            +2
            Quote: atalef
            Well, this is superfluous. All the same, we must remain in elementary legal norms
            - Europe has already become tolerant ... But in Israel they do not destroy the houses of terrorists?
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. atalef
              atalef 23 November 2015 13: 03 New
              -1
              Quote: Dazdranagon
              Quote: atalef
              Well, this is superfluous. All the same, we must remain in elementary legal norms
              - Europe has already become tolerant ... But in Israel they do not destroy the houses of terrorists?


              They are destroying it - but this is not the death penalty, all the more so as the court approves the decision - they will take everything out, and then the Palestinian administration will rebuild a new house for them.
              Quote: andj61
              Only not for distribution, but in a different wording - for organizing a criminal community in terms of the spread of drugs!

              I meant it
              Quote: andj61
              Terrorism is precisely the most serious crimes. And even pouring shit - literally - a politician under terrorism can be brought.

              and I agree with that. hi
        2. IRINA-IRINA
          IRINA-IRINA 4 December 2015 22: 37 New
          0
          Quote: Dazdranagon
          Quote: atalef
          And for terrorism - unambiguously and without any talk.
          - And I would also introduce a prison sentence for close relatives with the seizure of property from them up to housing.

          Stupidity! then close the school, where the terrorist studied, and shoot the teachers!
      2. andj61
        andj61 23 November 2015 12: 22 New
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        I would remove theft, state treason - only for active servicemen or during the war.
        good
        Quote: atalef
        But for the distribution of drugs (to the heads of drug cartels - added)

        Only not for distribution, but in a different wording - for organizing a criminal community in terms of the spread of drugs!
        Quote: atalef
        And for terrorism - unambiguously and without any talk.

        Terrorism is precisely the most serious crimes. And even pouring shit - literally - a politician under terrorism can be brought.
        hi
    13. SibSlavRus
      SibSlavRus 23 November 2015 11: 08 New
      +4
      This red-headed “talking head” of the Kremlin takes on a bit too much in its own judgments. In the end, not he and his boss LEGISLATIVE POWER in the country.
      And the only source of power is the people, not the presidential administration and the government.

      It is not clear what the problem is ?!
      Conduct a referendum if you (legislators) are afraid to make decisions.
      So already you do not have people's trust for your mediocrity and incompetence.

      Or is there a moratorium on the referendum ?!
      1. Tambov Wolf
        Tambov Wolf 23 November 2015 11: 44 New
        +1
        "This is only a voiced proposal. The issue of the death penalty is extremely complex, and a lot of discussion is underway. In the end, there is a decision on a moratorium, now we proceed from this moratorium." Response of the liberal-secretary to the liberal of the president. Do you want to be shot for 35 million rubles? Then they will shoot you for a piece of bread that you will keep in the store when you have nothing to eat. And with Messrs. Ulyukaevs, Chubais (watching) and others like them, this can soon be easy.
        1. THE_SEAL
          THE_SEAL 23 November 2015 21: 53 New
          -1
          Quote: Tambov Wolf
          "This is only a voiced proposal. The issue of the death penalty is extremely complex, and a lot of discussion is underway. In the end, there is a decision on a moratorium, now we proceed from this moratorium." Response of the liberal-secretary to the liberal of the president. Do you want to be shot for 35 million rubles? Then they will shoot you for a piece of bread that you will keep in the store when you have nothing to eat. And with Messrs. Ulyukaevs, Chubais (watching) and others like them, this can soon be easy.

          Yes. Dima Sands at the wrong time with his watch lit up. Around the crisis. People do not understand. Yes, Putin, devouring steaks, caused me some rejection.

          О
        2. THE_SEAL
          THE_SEAL 23 November 2015 21: 53 New
          -1
          Quote: Tambov Wolf
          "This is only a voiced proposal. The issue of the death penalty is extremely complex, and a lot of discussion is underway. In the end, there is a decision on a moratorium, now we proceed from this moratorium." Response of the liberal-secretary to the liberal of the president. Do you want to be shot for 35 million rubles? Then they will shoot you for a piece of bread that you will keep in the store when you have nothing to eat. And with Messrs. Ulyukaevs, Chubais (watching) and others like them, this can soon be easy.

          Yes. Dima Sands at the wrong time with his watch lit up. Around the crisis. People do not understand. Yes, Putin, devouring steaks, caused me some rejection.

