Media: Russian "strategists" used X-101 missiles in Syria

223
Russian strategic bombers in the course of air strikes on the IG facilities in Syria used, apparently, the newest cruise missiles X-101, reports Messenger of Mordovia with reference to the video appearing on the web.

Media: Russian "strategists" used X-101 missiles in Syria


According to the data available to the author, these air-based munitions "have low radar visibility and are capable of covering targets at a distance of up to 5,5 thousand km."

"Thanks to the most modern guidance system, X-101 have the highest accuracy of impact, the radius of deviation is no more than 2-5 m", - notes the publication.

According to experts, the tactical and technical characteristics allow us to call these missiles the best in the world.

X-101 capable of using modernized strategic bombers aviation. “Such a“ long arm ”allows the Russian armed forces to hit targets in any part of the world,” the publication concludes.
223 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +112
    18 November 2015 09: 05
    It was a great job and a demonstration of the capabilities of our videoconferencing.
    1. +72
      18 November 2015 09: 08
      So we checked in real conditions.
      Buried part of the bastards with its help.
      1. +38
        18 November 2015 09: 15
        I would like for vacuum bombs to be used in the mountains ... Yes, more so that the bomb was .... that it would be possible for the strategist at the limit of carrying capacity to drag it to the place of discharge.
        1. +32
          18 November 2015 09: 28
          There is no such bomb! There are volumetric explosion bombs.
          1. +21
            18 November 2015 16: 45
            smile And let's use a rubber bomb ?! lol Can you imagine how much she can jump? smile
          2. +5
            18 November 2015 19: 20
            Quote: Alex_Rarog
            There is no such bomb! There are volumetric explosion bombs.

            There is such a term in colloquial terms, briefly and succinctly ...
          3. +6
            18 November 2015 21: 20
            Russia has tested the world's most powerful vacuum bomb. The new weapon was dubbed the “father of all bombs” - by analogy with the American “mother”, which is 20 times inferior to our development. The high-power aviation vacuum bomb (AVBPM) is the old name of the ODAB (volume-detonating aircraft bombs or FAE - fuel air explosive) - created on the basis of the effect of a volumetric explosion of dusty gas and dusty air clouds. The aerosol created on the basis of nano-technologies detonates and burns so fast that at some point a vacuum is formed in the explosion radius (300 m2), where all living things die.
          4. +1
            20 November 2015 07: 28
            And there isn’t such one either - there is a volume-detonating explosion.
        2. +50
          18 November 2015 09: 32
          Quote: Bombardier
          I would like to use vacuum bombs in the mountains ... Yes, more so that the bomb was ....

          Click on the photo. Will this work?
          1. +12
            18 November 2015 17: 51
            Nah, this is impossible!
            Not humanely!
            At 2290m ​​from the epicenter, it suddenly knocks someone down with a wave!
            Bruise however will laughing
          2. +1
            19 November 2015 17: 19
            Click on the photo. Will this work?

            This one is definitely suitable:
        3. +2
          18 November 2015 09: 48
          Are you about the ODAB bomb series? 500 and so on
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +27
            18 November 2015 10: 00
            Quote: Pathfinder
            Are you about the ODAB bomb series? 500 and so on

            I do not know for sure whether it is serial or not, but there is one for a long time.
            On the evening of September 11, 2007, testing of the world's most powerful non-nuclear weapon began in Russia. The bomb, which surpassed the power of the American "Mother of All Bombs", was dropped from the Tu-160 by parachute. The explosion power in TNT equivalent was 44 tons, the radius of guaranteed destruction was 300 meters. By analogy with the American MOAB, the new bomb has already been nicknamed "the Father of all bombs", which, in association with the famous expression of Nikita Khrushchev, gave rise to the nickname "Kuz'kin's father".
            ODAB-500 is also a very effective thing. smile
            1. +7
              18 November 2015 10: 33
              Quote: Bayonet
              A bomb that surpassed the power of the American Mother of All Bombs, b

              Salute, camera)
              The Yankees sculpted their "mother" in great haste before the Afghan epic, even when they experienced it in Florida, they had no idea about its effectiveness and recommended that residents of the vicinity of the landfill crawl into the basements. For everyone, poke, chance))
            2. +3
              18 November 2015 23: 47
              The last shot of ISIS fighter?
        4. +3
          18 November 2015 09: 56
          Only in the gorge. In the real mountains, ODAB cannot be applied: they tried in Chechnya, nothing came of it. Applied some artificial tricks, but also without decisive success.
          1. +6
            18 November 2015 10: 20
            Quote: Azitral
            tried in Chechnya, nothing came of it.

            I heard that Tando was thrown into the Dagestan aul in August 99. The "Tando effect" was such that later the abreks ached from one appearance in the sky of the Su-25. I don't know how true this is.
            1. 0
              19 November 2015 17: 42
              about the use of such ammunition on auls in Dagestan, I doubt something .. although the use of aviation there was decent mainly helicopters .. but in Grozny they handled entire blocks to the fullest ... I personally saw ... it was scary that the guys had to wind up armored personnel carriers fishing rods with the whole company moved away from positions recourse
          2. +5
            18 November 2015 10: 39
            Quote: Azitral
            Only in the gorge.

            The people told, in Afghanistan they still used it. It was about the gorge that the conversation was. hi
          3. +12
            18 November 2015 10: 50
            For example, Soviet pilots in Afghanistan dropped ODAB-500P volume-detonating bombs weighing 500 kg onto dushmans. The bombs were dropped from the Su-25 attack aircraft, they were mainly used in the valleys. In mountainous areas, where an aerosol cloud of such bombs quickly dispersed, they were used together with ordinary smoke bombs. According to the pilots, the dense smoke from the smoke bombs did not allow the aerosol to quickly disperse. When bombing in the mountains, the following combination was used: for every 6 volume-detonating bombs, there were two smoke bombs. The effect of using these ammunition was terrible.
            http://topwar.ru/70814-aviacionnaya-bomba-obemnogo-vzryva-glavnyy-neyadernyy-arg

            ument-tu-160.html


            Well something like that.
        5. +11
          18 November 2015 13: 58
          Quote: Bombardier
          vacuum bombs used ...

          Colonel General and there. Well, stop calling them vacuum. Even when burning 100% oxygen, there will be no vacuum. You don’t have to talk about the combustion reaction, right? After all, oxygen does not just disappear. It is so? And given its presence in an amount of 20,95%, even its complete disappearance will not even lead to a vacuum state. soldier
          1. +5
            18 November 2015 18: 01
            Air pressure - 10 tons per square meter.
            Suppose a person’s surface area is about 1 meter square
            If the pressure increases sharply by 10%, then the pressure on the surface of the body will jump up to 11 tons. Those. man will compress with a force of 1 ton.
            If the pressure is sharply relieved by 10%, then the internal pressure will exceed the external pressure by 900 kg on an area of ​​1 square meter. Obviously, the lungs, for example, simply burst with the chest, because a blow from the inside will amount to several hundred kilograms.
            And you say - a vacuum ...
            1. +1
              18 November 2015 21: 56
              In an ODAB-500P explosion in an epicenter in the front of a shock wave, the pressure is 30 atm. this temperature is the main damaging factors. A further difference in the region of less than 1 atmosphere is zilch.
              Quote: Zefr
              And you say - a vacuum ...
              soldier
            2. 0
              20 November 2015 17: 20
              with the same success you can experience this pressure at 1 meter depth in the water, but no one dies from it, only the excess pressure and temperature kills that occurs after the combustion of a large volume, and not of a relatively point explosive
          2. -2
            18 November 2015 21: 33
            Have you ever put cans, there (just) a rather noticeable discharge is created from the match ... And besides, not only oxygen burns out, but as I understand it, the air mixture in general. And by the way, there is no absolute vacuum even in space.
            1. +1
              18 November 2015 21: 44
              Comrades, I realized that arguing with you is useless. You will find the description and performance characteristics of the ammunition.
            2. 0
              19 November 2015 01: 56
              It is not a matter of burnout, but the coefficient of thermal expansion. According to this principle, our atmosphere with cold and warm fronts circulates, moves billions of cubes of moisture and air masses. Somewhere warmer and less discharged, somewhere colder and denser, respectively, and the movement started.
            3. 0
              20 November 2015 17: 12
              oxygen doesn’t burn and doesn’t disappear, and there was no need to skip school
          3. 0
            19 November 2015 14: 17
            All is correct. But this is not a piece of paper with formulas falling from the sky. The conditional opponent will not be easier. Yes, and the formula will be interwoven with the air, apparently a secret one, but they will not strike a match ... 20% will not be limited. 80 ... 85% of the substances that make up the air will burn. Yes, it’s not even in chemistry, but in physics. A sharp pressure drop in a limited area ... the internal pressure of a person is higher than the environment and that's all ... capillaries and blood vessels burst. And alah akbar ...
      2. +15
        18 November 2015 09: 22
        Quote: Temples
        So we checked in real conditions.
        Buried part of the bastards with its help.

