Work has begun on a new defense plan.

35
16 November, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree introducing a new defense plan. In accordance with this document, which entered into force at the time of signing, from 1 in January 2016, the implementation of the new Defense Plan of the Russian Federation will begin, which will be valid until 2020. The new Defense Plan will be a replacement for the previous similar document adopted in January 2013 of the year and calculated up to 2016.

The presidential decree was the first step in the implementation of the latest instructions. During the November 13 meeting, V. Putin announced the need to adjust and clarify key military planning documents, such as the Defense Plan. The main reason for this is the changing situation in the international arena, as well as the heightened threat of international terrorism. The updated Defense Plan and other documents developed within its framework should be the answer to new threats.

During a recent meeting, the president recalled that the first stories The country's defense plan was adopted at the beginning of 2013, and stipulated the main features of the state’s defense strategy. This document identifies potential risks and threats to the security of the state, as well as identifies the main actions in key areas, such as the development of the armed forces, mobilization training, etc. In addition, the range of tasks of certain departments was determined. The first defense plan was calculated for 2013-16 years. In the near future, the implementation of the second version of this document will begin.

Work has begun on a new defense plan.


According to reports, a defense plan for the 2016-20 years has not yet been developed. Domestic media report that a new plan will be developed by December of this year. Upon completion of the development, at the beginning of next year, the Defense Plan will be adopted for implementation. In the future, it seems, a new plan will be developed, in accordance with which the defense of the country will be built at the beginning of the next decade.

A new defense plan has not yet been developed. In addition, part of the documents of the plan is not subject to publication. Because of this, at the moment the main features of the new plan remain unknown, and it remains only to try to predict exactly what changes in the situation will be taken into account in the documents. The press and experts make predictions on this topic, but official confirmations or refutations will appear much later.

Some publications recall recent statements by the president, and also try to “link” them with the news about the new Defense Plan. For example, the TASS news agency recalls that during a recent meeting on the development of the armed forces, V. Putin once again raised the topic of foreign missile defense systems. The head of state expressed his intention to continue creating his own missile defense systems, but noted that it was planned to pay attention to strike systems first. Such weapons, according to the president, should be able to overcome any means of defense of a potential enemy.

V.Putin also reminded that the real goal of building a Euro-Atlantic missile defense system is the desire of the United States and its allies to neutralize Russian strategic nuclear forces. In response, Russia must develop its nuclear triad and other means of ensuring strategic security.

Such statements by the president may indicate that the updated Defense Plan will take into account recent changes in the situation with foreign missile defense systems and other features of the situation in the field of strategic weapons and strategic security. Naturally, the details of this part of the Defense Plan remain unknown. Moreover, the relevant documents at the moment may not be ready.

TASS also recalls the words of V. Putin concerning the development of the armed forces through the supply of new materiel. The president urged to catch up and get rid of the problems that have plagued the army and defense industry since the nineties. At a certain period of the country's modern history, the armed forces and the defense industry were left without the necessary funding, which led to corresponding negative consequences. Now it is proposed to pay the necessary attention to these areas and restore the necessary situation.

The President stressed that the country will not be drawn into any arms race and is not going to “catch up and overtake” anyone. Nevertheless, it is necessary to catch up at the turn of the nineties and the two thousandth, getting rid of problems that still make themselves known.

According to some reports, the current Defense Plan for 2013-16 provided for some measures to develop the defense industry and re-equip the armed forces. It can be argued that one of the sections of the new plan will be devoted to various aspects of the development of defense enterprises, the creation of new projects, etc. For obvious reasons, the details of such plans will not be published in full in the foreseeable future.

It can also be assumed that one of the main themes of the new Defense Plan will be the fight against terrorist organizations. Various such formations attempt to hold their “shares” in different countries, as a result of which a large number of people die. Because of this, such threats should be taken into account in the new strategy, especially after the true causes of the crash of the airliner over the Sinai Peninsula were established.

A potential threat to a country's security, which should also be taken into account when planning, is open and “frozen” conflicts in close proximity to Russian borders. First of all, it is a civil war in Ukraine. In addition, certain risks may be associated with disputed territories in several other regions.

The question of the expansion of NATO eastward and the regular holding of exercises near the borders of Russia remain relevant. The buildup of a NATO group in Eastern Europe has long been a cause for criticism and fear, since it represents a certain danger to Russian interests. At the same time, the events of recent years, especially those taking place against the backdrop of the current deterioration of the international situation, clearly indicate that the NATO leadership intends to continue the implementation of its plans.

