"Krasuha-4" covers the Russian airbase in Syria from intelligence satellites and radar E-8 JSTARS

In October, many publications reported that the Krasukha-4 multifunctional interference module was deployed on Hamish’s base in Syria. What are the possibilities of this complex? The correspondent tried to answer this question. Messenger of Mordovia Denis Peredrienko, who last month visited the Day of Innovation of the Central Military District. The military shared some information with the journalist.


"Krasuha-4" covers the Russian airbase in Syria from intelligence satellites and radar E-8 JSTARS


“Product 1RL257 is intended for covering ground and air objects from aerial and space reconnaissance, aimed strikes aviation enemy by electronic suppression of airborne radars.





Limits of operation: in azimuth 360 degrees and in elevation - from -1 to + 85 degrees.





“Krasuha-4” has the following throughput: 1 radar of the spacecraft and 1 aircraft of the combat control and targeting system of the E-8 JSTARS or 11 radar of tactical aircraft.





The radius of the cover zone during the suppression of the radar of tactical aircraft strike aircraft is 11-19 km, reconnaissance and attack systems-16-41 km, and spacecraft-15-25 km. Deployment time is up to 20 minutes.





“Krasuha-4” is mounted on the chassis of four-axle KAMAZ 63501 all-terrain vehicles. ”
Photos used:
http://vestnik-rm.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. self-propelled 12 November 2015 12: 13 New
      • 52
      • 0
      +52
      back in early October, in the video of the Zvezda TV channel, a video showing the moment of the return of the Russian Su-25 attack aircraft to the Khmeimim airfield from a combat mission, the complex based on the KAMAZ car with a characteristic set of antennas is clearly visible in the background
      1. Tor5
        Tor5 12 November 2015 12: 45 New
        • 15
        • 0
        +15
        Good deal! So let them now search all over the desert!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Oman 47 13 November 2015 00: 30 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        So here you are, Russian "CHEBURASHKA" belay (see photo)

        This is what the Kakhla squealed ...
        1. spiriolla-45 14 November 2015 14: 42 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Cheburashka, then they called the Pinocchio flamethrower.
    2. Andrey Yuryevich 12 November 2015 12: 19 New
      • 52
      • 0
      +52
      this, apparently, is what the supreme commander of NATO, General Philip Breedlove called a "bubble" that prevents NATO "litak" from flying ...
      1. Alexey-74 12 November 2015 12: 45 New
        • 14
        • 0
        +14
        for sure, this is the famous Russian bubble for which NATO members cannot peep
        1. Prapor-527 12 November 2015 13: 00 New
          • 26
          • 0
          +26
          Well, isn’t "Kraukha"? .. bully
          1. LeftPers 13 November 2015 05: 18 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            "Beauty" is a beauty laughing
        2. severniy 12 November 2015 13: 14 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          it’s still there ..., the general was crying about the 600 km zone. diameter fellow .
          Blinded by radar, disrupted the electronic guidance systems, as well as set a hindrance satellite imagery in the "bubble" in diameter 600 km, according to one of NATO generals in the publication Daily OSNet.

          or is it "fear has big eyes" belay ??? ....
          1. Y34Gagarin 12 November 2015 14: 16 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            Could it be like with a caliber? These specifications may be kept secret.
            1. NEXUS 13 November 2015 20: 01 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Y34Gagarin
              Could it be like with a caliber? These specifications may be kept secret.

              They are a secret ... but the fact that Krasuha-4 is capable of dazzling and drowning AWACS already says a lot. With regards to UAVs, it’s like a "light breakfast."
              Somewhere infa caught my eye that there is already an experienced prototype of Krasukha-5 ...
        3. Mister22408 13 November 2015 21: 19 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          He doesn’t block optics, Mezhopoptik also. The role of the ANN in the SU is growing, but ... Here another device comes onto the scene ... Probably this is Tetris laughing
      2. Prapor-527 12 November 2015 13: 25 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        These "flyers" are afraid of the presence of the Russian air forces on the territory of Syria ... A good reason not to get into their "super-duper cool" F-16 ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Mera joota 12 November 2015 13: 48 New
          • -99
          • 0
          -99
          Quote: Prapor-527
          These "flyers" are afraid of the presence of the Russian air forces on the territory of Syria ... A good reason not to get into their "super-duper cool" F-16 ...

          Oh, how afraid they are ... It is a pity that the Israeli pilots who damned Damascus airport yesterday morning do not know about the "600km bubble", I must tell them, let them fear too ...
          1. Prapor-527 12 November 2015 14: 17 New
            • 28
            • 0
            +28
            Clap your hands ... Your favorite resource "censor.net" did not confirm the information.
          2. mitrich 12 November 2015 14: 28 New
            • 29
            • 0
            +29
            Which airport did the Jews take yesterday? I have not heard. belay Link, pliz.
            1. Banshee 12 November 2015 14: 31 New
              • 30
              • 0
              +30
              Jews, too, do not know. Only on the censor squealed on this topic.
              1. atalef 12 November 2015 22: 16 New
                • -3
                • 0
                -3
                Quote: Banshee
                Jews, too, do not know. Only on the censor squealed on this topic.