        Yes, some people also showed that we also have long hands, so that some hot heads would cool.
        1. +13
          18 November 2015 09: 25
          Just on yesterday’s question:
          Throw

          Russian defense ministry: Long-range aviation aircraft of the Russian aerospace forces joined the strikes against militant targets in Syria

          According to the video from the note, they hammer like Х101, which are visible in the drums.
          Question - is it not fat for the Papuans to feed such sweets? Are there few old bombs, or do we have a rubber MO budget?
          1. +20
            18 November 2015 09: 34
            Quote: Lance
            According to the video from the note, they hammer like Х101, which are visible in the drums.
            Question - is it not fat for the Papuans to feed such sweets?

            Checking the effectiveness of weapons is always not superfluous, so that a reasonable amount is needed!
          2. +2
            18 November 2015 10: 22
            Yes, ok, you have to try the same. You can still shoot one of the bearded mace with a Mace - they still experience it :)
            1. +8
              18 November 2015 10: 38
              Yeah. Bearded in Qatar must be shaved. They have long been asking for experimental rabbits.
        2. +5
          18 November 2015 09: 51
          That was the Saudi leader who was going to Moscow.
          1. +6
            18 November 2015 10: 43
            Quote: Angro Magno
            That's the Saudi leader in Moscow was going to

            to Markin? - he decided to give up. bully
            1. +4
              18 November 2015 14: 43
              Quote: Dryuya2
              to Markin? - he decided to give up.

              Why go to Markin, he immediately to Bortnikov - I ordered the plane, give 50 lemons.
        3. 0
          18 November 2015 17: 38
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZbUmkaesvo fellow
      3. +13
        18 November 2015 10: 06
        it was not meant for bastards, those are cheaper with bombs. there was a hint for the Saudis and 3.14ndos. gentle hint . Well, as thin, in diameter X-101.
        1. +4
          18 November 2015 10: 11
          Quote: just explo
          Well, as thin, in diameter X-101.

          742mm
          1. +5
            18 November 2015 10: 34
            Hint diameter 743 mm. Hmm ... it doesn’t sound like menacingly, but somehow even perverted.
            1. +11
              18 November 2015 12: 11
              the Saudis study girls separately from boys and the boys do not know how in reality girls look until they are almost of an adult age (the only woman they saw is their mother), because they are separated from girls in institutions. and on the street everyone in a burqa wants to, so see what the hell. therefore, among Saudis, homosexuality at puberty is very common, and a large part become real homosexuals (well, they liked it as a teenager). therefore, a hint with a diameter of 743 mm it sounds perverted to us, for the Saudis it sounds exciting.
              since all the same size matters.
              1. +2
                19 November 2015 18: 31
                In Saudi Arabia, women do not wear a burqa, but a hijab (face and hands are open). What women and girls look like Saudis know from childhood. For homosexuality in Saudi Arabia, the death penalty. Your vomit is the fruit of your perverted subconscious. If you are interested in the topic of homosexuality- refer to the experience of the "West", or at worst Russia, we have this phenomenon is also very common. There are a lot of pederast clubs in large cities.
      4. +3
        18 November 2015 11: 26
        Loudly said. Real conditions when there is air defense. But the experience is also good.
      5. +4
        18 November 2015 15: 49
        Still, they would have to interrupt the pipeline so that sources of financing would be reduced))
      6. +1
        19 November 2015 11: 39
        only I would like to know more precisely how much ... to estimate the cost of utilization of one scum for the Russian budget
    2. +13
      18 November 2015 09: 13
      Kirdyk Igilovtsam will be soon, and the work of our videoconferencing system - as a warning to everyone else .....
      1. +13
        18 November 2015 09: 22
        Information not yet confirmed or refuted by official sources.

        Submarine "Rostov-on-Don" struck "Caliber" on ISIS

        2015-11-17 21:17 События

        Russia today launched Kalibr cruise missile strikes against the IS capital from a submarine in the Mediterranean. This is the first practical use of such a weapon. By order of Russian President Vladimir Putin, this was the response to confirmation of the terrorist attack on board the A321 in Egypt.

        Russian diesel-electric submarine "Rostov-on-Don", making a transition from the Northern Fleet to Novorossiysk, struck from the eastern Mediterranean Sea at targets with cruise missiles "Kalibr"? in the vicinity of the Syrian city of Raqqa, the capital of the Islamic State banned in Russia, RBC reported, citing a source close to the Russian Defense Ministry.
        The aim of the strikes from the submarine submarine "Rostov-on-Don" were training bases, headquarters, warehouses with weapons and ammunition, points of deployment of militant detachments. The strike was carried out on a ballistic trajectory at an altitude of several kilometers to avoid incidents due to busy shipping in the Mediterranean. The launch from the Rostov-on-Don submarine became the first case of the use of cruise missiles launched from a submarine against the targets of a real enemy in the history of the Russian armed forces.
        1. +12
          18 November 2015 09: 50
          I'm not a sailor - please explain the picture - after all, it seems that in the Varshavyanki the Kyrgyz Republic exits through torpedo tubes. And there are some mines in the picture. And the amount of ammunition of this type on the submarine varies - in the picture and in open sources.
          1. +7
            18 November 2015 10: 35
            The picture was drawn by a man confusing a submarine.
            1. jjj
              +3
              18 November 2015 10: 48
              On the other hand, this information explains why the boat came into Kronstadt - the ammunition was loaded. And for disguise they came up with a story with a malfunction
              1. +4
                18 November 2015 11: 07
                why the boat went to Kronstadt - ammunition loaded

                As an option. But still, the launch comes from torpedo tubes.
                1. jjj
                  +1
                  18 November 2015 20: 13
                  Quote: Wedmak
                  As an option. But still, the launch comes from torpedo tubes.

                  It is without options, as is loading. Moreover, loading gutters in the kit of the boat itself
            2. +8
              18 November 2015 11: 29
              He is an "artist" ... he is "so sees."
            3. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          18 November 2015 13: 35
          Quote: Good Me
          The launch from the Rostov-on-Don submarine became the first case of the use of cruise missiles launched from a submarine against the targets of a real enemy in the history of the Russian armed forces.



          And what about the use of Tu-95 \ 160 strategists in real combat operations? Isn't it the first time?
      2. +28
        18 November 2015 10: 32
        Quote: Alexey-74
        Kirdyk Igilovtsam will be soon, and the work of our videoconferencing system - as a warning to everyone else .....

        Seem Yoda is talking too ...
        1. +2
          18 November 2015 10: 52
          Ukrainians need to equip ISIS. (Since both of them are sweeping, hunting is war.) It would be advisable.
        2. +3
          18 November 2015 10: 59
          It is necessary to drop the bomb along with the pig carcass in a bag. That the martyrs from the militants did not work.
          such an insidious move - stained them with pork, and the martyrs did not happen ...
        3. +7
          18 November 2015 11: 11
          Quote: podpolkovnik
          Seem Yoda is talking too ...


          Kadyrov suggested dropping terrorists on the positions of "IS"
          "I propose to suspend terrorists from drones attacking the positions of the Iblis state during arrest, and throw them on the heads of accomplices."
          http://www.rg.ru/2015/11/17/reg-skfo/igil-anons.html

          I propose, in order to enhance the shock effect, to sew up the terrorig in pork skins, as Yermolov practiced ...
          1. +10
            18 November 2015 11: 37
            Quote: Good Me
            Kadyrov suggested dropping terrorists on the positions of "IS"
            "I propose to suspend terrorists from drones attacking the positions of the Iblis state during arrest, and throw them on the heads of accomplices."
    3. icy
      +11
      18 November 2015 09: 19
      "Show dance" for Qatar and the Saudis.
      1. 0
        18 November 2015 10: 31
        Quote: icas
        "Show dance" for Qatar and the Saudis.

        Yes, these Wahhabis that on the forehead, that on the forehead - they do not understand hints.
        They must first really work out on their territory throughout the depths, and then talk. Fortunately, there is a reason for this - they finance world terrorism, which, by the way, is not hidden.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +9
      18 November 2015 09: 51
      For reference (to whom it is interesting) from open sources:

      Length - 7.6 m (estimate)
      Wingspan - 4.4 m (estimate)
      Case diameter - 0.75 m (estimate)
      Area of ​​EPR - 0.01 sq.m

      Weight - 2200-2400 kg
      Mass of warhead - 400 kg

      Range - 5000-5500 km
      Maximum speed - 250-270 m / s
      Cruising speed - 190-200 m / s
      Flight altitude:
      - minimal - 30-70 m
      - maximum marching - 6000 m
      QUO:
      - 12-20 m
      - 6-9 m (during testing, Jane's)
      - 100 m (mod. With nuclear warhead, Jane's)
      Flight Duration - 10 hours
      1. +13
        18 November 2015 10: 28
        interesting math turns out)
        Take the cruising speed of a rocket of 200 m / s and a flight duration of 10 hours. In an hour at this speed, it will pass 720 km. And in 10 hours - 7200 km smile It turns out that the maximum flight range is not 5,5 thousand km but 7200))) But there were numbers about 10 000 km ...
        It seems to me that here the story is like with Caliber - the true range is kept secret. And the figure of 5500 km is what it was decided to open to the masses.
        1. +15
          18 November 2015 11: 08
          Well, it’s not different wink
          another photo, it’s painfully beautiful:
          1. +2
            18 November 2015 11: 25
            frankly, to plant such expensive products on beards, the toad strangles, they are not worth it. It could have been better, 40 KAB 250 or 20 KAB 500 pieces into each bomber to load, the range allows both "cheap" and cheerful!
            1. +5
              18 November 2015 16: 31
              Read how the shares of Russian companies soared after that! It's okay, it's high time to actually test these "toys"
    8. wow
      +3
      18 November 2015 19: 18
      Work for the good. I envy white envy !!!
    9. 0
      19 November 2015 14: 26
      Iskander M is next in line.
  2. +33
    18 November 2015 09: 05
    Now let those who blather in our direction all this time think about it !!!
    BRAVO VKS !!! I am proud !!!
    1. +6
      18 November 2015 10: 11
      Quote: Mihalich17
      Now let those who blather in our direction all this time think about it !!!
      BRAVO VKS !!! I am proud !!!