          О
    14. sub307
      sub307 23 November 2015 13: 42 New
      +3
      Personally, my opinion (like "botany") is to "hollow" on a bamboo shoot ... and water until the head gets watered through the crown.
    15. The comment was deleted.
    16. Dimka999
      Dimka999 23 November 2015 14: 07 New
      0
      The death penalty is an easy way. Let these bastards suffer!
    17. zeleznijdorojnik
      zeleznijdorojnik 23 November 2015 17: 59 New
      0
      I bet. For life, the survival period is not more than 5 years. We are not in Norway, in whose prison Breivik is chilling. Why please those sentenced with quick death - wait for it yourself much more painful.
    18. Kostya Andreev
      Kostya Andreev 23 November 2015 20: 26 New
      0
      Good evening, I also decided to comment a little, a little.: Execution is executed by you, and if there is a miscarriage of justice, then you will be executed.
    19. THE_SEAL
      THE_SEAL 23 November 2015 21: 15 New
      0
      Blond - the main thing is the inevitability of punishment. And the rest should be the court to understand. And for treason, many of the country's leadership and their minions must be judged.
    20. Private27
      Private27 24 November 2015 04: 51 New
      +1
      I am also for the death penalty on these articles by hanging, and even better on the count
    21. free
      free 24 November 2015 08: 00 New
      0
      behind !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  2. viscount
    viscount 23 November 2015 06: 38 New
    +1
    Worthy clarification !!!!
    + + + + +
  3. astronom1973n
    astronom1973n 23 November 2015 06: 43 New
    +8
    Any repeat crime is the death penalty!
    The drug dealer is the death penalty!
    A government official or civil servant implicated in corruption and theft of the people is the death penalty!
    Cop (policeman), roofing criminals, the death penalty!
    1. dmit-xnumx
      dmit-xnumx 23 November 2015 08: 07 New
      +5
      - (Corruption and embezzlement + confiscation of property and from relatives)
      1. Penzuck
        Penzuck 23 November 2015 08: 50 New
        +1
        Quote: dmit-52
        - (Corruption and embezzlement + confiscation of property and from relatives)

        and 10% in favor of the scammer? wassat
    2. sherp2015
      sherp2015 23 November 2015 08: 25 New
      +7
      Quote: astronom1973n
      A government official or civil servant implicated in corruption and theft of the people is the death penalty!
      Cop (policeman), roofing criminals, the death penalty!



      What are you? We will not have a government and the Ministry of Internal Affairs will disappear ...))
  4. hohkn
    hohkn 23 November 2015 06: 48 New
    13
    Terrorists are our enemies, and the enemy must be destroyed. I am for lifting the moratorium! hi
  5. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 23 November 2015 06: 58 New
    14
    I do not want to feed any m.r.a.s.!!: TO THE WALL!
    1. Junior, I
      Junior, I 23 November 2015 07: 11 New
      +5
      As far as I remember, they used to support themselves before. Fulfilled some orders. And now it most likely contains the state. Therefore, I am also for keeping them as few as possible in prisons and more in the land.
    2. Penzuck
      Penzuck 23 November 2015 08: 52 New
      -2
      Before they caught Chekatilo, how many people were convicted? How many have finished?
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      I do not want to feed any m.r.a.s.!!: TO THE WALL!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. BLOND
        BLOND 23 November 2015 10: 44 New
        +4
        and you ask the relatives of the victims Chekatilo - he needs to live?
        How much more could he ...?
        And those who condemned the innocent must be at the same time or measure ...
        1. Penzuck
          Penzuck 23 November 2015 15: 53 New
          +1
          Quote: BLOND
          and you ask the relatives of the victims Chekatilo - he needs to live?
          How much more could he ...?
          And those who condemned the innocent must be at the same time or measure ...

          Simple: 1. A judge passes a death sentence making sure that the investigation proved ...
          2. The prosecutor proves, relying on the data of the investigation, not only the fault of the suspect, but also the correctness of the investigation.
          3. An investigator, a policeman, or a policeman is looking for a criminal. Find a number of suspects. And based on the data that they themselves received ...
          Question: Judge condemned - is he to blame?
          the prosecutor proved - is he to blame?
          the investigator led the investigation - is he to blame?
          the suspect admitted that he is a maniac - is he GUILTY?
          At least in one stage, a jamb, and that’s it: a man is a dead man.
          And to ask relatives is Lynch’s court.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. BLOND
            BLOND 23 November 2015 16: 30 New
            +1
            you greatly simplified ...
            and about relatives - God forbid you to be a victim, a victim or their relatives
  6. inkass_98
    inkass_98 23 November 2015 06: 59 New
    17
    And many have already begun to speak out in such a way that if they had not bombed in Syria, then everything would have been normal. And their rest and all that would not have suffered.

    When two planes from Domodedovo blew up a suicide bomber, they had never heard of ISIS. So our bombing of thugs has nothing to do with it. As the war with shaggy scumbags went, so it goes. I don’t really like Ramzan, but he had the right ideas - the execution of terrorists and the joint responsibility of their relatives so that they would not forget to educate the kids. The British quickly stopped terrorist acts in Afghanistan at one time by wrapping the killed terrorists in pork skins - what’s not the method? Fuck them, not paradise with the gurus, the shaitan will wait for them instead of Allah.
  7. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 November 2015 07: 02 New
    +8
    They do not cancel the moratorium just because in the West they threaten with a finger apparently.
    Why not quietly bring down the terrorists right in the colony. Sits on paper, but in fact in paradise?
    Or are some higher ranks afraid of losing a feeder called "prisoners"?
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 23 November 2015 15: 26 New
      +2
      Quote: chikenous59
      Why not quietly bring down terrorists right in the colony

