Admiral Nakhimov will be equipped with Fort-M 3М48 complex

In the matter of modernization of the air defense system on the cruiser "Admiral Nakhimov" there was clarity - the ship will receive the product 3М-48, that is, the ship C-300FM "Fort-M", the blog bmpd with reference to the site of procurement "Sevmash".


Admiral Nakhimov will be equipped with Fort-M 3М48 complex


Back in December, Sevmash signed a contract with NPO Almaz (then Almaz-Antey) for the supply of this complex.

“For the upgraded cruiser, two air defense missile systems will be manufactured - fore and aft, costing 2 533 and 2 520 mln. Rub. respectively. The first is scheduled to take place in 2 quarter 2017, the second - at the end of 2017 g, “- said the blogger.

It is worth noting, he writes, that “during the manufacture of the air defense missile system, launchers with loading devices, which, as previously reported, will be repaired and upgraded by the forces of JSC Obukhov State Plant, as well as products 3F-41М and 3Ф42М (probably , these are ground service kits for the ATS) and “consumables” - 48H6DMK, 48Н6К, 5В55РМ rockets.

Thus, during the modernization of the cruiser, both Fort complexes will be upgraded to the Fort-M level. At present, such an air defense missile system is available only in the “Peter the Great” in the form of a bow installation.

According to the author, the updated ZRK will use 48H6K missiles, as well as “ship versions of the C-400-48H6 DMK missile with a radar homing head and a range of up to 250 km.”
Photos used:
www.korabel.ru/Irina Akimova
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. just exp 12 November 2015 13: 08 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    it’s not news, and for a long time it’s not news, it would be better to write off what the difference is with just Fort and which modernization was carried out.
    1. severniy 12 November 2015 13: 20 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      damn, how sad the ship looks on the slipways sad and how handsome he looks on the water good !!!
      1. severniy 12 November 2015 13: 23 New
        • 13
        • 0
        +13
        something like this----
      2. Ze Kot 12 November 2015 13: 26 New
        • 24
        • 0
        +24
        Quote: severniy
        damn, how sad the ship looks on the slipways sad and how handsome he looks on the water good !!!



        And you undress any beautiful woman and rinse makeup wink In most cases, a very big difference smile
        1. Hairy Siberian 12 November 2015 13: 30 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: severniy
          damn, how sad the ship looks on the slipways and how handsome it looks on the water !!!

          Not dejected, but frightening, like the capitalist’s post-apocalypse nightmare.
          1. Throw 12 November 2015 17: 35 New
            • 12
            • 0
            +12
            And you undress any beautiful woman and rinse off wink cosmetics In most cases, sooo much difference smile

            That you just put it wrong on the slipway laughing
        2. guzik007 12 November 2015 13: 31 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          And you undress any beautiful woman and rinse off wink cosmetics. In most cases, there is a very big difference.

          Ayayay! no luck to you :)
          1. Karabanov 12 November 2015 15: 33 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            Quote: guzik007
            And you undress any beautiful woman and rinse off wink cosmetics. In most cases, there is a very big difference.
            Ayayay! no luck to you :)

            No, he’s right in some ways ... once my wife sent me to her friend to pick something up. I know her friend well, outwardly a very beautiful girl, all of myself, just a sweetie ... I come this way - an unknown woman in a dressing gown opens to me, without any expressed female signs, there are no eyebrows, her lips are faded, her eyes are colorless. I was confused, I say - Can Olga be? She told me - why didn’t you know? I'm in shock ...
            I came home, I tell my wife - she has no face! Absolutely! I understood something ...
          2. askort154 12 November 2015 15: 54 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            guzik007 .... And you undress any beautiful woman and wash off wink cosmetics In most cases, the difference is sooooo big.

            Ayayay! no luck to you :)

            Of course, no luck. Why is tormented by washing. It is enough to see when it climbs out of the pastel in the morning. This is real beauty.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. just exp 12 November 2015 13: 33 New
          • 23
          • 0
          +23
          I'm bastard from Kate Beckinsale, I agree to disappointment, just let me undress her myself.
          1. VseDoFeNi 12 November 2015 13: 43 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: just EXPL
            just let me undress her myself.