      And apparently this is not the last "salute" with the use of KR. Yes, it is expensive, but the political effect is lethal.
      And as I said, the VKS group will be strengthened. And then the French finally woke up. The French aircraft carrier came up. Now everything starts as an adult. hi
    2. +58
      18 November 2015 10: 15
      And Iran seems to have brought serious people. Doesn't it remind anyone? fellow
      1. +9
        18 November 2015 10: 24
        very similar soldier
        1. +16
          18 November 2015 11: 02
          Quote: vel19777
          very similar soldier


          Not a word, if you want it or not, you begin to believe in reincarnation!
      2. +5
        18 November 2015 11: 13
        Come on...! - the first thing that came to mind when viewing photos laughing
      3. +10
        18 November 2015 11: 46
        Quote: SibRUS
        And Iran seems to have brought serious people. Doesn't it remind anyone?

        Severe, brutal, Comrade Stalin!
        1. +5
          18 November 2015 12: 45
          Yes, there are similarities. But more like Yakubovich, only a mustache is more magnificent.
      4. +7
        18 November 2015 12: 52
        Not very similar. Only if briefly and from afar.
        Rather like Yakubovich. And there will be a special "Field of Miracles" for the barmaley
        1. +1
          18 November 2015 19: 07
          Quote: abrakadabre
          Not very similar. Only if briefly and from afar.
          Rather like Yakubovich. And there will be a special "Field of Miracles" for the barmaley

          Yes, hot Yakubovich / Yanukevich / Yanukovych / Yushchenko wassat , the main thing is to help strengthen the Syrian army.
          P.S. Field of Dreams? Are such fields created by remote mining? wink laughing
      5. +2
        18 November 2015 22: 05
        “All right, pashutyly and grabbed,” said Leonid Ilyich, re-gluing his eyebrows under his nose.
      6. 0
        18 November 2015 23: 07
        Quote: SibRUS
        And Iran seems to have brought serious people. Doesn't it remind anyone? fellow

        Moreover, they attached this form to the face of their cyborgs.
      7. +4
        19 November 2015 01: 58
        I first saw this picture and almost went nuts ....

        still the pipe would stand nearby ... speechless speechless .....
      8. +1
        19 November 2015 10: 33
        reincarnation -He is back !!
  3. +6
    18 November 2015 09: 05
    yeah, we have long hands we will get anyone, and the plane KRASAVA
    1. +19
      18 November 2015 09: 14
      Hannah, come on here, here you urgently need to condemn the actions of Russia.
      1. +5
        18 November 2015 09: 17
        Now will be back ... the money is paid. Only comrades will call.
      2. SSR
        +2
        18 November 2015 09: 34
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Hannah, come on here, here you urgently need to condemn the actions of Russia.

        If this poor girl also comes here crying ala "akhedzhakova" - then she will show off with skulls, the poor one was already driven into dullness in one morning. And we have few girls here. feel )))
        It is a pity that she cannot ask the opinions of the people who died and suffered from another terrorist attack on the market in Nigeria, for which these ordinary peaceful people died at the hands of terrorists? Probably they would say in her opinion - please almond, they are wrestlers with them.
      3. +3
        18 November 2015 10: 00
        Alexander, a very interesting satellite was launched in Plesetsk (1st "Tundra"). Consider a new "era" of early warning system. Can you read an article ?!
        1. jjj
          +1
          18 November 2015 10: 52
          Are you inciting to disclose? Now, not the carrier, but the "man on the bus" can be hooked
          1. +2
            18 November 2015 19: 31
            Quote: jjj
            Are you inciting to disclose? Now, not the carrier, but the "man on the bus" can be hooked

            And so from the MO site:
        2. +1
          18 November 2015 13: 39
          Quote: Samaritan
          Alexander, a very interesting satellite was launched in Plesetsk (1st "Tundra"). Consider a new "era" of early warning system. Can you read an article ?!



          They, like, have already launched three what
          1. 0
            18 November 2015 19: 55
            You confuse it with the Prime Minister or with the ...
            1. 0
              20 November 2015 13: 57
              Quote: Samaritan
              You confuse it with the Prime Minister or with the ...



              Perhaps ... But definitely not "Eye" ...
  4. +5
    18 November 2015 09: 06
    Let's exercise and experience wink ALL FOR USE wink
  5. +23
    18 November 2015 09: 07
    So, that there have not yet experienced ... Iskander!
    1. +7
      18 November 2015 09: 28
      Oh well! Syria is far away! How long will it take for delivery ?! Better- "Topol-M", "Yars" .....
    2. +3
      18 November 2015 10: 14
      Quote: Engineer
      So, that there have not yet experienced ... Iskander!

      I don’t think that the Iskanders will work in Syria, although I have to admit, there was such a thought. But a range of 500 km implies the Iskander’s presence in Syria, and there the adversary’s specialists will climb out of their pants in order to get at least one of our installations for study.
      1. +2
        18 November 2015 10: 25
        Quote: NEXUS
        I do not think that the Iskanders will work in Syria.

        actually it
        Quote: Engineer
        So, that there have not yet experienced ... Iskander!

        was a joke. laughing
      2. +3
        18 November 2015 12: 55
        The official range implies work from Syria itself. Because (suddenly, in fact, it is Iskander can) if launched from the Crimea or the Caucasus ... This is such a howl will raise all the "partners"
        1. 0
          18 November 2015 21: 48
          Howl will not raise. At least the dot lit up. hi
  6. +11
    18 November 2015 09: 08
    “Thanks to the state-of-the-art guidance system, the X-101s have the highest hit accuracy, deflection radius not more than 2-5 m”
    Such modern weapons systems simply need to be used in Syria in order to test them for efficiency and reliability in real combat conditions.
  7. +25
    18 November 2015 09: 09
    According to the data available to the author, these air-based munitions "have low radar visibility and are capable of covering targets at a distance of up to 5,5 thousand km."
    It is unprofitable to use such missiles for striking Syria. Therefore, I can assume that this was done for the sake of demonstrating strength, as well as for testing. In fact, no matter how it sounds, Syria at the moment is a great training ground.
    1. +10
      18 November 2015 09: 21
      I want to ask those who know feel
      Painfully luxurious pieces of missiles fall to the ground ... I understand that the "brains" along with the warhead went to the target.
      Is there nothing secret in such fragments? This is kind of from X-101
      In the 404 country, the censor is just a holiday ... rotten Russian missiles lol
      1. +32
        18 November 2015 09: 32
        And what could be secret there? Before the fall, a special system is triggered and the remaining fuel burns the stage (as can be seen in the video).

        The engine, there is quite ordinary. And here, after all, that the Babakhs will not repeat it, they will not start it. Americans and Europeans can study it, but they won’t collect anything particularly breakthrough.

        Luminium and copper can be scrapped.

        Now, if the rocket fell entirely, without burning out, then intelligence would have fussed.
        1. 0
          18 November 2015 10: 11
          Before the fall, a special system is triggered and the remaining fuel burns the stage (as can be seen in the video).
          But cruise missiles do they have steps ???? In my opinion, the rocket explodes along with the remaining fuel that was in it at that moment. It seems like there shouldn’t be such residues as in the photo, but it’s not a fact that this is generally a Russian wing. rocket.
          1. +1
            18 November 2015 12: 15
            Quote: DenZ
            But cruise missiles do they have steps ????


            They have, in certain modifications. Remember the movie "72 meters", and what according to the script "woke up" the mine of the Second World War ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. -2
          18 November 2015 10: 43
          Most likely this is a fallen rocket. The video shows how kerosene burns out. The BG in the Kyrgyz Republic does not separate (the tomahawk can have two BGs. One can fall independently on the target). Some part of the rockets is falling. This is the X-101 (the engine is taken out of the case)
          1. +8
            18 November 2015 12: 14
            This is the X-101 (the engine is taken out of the case)

            No. This is the X-55 or X-555 (externally structurally different by the presence of two small planes on the nose fairing). The engine is single and it is by no means used kerosene, but some very toxic rubbish to increase power. The launch is carried out by a pirostarter.
            In the photo, most likely the detached fuel tank with the engine, and the warhead went further (like a bomb).

