Military Review
Sign in Sign up

British media: "S-400 air defense systems delivered to Syria." The reaction of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

175
British edition Daily Mailwhich, to put it mildly, does not specialize in military topics, writes that the photographs taken from the Khmeimim airbase in Syria “do not allow to doubt that Russia supplied the C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems” to Latakia. The publication reports that the photos were taken by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, who invited foreign journalists to cover the events taking place at an air base in Syria, from where Russian military aircraft take off.


The submission says that such images were published “deliberately” - in order to convey to foreign colleagues information about what weapons Russia can use in Syria.

The publication notes that the C-400 "Triumph" systems pose "a serious threat to NATO aircraft that perform antiterrorist tasks." A statement is made that for C-400 there is no such thing as stealth technology, and therefore C-400 is “threatened” not only by F-15 and F-16, but also by F-22 Raptor.

As a kind of evidence of the presence in Latakia C-400 "Triumph" the British media gives this photo.

British media: "S-400 air defense systems delivered to Syria." The reaction of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation


The official representative of the Ministry of Defense Igor Konashenkov called the statement of the British media about finding C-400 in Latakia disinformation.

Igor Konashenkov:
Before you frighten the British and the world by locating our C-400 anti-aircraft missile system here, you had to see what it was like at least in Wikipedia or on the website of the Russian Defense Ministry
Photos used:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Google News
175 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Engineer
    Engineer 13 November 2015 16: 44
    55
    From the same article as the pictures from the T-90A. A successful photo shoot came out.
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 13 November 2015 16: 47
      32
      Our Navy ships have been on duty there for a long time .. The cover is powerful! That would have more tanks! hi
      1. Temples
        Temples 13 November 2015 16: 52
        170
        A statement is made that for the S-400 there is no such thing as stealth technology, and therefore the S-400 “threatens” not only the F-15 and F-16, but also the F-22 Raptor.

        And here the Russians go against the rules:
        - the concept of "stealth" exists for everyone, but for the Russians it does not exist laughing
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur 13 November 2015 17: 25
          46
          - for everyone there is the concept of "moderate opposition", but for the Russians it does not exist!
          These barbarians even call us great and exceptional terrorists!
          It's a shame!
          laughing
          1. OlegLex
            OlegLex 13 November 2015 18: 34
            +9
            So we, too, do not think them especially for people, they are stupid people, so I certainly am not offended. I’m glad in principle that these wolves showed their faces from under the skin and now even the most inveterate Westerners can’t ignore it, and the Pepsi generation is coming out of suspended animation
          2. shasherin.pavel
            shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 09: 59
            +4
            Quote: Baikonur
            "moderate opposition"

            Paris! we grieve with you !!!! but it is the stupidity of your government to admit the "moderate opposition to IS". There is a political opposition, but there is no "immoderate opposition with arms in hand" - there are terrorists opposing the legitimate government and the popular will.
          3. 3axap82
            3axap82 14 November 2015 20: 26
            -6
            A sad audience here, you mocked them and they gave you the pluses.
        2. Sid.74
          Sid.74 13 November 2015 17: 28
          +6
          British media: "S-400 air defense systems delivered to Syria." The reaction of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

          Ty ... then there will be more .. wink
          RF will supply a radar system for one of the airfields of the Iraqi Air Force
          According to the source, the Russian equipment will provide radar control and navigation at a distance of 400 km
          http://tass.ru/politika/2431892
        3. papik09
          papik09 13 November 2015 17: 56
          11
          Quote: Temples
          A statement is made that for the S-400 there is no such thing as stealth technology, and therefore the S-400 “threatens” not only the F-15 and F-16, but also the F-22 Raptor.

          And here the Russians go against the rules:
          - the concept of "stealth" exists for everyone, but for the Russians it does not exist laughing

          Well, NOT RUSSIAN THIS WORD !!! drinks hi
        4. Simon
          Simon 13 November 2015 18: 13
          +8
          And, friends, it would not hurt to put the S-400 into Syria, NATO and the states immediately pressed their tails. Then a blooper appeared, so they already began to squeak. laughing
          1. shasherin.pavel
            shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 10: 11
            0
            Quote: Simon
            It would not hurt to put C-400 into Syria

            If it is impossible !, but they ask very much ... then they can put it down, otherwise they will kneel down, they will start beating with their foreheads: "Have mercy, Empress Russia! ISIS does not give us peace - he does not want to be a queen in Iraq, he wants to become a" queen of the world " !!! ". Russia will not tell them anything ... but why rush with words, if you can "wave" the Bulava.
          2. Gogia
            Gogia 14 November 2015 18: 15
            0
            Jews will crawl out of their way, but they either steal or love one another. There and the S-300 of the latest modifications will be enough to maintain morale. A pair of divisions and the whole of Syria can be covered.
        5. Vasek
          Vasek 13 November 2015 20: 21
          +5
          Quote: Temples
          - the concept of "stealth" exists for everyone, but for the Russians it does not exist

          Quote: Baikonur
          - for everyone there is the concept of "moderate opposition", but for the Russians it does not exist!