                Hey . Novel
                Yesterday already infa passed.
                Hezbollah’s weapons depots were bombed at Damascus Airport.
                1. Akuzenka 14 November 2015 03: 03 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Provocateur.
              2. Sandov 12 November 2015 22: 53 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Roman, doesn’t Israel cooperate with us?
                1. Catafract 13 November 2015 01: 17 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  so without an agreement they wouldn’t have snooped in, Israel immediately declared that it would not allow the armament of the militants of hezboloid.
                2. Akuzenka 14 November 2015 03: 04 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  No, Israel is collaborating with itself and with its undertaker.
            2. Ahmed 12 November 2015 22: 06 New
              • -2
              • 0
              -2
              Quote: mitrich
              Which airport did the Jews take yesterday? I have not heard. belay Link, pliz.




              what
              The fact of airstrike took place to be, but who exactly - is still in question.
              Jerusalem "refuses to comment," and this is usually a sign that they are all the same.

              http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/11/report-israel-strikes-t
              arget-in-syria / 415446 /
            3. The comment was deleted.
          3. quote 12 November 2015 17: 45 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Mera Joota
            Damascus Airport

            Is there a mask on your face or brain?
            1. wanderer 12 November 2015 19: 01 New
              • -2
              • 0
              -2
              I don’t know ours or not, but someone has built up a warehouse with weapons of Hezbollah or a convoy with weapons near a damask airport. A farce (Iranian) agency reports the Lebanese media, I read on the news.
              1. kolyhalovs 13 November 2015 12: 33 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                It's you about that raid that was in December 2014, I think so, because I don’t know about other Google. Ukrainians carry it now. The rest is almost a year ago.
              2. maks007 13 November 2015 20: 17 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Jacob Kedmi: Attack on Damascus Airport was agreed with Russia
                http://warfiles.ru/show-100001-yakov-kedmi-ataka-na-aeroport-damaska-byla-soglas
                ovana-s-rossiey.html
          4. Etric 12 November 2015 21: 37 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            proof in studio
            1. wanderer 12 November 2015 21: 59 New
              • -7
              • 0
              -7
              Go to newsru.co.il
            2. atalef 12 November 2015 22: 20 New
              • -13
              • 0
              -13
              Quote: Etric
              proof in studio

              please
              The purpose of the air strikes, according to foreign media reports inflicted by the Israeli Air Force near the Damascus airport in Syria, was the storage of weapons for Hezbollah.

              However, according to the Syrian information portal Damascus Alan, all the army outposts around the airport were severely damaged, but there were no casualties among the people.
              At the same time, Syrian opposition activist Ahmed Yabrudi wrote that "Israeli military aircraft entered the airspace of southern Lebanon, turned to Al-Kalamoun Pass (on the Lebanese-Syrian border) and passed over the international airport in Damascus, where they attacked near military outposts " He also noted that these outposts belonged to Hezbollah.
              1. Akuzenka 14 November 2015 03: 14 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Yeah, Israel hit again, bypassing international law. Israel will be horseradish - I will be silent. They ran into themselves, there is nothing to fulfill the will of the black master.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. Ahmed 12 November 2015 22: 21 New
              • -2
              • 0
              -2
              Quote: Etric
              proof in the studio ...


              Watch from 4: 00

              1. Sandov 12 November 2015 22: 51 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                And whose channel is it broadcasting?
                1. Ahmed 13 November 2015 03: 02 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Sandov
                  And whose channel is it broadcasting?


                  Syrian.

                  Orient news (Previously known as Television al-Mashreq TV) is news TV channel owned by Ghassan Abboud, a Syrian businessman and journalist.


                  1. Akuzenka 14 November 2015 03: 16 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Strange, the letter is Jewish, but Syria is broadcasting. Ahahha
                2. 3officer 13 November 2015 03: 23 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Not a jester is clear, but judging by the selection, the channel is moderate and private apparently.
                  And if the Tsakhal really bombed, it’s not a matter of great disappointment (HZB stocks are not a pity, but it looks like a slap in the face of Russia)
                  1. Ahmed 13 November 2015 11: 33 New
                    • -2
                    • 0
                    -2
                    Quote: 3officer
                    ... but it looks like a slap in the face of Russia ...


                    And in what exactly?
                    Israel warned that it would not sacrifice its own security issues? - warned. yes
                    Putin agreed on this issue with Netanyahu? - Agreed. yes

                    Everything was exactly as agreed, Israel does not prevent the Russian Air Force from achieving its goals, and Russia does not prevent the IDF from reaching its own (in its own “backyard”), they are conducting closed-door dialogue on controversial issues - this was an agreement. request
                    Food for thought: why the Kremlin suddenly recognized part of Assad’s enemies as legitimate negotiating partners, that part Israel’s suspected contacts. request

                    Py.Sy.
                    It is rather common sense slap on conceit of patriots.
                    Nefig was screaming - "we say the coolest, the masters of the Syrian sky and we are all afraid of us", then we would not now be in the position of those caught in empty bragging. request
                    1. Akuzenka 14 November 2015 03: 19 New
                      • 3
                      • 0
                      +3
                      Strange, Israel. The tension in the region is removed, you feel bad. So do not wait for concessions from ISIS. Ah, sorry, you are their bank, I'm sorry. Say hello to the black master and prepare the coffins for yourself, will rise in price soon. ISIS also wants to live.
              2. Absurdidat 12 November 2015 22: 51 New
                • -3
                • 0
                -3
                Recruitment for a couple of months, probably even more
                1. Ahmed 13 November 2015 03: 12 New
                  • -5
                  • 0
                  -5
                  Quote: Absurdidat
                  Recruitment for a couple of months, probably even more


                  This is the Orient News newsletter dated 11.11.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX.