            1. -9
              18 November 2015 12: 28
              And you think why the BG should be separated from the carrier when it hits the target. It is better for fuel to explode and burn out on purpose and breaking through will be due to mass higher. So the rocket fell
              1. +4
                18 November 2015 12: 46
                Quote: Zaurbek
                And you think why the BG should be separated from the carrier when it hits the target. It is better for fuel to explode and burn out on purpose and breaking through will be due to mass higher. So the rocket fell

                This is a question for designers. smile My opinion: since the tank itself is thin-walled (very clearly visible in the photo and video), and the damaging burning power of the remaining fuel is minimal, this appendage will simply interfere when the warhead is aimed at the target.
            2. +1
              18 November 2015 12: 42
              Separation of warhead from tanks + engine (burn and fall to the ground):
              1. +1
                18 November 2015 18: 28
                Quote: GOgaRu
                Separation of warhead from tanks + engine (burn and fall to the ground):

                Or, as an option, the separation of additional discharged fuel tanks for the modification of the X-55CM (maximum range increased from 2500 to 3500 km).
        4. -6
          18 November 2015 11: 48
          these are fragments of a self-exploded rocket, there is a video (the video was deleted sad). Our cruise missiles can only separate the powder booster, which is needed to accelerate the rocket before launching the main engine, such as "caliber", on air-launched missiles they do not, since the initial speed is provided by the carrier!
      2. +7
        18 November 2015 09: 45
        This is rocket X 555.
        1. +4
          18 November 2015 10: 05
          Quote: Vadim237
          This is rocket X 555.

          Well then, it's definitely X-101 good
          Like a fresh video from November 17th. Fights near Palmyra. "Crocodiles" work

      3. +2
        18 November 2015 10: 37
        Quote: CONNECTING ROD VDVshny
        Is there nothing secret in such fragments? This is kind of from X-101

        I also thought about this issue. Most likely, the most interesting thing explodes with the warhead. The designers thought of everything, it would be foolish to give secrets to the enemy.
      4. +8
        18 November 2015 11: 05
        Quote: PANEL VDVshny
        I want to ask those who know feel
        Painfully luxurious pieces of missiles fall to the ground ... I understand that the "brains" along with the warhead went to the target.
        Is there nothing secret in such fragments? This is kind of from X-101
        In the 404 country, the censor is just a holiday ... rotten Russian missiles lol


        And how did you get to the censor? He was blocked by us.
        Government, return the circus to the people!
        1. 0
          18 November 2015 11: 29
          Works. There is no lock
        2. +1
          18 November 2015 11: 57
          Quote: arane
          And how did you get to the censor? He was blocked by us.

          Quote: kaluganew
          Works. There is no lock

          I don’t know, I have it blocked. I go in from the mirror.
        3. +3
          18 November 2015 15: 56
          Quote: arane
          He was blocked by us.

          Thor browser solves any lock problems ...
    2. +1
      19 November 2015 09: 45
      Quote: Roman1970
      It is unprofitable to use such missiles for striking Syria.

      One unit of precision weapons replaces a large number of conventional weapons. One hour of flight of an SU-24 type aircraft - 3 million rubles. And if they didn’t hit the target once, will the enemy wait for a second strike? Air reconnaissance must be carried out again.

      And then a satellite flew by. Set goals. Checked. Destroyed with one precision strike.
      Aircraft cruise missile is not very expensive. This is a kerosene tank, a one-time suitcase-sized engine, and a homing head ...

      Well, the psychological effect of a massive precision strike is important. The Americans blew up two atomic bombs and ended the Japanese.
  8. +14
    18 November 2015 09: 14
    The use of long-range aviation was obvious, now there was just a reason to use it, at the same time all the planes were tested in combat conditions, since before that only the Tu-22M3 had experience in real combat operations. Now the old Tu-95 have found their application.
    1. FID
      +9
      18 November 2015 09: 39
      Quote: inkass_98
      old people Tu-95

      These are strategists, not long-range ...
      1. jjj
        +8
        18 November 2015 10: 56
        At one time, in order to save the Tu-22M3 from being cut according to an agreement with the United States, ours called it a heavy fighter. The Americans argued that, according to technical data, it was a bomber. And ours stubbornly proved that the Tupolev fighter turned out this way. And yet, they got their way
  9. +11
    18 November 2015 09: 16
    Quote: Engineer
    So, that there have not yet experienced ... Iskander!

    Nope, Mace)))
    1. +11
      18 November 2015 09: 43
      Quote: dukalis
      Quote: Engineer
      So, that there have not yet experienced ... Iskander!

      Nope, Mace)))

      You can and this lol :
      1. +4
        18 November 2015 11: 20
        It's nice, damn it, to realize that in this case we have "candy ASSORTED", and not just annoying expired candied fruits winked
    2. +3
      18 November 2015 10: 16
      Quote: dukalis
      Nope, Mace)))

      Even our submarines were not fired by Caliber. Plus, it would be necessary to test the new Tornado-S.
  10. +12
    18 November 2015 09: 18
    Syria is a real testing ground for new weapons
    1. +11
      18 November 2015 10: 32
      Quote: Million
      Syria is a real testing ground for new weapons

      No, not for verification. We have enough polygons to check.
      This is a demonstration ground. Because the enemy must know what size club we have. The device of the club is not necessary to know, but the owner of the club can simply clearly inform him that it is suitable and securely knock it down.
      Which is being successfully implemented!
      And for the submission of material in tyrnets, there is a separate respect and respect for our television people. Not all the House-2 untwist!
  11. +2
    18 November 2015 09: 18
    Great proof of the use of impact components! Bravo!
  12. +5
    18 November 2015 09: 18
    So we’ll run in our new features. And for the throaty a good lesson.

    Are the Balts silent? Or how about a duck on the third day? Or do not have time to spit out the mericatos for everyone? laughing
    1. +1
      18 November 2015 10: 46
      They digest the words of a black overseas leader.
      http://topwar.ru/86405-proekt-zz-geopoliticheskiy-sdvig.html
  13. +4
    18 November 2015 09: 19
    What interests me most is what exactly launched the Tu-22M3. They are not carriers of either the X-101 or Caliber, only the X-22 which are useless to say the least against ground targets.
    1. +7
      18 November 2015 09: 21
      Su-34 can carry up to 2 missiles on an external sling
      Tu-22M can carry up to 4 missiles
      Tu-95MSM can carry up to 8 external missiles
      Tu-160M ​​can carry up to 12 missiles in two internal compartments
      1. FID
        +9
        18 November 2015 09: 42
        Quote: pomegranate
        Tu-22M can carry up to 4 missiles

        Where is it from ??? If not a drum, then 3 suspension units, if a drum, then 10 missiles, you are obviously simply not familiar with this aircraft ...
        1. +1
          18 November 2015 10: 19
          Quote: SSI
          Where is it from ??? If not a drum, then 3 suspension units, if a drum, then 10 missiles, you are obviously simply not familiar with this aircraft ...

          Good day to you, Sergey Ivanovich. drinks SU-34 like x-101 can carry ... request Or all the same two?
          1. FID
            +7
            18 November 2015 10: 38
            Quote: NEXUS
            SU-34 like x-101 can carry ...

            Hello Andrey! God be with them, Su-34, a report on the Tu-22M3, Tu-95MS and Tu-160 ... The Su-34 is a remade of the Su-27, I know little of them, but the long-range and strategists are my bread (the former true, but ...).
            1. +4
              18 November 2015 13: 35
              Quote: SSI
              Hello Andrey! God be with them, Su-34, a report on the Tu-22M3, Tu-95MS and Tu-160 ... The Su-34 is a remade of the Su-27, I know little of them, but the long-range and strategists are my bread (the former true, but ...).

              Beautiful infections ... that the 160th, that the 22nd ... well, the 95th "old man" showed that there is still gunpowder in the flasks good
              Thank you for these cars Yes
            2. -1
              19 November 2015 01: 25
              Quote: SSI
              Su-34 is a redesigned Su-27, I know them a little

              This is a converted SU-24 (bomber). Su-34 is also a bomber.
              Su - 35 - redesigned SU-27 (only very much remade) ...
              1. +1
                20 November 2015 22: 00
                Quote: Stena
                This is a converted SU-24 (bomber). Su-34 is also a bomber.
                Su - 35 - redesigned SU-27 (only very much remade) ...

                Do not say nonsense. Well, just look at the Su-24 and Su-34. The glider is completely different! Su-24 with variable sweep of the wing, Su-34 with an integrated layout. How could anyone say that? laughing

                Both the Su-34 and Su-35 are modifications of the Su-27 (T-10S)
                Su-34 is also called Su-27IB (fighter-bomber) or T-10V
                Su-35S is also called T-10BM.
                1. 0
                  20 November 2015 22: 03
                  Quote: SIvan
                  The glider is completely different! Su-24 with variable sweep of the wing, Su-34 with an integrated layout. How could anyone say that?