          - for everyone there is the concept of "democracy", but for Russians it does not exist (at least in the American concept of the word).
          1. fsps
            fsps 14 November 2015 10: 18
            +2
            Democracy is the subjugation of the majority to a minority, if it is beneficial for the United States.
        6. shasherin.pavel
          shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 09: 57
          +2
          Well, here we are not an exception: Serbia and Iraq also forgot to warn that invisibility cannot be shot down (this is very expensive for the USA) and therefore they shot down one at a time.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. GSH-18
        GSH-18 13 November 2015 17: 15
        13
        British media: "S-400 air defense systems delivered to Syria"

        Guys, if this is true S-400 Triumph, then it is clear that this is not against IS militants .. I think this is a standard cover for our airbase from possible threats.
        The publication notes that the S-400 Triumph systems pose a “serious threat to NATO aircraft that carry out anti-terrorist missions”

        This is not a threat to NATO planes, but a sobering shower for the frostbitten heads of the leadership of the White House, the Pentagon and NATO.
        You might think that on their bases in the region there are no air defense components!
        1. Throw
          Throw 13 November 2015 17: 23
          +7
          We know their "anti-terrorist tasks" 50 tons at a time ...
        2. Prapor-527
          Prapor-527 13 November 2015 17: 43
          +7
          Before you frighten the British and the world by locating our C-400 anti-aircraft missile system here, you had to see what it was like at least in Wikipedia or on the website of the Russian Defense Ministry Well, the S-400 looks something like this ...
          1. Prapor-527
            Prapor-527 13 November 2015 17: 57
            13
            More precisely, it will even be like this ...
            1. renics
              renics 13 November 2015 18: 16
              11 th
              Five weeks of Russian intervention in Syria: Russians reinforce C 400 Triumph in Syria. http://www.e-news.suWith 400 Triumphs in Syria
              1. The comment was deleted.
        3. Gogia
          Gogia 14 November 2015 18: 17
          +1
          This is far from a triumph. This is a radar survey for a military base. Own aircraft must also be kept.
    2. 79807420129
      79807420129 13 November 2015 16: 49
      41
      I repeat, on the Internet they found aliens from the alpha centauri, in Syria Topol M, and in the Sahara a submarine Borey, especially the British who are able to make a mammoth out of a fly.
      1. arane
        arane 13 November 2015 17: 14
        13
        Quote: 79807420129
        I repeat, on the Internet they found aliens from the alpha centauri, in Syria Topol M, and in the Sahara a submarine Borey, especially the British who are able to make a mammoth out of a fly.

        Actually, air defense is necessary to cover the air base! This is normal! What is the problem!

        "Threatens NATO aircraft that carry out anti-terrorist missions"

        Yes, no threat! Well, while they perform anti-terrorism tasks .....
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 13 November 2015 17: 08
      75
      I have proof too
      1. mark2
        mark2 13 November 2015 18: 47
        +2
        On board the aircraft, it would not hurt to register the side numbers and draw the stars to certainly show irrefutable evidence)
      2. Prometey
        Prometey 13 November 2015 19: 33
        +2
        Quote: Sith Lord
        I have proof too

        Thank you positively smile
      3. kolobok63
        kolobok63 14 November 2015 00: 40
        +3
        Vladyka, how much can you spread the old, old video? hi
      4. pamero
        pamero 14 November 2015 19: 30
        0
        Well, you really hammer ........
    5. renics
      renics 13 November 2015 17: 17
      +7
      T-90 in the Latakia region.T-90 in the Latakia region.
      T-90 in the Latakia region.
      1. renics
        renics 13 November 2015 18: 12
        +1
        Curious footage of the concert of the Blue Berets of the Russian Airborne Forces in front of the Russian garrison of the Khmeimim airbase near Latakia in Syria, spread on the Internet. The background is a Russian T-90A tank. Recall that satellite images of the Khmeimim airbase since the end of September 2015 indicate the presence of seven tanks on it, identified as T-90A, and apparently delivered for ground defense of the base.
        1. Artyom
          Artyom 13 November 2015 19: 27
          0
          The photo was not taken in Syria, this is for sure! All our planes in Syria do not have affiliation signs, only board numbers! Watch the video from the airfield in Syria.
      2. muhomor
        muhomor 13 November 2015 21: 53
        +5
        In the foreground, clearly an Arab! laughing
    6. Hammer
      Hammer 14 November 2015 04: 44
      +6
      I don’t understand, but what is the question actually?
      Well, let's say we brought in S-400 complexes to protect our contingent in Syria. So what?!
      We thereby violated some international agreements that are signed by the Russian Federation? Not?!
      And if they didn’t break, then the British went to the cap! And pi.ndo.sy with them!
      Here we have not yet reported to some Britain (this spit in the middle of the ocean) what and where we have ... Why does Konashenkov even say, S-400 is it or not. The answer should be simple - "even if this is an S-400, that's none of your business!"
      1. shasherin.pavel
        shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 10: 24
        +4
        “Why were the Iskanders brought to Kaliningrad?” Asked Shoigu.
        - "Our <Iskanders>, where we want, we put there!"
    7. Sterlya
      Sterlya 14 November 2015 12: 54
      +1
      really, not at all like even the s-400 laughing In sick
  2. Vladimyrych
    Vladimyrych 13 November 2015 16: 44
    22
    British media: "S-400 air defense systems delivered to Syria"
    Yes, we are in the know ... wink
    1. Absurdidat
      Absurdidat 13 November 2015 17: 01
      +4
      did not deliver
      1. swan
        swan 13 November 2015 17: 15
        +6
        Quote: Absurdidat
        did not deliver


        I agree. Installed at their airfield, to cover their air group. When the United States flies over the territory of Syria on the F-22, no one says that they put Assad fighters of the 5th generation).
        I think that we can safely go to the MTO point (in Tartus) on submarines with nuclear weapons and this will not contradict the non-proliferation treaties.
        1. Throw
          Throw 13 November 2015 17: 28
          +7
          The British themselves correctly wrote: they didn’t Syria, В Syria.
          They put themselves at their base.

