Sinai-Paris, or Quod licet Jovi ...
During the week, a special interest was aroused by the observation of how the cross-border liberal get-together is trying to comment on the Paris terrorist attacks, especially in conjunction with the appearance of information from the Russian special services about the commission of a terrorist act on board a Russian airliner from Sharm-El-Sheikh to St. Petersburg. The word “cross-border” in this case is used due to the fact that in recent months, a considerable number of adherents of liberal views on life decided to move to the territory of, for example, Ukraine, continuing to sign for Russian admirers of their talent. And someone has not moved, but he is already writing for local admirers of creativity, not finding, as they say, proper attention on this side of the border.
Before proceeding to the consideration of the reaction of the mentioned gentlemen, just a few words about the attention of the State Aviation Service of Ukraine. After reports appeared that the terrorist act was the cause of the crash of the Russian airliner on the Sinai Peninsula, the Ukrainian office mentioned said: we are not going to ban Ukrainian airlines from flying to Egypt.
Initially, I wanted to break out on this occasion with a sort of conspiracy theories that Ukraine was supposedly confident in the “friendly intentions” of the terrorists, who seemed to promise that they would not “touch” the Ukrainian aircraft. However, in this case any conspiracy is hardly appropriate. - Everything is much simpler. For the Ukrainian authorities and companies in the first place is getting at least some profit. Security? - No, you have not heard ... The absence of a ban on flying to Egypt after the announcement of the highest level of terrorist threat is an actual continuation stories with MH-17. In 2014, Kiev was not interested in the safety of the sides, which he directed over the territory of fierce hostilities. Not interested, because otherwise many foreign companies could simply refuse to fly through Ukraine (which ultimately happened anyway), and Kiev would lose significant financial resources. The story of the Ukrainian desire, even at the moment when the air is permeated with danger, is repeated today.
Now back to our sheep, that is, forgive generously, to the liberals - after all, by mentioning them, the material began ... One of those whose statements did not go unnoticed is the employee of the Ukrainian radio station Vesti, the former host of radio broadcasts on Echo of Moscow Matvey Ganapolsky. Of course, it would be possible not to pay attention to this miracle of nature at all, calling its own listeners on the air “creatures and scum”, but not in this case. This, as they say, should not be missed ...
The fact is that Mr. Ganapolsky, who, in his own words, was asked to build material on the events in Paris on the Echo of Moscow website, revealed what, by definition, demonstrates in this man not just a liberal, but also a real opportunist . In the article “A lot of bad and a bit of good”, in which thoughts about the attacks of terrorists on Paris go, Mr. Ganapolsky comes to the conclusion that (attention!) It is necessary to strengthen security (read: the work of the special services) ...
Ganapolsky:
But he writes about the need to act proactively, about the need to work for safety and even fight for it, a representative of that part of the public who applauded Mr. Pavlensky, who, under the slogan of the struggle for freedom, first nailed his causal place to Red Square, cut his ears and pasted over the museum floor with portraits of veterans of the Great Patriotic War, and then under the same slogan decided to set fire to the door of the main building of the Federal Security Service - at Lubyanka.
This is what happens ... Liberals-opportunists are trying to combine the incompatible in their logic: to encourage people who are very reminiscent of the mentally ill, who have voices in their heads (or somewhere else) dictate the need to pour out a fury on the country's security system and on the country itself, and at the same time, declare the promotion of the struggle to build a security field.
But in reality there is no “cognitive dissonance” here. After all, Mr. Ganapolsky writes about the terrorist attacks in Paris. And this, in his opinion, it is France that can take care of its security, work on improving the activities of the special services. And Russia - no, no ... In Russia, the hero should be the egg-carrier and Pavlodsky dvogopezhigatel. In Russia, however, the “regime”, and in France, “democracy” ... The French, according to the transborder liberal, are supposed to think about security, and the “coloradian” Russia - in no way, you understand, once.