                  Language should follow the thought, and not vice versa.

                  I understand that you don’t understand Belmes, in Arabic, and this, in turn, makes your "weighty peremptory opinion" about this video completely incompetent and petty.
                  1. Akuzenka 14 November 2015 03: 21 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Ahmetka, is that your lady? Drop it, go to p ..... sys, they pay more there.
          5. Vlad5307 13 November 2015 17: 07 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            You minus - every "duck" must be checked before you quack on the site! wassat
          6. Ml555 13 November 2015 18: 30 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            What did you forget here with your filthy mouth ??)
          7. Ile ham 13 November 2015 23: 54 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            What did you smoke the day before? You can not do it this way! And then Cheburashka with Kraukhov will come to visit ...
          8. Svidetel 45 14 November 2015 08: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            From rage and start to rave already started? Go to the doctor, it can be treated.
          9. max91 15 November 2015 10: 35 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I don’t know where you got such data from, I heard that F16 fly only in Iraq
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Zlatik 13 November 2015 07: 54 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        NATO has a nightmare after a nightmare!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Yunik 12 November 2015 12: 09 New
    • 18
    • 0
    +18
    It is better to call it -Krasava-4)))
    1. Koshak 12 November 2015 12: 40 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Unique
      It is better to call it -Krasava-4)))

      I’ve already met several times that some “expert analysts” call her KrasNuha. In honor of childhood illness, or what?
      1. interceptor58 12 November 2015 12: 54 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Kraukha is in the common people belladonna or bilin. Everyone understands what bilina does with brains.
        1. igordok 12 November 2015 13: 54 New
          • 13
          • 0
          +13
          Quote: interceptor58
          Kraukha is in the common people belladonna or bilin.

          For residents of the Pskov region Krasuha is a village burned by the Germans, along with all the inhabitants in 1943. The same fate as the Belarusian Khatyn.

          1. cergey51046 12 November 2015 14: 29 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            They burned the same trigger.
        2. cergey51046 12 November 2015 14: 28 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Grass is called belladonna.
        3. S-cream 12 November 2015 22: 03 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          from the fifth time I realized that you had in mind WHITE, and wrote "BILINA"!
      2. Almatinets 12 November 2015 12: 54 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        KrasNuha at enemy pilots
      3. The comment was deleted.
  4. TSOOBER 12 November 2015 12: 09 New
    • 29
    • 0
    +29
    The news in the topic, if so, then this one is just great:
    -The first batch of systems that allow you to turn the Russian Su-34 front-line bomber into an electronic warfare aircraft will be delivered to the Russian Armed Forces in November this year. This was announced by the first deputy general director of the Concern Radioelectronic Technologies Igor Nasenkov.
    “The first batch will be delivered in November this year,” RIA Novosti quoted Nasenkov as speaking at the Dubai Airshow-2015.
    According to him, the systems will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, including long-range radar aircraft.

    Original news RT in Russian:
    https://russian.rt.com/article/129387
    1. Inok10 12 November 2015 12: 12 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      .. ahead of seconds .. hi
    2. science fiction writer 12 November 2015 12: 14 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      According to him, the systems will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, including long-range radar aircraft.

      Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.
      1. Koshak 12 November 2015 14: 30 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Quote: fiction
        Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.

        KAMAZ on the Su-24 is cool.
        1. science fiction writer 12 November 2015 14: 51 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Koshak
          Quote: fiction
          Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.

          KAMAZ on the Su-24 is cool.

          Read koment first TSOOBER
          Quote: TSOOBER
          The news in the topic, if so, then this one is just great:
          -The first batch of systems that allow you to turn the Russian Su-34 front-line bomber into an electronic warfare aircraft will be delivered to the Russian Armed Forces in November this year. This was announced by the first deputy general director of the Concern Radioelectronic Technologies Igor Nasenkov.
          “The first batch will be delivered in November this year,” RIA Novosti quoted Nasenkov as speaking at the Dubai Airshow-2015.
          According to him, the systems will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, including long-range radar aircraft.