          Any f * cked problems? wink
    2. remy
      remy 13 November 2015 19: 57
      +2
      what for run yep-tit ...
      military air defense is "
      here are the coordinates: 35 ° 35'37 "N 35 ° 50'53" E position of the S-300V4 air defense missile system
      and then everyone is silent ...
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 13 November 2015 23: 30
        +1
        Remy

        Who cares? If British scientists said the scribe. So this scribe.


        And this is very scary.
        1. amirbek
          amirbek 14 November 2015 08: 00
          0
          Quote: gladcu2
          If British scientists said the scribe. So this scribe.

          it's good that they did not charge the S-500
  3. PQ-18
    PQ-18 13 November 2015 16: 45
    29
    Well, delivered ... and the Britons have something to worry about?
    NOBODY called them to Syria!
    this picture DOES NOT indicate the apparent presence of the S-400
    all the more so since NOBODY will "light up" his position!
    (in the photo from left to right: P-19, PRV-13? Radar "Sky-M?"
    I can be mistaken by type, sorry!
    1. a.hamster55
      a.hamster55 13 November 2015 17: 05
      14
      Yes, this is a radar for controlling aircraft in distant areas of work. All-round station, altimeter and ...
    2. Passer
      Passer 13 November 2015 17: 10
      +6
      I could be wrong too, but in my opinion:
      35g6 (Caste), PRV-16 (13th will be more) and 19zh6.
      1. PQ-18
        PQ-18 13 November 2015 17: 17
        +5
        yes, PRV-16, 13 antenna wider
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 13 November 2015 19: 10
          +2
          Well, the fact that this is a landing radar is for sure, but in essence which of the British are interested in it, they have not written well that it’s Topol M
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. a.hamster55
            a.hamster55 13 November 2015 20: 08
            +1
            Please take into account that the "landing locator" is the RSP and is located directly at the runway near the center of its length. It has a circular antenna and a course-glide path. Designed for near and landing zones.
      2. kolobok63
        kolobok63 14 November 2015 00: 44
        +1
        A talker find for spy! hi
      3. eagle11
        eagle11 14 November 2015 09: 26
        0
        35n6, prv-16 and, oddly enough, an all-altitude detector 96l6, but it is not only in the s-400 air defense system, but also supplied to radio engineering units. Now, if the "gun" or "locator" were taken, then it certainly would not have gotten away.
        1. bannik
          bannik 14 November 2015 17: 16
          0
          Why should we "turn away"? Whoever "took a picture", let him turn away or turn out, as he likes best, but for now ... let them turn around.
    3. gjkrjdybr50
      gjkrjdybr50 13 November 2015 19: 15
      +4
      Absolutely to the point P-19, PRV-16, and something new, but not Heaven and not 19Zh6 and certainly not the S-400 MFRS. It’s on a wagon, and the MF radar has a BAZ tractor base. If there was an S-400, I would know for sure.
  4. iouris
    iouris 13 November 2015 16: 46
    +9
    How can the S-400 in Syria threaten NATO aircraft?
    NATO aircraft, which supports terrorists, threaten Syria.
  5. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 13 November 2015 16: 46
    29
    And if you enlarge the photo there in the background, the division of armatures dug in.
  6. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 13 November 2015 16: 47
    25
    British scientists have proven ... laughing
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 13 November 2015 16: 49
      13
      Quote: Dazdranagon
      British scientists have proven ... laughing

      The greater the pressure, the greater the resistance!
      1. shasherin.pavel
        shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 10: 29
        0
        The greater the pressure, the greater the resistance!
        In my youth, in a haymaking, a collective farm heavy truck stood up ... I couldn’t even say anything ... Then I thought: it’s good that the horse, not the elephant.
    2. a.hamster55
      a.hamster55 13 November 2015 17: 49
      +9
      Where are the serial numbers? Scientists give evidence with numbers - that's how Mendeleev!
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. papik09
      papik09 13 November 2015 18: 05
      31
      Quote: Dazdranagon
      British scientists have proven ... laughing

      And Russian scientists have proven that there are FOUR varieties of indifference:
      1. color - violet,
      2. geometric - in parallel,
      3. musical - in the drum,
      4. well, and of course the most important -
      anatomical - ... Well, everyone in the know)))
      1. PiP
        PiP 13 November 2015 19: 03
        +3
        Quote: papik09
        Quote: Dazdranagon
        British scientists have proven ... laughing

        And Russian scientists have proven that there are FOUR varieties of indifference:
        1. color - violet,
        2. geometric - in parallel,
        3. musical - in the drum,
        4. well, and of course the most important -
        anatomical - ... Well, everyone in the know)))

        5. Identity anatomy - Until pi__y.
      2. Starik72
        Starik72 13 November 2015 23: 24
        +7
        Pavel Ivanovich, but I forgot the indifference of an electrician = to a light bulb!
        1. papik09
          papik09 14 November 2015 03: 16
          +1
          Duc, this is the FIFTH view))) drinks
          But I think that he does not fit, because he is "electric", not "electric")))
          1. shasherin.pavel
            shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 10: 33
            0
            Quote: papik09
            that he is an "electrician", not "electric")))

            "And my daddy" to the lamp! "(How the arap married Peter).
        2. PiP
          PiP 14 November 2015 17: 47
          +1
          Quote: Starik72
          Pavel Ivanovich, but I forgot the indifference of an electrician = to a light bulb!