It is worth paying attention to the comments of other adepts of liberal thoughts and liver absorbers. One of these - Dmitry Gudkov, who boomed in Facebook Regarding the report of the terrorist attack aboard the Kogalymavia aircraft, the following:
Dima is waiting for an "order of total mobilization"? .. Is he afraid that he will be fished out of the soft deputy chair and sent to fight terrorism? “They'll shove a strategic bomber into the bomb bay - and ... hello?” Ahhhhhhhh ... He was scared as ... Of course, for Dima it is more interesting and profitable to travel around foreign lands to get the fire command and cookies for their implementation, and then there have to be “some kind” terrorist attacks, and even comment with Russian citizens.
As can be seen, here, too, the tone is quite in line with the tone of Mr. Ganapolsky:
terrorist attack in France - French President declares tougher fight against terrorism, readiness to amend the constitution, state of emergency, close borders, dispatch aircraft carrier to the shores of Syria - Viv, la France, crush a terrorist reptile, all things ...;
terrorist attack against Russians aboard Airbus A321 - the president announces toughening the fight against terrorism - ah-ah-ah, freedom of speech, human rights defenders, Pavlensky, the horrors of total mobilization, Tanks, kirsa, stop, somebody, these Russians ...
Years go by, events replace each other, the world is transformed, but only the liberal crowd (or sects) has a set of dogmas that remains unchanged. Two terrorist attacks (on Paris and on a Russian airliner) in all their glory demonstrate the degree of upwardness of such liberal dogmatism.
Before proceeding to the consideration of the reaction of the mentioned gentlemen, just a few words about the attention of the State Aviation Service of Ukraine. After reports appeared that the terrorist act was the cause of the crash of the Russian airliner on the Sinai Peninsula, the Ukrainian office mentioned said: we are not going to ban Ukrainian airlines from flying to Egypt.
Initially, I wanted to break out on this occasion with a sort of conspiracy theories that Ukraine was supposedly confident in the “friendly intentions” of the terrorists, who seemed to promise that they would not “touch” the Ukrainian aircraft. However, in this case any conspiracy is hardly appropriate. - Everything is much simpler. For the Ukrainian authorities and companies in the first place is getting at least some profit. Security? - No, you have not heard ... The absence of a ban on flying to Egypt after the announcement of the highest level of terrorist threat is an actual continuation stories with MH-17. In 2014, Kiev was not interested in the safety of the sides, which he directed over the territory of fierce hostilities. Not interested, because otherwise many foreign companies could simply refuse to fly through Ukraine (which ultimately happened anyway), and Kiev would lose significant financial resources. The story of the Ukrainian desire, even at the moment when the air is permeated with danger, is repeated today.
Now back to our sheep, that is, forgive generously, to the liberals - after all, by mentioning them, the material began ... One of those whose statements did not go unnoticed is the employee of the Ukrainian radio station Vesti, the former host of radio broadcasts on Echo of Moscow Matvey Ganapolsky. Of course, it would be possible not to pay attention to this miracle of nature at all, calling its own listeners on the air “creatures and scum”, but not in this case. This, as they say, should not be missed ...
The fact is that Mr. Ganapolsky, who, in his own words, was asked to build material on the events in Paris on the Echo of Moscow website, revealed what, by definition, demonstrates in this man not just a liberal, but also a real opportunist . In the article “A lot of bad and a bit of good”, in which thoughts about the attacks of terrorists on Paris go, Mr. Ganapolsky comes to the conclusion that (attention!) It is necessary to strengthen security (read: the work of the special services) ...
Ganapolsky:
And here there is hope. It is that everyone understands that you need to work on security, you need to fight for it - it is not the “starting position”. The starting point is violence — war, the campaign of someone against someone; someone's crazy idea that a crazy fanatic brings down on humanity. And mankind gradually comes to understand that the “peaceful world” comes only when you are ahead of the curve, when you realize that while the birds are singing and the summer breeze is blowing, someone who has mastered the madness is already calling the bomb timer. Be sure to cock.
But he writes about the need to act proactively, about the need to work for safety and even fight for it, a representative of that part of the public who applauded Mr. Pavlensky, who, under the slogan of the struggle for freedom, first nailed his causal place to Red Square, cut his ears and pasted over the museum floor with portraits of veterans of the Great Patriotic War, and then under the same slogan decided to set fire to the door of the main building of the Federal Security Service - at Lubyanka.
