Military Review

China will receive the S-400 Triumph SAM not earlier than 2017

44
Referring to a source in the field of military-technical cooperation with foreign partners, the information agency TASS reports that the first C-400 “Triumph” anti-aircraft missile systems will begin to flow to China no earlier than 2017 of the year. TASS cites statements from a person who is aware of the progress of the contract:


Delivery is planned no earlier than in a year, rather, even a half.


China will receive the S-400 Triumph SAM not earlier than 2017


Recall that the statement that Russia and China signed a contract for the supply of C-400 "Triumph" to Beijing, was made in the spring of this year. There was no exact information about the amount of the contract then, but in a number of sources information appeared about 3 billions of dollars that China is willing to pay for the supply of at least six C-400 divisions.

Interest in acquiring this kind of anti-aircraft missile systems expressed not only in China. It became aware of interest in acquiring the C-400 air defense system by India and Saudi Arabia. However, none of these countries have signed contracts yet.

C-400 "Triumph" - medium-range and long-range anti-aircraft missile system. Target detection range - to 480 km. Range boundary of range: from 400 km (maximum) to 2 km (minimum). The system is capable of working on destruction at the same time to 36 targets, suggesting 2 missiles at each.
Photos used:
www.otvaga2004.narod.ru
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sever.56
    sever.56 12 November 2015 13: 22
    +15
    Correctly. First we provide for ourselves. And there, you see, the S-500 will be delivered and delivered to units.
    1. just exp
      just exp 12 November 2015 13: 24
      +7
      and it was conceived, at first the basic minimum for us. they are practically satisfied, and with the introduction of two new plants the series will grow significantly and can already be exported to China, India and Algeria. these countries want the S-400
      1. engineer74
        engineer74 12 November 2015 13: 27
        +4
        SAM - does not happen much! wink
        IMHO
        1. just exp
          just exp 12 November 2015 13: 29
          +2
          when there is little population, it happens.
          SAM should be comprehensive, but without excess, the pleasure is still far from cheap.
          1. engineer74
            engineer74 12 November 2015 13: 33
            +2
            The number of air defense systems, IMHO, is determined by the number of enemy air attacks, and not by its population! hi
            1. just exp
              just exp 12 November 2015 14: 26
              +6
              Imagine Monaco against the United States, even if you put the entire population of Monaco in the calculations of the air defense system from anyway, it’s not enough, and if all the people leave for air defense, they will take over all the strikers.
              balance is such that it is necessary even in the oral cavity when it is acid-base.
              1. 44 World
                44 World 12 November 2015 15: 00
                +9
                The Saudis do not need to sell 400 at all, these "partners" are too suspicious
          2. Semen Semyonitch
            Semen Semyonitch 12 November 2015 14: 44
            +3
            Quote: just explo
            SAM should be comprehensive, but without excess

            Probably air defense after all? And in what place is it "redundant"?
            1. just exp
              just exp 12 November 2015 15: 59
              0
              yes, the air defense system, has been grasped, so far without excess, but as they wrote above that there are not many, I want to say what happens sometimes.
        2. EGOrkka
          EGOrkka 12 November 2015 14: 51
          +1
          engineer74
          SAM - does not happen much!



          ...... we now .. what ..and the nails of the air defense system .... will we score? We are not Ukrainians what u ... bite! laughing
    2. sherp2015
      sherp2015 12 November 2015 14: 23
      +3
      Quote: sever.56
      Correctly. First we provide for ourselves.