          Let forgive me, (banned) "And Us Rat" - this is ALL definitions / varieties of the word "indifference" hi
  7. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 13 November 2015 16: 47
    +5
    As if they don’t know what for every F-22 (35), we have something to oppose. Once these planes are already there, then they won’t fly there, that's all.
  8. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 13 November 2015 16: 47
    +7
    Still there is a desire without Assad’s permission to fly into the sky of Syria? smile
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 13 November 2015 16: 57
      -6
      Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
      Still there is a desire without Assad’s permission to fly into the sky of Syria? smile

      We are flying slowly. But only by exceptional necessity. repeat
      As of the morning of November 12, official Damascus does not comment on the publications of the Syrian and Lebanese media that the Israeli Air Force attacked the target at the international airport in the Syrian capital on the night of November 11. Official Jerusalem also does not give any comments.
      Note that this is the first possible strike by the Israeli Air Force on a target in Syria after Russia and the United States agreed on the actions of their air forces over the territory of this country.
      According to the photographs and videos from the scene published by the Syrian media, the air strike destroyed an arms depot or a convoy with weapons. Several publications say that they are talking about weapons delivered from Iran for Hezbollah militants fighting in Syria. Perhaps this weapon was planned to be shipped to Lebanon.
      Official Tehran does not comment on this information. Iranian media, including the Fars agency, cite Syrian publications without further details. In particular, it is noted that the explosions were powerful, after which a strong fire broke out, but there is no data on the victims.
      1. Alexander 67
        Alexander 67 13 November 2015 17: 06
        +2
        And in Google, is there no indication that quotes are taken in quotes. If you did not put the text in quotation marks, there is reason to assume that this information is from the category "British scientists found elephant eggs on the body of a fly" smile
        1. papik09
          papik09 13 November 2015 18: 07
          +1
          Quote: Alexander 67
          ... found elephant eggs on the body of a fly

          And the flies remained alive ?! good
      2. Scoun
        Scoun 13 November 2015 17: 08
        +1
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Note that this is the first possible strike by the Israeli Air Force on a target in Syria after

        how about it trumpeted ...
        Syrian opposition site "Al-Ittihad" and Lebanese site "A-Nashra" On the evening of November 11, they reported that the Israeli Air Force launched a series of attacks on Syrian territory last night.

        In addition to these positions, no one else wrote like that, and such positioners are no worse than Colin Paul))) can shake with a test tube only))) and not only report air strikes))
        1. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi 13 November 2015 18: 36
          +1
          Quote: Scoun

          In addition to these positions, no one else wrote like that, and such positioners are no worse than Colin Paul))) can shake with a test tube only))) and not only report air strikes))

          YouTube videos of the consequences. In general, I'm more curious that "Fars" also published this.
        2. atalef
          atalef 13 November 2015 19: 18
          -4
          Quote: Scoun
          In addition to these positions, no one else wrote like that, and such positioners are no worse than Colin Paul))) can shake with a test tube only))) and not only report air strikes))

          By the way today is the same
          Syrian media report Israeli strike on Damascus
          13 November 2015, 17: 19
          Syrian media have spread information about the Israeli Air Force attack on the area adjacent to Damascus airport.
      3. arane
        arane 13 November 2015 17: 23
        +1
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
        Still there is a desire without Assad’s permission to fly into the sky of Syria? smile

        We are flying slowly. But only by exceptional necessity. repeat
        As of the morning of November 12, official Damascus does not comment on the publications of the Syrian and Lebanese media that the Israeli Air Force attacked the target at the international airport in the Syrian capital on the night of November 11. Official Jerusalem also does not give any comments.
        Note that this is the first possible strike by the Israeli Air Force on a target in Syria after Russia and the United States agreed on the actions of their air forces over the territory of this country.
        According to the photographs and videos from the scene published by the Syrian media, the air strike destroyed an arms depot or a convoy with weapons. Several publications say that they are talking about weapons delivered from Iran for Hezbollah militants fighting in Syria. Perhaps this weapon was planned to be shipped to Lebanon.
        Official Tehran does not comment on this information. Iranian media, including the Fars agency, cite Syrian publications without further details. In particular, it is noted that the explosions were powerful, after which a strong fire broke out, but there is no data on the victims.


        It seems that the main topic of negotiations between Putin and the Prime Minister of Israel was Hezbollah and the supply of weapons to Palestine for them. And I think they agreed.
        Israel destroys caravans with weapons destined for Hezbollah to the Palestinian! Yes, and rightly so.
        1. atalef
          atalef 13 November 2015 19: 19
          -1
          Quote: arane
          Israel destroys caravans with weapons destined for Hezbollah to Palestinian

          Yes, almost 2 days in a row.
        2. atalef
          atalef 13 November 2015 19: 44
          +1
          Quote: arane
          It seems that the main topic of negotiations between Putin and the Prime Minister of Israel was Hezbollah and the supply of weapons to Palestine for them. And I think they agreed.

          Good evening Vyacheslav.
          100% are logged in, they understand everything perfectly. in Syria, Russia and Israel. their own, almost no overlapping goals. In the month that the videoconferencing in Syria, Israel bombed Syria 4 times, there was no news in the Russian media. Why? Clear.
          We do not bother you, you do not bother us.
          1. arane
            arane 13 November 2015 23: 25
            +2
            Quote: atalef
            Quote: arane
            It seems that the main topic of negotiations between Putin and the Prime Minister of Israel was Hezbollah and the supply of weapons to Palestine for them. And I think they agreed.