            Hold her while undressing so she doesn't kick laughing
            1. Baikal 12 November 2015 14: 09 New
              • 18
              • 0
              +18
              Gentlemen, focus. So boobs communism and polamali crying
              1. just exp 12 November 2015 14: 23 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                and if there is no sex, then we will die out altogether.
                1. Throw 12 November 2015 17: 41 New
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  +5
                  Indeed, comrades, we will focus on science
            2. Ze Kot 12 November 2015 14: 20 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: VseDoFeNi
              Quote: just EXPL
              just let me undress her myself.

              Hold her while undressing so she doesn't kick laughing



              But this is already "by prior agreement, as part of a group of persons" ... wink
              1. VseDoFeNi 12 November 2015 17: 52 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: The Cat
                But this is already "by prior agreement, as part of a group of persons" ... wink

                - Help, rape!
                - Do not shout, you fool, I can handle it myself!

                I don’t know how about Beckinsale ...
                1. Throw 12 November 2015 20: 58 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  What homosexual pictures of girls otminusila?! .. am
                  1. VALERIK_097 13 November 2015 16: 56 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    This is not the magazine "Maxim", something to put the pros to women.
                    With orientation, everything is fine with me, but in this light, you look preoccupied.
                    1. Throw 14 November 2015 02: 30 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      This is a forum, not staff correspondence, so an easy male offtopic is only positive.

                      And we, comrade, unlike those who are preoccupied, do not have time to sit on some sort of "maxim" ...

                      Anyway, who called the magazine a machine gun ?!
            3. just exp 12 November 2015 14: 23 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              no, well, if you only hold it, no more, otherwise I'm kind of jealous.
            4. Oleg14774 12 November 2015 22: 41 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: VseDoFeNi
              Hold her while undressing so she doesn't kick

              Guys, actually an article about a warship! :) I’m embarrassed to ask, what does it have to do with it? Rather, this one!
              1. VseDoFeNi 13 November 2015 12: 04 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Oleg147741
                Guys, actually an article about a warship! :) I’m embarrassed to ask, what does it have to do with it? Rather, this one!

                Captain, REMEMBER - a woman on a ship unfortunately. laughing
          2. veksha50 12 November 2015 15: 12 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: just EXPL
            I agree to disappointment, just let me undress her myself.



            Imagine that she is like a cruiser on the water, new, beautiful, but powerful, aggressive and cruel ...

            You undress her, and she keeek kills ...

            PS This is to say that if during the repair-modernization of the cruiser hard workers talk about women, then they will put him into the water in the year 202 ... ohm ...
        5. podgornovea 12 November 2015 20: 39 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And I told you - you don’t need to be painted, your natural beauty is two orders of magnitude higher than that of 99 percent, even on 2 plastered layers. Although the plaster is also ambush - the first time I saw a clip by Dan International, the song I am Free, the woman thought. So you get into Geyropa in the sense of stepping into G ..., that is, you climb into ..ope, and whoever knows what morning there, Ukrainians will soon tell us, they will soon enter into the plan;))).
      3. Gomunkul 12 November 2015 13: 55 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        damn how sad the ship
        sailors have no ships, there are ships, do not offend the sailors. wink yes
        1. marlin1203 12 November 2015 14: 47 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Navy men are full of auxiliary fleet vessels, "if cho" soldier
        2. ssergn 12 November 2015 16: 25 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Well, yes, and the ship is the essence of what? A ship with weapons and under the flag of the navy. Something like this. He is also a steamer.
      4. severyanin 12 November 2015 23: 42 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: severniy
        damn, how sad the ship looks on the slipways

        Well, mine, again “naval commanders” show couch literacy :) “Ship” is a civilian vessel, and the heavy nuclear missile cruiser in 27 of thousands tons of displacement is not a vessel! In the Navy there is no such term!
    2. NEXUS 12 November 2015 13: 44 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: just EXPL
      it’s not news, and for a long time it’s not news, it would be better to write off what the difference is with just Fort and which modernization was carried out.

