"Krasuha-4" covers the Russian airbase in Syria from intelligence satellites and radar E-8 JSTARS

106
In October, many publications reported that the Krasukha-4 multifunctional interference module was deployed on Hamish’s base in Syria. What are the possibilities of this complex? The correspondent tried to answer this question. Messenger of Mordovia Denis Peredrienko, who last month visited the Day of Innovation of the Central Military District. The military shared some information with the journalist.

"Krasuha-4" covers the Russian airbase in Syria from intelligence satellites and radar E-8 JSTARS


“Product 1RL257 is intended for covering ground and air objects from aerial and space reconnaissance, aimed strikes aviation enemy by electronic suppression of airborne radars.





Limits of operation: in azimuth 360 degrees and in elevation - from -1 to + 85 degrees.





“Krasuha-4” has the following throughput: 1 radar of the spacecraft and 1 aircraft of the combat control and targeting system of the E-8 JSTARS or 11 radar of tactical aircraft.





The radius of the cover zone during the suppression of the radar of tactical aircraft strike aircraft is 11-19 km, reconnaissance and attack systems-16-41 km, and spacecraft-15-25 km. Deployment time is up to 20 minutes.





“Krasuha-4” is mounted on the chassis of four-axle KAMAZ 63501 all-terrain vehicles. ”
  • http://vestnik-rm.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +52
      12 November 2015 12: 13
      back in early October, in the Zvezda TV report on the video showing the moment of the return of the Russian Su-25 attack aircraft from the combat mission to the Khmeimim airfield, the complex based on the KAMAZ car with a characteristic set of antennas is clearly visible in the background
      1. Tor5
        +15
        12 November 2015 12: 45
        Good deal! So let them now search all over the desert!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +11
        13 November 2015 00: 30
        So this is what you are, Russian "CHEBURASHKA" belay (see photo)

        This is what the Kakhla squealed ...
        1. 0
          14 November 2015 14: 42
          Cheburashka, then they called the flamethrower "Buratino".
    2. +52
      12 November 2015 12: 19
      This is, apparently, what NATO Supreme Commander General Philip Breedlove called a "bubble" that prevents NATO "litacs" from flying ...
      1. +14
        12 November 2015 12: 45
        for sure, this is the famous Russian bubble for which NATO members cannot peep
        1. +26
          12 November 2015 13: 00
          Well, isn't it "Krasukha"? .. bully
          1. +8
            13 November 2015 05: 18
            "Krasuha" is beautiful laughing
        2. +11
          12 November 2015 13: 14
          it’s still there ..., the general was crying about the 600 km zone. diameter fellow ...
          Blinded by radar, disrupted the electronic guidance systems, as well as set a hindrance satellite imagery in the "bubble" in diameter 600 km, according to one of NATO generals in the publication Daily OSNet.

          or is it "fear has big eyes" belay ??? ....
          1. +8
            12 November 2015 14: 16
            Could it be like with a caliber? These specifications may be kept secret.
            1. +2
              13 November 2015 20: 01
              Quote: Y34Gagarin
              Could it be like with a caliber? These specifications may be kept secret.

              They are in secret ... but the fact that Krasukha-4 is able to blind and drown AWACS already says a lot. As for the UAV, it is like a "light breakfast" to her.
              Somewhere infa caught my eye that there is already an experienced prototype of Krasukha-5 ...
        3. +1
          13 November 2015 21: 19
          It does not block the optics, nor does Mezhdoptik. The role of ANN in SU is growing, but ... Then another device enters the scene ... Probably it's Tetris laughing
      2. +5
        12 November 2015 13: 25
        These "letaki" are afraid of the mere presence of the Russian Aerospace Forces on the territory of Syria ... A good reason not to get into their "super-cool" F-16 ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. -99
          12 November 2015 13: 48
          Quote: Prapor-527
          These "letaki" are afraid of the mere presence of the Russian Aerospace Forces on the territory of Syria ... A good reason not to get into their "super-cool" F-16 ...

          Oh, how they are afraid then ... It is a pity that the Israeli pilots who racked up Damascus airport yesterday morning do not know about the "600 km bubble", I must tell them, let them be afraid too ...
          1. +28
            12 November 2015 14: 17
            Clap your hands ... Your favorite resource "censor.net" has not confirmed the information.
          2. +29
            12 November 2015 14: 28
            Which airport did the Jews take yesterday? I have not heard. belay Link, pliz.
            1. +30
              12 November 2015 14: 31
              Jews, too, do not know. Only on the censor squealed on this topic.
              1. -3
                12 November 2015 22: 16
                Quote: Banshee
                Jews, too, do not know. Only on the censor squealed on this topic.