            Good evening Vyacheslav.
            100% are logged in, they understand everything perfectly. in Syria, Russia and Israel. their own, almost no overlapping goals. In the month that the videoconferencing in Syria, Israel bombed Syria 4 times, there was no news in the Russian media. Why? Clear.
            We do not bother you, you do not bother us.

            Greetings to Alexander! When I wrote the last sentence, I knew that they were throwing minuses. Something is not enough at all!
            I hate to divide into ours and ours in the sphere of terrorism! I am far from your showdown with hezbollah! But if they are such fighters for their freedom, even if they gather an army and go to fight with Tzahal, it will be understandable and honest, but to fire rockets from civilian residential areas of Palestine so that the answer would be there, and yell about the evil Jews who kill peaceful Arabs ....
            This is at least cowardice, not worthy of the warrior of Allah!

            But if it’s simple, it’s stupid terrorism, and terrorists must be destroyed in any manifestation and everywhere!
            I don’t see the difference between terrorists who are bombing Haifa’s buses, for example, and terrorists in Volgograd!

            And the people here distinguish .... they would work in the State Department fool
            1. atalef
              atalef 13 November 2015 23: 43
              0
              Quote: arane
              But if it’s simple, it’s stupid terrorism, and terrorists must be destroyed in any manifestation and everywhere!
              I don’t see the difference between terrorists who are bombing Haifa’s buses, for example, and terrorists in Volgograd!

              Vyacheslav !!!
              only respect and join in with your every word (nothing that we are on you?) word !!!! hi drinks soldier
              1. arane
                arane 14 November 2015 10: 39
                +1
                Quote: atalef
                Quote: arane
                But if it’s simple, it’s stupid terrorism, and terrorists must be destroyed in any manifestation and everywhere!
                I don’t see the difference between terrorists who are bombing Haifa’s buses, for example, and terrorists in Volgograd!

                Vyacheslav !!!
                only respect and join in with your every word (nothing that we are on you?) word !!!! hi drinks soldier

                Greetings to Alexander! Of course. drinks
            2. Balbesoid
              Balbesoid 14 November 2015 01: 48
              +1
              Dear old-timers! Not that flattery for, but out of my own understanding, I join your opinion!
              They gave the "meat" of the weapon and showed it the direction, but unfortunately for the "meat", it went wild and ran in the wrong direction! "Shepherds" (this is about the agreement of an unforgettable prime minister with an equally unforgettable one) correctly explained and reminded where you can run, where not! Further on the navigator !!!
              And, yes - the "Koran", in view of studying at the history department, was read. Like many other "holy" scriptures !!! It is not appropriate for a faithful to inflict punishment on the helpless (in this case, civilians)!
              Although, the most fashionable word is "context"! And from it, you can pull it out, then interpret it incorrectly ...
            3. shasherin.pavel
              shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 10: 41
              +1
              Quote: arane
              I do not see the difference between the terrorists

              УmeasuresA terrorist is a dead terrorist, because he is frommeasuresthey weighed, weighed and found unfit.
              1. arane
                arane 14 November 2015 15: 39
                +1
                Quote: shasherin.pavel
                Quote: arane
                I do not see the difference between the terrorists

                УmeasuresA terrorist is a dead terrorist, because he is frommeasuresthey weighed, weighed and found unfit.

                Well, with this interpretation, I agree .... laughing
            4. BARKHAN
              BARKHAN 14 November 2015 12: 19
              +4
              The fight against terrorism is an illiterate delirium. Diffusion of forces and squandering of funds. Let me explain my thought. Terrorism is not an enemy ... it is a means, a form of struggle, a method of warfare. So, you can endlessly fight "terrorism". Example-Israel ...
              But to fight with customers and performers of terror is the right move.
              If, for example, the same Israel razed its enemies to the ground, destroyed those who ordered the terrorist attacks, there would be peace. Well, they will never agree peacefully, because the plans are completely incompatible. Even if both sides are disarmed by force, they will cut each other friend with kitchen knives. Conclusion ... peace will come with the disappearance of one of the warring parties ... And, sadly, but true. History knows no examples of successful "reconciliation", years will pass and old grievances will be revealed.
              But a complete sweep from the population, no matter how cruel it sounds, the output is verified. An example is Kaliningrad, Karelia, Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands ... North
      4. AlNikolaich
        AlNikolaich 13 November 2015 18: 22
        0
        Aron, give a reference to the materials ... And then something goes out inarticulate ... Americans howl that
        Syria is covered by a radio-electronic bubble, and it is practically impossible to work. And then a strike by aviation
        on the capital’s civilian airport ... And they didn’t catch anyone and didn’t bring down ... It's unclear ...
        Was there a blow?
        1. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi 13 November 2015 18: 47
          +4
          Quote: AlNikolaich
          Aron, give a reference to the materials ... And then something goes out inarticulate ... Americans howl that
          Syria is covered by a radio-electronic bubble, and it is practically impossible to work. And then a strike by aviation
          on the capital’s civilian airport ... And they didn’t catch anyone and didn’t bring down ... It's unclear ...
          Was there a blow?

          Well, our officials do not say anything, except that Hezbollah is a terrorist organization and Israel will destroy its weapons, whenever possible. Our media reprint foreign, well, and significantly hint at sources in the Air Force. In general, today you can’t hide anything in the world.
          [media = https: //m.youtube.com/watch? v = kAwTqXrYbkA]
        2. atalef
          atalef 13 November 2015 19: 19
          0
          Quote: AlNikolaich
          . And no one was caught or shot down ... It is not clear ...
          Was there a blow?

