BBO: combatants will demonstrate a new weapon in action

43
Demonstration classes with demonstration of armament, which entered the army during 2014-2015, began at the bases of the combined-arms units of the Eastern District, RIA News message press service BBO.



"Training camps with battalion commanders and their deputies are held at the bases of motorized rifle formations stationed in the Khabarovsk, Primorsky, Kamchatka, Trans-Baikal Territories, Sakhalin, Amur, Jewish Autonomous Regions and the Republic of Buryatia," the release says.

“As part of the training camp, the officers will be shown in action samples of the latest weapons and military equipment supplied to the district. For example, the method of conducting live fires on tanks T-72B3, Strela-10MN and Tor air defense systems, Verba portable anti-aircraft missile systems, Tornado-G multiple launch rocket systems, ”the press service said.

It is reported that "the newest communication, electronic warfare, reconnaissance, radiation, chemical and biological protection and engineering equipment complexes" will also be demonstrated.

In total, more than a thousand officers will be trained.
  • RIA News. Alexander Wilf
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    11 November 2015 17: 23
    It is necessary not only to demonstrate, it is necessary to supply new weapons systems to the troops.
    1. +9
      11 November 2015 17: 28
      Quote: the most important
      it is necessary to supply new weapons systems to the troops

      and massively. And forget about contracts with "partners" until your own Army is forward.
      And the Yakuzam with the Chinese constantly show willingness.
      1. +7
        11 November 2015 17: 50
        Quote: Vladimir
        Quote: the most important
        it is necessary to supply new weapons systems to the troops

        and massively. And forget about contracts with "partners" until your own Army is forward.
        And the Yakuzam with the Chinese constantly show willingness.



        Of course, it’s better to supply everything to our army, but at least 50 to 50, they earned and delivered, and you also need to train the officers first, then the rest of the hp.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +11
        11 November 2015 18: 07
        Quote: Vladimir
        forget about contracts with "partners"

        it means arming our army at the expense of the people, if Iraq wants to pay 130% of the cost for our weapons, and he can, because he wants our weapons, then having sold three tanks to Iraq, we can put one tank into the army at the expense of another state.
        1. 0
          11 November 2015 22: 33
          Are you sure of this? And let the Topol brigade, we will lease it to Iran for 5 years, the money will be a shaft, and the World, yes to hell with it
          1. +1
            11 November 2015 23: 24
            Quote: 31rus
            Are you sure of this? And let the Topol brigade, we will lease it to Iran for 5 years, the money will be a shaft, and the World, yes to hell with it

            You should not juggle and consider everyone as stupid!
      4. +6
        11 November 2015 18: 40
        Vladimyrych

        Everything would be fine ... but this opinion does not correspond a little to realities, but also to the needs- "And forget about contracts with" partners "until your own Army is advanced.", At one time, one of the considerable ranks in the military-industrial complex, They asked what kind of business they were, we shish, Indians, novye. ANSWER-the situation is such that on contracts with them, they did not keep their production, but they did what the consolidated West, like a lemon, drives cheekbones with fear ...
      5. 0
        12 November 2015 10: 09
        I support! First of all, to provide our army with the latest technology, and of course to increase quantitatively, too much space in our East.
    2. +4
      11 November 2015 17: 38
      As I noted earlier, now the BBW is being pumped in all directions with new technology.
      1. Tor5
        0
        11 November 2015 18: 07
        Very correct! It is necessary not only to supply equipment, but also to introduce new techniques.
      2. 0
        12 November 2015 00: 02
        Quote: Sith Lord
        As I noted earlier, now the BBW is being pumped in all directions with new technology.

        And you look at the map what is BBO and the 3rd Command of the VKS. So what comes in is a drop in the bucket.
    3. 0
      11 November 2015 20: 30
      Interestingly, in the photo to the article, the innovative T-80 is not at all innovative ...
      1. +1
        11 November 2015 22: 40
        In my opinion, the best of the t-64,72,90. Of course, the t-90am does not count.
      2. +4
        11 November 2015 23: 25
        Quote: Prapor-527
        Interestingly, in the photo to the article, the innovative T-80 is not at all innovative ...

        It's time to get used to the fact that the photo to the articles is like a fence on which anything can be anything!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +3
    11 November 2015 17: 23
    There is a rearmament, acquaintance with new models and is necessary for the future personnel.
    1. -29
      11 November 2015 17: 32
      Since when is the T-72 tank a new weapon? If you removed this junk, you wouldn’t disgrace yourself in the west.
      1. +19
        11 November 2015 17: 47
        This refers to the modernized T-72B3. In my opinion, last week we all saw the "NEW" Abrams, which was put into service in 1980. By the way, the T-72 was put into service in 73, so your abryasha did not go far !!! But just do not forget that we already have armata, but you do not have nichrome, even the best practices in this type of technique. By the way, maybe you are not aware that there is not even an automatic loader in the adrams, instead of it the negro sits shells in the chamber and shoves, and in the T-72 there is and was originally. So, without knowing the topic, you would not be disgraced ...
        1. +10
          11 November 2015 17: 55
          Would not you disgrace?
          Well, I think that blue eggs do not care ...
          1. +5
            11 November 2015 18: 12
            Quote: Mama_Cholli
            Well, I think that blue eggs do not care ...

