Military Review

UN Security Council adopted a resolution of France on the fight against ISIS unanimously

45
UN Security Council unanimously approved a resolution prepared by France on coordinating efforts in the fight against IS and Al-Qaida’s terrorists, reports RIA News Organization statement.




All 15 Board members voted for the document.

The resolution calls upon all UN member states to take, whenever possible, “all necessary measures, in accordance with international law, especially the UN Charter, as well as international human rights standards, refugee and humanitarian law, in the territory controlled by the IG in Syria and Iraq. "

The resolution also calls for “redoubling and coordinating its efforts to prevent and suppress terrorist acts committed directly by the IS, as well as by the Front al-Nusra and all other individuals, groups, enterprises and organizations associated with Al-Qaida.”

The document calls for “eradicating the safe haven that terrorists have created in large parts of Iraq and Syria” and recognizes the Front al-Nusra and other organizations associated with Al-Qaida as a “threat to international peace and security.”
Photos used:
AP Photo / Julie Jacobson
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. dorz
    dorz 21 November 2015 12: 33 New
    12
    The fried cock pecked ...
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 21 November 2015 12: 47 New
      19
      Quote: dorz
      The fried cock pecked ...

      And the multi-colored feathers were fluffed up ....))) Russia has already been given this to do ... and very effective! UN prostitute ...
      1. Sid.74
        Sid.74 21 November 2015 12: 51 New
        +9
        Less than two years ... fool
        1. Temples
          Temples 21 November 2015 13: 00 New
          14
          Many resolutions are adopted within the UN!
          Further actions will show who is capable of what.
          Who only accepts and signs resolutions, and who really destroys terrorists.
          So far, only Russia really destroys the enemy.

          How is it in European:
          “The terrorists are killing us!”
          - Want to talk about it?
          1. cniza
            cniza 21 November 2015 13: 19 New
            +5
            Quote: Temples
            Many resolutions are adopted within the UN!



            But there is no mechanism for their implementation and there is no control, they released steam, but where are the actions? while Russia alone is being blown away.
        2. 79807420129
          79807420129 21 November 2015 13: 24 New
          10
          Quote: Sid.74
          Less than two years ... fool

          Wait a while, as much will pass, now the bidding will begin who is all the most important and who is moderate and who is violent, as a result only Russia will work on real barmales.
      2. Reserve officer
        Reserve officer 21 November 2015 14: 16 New
        +3
        Accepted unanimously. And then a diverse interpretation of the provisions of the resolution will begin, and any vile political act from the Western masters will be precisely "in the spirit of the resolution." Just like the Minsk agreements.
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 21 November 2015 18: 40 New
      +1
      Quote: dorz
      The fried cock pecked ...


      I don’t know who and whom, and where I pecked, but against the background of the adoption of this toothless resolution, the Turks threaten us with a finger (that is, their UN resolutions, it turns out, do not concern).
      (cry.)
  2. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 21 November 2015 12: 35 New
    +7
    Quote: dorz
    The fried cock pecked ...

    No, he rather planted a geyrope, for the very tomatoes.
    1. Alexey Boukin
      Alexey Boukin 21 November 2015 12: 47 New
      10
      Today I learned from the media that the Baltic countries refused to participate in the fight against ISIS along with Russia. Greater insanity is impossible to come up with. But, the Baltic people in their repertoire ...
      1. yuriy55
        yuriy55 21 November 2015 13: 22 New
        +1
        ... that the Baltic countries refused to participate in the fight against ISIS along with Russia.


        Are they afraid that Russia will record all victories at its own expense?
        I don’t know what their repertoire is, but with us:
        ALLEGRO WITH FIRE
      2. Dryuya2
        Dryuya2 21 November 2015 16: 40 New
        +2
        Quote: alexey bukin
        Today I learned from the media that the Baltic countries refused

        Estonian. (Forbidden)
        2010 year
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 November 2015 13: 50 New
      +1
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      he rather planted a geyrope, for the very tomatoes.
      The paddlers played to the handle with tolerance, and now they suddenly discovered that multiculturalism turned out to be with dynamite!
      What they raised, they got it! Who should be offended now besides themselves, beloved ones? what
  3. Same lech
    Same lech 21 November 2015 12: 38 New
    +3
    UN Security Council unanimously endorses France’s resolution on coordination of efforts in the fight against IS and Al-Qaida terrorists


    Here are the Balts on the principle of frost-bitten ears in spite of grandmother refused to cooperate with RUSSIA in the fight against TERROR like KIEV ... really their ears are frostbitten.
    1. KnightRider
      KnightRider 21 November 2015 12: 46 New
      +4
      Quote: The same Lech
      In the Baltic states, on the principle of frostbite, my ears spitefully my grandmother refused to cooperate with RUSSIA in the fight against TERROR like KIEV ... their ears are really frostbitten.