      Silently not necessary! There should be a clear and precise SENTENCE, not gang warfare!
  8. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 23 November 2015 07: 10 New
    +8
    And what do we need this advice from Geyropa for?
    A moratorium on a moratorium! And even better - just do it to cancel. And write articles, not just terrorism.
    And without terrorists, there’s enough who to put against the wall in an open field.
  9. Alexdark
    Alexdark 23 November 2015 07: 18 New
    +2
    What, what, and even a terrorist, this is the last person who will care about death ... So this does not make sense. But the execution must be! The man in the first comment painted everything perfectly.
  10. sa-ag
    sa-ag 23 November 2015 07: 33 New
    +2
    And what kind of terrorism, and theft on an especially large scale?
  11. Balamyt
    Balamyt 23 November 2015 07: 34 New
    +6
    Here I typed in the vast network, a list of crimes for which they are being shot in China.
    1) high treason;
    2) Separatism;
    3) Armed riots and riots;
    4) Transition to the enemy camp
    5) Espionage;
    6) Selling abroad by means of ransom, extortion, blackmail and other illegal methods of obtaining secrets and information of national importance;
    7) Bribery by the enemy;
    8) Criminal negligence resulting in a fire;
    9) Criminal negligence resulting in a flood;
    10) Criminal negligence resulting in an explosion;
    11) Criminal negligence entailing the release of toxic substances;
    12) Criminal negligence threatening public safety;
    13) Damage to vehicles;
    14) Damage to transport communications;
    15) Damage to power equipment;
    16) Damage to flammable or explosive equipment;
    17) Capture of aircraft;
    18) Illegal production, purchase and sale, transportation, mailing of firearms, ammunition and explosives;
    19) Illegal acquisition and sale, transportation of nuclear materials;
    20) Theft of small arms, ammunition, explosives;
    21) Robbery of small arms, ammunition, explosives;
    22) Production, sale of poisoned or harmful food;
    23) Production, sale of fake drugs;
    24) Smuggling of weapons and ammunition;
    25) Smuggling of nuclear materials;
    26) Smuggling of counterfeit currency;
    27) Smuggling of cultural property;
    28) Smuggling of precious metals;
    29) Smuggling of rare species of animals and objects from them;
    30) Smuggling of ordinary types of goods and material assets;
    31) Smuggling of solid waste;
    32) Production of fake banknotes;
    33) Stock fraud;
    34) Fraud with bills;
    35) Fraud with financial instruments;
    36) Letter of credit fraud;
    37) Issuance of imaginary VAT checks in order to extract illegal profits from the return of export VAT, as well as non-payment of taxes and duties;
    38) Printing, selling fake VAT checks of a special statutory form;
    39) Intentional homicide;
    40) Intentional bodily harm;

    And how do you like ????
    This is not all, see the sequel ...
    1. paxil
      paxil 23 November 2015 07: 56 New
      +4
      Quote: Balamyt
      Here I typed in the vast network, a list of crimes for which they are being shot in China.

      So there are only 140 million of us and 1,5 billion of Chinese. The whole country falls under your list however wassat
      Criminal negligence entailing a fire Criminal negligence entailing a flood laughing
      1. paxil
        paxil 23 November 2015 07: 58 New
        -1
        A man set fire to his grass once and to the wall am
        1. SibSlavRus
          SibSlavRus 23 November 2015 11: 40 New
          0
          If the consequences of arson will be like in April in Khakassia, then yes!
          Or even just with dead or irreparable damage.
        2. Old old
          Old old 24 November 2015 21: 58 New
          0
          [quote] A man set fire to his grass once and to the wall / quote]
          The peasant burned the village, people died, the survivors lost their property, what is now to give the prize to the peasant?
      2. Balamyt
        Balamyt 23 November 2015 08: 15 New
        +4
        This is just a list of criminal acts. I do not propose to stupidly copy it into our laws! This is the first reason, THINK !!! And do not stupidly copy the notorious European values!
        1. SibSlavRus
          SibSlavRus 23 November 2015 11: 35 New
          +2
          Maybe then there will be more than 145 million people, if we start to think about the consequences of acts and budget money instead of keeping killers and other trash, we will be given to support decent people and deeds.
      3. Old old
        Old old 24 November 2015 21: 51 New
        0
        Criminal negligence resulting in a fire

        Tell those who perished in Lame Horse, shopping centers and in Khakassia, and cheerful little face is not forgotten!
        Criminal negligence resulting in a flood

        Flooding in Krymsk and the Far East - is there a reason for you to have fun? Who are you?
  12. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 November 2015 07: 34 New
    -3
    Quote: BLOND
    I am for the death penalty!
    - terrorism
    - treason
    - theft in especially large ...
    - child abuse
    (maybe not all listed)
    Suppose with a delay of a year or two (you never know who was illegally convicted, appeal), but feed the enemy, maniac, traitor ...

