Military Review

Seoul promised Pyongyang $ 63 billion for giving up nuclear weapons

58
If the DPRK abandons its nuclear program and sets out to develop good-neighborly relations, Seoul will "organize" multibillion-dollar investments in the economy of a neighboring country, South Korean President Park Geun-hye said at a G-20 summit in Turkey.




The President devoted most of her speech to appeals to the DPRK leadership.

"If North Korea refuses nuclear weapons and will embark on the path of openness and cooperation, we, together with the international community, are planning large-scale investments in the infrastructure of Northeast Asia, which will meet the demand for 63 billion dollars annually ",
cited Rossiyskaya Gazeta South Korean leader.

To ensure such a large investment, Pak proposed "creating a" Northeast Asian Development Bank ", as well as using the opportunities of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the newly created Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)."

The president appealed to the international community to support her initiatives.

Experts considered this idea unrealistic. Pyongyang has never discussed and is not going to discuss its nuclear program with Seoul. Rather, he will agree to talk about it with Washington, in which he sees the main threat to himself. However, the positions of the two countries are currently so far from each other that there is practically no hope for mutual understanding. And other countries and financial institutions are unlikely to agree to dubious investments in the DPRK economy - there are more promising areas in the world. South Korea itself, of course, will not be able to cope with the announced amount.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. izya top
    izya top 16 November 2015 14: 40 New
    +9
    fuckers around the corner
    1. Baikonur
      Baikonur 16 November 2015 14: 43 New
      10
      Yeah! Kim Jong-un won't do that! Throw away the magic wand! Yes, and his people, for whom the southerners are really enemies, will not have the impact of a shield!
    2. Bombardier
      Bombardier 16 November 2015 14: 43 New
      37
      And we were so divorced in the late 80s.
      Even worse ... for jeans, chewing gum and beautiful packaging ...

      And now the project "Ukraine" is being bred to "WE ARE EUROPEAN", as if Ukraine is from Latin America.

      So they thought in the USA - maybe the DPRK will fall for that ...
      1. Sasha 19871987
        Sasha 19871987 16 November 2015 14: 46 New
        14
        and the DPRK proposed 63 nuclear missiles to South Korea for refusing to cooperate with the states ... such news would have pleased us more ...
        1. Nitarius
          Nitarius 17 November 2015 07: 54 New
          0
          Yeah .. and all 63 missiles will send YOURSELVES TO SOUTH KOREA)))
      2. izya top
        izya top 16 November 2015 14: 53 New
        +1
        Quote: Bombardier
        And now the project "Ukraine"

        You are very confused. Now, if God has mercy and Europe is obsessed, the fuel rods will not fall into dill
      3. skeket
        skeket 16 November 2015 14: 56 New
        +6
        Quote: Bombardier
        So they thought in the USA - maybe the DPRK will fall for that ...

        and don’t forget, investment is not a gratuitous gift, it is investing your money in some kind of enterprise, that is, buying part of it. As a result, the DPRK will be without nuclear weapons, the country's economy, of course, will significantly rise and improve, but it will already belong to other people's uncles
        1. 34 region
          34 region 16 November 2015 15: 29 New
          +2
          Are you talking about investments in the economy of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya? They invested well there.
      4. bastard
        bastard 16 November 2015 15: 13 New
        0
        Quote: Bombardier
        And we were so divorced in the late 80s.
        Even worse ... for jeans, chewing gum and beautiful packaging ...
        And now the project "Ukraine" is being bred to "WE ARE EUROPEAN", as if Ukraine is from Latin America.
        So they thought in the USA - maybe the DPRK will fall for that ...

        Science fiction writer Paul Anderson has a wonderful little story called Helping Hand, one of my favorites. In the late 80s and early 90s, due to my youth and my naivety, I wanted Gorbachev to read it. I recommend to everyone who has not read a very interesting plot and, especially, the denouement.

        http://lib.ru/ANDERSON/RukaPomoschi.txt
      5. Manul
        Manul 16 November 2015 15: 19 New
        +9
        Quote: Bombardier
        And we were so divorced in the late 80s.
        Even worse ... for jeans, chewing gum and beautiful packaging ...