      Yeah, without the Baltic “tigers” we won’t be able to beat any igli ... Damn, who do they think they are? crying laughing
      1. 3officer
        3officer 21 November 2015 12: 49 New
        +5
        Yes, we are on them ... not much and counted laughing It will be difficult of course without them, but fool
      2. win
        win 23 November 2015 00: 08 New
        +2
        without the Baltic “tigers” we won’t be able to beat any igil

        It will be difficult of course without them


        Estonia could help.
        She has “aircraft carriers,” only soooooooo small (see the military parade of 2015 in Narva)
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 November 2015 13: 54 New
      +1
      Quote: The same Lech
      like Kiev ... really their ears are frostbitten.
      If only the ears - so it’s not so bad!
      I'm afraid that, together with their ears, they and the brains froze!
      And this is serious ...
  4. 3officer
    3officer 21 November 2015 12: 38 New
    +4
    If Russia proposed, they would fundamentally reject stop
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. KnightRider
    KnightRider 21 November 2015 12: 43 New
    +5
    Operation Retribution
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 21 November 2015 18: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: KnightRider
      Operation Retribution


      From the French side:
      (cry.)
  7. Sasha_Bykov
    Sasha_Bykov 21 November 2015 12: 43 New
    +6
    if there was a resolution from Russia, then we would not see such unanimity
    1. Stinger
      Stinger 21 November 2015 13: 02 New
      +5
      Sure. Who will vote for the insidious resolution proposed by the cunning Putin - the most dangerous, along with Ebola fever, aggressive aggressor. After all, he suggested that: before climbing with your feet and bombs into a sovereign country, you need to coordinate your actions with it. Horror! This is contrary to all conceivable democratic norms.
  8. Barakuda
    Barakuda 21 November 2015 12: 44 New
    +5
    In order for France to change its mind, it took a bunch of innocent victims. And who will answer? Now they are making a sacrifice. Type not aisles.
    Finally, the voice of Russia was heard, albeit in this way.
    Depardieu fled, Kadyrov presented an apartment in Grozny. It’s time for the French to think. Merkel at the same time.
    1. kaprizV
      kaprizV 21 November 2015 12: 54 New
      +2
      This is not for you !!! This is EUROBEBELISM !!!
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 21 November 2015 14: 07 New
        +3
        Quote: kaprizV
        This is not for you !!! This is EUROBEBELISM !!!

        You think ...
  9. Urals
    Urals 21 November 2015 12: 50 New
    +2
    I do not believe that they thought better of it, there is still a catch. no
  10. Tusv
    Tusv 21 November 2015 12: 52 New
    +4
    I am not Paris, but Everything is legal. IGO, although not recognized, but a caliphate. The act of aggression is confirmed and by no means a test tube with washing powder. So 51 article of the UN concerning France absolutely works lawfully
  11. moskowit
    moskowit 21 November 2015 12: 54 New
    +1
    Well, they begin to move. Well done our president, stirred up this European standing swamp!
  12. Dezinto
    Dezinto 21 November 2015 12: 59 New
    +9
    oooooooooooooooooooooo! insight?

    Two years "fought" .... and here on you .... resolution!

    List of countries that bombed sand in the desert for two years:

    The list of states included in the anti-terrorist coalition consists of Albania, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iraq , Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Lithuania, Latvia, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, India, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, South Korea, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, U Krajins, UAE and Great Britain.

    The result we all know.







    1. Tusv
      Tusv 21 November 2015 13: 57 New
      0
      Quote: DEZINTO
      List of countries that bombed desert sand for two years

      Instructions for "partners"

      When approaching the bear’s den, take a large stick. Grow her and grease her face with excrement. Where from? Believe - it will be in excess

      Follow this axiom, "partners" literally - We will grow up and will "fragrant". When they guess that the bear needs a lair, honey and raspberries, and not a fig, not a manicure
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 21 November 2015 18: 49 New
      +2
      Quote: DEZINTO
      List of countries that bombed sand in the desert for two years:


      And here is what the Americans themselves say about the bombing by their military:
      (cry.)
  13. dvg79
    dvg79 21 November 2015 13: 05 New
    +1
    ISIS will erase this resolution by hiding from our airstrikes.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 21 November 2015 14: 19 New
      +1
      Quote: dvg79
      ISIS will erase this resolution by hiding from our airstrikes.

      Also - application ...
      However, it (among other things!) Is designed to legalize those who seek democracy bombing targets on the territory of the SAR.
      The French - oil rigs, Turkey - Kurds, the Yankees - SSA units ...
      So now everything is legal! By UN resolution! Invitations / permissions from the legitimate Syrian government are no longer required!
  14. Turk
    Turk 21 November 2015 13: 10 New
    +1
    Quote: The same Lech
    UN Security Council unanimously endorses France’s resolution on coordination of efforts in the fight against IS and Al-Qaida terrorists


    Here are the Balts on the principle of frost-bitten ears in spite of grandmother refused to cooperate with RUSSIA in the fight against TERROR like KIEV ... really their ears are frostbitten.