    First you need to calculate everything, how much is spent on average for a prisoner, how much money he brings to the treasury.
    It may be more profitable to have slaves for life than to shoot them.
    It is clear that from an emotional point of view I want to execute them on the spot, but this is politics. There is no way without pragmatic calculation.
    1. KOH
      KOH 23 November 2015 08: 07 New
      +2
      They just sit there, what income is from them?
    2. BLOND
      BLOND 23 November 2015 08: 22 New
      +4
      You know, before, quite a large part of the criminal world did not know the Criminal Code of the USSR badly and did not go to "executing articles ..."
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Alexey Lesogor
      Alexey Lesogor 23 November 2015 11: 39 New
      +3
      First you need to calculate everything, how much is spent on average for a prisoner, how much money he brings to the treasury.
      It may be more profitable to have slaves for life than to shoot them.


      For food per day, one ZK is spent more money than for the nutrition of one student. And several times. It is impossible to force ZK to work. Only voluntarily. On life they take out only for a walk.
      Killed - guilty of death.Here also rapists, human traffickers, drug dealers and terrorists. I neglect murder by negligence, in a state of affect and the like - in such cases, the legislation should be flexible.
      1. SibSlavRus
        SibSlavRus 23 November 2015 11: 48 New
        +2
        And the principle and flexibility will, if you clearly define the concept of self-defense and self-defense, expand these concepts and remove the free interpretation at the discretion of the judiciary.
        And not that now, slurred and very tolerant of a criminal, a trial.
  13. Balamyt
    Balamyt 23 November 2015 07: 34 New
    +4
    Here is the end of this list ...
    41) Rape;
    42) Rape of minors;
    43) hostage taking;
    44) The abduction and sale of women and children;
    45) Robbery;
    46) Theft;
    47) Transfer of information on the method of committing a crime to other persons, incitement;
    48) Armed escape;
    49) Organization and assistance in an armed escape;
    50) The looting of ancient burials and places of archaeological importance;
    51) Looting the fossilized remains of ancient people, as well as the ancient flora and fauna;
    52) Smuggling, sale, transportation and production of narcotic substances;
    53) Organization of brothels and prostitution;
    54) Coercion to prostitution;
    55) Damage to military equipment, military installations, as well as military communications;
    56) Deliberate delivery of unsuitable military equipment or construction of unsuitable military installations;
    57) Theft of state funds and property;
    58) Bribery;
    59) Failure to obey orders in time of war;
    60) Concealment or knowingly false transmission of military information;
    61) Refusal to transfer military orders or falsification thereof;
    62) Surrender;
    63) Desertion from the front;
    64) Obstruction of military tasks;
    65) Desertion;
    66) Dissolving rumors and unrest in wartime;
    67) Theft or robbery of military equipment and material resources for military use;
    68) Illegal sale or transfer to use of military equipment to third parties;
    69) The mutilation, looting of the population in wartime.

    And how do you like it? I think that in Russia this list will not cause special objections!
    1. Alexdark
      Alexdark 23 November 2015 08: 19 New
      +1
      Too many points not pulling ... Robbery. Well, robbed from hunger stall, chtol execution? Plus execution, a responsible thing. But you cannot run away from slander. For bodily injury, killing execution. Also not good. There are moments in life when you can and injuries, you can bang. All kinds of bad people. But for this, it’s better to just sit. Again, everything happens in life, and not always, things like killing are bad. Of course, I mean, with an encroachment on your life, with other influences from any bastard. The Chinese do not care, there are a lot of them.
    2. Banshee
      23 November 2015 08: 21 New
      0
      Well, only if about prostitution ... And the rest - especially number 56, 57, 67,68.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 23 November 2015 08: 55 New
        +6
        Quote: Banshee
        Well, only if about prostitution ... And the rest - especially number 56, 57, 67,68.


        Vasiliev from such a "kondrat" grab! belay
    3. 1234567890
      1234567890 23 November 2015 21: 13 New
      0
      People live!
  14. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 November 2015 07: 39 New
    +5
    Quote: sa-ag
    And what kind of terrorism, and theft on an especially large scale?

    Do you think that officials will introduce the death penalty against themselves? I beg of you...
    Deputies of the State Duma cannot adopt a law prohibiting stealing officials of a lower rank))
    There will be no justice under capitalism in the form in which it is.
    The essence of capitalism is to rob sophisticatedly, covertly, to use cheap labor.
  15. NKVD
    NKVD 23 November 2015 07: 45 New
    +5
    I am for the death penalty. It is not permissible to keep terrorists in prison at the expense of Russian taxpayers. I am also for the death penalty of state robbers (Vasilyeva first in line), pedophiles and homosexuals.
    1. Alexdark
      Alexdark 23 November 2015 08: 28 New
      +3
      Right, but not all right. Sorry, homosexuals for what? Straight execution? Yes, do not care where someone slaughtered, not the highest punishment. Simply, if you give power to people like .... you. Yes, you, people with such radical proposals as the execution of pid ** rasts, you can also wait for the “execution of people with a non-Aryan head shape”, execution for the wrong clothes, for the wrong religion and so on. One must see the edges, and not fall into extreme radicalism. From there Hitler climbed out, and other garbage. This is far more dangerous than some kind of fagot.
  16. ibragim
    ibragim 23 November 2015 08: 03 New
    +4
    Quote: CON
    But is it not better to spend the money that is spent on maintenance (from the media I heard about 40000 rubles a month for one suicide bomber) for some good deeds, why the victims of these freaks should support them, no, I am for the death penalty for 5 years, for example, this is about if you made a mistake ...