        Well, do not forget about the artificial deficit in everything. Meat, sausages were transported into the forests by trucks and buried in pits (people went, dug and ate. They themselves were treated to such meat) .. Visiting grocery cards. Lack of shops, lines in each department. And let them not say that the USSR was bad - the people were driven into a frenzy by the traitors in the elites who did not want to be party workers and live in nomenclature dachas, but wanted to be oligarchs and have their own estates.
      6. 34 region
        34 region 16 November 2015 15: 25 New
        +4
        And not only us were bred like rabbits. How do countries without nuclear weapons feel today? How much they were showered with Western investment! Already in Europe rushed from these injections!
      7. 34 region
        34 region 16 November 2015 15: 27 New
        +1
        If they decide to invest in the DPRK, then let them prepare for the flow of refugees from investments.
    3. 79807420129
      79807420129 16 November 2015 14: 44 New
      11
      But it’s interesting at what price she would offer to abandon US nuclear weapons.
      1. izya top
        izya top 16 November 2015 14: 50 New
        +1
        Quote: 79807420129
        at what price would she offer to abandon US nuclear weapons

        for staleness? belay Well, this is a banter ... but for the guarantee of joining the Russian Federation, I think, and would not bother
    4. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 16 November 2015 14: 45 New
      +6
      Delivery of investments immediately after disarmament, by ballistic missile mail of America! am
    5. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 16 November 2015 14: 46 New
      +4
      In vain they said it .... Eun now wants to take everything and can! The USA is losing ground around the world! And the DPRK, despite the blockade, turned out to be a very tenacious country and there is technology ...
      1. Vend
        Vend 16 November 2015 14: 48 New
        +4
        if the DPRK abandons its nuclear program and takes a course towards the development of good neighborly relations, then Seoul will “organize” multibillion-dollar investments in the economy of a neighboring country
        And in the load emissaries of the United States with a color revolution.
    6. fox21h
      fox21h 16 November 2015 15: 03 New
      0
      Quote: iza top
      fuckers around the corner

      Promise not to marry laughing
    7. vodolaz
      vodolaz 16 November 2015 16: 10 New
      +1
      Somewhere I've seen this before. And the Americans somehow offered us to sell Siberia. It seems like a trillion for 3, with the money they offered to give about a third and not immediately, but for the rest we had to get their goods.
    8. Maxom75
      Maxom75 16 November 2015 16: 17 New
      0
      Well, if the DPRK is led to this, then they are the khan. Look at Syria, hand over chemical weapons, well, Assad passed, and what became easier? And he would have fallen on the catacombs of the militants and would not have had to lose people.
  2. avvg
    avvg 16 November 2015 14: 41 New
    +5
    In Pyongyang, no fools are sitting, from the nuclear umbrella after the event in the Middle East, even ... will not refuse.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 16 November 2015 14: 47 New
      +3
      Quote: avvg
      Pyongyang is not a fool sitting.

      In Pyongyang, this will not be signed and drunk! fool
  3. marinier
    marinier 16 November 2015 14: 46 New
    +6
    Hello dear
    In my opinion, they are cheap. You can raise% 300.
    Well, then, as if forgotten.

    Obeshat does not know zentsia.
    , I do not intend to put the memory.
  4. roskot
    roskot 16 November 2015 14: 47 New
    0
    She guessed it or the exceptional ones prompted her?
  5. Aleksandr1959
    Aleksandr1959 16 November 2015 14: 47 New
    +1
    The abandonment of nuclear weapons by North Korea is beneficial only to the United States and, possibly, to China. In the case of the unification of the two Koreas, a practically very powerful state arises. North Korea’s nuclear missile technology plus South Korea’s technology and industrial potential will produce a killer mix.
    However, the positions of the two countries are currently so far apart that there are practically no hopes for mutual understanding.

    This is for now. Everything can change very quickly and unexpectedly.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 16 November 2015 15: 34 New
      +1
      Change like in Ukraine? East and west?
      1. Aleksandr1959
        Aleksandr1959 16 November 2015 15: 44 New
        0
        Change as in the situation with the union of the GDR and the FRG. The phrase about the attitude of the United States towards the unification of Koreas is not taken from the head. Some good analyst wrote a few years ago on this subject.
  6. Don
    Don 16 November 2015 14: 48 New
    +1
    What looks like Saudi tactics, they also promise tens of billions in exchange for the surrender of their interests. For credibility, they even sign an agreement of intent, and then stupidly throw it.
  7. kill the fascist
    kill the fascist 16 November 2015 14: 48 New
    +3
    Eun, the one who Kim Jong, I think, will not and will not lead to cheap promises. as long as there is a nuclear bomb - you're in the untouchable club.
  8. cerbuk6155
    cerbuk6155 16 November 2015 14: 48 New
    0
    There are no fools, start cutting yourself and selling your own. soldier
  9. ilija93
    ilija93 16 November 2015 14: 48 New
    +1
    I will buy a nuclear program!
    Well, or exchange.
    It is necessary, very.
    South Korea so far!
  10. Eragon
    Eragon 16 November 2015 14: 49 New
    +4
    As soon as they believe and refuse (from nuclear weapons), the DPRK will not be there right away.
  11. sa-zz
    sa-zz 16 November 2015 14: 51 New
    +1
    we are with the international community