                  Both the Su-34 and Su-35 are modifications of the Su-27 (T-10S)
                  Su-34 is also called Su-27IB (fighter-bomber) or T-10V
                  Su-35S is also called T-10BM.

                  Yes, that's right. Thank you for correcting. That's all - really SU-35 and Su-34 - modifications of the SU-27.
            3. 0
              19 November 2015 22: 25
              Well then, the Su-25 is a redone IL-2)))
          2. +1
            18 November 2015 22: 41
            Quote: NEXUS
            SU-34 like x-101 can carry


            Нет! soldier
      2. +2
        18 November 2015 10: 37
        Quote: pomegranate
        Su-34 can carry up to 2 missiles on an external sling


        Su-34 will never take such a huge rocket. Look at its length. Brahmos is shorter - and then only under the fuselages with restrictions on take-off and landing (if not shot).

        And x-101 is even bigger. If only once they make a shortened one, then maybe they will take one.
      3. 0
        19 November 2015 01: 04
        Quote: pomegranate
        Tu-95MSM can carry up to 8 external missiles

        16 missiles maximum. Modification of the Tu-95 MS16.
    2. -3
      18 November 2015 09: 22
      On November 17, 2015, Tu-22M3, Tu-160 and Tu-95MS strategic bombers launched 34 air-launched Caliber cruise missiles
      1. FID
        +4
        18 November 2015 09: 44
        Quote: pomegranate
        "Caliber" air-based

        I beg your pardon, you inquire at least about "Caliber", before writing this ...
        1. +11
          18 November 2015 09: 56
          The name "Caliber" hides a whole family of ground, air and sea-based missiles capable of flying in a wide range of speeds: from subsonic to 3M
          The Caliber-A missile system was first presented at the IDEX-2007 exhibition (Abu Dhabi, UAE). The airborne 3M-14AE missile is part of the armament of the Su-35 attack aircraft (up to 3 units on board) and is planned to arm the MiG-35 fighter. 3M-14AE does not have a starting engine and is housed in a transport and launch container, from which the launch is carried out after being dropped from the carrier aircraft.
          1. +2
            18 November 2015 10: 11
            Plus, I really didn’t know that there was also an aviation caliber.
            1. 0
              18 November 2015 22: 43
              Quote: just explo
              I really didn’t know that there was also an aviation caliber.


              And more .. "Death Star" wassat
          2. +1
            18 November 2015 22: 43
            Quote: pomegranate
            The Caliber-A missile system was first presented at the IDEX-2007 exhibition (Abu Dhabi, UAE). The airborne 3M-14AE missile is part of the armament of the Su-35 attack aircraft (up to 3 units on board) and is planned to arm the MiG-35 fighter. 3M-14AE does not have a starting engine and is housed in a transport and launch container, from which the launch is carried out after being dropped from the carrier aircraft.


            "Wishlist" and .. "desire" .. they are not the same soldier
        2. 0
          18 November 2015 10: 57
          Quote: SSI
          I beg your pardon, you inquire at least about "Caliber", before writing this ...


          Judging by the information found on the network on the KR "Caliber-A", it would not hurt you in relation to pomegranate, leave one comment from your comment "I apologize"...



          Once again I am convinced, THERE ARE NO UNBEATABLE AUTHORITIES ...
          1. FID
            +6
            18 November 2015 11: 48
            Quote: Good Me
            Once again, I am convinced THERE ARE NO UNBEATABLE AUTHORITIES ..

            I am not familiar with the Tu-22M3, Tu-95MS and Tu-160 on the Internet, so I will refrain from commenting on the "network experts", moreover, I am not going to be the "indisputable authority" to which you are trying to attribute me. If you worked with long-range and strategists (not over the network, but in real life), give examples, not coves, I apologize.
          2. +1
            18 November 2015 22: 45
            Quote: Good Me
            Judging by the information found on the network on the KR "Caliber-A"


            I, when a gram so under 350 cognac "pump" .. you this .... "tell you" ... your .. networks will "quietly squeal" depending on drinks
    3. +1
      18 November 2015 09: 25
      FABs are quite effective weapons, especially in quantities that the Tu-33M3 group can deliver to the target.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        18 November 2015 09: 51
        Quote: ARS56
        FABs are quite effective weapons, especially in quantities that the Tu-33M3 group can deliver to the target.

        Well, if you want to grind all the people of Raqqa into mincemeat, then probably yes.
      3. +7
        18 November 2015 10: 00
        Quote: ARS56
        FABs are quite effective weapons, especially in quantities that the group can deliver to the target. Tu-33M3.


        Cannot, Tu-33M3, strike as a GROUP, since we have, in stock, only a single flight sample undergoing tests.

        And anyway, where did you get this private information ??? Should be sorted out ...
        1. +6
          18 November 2015 10: 12
          banter counted. but it is worth paying attention that the Tu-33 as being tested is unlikely to be M3.
          1. +4
            18 November 2015 10: 13
            Quote: just explo
            banter counted. but it is worth paying attention that the Tu-33 as being tested is unlikely to be M3.

            I followed the text ... request
      4. +2
        18 November 2015 22: 47
        Quote: ARS56
        FABs are quite effective weapons, especially in quantities that the Tu-33M3 group can deliver to the target.


        In principle, yes, but:
        1. For what purposes.
        2 The quantity (required outfit) directly depends on the range to the target, so what can be "hung" does not always correspond to what can be ... at this range .. "convey" soldier
    4. +2
      18 November 2015 09: 26
      They wore gifts in the form of bombs, and in total weight up to 24000 kg. Not bad!!! And the X-22 can be perfectly used for ground targets, the usual warhead 900kg.
      1. +2
        18 November 2015 09: 41
        Only the X-22 accuracy, to put it mildly, does not meet the requirements of high-precision weapons. Although, this operation would be an excellent occasion to shoot obsolete products.
        1. +2
          18 November 2015 22: 50
          Quote: kit-kat
          Only the X-22 accuracy, to put it mildly, does not meet the requirements of precision weapons


          Who told you that? belay
      2. +1
        18 November 2015 22: 49
        Quote: kot23
        and in total weight up to 24000 kg


        Do not drink in the morning .... affects the perception of reality soldier
    5. +3
      18 November 2015 09: 29
      Quote: Mera Joota
      What interests me most is what exactly launched the Tu-22M3.

      Judging by the video and infe, they used the KAB 500 for a bunch of fuel trucks. X 101 is TU 160 and TU 95
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        18 November 2015 09: 50
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Judging by the video and infe, they used the KAB 500 for a bunch of fuel trucks. X 101 is TU 160 and TU 95

        Is there a Tu-22M3 video from the KAB-500 or is this an assumption?
        1. +1
          18 November 2015 09: 54
          Quote: Mera Joota
          Is there a Tu-22M3 video from the KAB-500 or is this an assumption?

          Well, maybe the FAB 500, maybe I was wrong. Yesterday the video was on the site.
        2. +2
          18 November 2015 22: 51
          Quote: Mera Joota
          Is there a Tu-22M3 video from the KAB-500 or is this an assumption?


          There is no such video .. there are 250-270,250,1500 and 3000 drinks
      3. FID
        +3
        18 November 2015 10: 38
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Judging by the video and info, they used the KAB 500

        And not 250 ???
    6. +1
      18 November 2015 09: 31
      10 pieces of X-15 can drag.
      1. FID
        +6
        18 November 2015 09: 46
        Quote: wizarden
        10 pieces X-15 can drag

        Maybe, but I haven’t seen a single X-15, and not a single Tu-22M3 drum ...
    7. 0
      18 November 2015 09: 43
      Judging by the MoD video, the "jerboas" were bombed.
    8. 0
      18 November 2015 09: 51
      Well, they can not only carry X-22, but the FAB in 9 can fall by accident:

      Armament: one 23-mm gun GSh-23 in the tail turret; maximum combat load 24000 kg, including those placed on a rotating launcher in the bomb bay of the Kyrgyz Republic X-22 (NATO designation - AS-4 "Kitchen") with a nuclear or conventional warhead, UR class air-to-surface short-range X-15 (AS- 16 "Kickback") or X-15P anti-radar missiles; FAB bombs, moreover, in the bomb bay it is allowed to place one bomb in caliber 9000 kg; other aircraft armament consists of air-to-surface missile defense class X-31А / П (AS-17 "Kripton") and Х-35 (AS-20 "Kayak")


      The Tu-22M3 long-range multi-mode missile bomber is designed to launch missile and bomb strikes in the operational zones of land and sea theaters of military operations against stationary and moving objects by guided missiles and aerial bombs, both singly and as part of a group of aircraft, at any time of the year and days, in simple and difficult weather conditions, with the counteraction of modern air defense systems and the use of electronic interference. It provides the defeat of optically visible and radar-contrast, single and area targets, in a wide range of speeds and altitudes. Tu-22M3 can solve the following main tasks: destruction (defeat) of military-industrial facilities in the deep operational rear of the theater of operations; destruction (defeat) of objects and targets of the opposing operational-strategic grouping of troops, aviation and air defense; isolation of the area of ​​military operations and enemy strike forces from suitable operational and strategic reserves; destruction (defeat) of enemy naval groups in naval theaters of operations; participation in operations of fronts, fleets, air forces and air defense forces; conducting air reconnaissance using standard on-board electronic equipment and aerial equipment; active and passive jamming of attacking aircraft, controls and guidance of fighter-interceptors, as well as missile systems.
      1. +1
        18 November 2015 22: 52
        Quote: Laksamana Besar
        and the FAB may fall by 9 tons by chance:


        Can't ... your "infa" .. SHOOT! soldier
    9. +2
      18 November 2015 10: 07
      ..... What interests me most is what exactly launched the Tu-22M3. ....