According to recent reports, the Ministry of Defense and related organizations will prepare a new Defense Plan for the 2016-20 years in the next few weeks. The development of this document will be completed in December, and it will take effect on January 1. For several reasons, the details of this plan are still unknown and it remains only to speculate on this point. Perhaps some of the provisions of the plan will be published in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, even without a wide publication, the new Defense Plan will become a key element of strategic security for the next few years.


On the materials of the sites:
http://tass.ru/
http://ria.ru/
http://vz.ru/
http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    19 November 2015 06: 22
    So let's see what the doctrine and priority areas for the development of our army will be in the light of new threats and a change in the world order as a whole hi
    1. +11
      19 November 2015 07: 49
      Nevertheless, it is necessary to catch up on the turn nineties and two thousand years, getting rid of the problems that make themselves felt so far.

      But is it not time to revise some of the articles in the Constitution, especially the ones regarding rule of law over national law, imposed on us by tips from the State Department while Russia was weak and Boris was in the next spree? And then you see, the problem is 50 billion pseudo-debt the so-called Yukos shareholders would self-destruct.
      1. +5
        19 November 2015 08: 00
        Quote: subbtin.725
        Nevertheless, it is necessary to catch up on the turn nineties and two thousand years, getting rid of the problems that make themselves felt so far.

        But is it not time to revise some of the articles in the Constitution, especially the ones regarding rule of law over national law, imposed on us by tips from the State Department while Russia was weak and Boris was in the next spree? And then you see, the problem is 50 billion pseudo-debt the so-called Yukos shareholders would self-destruct.




        A defense plan is a document that must be in operation constantly and quickly react to changes in the actions of our "partners".
      2. 0
        19 November 2015 09: 06
        Have you voted for the referendum?
        And then everyone is talking about changing the Constitution, but how can it be initiated if you do not get the right number of votes?
      3. 0
        19 November 2015 15: 13
        Yes, it seems that the State Duma was going to adopt a law on the supremacy of decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation over global laws. Of course, it’s not enough, but maybe it will move.
      4. -3
        19 November 2015 17: 32
        Quote: subbtin.725
        But is it not time to review some of the articles in the Constitution, especially with regard to the supremacy of global law over national law,

        In no case should this be done. The primacy of international law over national law must always be and everyone must comply with this principle. This is the basis, the basis of the theory of state and law. No one will take seriously a country where the principle of the primacy of international law is absent. The Russian Federation must show that international agreements for it are above national legislation and that the Russian Federation will fulfill its international obligations in good faith. An international agreement for the state is a "word" that the state gives and must keep it, otherwise you will be a "windbag" And if so, the government of the Russian Federation should very thoughtfully work out all its international agreements !!!!!! If any international norm of a universal, regional nature puts the Russian Federation in an unfavorable position, such a norm can be denounced.
        1. 0
          19 November 2015 19: 11
          Well, what is the difference? The rule of law puts it in a "disadvantageous position" and we will denounce it - want to - cancel it? Isn't it easier to be honest - We have our own laws, you have yours, period! What if they are THERE agree to a law on the protection of pedophiles or the legalization of marriages among zoophiles? And what, we obey International Law ???
          1. 0
            23 November 2015 10: 26
            Quote: m262
            Well, what is the difference? The rule of law puts it in a "disadvantageous position" and we will denounce it - want to - cancel it?

            First, you need to study this norm in detail before ratifying it. and you can denounce it if other parties do not fulfill the conditions. How was it with START 2
            Quote: m262
            Isn't it easier honestly - We have our own laws, you have your own!

            No, it’s not easier. How the two countries will regulate their relations based on their nat. legislation, if they differ from each other ??? How??? International agreements are needed for this.
            Quote: m262
            Suddenly they are there to agree to the law on the protection of pedophiles or the legalization of marriages of bestiality? And what, do we obey International Law ???

            They will agree, but if the Russian Federation does not join this norm, for it this norm has no power, that's all.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          19 November 2015 23: 36
          The United States lays down on "world law" and feels great! I haven’t heard that anyone was running into them about this, on the contrary, since the United States decided that everyone was running to do it right there, so it’s not good ...
          1. 0
            23 November 2015 10: 29
            Quote: max702
            The United States lays down on "world law" and feels great! I haven’t heard that anyone was running into them about this, on the contrary, since the United States decided that everyone was running to do it right there, so it’s not good.