    that's just what ochchchen annoys. It is clear that the "international community" will mean our overseas "partners" (as our diplomats put it).
  12. nemec55
    nemec55 16 November 2015 14: 55 New
    0
    The dead end development path of North Korea needs to be changed. I’m sure that our diplomats are trying in every possible way to change the country's course towards development in a friendly manner of North Korea with Russia and other countries, but not in the way they live now (this is a large paragraph)
    1. antiexpert
      antiexpert 16 November 2015 15: 34 New
      0
      Quote: nemec55
      North Korea's dead end road needs to be changed

      Yes, on the Libyan path, and South Africa - the very thing http://tannen.livejournal.com/66587.html
      1. nemec55
        nemec55 16 November 2015 17: 22 New
        +1
        You are trying to hang out now as a famous thing in the hole. For the gifted, I remind you that there is a development path for China India Russia Germany America Japan, etc. Well, damn it, turn on the brain
  13. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 16 November 2015 14: 55 New
    +7
    Seoul promised Pyongyang $ 63 billion for giving up nuclear weapons
    Jokers in Seoul however
  14. blind
    blind 16 November 2015 15: 02 New
    0
    Schaub, I lived like that. or maybe the Koreans want to fit me a little well, for example, for refusing to swear - I agree
  15. bmv04636
    bmv04636 16 November 2015 15: 04 New
    0
    And for Seoul, if we get along with Pyongyang, there is gas and a pipe too. laughing
  16. Lenin
    Lenin 16 November 2015 15: 12 New
    0
    For no haircuts, who values ​​independence so cheaply!!! Apparently, the next U.S. undercover games ... hi
  17. Prisoner
    Prisoner 16 November 2015 15: 16 New
    0
    The lackey decided to buy for the people's candy wrappers PEOPLE.
  18. antiexpert
    antiexpert 16 November 2015 15: 32 New
    0
    A ticket to a nuclear club - a ruble, a way out - a penny, they don’t take anyone back!
    This has already happened - in South Africa, what happened after that - read here >> http://tannen.livejournal.com/66587.html
    Also, the example of Ukraine is also in sight)))
  19. igorek4515
    igorek4515 16 November 2015 15: 41 New
    +5
    The dead end path of development of North Korea needs to be changed. I am sure that our diplomats are trying in every possible way to change the country's course towards development in a friendly manner of North Korea with Russia and other countries.

    Well, dead end or not, time will tell .. And then, why should the Russian or any other diplomats change the course of this country ..? Why not the North Koreans themselves ..? Or do you not trust them to decide what political course their country should take ..? What a strange manner of "exceptional democrats" from the outside to change the political course of this or that country .. So in Syria, "exceptional" as a mantra insist on the departure of Assad .. even say like let Assad leave first and then only fight against ISIS and other terrorists. Do not even hope, the Koreans are a poor people, but they are proud and they will not go for all these "gingerbread" from "democratic" South Korea .. And their leader Kim Jong-un even more so ..
    on the development of North Korea in a friendly manner with Russia and other countries, but not in the way they live now (this is a large paragraph)

    Do you know exactly HOW they live ..? Have you been to the DPRK ..? Or at least they saw objective and unbiased reports from this country and not propaganda "demlocratic" .. Well, then, how they live is their internal affair and if they like to live like this, then this is their choice and no one has the right to impose any other Lifestyle. Something like that..
    1. nemec55
      nemec55 16 November 2015 17: 07 New
      0
      And then, and with what fright Russian or some other diplomats should change the course of this country ..?

      I did not say MUST I said TRY (tobish do)
      And then there’s nothing to talk about.
      Have you been to the DPRK ..?

