Military Review

Another An-148 for the Ministry of Defense

57
Flight tests of the next An-148 passenger aircraft, built by Voronezh aircraft manufacturers for the Russian Defense Ministry, began in Voronezh, the blog reports bmpd.


The first flight of the next (eighth) An-148-100Е aircraft built for the Voronezh Joint-Stock Aircraft Building Company JSC.

The indicated aircraft (reg. No. 61727) became 8-m, built under the contract from 2013. In total, the delivery of 15-ti aircraft is foreseen. The contract value was 18,4 billion rubles.

The previous (seventh) aircraft took off on August 21. In total this year it was built three An-148.



Earlier it was reported that in 2015, the Voronezh enterprise (VASO), due to problems with the supply of components from Ukraine, would be able to transfer only 2 aircraft to the military instead of the four agreed. It is possible, however, that the new (8) board will be handed over to the Ministry of Defense before the start of the new year.
Photos used:
Alexey Filatov / spotters.net.ua
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Samaritan
    Samaritan 17 November 2015 16: 01
    +9
    Great news! Slowly but surely!
    1. Bombardier
      Bombardier 17 November 2015 16: 03
      +6
      Sorry for the off top:
      American side:
      The Russian side warned earlier that the attacks would be delivered by cruise missiles from Russian ships, as well as strategic bombers

      RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/syria_chronicle/20151117/1322802807.html#ixzz3rko9WAxc
      1. vladimirZ
        vladimirZ 17 November 2015 16: 51
        14
        Here is a type such as AN 148, a high-wing, unpretentious to airfields, is needed for our civil aviation, a regional plane, the replacement of the old AN-24.
        This is where the money had to be invested, fully mastering the production of this aircraft and engines in Russia, and not in the "Superjet", which is limitedly used in our country due to low-lying engines.
        There would be no such problems in Russia with its civil aircraft now. But for this, it is necessary that the planning and production of civil aviation should be decided by professionals, and not by managers-masters of "optimization" and cutting the budget dough.
    2. Darkmor
      Darkmor 17 November 2015 16: 03
      +3
      Interesting - how difficult is it to replace the missing parts for the remaining two sides?
      Maybe it is worth someone in Ukraine to give up, and the details from AN will illegally cross the Russian-Ukrainian border? :)
      1. Coconut Tima
        Coconut Tima 17 November 2015 16: 17
        +4
        Supplies of components for the military-industrial complex from Ukraine will be completely stopped by the end of 2015, from NATO countries by the end of 2017, Oleg Bochkarev, deputy chairman of the board of the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation, said on Tuesday. Import substitution plans envisage by the end of 2015 to completely replace all supplies from Ukraine. At the same time, only two products will be replaced a little later, these are heavy, complex projects on engines for helicopters and gas turbine engines for the Navy, "Bochkarev said at the Third All-Russian Conference" Procurements in the Defense Industrial Complex ".
        1. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn 17 November 2015 16: 23
          +1
          Quote: Tim Coconuts
          At the same time, only two products will be replaced a little later, these are heavy, complex projects on engines for helicopters and gas turbine engines for the Navy, "Bochkarev said at the Third All-Russian Conference" Procurements in the Defense Industrial Complex ".
          A little later for the Navy, this is at best by 2017 hi
        2. g1v2
          g1v2 17 November 2015 16: 48
          +8
          By the way, who cares. Tass reported.
          A prototype of the new Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile has been manufactured, and airborne and flight design tests at the Plesetsk cosmodrome are scheduled for spring-summer 2016, a source in the military-industrial complex said. The start of the Sarmat missile tests depends on the conversion of the silo launcher at the Plesetsk training ground, which will be used for testing. The conversion works are scheduled to be completed by March 2016, and the first missile launch test is expected this month. ”
          It seems that soon (in a couple of years) the R-36M2 Voevoda will begin to change to Sarmat as planned. With which I congratulate everyone. drinks
        3. Orionvit
          Orionvit 18 November 2015 00: 42
          +2
          If helicopter engines VK-2500 and TV3-117 can be produced by Russia at the Klimova enterprise, or in Gatchina, then D-438 for AN-148 were produced only in Zaporozhye. I don't know if there is a replacement, but the supply of engines to Russia, and even to the defense industry, is regarded in Ukraine as high treason. Maybe it can be ordered through third countries, you can give it to someone else. Of course Ukrainians are greedy people, only a lot of Svidomo "patriots" who, even to the detriment of themselves and "their country", are ready to do anything to give a shit to Russia. "Motor Sich", a huge enterprise, can hardly make ends meet without Russian orders. I dare to suggest another option. You are better than specialists in aircraft engines in Russia, so lure them over to you, since they are not needed in Ukraine. They will only thank you.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. captain
        captain 17 November 2015 18: 20
        +9
        In place of that, which would develop its aircraft industry, developed someone else's. They ditched the IL, ditched the UC, ditched the technical specifications. They wanted to buy Ukraine with orders, they destroyed their transport aircraft, and now they are forced to rebuild. How much money was presented to Ukraine !!! Now they have decided to start the production of IL-112, IL-114, IL-96-300. And what did you think before? Started production of the upgraded IL-76. Was there really nobody to think with his head? Why create jobs for other states? How much money will have to be invested in recovery !!! And pensions cannot be indexed.
        1. Flinky
          Flinky 17 November 2015 18: 22
          0
          Will you continue to cry? Or will you start working anyway?
        2. Irokez
          Irokez 17 November 2015 20: 09
          +5
          Now they have decided to start production of IL-112, IL-114, IL -96-300. And what did you think before?