      ... Most likely they didn’t start it, but threw it ..... Apparently the FAB-250 and FAB-500 ..... Yesterday, on the news, frames of the suspension of the FABs flashed in one story .... hi
    10. 0
      18 November 2015 10: 45
      Tu-22 carried bombs. tons 15
      1. +2
        18 November 2015 22: 53
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Tu-22 carried bombs. tons 15


        The fact that the bombs .. that's for sure, but not tons, but STUK and not 15, but 12-t 250-k soldier
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. +2
      18 November 2015 22: 40
      Quote: Mera Joota
      only X-22s which are useless to say the least against ground targets.


      And the fact that ground targets are "DIFFERENT" wink and the head of the seeker of the X-22 missiles is the same .. there is nothing to do .. "leads" .. your thought wink
      So what about ... "useless" .. you are very big .. "got excited" soldier
      1. +1
        19 November 2015 14: 08
        Quote: ancient
        So what about ... "useless" .. you are very big .. "got excited"

        Of course they are not "useless", for their time there were very few products. Only their time has already gone ... and the hassle with refueling is still the same.
  14. KOH
    +5
    18 November 2015 09: 22
    Yeah! Qatar shrank to the barn, maybe they won’t get there ...))))
    1. +8
      18 November 2015 09: 34
      So already hit, howl in Tweeters - destroyed the moderate bread factory! Now there is nothing to eat! Al Russi damned. At the same time, the factory is characterized by flour in torn barrels of aluminum powder. Good bread was laughing .
    2. +2
      18 November 2015 09: 36
      to the American base on their territory
    3. +6
      18 November 2015 09: 38
      Quote: CON
      Yeah! Qatar shrank to the barn ...))))

      And how much, sorry, is that Qatar? lol
      I wanted the words of Churkin (http://ruskline.ru/news_rl/2012/02/08/grozilsya_li_vchurkin_chto_katar_ne_dozhi
      vet_do_zavtra) were true, but the diplomat is NOW, although the diplomats are also people and their nerves are not iron
      1. The comment was deleted.
  15. +9
    18 November 2015 09: 26
    I can not get rid of cynical thoughts. Ships, submarines, VKS, long-range aviation ... POLYGON.
    1. +2
      18 November 2015 10: 20
      this is war (and thank God that so far we have not!)
    2. 0
      18 November 2015 18: 41
      Quote: bentonit
      ... POLYGON.

      Not a landfill. Retribution. Well, a little demonstration for those who had vile thoughts.
  16. +7
    18 November 2015 09: 27
    a serious training ground for testing proven weapons and an advertising company even wherever. The main thing is that everyone understands this and there are no complaints. . . The Americans tried to promote their own, but then there is a sharp competitor, and even what)))
    1. +6
      18 November 2015 11: 09
      a serious training ground for testing proven weapons and an advertising company even wherever.

      I would also add an information attack - after Putin's words that we will find and destroy at any point, there is strong evidence that these are not empty words - a whole video series about the destroyed "fighters for the independence of Ichkeria" and other creatures. And also interviews with former (although what kind of former are they?) Intelligence officers about such operations. Especially about the destruction in Qatar - when two of our representatives at the embassy were detained and then abruptly released. Or, when some evil killer on the move from a motorcycle drove 11 bullets and everything is "unmistakable", in another country he helped another scumbag to ascend "to hell". For what I am sure 100% support Putin, it is for his "vindictiveness", if he said the khan will come to you, then he will come.
  17. +5
    18 November 2015 09: 28
    Quote: Roman1970
    It is unprofitable to use such missiles for striking Syria. Therefore, I can assume that this was done for the sake of demonstrating strength, as well as for testing. In fact, no matter how it sounds, Syria at the moment is a great training ground.


    Absolutely to the point. On the one hand - to shoot from a cannon at sparrows is wasteful, but on the other - where else to test it? Yes, and it’s useful to show a neighbor that you’re looking, it will reduce the borzoi!
    1. +1
      18 November 2015 11: 13
      On the one hand - to shoot from a cannon at sparrows is wasteful, but on the other - where else to test it?

      after one shot at the sparrows, even single and the most solitary, another time at the sight of a gun, they will flee and shit no worse than pigeons! feel
    2. +1
      18 November 2015 11: 23
      Quote: beer-youk
      - where else to experience it?

      In Iraq, for example. Pre-warning the United States, and then, to gasp for them.
      And after - a comment: be called, citizens, - you were right - OVER!
  18. +4
    18 November 2015 09: 30
    They gave it, they gave it. The main thing is the double benefit - the barmaley were fried, and the rest were shown that the arsenals were not empty and there was gunpowder in the powder flasks.
    IMHO, such an application is better than hitting polygons. It’s time for Qatar to sew white flags and prepare silk laces for self-strangulation of those responsible for the death of our aircraft. This is an idea for them!
  19. +5
    18 November 2015 09: 34
    Quote: aszzz888
    So we’ll run in our new features. And for the throaty a good lesson.

    Are the Balts silent? Or how about a duck on the third day? Or do not have time to spit out the mericatos for everyone? laughing

    Not black mister mass Obama did not give them a command, and groaned that they say he supports ours. Well, that's all and closed the fountain, they are all so "independent".
  20. +5
    18 November 2015 09: 35
    Obama spoke like Russia well done, I always agreed with her actions and support them. So our president once again proved that Russia is standing on its feet. And they will have to listen to what Russia says.
  21. +2
    18 November 2015 09: 36
    But it seems to me that for ISIS, something older will come down, ammunition on the verge of disposal. Well, why do they need rockets with missiles with a range of 5500km? These must be reserved just in case. In other ways, you can apply once - for advertising.
    1. +3
      18 November 2015 09: 54
      This was actually done :)
    2. +2
      18 November 2015 12: 05
      Quote: midashko
      But it seems to me that for ISIS, something older will come down, ammunition on the verge of disposal. Well, why do they need rockets with missiles with a range of 5500km? These must be reserved just in case. In other ways, you can apply once - for advertising.

      Nothing raises the price and the reputation of military equipment and weapons as participation in hostilities.
  22. +2
    18 November 2015 09: 37
    The work is really impressive, you can even see in the video how cruise missiles are loaded in an irregular shape ... it’s not clear why if they have a range of 5.5 thousand km or so, a report to the T-160 president in the air lasted 8 hours for so much, then Tu-95ms took 9 hours so much ... why didn’t shoot from our territory like a Caspian flotilla
    1. +4
      18 November 2015 09: 46
      Well, it’s not in vain that the Tu-160s were called heroic names, they went out into the open field to show themselves, but eight hours is for everyone to make out properly. Again pilots raid and training.
  23. +2
    18 November 2015 09: 40
    That's right. To help Syria and at the same time test its weapons in practice, not in exercises.
  24. +9
    18 November 2015 09: 41
    Well, real, "Kapusin Yar" over the hill. But the main goal of this blow, not so much the IG, but on the psyche
    Western lovers of barking at Russia. They have not yet recovered from the "calibrated" shock, and then more abruptly.
    Well, Obamka, how do you like the "regional state" ?! Someone is scared, but I am PLEASANT!
    1. +4
      18 November 2015 09: 55
      Quote: askort154
      Well, real, "Kapusin Yar" over the hill. But the main goal of this blow, not so much the IG, but on the psyche
      Western lovers of barking at Russia. They have not yet recovered from the "calibrated" shock, and then more abruptly.
      Well, Obamka, how do you like the "regional state" ?! Someone is scared, but I am PLEASANT!



      They were not just scared, they fell into a stupor and quickly wanted to adjust their actions with the Russian Aerospace Forces.
  25. +3
    18 November 2015 09: 43
    Quote: Good I
    Information not yet confirmed or refuted by official sources.

    Submarine "Rostov-on-Don" struck "Caliber" on ISIS

    2015-11-17 21:17 События

    Russia today launched Kalibr cruise missile strikes against the IS capital from a submarine in the Mediterranean. This is the first practical use of such a weapon. By order of Russian President Vladimir Putin, this was the response to confirmation of the terrorist attack on board the A321 in Egypt.