            if they got infected from the blue ass, but as you know, there are no brains in the ass. It does not follow the realities of the day at all that the latest MiG-29 ++ are higher than the first. At the biathlon, we could hear that the T-72 at the biathlon is much higher in terms of performance than the T-72 sold earlier abroad. This is what tankers say, not blue eggs ringing.
      2. +4
        11 November 2015 17: 55
        Quote: Blue eggs
        Since when is the T-72 tank a new weapon? If you removed this junk, you wouldn’t disgrace yourself in the west.

        Why are you and your abarashkai not showing themselves to a tank biologist! am
      3. +6
        11 November 2015 18: 01
        Ukro-troll or home-grown liberal-cub, zareg today ... laughing
      4. +2
        11 November 2015 18: 10
        Quote: Blue Eggs
        Since when is the T-72 tank a new weapon? If you removed this junk, you wouldn’t disgrace yourself in the west.

        The first time you hear that tanks can upgrade?
        T-72 produced since 1973
        M1 Abrams Start of production 1980
        You may not have noticed, but both of these machines are of the same age and have more than one modernization.
        For your jo worry!
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. +2
        11 November 2015 18: 26
        Already wrote on this topic. The vaunted Abrams burns from a large-caliber machine gun, it is worth getting into the aft part of the tower where the add-on is located. the generator with its own fuel tank and the burning fuel pours onto the roof of the engine compartment. Now the question is, knowing such a flaw in their car for thirty-five years, the bright minds of the owners of the blue scrambled eggs could think of something? Or "genius" does not allow!
        And this is just one drawback of the "Best Tank in the World" according to "Discovery".
  4. +1
    11 November 2015 17: 25
    I'm wondering how the crew is trained? for example, a new tank arrives at the troops, and now it was brought to V / H, and then what? Do soldiers climb inside and start reading instructions and checking everything by typing? or some representative from the factory shows all the subtleties and nuances? smile
    1. +1
      11 November 2015 17: 31
      First, there will be a business trip to the manufacturer for theoretical and practical training with a staff. Then, teaching aids will be developed ... and a training course for young specialists (recruits) will be introduced - then military exercises using similar systems in battle follow ... (it seems to me) and not just brought in and started poking hi
      1. +1
        11 November 2015 18: 01
        And if the training will be six months? Will they live at the plant for six months?
    2. +2
      11 November 2015 17: 31
      Good time of day mr!
      In my opinion 1, theorist 2, theorist + naglidne upraz.
      3.practice and practice + development of skills, shooting in volume 4
      newcomers, control over unfamiliar terrain, extreme conditions, etc., etc.
    3. +2
      11 November 2015 17: 35
      AdekvatNICK

      Everything is much more complicated.

      Of course, you need to be able to drive a car. Since the soldier is 18 years old. Here is an ordinary car, 3-5 years old learned to drive.

      But much more than that, it takes more time to teach tactics. Ways of interaction. Survival methods and countermeasures. The function of the use of weapons. Material part, maintenance and troubleshooting. You can learn this for about 5 years and get out of ignorance.
    4. +3
      11 November 2015 18: 27
      To begin with, the officers go to the special-purpose unit, where the latest weapons are tested by military engineers under the supervision of test technicians, where the officers receive the first lessons in handling weapons, and only then the manufacturer’s mission to the factory and everything that the Air Force Captain wrote below.
      But there are apparently exceptions: one officer described the "first test of the pen" with "Bumblebee", when a huge pipe and instructions were brought for the assault on the village, where it was written "do not shoot closer than 150 meters." Well, from 200 meters, he rumbled around the house with "spirits", almost deaf and crazy from what he saw.
  5. +4
    11 November 2015 17: 28
    To gather chtoli going? soldier
  6. +1
    11 November 2015 17: 29
    Why a thousand officers? Why not fifty thousand? For this purpose, new modifications make it possible for ALL specialized troops to study them objectively and with the help of these modern weapons they can make a specific ay-ay-ay. Otherwise, why do constant weapon upgrades do?
    1. 0
      11 November 2015 18: 18
      Mikhail Krapivin (1) SU  Today, 17:29 New


      Why a thousand officers? Why not fifty thousand


      And how many officers do we have in the tank troops, in your opinion? mid-level commanders? It’s not like 50 thousand., I think, if you can figure out how many tanks are in service
  7. +2
    11 November 2015 17: 32
    Quote: AdekvatNICK
    I'm wondering how the crew is trained? for example, a new tank arrives at the troops, and now it was brought to V / H, and then what? Do soldiers climb inside and start reading instructions and checking everything by typing? or some representative from the factory shows all the subtleties and nuances?