          Original news RT in Russian:
          https://russian.rt.com/article/129387

          and comets TSOOBER was my question
          Is this the test piece passed over the KUK in the Black Sea.

          am fool wassat
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. igorka357 13 November 2015 23: 08 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Read carefully!
      2. cergey51046 12 November 2015 14: 31 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Over Cook was Perinei, there are still Himalayas.
      3. Banshee 12 November 2015 14: 32 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        No, there was quite prosaic "Khibina". However, enough.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Corsair0304 12 November 2015 12: 10 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    So on this occasion an American general was indignant like "a huge electron bubble prevents us from flying and observing"
    Ches word, I am proud of our defense industry. The adversary will again have to switch from missiles to guns and stupid bombs.
    1. Temples 12 November 2015 12: 15 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Time for the adversary to go to the grave.
    2. Oleneboy_ 12 November 2015 12: 23 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      I agree about stupid bombs laughing
      as THEIR General recently stated, our EW capabilities do not reach even one tenth of the capabilities of EW Russia
      1. Gogia 13 November 2015 21: 30 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Do not flatter yourself. They have plenty of technology.
        One bad thing: I spoke recently with a taxi driver - he was the former beginning of the lab. strength in a helicopter plant. Left to tax - ZP 2 times higher .... So it is at the aircraft factory. Orders seem to be there, but no RFP. Until this is reversed, there will be nothing super new and wonderful.

        PS It’s better to overestimate a possible adversary than to underestimate.
  7. avvg 12 November 2015 12: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Indeed, the name of the device corresponds, Beauty in Russian - "Beauty-4"
  8. Inok10 12 November 2015 12: 10 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    .. true path we go comrades .. in addition: ..
    DUBAI, Nov 12 - RIA News. The first batch of special containers to turn the Russian front-line Su-34 bomber into an electronic warfare aircraft (EW) will be delivered to the Russian Ministry of Defense in November this year, the first deputy general director of the Concern Radioelectronic Technologies (KRET, part of) said in an interview with RIA Novosti Rostec ") Igor Nasenkov.
    "The first batch will be delivered in November this year," Nasenkov said during the Dubai Airshow-2015 air show.
    At the wingtips of all Su-34s, the basic set of the multifunctional electronic warfare system "Khibiny-10V" is installed.
    "The Ministry of Defense will receive the first batch of so-called stackable containers mounted under the fuselage, which will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, long-range radar aircraft patrol and so on - that is, the protection of other aircraft of the group, "said the agency’s interlocutor.
    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20151112/1319117371.html#ixzz3rGZ9ZQAy

    .. hi
  9. Oleneboy_ 12 November 2015 12: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Murmansk-BN is all better. At 5000km everything cleans
  10. PQ-18 12 November 2015 12: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Still, a full-fledged anti-aircraft defense group was deployed so that the "partners" did not open their mouths to a land invasion of Syria ..
  11. oleggun 12 November 2015 12: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And rightly so. I think the NATO members are spying on our group in full.
  12. sever.56 12 November 2015 12: 14 New
    • 20
    • 0
    +20
    In the mid-seventies he served in the RTV unit, where the ancestors of this magnificent weapon were in service. Then we looked through, and if necessary, could blind airplanes over the whole of Scandinavia, and to the west we got to Germany. Modern Russian electronic warfare equipment is simply fantastic in its capabilities!
    1. Balbesoid 13 November 2015 03: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Uncle, are you a Murmansk adit ?! Tooth is full of everything, already shining !!! wink
  13. bad
    bad 12 November 2015 12: 15 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    so that no one writes or speaks about our electronic warfare equipment, it is obvious that they are very effective .. no doubt .. and their characteristics for open access are clearly underestimated laughing adversary in a big bummer ... but we still don’t know much .. for those who are interested - Electronic War - TV Channel "Star"
    http://tvzvezda.ru/video/docfilms/content/201502261512-zave.htm/
  14. Enot-poloskun 12 November 2015 12: 19 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    NATO officials recently wrote about the "radar bubble" over Syria.

    Is it not thanks to "Beauty"?
  15. Mikhail Krapivin 12 November 2015 12: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The main thing is not to slow down, but to snicker! In terms of developing further at a double pace, so that the Yankees will remain far behind :)
  16. v1tz 12 November 2015 12: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It looks intimidating ... especially the mast, with objects in a circle similar to flashlights.
  17. roskot 12 November 2015 12: 35 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    NATO spies. But the bubble is in the way. The beauty is called.
  18. feniks 12 November 2015 12: 40 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Our scientific heads, however, also with humor: "Rubella", "Sun", "Pinocchio",
    Well, we wish our scientists good health, and create excellent weapons to protect our homeland.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. Koshak 12 November 2015 12: 47 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: feniks
    Our scientific heads, however, also with humor: Rubella, Solntsepek, Pinocchio
    about"...

    KrasНear is a viral disease. It’s time to recall and read the title.
  20. kill the fascist 12 November 2015 12: 47 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    so here it is what kind of Syrian "electronic bubble" you are :)
  21. feniks 12 November 2015 12: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    this, apparently, is what the supreme commander of NATO, General Philip Breedlove called a "bubble" that prevents NATO "litak" from flying ...


    It is on the "Rubella-4" that the US military "complain", claiming that a dome with a diameter of 600 kilometers was completely impenetrable for electronic reconnaissance over Latakia.
    1. Mera joota 12 November 2015 13: 02 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: feniks
      It is on the "Rubella-4" that the US military "complain", claiming that a dome with a diameter of 600 kilometers was completely impenetrable for electronic reconnaissance over Latakia.

      The real radius does not bother? Or didn’t read to the digital?
    2. Mera joota 12 November 2015 13: 02 New
      • -5
      • 0
      -5
      Quote: feniks
      It is on the "Rubella-4" that the US military "complain", claiming that a dome with a diameter of 600 kilometers was completely impenetrable for electronic reconnaissance over Latakia.