          It was the day before yesterday and today
          1. figwam
            figwam 13 November 2015 20: 19
            +3
            Your fellow countryman.
            Russia did not impede the blow.
            1. atalef
              atalef 13 November 2015 23: 26
              +1
              Quote: figvam
              Your fellow countryman.
              Russia did not impede the blow.

              This only confirms my words.
              We and Russia have their own goals, we don’t overlap in them and Putin and Netanyahu agreed to not interfere with each other.
        3. shasherin.pavel
          shasherin.pavel 14 November 2015 10: 47
          0
          Well, it's like with "invisible" they were calculated against modern radars with decimeter waves, and on the old ones with a meter range, they are visible. "Bubble" he is from "smart" weapons, and against a conventional bomb or RS. dumped "by eye" it is not quoted.
      5. Cherdak
        Cherdak 15 November 2015 15: 47
        0
        Dr. Aaron, I respect people with a sense of humor.

        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        it's about the first possible Israeli air strike on target in Syria

        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        no data on victims.

        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        official Damascus does not comment on publications Syrian ... MEDIA...


        This is what I understand, stealth technology in action. It reminds the American "elusive Joe" and the 200 thousandth Russian contingent in / in Ukraine. Write more! bully
  9. veksha50
    veksha50 13 November 2015 16: 48
    +3
    Mdaaaa, recently something from Russia - some "signals" ... Now from a meeting with Putin, then from a base in Syria ...

    Maybe soon Nagliya and the United States will call off the coalition's "operation" in Syria on the green whistle ??? And it would be time to leave Ukraine alone ...
    1. FIREMAN
      FIREMAN 13 November 2015 16: 51
      +3
      After such a series of news for the week, valerian and diapers will soon end with amers with arrogant Saxons.
    2. papik09
      papik09 13 November 2015 18: 09
      +3
      Quote: veksha50
      soon Naglia and the USA on the green whistle

      hi
      Sorry. But, the right team is THREE GREEN WHISTLES! laughing
      drinks
      1. Senior manager
        Senior manager 13 November 2015 19: 46
        0
        Duplicate team - three black rockets in the dark.
  10. 787nkx
    787nkx 13 November 2015 16: 48
    12
    Ordinary iron RTV.
    Where did they see the 400th?
    1. Riperbahn
      Riperbahn 13 November 2015 17: 00
      +1
      Well, there were also PRVs in the ZRV.
    2. 787nkx
      787nkx 13 November 2015 17: 01
      +3
      I’ll clarify the airfield kit.
    3. figwam
      figwam 13 November 2015 17: 05
      +5
      Quote: 787nkx
      Ordinary iron RTV.
      Where did they see the 400th?

      Well, in general it seems that the radar from the S-400
      1. renics
        renics 13 November 2015 17: 13
        +1
        The radar system is part of the S-400 complex at the Khmeimim air base.Well then, this is a close-up, especially for Thomas neve-oh.
        The radar system is part of the S-400 complex at the Khmeimim air base.
        1. AlNikolaich
          AlNikolaich 13 November 2015 18: 28
          0
          And what kind of photo? Not the fact that this is Khmeinim and Syria!
          Like not the fact that C-400 ...
  11. Vadim Zhivov
    Vadim Zhivov 13 November 2015 16: 52
    +4
    With such news, but from the Naglia, and for Our Power it’s not a shame !!!!! +++++ fellow
  12. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 13 November 2015 16: 56
    +1
    They are afraid, then respected. And there’s nothing to fly to where they didn’t call. And then they took the style, do not ask to break. Bomb anyone. Everything ends with an era of impunity insolence.
  13. sisa29
    sisa29 13 November 2015 16: 57
    +3
    What's the problem? Well put and what, then what matters! So far, you haven’t received on the slope that you should raise the screech?
  14. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 13 November 2015 16: 59
    +3
    Someday, photojournalists will post pictures where burning New York will be in the background. Then they will draw something again.
    And to prove that this is true can, once again, "British scientists" ...
  15. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 13 November 2015 17: 00
    +1
    Fear has big eyes. We can also pump the S-500.
  16. Aroma77
    Aroma77 13 November 2015 17: 00
    +1
    “Some reports about our air base, which regularly appear in foreign publications, cause, if not laughter, then sincere bewilderment. I would like to believe that these fables are published for self-promotion purposes, ”Konashenkov commented on a message in the British newspaper The Daily Mail stating that the latest S-400 air defense system was allegedly located at Khmeimim airbase in Syria.
    “Before scaring the British and the world with the deployment of our S-400 anti-aircraft missile system here, we had to see what it was like at least on Wikipedia or on the website of the Russian Ministry of Defense,” the general noted. According to him, then the editors of this publication would be clear from how many elements this complex consists of, and what area would be required for its placement.
    “Together with you, we have been working at the Khmeimim airbase for the third day. You were given the opportunity to see everything here with your own eyes. Including facilities that provide air defense base. No S-400 here, of course, was not and is not. This is just misinformation, ”Konashenkov added.
  17. raid14
    raid14 13 November 2015 17: 01
    +7
    "Fear has big eyes"!
    1. Rash
      Rash 13 November 2015 20: 36
      0
      They have no fear, they have arrogant rude trolling.
  18. Stinger
    Stinger 13 November 2015 17: 01
    +2
    The publication notes that the S-400 Triumph systems pose a “serious threat to NATO aircraft that carry out anti-terrorist missions”

    Read: "Who are dropping the weapons of the moderate opposition"
  19. rus-5819
    rus-5819 13 November 2015 17: 01
    +3
    Quote: Temples
    A statement is made that for the S-400 there is no such thing as stealth technology, and therefore the S-400 “threatens” not only the F-15 and F-16, but also the F-22 Raptor.