      Kitaezam, I would not trust that ... This locust on foot, with bows and arrows, will overtake the globe in a year
      1. RussiaSILA
        RussiaSILA 12 November 2015 14: 31
        0
        This suggests that we will soon see a new air defense system, which is very pleasing !!!!!))) good
    3. Juborg
      Juborg 12 November 2015 14: 34
      0
      That's right, everything for sale, weapons, airplanes, land, women, children - what else can you sell !? Only then do sellers find themselves most often in the USA, all in white and with huge grandmothers. For example, the deceased Lesin (adviser to the president and the cabinet!), The former prime minister of the Russian Federation Kastyanov, there are many of them, these are simply the most iconic and high, but smaller, probably starting with Berizovsky’s names you can write a thick notebook. HOW WOULD WHAT WE SELL, AGAINST US, DO NOT TURN OVER !!!
  2. just exp
    just exp 12 November 2015 13: 22
    +2
    only after our contracts are fulfilled, and then only with the water of two new plants, should they start the series this year.
  3. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 12 November 2015 13: 22
    0
    I applaud standing, bravo ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 12 November 2015 13: 23
    +1
    "The complex is capable of simultaneously destroying 36 targets, aiming 2 missiles at each of them."

    This is where they are going to take so many missiles?
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 12 November 2015 13: 27
      0
      Most likely it was meant: To detect and track 36 targets, choose the most dangerous and 100% hit, well, and then as in a detective story: one in the heart, the second - control in the head))
      1. Ze Kot
        Ze Kot 12 November 2015 14: 19
        0
        Quote: Corsair0304
        Most likely it was meant: To detect and track 36 targets, choose the most dangerous and 100% hit, well, and then as in a detective story: one in the heart, the second - control in the head))



        So 2 missiles do not give 100% probability wink Something scribblers confused in the text.
  5. engineer74
    engineer74 12 November 2015 13: 24
    +1
    When, there, will the S-500 "ripen"? And not before! good
  6. oldseaman1957
    oldseaman1957 12 November 2015 13: 24
    +3
    I hope our people know what they are doing. And then the bros again sobesyaynichayutsya and will begin to rivet the S-400 like pies for sale on a deshman.
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 12 November 2015 13: 28
      +1
      It has been discussed more than once. It is unlikely that the Chinese will be able to copy and reproduce everything. And it’s expensive, it’s easier to buy in Russia.
    2. just exp
      just exp 12 November 2015 13: 30
      +2
      Why did they not rivet very much HQ9, although they even tried to supply it for export (they won the Turkish tender, only who from the USA will allow the Turks to choose a non-Western one).
      1. chunga-changa
        chunga-changa 12 November 2015 14: 19
        +1
        It seems that the Turks had serious problems with the breakdown of the radar complex, I don’t know how it ended.
        1. just exp
          just exp 12 November 2015 14: 27
          0
          how could they break at the Turks if the states did not allow the Turks to conclude a supply contract?
    3. PQ-18
      PQ-18 12 November 2015 13: 34
      0
      I hope our people know what they are doing. And then the bros again sobesyaynichayutsya and will begin to rivet the S-400 like pies for sale on a deshman.

      it does not even cause any doubts that the Chinese industrial Xerox will immediately be launched in all its might to build the S-400 at a dumping price!
      1. Taranchello
        Taranchello 12 November 2015 13: 59
        +4
        1. Not a single Chinese copy of anything ever matched the original TTX. TTX copies are much lower.
        2. All exported military products come with seriously truncated performance characteristics, compared with equipment for the RF Armed Forces.
        3. On the approach of the S-500, in 2017, I think, they will already begin to test.
        So why can’t you take 3 lard from the Chinese for the development of the S-600 and much more interesting things that we don’t even know ???
        1. Lenivets
          Lenivets 12 November 2015 22: 04
          +1
          I agree with you, except for the 3rd point (still not very soon) and the S-600. hi
          1. Taranchello
            Taranchello 13 November 2015 14: 35
            0
            Last year, they said that they would begin testing the S-500 in 2016, so as not to be unfounded:
            http://www.arms-expo.ru/news/armed_forces/zrs_s_500_nachnut_postupat_v_voyska_v_
            2016 /
            Understanding that the deadlines can be set by 2017, but not the point, even if they bring to mind in 2018, the main thing is that it has already been designed and developed.
            I cited the S-600 as an example, bearing in mind promising developments, and any, not only air defense ...
            1. Lenivets
              Lenivets 13 November 2015 22: 56
              0
              "Realizing that the deadlines can be shifted, set 2017"

              In order not to be disappointed then, add a 4-5 year old (and possibly) to the point. hi