                Hey . Novel
                Yesterday already infa passed.
                Hezbollah’s weapons depots were bombed at Damascus Airport.
                1. 0
                  14 November 2015 03: 03
                  Provocateur.
              2. 0
                12 November 2015 22: 53
                Roman, doesn’t Israel cooperate with us?
                1. +4
                  13 November 2015 01: 17
                  so without an agreement they wouldn’t have snooped in, Israel immediately declared that it would not allow the armament of the militants of hezboloid.
                2. +1
                  14 November 2015 03: 04
                  No, Israel is collaborating with itself and with its undertaker.
            2. -2
              12 November 2015 22: 06
              Quote: mitrich
              Which airport did the Jews take yesterday? I have not heard. belay Link, pliz.




              what
              The fact of airstrike took place to be, but who exactly - is still in question.
              Jerusalem "refuses to comment," which is usually a sign that it is them.

              http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/11/report-israel-strikes-t
              arget-in-syria / 415446 /
            3. The comment was deleted.
          3. +3
            12 November 2015 17: 45
            Quote: Mera Joota
            Damascus Airport

            Do you have a "mask" on your face or brain?
            1. -2
              12 November 2015 19: 01
              I don’t know ours or not, but someone has built up a warehouse with weapons of Hezbollah or a convoy with weapons near a damask airport. A farce (Iranian) agency reports the Lebanese media, I read on the news.
              1. +3
                13 November 2015 12: 33
                It's you about that raid that was in December 2014, I think so, because I don’t know about other Google. Ukrainians carry it now. The rest is almost a year ago.
              2. +1
                13 November 2015 20: 17
                Jacob Kedmi: Attack on Damascus Airport was agreed with Russia
                http://warfiles.ru/show-100001-yakov-kedmi-ataka-na-aeroport-damaska-byla-soglas
                ovana-s-russia.html
          4. +2
            12 November 2015 21: 37
            proof in studio
            1. -7
              12 November 2015 21: 59
              Go to newsru.co.il
            2. -13
              12 November 2015 22: 20
              Quote: Etric
              proof in studio

              please
              The aim of the air strikes, according to foreign media reports, inflicted by the Israeli Air Force near Damascus airport in Syria, were weapons depots for Hezbollah.

              At the same time, according to the report of the Syrian information portal "Damascus Alan", heavy damage was caused to all army outposts around the airport, but there were no casualties among the people.
              At the same time, the Syrian opposition activist Ahmed Yabrudi wrote that "Israeli warplanes entered the airspace of southern Lebanon, turned to the al-Kalamoun pass (on the Lebanese-Syrian border) and passed over the international airport in Damascus, where they struck near military outposts. ". He also noted that these outposts belonged to Hezbollah.
              1. +1
                14 November 2015 03: 14
                Yeah, Israel hit again, bypassing international law. Israel will be horseradish - I will be silent. They ran into themselves, there is nothing to fulfill the will of the black master.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. -2
              12 November 2015 22: 21
              Quote: Etric
              proof in the studio ...


              Watch from 4: 00

              1. +2
                12 November 2015 22: 51
                And whose channel is it broadcasting?
                1. 0
                  13 November 2015 03: 02
                  Quote: Sandov
                  And whose channel is it broadcasting?


                  Syrian.

                  Orient news (Previously known as Television al-Mashreq TV) is news TV channel owned by Ghassan Abboud, a Syrian businessman and journalist.


                  1. +1
                    14 November 2015 03: 16
                    Strange, the letter is Jewish, but Syria is broadcasting. Ahahha
                2. +3
                  13 November 2015 03: 23
                  No jester is clear, but judging by the selection, the channel is "moderate" and apparently private.
                  And if the Tsakhal really bombed, it’s not a matter of great disappointment (HZB stocks are not a pity, but it looks like a slap in the face of Russia)
                  1. -2
                    13 November 2015 11: 33
                    Quote: 3officer
                    ... but it looks like a slap in the face of Russia ...


                    And in what exactly?
                    Israel warned that it would not sacrifice its own security issues? - warned. Yes
                    Putin agreed on this issue with Netanyahu? - Agreed. Yes

                    All absolutely as agreed, Israel does not interfere with the Russian Aerospace Forces to achieve their goals, and Russia does not interfere with the Tsakhal Air Force to achieve its own (in its own "backyard"), on controversial issues they conduct a dialogue behind closed doors - this was the agreement. request
                    Food for thought: why the Kremlin suddenly recognized part of Assad’s enemies as legitimate negotiating partners, that part Israel’s suspected contacts. request

                    Py.Sy.
                    It is rather common sense slap on conceit of patriots.
                    Nefig was shouting - "we say, the coolest, the masters of the Syrian sky and all of us are afraid", then would not be now in the position of those caught in empty bragging. request
                    1. +3
                      14 November 2015 03: 19
                      Strange, Israel. The tension in the region is removed, you feel bad. So do not wait for concessions from ISIS. Ah, sorry, you are their bank, I'm sorry. Say hello to the black master and prepare the coffins for yourself, will rise in price soon. ISIS also wants to live.
              2. -3
                12 November 2015 22: 51
                Recruitment for a couple of months, probably even more
                1. -5
                  13 November 2015 03: 12
                  Quote: Absurdidat
                  Recruitment for a couple of months, probably even more


                  This is the Orient News newsletter dated 11.11.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX.

                  Language should follow the thought, and not vice versa.