    Peskov denied yesterday.
    1. +4
      18 November 2015 09: 57
      Peskov is a well-known denier, he has such a job :) For example - "Who bombed Washington, we bombed it ?! No, it wasn’t us, he bombed himself, while swearing in Russian and condemning - this is for Yugoslavia”.
  26. +1
    18 November 2015 09: 48
    Quote: Bayonet
    Quote: Bombardier
    I would like to use vacuum bombs in the mountains ... Yes, more so that the bomb was ....

    Click on the photo. Will this work?

    Well, it’s not necessary in the mountains. It’s good to smoke bulky from shelters, basement bunkers. Yes, and you need to apply, it’s all over quickly.
  27. +12
    18 November 2015 09: 50
    I live next to the former base of strategists in the city of Uzin. Climbed up and down. And he learned to bring down adversaries SSHA, in joke.
    I want to wake up again under the buzz .. stopped flying, I could not sleep peacefully for a month.
    URA-patriot, but I want at least the children and grandchildren to feel this drive. VIVAT - RUSSIA!
    1. -1
      18 November 2015 21: 04
      Quote: Barracuda
      URA-patriot, but I want at least the children and grandchildren to feel this drive. VIVAT - RUSSIA!


      And the ATO godfather, with whom you lacquer vodka, also yells "VIVAT - RUSSIA"?

      And he brought up his own children (how many of them are there? It seems four?), Also brought up so that, "Don't feed lard, give the drive to feel"? ? ?

      GLORY TO A DRINKED UKRAINE!
  28. +1
    18 November 2015 09: 55
    Quote: bentonit
    I can not get rid of cynical thoughts. Ships, submarines, VKS, long-range aviation ... POLYGON.


    we didn’t start it, but we should finish it !!!
  29. +1
    18 November 2015 09: 56
    ROD VDVshny
    Is there nothing secret in such fragments? This is kind of from X-101

    There is nothing secret here. This is not from the X-101. This is the tail section of the already old KR X-555. version with nuclear warhead X-55SM ..
  30. -7
    18 November 2015 10: 13
    Found where to use cruise missiles, they are actually used in very rugged terrain and from a long distance. How much money was lost. These missiles could be launched from Russia without the use of long-range aviation. And since they decided to train long-range aviation, the best application in the desert vacuum bombs. Arranged "shooting from cannons at sparrows"
    1. +1
      18 November 2015 10: 43
      Quote: njvlin
      Arranged "shooting from cannons at sparrows"

      Calm down, not the last day! Now the crews will have a rest, drink coffee, taxi out ..., get on a combat course and quietly "spud" the whole herd.
    2. -1
      18 November 2015 11: 45
      I agree with your opinion, but in this case, under the pretext of a war against terrorists, we seem to be demonstrating our strength to the West. How strong is our power is another question? Since the quantity of the West surpasses us in terms of numbers and technology, and the percentage ratio.
  31. PLO
    +1
    18 November 2015 10: 25
    By the way, the famous T-95MS video launches the X-55CM, not the X-555.
    either the Kh-55SM have the usual high-explosive warhead, or the launch frames from the Tu-95MS left from some exercises
  32. +1
    18 November 2015 10: 25
    With a range of flight X-101, they could be released from the territory of the Russian Federation. Or did our bombers leave the airspace of the Russian Federation?
    1. PLO
      +1
      18 November 2015 10: 27
      strategists say they shot back over Iran
  33. +1
    18 November 2015 10: 30
    So, Iskander remained, there were ODABs.
    This is from the shallow. Plus, we still had no new MLRS in Syria.
    It would also be nice to try. Especially in conjunction with drones.
    In short, Russia has shown that it is not going to let down the deaths of its citizens to militants.
  34. +1
    18 November 2015 10: 31
    There is no clear information on the types of ammunition accepted, except what V. Gerasimov said that on Tuesday during the first massive air strike by 34 long-range air-launched cruise missiles. But the video is video, without clear comments it is not clear. I look forward to more detailed data.
  35. +2
    18 November 2015 10: 42
    US President Barack Obama called Russia a constructive partner in the Syrian negotiations. It is reported by RIA Novosti.
    ... Here you have a real assessment of the VKS! )))
  36. +1
    18 November 2015 10: 47
    Russia warned the United States of ISIS missile attacks, while Americans sitting in Qatar warned ISIS of a Russian airborne attack .... ????
    1. 0
      19 November 2015 17: 45
      I think just 5 minutes before the arrival of the gift was warned laughing
  37. -2
    18 November 2015 10: 47
    range of 5500 km is with the YaBCh (it is easy), with a simple more than 2000 is unlikely.
  38. +1
    18 November 2015 10: 50
    Know ours!
  39. +2
    18 November 2015 10: 52
    The world again grabbed the compasses! By the way, long-range aviation seemed to be blunted from Iraqi airspace, and there is a feeling that the bins are being cleaned before new nishtyaks arrive. As for me - the ideal option for the disposal of weapons. Application for those against whom it was riveted ....
  40. AZA
    0
    18 November 2015 10: 52
    Quote: Bombardier
    I would like for vacuum bombs to be used in the mountains ... Yes, more so that the bomb was .... that it would be possible for the strategist at the limit of carrying capacity to drag it to the place of discharge.

    I propose to use a rubber bomb ...
  41. +1
    18 November 2015 10: 58
    Fine; under the latest combat missile weapons. good When else will such an opportunity arise? Well, hello to "partners". To stop the choral singing: "no army; rotten missiles, rusty tanks, warrant officers drunk, soldiers - dystrophic conscripts".
  42. +3
    18 November 2015 11: 06
    The second day I watch TV with pleasure - balm for the soul!
    Pay attention to how successfully Putin chose the time for retaliation - exactly after the terrorist attack in Paris ... And everything is correct and legal. And even Obama-arachnochok has no formal reason for condemnation! The French themselves are stuffed into allies.
    For military personnel - practice, ammunition and equipment - verification in combat conditions, which is better than exercises - has a positive effect. For our weapons - the best advertisement, for the country - the growth of international authority. - Everything is decorous and noble ...
  43. +2
    18 November 2015 11: 15
    The question is certainly interesting, but my friends, you seem to be a bit forgotten and do not remember that today most of the intelligence information of the world intelligence is drawn from open sources, and you here "flaunt" each other with your deep knowledge of sometimes secret weapons! What is important is not what our aerospace forces are bombing with these "bearded thugs", but what is important is that they bomb and fire and, most importantly, very accurately and methodically! shobloy "to the vastness of Europe! Glory to the Russian Aerospace Forces! Our cause is right and we will win!
  44. The comment was deleted.
  45. +2
    18 November 2015 12: 13
    Quote: BOB044
    Obama spoke like Russia well done, I always agreed with her actions and support them. So our president once again proved that Russia is standing on its feet. And they will have to listen to what Russia says.

    This rhetoric began to emerge after Putin announced how many countries sponsored ISIS and showed a string of fuel trucks in the photo and where they were going. After that, it seemed to be a bad thing for the world community and immediately began to point at each other with a finger and Putin immediately became well done and he and I are also good, that's such a parsley. But Vova, well done, after such a statement, you can not be shy about turning fuel trucks into dust!
  46. 0
    18 November 2015 12: 17
    Quote: Bison
    Pay attention to how successfully Putin chose the time for retaliation - exactly after the terrorist attack in Paris ... And everything is correct and legal. And even Obama ... has no formal reason for condemnation!


    All GDP is done smartly, prudently and edifyingly. His patience for negligent is sometimes puzzling, but the result always exceeds expectations. But there are spiteful critics with big stars whom this is not familiar to:

    Quote: The Cat
    And then there is such a coincidence, right before the "G20" there is a series of terrorist attacks in France and everyone forgets about the plane and begins to "empathize" with France. Outstripped Putin.
    And France strikes ISIS. And here you also have to strike, so as not to remain sucked in fools.
  47. 0
    18 November 2015 12: 54
    I heard from my ear that the x-101 could be launched with Iskander launchers, and the pact itself was capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.
  48. INF
    0
    18 November 2015 16: 04
    ... and are capable of covering targets at ranges of up to 5,5 thousand km

    The compass can not be reached.
  49. -1
    18 November 2015 16: 15
    But how much is such a departure?
    1. +2
      18 November 2015 16: 35
      what's the difference to burn fuel flying to the landfill or for real purposes.
      this can be viewed financially as "exercise" smile
  50. aba
    0
    18 November 2015 16: 24
    latest cruise missiles X-101

    Correctly! We must conduct full-scale tests of all the latest systems and weapons! smile
  51. 0
    18 November 2015 16: 42
    Let IS and the West know the heroic strength!
  52. 0
    18 November 2015 17: 38
    Quote: njvlin
    And since they decided to train long-range aviation, the best use in the desert is vacuum bombs. They staged a “cannon shooting at sparrows”

    Vacuum bombs in the desert??? “This is a new word in science and technology.” The whole point of a vacuum (volumetric detonating) bomb is precisely its use in urban areas, in areas where there are underground passages or caves, and not on level ground

    Quote: shinobi
    I heard from my ear that the x-101 could be launched with Iskander launchers, and the pact itself was capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

    The X-101 can be launched not only from the “launchers” of the Iskander complex, but in general from any mobile platform, even from a cart... Maybe it’s still worth teaching the “materiel” before posting such nonsense???