      But why talk specifically and everything ... the adversary is so spoiled that he put it on the classic intelligence with a parting, fetching the Old from the Internet stupidly ... They will know less, the “surprise” will be more fun at the exit ... sort of like -WELL WHAT B ..DI DO NOT WAIT! angry
    3. podgornovea 12 November 2015 20: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The difference between Fort and Fort M Look in the internet for everything there is if you dig around for fun. My daughter 4 of the year says, "Dad needs to try, but it won’t work out." Did you try hard?
  2. Vladimyrych 12 November 2015 13: 08 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    "Poliment Redoubt", "Poliment Redoubt" they shouted ... smile
    One hope is that they will abandon the oak drums and make human UVP.
    1. KGB WATCH YOU 12 November 2015 13: 22 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The drums will be. Miserable.
    2. chunga-changa 12 November 2015 14: 16 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The only question is money and timing. Repair of equipment is in every way cheaper and much faster than dismantling-manufacturing-installation, plus large-scale changes in the design of the ship. Those who dreamed of a polymer-redoubt, this was indicated before the start of modernization.
      1. little man 12 November 2015 22: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Well then, an integrated supply ship would be made of it. He wouldn’t have a price with such displacement and autonomy. And so he is a clay colossus.
      2. mav1971 12 November 2015 22: 58 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: chunga-changa
        The only question is money and timing. Repair of equipment is in every way cheaper and much faster than dismantling-manufacturing-installation, plus large-scale changes in the design of the ship. Those who dreamed of a polymer-redoubt, this was indicated before the start of modernization.


        Money and timeline.
        5 billion rubles for average air defense. 5 BILLION !!!
        To create an air defense ship level 30 summer ago.
        The final repair seems to cost 100 billion.
        This is the value of the latest Burke. With a relatively similar firepower.
        With the existing housing, power plant, etc.
        Something in this conservatory went wrong.
        Our salaries are 10 times less. and the cost of our weapons has already surpassed the mattress.

        just right to shout either about the cut, or about the demand for executions ...
  3. yan 2015
    yan 2015 12 November 2015 13: 18 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    it is necessary to reanimate the entire naval platoon that we have in reserve and in sludge. put them on track and start restoring the entire shipbuilding industry. so close to the smell of war near the borders of Russia since the Caribbean crisis.
    1. huntsman650 12 November 2015 14: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Engines where to get, when ours will be, not earlier than the 17th year.
      1. VALERIK_097 12 November 2015 17: 53 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Which engines - read the comments above, this is a steamboat (with 2 echelons)
    2. Kibalchish 12 November 2015 16: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      it is necessary to reanimate the entire naval platoon that we have in reserve and in sludge. put them on track and start restoring the entire shipbuilding industry. so close to the smell of war near the borders of Russia since the Caribbean crisis.


      I agree with you. But, the only difference is that then we had something to answer.
  4. Garris199 12 November 2015 13: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    We decided to take the path of least resistance and reduce the cost of modernization as much as possible. In the current situation, this is probably right.
    1. Nikolay K 12 November 2015 18: 55 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      More than 5 billions of rubles just for the c-300 system, wow cheapening. Of course, I understand that for many years the defense industry has been greatly underfunded, but now that key products have been put on stream, we need to tidy up pricing. Otherwise, a few volleys of calibers and C-300 and the country will be left without pants.
  5. ia-ai00 12 November 2015 13: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    ... The first is planned to be commissioned in the 2nd quarter of 2017, the second - at the end of 2017 "...

    Well, what can I say, Dill, again, "wiped" the nose of Russia, - ALREADY, "replenishing
    Ukrainian Navy with two armored boats " laughing
  6. bad
    bad 12 November 2015 13: 30 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Even in such an unpresentable form, this ship is BEAUTIFUL! I really want to live to see it put into operation .. power! fellow
  7. roskot 12 November 2015 13: 34 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Will also serve Russia. With such names, ships do not give up.
  8. exalex2 12 November 2015 13: 47 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    So many times to "bury". Unsinkable ..
  9. v1tz 12 November 2015 13: 47 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    They launched the ship, now the dough is in the repair and the upgrade will invest a lot, but it's worth it, this can only make it look like it can reduce the heat ...
  10. Taranchello 12 November 2015 13: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The good news is that they zealously took up the modernization of Nakhimov, and this is a balm for the soul !!! Give Nakhimov to the fleet in 2017 !!! Hurray, comrades !!!
  11. Fess_blaga 12 November 2015 14: 02 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Hmm ...