                  I understand that you do not understand Belmes in Arabic, and this, in turn, makes your "strong opinion" about this video absolutely incompetent and petty.
                  1. +2
                    14 November 2015 03: 21
                    Ahmetka, is that your lady? Drop it, go to p ..... sys, they pay more there.
          5. 0
            13 November 2015 17: 07
            You minus - any "duck" should be checked before quacking on the site! wassat
          6. +1
            13 November 2015 18: 30
            What did you forget here with your filthy mouth ??)
          7. +1
            13 November 2015 23: 54
            What did you smoke the day before? You can not do it this way! And then Cheburashka with Kraukhov will come to visit ...
          8. 0
            14 November 2015 08: 17
            From rage and start to rave already started? Go to the doctor, it can be treated.
          9. 0
            15 November 2015 10: 35
            I don’t know where you got such data from, I heard that F16 fly only in Iraq
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. 0
        13 November 2015 07: 54
        NATO has a nightmare after a nightmare!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +18
    12 November 2015 12: 09
    It is better to call it -Krasava-4)))
    1. +6
      12 November 2015 12: 40
      Quote: Unique
      It is better to call it -Krasava-4)))

      I have already met several times that some "analyst experts" call it "KrasNukha". In honor of a childhood illness, or what?
      1. +8
        12 November 2015 12: 54
        Kraukha is in the common people belladonna or bilin. Everyone understands what bilina does with brains.
        1. +13
          12 November 2015 13: 54
          Quote: interceptor58
          Kraukha is in the common people belladonna or bilin.

          For residents of the Pskov region Krasuha is a village burned by the Germans, along with all the inhabitants in 1943. The same fate as the Belarusian Khatyn.

          1. +4
            12 November 2015 14: 29
            They burned the same trigger.
        2. +1
          12 November 2015 14: 28
          Grass is called belladonna.
        3. +2
          12 November 2015 22: 03
          from the fifth time I realized that you meant WHITE, but wrote "BILINA"!
      2. +4
        12 November 2015 12: 54
        KrasNuha at enemy pilots
      3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +29
    12 November 2015 12: 09
    The news in the topic, if so, then this one is just great:
    -The first batch of systems that allow you to turn the Russian Su-34 front-line bomber into an electronic warfare aircraft will be delivered to the Russian Armed Forces in November this year. This was announced by the first deputy general director of the Concern Radioelectronic Technologies Igor Nasenkov.
    “The first batch will be delivered in November this year,” RIA Novosti quoted Nasenkov as speaking at the Dubai Airshow-2015.
    According to him, the systems will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, including long-range radar aircraft.

    Original news RT in Russian:
    https://russian.rt.com/article/129387
    1. +10
      12 November 2015 12: 12
      .. ahead of seconds .. hi
    2. +2
      12 November 2015 12: 14
      According to him, the systems will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, including long-range radar aircraft.

      Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.
      1. -1
        12 November 2015 14: 30
        Quote: fiction
        Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.

        "KAMAZ" on the Su-24 is cool.
        1. +3
          12 November 2015 14: 51
          Quote: Koshak
          Quote: fiction
          Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.

          "KAMAZ" on the Su-24 is cool.

          Read koment first TSOOBER
          Quote: TSOOBER
          The news in the topic, if so, then this one is just great:
          -The first batch of systems that allow you to turn the Russian Su-34 front-line bomber into an electronic warfare aircraft will be delivered to the Russian Armed Forces in November this year. This was announced by the first deputy general director of the Concern Radioelectronic Technologies Igor Nasenkov.
          “The first batch will be delivered in November this year,” RIA Novosti quoted Nasenkov as speaking at the Dubai Airshow-2015.
          According to him, the systems will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, including long-range radar aircraft.

          Original news RT in Russian:
          https://russian.rt.com/article/129387

          and comets TSOOBER was my question
          Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.

          am fool wassat
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          13 November 2015 23: 08
          Read carefully!
      2. +1
        12 November 2015 14: 31
        Over Cook was Perinei, there are still Himalayas.
      3. +4
        12 November 2015 14: 32
        No, there was a quite prosaic "Khibina". However, it was enough.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +15
    12 November 2015 12: 10
    So on this occasion an American general was indignant like "a huge electronic bubble prevents us from flying and observing"
    Ches word, I am proud of our defense industry. The adversary will again have to switch from missiles to guns and stupid bombs.
    1. +11
      12 November 2015 12: 15
      Time for the adversary to go to the grave.
    2. +8
      12 November 2015 12: 23
      I agree about stupid bombs laughing
      as THEIR General recently stated, our EW capabilities do not reach even one tenth of the capabilities of EW Russia
      1. +3
        13 November 2015 21: 30
        Do not flatter yourself. They have plenty of technology.
        One bad thing: I spoke recently with a taxi driver - he was the former beginning of the lab. strength in a helicopter plant. Left to tax - ZP 2 times higher .... So it is at the aircraft factory. Orders seem to be there, but no RFP. Until this is reversed, there will be nothing super new and wonderful.