      The real radius does not bother? Or didn’t read to the digital?
      1. cergey51046 12 November 2015 14: 37 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        A radius of 17 km in one installation. You can put them as you like, and you won’t see the whole country.
        1. interceptor58 20 February 2018 16: 25 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          The radius of the cover, not the radius of detection and suppression. A missile should not fly 17 km to a concealed target.
  22. feniks 12 November 2015 13: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Mera Joota
    The real radius does not bother? Or didn’t read to the digital?


    Here is the link: http: //svpressa.ru/war21/article/135828/? Rss = 1
  23. stone 12 November 2015 13: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "Krasuha-4" covers the Russian airbase in Syria from intelligence satellites and radar E-8 JSTARS

    And how can it interfere with satellites?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Mera joota 12 November 2015 13: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: stone
      And how can it interfere with satellites?

      This refers to reconnaissance radar satellites. In general, side-scan radars with synthesized aperture are interfered with.
      Optical reconnaissance satellites are highly dependent on weather conditions. A small cloud can close a large area for example ...
      1. beer-youk 12 November 2015 19: 17 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        I’ll clarify. The last US satellite capable of conducting optical reconnaissance safely left orbit in 2008, giving way to a "more advanced" electronic digital. Because all satellite images of the United States since then are either European, or "completely classified", or Photoshop.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Mera joota 13 November 2015 08: 42 New
          • -3
          • 0
          -3
          Quote: beer-youk
          The last US satellite capable of conducting optical reconnaissance safely left orbit in 2008, giving way to a "more advanced" electronic digital. Therefore, all satellite images of the United States since then are either European, or "completely classified", or Photoshop.

          Electron-optical means with a digital camera. Is this a discovery for you?
          1. CTEPX 13 November 2015 17: 49 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: beer-youk
            The last US satellite capable of conducting optical reconnaissance safely left orbit in 2008, giving way to a "more advanced" electronic digital.
            Quote: Mera Joota
            Electron Optical Means

            The interference caused by electronic warfare is useless against a film camera)). Is this a discovery for you?
    3. interceptor58 20 February 2018 16: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Radar when viewing the surface in the overview and detailed modes.
  24. Rriv 12 November 2015 13: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    How does the inclusion of these funds affect the operation of our CEA on our technology?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Mera joota 12 November 2015 13: 42 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: RRiv
      How does the inclusion of these funds affect the operation of our CEA on our technology?

      Yes, in general, nothing. The station detects the operation of the side-view radar, determines the frequency and interferes with it.
  25. Proud. 12 November 2015 13: 47 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Here is a real Cheburator!
    1. igordok 12 November 2015 13: 57 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Be proud.
      Here is a real Cheburator!

      Yes, the ears match.
      1. Banshee 12 November 2015 14: 34 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Ears got it from the "Cheburashka" - SPN-30. Excellent antenna emitters.
  26. opus 12 November 2015 13: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Author
    The radius of the cover zone when suppressing the radar of tactical aircraft attack aircraft - 11-19 km, reconnaissance and strike systems - 16-41 km, spacecraft - 15-25 km. Deployment time - up to 20 minutes.


    Like yes.


    The purpose of the station is covering stationary objects from airborne radar reconnaissance radars of the E-8C Dzhistars aircraft, multi-functional radar of strike aircraft, reconnaissance and reconnaissance-strike UAVs Global Haw and Predator, Radar AES "Lacrosse".

    It’s not very clear how this (satellite) can be accomplished by having
    Quote: Author
    Work limits: in azimuth of 360 degrees and in elevation - from -1 to +85 degrees.

    ?
    1. The orbital construction of the Lacrosse -3,4,5 system (USA-133, USA-152 and USA-182)
    and on-board equipment capabilities allow reconnaissance of Russian territory with two spacecraft with a range of 4000 km - more than 9 hours a day, with three spacecraft - more than 14 hours a day.

    Tk. elevation angle of 85g, there remains a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees.
    That at a Lokros orbit height of 700 km, it will give a “hole” with an area of ​​a spherical segment of about 115 sq. Km
    115,5 million square kilometers of the sky will not be covered (if Lacros flies over the object).

    Lacros will be in this "hole": 3700 km: 7,9 km / s = 468,5 seconds = almost 8 minutes

    The Lacrosa radar alternately transmits and receives pulses at specific microwave wavelengths (in the range from 1 cm to 1 m, which corresponds in the frequency range from about 300 MHz to 30 GHz) and polarization (waves polarized in one vertical or horizontal plane).

    To obtain a radar image, about 1500 powerful pulses per second are transmitted to the target area or images, each pulse has a pulse width (pulse-width pulse) of typically 10-50 microseconds.
    Those. Image Satellite will receive





    1. opus 12 November 2015 14: 03 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      2. Even if we assume that not the ADS-10, but the ADS-30 are working on the REP
      ADS-30: Marine diesel power station ADS 30-T400 TP manufactured by VEPR, based on the original Perkins engine (Great Britain) (Rubella-4), Power 24,5 kW from the generator

      ADS10: Boar ADC 10 - Т400 РЯ - three-phase stationary diesel power station; , equipped with an engine of the brand Yanmar 3TNE78G1 / 3TNV82GGE, Power 10,0 kW with generator

      Jammers power will hardly exceed 4kW at the antenna output

      There are no clear data on Lacrosse, but probably SB, with a span of 45 m, and large batteries give up to 20 kW on the sunny side and 10 kW on the night.