      Just believe it.
  20. anti-Semite
    anti-Semite 16 November 2015 16: 02 New
    +5
    in the same second as the DPRK abandons nuclear weapons and opens its borders a flood of liberals shit and other shaking biomass, human rights defenders who instantly raise a howl about violating the rights of jopasia and pregnant women will begin calls for the overthrow of the legitimate government, and in the absence of a deterrent in the form of nuclear weapons publicity will not be able to remain indifferent looking like a redhead trampling universal values, while in this world there is a United States nuclear weapons, though not 100%, but a guarantee of the survival of the country and people
  21. F.Vastag
    F.Vastag 16 November 2015 16: 06 New
    +2
    All this reminds the Old (and utterly relevant today) Soviet Cartoon: "AMBULANCE" 1949 (As the Overseas Mr. Boa constrictor (USA) - "Helped" hares, promising them 7 seven new Skins to get (for Free) and what came of it all (Reconsider on the same YouTube and you will understand everything.) The DPRK needs to completely stop any "Dialogues" with South Korean puppets on any issues (you need to talk about something Serious only with the Masters of the South Koreans (States), not with the Pawns.)
  22. mvg
    mvg 16 November 2015 16: 06 New
    +4
    Quote: Aleksandr1959
    The abandonment of nuclear weapons by North Korea is beneficial only to the United States and, possibly, to China. In the case of the unification of the two Koreas, a practically very powerful state arises. North Korea’s nuclear missile technology plus South Korea’s technology and industrial potential will produce a killer mix.
    However, the positions of the two countries are currently so far apart that there are practically no hopes for mutual understanding.

    This is for now. Everything can change very quickly and unexpectedly.

    Why South Korea vigorous North technology? She needs: cheap labor, plus a powder keg from under the ass to remove. And she has rocket technology, plus a peaceful atom, and is cooler than her neighbor, since there are no sanctions. In addition to the nuclear-free status of the peninsula.
    It’s just that Eun won’t do it. Why would he remove the CROWN from the head, especially since it (the crown) will be removed along with the head.
    PS: S.Korei need to bargain wink we, like, make vigorous missiles, and then we sell them 1 billion / pcs. And you destroy them ..
    1. anti-Semite
      anti-Semite 16 November 2015 16: 17 New
      +3
      if the Americans gain control over the entire peninsula, then there will appear both the state nuclear weapons and radars and the navy and the air force, geographically the place is ideal for attacking both Russia and China now there is a buffer in the form of the DPRK if it doesn’t become, we will get the most cannibalistic army of the world directly on the border
      1. F.Vastag
        F.Vastag 16 November 2015 16: 56 New
        +1
        So in order not to get the most Cannibal (American) army in the world near Bok (near Vladivostok), you just need to conclude an Agreement on Mutual Military Assistance and Military-Technical Cooperation with North Korea (by unilaterally removing all idiotic pro-American sanctions that Russia ( both under EBN and with GDP (in December 2013) it imposed on the DPRK following the lead of the US WHAT THE DPRK NEEDS (What they Want) - nothing at all, namely: MAXIMUM NON-ATTACK GUARANTEES: the US, NATO and South Korea on their Independent Country (for they have nuclear weapons and a million-strong army, etc.) WHO Can ensure 100% inviolability of the DPRK's sovereignty (from the United States and from their Absorption-Capture by South Korea) - only Russians and Russia (simply by concluding a Military Treaty (Russia-DPRK) on Mutual Assistance) and EVERYTHING (and all potential Aggressors (the States and their satellites) will immediately lag behind North Korea) What (or Who) prevents the same Russia from conducting annual joint military exercises with the DPRK (to develop-imitate the application of massive th Nuclear Strike on the States (and their Bases in Japan and South Korea) in the Pacific region (as they-the US conducts exercises to "capture Pyongyang" every year). Nobody (only lack of political will and determination). In short, if we Cover the DPRK with our Nuclear Umbrella (S-400 missile defense systems, Iskanders, etc.), then all Attacks (by the States and South Korea) on the DPRK (attempts to seize the DPRK by Force and be the first to attack) cease Instantly and the Tension on the Korean Peninsula immediately drops to 0 (because the Americans will 100% know that an attack (by the United States and South Korea) on the DPRK is tantamount to an attack on Russia and its territory).
        1. anti-Semite
          anti-Semite 16 November 2015 17: 06 New
          +2
          I completely agree I have the same thoughts about this hi
        2. JonnyT
          JonnyT 16 November 2015 17: 11 New
          0
          The North Korean regime is unpredictable, for it there are enemies around it .........
          1. anti-Semite
            anti-Semite 16 November 2015 17: 56 New
            +2
            they treat us and China normally, would you like to have a US army on the border instead of the DPRK? south korea this is not a country this is the us state they go to the toilet asking permission in washington and if united the americans will get direct access to our borders given their positions in europe and the proximity of bases in alaska we risk getting hit from all sides at the same time and if the states have their own placed not only in Europe but also in Korea and Japan it will be checkmate!
          2. F.Vastag
            F.Vastag 16 November 2015 17: 57 New
            +2
            The most unpredictable and dangerous (for others) regime is in the United States - the American Plutocracy (or "Bomb Democracy")
        3. Evgeny Khokhlov
          Evgeny Khokhlov 16 November 2015 18: 02 New
          -1
          Yes, comrade you are talking such nonsense, with all due respect to you!
          The United States and Kazakhstan will not attack the DPRK! It’s easier for the USA to have a frozen conflict so that their satellites Japan and the ROK are not arrogant.
          And tell me why Russia has a mutual assistance agreement with the DPRK? do you want to feed them for thanks?
          We need to look for normal allies, not parasites ...
          1. anti-Semite
            anti-Semite 16 November 2015 22: 06 New
            0
            and do you want to have Washington cannibals directly at the border, or is it better to have a buffer of 4 million bayonets armed to the teeth with sincere hatred of the west?
  23. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 16 November 2015 17: 07 New
    +4
    If Eun agrees, then he will be the last boob of Asia ...
    Now they are offering 63 billion, but as soon as the North Koreans destroy nuclear weapons, the southerners will demand all 100 ...
  24. Gomunkul
    Gomunkul 16 November 2015 17: 42 New
    +4
    If the DPRK abandons its nuclear program and sets out to develop good-neighborly relations, Seoul will "organize" multibillion-dollar investments in the economy of a neighboring country, South Korean President Park Geun-hye said at a G-20 summit in Turkey.
    And without mandatory refusal from nuclear weapons, can good relations be established in the right way? laughing
    1. F.Vastag
      F.Vastag 16 November 2015 18: 01 New
      +1
      This is not a "Renunciation of Nuclear Weapons" (which Seoul proposes) - but a Renunciation of the Sovereignty and Independence of one's own country (that is, in fact, a proposal to surrender)
    2. padded jacket
      padded jacket 16 November 2015 18: 01 New
      +2
      I think the Kims have long understood that giving up their nuclear weapons means being attacked and destroyed by the United States and its satellites and will not give up their hard-won "bomb" smile
      Which, in essence, is correct, because the protection from China is also not eternal and may change.
  25. Old26
    Old26 16 November 2015 18: 01 New
    -1
    Quote: Baikonur
    Yeah! Kim Jong-un won't do that! Throw away the magic wand! Yes, and his people, for whom the southerners are really enemies, will not have the impact of a shield!