              And once again I clarify: the S-500 is not a competitor to the S-400 and will not replace it, they have different tasks.
  7. Diviz
    Diviz 12 November 2015 13: 26
    0
    China needs a lot of such air defense.
  8. roskot
    roskot 12 November 2015 13: 42
    +1
    The main thing is not to forget about yourself.
  9. 3axap82
    3axap82 12 November 2015 13: 43
    0
    The concept of the US Air Force Instant Global Strike envisages launching a total of 4,5 Tomahawk missiles in non-nuclear weapons from different directions, within 20-60 minutes.
    Therefore, we need 1125 S-300 or 400 vehicles on constant combat duty. If we take standard ones based on a tractor with 4 launchers.
    Correct if I'm wrong or something I do not understand.
    There is of course Buk Tor Shell, but they are front-line and their radius of action is much smaller, therefore, to cover the airspace of Russia they will be required many times more.
    All that I wrote. WHY DO YOU SELL WHEN YOU DO NOT ENOUGH YOURSELF?
    1. Chertkov Oleg
      Chertkov Oleg 12 November 2015 14: 08
      +2
      The concept of the US Air Force Instant Global Strike envisages launching a total of 4,5 Tomahawk missiles in non-nuclear weapons from different directions, within 20-60 minutes.

      Amer fairy tales, they do not have such a "standard", so many missiles, and just a desire to stay with the "strait" instead of the country.
      1. 3axap82
        3axap82 12 November 2015 18: 46
        0
        The United States has all this, but it is stopped by the Voevoda retaliatory missiles and the fact that no one needs the attack.
        We pump oil and other minerals, sell titanium and rocket engines. We take US dollars for this and leave them in American banks.
        I may tell you a secret, but the United States has a gigantic number of not only missiles, they have 10 aircraft carrier groups. And ships-launchers and each ship has 400 Tomahawks. They created all this junk because their industrial potential is huge and has never been destroyed. I admit that you are an honest patriot, but you can't be in pink glasses on the eve of war.
    2. Karlovar
      Karlovar 12 November 2015 14: 48
      +4
      If 4,5 axes fly, then vigorous loaves will fly towards them .... Do they need it ???
      1. 3axap82
        3axap82 12 November 2015 18: 39
        -3
        This will be the end of North America. Then they will move to broken but not infected Eurasia.
        By your logic, nothing is needed at all except for missiles with nuclear warheads. Yes, not heavy mine, but any slag like Poplar.
        1. 3axap82
          3axap82 15 November 2015 15: 59
          0
          Poplar slag since it is not suitable as a retaliatory strike weapon, only as a first strike weapon. For this reason, Poplar cannot be considered a means of a guaranteed US response. We have no missile bases near the United States (for example, in Cuba or Venezuela), but the United States has such bases near the borders with Russia. And the flight time there will be not 20 minutes, but 5 minutes. In the long run, we won’t even have time to react. Satan is guaranteed to take off even from the epicenter of a nuclear explosion. Where is no Amer. ABOUT it will NEVER be able to detect because the electronics do not work there and the means of visual and satellite surveillance, too.
          Of course, war is unlikely to be. But it’s worth it to adequately prepare for it.
          We need S-400 in large quantities, primarily in Russia. And while there will be no saturation of troops, no sales abroad.
  10. bad
    bad 12 November 2015 13: 58
    +1
    Interest in acquiring this kind of anti-aircraft missile systems expressed not only in China. It became aware of interest in acquiring the C-400 air defense system by India and Saudi Arabia. However, none of these countries have signed contracts yet.
    ... because the buyers are careful that they know little ... if only they would shoot down a couple of "unfriendly" F-400s with the help of the s-22, or at worst F-16s, for example, somewhere in Syria laughing ..buyers would queue to bite each other..with marketing and advertising, we don’t have a fountain yet .. everything is old-fashioned, sorry for the money ... though..good in obsessive advertising and probably doesn’t need .. what
    1. antiexpert
      antiexpert 12 November 2015 18: 43
      -1