      In terms of radiation power, they are almost parity.
      But Rubella needs to provide the azimuthal speed (mechanically) of tracking the satellite: 0,06 deg / s. Lacros-FAR, and the PCA mode

      Lacrosse-VEGA ONYX (L-5) -FAR with RSA


      The synthetic aperture method makes it possible to obtain a significant increase in spatial resolution due to the multiple acquisition of an image of one surface element from different viewing angles, in comparison with an ordinary radar.
      Antennas installed on satellites can also be used in a passive mode, receiving signals radiated from the earth or signals from other satellites (radar) reflected from the Earth.

      3.In addition to the radar, the Lacrosa have

      (Their rubella will not block)
      1. Koshak 12 November 2015 14: 36 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: opus
        (Their rubella will not block)

        Yes, how much can you? Not "beauty", but "beauty"
        1. opus 12 November 2015 14: 52 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Koshak
          Not "beauty", but "beauty"

          Well, I'm sorry, this is written automatically by the hands.
          1. Rubella - highly infectious acute infectious disease.
          No error
          Krasukha taboo rubella, from red; see Brandt, RFV 22, 141.

          2. It is unlikely that the creators of 1RL257 had in mind
          Krauha = belladonna, whitefly, white companion, mad cherry, mad berry, bobovnik, snake grass, krasava, beauty, belladonna, krasena, krasheka, krasovitka, krasulya, plant, sleepy fool

          "Belladona = belladonna = krasuha tried, or ate a wolfberry, so she introduced herself"

          "Maybe she didn’t dress according to the weather, so she killed her" krasukha "

          Krasukha, a village in the Pskov region, destroyed by the Nazis during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–45
      2. cergey51046 12 November 2015 14: 48 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Next to the spy satellite, another satellite or rocket will fly by and all the electronics of the spy will fail. And the name of the complex is not rubella, but RED.
        1. opus 12 November 2015 15: 51 New
          • -2
          • 0
          -2
          Quote: cergey51046
          Another spy satellite will fly next to the spy satellite

          1. What and how?


          we do not have interceptor satellites or other satellites with EMO

          And who will just look at the "next."
          The impact on OSG is the fact of an open attack (both with us and with them), respectively, the answer

          2. It will not work. In order to disable the avionics of Lacrosa, one has to make great efforts.
          There is all the Space class (our 5/9 + PC version)


          In the framework of the operation “Fishbow” was supposed to carry out an explosion of a nuclear charge W-49 power 1,4 Mt at an altitude of about 400 kilometers (Starfish (Starfish)).



          On July 9, 1962, the Tor missile was fired from 195. The explosion looked amazing - the nuclear glow was visible on Wake Island at a distance of 2200 kilometers, on Kwajalein Atoll (2600 kilometers), and even in New Zealand, 7000 kilometers south of Johnston!

          The Soviet Cosmos-5 satellite (NSSDC ID: 1962-020A), being 1200 kilometers below the explosion horizon, recorded an instant increase in gamma radiation intensity several orders of magnitude followed by a decrease of two orders of magnitude in 100 seconds.

          Descent from orbit on May 2, 1963. Planned. I worked perfectly on the due date
          3. Why then fence the garden with 1RL257, if so easy
          Quote: cergey51046
          another satellite or rocket will fly by and all the electronics of the spy will fail.


          Quote: cergey51046
          And the name of the complex is not rubella, but RED.

          Why are you?
          And rubella and rubella - ONE AND SAME, these synonyms
          Quote: opus

          Rubella is a highly infectious acute infectious disease.
          No error
          Kraukha is a tabooistic name for rubella, from red; see Brandt, RFV 22, 141
          1. Oleko 12 November 2015 23: 20 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And if the performance characteristics are, to put it mildly, underestimated? The limit of work in elevation is not +85?
            1. opus 13 November 2015 01: 43 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Oleko
              And if the performance characteristics are, to put it mildly, underestimated? The limit of work in elevation is not +85?

              Hardly.
              There is a mechanical restriction (As in the Fort SAM).
              Not intended Krasuha against Lacrosse fight, can not
              1. Oleko 13 November 2015 04: 20 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: opus
                Tk. elevation angle is 85 g, then there remains a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees. That at a Lokros orbit height of 700 km will give a “hole” with an area of ​​a spherical segment of about 115 426 923,5 square kilometers 115,5 million square kilometers of the sky will not be covered (if Lacros flies over the object).

                And if the object does not stand in a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees.? And next to it, exactly 85? Full capture of "Kraukha" is provided. What will lacrosse see with its superpower impulses? Lonely car. And why a comparison of the radiation powers of the antennas? Whether or not the beauty of the orbit will pierce our beauty? These are the vague doubts that torment me.
                At the airbase, the electronic warfare complex is on the edge. Near the runway.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. opus 13 November 2015 12: 47 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Oleko
                  And if the object does not stand in a window with a solid angle of 15 degrees.? And next to it, exactly 85?

                  let him stand where he wants.