    According to those who were in the North and in the South (both there and there relatives) southerners are not enemies for northerners (people). Of course, there is a fairly large stratum of crazy people who believe every word of Un and his government ...

    Quote: Sasha 19871987
    and the DPRK proposed 63 nuclear missiles to South Korea for refusing to cooperate with the states ... such news would have pleased us more ...

    Yah? Would you really be pleased with the presence of an additional 63 (at least) nuclear missiles at our borders ?? And in a country with unpredictable leadership? Well, you are some kind of masochist. From the series "spite grandmother frostbitten ears"

    Quote: skeket
    Quote: Bombardier
    So they thought in the USA - maybe the DPRK will fall for that ...

    and don’t forget, investment is not a gratuitous gift, it is investing your money in some kind of enterprise, that is, buying part of it. As a result, the DPRK will be without nuclear weapons, the country's economy, of course, will significantly rise and improve, but it will already belong to other people's uncles

    And now she belongs to "her uncles" !!! From the movement of the finger which depends to live or die, especially to those above. From whose personal whim another slaughter can be unleashed ...
    DPRK - sorry, but if not an abscess on the body of the earth, then the theater of the absurd. And most of all, only the population suffers from this, over which a social experiment has been carried out for more than half a century. In Soviet Russia, war communism lasted a decade, in the DPRK this "war communism" has lasted for 60 years

    Quote: MIKHAN
    In vain they said it .... Eun now wants to take everything and can! The USA is losing ground around the world! And the DPRK, despite the blockade, turned out to be a very tenacious country and there is technology ...