    It’s pointless to properly feed these freaks, we pay taxes, and they are fed, it’s better to spend on children
  17. Super Black
    Super Black 23 November 2015 08: 18 New
    -1
    I am against. In our country, such a law can turn against anyone, by no means only against terrorists, only then you will not return human life. But real criminals (rapists, pedophiles, terrorists), and so, after being detained for life, do not live long. Usually, they "commit suicide" immediately.
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 23 November 2015 15: 35 New
      +1
      Quote: Super Black
      .In our country, such a law can turn against anyone

      This has not yet affected you personally!
  18. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 November 2015 08: 18 New
    -9
    Quote: CON
    They just sit there, what income is from them?

    What does it mean to just sit? All convicts work in zones, they do some kind of production. The most worthless stools, etc. do. Recently, a TV show showed a report on a certain area where a modern shoe production was opened. At least 50 pairs of shoes will be produced monthly. The prisoners there plow in full. Cost is lower than Chinese.
    1. KOH
      KOH 23 November 2015 08: 22 New
      +9
      Do not confuse ordinary prisoners with those who are serving life sentences ...
    2. gingerbread man 59
      gingerbread man 59 23 November 2015 10: 28 New
      +5
      Remember . suicide bombs that sit for life. they are in solitary confinement and they don’t work, we just keep them and feed them and there’s no fat from them
    3. 1234567890
      1234567890 23 November 2015 21: 24 New
      0
      All? Prisoners? Do they work? On the zones? 37th again!? GULAG !!?
      There are a few such zones. Many where the hell production is ruined, they sit and swell from idleness. I don’t know exactly how exactly now, but it’s hardly much better than 10 years ago.
  19. kuz363
    kuz363 23 November 2015 08: 32 New
    +5
    Why are deputies, the president, human rights defenders and others deciding on the death penalty? These are those who could not prevent the collapse of the USSR! Why can not people decide in a referendum? And at the same time membership in PACE and other talkative organizations?
    1. gingerbread man 59
      gingerbread man 59 23 November 2015 10: 32 New
      +2
      I'm all limbs for the referendum on the death penalty
  20. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 23 November 2015 08: 41 New
    +4
    We have long understood that Russia is not Europe. This is Russia. And run on about the European tucked to the detriment of their own security - is not it shameful?
    Not that it is shameful, but it seems to me that it is no longer permissible. “You” guys have their own wedding, and we have our own. And I do not care that “you” think about it. I have lived a life. But for children and grandchildren without wine killed, teeth break.
  21. arhitroll
    arhitroll 23 November 2015 08: 45 New
    -3
    Those who are promoting the death penalty are already bullied! She doesn’t need it, but they need them on the northern island and so that they plow and build for 16 hours. These scum are more afraid with their hands to work than death. From the economic side, they will pay for themselves. And the absence of the death penalty eliminates the human factor.
    Ten years later, it became clear that he was not a terrorist, but simply the local boss looked at his wife - then the released person comes to the accused’s apartment, and they go to the island.
    And so of course - there is no person no problem.
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 23 November 2015 09: 58 New
      +2
      What do you want to build on the far north island? hi
      1. Bashibuzuk
        Bashibuzuk 23 November 2015 10: 29 New
        +2
        And to see, people did not watch such a film - New Earth, called.
        It shows very well what the northern territories lead to. With the convicts.
  22. luxprofi
    luxprofi 23 November 2015 08: 47 New
    +1
    People, why are you so naive as small children. The Constitutional Court has banned the death penalty in Russia, even after the lifting of the moratorium. It is clear that all normal people, for the death penalty. Listen to the bear. The honey is against the cancellation. The Constitutional Court does not change its decisions.
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 23 November 2015 15: 43 New
      0
      Quote: luxprofi
      The Constitutional Court does not change its decisions.