    As already written, Reduta will not. Polement, as I understand it, too.
    And, 100%, there will remain two rotary AP complex FORT, which in the 21st century is generally sad.
  12. atk44849 12 November 2015 14: 22 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    I myself am naval. just think. repair of the main engine costs three million! so new but with conservation costs a million. installation another million. okay so ... but, - admitted the director of the type of a military plant of our ship repair! _ chiefs of 20 people! workers! - Three! the collapse of vocational schools! - the collapse of ship repair. and you talk about military acceptance. I do not believe !!!!. where to get hands lads! - I answer the repair crews - this is a sharash-installation!
    it's in Vladivostok! you are real!, think it over! well, there’s nobody to work! no welders-hulls, no diesel engineers! the last will leave forty and EVERYTHING!
    1. viktorrymar 12 November 2015 14: 54 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      it's in Vladivostok! you are real!, think it over! well, there’s nobody to work! no welders-hulls, no diesel engineers! the last will leave forty and EVERYTHING!


      Chef !!! The mustache is gone, chef !!!

      1. Poppy 12 November 2015 16: 21 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        graduated polymer
    2. maiman61 12 November 2015 16: 54 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Stop singing songs! If the hard workers have hours for 30 lyamas like Pushkov, then the hard workers will have a sea! And for the balance there are no fools to work!
      1. Garris199 12 November 2015 18: 39 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: maiman61
        And for the balance there are no fools to work!

        And it would seem. Serious contracts, expensive equipment. Where's the money? For a good salary of the same worker Sevmash should be 100+ thousand rubles. It’s not even riveting iPhones, the highest qualifications are needed. All this is strange. It seems like we have a market, but it turns out that not everywhere.
    3. VALERIK_097 12 November 2015 18: 18 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Well, you don’t speak for everyone, and garbage about military acceptance, too.
      Well, since you put in the naval piston, turn the mechanisms, at least manually, less hemorrhoids during the repair.
      I have already broken a lot with watch phones (toys prevailed), no complaints have been received yet.
      And the fact that many craftsmen and workers are now working in the factories of Dvinsk and Skolzky Peninsula do not deny. Labor migration however.
      The good news: on one of the cats today physical start)))
  13. veksha50 12 November 2015 15: 07 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "The first is planned to be commissioned in the 2nd quarter of 2017, the second - at the end of 2017" ...

    Oh, how long is that ...

    Indeed, the truth is, the problem is most likely not only in production capacities, but also in the lack of qualified personnel ... If there were people - organize work in three shifts, and control, control the passage of each point in the technological chain ...
    1. VALERIK_097 12 November 2015 18: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: veksha50
      Would there be people - organize work in three shifts, and control, control the passage of each point in the technological chain ...

      I’ll explain about control - ZhOKov (Operational Control Journal) has not been canceled. And if you plow in three shifts, then people give up after 2 weeks, even with rotation (hence errors, n / s, etc.). I say how foreman of one of the best teams in my enterprise.
    2. Lenivets 12 November 2015 21: 43 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      "most likely, not only in production capacities, but also in the lack of qualified personnel"

      In "Diamond" there are enough people.
      There is another difficulty - the restoration of production of the S-300F, and this is money and time (it was long removed from production).
  14. I am Russian 12 November 2015 18: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1573597.html
    1. The comment was deleted.
  15. Zomanus 12 November 2015 23: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well this is air defense with drum launchers.
    And the KR will fly from vertical launchers.
    And the Kyrgyz Republic is the main weapon, the working tool of this ship.
    We’ll also see what peepers will establish which detection stations.
    In any case, one such ship will not go anywhere.
    And as a cover you can put an air defense / missile ship,
    Stuck with modules. Calm.
    1. severyanin 13 November 2015 00: 15 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Zomanus
      And as a cover you can put an air defense / missile ship,
      Stuck with modules. Calm.

      I will answer you with a quote from the cat Matroskin from the cartoon: "Before you sell something unnecessary, you must first buy something unnecessary" - this is to say that before you put the air defense / missile ship, you must first have such an air defense ship in the fleet / PRO ... Maybe you’ll call us like that ... at least one ??? not? I thought so:)
  16. Onil 13 November 2015 00: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What else is Fort M? Back in the late 80s, it was created to replace the Rif air defense system with a 48N6E missile (NATO SAN-12). Where did it go?
    1. xtur 13 November 2015 01: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      > Back in the late 80s was created to replace the air defense system Reef

      like this is the name of the export version