            Yes, they did ... but as soon as their military-political potential weakens, they will remember this matter. Let it be crooked, but MP norms create at least some kind of barrier for the USA. albeit funny but the US should come up with excuses. and without MP, their hands will be completely untied, on the basis of national legislation
            1. 0
              14 January 2016 17: 06
              Cat Basilio, you remember my friend song, you and I will not have to live at that time. If we believe that Russia is a great power, then we must behave with dignity, let the descendants understand, something we all in good conscience, they put on us, take the Baltic states, all their life they were under someone's protectorate, so no, they spit on us with top shelf. You need to crush your authority.
      5. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      19 November 2015 19: 35
      And what could be a military doctrine without state ideology? Leaves grow on branches, and those on a tree winked Somehow, first in space, you need to decide where what grows from. This is not just "Phobos - soil" for you! So, with sad irony. hi
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. +3
    19 November 2015 06: 31
    Any plan requires adjustment. And as regards the Defense Plan, it is simply necessary.
    I hope it will not be worse.
  3. +1
    19 November 2015 06: 44
    The fact that the trends around Russia have changed in a bad way is also visible to the naked eye. In the new Plan, these trends should be leveled. The question is whether the Plan and the Economy are in time for the Plan. Just have to be in time !!!
    1. +1
      19 November 2015 09: 22
      Quote: staryivoin
      The fact that the trends around Russia have changed in a bad way is also visible to the naked eye. In the new Plan, these trends should be leveled. The question is whether the Plan and the Economy are in time for the Plan. Just have to be in time !!!

      One gets the impression that both TASS, the author, and some forum users accept the National Security Strategy and the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation as the Defense Plan.
      A plan is specific activities based on what is available.
      1. +1
        19 November 2015 22: 49
        Quote: An64
        The National Security Strategy and the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation. The plan is specific measures based on what is available.
        To put it simply, TC "on the fingers":
        National Security Strategy - determines the ideal target model, ensuring the state of public protection from external and internal threats. It includes the whole spectrum of relations: mn relations, unions, coalitions, prospects for the development of science, technology, production, agricultural production, etc., to ensure everything necessary for the country's security. (Ex: food b / o, technological, medicines, etc.)
        Military doctrine - a system of views of the leadership of the state on the preparation of the country and its armed forces for war, on the problems of war / peace.
        Defense plan - specific measures to provide the Armed Forces with weapons systems, preparation of the country (economy, society), development of defense infrastructure. Here are specific indicators for time, resources and performers.
        This is extremely simplified to understand the essence.
  4. +2
    19 November 2015 06: 45
    The industry needs to be restored (not a screwdriver assembly), then many problems will be solved along the way. good
  5. +2
    19 November 2015 06: 48
    "V. Putin also recalled that the real goal of building a Euro-Atlantic missile defense system is the desire of the United States and its allies to neutralize Russian strategic nuclear forces. In response, Russia must develop its nuclear triad and other means of ensuring strategic security."- here, the most IM in the hole, by their most unwillingness!
    1. +1
      19 November 2015 08: 52
      In the same steppe:


      Question to the American:
      - Why don’t you like Russians so much?
      -You understand, they have a lot of complexes ...
      - Well, and for what reason are they the most complex?
      -You don’t understand me .., anti-aircraft missile systems ...
  6. 0
    19 November 2015 06: 59
    I know something is late in VO about the plan since Monday.
  7. 0
    19 November 2015 07: 13
    No matter how much the liberals of the fifth column whined, but the peoples of the planet have a saying to this, those who do not want to feed their army will feed a foreign army, with the ensuing consequences.
    1. +1
      19 November 2015 22: 57
      Quote: PTS-m
      and the peoples of the planet have a saying to it ,,,, who does not want to feed his army, he will feed someone else’s army ,,,

      Actually, this expression is attributed to the French emperor Napoleon. Yes
  8. 0
    19 November 2015 07: 15
    Article is nonsense! How can it be that there is a Decree, but no Plan ?????? !!!!
    In the Ministry of Defense and in the Presidential Administration that they’re completely stupid or something !!!! ????
  9. +1
    19 November 2015 07: 21
    It's time, like Israel, to destroy our enemies anywhere in the world!
  10. 0
    19 November 2015 07: 50
    The most effective defense is electronic warfare and more - then not a single missile or plane will cross our border !!! Yes
    the ships will be on oars, in the place of tanks - bicycles - that's something like that. lol
    Well, if they cross the border on foot - I propose to turn it on at maximum volume - the Russian anthem !!! good
    I think the effect will be amazing ... wassat
    Well, in conclusion - orderlies in white coats for the mentally vulnerable "warriors" - after all, after the incident with "Cook" - everyone already understood how timid they were - poor fellows ... crying
    1. +1
      19 November 2015 23: 02
      Quote: Conscience
      The most effective defense is electronic warfare and more - then not a single missile or plane will cross our border !!!