    Well, I could not take 60 years, but "from tomorrow will be able" ??? Don't tell my slippers. The DPRK is now an outcast country. One of the few countries with which she deals is Iran. But if sanctions are lifted from Iran, since the country has made a compromise, then the DPRK is not trying to do this ...
    And what will happen to the DPRK, "eat" they are in the South Caucasus - only God knows ... But the fact that neither Russia nor the PRC will "sign" for the DPRK is unambiguous.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 16 November 2015 18: 16 New
      +1
      Duc and Russia imposed sanctions! Are we outcasts too?
  26. Old26
    Old26 16 November 2015 18: 02 New
    0
    Quote: Wend
    And in the load emissaries of the United States with a color revolution.

    All right, American emissaries ... Here on parallel branches there were "specialists" who offered to deploy in the DPRK: S-400, Iskander, MiG-31, and almost Yars. True, at the same time they did not think that ours would be the same emissaries, corrupting the DPRK. Gadgets (if allowed to be held), talk about Russia and freedom (compared to the DPRK), when you could go to relax in a cafe after work or simply surf the Internet ... All this will be like rust to destroy the foundations of the DPRK. So here we are with the American color revolutions on equal terms ...

    Quote: kill the fascist
    Eun, the one who Kim Jong, I think, will not and will not lead to cheap promises. as long as there is a nuclear bomb - you're in the untouchable club.

    The biggest stupid thing you can think of. In the modern world, not the presence of a nuclear bomb in the amount of 3-10 pieces is dragged by a pass to the club of untouchables, but a massive number of such charges, and most importantly delivery vehicles. In the event of a military conflict, the DPRK will be bombed into the Stone Age, regardless of whether it has 3-10 charges. When she doesn’t have delivery vehicles - everything else is blah blah to the public

    Quote: anti-Semite
    in the same second as the DPRK abandons nuclear weapons and opens its borders, a stream of liberals shit at them and other shaking biomass

    They will not gush. You underestimate the current situation in the DPRK and so to speak "vaccinations" against liberalism. After the collapse of the USSR, Russia was more prepared to accept "Western values." The DPRK, in fact, is now a country with a brainwashed majority ...
    1. 34 region
      34 region 16 November 2015 18: 25 New
      +1
      Is South Korea not brainwashed? Is there high technology? In the confrontation of the USSR, you can give money and develop technology. But only in opposition. The USSR did not and the shop windows began to collapse. As a country, South Korea and Japan do not need amers. If desired, the United States can send them to the Stone Age. Why are US competitors? After all, all US policy is based on this (remove competitors).
    2. anti-Semite
      anti-Semite 16 November 2015 22: 11 New
      +1
      even now after 10 Yeltsin’s years, there are those who are stubborn for whom America is god, in this regard we didn’t go very far from ukrov there are also most sane and a bunch of zapadents came and turned the whole country up to the bottom
  27. igorek4515
    igorek4515 16 November 2015 18: 03 New
    +1
    And without mandatory refusal from nuclear weapons, can good relations be established in the right way?

    Nope ... The owner does not order .. :))) Well, the one who sits across the ocean ..
  28. Old26
    Old26 16 November 2015 18: 04 New
    -3
    Quote: F. Vastag
    So in order not to get the most Cannibal (American) army in the world near Bok (near Vladivostok), you just need to conclude an Agreement on Mutual Military Assistance and Military-Technical Cooperation with North Korea (by unilaterally removing all idiotic pro-American sanctions that Russia ( both under EBN and with GDP (in December 2013) it imposed on the DPRK following the lead of the US WHAT THE DPRK NEEDS (What they Want) - nothing at all, namely: MAXIMUM NON-ATTACK GUARANTEES: the US, NATO and South Korea on their Independent Country (for they have nuclear weapons and a million-strong army, etc.) WHO Can ensure 100% inviolability of the DPRK's sovereignty (from the United States and from their Absorption-Capture by South Korea) - only Russians and Russia (simply by concluding a Military Treaty (Russia-DPRK) on Mutual Assistance) and EVERYTHING (and all potential Aggressors (the States and their satellites) will immediately lag behind North Korea) What (or Who) prevents the same Russia from conducting annual joint military exercises with the DPRK (to develop-imitate the application of massive th Nuclear Strike on the States (and their Bases in Japan and South Korea) in the Pacific region (as they-the US conducts exercises to "capture Pyongyang" every year). Nobody (only lack of political will and determination). In short, if we Cover the DPRK with our Nuclear Umbrella (S-400 missile defense systems, Iskanders, etc.), then all Attacks (by the States and South Korea) on the DPRK (attempts to seize the DPRK by Force and be the first to attack) cease Instantly and the Tension on the Korean Peninsula immediately drops to 0 (because the Americans will 100% know that an attack (by the United States and South Korea) on the DPRK is tantamount to an attack on Russia and its territory).