          Who are you asking this question to? Gorbachev, Yeltsin with a team of liberals or us ordinary citizens.
          Wise people say: - "Whoever asked a question knows the answer." So think for yourself why they were not built looking back at the past. And so to throw general phrases from what and why not. This rating does not earn themselves.
          1. captain
            captain 22 November 2015 18: 11
            0
            Irokez (3) RU 17 November 2015 20: 09. They stopped producing 96 in 2013, Yeltsin had already died by that time, I remind you just in case. Tu-334, IL-114 and a number of other models, our pilots offered to produce with us with 2000. Then Yeltsin was gone, Gorbachev lives in Germany.
      4. Alekseev
        Alekseev 17 November 2015 19: 08
        +2
        Quote: Darkmor
        I wonder how difficult it is to replace

        Quote: Darkmor
        Maybe someone in Ukraine should give a paw

        Yes, they themselves will gladly give on their paw, if only to sell components for this plane.
        What they are doing now, supplying parts, assemblies and assemblies through third countries.
        Quote: vladimirZ
        regional aircraft, replacing the old AN-24
        needed, but the An-148 replacement is not for him, but the Tu-134.
        The superjet may be a little more advanced as a passenger airliner, but the An-148 is better for the hinterland, especially in the transport-passenger version. Therefore, it is produced mainly for the Air Force.
        And, according to the test pilots of VASO, the plane is good.
        It is necessary to achieve the greatest possible localization of its production in the Russian Federation. Moreover, it is successfully operated by the Angara AK, in the recent past the Polet AK, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the special detachment of Russia and the Ministry of Defense.
        1. severyanin
          severyanin 17 November 2015 22: 57
          0
          Quote: Alekseev
          According to VASO test pilots, the plane is good

          A strange disagreement, they say - the plane is good, but some time ago the article about him was just the opposite - that the designers made mistakes in the design of the airframe alignment, and you have to fly with ballast located immediately behind the cockpit. Who to believe? And the plane looks really beautiful, IMHO
          1. Lunic
            Lunic 18 November 2015 02: 28
            +1
            The article was for Ukrainian An-178 ...
    3. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 17 November 2015 16: 05
      +6
      Quote: Samaritan
      Great news! Slowly but surely!

      Our civil aviation needs to be restored, I think they flew into boenga ....
      1. selbrat
        selbrat 17 November 2015 16: 08
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Our civil aviation needs to be restored, I think they flew into the boenga ..

        So I'm talking about the same thing. Interesting, but why are there so many passenger airplanes in MO?
        1. avt
          avt 17 November 2015 16: 39
          +3
          Quote: selbrat
          . Interesting, but why so many passenger aircraft MO?

          People are transported in comfortable conditions on passenger rather than landing airplanes, regardless of the flights and workload of civilian airlines, again in the case when the same civilian airlines do not have and should not have access to the transportation points and the airborne troops being transported. Or do you think aviation is only for landing ? A very useful airplane. good A kind of SUV, bought by the way Russia with all the giblets. 15 is not enough! In the USSR, several hundred Tu-134/154 passengers were used in the Moscow Region for various occasions.
          Quote: cniza
          Nothing, without snotty horses we find a way out.