        PS It’s better to overestimate a possible adversary than to underestimate.
  7. +2
    12 November 2015 12: 10
    Indeed, the name of the device corresponds, Beauty in Russian - "Krasukha-4"
  8. +8
    12 November 2015 12: 10
    .. true path we go comrades .. in addition: ..
    DUBAI, Nov 12 - RIA Novosti. The first batch of special containers, allowing to turn the Russian front-line bomber Su-34 into an electronic warfare (EW) aircraft, will be delivered to the Russian Ministry of Defense in November this year, the first deputy general director of the Concern Radioelectronic Technologies (KRET, part of " Rostec ") Igor Nasenkov.
    "The first batch will be delivered in November this year," Nasenkov said at the 2015 Dubai Airshow.
    The wingtips of all Su-34s are equipped with a basic set of the Khibiny-10V multifunctional electronic warfare system.
    "The Ministry of Defense will receive the first batch of so-called stackable containers installed under the fuselage, which will turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft, which will be able to protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, long-range radar aircraft patrol and so on - that is, the protection of other aircraft of the group, "- said the agency's interlocutor.
    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20151112/1319117371.html#ixzz3rGZ9ZQAy

    .. hi
  9. +1
    12 November 2015 12: 10
    Murmansk-BN is all better. At 5000km everything cleans
  10. +2
    12 November 2015 12: 11
    Another would be to deploy a full-fledged air defense grouping so that the "partners" do not open their mouths to the land invasion of Syria ..
  11. +2
    12 November 2015 12: 11
    And rightly so. I think the NATO members are spying on our group in full.
  12. +20
    12 November 2015 12: 14
    In the mid-seventies he served in the RTV unit, where the ancestors of this magnificent weapon were in service. Then we looked through, and if necessary, could blind airplanes over the whole of Scandinavia, and to the west we got to Germany. Modern Russian electronic warfare equipment is simply fantastic in its capabilities!
    1. +1
      13 November 2015 03: 22
      Uncle, are you a Murmansk adit ?! Tooth is full of everything, already shining !!! wink
  13. bad
    +5
    12 November 2015 12: 15
    so that no one writes or speaks about our electronic warfare equipment, it is obvious that they are very effective .. no doubt .. and their characteristics for open access are clearly underestimated laughing adversary in a big bummer ... but we still don’t know much .. for those who are interested - Electronic War - TV Channel "Star"
    http://tvzvezda.ru/video/docfilms/content/201502261512-zave.htm/
  14. +3
    12 November 2015 12: 19
    NATO officials recently wrote about a "radar bubble" over Syria.

    Is this not due to "Krasuha"?
  15. +1
    12 November 2015 12: 22
    The main thing is not to slow down, but to snicker! In terms of developing further at a double pace, so that the Yankees will remain far behind :)
  16. +2
    12 November 2015 12: 28
    It looks intimidating ... especially the mast, with objects in a circle similar to flashlights.
  17. +2
    12 November 2015 12: 35
    NATO spies. But the bubble is in the way. The beauty is called.
  18. +10
    12 November 2015 12: 40
    Our learned heads, however, also with humor: "Rubella", "Solntsepek", "Buratino",
    Well, we wish our scientists good health, and create excellent weapons to protect our homeland.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. +5
    12 November 2015 12: 47
    Quote: feniks
    Our learned heads, however, are also humorous: "Rubella", "Solntsepek", "Buratin
    about"...

    KrasНear is a viral disease. It’s time to recall and read the title.
  20. +3
    12 November 2015 12: 47
    so here he is what you are a Syrian "electronic bubble" :)
  21. 0
    12 November 2015 12: 50
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    This is, apparently, what NATO Supreme Commander General Philip Breedlove called a "bubble" that prevents NATO "litacs" from flying ...


    It is on "Rubella-4" that the American military "complain", stating that a dome 600 kilometers in diameter, absolutely impenetrable for electronic reconnaissance, has formed over Latakia.
    1. +2
      12 November 2015 13: 02
      Quote: feniks
      It is on "Rubella-4" that the American military "complain", stating that a dome 600 kilometers in diameter, absolutely impenetrable for electronic reconnaissance, has formed over Latakia.

      The real radius does not bother? Or didn’t read to the digital?
    2. -5
      12 November 2015 13: 02
      Quote: feniks
      It is on "Rubella-4" that the American military "complain", stating that a dome 600 kilometers in diameter, absolutely impenetrable for electronic reconnaissance, has formed over Latakia.

      The real radius does not bother? Or didn’t read to the digital?
      1. +1
        12 November 2015 14: 37
        A radius of 17 km in one installation. You can put them as you like, and you won’t see the whole country.
        1. 0
          20 February 2018 16: 25
          The radius of the cover, not the radius of detection and suppression. A missile should not fly 17 km to a concealed target.
  22. +1
    12 November 2015 13: 12
    Quote: Mera Joota
    The real radius does not bother? Or didn’t read to the digital?