                  If the satellite is in the dead zone, the sense of zero
                  1. If the interference from the REP complex does not arrive at the receiving surface of the radar interference
                  2. If the interference does not change (jamming, distorting, clogging) the reflected radar signal - there is no interference
                  3. Phantom objects against the background of the underlying surface of the Earth are very difficult to create (this is not a flying object)
                  4. Lacros has a very specific radar station: “hits” underground (data on penetration depth is unknown), will open command bunkers, silos, communications
                  Subsurface sounding radar
                  signals with a frequency of 500-900 MHz can penetrate to a depth of 1-3 m and provide a resolution of up to 10 cm, and with a frequency of 80-300 MHz penetrate to a depth of 9-25 m, but the resolution is about 1,5 m.
                  5. U Lacros, like these


                  synthesized side aperture radar

                  PCA. Synthesizing an aperture is a technical technique that can significantly increase the radar resolution in the transverse direction with respect to the flight direction and obtain a detailed image of the radar map of the terrain over which the aircraft is flying.
          2. Spnsr 12 November 2015 23: 55 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: opus
            The impact on OSG is the fact of an open attack (both with us and with them), respectively, the answer

            satellite motion has a certain trajectory! and purely mathematically, knowing when and at what point it was withdrawn, you can imagine when and where it will be located !!!
            But how is the connection with the satellite? and as he scans the surface of the earth, so give him noise on the air!
            There is still a small aspect in the development of the laser! this is not a bunch of narrowly directed radiation flux, more precisely a bunch, but electronic magnetic radiation !!!
            and from here
            In order to disable the avionics of Lacrosa, one has to make great efforts.
            There is all the Space class (our 5/9 + PC version)

            near the high-voltage electric transmission line, a lot fades
            1. opus 13 November 2015 02: 04 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: SpnSr
              and purely mathematically, knowing when and in which

              Two “Lacrosa” scan the band WIDTH 4000 km, you will be worn out
              Quote: SpnSr
              But how is the connection with the satellite? and as he scans the surface of the earth, so give him noise on the air!

              through USGS to ground-based data centers:
              Spacecraft DSSTS-3, Spacecraft Flitsatkom and UFO, Spacecraft SDS, Spacecraft Milstar, and Spacecraft communications system Afsatkom. Grouping allows you to organize communication simultaneously in any combination, in any direction, when a large number of ground stations are operating simultaneously. It allows many ground stations to simultaneously operate through the same repeater by compressing signals in frequency, time and shape.
              Quote: SpnSr
              this is not a bunch of narrowly directed radiation flux, more precisely a bunch, but electronic magnetic radiation !!!

              or a bunch of elementary particles without rest mass - photons
              The dualism of light.
              Of course, I don’t understand that light is an electromagnetic wave, but something tells me that it (light) is also an Elementary particle.

              And what follows from your thought?
              Quote: SpnSr
              near the high-voltage electric transmission line, a lot fades

              1. At an altitude of 700 km there is no power line
              2. Chips "Lacrosa" withstand a dose of 1 million rad (a man moves a horse after 500-1000 rad)
              "Background" from power lines to the Space class - according to FIG, the chips of the Millitary class, however, the same
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. Oleko 13 November 2015 14: 32 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Somewhere my comments and your answers have gone. Anyway. I looked through everything that is possible on "Kraukha4". There is no restriction on elevation. The range is 300 km. In one place it is said that it “suppresses” the radar of all types of “probable partner” aircraft, in another article it is about satellites. "Mattress Byaka" circling the earth for 9 years. Judging by the date in the photo. I think that during this time, knowing the performance characteristics of Lacros, they came up with a counteraction. To declare that, they say, we and the satellites "might", as a PR, I think not seriously. In the army "Krasukha4" went in 2014. So, the base is fighting. But in the article of December 20, 2013 there is not a word about the satellites. Maybe the veil is slightly lifted? With respect and gratitude for the detailed material.
      1. opus 13 November 2015 17: 13 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Quote: Oleko
        I looked through everything that is possible on "Kraukha4". N

        They are not (TTX), even among the "brothers", the smaller ones who are not brothers to us, as it were

        Quote: Oleko
        . There is no restriction on elevation.

        there is. this can be seen even in the photo (the position of the module for determining and reproducing the frequency (SOVCh) - “Chamomile”







        Quote: Oleko
        The range is 300 km.

        Lacros fly at altitudes below 700km

        What can I talk about?
        / A mule about the anti-satellite effect arose when a daisy was set up at the factory and they received a call that their work was interfering with the satellite.
        Low-orbit (at an altitude of 200 km) ... well, then it started
        1. gerodot 14 November 2015 14: 18 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          the possibilities are limited but they are enough to suppress the signal in the war zone with the area of ​​the city)
          1. opus 14 November 2015 18: 09 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: gerodot
            to suppress the signal in the war zone area of ​​city)

            Ground and air means.
            Yes.
            No doubt.
            about spacecraft and Lacros - nonsense.