This is what happens ... Liberals-opportunists are trying to combine the incompatible in their logic: to encourage people who are very reminiscent of the mentally ill, who have voices in their heads (or somewhere else) dictate the need to pour out a fury on the country's security system and on the country itself, and at the same time, declare the promotion of the struggle to build a security field.
But in reality there is no “cognitive dissonance” here. After all, Mr. Ganapolsky writes about the terrorist attacks in Paris. And this, in his opinion, it is France that can take care of its security, work on improving the activities of the special services. And Russia - no, no ... In Russia, the hero should be the egg-carrier and Pavlodsky dvogopezhigatel. In Russia, however, the “regime”, and in France, “democracy” ... The French, according to the transborder liberal, are supposed to think about security, and the “coloradian” Russia - in no way, you understand, once.
It is worth paying attention to the comments of other adepts of liberal thoughts and liver absorbers. One of these - Dmitry Gudkov, who boomed in Facebook Regarding the report of the terrorist attack aboard the Kogalymavia aircraft, the following:
This morning is three news.
Putin signed a defense plan before 20, America tested a new nuclear bomb, and there was a terrorist attack on board A321 (...)
But the third news is expected, but no less terrible.
In two empty cases, I see warning signs: once they write, it means they read about it. With horror they are waiting for some order on total mobilization, on the commencement of entering an unlimited contingent and other rumble with the butt of armor.
(...) The third (news) - waited ...
Now any dummy causes horror. Suddenly it will turn out to be a signal rocket, after which only “hurray” and “for the Motherland, for someone”? More recently, this was not. And now we, trained by the Donbas, have climbed into Syria, news of the bombing (of course, the victorious ones) has become a daily reality. In words - everything is fine. But "in the eyes - anxiety", driven deep inside.
And now - she broke through Egypt.
This is very bad: because if millions wait for something, it happens already regardless of their will.
Putin signed a defense plan before 20, America tested a new nuclear bomb, and there was a terrorist attack on board A321 (...)
But the third news is expected, but no less terrible.
In two empty cases, I see warning signs: once they write, it means they read about it. With horror they are waiting for some order on total mobilization, on the commencement of entering an unlimited contingent and other rumble with the butt of armor.
(...) The third (news) - waited ...
Now any dummy causes horror. Suddenly it will turn out to be a signal rocket, after which only “hurray” and “for the Motherland, for someone”? More recently, this was not. And now we, trained by the Donbas, have climbed into Syria, news of the bombing (of course, the victorious ones) has become a daily reality. In words - everything is fine. But "in the eyes - anxiety", driven deep inside.
And now - she broke through Egypt.
This is very bad: because if millions wait for something, it happens already regardless of their will.
Dima is waiting for an "order of total mobilization"? .. Is he afraid that he will be fished out of the soft deputy chair and sent to fight terrorism? “They'll shove a strategic bomber into the bomb bay - and ... hello?” Ahhhhhhhh ... He was scared as ... Of course, for Dima it is more interesting and profitable to travel around foreign lands to get the fire command and cookies for their implementation, and then there have to be “some kind” terrorist attacks, and even comment with Russian citizens.
As can be seen, here, too, the tone is quite in line with the tone of Mr. Ganapolsky:
terrorist attack in France - French President declares tougher fight against terrorism, readiness to amend the constitution, state of emergency, close borders, dispatch aircraft carrier to the shores of Syria - Viv, la France, crush a terrorist reptile, all things ...;
terrorist attack against Russians aboard Airbus A321 - the president announces toughening the fight against terrorism - ah-ah-ah, freedom of speech, human rights defenders, Pavlensky, the horrors of total mobilization, Tanks, kirsa, stop, somebody, these Russians ...
Years go by, events replace each other, the world is transformed, but only the liberal crowd (or sects) has a set of dogmas that remains unchanged. Two terrorist attacks (on Paris and on a Russian airliner) in all their glory demonstrate the degree of upwardness of such liberal dogmatism.
Information