    Here is the link: http: //svpressa.ru/war21/article/135828/? Rss = 1
  23. +1
    12 November 2015 13: 21
    "Krasuha-4" covers the Russian airbase in Syria from intelligence satellites and radar E-8 JSTARS

    And how can it interfere with satellites?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      12 November 2015 13: 41
      Quote: stone
      And how can it interfere with satellites?

      This refers to reconnaissance radar satellites. In general, side-scan radars with synthesized aperture are interfered with.
      Optical reconnaissance satellites are highly dependent on weather conditions. A small cloud can close a large area for example ...
      1. +5
        12 November 2015 19: 17
        I will clarify. The last US satellite, capable of conducting optical reconnaissance, safely left orbit in 2008, giving way to "more advanced" electronic digital. Therefore, all satellite images of the United States since then are either European, or "completely classified", or Photoshop.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. -3
          13 November 2015 08: 42
          Quote: beer-youk
          The last US satellite, capable of conducting optical reconnaissance, safely left orbit in 2008, giving way to the "more advanced" electronic digital. Therefore, all satellite images of the United States since then are either European, or "completely classified", or Photoshop.

          Electron-optical means with a digital camera. Is this a discovery for you?
          1. +2
            13 November 2015 17: 49
            Quote: beer-youk
            The last US satellite capable of conducting optical reconnaissance safely left orbit in 2008, giving way to the "more advanced" electronic digital.
            Quote: Mera Joota
            Electron Optical Means

            The interference caused by electronic warfare is useless against a film camera)). Is this a discovery for you?
    3. 0
      20 February 2018 16: 26
      Radar when viewing the surface in the overview and detailed modes.
  24. +1
    12 November 2015 13: 22
    How does the inclusion of these funds affect the operation of our CEA on our technology?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      12 November 2015 13: 42
      Quote: RRiv
      How does the inclusion of these funds affect the operation of our CEA on our technology?

      Yes, in general, nothing. The station detects the operation of the side-view radar, determines the frequency and interferes with it.
  25. +15
    12 November 2015 13: 47
    Here is a real Cheburator!
    1. +4
      12 November 2015 13: 57
      Quote: Be proud.
      Here is a real Cheburator!

      Yes, the ears match.
      1. +4
        12 November 2015 14: 34
        The ears came from the "Cheburashka" - SPN-30. Excellent radiator antennas.
  26. +1
    12 November 2015 13: 57
    Quote: Author
    The radius of the cover zone when suppressing the radar of tactical aircraft attack aircraft - 11-19 km, reconnaissance and strike systems - 16-41 km, spacecraft - 15-25 km. Deployment time - up to 20 minutes.


    Like yes.


    The purpose of the station is covering stationary objects from airborne radar reconnaissance radars of the E-8C Dzhistars aircraft, multi-functional radar of strike aircraft, reconnaissance and reconnaissance-strike UAVs Global Haw and Predator, Radar AES "Lacrosse".

    It’s not very clear how this (satellite) can be accomplished by having
    Quote: Author
    Work limits: in azimuth of 360 degrees and in elevation - from -1 to +85 degrees.

    ?
    1. The orbital construction of the Lacrosse -3,4,5 system (USA-133, USA-152 and USA-182)
    and on-board equipment capabilities allow reconnaissance of Russian territory with two spacecraft with a range of 4000 km - more than 9 hours a day, with three spacecraft - more than 14 hours a day.

    Tk. elevation angle of 85g, there remains a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees.
    That at an altitude of Lokros' orbit of 700 km, will give a "hole" with an area of ​​a spherical segment of about 115 426 923,5 sq. Km
    115,5 million square kilometers of the sky will not be covered (if Lacros flies over the object).

    Lacrosse will be in this "hole": 3700 km: 7,9 km / s = 468,5 seconds = almost 8 minutes

    The Lacrosa radar alternately transmits and receives pulses at specific microwave wavelengths (in the range from 1 cm to 1 m, which corresponds in the frequency range from about 300 MHz to 30 GHz) and polarization (waves polarized in one vertical or horizontal plane).

    To obtain a radar image, about 1500 powerful pulses per second are transmitted to the target area or images, each pulse has a pulse width (pulse-width pulse) of typically 10-50 microseconds.
    Those. Image Satellite will receive





    1. -2
      12 November 2015 14: 03
      2. Even if we assume that not the ADS-10, but the ADS-30 are working on the REP
      ADS-30: Marine diesel power station ADS 30-T400 TP manufactured by VEPR, based on the original Perkins engine (Great Britain) (Rubella-4), Power 24,5 kW from the generator

      ADS10: Boar ADC 10 - Т400 РЯ - three-phase stationary diesel power station; , equipped with an engine of the brand Yanmar 3TNE78G1 / 3TNV82GGE, Power 10,0 kW with generator

      Jammers power will hardly exceed 4kW at the antenna output

      There are no clear data on Lacrosse, but probably SB, with a span of 45 m, and large batteries give up to 20 kW on the sunny side and 10 kW on the night.