    How many capital letters, how many emotions ...
    When was the last time the agreement with the DPRK was prolonged, do you know? Not at all under Yeltsin, or even under Medvedev. Suggest with whom, or guess?
    So, an article was removed from this treaty that Russia would provide assistance with all its strength in the event of an attack on the DPRK. Although the Chinese have prolonged the agreement with such an article, because of the "tricks" of the same DPRK are not eager to substitute ...

    Conduct exercises with the DPRK? And why the heck, tell me is it necessary? Do we have such a "brotherly" relationship? Can you tell me when such exercises were conducted over the past 60 years?

    The sanctions, by the way, were not American, but the UN, and Russia also voted for them. You probably think that is smarter than our president and the Foreign Ministry? NOT SURE.

    Quote: F. Vastag
    only Russians and Russia (by simply concluding a Military Treaty (Russia-DPRK) on Mutual Assistance) and EVERYTHING (and all potential Aggressors (States and their satellites) - will immediately lag behind North Korea).

    о MUTUAL ASSISTANCE???? And how will the DPRK help us? And thank God that this article has been removed from the new treaty ... We need it, this North Korea, to put the lives of our guys ???? Themselves eat there to fight ???
    Can't wait to unleash a nuclear war for North Korea ????
    1. F.Vastag
      F.Vastag 16 November 2015 19: 39 New
      +2
      The states along the perimeter of our (Russia) borders are constantly conducting exercises (and they are building Pros in Europe - for such Dummies as you explaining: "What is this against North Korea"). And on Hr..na the States (which did not dissolve the pro-fascist aggressive NATO bloc) are carrying out Exercises (and more than once) around Russia with their lackeys and Lizobies? Against Whom ABM ??? Against Russia - this is understandable to the Hedgehog. In Russia, in general (after 1991): No Friends, No Allies - Some Business Interests (for Oligarchs Close to the Kremlin), what do you think I am for: Deribaska, Abramovich, Rotenberg or Prokhorov (and for their Finances) or for you (to whom Everything is on the Drum) - I will put my Life (if the Russian Oligarchs do not Seriously Share something with the American ones (Rothschilds and Rockefellers). Yes, you would go to the Forest "Dear", since you (like you) are not going to support anyone ( and to stand up for anyone), then for you - Nobody Will Join: When the time comes to stay One on One with the Pentagon and NATO. And Yes, I myself will go there (in the DPRK) in case of a conflict and will protect those People (North- Koreans) like them (and not such subjects in Russia - like you) .And you sit and wait for the Ring around Russia to shrink tightly and come close - then the Americans will take care of you too. (but for you, for sure: Nobody will ever help (Traitors - including their own country (USSR) (as well as in the Memory of their grandfathers and fathers who Hold wu and created) - do not like anywhere (neither in Washington, nor in Pyongyang)
    2. anti-Semite
      anti-Semite 16 November 2015 22: 13 New
      0
      we need it as a buffer between us and the state of south korea
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. Riv
    Riv 16 November 2015 18: 15 New
    0
    Auch! I also have a nuclear program in the garage. Well, so far, of course, nothing explodes, but can I even have a millionaire investment?
  31. Weyland
    Weyland 16 November 2015 18: 58 New
    +1
    At first, Chekhov in 1938 was persuaded to abandon only the Sudetenland (where they had a powerful line of fortifications) laughing
  32. Old26
    Old26 16 November 2015 19: 03 New
    -2
    Quote: Region 34
    Duc and Russia imposed sanctions! Are we outcasts too?

    And you compare the list of DPRK sanctions with ours. And the DPRK is an outcast country not because of sanctions. She herself is a rogue country

    Quote: Region 34
    Is South Korea not brainwashed? Is there high technology? In the confrontation of the USSR, you can give money and develop technology. But only in opposition. The USSR did not and the shop windows began to collapse. As a country, South Korea and Japan do not need amers. If desired, the United States can send them to the Stone Age. Why are US competitors? After all, all US policy is based on this (remove competitors).