            "suppression": send a false signal to the receiving antenna, or clog the receiving channel.
            But this cannot be done with a range of 200-300 km against a satellite in orbit of 700 km, and even with a “hole” in the zone.
        2. interceptor58 20 February 2018 16: 46 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Full bullshit about interference during setup. Some uneducated journalist blurted out without understanding. In addition, the open space at full power never worked when setting up. For a very long time, the interference was to television repeaters when the SPR-2 worked in the decimeter range.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  27. mitrich 12 November 2015 14: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Apparently this is one of the elements of our asymmetric response. Tse garno! good And who will tell you, does our strategic friends have something like that?
  28. tolmachiev51 12 November 2015 17: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Phushington complains - we see and hear nothing, we can’t fly. The time of boasting in its superiority is over, the time has come to think.
  29. NIKNN 12 November 2015 20: 55 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Quote: opus
    Quote: Koshak
    Not "beauty", but "beauty"

    Well, I'm sorry, this is written automatically by the hands.
    1. Rubella - highly infectious acute infectious disease.
    No error
    Krasukha taboo rubella, from red; see Brandt, RFV 22, 141.

    2. It is unlikely that the creators of 1RL257 had in mind
    Krauha = belladonna, whitefly, white companion, mad cherry, mad berry, bobovnik, snake grass, krasava, beauty, belladonna, krasena, krasheka, krasovitka, krasulya, plant, sleepy fool

    "Belladona = belladonna = krasuha tried, or ate a wolfberry, so she introduced herself"

    "Maybe she didn’t dress according to the weather, so she killed her" krasukha "

    Krasukha, a village in the Pskov region, destroyed by the Nazis during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–45

    For quoting you took less voluminous your comment. but it concerns just your other comments.
    Always a pleasure to read the opinion of a professional drinks , I agree with you on all positions (by the way, in this thread this is the only thing that is pleasant to read, because "Hurray" is in our blood and this is certainly good, but it has little to do with the topic). Only it seems to me that the equipment indicated above is used there, there are a lot of inconsistencies with the results of the work (according to the data provided by the work “600 km of coverage and space grouping” and stated in the TTX article). The explanation is that no one will declassify what is not necessary, let there be "Beauty" wink .
    Based on the foregoing, the only conclusion:
    "Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, in connection with the sexual orientation of the United States officially confirmed by President Obama, we kindly ask you not to call them our partners. hi
    1. Spnsr 13 November 2015 00: 05 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: NIKNN
      "Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, in connection with the sexual orientation of the United States officially confirmed by President Obama, we kindly ask you not to call them our partners.

      I join!
  30. Alex1313 12 November 2015 21: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Oleneboy_
    I agree about stupid bombs laughing
    as THEIR General recently stated, our EW capabilities do not reach even one tenth of the capabilities of EW Russia

    It's time for them all to treat their stupid brains
  31. innoker-1563 13 November 2015 10: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Interestingly, is there exposure if you are standing nearby? Hair, probably fall out or something else?
  32. maks007 13 November 2015 14: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Not a big remark about Lacrosse:
    But it does not work on aerodynamic objects, but only on stats. and inactive (structures, launchers of ICBMs, groupings of armored vehicles, etc. this is, so to speak, a radar image of the terrain in which "radio-contrast" objects are caught). He is not able to work in dynamic mode, just hang. Detect the plane, and even the flight characteristics with the necessary accuracy and discreteness, he will not master.
  33. partizan86 13 November 2015 16: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And satellite images somehow does not make?
  34. Mudroshvil 13 November 2015 16: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I am proud of our scientists, engineers and military!
    Despite all the problems - they work, and how they work!
    Nice damn it! ....
  35. maks007 13 November 2015 17: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: partizan86
    And satellite images somehow does not make?

    Lacrosse can only be used for reconnaissance purposes, but in the event of hostilities?
    Systems of electronic countermeasures and electronic intelligence of such a class as Krasukha-4 their main task is the defense against high-precision weapons, their carriers, detection and target designation systems.
  36. Alexdark 14 November 2015 01: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It looks like a venus flytrap.
  37. gerodot 14 November 2015 14: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    without communication with the "owner" of igil a bunch of idiots who came out to rob
  38. bannik 14 November 2015 16: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    From our "beauty" rubella at once spills out. Not fatal, of course, but very itchy and itchy.
  39. SerB60 14 November 2015 22: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Maybe not there, sorry. "Beauty" is good. But should we justify ourselves for effectively covering our bases abroad? Well, like a howl, he climbed beyond the S-400. How long? Or from the warehouses quad Maxim against alahabarov? What do we have to justify for being in a non-Russian rush?)) With what we want abroad, we cover the bases!
  40. magdama 15 November 2015 08: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Hello everyone! I did not find where to post such an opinion. Tell me sites, pzhst. Maybe someone will answer here.
    So. Attack on PARIS. O PaRRRi, O Marrrri ... When Libya was bombed ... This is far. Afghanistan. Iraq. Why are you so bad? I do not mind Paris. I do not mind Montmartre. Because there is no longer FRANCE.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. atalef 15 November 2015 08: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: magdama
      I do not mind Paris. I do not mind Montmartre. Because there is no longer FRANCE.

      - Summer and again I want to go to Paris!
      -Have you been to Paris?

      -No, but already wanted to