      Yes nuuuu !!!!
      You, this ... tell us about EW Ballistic missile, okay? laughing
  11. hartlend
    +2
    19 November 2015 08: 12
    Quote: Viscount
    Article is nonsense! How can it be that there is a Decree, but no Plan ?????? !!!!
    In the Ministry of Defense and in the Presidential Administration that they’re completely stupid or something !!!! ????

    It is not appropriate for you to write about nonsense, if you yourself write illiterate.
  12. +1
    19 November 2015 08: 18
    The country’s defense plan should include a mobilization component for the operation of enterprises for the production of military and technical equipment in a special period. At one time I drew up such a plan for enterprises of the USSR Ministry of Radio Industry. Then he conducted staff exercises and we looked to see if we could continue the release of military hardware in a special period. Government and Customers evaluated the results. I have the honor.
  13. +1
    19 November 2015 08: 55
    So far, all this is still wagging on the water. There will be a document and it will be possible to discuss it. Now what to talk about?
  14. +1
    19 November 2015 09: 18

    According to reports, the Defense Plan for 2016-20 has not yet been developed

    The plan has not been developed, so there is nothing to discuss. In the morning - money, in the evening - chairs.
  15. +1
    19 November 2015 10: 05
    Dear author, the regulatory legal act, which in this case is the Decree of the President, cannot be introduced not developed plan. As well as other acts of lower management level. It is like putting a signature on an empty sheet of paper, considering that after some time a document will be written on it.
  16. 0
    19 November 2015 10: 16
    The right thing. Threats and risks need to be adjusted. The ways and means of resolving them have changed due to the emergence of new types of weapons. I would emphasize the mobilization component. In particular, to prepare the mob. reserve.
  17. -1
    19 November 2015 12: 20
    The defense plan should include a provision that in the event of an attack on Russia, the aggressor country will not only be driven back within its geographical borders, but also completely destroyed ... The nature of the war will not only be defensive. but also offensive ... With automatic inclusion in the Russian Federation.
  18. 0
    19 November 2015 12: 25
    Good time of the day!
    Nadeus in the plan will reflect the new realities of modern geopolitics.
    For example, the war with the Wahhabis, terrorist attacks against the Russian government, the current power
    Russia in Syria.
    1. +1
      19 November 2015 23: 25
      Quote: marinier
      Nadeus in the plan will reflect the new realities of modern geopolitics.

      Do not confuse the plan (task execution paper) with a national security strategy. The levels are different: Conceptual and subject-real: with timelines, objects, resources, performers ...
  19. +1
    19 November 2015 12: 47
    Call it "Offensive Plan", we will play on our partners' nerves. laughing
  20. -4
    19 November 2015 12: 58
    Work has begun on a new Defense Plan ..

    Well, that means we will be delayed for a long time at the enterprise.
    I just noticed one tendency .... how Crimea was taken immediately became worse ... then how the Donbass exploded it got even worse .... after Syria there was a disaster .... it's just probably a coincidence.
    1. 0
      19 November 2015 15: 20
      If our rulers themselves were not part of the currency and other speculators, thought about the country, and not about their friends and godfathers, perhaps what you write about and wouldn’t be there. Alas, we must go to the polls and not indulge in a beerman, if you don’t want to vote for anyone, spoil the ballot, but no one will vote for you.
    2. +1
      19 November 2015 23: 33
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      Just noticed one trend .... how

      oil fell in price, sanctions were imposed, and there was no budgetary filling ...
      And where are the Crimea, Donbass, Syria? This is a reason for our "couple-tnerofs" to collapse the country's economy, cause discontent among the people, stir up chaos ... Have you heard about the theory of controlled chaos?
      Well, everything is clearly written there. Read, maybe you should not confuse causes with consequences.
      Success. wink
  21. -2
    19 November 2015 20: 44
    I wonder why they clap their hands like that? How is the new one different from the old one? Although no one saw the old one. But in general, by and large, this is a "big instruction" on the interaction of all authorities and industry.
    If there is the same "national security strategy:

    3. Improving the quality of life of Russian citizens

    45. The strategic goals of ensuring national security in the field of improving the quality of life of Russian citizens are to reduce the level of social and property inequality of the population, to stabilize its population in the medium term, and in the long term, to radically improve the demographic situation.
    46. ​​Improving the quality of life of Russian citizens is guaranteed by ensuring personal safety, as well as the availability of comfortable housing, high-quality and safe goods and services, worthy of payment for active labor.


    then definitely into the basket.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"