      In terms of radiation power, they are almost parity.
      But "Rubella" needs to ensure the azimuthal speed (mechanically) of tracking the satellite: 0,06 deg / sec. Lacrosse-FAR, and the PCA mode

      Lacrosse-VEGA ONYX (L-5) -FAR with RSA


      The synthetic aperture method makes it possible to obtain a significant increase in spatial resolution due to the multiple acquisition of an image of one surface element from different viewing angles, in comparison with an ordinary radar.
      Antennas installed on satellites can also be used in a passive mode, receiving signals radiated from the earth or signals from other satellites (radar) reflected from the Earth.

      3.In addition to the radar, the Lacrosa have

      (Their rubella will not block)
      1. +6
        12 November 2015 14: 36
        Quote: opus
        (Their rubella will not block)

        How much can you? Not "rubbish", but "rubbish"
        1. 0
          12 November 2015 14: 52
          Quote: Koshak
          Not "rubbish", but "rubbish"

          Well, I'm sorry, this is written automatically by the hands.
          1. Rubella - highly infectious acute infectious disease.
          No error
          Krasukha taboo rubella, from red; see Brandt, RFV 22, 141.

          2. It is unlikely that the creators of 1RL257 had in mind
          Krauha = belladonna, whitefly, white companion, mad cherry, mad berry, bobovnik, snake grass, krasava, beauty, belladonna, krasena, krasheka, krasovitka, krasulya, plant, sleepy fool

          "Belladons = belladonna = krasukha tried, or ate wolfberry, so she introduced herself"

          "Maybe she didn’t dress for the weather, so" krasuha "ruined her"

          Krasukha, a village in the Pskov region, destroyed by the Nazis during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–45
      2. +3
        12 November 2015 14: 48
        Next to the spy satellite, another satellite or rocket will fly by and all the electronics of the spy will fail. And the name of the complex is not rubella, but RED.
        1. -2
          12 November 2015 15: 51
          Quote: cergey51046
          Another spy satellite will fly next to the spy satellite

          1. What and how?


          we do not have interceptor satellites or other satellites with EMO

          And who will just look at the "next".
          The impact on OSG is the fact of an open attack (both with us and with them), respectively, the answer

          2. It will not work. In order to disable the avionics of Lacrosa, one has to make great efforts.
          There is all the Space class (our 5/9 + PC version)


          In the framework of the operation “Fishbow” was supposed to carry out an explosion of a nuclear charge W-49 power 1,4 Mt at an altitude of about 400 kilometers (Starfish (Starfish)).



          On July 9, 1962, the Tor missile was fired from 195. The explosion looked amazing - the nuclear glow was visible on Wake Island at a distance of 2200 kilometers, on Kwajalein Atoll (2600 kilometers), and even in New Zealand, 7000 kilometers south of Johnston!

          The Soviet Cosmos-5 satellite (NSSDC ID: 1962-020A), being 1200 kilometers below the explosion horizon, recorded an instant increase in gamma radiation intensity several orders of magnitude followed by a decrease of two orders of magnitude in 100 seconds.

          Deorbit May 2, 1963. Planned. Worked great on time
          3. Why then fence the garden with 1RL257, if so easy
          Quote: cergey51046
          another satellite or rocket will fly by and all the electronics of the spy will fail.


          Quote: cergey51046
          And the name of the complex is not rubella, but RED.

          Why are you?
          And rubella and rubella - ONE AND SAME, these synonyms
          Quote: opus

          Rubella is a highly infectious acute infectious disease.
          No error
          Kraukha is a tabooistic name for rubella, from red; see Brandt, RFV 22, 141
          1. 0
            12 November 2015 23: 20
            And if the performance characteristics are, to put it mildly, underestimated? The limit of work in elevation is not +85?
            1. 0
              13 November 2015 01: 43
              Quote: Oleko
              And if the performance characteristics are, to put it mildly, underestimated? The limit of work in elevation is not +85?

              Hardly.
              There is a mechanical restriction (As in the Fort SAM).
              Not intended Krasuha against Lacrosse fight, can not
              1. +1
                13 November 2015 04: 20
                Quote: opus
                Tk. the elevation angle is 85 degrees, then there remains a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees. That at an altitude of Locros' orbit of 700 km will give a "hole" with an area of ​​a spherical segment of about 115 426 923,5 sq. km 115,5 million sq. km of the sky will not be covered (if Lacros flies over the object).

                What if the object does not stand in a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees? And next to it, exactly +85? Full capture of the Krasukha is assured. What will lacrosse see with its super powerful pulses? A lonely car. And why compare the radiation powers of antennas? Will the orbital enemy pierce our beauty or not? These are the vague doubts that torment me.
                At the airbase, the electronic warfare complex is on the edge. Near the runway.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. 0
                  13 November 2015 12: 47
                  Quote: Oleko
                  And if the object does not stand in a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees.? And next to it, exactly 85?

                  let him stand where he wants.