      Above any constitutional court there is a popular referendum that can raise the question of changing the Constitution and generally resolve any vital issues. Remember the referendum of the inhabitants of Crimea on their future fate!
  23. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 23 November 2015 08: 51 New
    +1
    Indeed, there is nothing complicated in restoring capital punishment. As the decision was made to introduce a moratorium (to please Europe), just as quickly, deputies can make a decision to cancel the moratorium (this time based on our interests). Peskov had in mind, most likely, more of the same diplomatic aspects of such a decision + the inevitable dances of various NGOs.
  24. Dr dron
    Dr dron 23 November 2015 09: 01 New
    0
    And about the confiscation of property, there at the top, did not mention anything ?! Now, when this happens, I’ll start to believe that our government has “gotten better,” but for now cheap populism.
    And to all kinds of geeks, you need to apply a real MORATORIUM, just send it to the most harmful production, squeeze it to the fullest so that they themselves are bent soon, and even for the benefit of society, business ...
  25. sontinianin
    sontinianin 23 November 2015 09: 03 New
    0
    I am for the death penalty, although sitting for life is a torment !!! Well, or let the specialists train for them!
  26. Kalmar
    Kalmar 23 November 2015 09: 07 New
    0
    Quote: article
    Judgment and conclusion for those who encroach on the lives of our fellow citizens is a luxury that we cannot afford

    But this is a very bad idea, as for me. The desire to shoot a terrorist to death is understandable, but here's the catch: are we all sure that the person who is put against the wall is really a terrorist who deserves to be shot? For this, a court is needed: to weigh all the pros and cons and make an informed decision, execute or have mercy.

    The “no trial” option risks rapidly turning the fight against terrorism into profanity: why look for real bad uncles, if you can just catch bearded men somewhere, shoot them exemplary, and then talk about their alleged involvement in Al-Qaeda, ISIS and other similar structures. The Americans won such a scheme already fought with WMD in Iraq - has it become much safer in the world?
  27. Roust
    Roust 23 November 2015 09: 11 New
    +1
    Do not take prisoner!
  28. afrikanez
    afrikanez 23 November 2015 09: 14 New
    +3
    I'm afraid that the moratorium on the death penalty will not be lifted soon. Our liberals and pseudo-democrats are afraid for their skins. Indeed, much today in power is being done against the people and to the detriment of the country. And it is only necessary to introduce the UK for terrorism, so then it will not be difficult to get to them !!! Who will dig a grave for himself? angry Personally, I am for, with both hands, tired of this disgrace and lawlessness already !!!
  29. Fibrizio
    Fibrizio 23 November 2015 09: 22 New
    -2
    Do not remove. We are very well tied to international law, and have made many different obligations. Departure from them is fraught now. So it’s still doubtful.
    1. gingerbread man 59
      gingerbread man 59 23 November 2015 10: 02 New
      +3
      Yes, poop on these obligations we are sanctioned with a baton and we are observing theirs and moronic obligations, much more
  30. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 23 November 2015 09: 42 New
    +1
    keeping them in zones is generally stupid, because they continue to engage in recruitment there, and this is even more dangerous.
    1. Kalmar
      Kalmar 23 November 2015 11: 53 New
      0
      keeping them in zones is generally stupid, because they continue to recruit there

      What kind of zone is it that you can also engage in recruitment? It is necessary to put in such a strict regime in the colony that the patient did not have the opportunity to contact the outside world and recruit anyone.
  31. kirgudu
    kirgudu 23 November 2015 09: 50 New
    -1
    Abstained, because no item needed. Terrorists in themselves are suicide bombers, they go on it consciously. Help does not need them. But life imprisonment somewhere in the mines - this will be a good punishment.
  32. V.ic
    V.ic 23 November 2015 09: 53 New
    +3
    If a scumbag was tied up while attempting to carry out a terrorist attack, no lawyers are for him. Simplified legal proceedings and ... loop, as a worthy ending to a jackal of life. They tied a drug courier, took the gang’s “head”: to feed them their products in the cell, in a volume directly proportional to the degree of participation in the poisoning of the people. I went to fight for ISIS and then returned (also) hanging. First shares: in public, with the mandatory broadcasting of the process next in line for execution. To all relatives of the near circle of a scumbag, "loss of rights" (no, not in voting for "people's representatives" = in the absence of a pension, medical care at the state expense, admission to universities and other "goodies").
  33. brr1
    brr1 23 November 2015 09: 54 New
    0
    The death penalty as a punishment and edification is ineffective for the reason that the majority of those falling under these articles are either not friends with their head initially, or they should not be afraid of death for other reasons. This measure is effective as a preventive measure against the fact that these people in the future can do something similar. It's not a fact, after all, that they will always sit.
    But there is one huge BUT, our law enforcement and judicial system is in such a state that many innocent people will be shot. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce the following as insurance: if it is proved that someone was shot by mistake - to shoot the investigator, prosecutor and judge who worked in this case. This will be fair and correct.
  34. Decathlon
    Decathlon 23 November 2015 09: 55 New
    +5
    The dry language of numbers: how much does a cartridge for PM cost and how much does it cost taxpayers the maintenance of a life-sentenced prisoner ?! The savings are obvious! I do not want to feed scum ...
  35. iv-nord
    iv-nord 23 November 2015 10: 03 New
    +2
    The president gave the order - to find and punish! What kind of lifelong speech can a terrorist talk about? Destroy!
  36. Georg Shep
    Georg Shep 23 November 2015 10: 06 New
    +2
    Definitely without sentiment.
  37. Alexzora
    Alexzora 23 November 2015 10: 14 New
    +3
    the death penalty must be mandatory!
    the death penalty is not only for terrorists, it is a lot for anyone.
    only in a higher court. While a moratorium, chemical castration must be done! So as not to eat folk bread, sitting in a warm cell and scribbling memoirs, all for forced labor with a 12-hour working day (best of all for some uranium mines or to disassemble chemical ammunition).
  38. tol
    tol 23 November 2015 10: 14 New
    -2
    Quote: Penzuck
    Quote: hedgehog in the fog
    drugs spreading