          In principle, nothing complicated. But I am not aware of the issue of support by Antonov as a developer. Well, in the case of guarantees in case of replacement of nodes and mechanisms, the type certificate seems, or is called otherwise.
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Our civil aviation needs to be rebuilt,

          Unfortunately, this airplane is a direct competitor to the Super Budget request And so the car is quite decent good on the basis of "Cheburashka" turned out at "Antonov".
          1. FID
            FID 17 November 2015 16: 44
            +6
            Quote: avt
            But I'm not aware of the issue of support by Antonov as a developer

            They fix obstacles, each rivet has to be discussed, but the Voronezh guys are great, they stick like tanks. Already the chassis was redone in detail and something else ...
            1. avt
              avt 17 November 2015 16: 48
              +1
              Quote: SSI
              They fix obstacles, each rivet has to be discussed, but the Voronezh guys are great, they stick like tanks. Already the chassis was redone in detail and something else ...

              hi This campaign will now be the main trump card to push this airplane from passenger traffic. request
        2. guzik007
          guzik007 17 November 2015 16: 57
          0
          So I'm talking about the same thing. Interesting, but why are there so many passenger airplanes in MO?

          ________________________________________________________________
          Meehan, do you have any idea? Your dream will come true soon ... :)
        3. Irokez
          Irokez 17 November 2015 20: 11
          0
          I wonder why there are so many passenger airplanes for MO?

          So somehow such an idea came to me. I think, then to transfer to a citizen when everything becomes completely bad.
    4. Platonich
      Platonich 17 November 2015 17: 09
      0
      How ugly he is, horror is simple. Like a flying boot.
    5. guzik007
      guzik007 17 November 2015 17: 25
      0
      ALL ALL ALL ALL !!! Watch the news 24 !!!!
  2. cniza
    cniza 17 November 2015 16: 02
    +4
    Earlier it was reported that in 2015, the Voronezh enterprise (VASO), due to problems with the supply of components from Ukraine, would be able to transfer only 2 aircraft to the military instead of the four agreed. It is possible, however, that the new (8) board will be handed over to the Ministry of Defense before the start of the new year.



    Nothing, without snotty horses we find a way out.
    1. barclay
      barclay 17 November 2015 16: 31
      +2
      Just have to find. Aircraft will be operated in Russia. For this, spare parts are needed - domestic. It seems that this problem has begun to really cope. God grant!
  3. klimpopov
    klimpopov 17 November 2015 16: 06
    +1
    Earlier it was reported that in 2015, the Voronezh Enterprise (VASO), due to problems with the supply of components from Ukraine, will be able to transfer only 2 aircraft to the military instead of the four agreed.

    No matter what, I wish this machine to plow the expanses of the sky!
  4. Cook
    Cook 17 November 2015 16: 10
    +1
    Everything would be fine, but there are many Ukrainian components, including engines.
    1. FID
      FID 17 November 2015 16: 46
      +1
      Quote: Cook
      Everything would be fine, but there are many Ukrainian components, including engines

      About 80% of the components are our ...
      1. Cook
        Cook 17 November 2015 18: 30
        +1
        And the engines, or is it 20%?
    2. zennon
      zennon 17 November 2015 16: 52
      +2
      Quote: Cook
      Everything would be fine, but there are many Ukrainian components, including engines.

      I’m wondering what Ilyushin Design Bureau has been doing for a quarter of a century? Voronezh plant of it. What are we messing with?
  5. samoletil18
    samoletil18 17 November 2015 16: 14
    +1
    How joyful. But(!)...
    I’m already waiting for Ily new (-112, -114).
  6. Cartman
    Cartman 17 November 2015 16: 16
    +5
    We screwed up our silts and carcasses so that the Ukrainians give work. Now bites your elbows.
  7. marinier
    marinier 17 November 2015 16: 22
    0
    It would not be bad for more flight.techn.ka4stva, will accompany the article.
    But the news is certainly good.
  8. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 17 November 2015 16: 23
    0
    Well done, all the same, they found strength, opportunities to replace components from the Ruins, anyway the USA will not allow kaklam to cooperate with us.
  9. An64
    An64 17 November 2015 16: 29
    +3
    Four days ago, discussing the news "The media: the Ukrainian developers of the An-178 made a mistake when calculating the aircraft alignment," the overwhelming majority of reviews about this aircraft were not very flattering.
    Explain, are these different Anas (that one is in the transport, and the other is in the passenger version, I understand), or are the Voronezh Anes the same as the Kiev Anas?
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 18 November 2015 15: 29
      0
      In Kiev, the An-178 is made to lengthen the fuselage and wings. Centering shifted back. It is necessary to redo everything or 1,3 tons of ballast behind the pilot's cockpit.
  10. gg.na
    gg.na 17 November 2015 16: 30
    0
    Such a normal airplane! good Very nothing wink cute! yes
    1. FID
      FID 17 November 2015 16: 59
      +6
      Here is his cabin ...
      1. Marconi41
        Marconi41 18 November 2015 00: 21
        +1
        Quote: SSI
        Here is his cabin