    Quote: Gormengast
    Great; testing the latest missile weapons in combat conditions

    Well, if you consider missiles of the late 80s and early 90s to be the “newest” missile weapons, then yes, they are testing the latest, ultra-modern...

    Quote: AlexTires
    The world has grabbed its compasses again!

    Who is the world in your understanding? MASS MEDIA?

    Quote: Mera Joota
    What interests me most is what exactly launched the Tu-22M3. They are not carriers of either the X-101 or Caliber, only the X-22 which are useless to say the least against ground targets.

    Threw regular bombs

    Quote: Samaritan
    Read how the shares of Russian companies soared after that! It's okay, it's high time to actually test these "toys"

    And what does this have to do with promotions when these products have never been supplied and are not supplied for export??

    Quote: The Cat
    They, like, have already launched three

    "Tundras"? Three jokes? There will be three in 2017. So far only one... If everything goes according to plan, the second will be in 2016 and the third in 2017
  53. 0
    18 November 2015 17: 38
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Oh well! Syria is far away! How long will it take for delivery ?! Better- "Topol-M", "Yars" .....

    Let's have a shoot with the Americans. Both they and we will fire strategic missiles. Maybe when you write, you should sometimes turn on a device like your own brain??? Any missile launch, if it has not been agreed upon in advance with another country, will be considered an attack. And no one will bother what his trajectory is. Recorded - start. Well, maybe if there’s a single launch, they’ll contact us via the hotline.
    And what kind of mania is it to suggest using everything that is available, including strategic missiles???

    Quote: Samaritan
    Alexander, a very interesting satellite was launched in Plesetsk (1st "Tundra"). Consider a new "era" of early warning system. Can you read an article ?!

    Wow. New era? Can you tell me what's new about it? Well, they launched an early warning satellite (which Russia didn’t have at all for a couple of years), what’s the new era???

    Quote: GOgaRu
    No. This is the X-55 or X-555 (externally structurally different by the presence of two small planes on the nose fairing). The engine is single and it is by no means used kerosene, but some very toxic rubbish to increase power. The launch is carried out by a pirostarter.


    Not only. The difference between the X-55 and the X-55SM and, accordingly, from the X-555 is the presence of additional, comfortable tanks. Moreover, the release from the bomb bay took place from such an angle and was so short that the option of considering small planes was close to zero. But the fact that it was not a “pure” X-55 is clear

    And for everyone who happily writes about the use of the X-101? You have seen the launch of the X-101 in at least one video. Even now, in the Moscow region, an experienced TU-95MS with b/n 317 flies with cargo loaders... And everyone is already screaming with ecstasy... Show at least one video in Syria with the launch of the X-101. Even the video that everyone is referring to is a cut from a dozen videos. Since on the ground one thing is loaded into the bomb bay of the TU-160, and on the video another one “falls out” of the bomb bay, the classic X-55) if viewed from a distance_ and X-555 if viewed close up
    1. +1
      19 November 2015 01: 00
      Quote: Old26
      And for everyone who happily writes about the use of the X-101? You have seen the launch of the X-101 in at least one video. Even now, in the Moscow region, an experienced TU-95MS with b/n 317 flies with cargo loaders... And everyone is already screaming with ecstasy... Show at least one video in Syria with the launch of the X-101. Even the video that everyone is referring to is a cut from a dozen videos. Since on the ground one thing is loaded into the bomb bay of the TU-160, and on the video another one “falls out” of the bomb bay, the classic X-55) if viewed from a distance_ and X-555 if viewed close up


      Why are you spoiling people's holiday?
  54. The comment was deleted.
  55. 0
    18 November 2015 18: 35
    Quote: SSI

    Maybe, but I haven’t seen a single X-15, and not a single Tu-22M3 drum ...


    Yes, I looked at the video, he just drops bombs.
  56. 0
    18 November 2015 18: 38
    Hooray! I rejoice!
  57. hartlend
    0
    18 November 2015 18: 58
    The news itself is good, but rather rotten. Only the lazy one didn’t write about it.
  58. 0
    18 November 2015 19: 46
    Everything is fine! It’s not an age to shoot at paper bags.
  59. +1
    18 November 2015 20: 58
    Quote: abrakadabre
    The official range implies work from Syria itself. Because (suddenly, in fact, it is Iskander can) if launched from the Crimea or the Caucasus ... This is such a howl will raise all the "partners"

    And most importantly, we, like that same non-commissioned officer’s widow, will flog ourselves. And we will show that we are violating the agreement. Moreover, this will not be an unfounded accusation of the United States, but we ourselves will confirm it

    Quote: jjj
    At one time, in order to save the Tu-22M3 from being cut according to an agreement with the United States, ours called it a heavy fighter. The Americans argued that, according to technical data, it was a bomber. And ours stubbornly proved that the Tupolev fighter turned out this way. And yet, they got their way


    And where did you manage to pick up such nonsense??? Fighter, damn it, you understand... And the Americans are so stupid that when showing the equipment they did not pay attention to such a very necessary detail for a heavy fighter as a bomb bay that can hold 24 tons of bombs. And they didn’t know, well, they just didn’t know that before that there was also a heavy fighter - it was simply called TU-22.
    Maybe it would be worth studying the issue before writing? To avoid writing nonsense? And if it doesn’t bother you, please read out the article of the contract under which we were supposed to cut down the TU-22M3??? I'd really like to know...
  60. 0
    19 November 2015 00: 57
    Quote: alex80

    Peskov denied yesterday.


    Be careful! Peskov did not deny, but did NOT confirm. These are different things. He said: “There was no report from the Ministry of Defense about the boat. Read the report from the Ministry of Defense.” He did not refute anything.
  61. 0
    19 November 2015 10: 34
    One big plus: Pilots gain valuable combat experience.
  62. 0
    19 November 2015 11: 56
    We reveal all the secrets.
    I wonder how many people there are rubbing their hands with pleasure!
  63. T62
    0
    19 November 2015 12: 47
    I don’t see the logic of sending long-range and strategic bombers to Syria and dropping cruise missiles there with a flight range of 5.5 thousand km.
  64. 0
    19 November 2015 17: 31
    Quote: T62
    I don’t see the logic of sending long-range and strategic bombers to Syria and dropping cruise missiles there with a flight range of 5.5 thousand km.


    Right! IMHO, on the contrary, ours flew for several hours in order to fly away from Syria to Kamchatka and shoot from there.
  65. 0
    19 November 2015 17: 39
    ISIS terrorist gangs deserve to be showered with new types of Russian missiles. Very revealing and instructive!
  66. 0
    19 November 2015 18: 12
    I am proud of our “strategists” and our air forces. They demonstrate a high level of professionalism and keep it up! Ours are the best! Maybe I’m a little emotional as a woman, but I know first-hand about their service - I myself come from the family of a “strategist”.
  67. 0
    19 November 2015 18: 26
    Quote: Bayonet
    Quote: Bombardier
    I would like to use vacuum bombs in the mountains ... Yes, more so that the bomb was ....

    Click on the photo. Will this work?

    I want to assure you that in the mountains any weapons of mass destruction are useless. Apparently the younger generation was not taught life safety courses in schools
  68. 0
    19 November 2015 23: 00
    Do I understand correctly that the role of long-range aviation is now decreasing, because such a missile can be launched from any cornfield from its own airspace? It even reaches the west coast of the United States from Kamchatka. And through the North Pole even to New York.
    1. 0
      21 November 2015 02: 04
      You understand absolutely correctly! They just forgot about the helicopters.
      And with the adoption of the new Rubezh ICBM, there will be no need for self-propelled launch systems.
      You can launch from any truck. Or a dump truck.
  69. 0
    20 November 2015 00: 50
    Russian strategic bombers used during airstrikes against IS targets in Syria, as it appears, the latest Kh-101 cruise missiles, reports Vestnik Mordovia with reference to video materials that have appeared on the Internet.

    MilitaryRussia.Ru - domestic military equipment (after 1945) | Articles
    http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/index-899.html

    Read here, it may help answer some questions.
  70. The comment was deleted.
  71. 0
    20 November 2015 10: 17
    From a cannon at sparrows. This is now fashionable and relevant
  72. 0
    20 November 2015 13: 56
    I saw it today, we were returning from Azerbaijan.
    Beautiful "birds" good
  73. 0
    20 November 2015 22: 58
    “The X-101 is capable of using modernized strategic bombers. “This “long arm” allows the Russian armed forces to hit targets in any part of the world,” the publication concludes.”

    Yeah, this is a clear reminder for those who encroached on our Airplane and for the rest too - Moscow has long arms, since the time of Yuri Dolgoruky!