    Children to execute too? which adults have bored?
    This is the whole problem in "network marketing." A drug addict “catches up” and lures others ... To buy the next dose, he “works” with the supplier ... Death is the last thing they think about. I think it is necessary to plant drug addicts. But the "wholesalers" ... the "manufacturers", those who are promoting ... This is where you need to work ..

    Labor colonies, with training
  39. 2s1122
    2s1122 23 November 2015 10: 20 New
    0
    All for the death penalty, then you need to collect signatures and, according to the law, send it to the government and the Supreme for consideration. And I wrote this for a reason, let's start the process
  40. meriem1
    meriem1 23 November 2015 10: 24 New
    +5
    I read only the title !!! Stupidly hang up for terror ... after closing the path to the "paradise heaps" by smearing pork fat and stuffing a penny into a known place .. AND PRIVATE !. It is necessary to break the hard link TERROR-Paradise with a bunch of virgins. And how many pa.da.li divorced, so much for their rotten teens the Lord did not have time to create a place to attach ..... DRAIN !!!
    1. Geo73
      Geo73 23 November 2015 17: 21 New
      0
      I thought about it. Relatives go to penal servitude for taking animals to pig farms, and take children to special boarding schools until they are 18 years old.
      To deprive all direct relatives of all property and housing by destruction, political rights for life and for hard labor on farms in Chelyabinsk
  41. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 November 2015 10: 25 New
    0
    Quote: Decathlon
    The dry language of numbers: how much does a cartridge for PM cost and how much does it cost taxpayers the maintenance of a life-sentenced prisoner ?! The savings are obvious! I do not want to feed scum ...

    Do not want, but you will)) And we will, because our guide does not read comments on the forums)
    1. gingerbread man 59
      gingerbread man 59 23 November 2015 10: 55 New
      0
      I wrote to the president’s website. let's all write on his website what are we for the death penalty and there will be millions of us
      1. SibSlavRus
        SibSlavRus 23 November 2015 17: 02 New
        0
        Decisions taken at the referendum are of the highest power and are valid indefinitely.

        A referendum is a form of public administration in which citizens express their opinion on the most important issues for the state: adoption of a constitution, abolition of the death penalty, construction of a nuclear power plant, etc. A plebiscite can be nationwide, as well as regional and local. This form of will of citizens is organized as necessary: ​​both at the initiative of state bodies and parties, as well as representatives of public associations and citizens.

        A referendum is appointed as issues arise that require a popular expression of will.
        Purpose. Necessary - to determine the conditions for the further development of society.

        It is necessary to take the initiative to hold a referendum and create an initiative referendum group of at least 100 people with the right to participate in an all-Russian referendum. The main task of the initiative group is to collect the necessary number of citizens' signatures in support of the referendum initiative.

        The decision to hold an all-Russian referendum is made by the President of the Russian Federation. Before making a decision, the president within ten days from the day he receives the necessary documents and materials sends them to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation with a request for appropriate verification. The Constitutional Court verifies compliance with the requirements stipulated by the Constitution, and within a month sends the President its decision on the merits of the issue, which is subject to immediate publication.

        If the Constitutional Court recognizes compliance with the constitutional requirements by the referendum initiators, the President appoints an all-Russian referendum no later than 15 days from the date of receipt of the Constitutional Court decision. The President issues a decree on the appointment of a referendum, in which he determines the date of its holding.
        1. SibSlavRus
          SibSlavRus 23 November 2015 17: 13 New
          +1
          Well, hereafter, it could very well happen “like in an election”. THE ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE WILL BE USED IN THE INTERESTS OF THE RULING REGIME.
          It is not excluded the use of a punitive apparatus against particularly dissatisfied ...
  42. chikenous59
    chikenous59 23 November 2015 10: 26 New
    +2
    Quote: 2s1122
    All for the death penalty, then you need to collect signatures and, according to the law, send it to the government and the Supreme for consideration. And I wrote this for a reason, let's start the process