    And ISIS in the know? laughing Probably breathed a sigh of relief.
  15. severbob
    severbob 21 November 2015 13: 12 New
    +1
    coalitions will not be not all speak Russian speak maybe UN troops will go to occupy one redoubt
    1. Stinger
      Stinger 21 November 2015 13: 25 New
      +1
      This is not the case. If the legitimate government of Assad wins, guess three times who the Syrian people will choose. Oh bad. Therefore, the coalition will bend towards the states. Although, of course, they still have a run-in option - to hold "democratic" elections with a predictable outcome.
  16. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 21 November 2015 13: 16 New
    0
    Yes, all this - waving fists after a fight. How will they really fight the terrorists when they have made such a mess? Until they rein in their muslims, they will not force them to accept the culture of the country in which they live. Do you want to wear a hijab? Wear it to your health at home. And on European streets - walk like everyone else, or sit at home. Geyropa played in multiculturalism, it turned out the other way around. Muslim culture invades cities.
  17. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 21 November 2015 13: 18 New
    +2
    The resolution says, will eradicate a safe shelter. And where did the Ishilovites lick their wounds after Russian air strikes? To Turkey, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Qatar. They ran to their mother's house. What will the UN say?
  18. lehalk
    lehalk 21 November 2015 13: 38 New
    +1
    I propose in this resolution. Deal, Multiply and Strengthen the resolution to the full depth of unexpected tasks that have arisen!
  19. Barakuda
    Barakuda 21 November 2015 13: 42 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexander 3
    What will the UN say to this?

    Nichrome will not say. The office has outlived itself. A couple of three players remain - the USA, Russia, China .. what
  20. Mirrorfax
    Mirrorfax 21 November 2015 13: 42 New
    +1
    Yes, it’s high time to disperse this bunch of useless parasites so that they don’t fart with the brain, do not spoil the air in vain, and ... clever smart resolutions were not popped.
  21. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 21 November 2015 14: 10 New
    +1
    Like the resolution of France, so unanimously. And as Russia proposes drastic and real measures, so duplicitous against!
  22. Belarus
    Belarus 21 November 2015 14: 24 New
    0
    In my opinion, at least half of the wording is vague and a little specific. Well, for example: nothing is said about the financing of terrorists.
    as well as international human rights standards, refugee and humanitarian law, in the territory under the control of the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq. ”

    This is how and who will do it? If there is no coordination between the Russian Federation and America, then how can different kinds of disagreements and frictions be avoided?

    I don’t know how anyone, but I have this resolution raises more questions than answers.
  23. DPN
    DPN 21 November 2015 14: 58 New
    0
    These Frogs themselves turned their former colonies and they were to hell. While these Frogs were not given MORDA, it seems they decided to receive dividends.
  24. viktor561
    viktor561 21 November 2015 16: 28 New
    0
    Yes, it would be better if they drove us 100 lards and removed their pocket terrorists - and our best ally, the Army and Navy - we can handle
  25. Lelek
    Lelek 21 November 2015 18: 09 New
    0
    (The resolution also calls for "redoubled and coordinated efforts to prevent and suppress terrorist acts committed directly by the Islamic State, as well as Front al-Nusra and all other individuals, groups, enterprises and organizations affiliated with Al-Qaida." )

    DOUBLE is how? If before that no efforts were made, then the doubled result will be all the same no (0x2 = 0). IMHO, the resolution is not binding on anything (although in the article there is only an “extract”, but let's see what happens next).
  26. Wild_grey_wolf
    Wild_grey_wolf 22 November 2015 11: 29 New
    +1
    what they started to adopt, resolutions. . . you see in a couple of years they’ll think of something else.
  27. Olegater
    Olegater 22 November 2015 19: 12 New
    0
    And our country, through its representative at the UN, esteemed V. Churkin, presented this: “This week, the Russian delegation submitted to the Third Committee of the UN General Assembly a draft resolution on combating the glorification of Nazism, racism, neo-Nazism and other manifestations of xenophobia and attempts to whitewash extremist movements. The draft resolution was supported by 126 UN states during the vote. 53 delegations, including delegations from several countries "The EU decided to abstain. Four states spoke out against the draft resolution, three of which voted in the same way during the consideration of past resolution options. It's about the USA, Canada and Ukraine." the fourth is some kind of misunderstanding called palau (to be honest, I don’t even know where it is). And the frogmen crowed something there, they all immediately accepted. Why is that? After all, our proposal is to have the character of a more serious and future-oriented warning. My subjective opinion is that the shooting of their citizens is all provocation by very influential forces. And France acts as an example of something. And thus, by the hands of the Hvrants, they are the shadow workers, it is necessary to do something or to slander RUSSIA.