                  If the satellite is in the dead zone, the sense of zero
                  1. If the interference from the REP complex does not arrive at the receiving surface of the radar interference
                  2. If the interference does not change (jamming, distorting, clogging) the reflected radar signal - there is no interference
                  3. Phantom objects against the background of the underlying surface of the Earth are very difficult to create (this is not a flying object)
                  4. Lacrosse has a very specific BRLK: "hits" underground (data on the depth of penetration are unknown), will open command bunkers, silos, communications
                  Subsurface sounding radar
                  signals with a frequency of 500-900 MHz can penetrate to a depth of 1-3 m and provide a resolution of up to 10 cm, and with a frequency of 80-300 MHz penetrate to a depth of 9-25 m, but the resolution is about 1,5 m.
                  5. U Lacros, like these


                  synthesized side aperture radar

                  PCA. Synthesizing an aperture is a technical technique that can significantly increase the radar resolution in the transverse direction with respect to the flight direction and obtain a detailed image of the radar map of the terrain over which the aircraft is flying.
          2. +1
            12 November 2015 23: 55
            Quote: opus
            The impact on OSG is the fact of an open attack (both with us and with them), respectively, the answer

            satellite motion has a certain trajectory! and purely mathematically, knowing when and at what point it was withdrawn, you can imagine when and where it will be located !!!
            But how is the connection with the satellite? and as he scans the surface of the earth, so give him noise on the air!
            There is still a small aspect in the development of the laser! this is not a bunch of narrowly directed radiation flux, more precisely a bunch, but electronic magnetic radiation !!!
            and from here
            In order to disable the avionics of Lacrosa, one has to make great efforts.
            There is all the Space class (our 5/9 + PC version)

            near the high-voltage electric transmission line, a lot fades
            1. 0
              13 November 2015 02: 04
              Quote: SpnSr
              and purely mathematically, knowing when and in which

              Two "Lacros" scan a strip of 4000 km WIDTH, you will be tired of furnishing yourself with rubies
              Quote: SpnSr
              But how is the connection with the satellite? and as he scans the surface of the earth, so give him noise on the air!

              through USGS to ground-based data centers:
              SC "DSTsS-3", SC "Flitsatcom" and "Ufo", SC "SDS", SC "Milstar", and SC "Afsatcom" Air Force communication system. Grouping allows you to organize communication simultaneously in any combination, in any direction, when a large number of ground stations are operating simultaneously. It allows multiple ground stations to operate simultaneously through the same repeater by multiplexing the signals in frequency, time and shape.
              Quote: SpnSr
              this is not a bunch of narrowly directed radiation flux, more precisely a bunch, but electronic magnetic radiation !!!

              or a bunch of elementary particles without rest mass - photons
              The dualism of light.
              Of course, I don’t understand that light is an electromagnetic wave, but something tells me that it (light) is also an Elementary particle.

              And what follows from your thought?
              Quote: SpnSr
              near the high-voltage electric transmission line, a lot fades

              1. At an altitude of 700 km there is no power line
              2. Microcircuits "Lacrosa" withstand a radiation dose of 1 million rad (a man moves horses after 500-1000 glad)
              "Background" from the power line to the Space class - according to FIG, the Millitary class microcircuits, however, the same
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      13 November 2015 14: 32
      Somewhere my comments and your answers have gone. Anyway. I looked through everything that is possible on "Krasukha4". There is no angle limit. The operating radius is 300 km. In one place it is said that "jamming" the radar of all types of aircraft of the "probable partner", in another article it is about satellites. "Mattress byaka" has been circling the ground for 9 years. Judging by the date in the photo. I think that during this time, knowing the performance characteristics of Lacrosse, they came up with a reaction. To declare that, they say, we and the satellites "can", as a PR, I do not think it is serious. "Krasukha4" joined the troops in 2014. This means that combat work is underway at the base. But in the December 20, 2013 article, there is not a word about satellites. Maybe the curtain has been lifted a little? With respect and gratitude for the detailed material.
      1. -1
        13 November 2015 17: 13
        Quote: Oleko
        I looked through everything that is possible on "Krasukha4". H

        They are not (TTX), even the "brothers", the smaller ones, who are not brothers to us, as it were

        Quote: Oleko
        . There is no restriction on elevation.

        there is. this can be seen even in the photo (the position of the module for determining and reproducing the frequency (SOVCh) - “Chamomile”







        Quote: Oleko
        The range is 300 km.

        Lacros fly at altitudes below 700km

        What can I talk about?
        / The anti-satellite effect mule arose when a “camomile” was being tuned at the factory, they were called that their work was interfering with the satellite's operation.
        Low-orbit (at an altitude of 200 km) ... well, then "it started"
        1. 0
          14 November 2015 14: 18
          the possibilities are limited but they are enough to suppress the signal in the war zone with the area of ​​the city)
          1. 0
            14 November 2015 18: 09
            Quote: gerodot
            to suppress the signal in the war zone area of ​​city)

            Ground and air means.
            Yes.
            No doubt.
            about KA and "Lacros" - nonsense.