      what is called "Chelyabinsk Meteorite" was shot down, apparently, it was the S-400, tk. its speed acc. The performance characteristics of this air defense system, and who needs to know about it, therefore, unnecessary advertising is not needed - this is not a Bentley or a Mercedes)))
      1. 3axap82
        3axap82 12 November 2015 19: 04
        +1
        Do you even understand how the warhead of the S-400 complex rocket is launched? There is no bomb that can destroy a meteorite. There is a high-explosive fragmentation that detonates not crashing into the aircraft, but approaching it to the effective range of destruction by fragments.
        http://www.xliby.ru/transport_i_aviacija/tehnika_i_vooruzhenie_2001_03/p6.php
        Here are materials from the Soviet military encyclopedia.
  11. afrikanez
    afrikanez 12 November 2015 13: 58
    0
    Well, if they intend to deliver the S2017 to China by 400, then it follows that the C500 will be completely ready for operation. good
  12. yan 2015
    yan 2015 12 November 2015 14: 55
    +2
    arming the enemy of OUR enemy. we create one more theater and a headache for our enemy.
  13. F.Vastag
    F.Vastag 12 November 2015 14: 56
    0
    Saudis (from Arabia) - not to supply ANYTHING (not for any grandmas), the Americans will supply them with their Hre. "Patriots" and so on. And the supplies to China and India should be linked to the fact that IT (the supply of S-400 air defense systems to them) should all together with the Russian air defense form a UNIFIED ABM defense system in the Asian region CHINA-INDIA-RUSSIA - A single air defense (Closing the Sky of three countries in Asia ), only then there will be a sense from this. Yes, since China has long-standing ties with Pakistan (as opposed to India), and India has trade and close ties with Japan (as opposed to China) - Warn Them that Transfer of any data on the S-400 to Pakistan and Japan (Main Satellites and The lackeys of Washington (USA, NATO) in the Region are fraught with a threat to the security of not only Russia, but also China and India themselves (since Islamabad and Tokyo have always worked and are working in close connection with the States - for the Pentagon (USA). That is, neither about what cloning (from the Chinese) S-400 - in order to then Sell the Chinese clones of the S-400 to Pakistan - CANNOT BE SPEAKED about (since this will directly concern the Security of the People's Republic of China itself - and its vulnerability to the United States). concerns military contacts between India and Japan (the Hindus should not let the Japanese come close to our complexes - because this is fraught in the future for the security of India itself.) You can also supply (on a gratuitous basis) part of the S-400 complexes to North Korea (completely closing the sky abovePyongyang - from the Air Force and missiles of the United States, Japan and South Korea) and then our entire (and neighboring countries, friendly to us) Far Eastern and Asian sectors will be completely covered by our air defense systems.
    1. 44 World
      44 World 12 November 2015 21: 48
      0
      interesting ... and if ours has some kind of toggle switch that disables all the capabilities of the 400 matches during the development of an emergency situation?
  14. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 12 November 2015 16: 25
    0
    Quote: Corsair0304
    It has been discussed more than once. It is unlikely that the Chinese will be able to copy and reproduce everything. And it’s expensive, it’s easier to buy in Russia.

    So far, everything except aircraft engines has been successful.
  15. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 12 November 2015 18: 24
    +2
    Unique complex. Power!
  16. Lenivets
    Lenivets 12 November 2015 21: 47
    +1
    "Delivery is planned not earlier than in a year, rather, even one and a half."

    Optimists !!! laughing
    Rather, even 2-3.
  17. antiexpert
    antiexpert 13 November 2015 15: 31
    -1
    Quote: 3axap82
    There is no bomb that can destroy a meteorite.
    Follow the text - it was said "what is called" Chelyabinsk meteorite "" - once again - "called in the media"
    What actually happened there is a separate issue, but the cloud of spilled amyl and heptyl strongly resembled)))
    1. 3axap82
      3axap82 15 November 2015 16: 02
      0
      The flash was too large for a warhead of any kind of rocket. Since the object itself was larger.
      PS I didn’t minus)