    We should go to serve a year and everything will become clear, such questions will not arise. soldier
    But it’s impossible to talk about the learning process on the forum, military secret !!! laughing
    1. 0
      11 November 2015 17: 57
      when I served me only Kalash trusted)
      1. +3
        11 November 2015 18: 04
        And ammo different? laughing
      2. +1
        11 November 2015 18: 24
        But what about edged weapons !? O_o
        haven't you peeled the potato? =)))
      3. +4
        11 November 2015 18: 33
        Quote: AdekvatNICK
        when I served me only Kalash trusted)

        But they didn’t even trust the builders of weapons: they are such animals that just give them weapons, that’s how they will be in Paris in three days.
        1. +1
          11 November 2015 21: 24
          And a day later they used to conduct excursions around the White House! laughing
  8. 0
    11 November 2015 17: 38
    Quote: the most important
    It is necessary not only to demonstrate, it is necessary to supply new weapons systems to the troops.
  9. 0
    11 November 2015 19: 38
    Why the hell with this fagot to argue. If Una had the opportunity, then they would have already put Armata into the troops, but these eggs are not allowed to go on.
  10. +5
    11 November 2015 19: 55
    recently returned from a business trip to improve the knowledge of signalmen, a double impression. on the one hand, the money was swelled to hell into the educational material base, on the other hand, the lieutenant spent a year ago graduating from college in another specialty. for that charter, everything is in order, with a drum! conclusion: the money swelled, but how to teach and what they don’t know !!!
    so who knew what and left, and in the troops there’s no such technique taught sad
  11. 0
    12 November 2015 03: 44
    Quote: shasherin.pavel
    Quote: Vladimir
    forget about contracts with "partners"

    it means arming our army at the expense of the people, if Iraq wants to pay 130% of the cost for our weapons, and he can, because he wants our weapons, then having sold three tanks to Iraq, we can put one tank into the army at the expense of another state.

    Your glory to God’s ears ... You forgot that for a start you need to provide all the suits of Serdyukov and Vasiliev. After which we receive, Iraq paid for two tanks, Seryukov’s harem financially satisfied, and from the budget pocket we owe one tank. The fact that something falls into our army is a MIRACLE. (Please do not minus the emotions) Do not need other people's money if the treasury is not robbed. But lads must be taught. From country marshals to privates ...
  12. cap
    0
    12 November 2015 03: 53
    Charges must be carried out.
    It is very important to maintain weapon handling skills.
    So as not to repeat 41.
  13. 0
    12 November 2015 05: 51
    Quote: bedniyyorik
    recently returned from a business trip to improve the knowledge of signalmen, a double impression. on the one hand, the money was swelled to hell into the educational material base, on the other hand, the lieutenant spent a year ago graduating from college in another specialty. for that charter, everything is in order, with a drum! conclusion: the money swelled, but how to teach and what they don’t know !!!
    so who knew what and left, and in the troops there’s no such technique taught sad

    So nothing has changed unfortunately, it’s me on the methodology for conducting training in the system of command training! As before, to collect from the army (district) all in a heap, then conduct drill review, and most importantly ... take offsets! fellow There was no sense from these gatherings, the main thing that happened at them was communication between old comrades and the exchange of experience, meeting new people. But the organizers did not have any participation in this. Yes, it is a sin to conceal many "leaders" at training places and often unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer real literate people every year. As one of the commanders said: “An ignoramus teaches an ignoramus!” I understand that the command training system has not been fully built, only new books have been written, ripping off old thoughts and rearranging the proposals. Yes ... and the main thing is probably left - to fill out the logbooks for conducting classes with officers on command post in groups !!! The main thing is paperwork, schedule and synopsis! No, is that not so, comrade officers? If not, then this is very, very cool! Then we will succeed! Military happiness to everyone! (I guess you know what it is)
    1. 0
      12 November 2015 08: 56
      as everyone knows the current, I see it constantly but not in the army :)
  14. 0
    12 November 2015 10: 25
    T-80 - handsome!
  15. 0
    12 November 2015 10: 45
    Quote: cniza
    you must first train officers then the rest of the hp ..

    Who told you that you first need to train officers, and then the rest of the hp when the ratio of officer and sergeant-ordinary personnel in the unit is approximately 1:33? And if the officer is killed, but he has not yet informed the rest of the hp. knowledge gained by him? No, you need to change the initial ratio of knowledge carriers to 33: 1.
  16. 0
    12 November 2015 22: 56
    This is all, of course, good and wonderful! Only here, initially, it is necessary to study in military schools and training schools, releasing qualified specialists, and not already in the troops.
    But Tolik Opilkin destroyed the military education system and a bunch of schools with him.
    It’s sad ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"