            "suppression": send a false signal to the receiving antenna, or block the receiving channel.
            But this cannot be done having a range of 200-300 km against a satellite in an orbit of 700 km, and even with a "hole" in the zone.
        2. 0
          20 February 2018 16: 46
          Full bullshit about interference during setup. Some uneducated journalist blurted out without understanding. In addition, the open space at full power never worked when setting up. For a very long time, the interference was to television repeaters when the SPR-2 worked in the decimeter range.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  27. 0
    12 November 2015 14: 42
    Apparently this is one of the elements of our asymmetric response. Tse garno! good And who will tell you, does our strategic friends have something like that?
  28. 0
    12 November 2015 17: 22
    Phushington complains - we see and hear nothing, we can’t fly. The time of boasting in its superiority is over, the time has come to think.
  29. +11
    12 November 2015 20: 55
    Quote: opus
    Quote: Koshak
    Not "rubbish", but "rubbish"

    Well, I'm sorry, this is written automatically by the hands.
    1. Rubella - highly infectious acute infectious disease.
    No error
    Krasukha taboo rubella, from red; see Brandt, RFV 22, 141.

    2. It is unlikely that the creators of 1RL257 had in mind
    Krauha = belladonna, whitefly, white companion, mad cherry, mad berry, bobovnik, snake grass, krasava, beauty, belladonna, krasena, krasheka, krasovitka, krasulya, plant, sleepy fool

    "Belladons = belladonna = krasukha tried, or ate wolfberry, so she introduced herself"

    "Maybe she didn’t dress for the weather, so" krasuha "ruined her"

    Krasukha, a village in the Pskov region, destroyed by the Nazis during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–45

    For quoting you took less voluminous your comment. but it concerns just your other comments.
    Always a pleasure to read the opinion of a professional drinks , I agree with you on all the position (by the way, in this thread this is the only thing that is pleasant to read, because "URA" is in our blood and this is certainly good, but has little to do with the topic). Only it seems to me that the above equipment is not used there, there are a lot of docks with the results of the work (according to the data provided by the work "600 km of coverage and the space constellation" and stated in the article performance characteristics). One explanation, no one will declassify what is not necessary, let it be "Krasuha" wink .
    Based on the foregoing, the only conclusion:
    "Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, in connection with the officially confirmed sexual orientation of the United States by President Obama, we kindly ask you not to call them our partners. hi
    1. +8
      13 November 2015 00: 05
      Quote: NIKNN
      "Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, in connection with the officially confirmed sexual orientation of the United States by President Obama, we kindly ask you not to call them our partners.

      I join!
  30. 0
    12 November 2015 21: 17
    Quote: Oleneboy_
    I agree about stupid bombs laughing
    as THEIR General recently stated, our EW capabilities do not reach even one tenth of the capabilities of EW Russia

    It's time for them all to treat their stupid brains
  31. 0
    13 November 2015 10: 56
    Interestingly, is there exposure if you are standing nearby? Hair, probably fall out or something else?
  32. 0
    13 November 2015 14: 55
    Not a big remark about Lacrosse:
    But it does not work on aerodynamic objects, but only on stat. and sedentary (structures, ICBM launchers, armored vehicle groups, etc., this is, so to speak, a radar image of the area on which "radio-contrast" objects have come across). He is not able to work in a dynamic mode, just hang. It will not be able to detect an airplane, let alone the flight characteristics with the required accuracy and discreteness.
  33. 0
    13 November 2015 16: 14
    And satellite images somehow does not make?
  34. +1
    13 November 2015 16: 39
    I am proud of our scientists, engineers and military!
    Despite all the problems - they work, and how they work!
    Nice damn it! ....
  35. 0
    13 November 2015 17: 29
    Quote: partizan86
    And satellite images somehow does not make?

    Lacrosse can only be used for reconnaissance purposes, but in the event of hostilities?
    Systems of electronic countermeasures and electronic intelligence of such a class as Krasukha-4 their main task is the defense against high-precision weapons, their carriers, detection and target designation systems.
  36. +1
    14 November 2015 01: 43
    It looks like a venus flytrap.
  37. 0
    14 November 2015 14: 11
    without communication with the "owner" of the igils, a bunch of mischief-makers who went out to plunder
  38. 0
    14 November 2015 16: 51
    From our "krasuha" they have rubella at once pours out. Not fatal, of course, but very itchy and itchy.
  39. 0
    14 November 2015 22: 24
    Maybe not there, sorry. "Krasuha" is good. But should we make excuses for effectively covering our bases abroad? Well, like howl went up for the S-400. How long? Or quadruple Maxims from warehouses against Alakhabar? Why should we justify ourselves for not being in our Rush?)) What we want abroad is that we cover the bases!
  40. +1
    15 November 2015 08: 09
    Hello everyone! I did not find where to post such an opinion. Tell me sites, pzhst. Maybe someone will answer here.
    So. Attack on PARIS. O PaRRRi, O Marrrri ... When Libya was bombed ... This is far. Afghanistan. Iraq. Why are you so bad? I do not mind Paris. I do not mind Montmartre. Because there is no longer FRANCE.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      15 November 2015 08: 16
      Quote: magdama
      I do not mind Paris. I do not mind Montmartre. Because there is no longer FRANCE.

      - Summer and again I want to go to Paris!
      -Have you been to Paris?

      -No, but already wanted to

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"