    And here the Russians go against the rules:
    - the concept of "stealth" exists for everyone, but for the Russians it does not exist laughing

    And since you don’t fly airplanes ... the USA, especially since you are there did not invite unlike Russia.
  20. Dezinto
    Dezinto 13 November 2015 17: 03
    15
    What is needed there for the effective work of the videoconferencing then it will stand and will be! Angles what questions?

    You thought we were joking there ???

    1. Strezhevchanin
      Strezhevchanin 13 November 2015 18: 19
      +1
      Fighting picnic kote !!!!? Well, it's just no way. Yap also dumped in Turkey.
  21. 1536
    1536 13 November 2015 17: 08
    +3
    And what should I put? Catapult throwing Greek fire, or wall-hung guns? Do not be terrorists and no weapons against you, gentlemen of the British, will be used.
  22. Redman
    Redman 13 November 2015 17: 09
    +2
    Whether they are there or not (for now), but these weapons are already morally corrupting the enemy!
  23. Lenin
    Lenin 13 November 2015 17: 10
    +1
    Do not close to fly to our airfields.. hi
  24. 71rus
    71rus 13 November 2015 17: 11
    0
    The publication notes that the S-400 Triumph systems pose a "serious threat to NATO aircraft that perform anti-terrorist missions."

    There is an old Soviet song with these words:
    We are peaceful people, but our armored train stands on a siding!
  25. 178
    178 13 November 2015 17: 12
    0
    They have glitches. And fear, as you know, has big eyes. This is not the S-400 - This is Che (paparapapa) -Bu (paparapapa) -R A W (paparapapa) - Ka (paparapapa).
  26. Alexasmi
    Alexasmi 13 November 2015 17: 12
    +2
    Quote: figvam
    Quote: 787nkx
    Ordinary iron RTV.
    Where did they see the 400th?

    Well, in general it seems that the S-400

    Well, actually, on your photo there is a BBO (high-altitude detector) with energy that can cling to four hundred and three hundred, etc.
  27. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 13 November 2015 17: 13
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Quote: Dazdranagon
    British scientists have proven ... laughing

    The greater the pressure, the greater the resistance!


    Sir Isaac proved yes, it is. Ay, as they crushed it, it’s somehow embarrassing to even take the painful one. Then wash yourself off for "inappropriate use of force." By the way, can anyone explain this logical PERFORMANCE?
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 13 November 2015 17: 25
      +3
      Quote: iliitch
      By the way, will someone explain this logical OPERATION?

      "This vyper" ..)))) I explain: YOUR LAWS DO NOT APPLY FOR RUSSIANS! ... Got it clear? laughing
  28. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 13 November 2015 17: 16
    +2
    Maybe something did not understand, Dear colleagues. And where is the photograph of the S-400? The first and second stations from left to right are the stations of the flight support complex. I really don’t know the third, a long time ago on the dog, but I rummaged on the site, and those photos that have the S-400 are somehow not at all such antenna posts. Maybe a dumb English fake. request
  29. _my opinion
    _my opinion 13 November 2015 17: 17
    +1
    British media: "S-400 air defense systems delivered to Syria".

    and why not S-500 laughing to lie so much in full ...
  30. lozman
    lozman 13 November 2015 17: 22
    +1
    Even if this is so, so what?
  31. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 13 November 2015 17: 24
    +1
    So what? If high-ranking donkeys from the USA urge to bomb, shoot and not
    letting Russians in Syria, do we have the right to self-defense? S-400 is not offensive
    weapons, not threatening, but warns: go to hell!
  32. afrikanez
    afrikanez 13 November 2015 17: 24
    0
    The question is, why the hell should I let journalists go to the base? Are there many of our reporters at their bases? stop
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 13 November 2015 20: 58
      0
      Well, here is what our military men can be suspected of, but not naivety. If they launched a magazine, it means they wanted to convey something to their Western colleagues, and by the way the discussion that developed about the presence or absence of the s-400, a clear confirmation.
  33. Sasha_Sar
    Sasha_Sar 13 November 2015 17: 24
    +2
    So they refused to bomb ISIS, parliament against.
  34. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 13 November 2015 17: 29
    0
    Quote: sisa29
    What's the problem? Well put and what, then what matters! So far, you haven’t received on the slope that you should raise the screech?