    And what about the South Caucasus joint chants to the glory of the president? if someone does not grieve during a certain situation, then does he, like in North Korea, use his fingernail? All the rest is talk, such as in the confrontation of the USSR, you can give money and develop technology. So the USSR has been gone for a quarter of a century, and the technologies in the South Caucasus as they were, have remained. Showcase SK even in the absence of the USSR did not begin to crumble. See how many South Korean household appliances we have (televisions, washing machines, microwave ovens, watches), how many cars. And after that, talk about window caving

    As countries, the South Caucasus and Japan are not needed by America and cannot bomb them in the Stone Age. Absolutely the same with our allies, especially on the southern borders. There will be no need for them, we will also bomb the Stone Age, so as not to leave competitors behind the back (or in the underbelly) for the future of enemies
  33. Old26
    Old26 16 November 2015 21: 00 New
    -5
    Quote: F. Vastag
    for Doodles like you explaining

    Rude, wise guy, no need !!!
    All unanimously say that missile defense in Europe is against Russia, but at least one was found that would prove this with the characteristics of complexes, radars and everything else. To repeat the political statements that are made to the public - a lot of mind is not necessary. You will earn dozens of advantages on this. But to answer, for example, against which missiles anti-missile systems are designed on Italian ships based in the Ionian Sea and on the basis of which missiles they are made - there are no willing

    Quote: F. Vastag
    And on XP..on the States (which did not dissolve the pro-fascist aggressive NATO bloc

    Well, okay. Then came the slogans. The easiest way to earn pluses. Keep up the good work and thanks to people like you, an excellent resource is gradually turning into a resource of miscellaneous materials and in terms of quality of comments it becomes similar to the yellow press or to the Censor ...

    Quote: F. Vastag
    Against Whom ABM ??? Against Russia - this is a hedgehog

    So you HEDGEHOG ???? Then prove with figures that you are against Russia. With the parameters of the radars, their location, with the parameters of interceptor missiles and their speeds. Then move on to the Franco-Italo-British segment. Do not forget to "fasten" the complexes in Turkey (and the radar in the same place). And to grind with your tongue - do not roll bags. To blindly repeat slogans - you don't need a lot of intelligence and ingenuity.

    Quote: F. Vastag
    for you (to whom Everything is Drum) - I will put my Life

    Of course, "On the drum." I "have an opinion" - and this is not welcome. And what about putting life. You say this so simply to a complete stranger that it seems that you will be the last one to come to the military registration and enlistment office, or rather, they will bring you there. You are doing well with your slogans, but I'm afraid it will be much worse with your business. Such "correct" ones, who know how to operate exclusively with slogans, are usually sent to where they do not return, such become ordinary consumables. That's when the slogan crap wears off (if they stay alive) - maybe they will make decent fighters

    Quote: F. Vastag
    Yes, if you walked the Forest "Dear", since you (like you) are not going to support anyone (and stand up for anyone), then for you - Nobody Will Join: When the time comes to be alone with the Pentagon and NATO. And Yes, I myself will go there (to the DPRK) in case of a conflict and will protect those People (North Koreans) like them (and not such subjects in Russia like you).

    have a good expression. DO NOT SAY WHAT I DO AND I WILL NOT TELL WHERE YOU GO. No one needs to intervene for me. At home, I can protect myself and my family. And believe me, not alone. And why are you when the war begins, only then go to the DPRK? The sluggish conflict is going on now. Forward. A flag at the hand and a drum around the neck - defend your North Korean comrades ...
    Forward, to the victory of Una in all of Korea !!!!!!!!!
    1. anti-Semite
      anti-Semite 16 November 2015 22: 24 New
      +1
      no omega wishes us well and their bases are not against us and their nuclear weapons are not aimed at us and they are not against us and they are not engaged in subversive activities and in the 90s everything was wonderful, we also need to dissolve the army and join the EU and NATO, because there pink ponies pooping rainbow! such as you were and met fascists with flowers in Iraq and afterwards realized that for the American it doesn’t make a difference whether you are for Saddam or not, their bombs are not sorted out who supporters of the states and who piss everyone for Iraq and if you think that the Americans will bomb exclusively the Kremlin and everyone else will be given ice cream, then I have bad news for you! whom will you protect when the marine takes you out of your door? what will you tell them? Like Ai Love America! Ay Love Obama !! Yes to chew them! you are for them an unterman who occupies the territory and the maximum that shines on you in the Western system of values ​​is the role of a slave and if you are lucky, did the example of Yugoslavia Iraq Libya Vietnam and the same Korea teach nothing? 10 years under the states in the 90s did not set their brains? we need a buffer!