        Comfortable, informative.
  11. james
    james 17 November 2015 16: 32
    +1
    Sorry, that is off topic. It's true? http://42.tut.by/473145
    I would like confirmation on topwar
    1. AUL
      AUL 17 November 2015 18: 21
      0
      Why not? Now that it is proved that our plane in Egypt was blown up, the barmaley will be crushed in all cracks and by all methods. And it is right!
  12. vell.65
    vell.65 17 November 2015 16: 36
    0
    Quote: Darkmor
    Maybe it is worth someone in Ukraine to give up, and the details from AN will illegally cross the Russian-Ukrainian border? :)

    I think even with external management for the rollback, they will drag the bald one too.
  13. sabakina
    sabakina 17 November 2015 16: 36
    +1
    I don’t know that we collect ANs ....
  14. Cook
    Cook 17 November 2015 16: 41
    +1
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Quote: Samaritan
    Great news! Slowly but surely!

    Our civil aviation needs to be restored, I think they flew into boenga ....


    For your information, about three years ago, Aeroflot, having included the St. Petersburg airline Russia in its group and optimizing it, decommissioned all six An-148-100.
  15. Michailed
    Michailed 17 November 2015 16: 46
    0
    We all can do it ourselves! Only political will is needed.
  16. msm
    msm 17 November 2015 16: 55
    -1
    AN must be closed as a class. Why is he better IL or TU? Worse!
    1. fazayek
      fazayek 17 November 2015 17: 12
      +1
      Proofs will be? Antonov always did the best trucks.
    2. FID
      FID 17 November 2015 17: 26
      +2
      Quote: msm
      AN must be closed as a class. Why is it better than IL or TU

      You confuse different classes of cars. IL-114 - turboprop, smaller capacity and flies closer ... All cars are good in their classes ...
  17. twincam
    twincam 17 November 2015 17: 10
    0
    Quote: james
    http://42.tut.by/473145

    Yes that's right.
    https://news.yandex.ru/yandsearch?cl4url=www.rbc.ru/politics/17/11/2015/564b0c32
    9a79475ee76092df & lang = ru & lr = 213

    http://www.rbc.ru/politics/17/11/2015/564b0c329a79475ee76092df

    The Russian diesel-electric submarine Rostov-on-Don, making the transition from the Northern Fleet to Novorossiysk, launched Caliber cruise missiles from the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea on targets in the vicinity of the Syrian city of Raqqa, the capital of the Islamic state banned in Russia ", Told RBC a source close to the Ministry of Defense.

    Now the results of the strike are analyzed using air and space reconnaissance. According to the interlocutor of RBC, the blow was made after the order of Russian President Vladimir Putin to strengthen the strikes against terrorists in connection with their involvement in the crash of the Russian A321 plane in Egypt.

    The purpose of strikes from the Rostov-on-Don DPL was training bases, headquarters, warehouses with weapons and ammunition, points of deployment of militant groups. The strike was carried out not along the benchtop, but along a ballistic trajectory at an altitude of several kilometers in order to avoid incidents due to heavy navigation in the Mediterranean.

    The launch from the Rostov-on-Don submarine was the first case of the use of cruise missiles launched from a submarine at a real enemy’s targets in the history of the Russian armed forces, the RBC source said.