    They have a sniffed smell, they knowingly feel it, they will hound - they will receive and swallow it, they will not go anywhere. Inertia of thinking, however. Russia has already been counted for Honduras, but here the equation is not solved - the discriminant is not equal to zero, it's complicated. An ambush with the Nepapuans have not yet fought.
  35. Igluxnumx
    Igluxnumx 13 November 2015 17: 31
    +1
    "The publication notes that the S-400 Triumph complexes pose a" serious threat to NATO aircraft that carry out anti-terrorist missions. "
    That’s the thing - flying wherever you want and bombing anyone horrible becomes unsafe! So we warned you so many times! An impudent. And entim, because of the puddle .... Well, so we are not really against it - fly! Maybe nothing will happen if you are lucky, of course!
  36. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 13 November 2015 17: 34
    0
    As you can’t see the C400 is not visible, the locators are yes. Or again, their idiots, their brains are dusting?
    1. renics
      renics 13 November 2015 18: 00
      0
      You can compare with the photo and with a complete set.
  37. roskot
    roskot 13 November 2015 17: 35
    0
    The British, with their five cents, also contribute to the panic bank. Hysteria went for a walk.
  38. BOB044
    BOB044 13 November 2015 17: 38
    0
    Fear has big eyes. Behind each shelf stuck in the ground see S-400. fool
  39. Sibiryak13
    Sibiryak13 13 November 2015 17: 44
    0
    And what a dog thing they are, what we put there. We are there by invitation, but why are they?
  40. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
    Vladimir Pozlnyakov 13 November 2015 17: 54
    0
    And to EUROPOIDS, NAGLOSAKS and other PSACs, everything is "on the drum"! The main thing is to throw in the DESU, and there, with a link to it, the corrupt media will trumpet the whole world! And at a political show, some MIKD BOM, sticking out LAMB'S EYES, will prove that the S-400, according to the evidence of numerous newspapers and magazines, the Russians have installed in Damascus at every intersection and have already killed hundreds of civilians!
  41. slizhov
    slizhov 13 November 2015 17: 58
    0
    So what stir ... screeched ..?
    THIS is "in German - tsatski stoves, and in Russian - a sandwich !!!"
  42. Stiletto
    Stiletto 13 November 2015 18: 03
    +1
    But in vain Konashenkov began to disappoint them. Let them sit and shake with fear. Moreover, I would also hint that there are S-500s there. In stealth version. From the series "Do you see a gopher? No? And he is!"
  43. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 13 November 2015 18: 05
    0
    "The publication notes that the S-400 Triumph systems pose a" serious threat to NATO aircraft, which perform anti-terrorist missions. "The statement is made that there is no such thing as stealth technology for the S-400, and therefore S The -400 threatens not only the F-15 and F-16, but also the F-22 Raptor. "
    It would be nice if they were there. And why did Konashenkov walk his boots so in a dream? sad
    And it would not hurt to put it, and it would not hurt to try it in business either. Until the "test site" is closed, it would be possible to combine useful with practice, well, let not the S-400, so the S-300 at least. bully
  44. Abrekkos
    Abrekkos 13 November 2015 18: 12
    0
    In my humble opinion, there is no C400 in Syria.
    At least a month ago there was nothing like this on the base.
    What is circled in the photo is part of a common target designation system.
    And why in Syria the S-400? Against who?
    Against the Americans? So they have F22, to shoot down or at least scare them one C-400 is not enough. It is necessary to deploy a positional area (they will not fly directly almost over the base). But in today's Syria, it is impossible to deploy a positional area without great risk. Anyway, the S-400 for those conditions is a re-sized system; it will not be effective at the operational distances that are there. We already have much better for those conditions.
    Against Israel and others there is no sense at all. The fact that there is more than enough.
    Wash it just PR.
    Yes, and I can’t imagine how to deploy at least one system there. This is a serious matter that I didn’t bring and arrange cars.

    Another thing is interesting. The review sector of this system is ~ 90 degrees. From memory, I can estimate that it is deployed in the direction of Lebanon-Israel. But this has not happened recently. What would that mean?
  45. mav1971
    mav1971 13 November 2015 18: 16
    +5
    The author of this note is a terrible minus for lying and juggling.
    You can’t lie like that.

    The note (allegedly as a fact from the British) says: "The statement is made that for the S-400 there is no such thing as stealth technology, and therefore the S-400" threatens "not only the F-15 and F-16, but also the F-22 Raptor. "

    The original article says: "Russian defense officials claim it can even target the fifth-generation F-22 Raptor aircraft." one hundred translates as: Russian military representatives declare that. that the F-22 is the target.

    From such a lie then fools appear, who then confidently tryndychat about that. that Americans fear C-400.
    They are not afraid of anything. The article is different.
    Think a little bit!

    About the author of this translation, very briefly, but succinctly, literally in two words, recently spoke out Lavrov ...
  46. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 13 November 2015 18: 28
    +1
    Quote: mav1971
    About the author of this translation, very briefly, but succinctly, literally in two words, recently spoke out Lavrov ...

    Well, I'm a picture ...))))) bully With these bastards the only way you need ....!
  47. Abrekkos
    Abrekkos 13 November 2015 18: 33
    0
    Quote: Stiletto
    But in vain Konashenkov began to disappoint them. Let them sit and shake with fear. Moreover, I would also hint that there are S-500s there. In stealth version. From the series "Do you see a gopher? No? And he is!"


    It certainly is. It is good to.
    But unfortunately, if we start deploying the system, after a few minutes all potential opponents already know that we have it there. They do not need pictures for this.
  48. vitaliy.rnd
    vitaliy.rnd 13 November 2015 18: 49
    0
    I understand that the British media and British scientists derive from one test tube ... The only difference is in the name.
  49. KnightRider
    KnightRider 13 November 2015 18: 51
    +1
    It would be nice! Plus S-400 in Armenia and Abkhazia and Crimea ... Have you mentally imagined all the "circles"? soldier
    1. pogis
      pogis 15 November 2015 17: 09
      0
      On 1 of June, at the exit from Kerch, I saw C-400. After 10 days at the exit from Feodosia (120 km from Kerch) ...
  50. Balagan
    Balagan 13 November 2015 19: 01
    0
    Yes, let the little shavers catch fear. Pour a little water into our mill. The enemy must be defeated without entering into battle with him. Contact is already when diplomacy is lost.