    Let's run!)
    1. AdekvatNICK
      AdekvatNICK 23 November 2015 15: 49 New
      0
      laughing yeah, it's like a type said ..... "I would save the world, but I'm already in my pajamas"
  43. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 23 November 2015 10: 34 New
    +3
    Our mentality is such that we do not care. There was the death penalty in the USSR, and especially dangerous crimes were committed. People knew what awaited them and still went to the crime. And now there is no death penalty and the criminal, falling under a life sentence, still deep down hopes that he will be lucky someday, but he will be released ... You cannot give the murderer even the slightest thread of hope. Only life for life and death for death!
  44. Sergius 62
    Sergius 62 23 November 2015 11: 12 New
    -2
    I will express all opinion.
    The death penalty is a must! But.
    It is not all about international terrorism, but the cynicism and liberalism of officials at all levels. This is where the real terror of our people.
    Take for example our own, so to speak, homemade, fluffy terror from the filing of the current liberal government, as abortion !!!
    This is a real, giant, genocide TERROR! Who is punished for the murder of millions of Russian killed in the womb ??? None. And why?
    What they did wrong undead Vanechka and Tanechka. Well, I finally keep silent about mink-addiction and alcoholism. And how much world hysteria about the killed peaceful sinners and already living children! For this, the whole world must unite and avenge 200,300 or five hundred people .. And for the millions of unborn who will avenge? I know who the Lord is!
    Terrorism is a seed in comparison with the mass dominant evil on our earth, such as the sin of murder in the womb and the corruption of the young generation by idleness, immorality, lack of principle and permissiveness to sin.
    That's where the root of evil is! And the media, as if spellbound, scream, resent and cry across Paris. Every day on our land in Russia thousands of times more are killed and NO ONE cries or shouts: "Catch and execute!" This is how my dear compatriots!
    1. IRINA-IRINA
      IRINA-IRINA 4 December 2015 22: 23 New
      0
      Abortion should be fought not by the introduction of punishment, but by increasing the medical literacy of the population.
  45. serezhasoldatow
    serezhasoldatow 23 November 2015 11: 33 New
    -1
    For terrorists, it is not necessary at the state level to introduce the death penalty-ugly. It is necessary to give a command-not to take prisoner and that’s all ...
    1. ALEA IACTA EST
      ALEA IACTA EST 23 November 2015 15: 50 New
      +1
      Quote: serezhasoldatow
      It is necessary to give a command-not to take prisoner and that’s all ...

      It’s not enough to cut the mushroom, you need to tear out the mycelium.
      Captivity - interrogation - a bullet in the back of the head.
      1. Geo73
        Geo73 23 November 2015 17: 14 New
        0
        It is captured. Undercover operational work!
  46. Lana liss
    Lana liss 23 November 2015 11: 34 New
    +5
    The terrorist who caused the death of innocent people, in fact, is the enemy who declared war on the state, and it should be judged by the laws of war - the death penalty. Definitely. Without the right of pardon.
    Maniac killers - there too! (They are not humans, and they shoot frantic and dangerous animals.)
    Other crimes - in severity.
    For corruption to award not only prison terms, but also the full payment of the stolen property, confiscation of property (real estate, shares, money accounts - regardless of location), including property of family members. Depriving the embezzler is automatically inviolable. And, most importantly, a ban on state service. Forever!
  47. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 23 November 2015 11: 35 New
    +3
    Briefly, I’m tired of watching this whole booth TWO LAWYERS both in the economy and in the criminal procedure sphere, there’s nothing to say about sand, the Kremlin is not interested, it doesn’t apply to the Kremlin, etc., etc. The Kremlin is not interested, but how the PEOPLE itself looks at the death penalty, if the Kremlin is practically not interested in everything, what is interesting to the PEOPLE is the question, but we need such a Kremlin. Here's a look at the interests of the Kremlin.
  48. The comment was deleted.
  49. Nonna
    Nonna 23 November 2015 11: 40 New
    +3
    92% of members of the forum are in favor of the death penalty. And so on all the forums. A lot of sites now conduct polls. The whole country - for the death penalty to terrorists (and their accomplices). And why does everyone mean only - ISIS. And the terrorists and Natsik from Ukraine. That's who you need to shoot without any trial. So it's time to hold a referendum in the country - and its outcome will be predictable. Tired of the liberal-oligarchic Government and most of the State Duma deputies acting to the detriment of the Russian people and Russia.
    1. WINovikov
      WINovikov 23 November 2015 12: 40 New
      0
      Nonna So it's time to hold a referendum in the country ...
      And who will allow such a referendum? "Guarantor", State Duma, Constitutional Court? Do not make people laugh.
  50. old rats
    old rats 23 November 2015 11: 41 New
    +4
    Quote: insafufa
    Let me be minus but I’ll say

    For any criminal, there is nothing better than the death penalty, since it is better to quickly get rid of suffering than a long painful life behind the wall in non-human conditions. Godina must be tormented to the end of her days in non-human conditions, having drunk her cup to the end. In Chechnya, I always had a grenade in my pocket so that the living would not be captured better than an easy death than a nightmare of captivity from militants.

    I am against lifting the moratorium on the death penalty

    Psychologists say that a person feels the discomfort of being behind bars only for the first 4 years, then the zone becomes truly a "home".
    1. AdekvatNICK
      AdekvatNICK 23 November 2015 16: 42 New
      0
      this probably does not apply to single cameras.