    Read more at RBC:
    http://www.rbc.ru/politics/17/11/2015/564b0c329a79475ee76092df
  18. viktor561
    viktor561 17 November 2015 17: 15
    +3
    Quote: marinier
    It would not be bad for more flight.techn.ka4stva
    1. FID
      FID 17 November 2015 17: 28
      +1
      All extreme, after a / c "Russia", cars are produced as An-148-100E ...
    2. marinier
      marinier 17 November 2015 17: 32
      0
      BLagodariu, o4en appreciated.
  19. wicked pinnochio
    wicked pinnochio 17 November 2015 17: 22
    +3
    that you all cling to a superjet a normal plane flies produce Poghosyan spends his money on it, they gave Tupolev money in their pockets, they put the state tired of giving them every time, like Ukraine wanted to produce engines, then we’ll get these to Voronezh
    1. FID
      FID 17 November 2015 17: 29
      0
      And where will we take French engines with a superjet? Will Poghosyan buy for his money again?
      1. Samaritan
        Samaritan 17 November 2015 18: 13
        0
        Well, Sergey Ivanovich, with a stroke of the pen thousands of people from Saturn were offended :))) people think they’ve fought for 10 years, and then the French again :))
        1. FID
          FID 17 November 2015 18: 39
          0
          Quote: Samaritan
          Well, Sergey Ivanovich, with one stroke of a pen, thousands of people from Saturn were offended :)))

          Well, you will offend them ... Gazprom will not be overjoyed ... And as for the CaM 146 - this is the SMF56 converted by the French, they do the "hot" part, and we add a fan and hoods. I won't lie, but it seems 80 percent of the cost of the motor, leaves for France ...
          1. Cook
            Cook 17 November 2015 19: 02
            +4
            Probably all the same CFM56. I don’t know how about 80% of the cost, but the share in the joint venture is 50 to 50. But what is D436-148 actually better? It produces its Motor Sich. I was lucky to fly the An-13 for 74 years, in normal relations the Ukrainians drank a fair amount of blood, and now even more so.
  20. samara-58
    samara-58 17 November 2015 17: 25
    0
    Quote: Bombardier
    Sorry for the off top:
    American side:
    The Russian side warned earlier that the attacks would be delivered by cruise missiles from Russian ships, as well as strategic bombers

    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/syria_chronicle/20151117/1322802807.html#ixzz3rko9WAxc

    HOORAY!!! Very well!!!
  21. wicked pinnochio
    wicked pinnochio 17 November 2015 17: 35
    0
    Yes, we will buy until we learn how to do our own, we must learn to produce our own production no worse than phrase-makers
    then the cost will fall at times
  22. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 17 November 2015 18: 17
    0
    As recently, the Tu-204 and An-148 - everything for the MO. It's good! But when is it already for civil aviation ???
    1. Cook
      Cook 17 November 2015 18: 40
      +3
      When they build a full-fledged after-sales service, spare parts supply, they will make it possible to lease at normal rates. And they will prove in practice that operating these aircraft is at least no less profitable than aircraft of other manufacturers. All other, including prohibitive, measures, except for direct subsidization by the state of the carrier, will lead to higher prices for tickets.
  23. wicked pinnochio
    wicked pinnochio 17 November 2015 19: 32
    +1
    here some people like it says that there will be a lot of them about one airline Aeroflot, and then Aeroflot bankrupt the Tranaero and immediately raised the price for Vladivostok residents by 4 times, and they feed it sucks, only he
  24. Oleg 91
    Oleg 91 17 November 2015 20: 57
    +1
    And yet a beautiful airplane! And in my country, as always, everything was blown away ... Instead of building planes, ships together ... Eeeh ... what can I say ...
    1. Cook
      Cook 17 November 2015 21: 40
      +1
      Humanly, it will be very unfortunate if the Antonov firm is hidden. Often had to be in Gostomel and even at KMZ and KhAPO too. People just lived on their planes.
  25. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 17 November 2015 21: 36
    0
    Quote: marinier
    It would not be bad for more flight.techn.ka4stva, will accompany the article.
    But the news is certainly good.

    Eybrfkmysq ns xtk /
  26. atamankko
    atamankko 17 November 2015 22: 46
    0
    So little by little, we will revive our aviation again.
  27. tinibar
    tinibar 17 November 2015 23: 40
    0
    Quote: Darkmor
    Interesting - how difficult is it to replace the missing parts for the remaining two sides?
    Maybe it is worth someone in Ukraine to give up, and the details from AN will illegally cross the Russian-Ukrainian border? :)

    And what, their corruption will be steeper than ours. But who will allocate funds for this? And if they "sign" the budget, they will start to "cut" their own, or even an "international syndicate" will be formed! lol