Military Review

Representatives of the Obama administration continue to say that Russia is to blame for the Syrian crisis ("The Nation", USA)

48
Will it come to the American political establishment that Russia and the United States are fighting on the same side?


Representatives of the Obama administration continue to say that Russia is to blame for the Syrian crisis ("The Nation", USA)Last week, on November 5, The Wall Street Journal wrote that the CIA is going to expand its illegal war in Syria, increasing supply weapons the so-called moderate Syrian opposition. This clearly demonstrates the falsity of the promises made by President Obama not to embroil the United States in an indirect military conflict with Russia. Judging by the hearings held last Wednesday in the House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs on the “escalation of the situation in Syria as a result of Russia's actions”, the president may not be afraid that the CIA will face serious opposition in America.

The committee heard testimony from two assistant secretaries of state - Victoria Nuland (Victoria Nuland), responsible for relations with Russia, and Anne Patterson, on whose shoulders there is an unpleasant duty to engage in American politics in North Africa and the Middle East.

The first thing to say about these hearings: they once again emphasized the tremendous dexterity of the American “war party” - that inter-party coalition of “hawks” from Congress, which, as British politician John Morley said on another occasion, constantly changes goals but not the main task. And the task of these people is the same - to spoil relations between America and Russia forever. Previously, they focused on the notorious Russian invasion of Ukraine, now - on the "escalation of the situation" in Syria.

Assistant Secretary of State Nuland said straight away: “By directly intervening in the battles in Syria, Russia increased the flow of refugees, which was a dangerous phenomenon even before and which even the most generous European countries are not able to accept.”

Some members of the committee were quick to agree with these words, which are not confirmed by facts or chronology.

Congressman Ami Bera (Ami Bera) stressed that Russian intervention in the Syrian civil war "exacerbated" the situation and was the main cause of the refugee crisis. Beru was especially worried that this crisis could affect Turkey. Perhaps, if the congressman took the trouble to think a little, he would understand that the refugees flowed into Turkey (and from there to Europe) precisely because Turkey has for years contributed to attempts to overthrow the Assad regime.

Congressman Jerry Connolly (Gerry Connolly) solemnly asked if Russia would finally stop invading Turkish airspace. Meanwhile, Connoli, of course, would be better to ask if Turkey will finally stop helping ISIS.

The only one who expressed dissatisfaction with the constant hostile attitude of the United States towards Russia - especially strange against the background of our sympathy for the Sunni tyrannies of the Persian Gulf - was Congressman Dana Rohrabacher.

Rohrabacher added that such countries as Saudi Arabia are ruled by extremist cliques that are “no better than Assad”, and that the unfriendly policy of America towards Russia has already done a lot of harm. According to Rohrabacher, our rejection of the deal proposed by Putin five years ago over Syria led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people and turned millions into refugees.

Nevertheless, the “war party” continues to repeat with the same stubbornness: “Putin is to blame for everything.”

Patterson contrived in her speech to outbid Nuland. She seriously stated congressman Ileana Ros-Leytinen (Ileana Ros-Lehtinen) that ISIL and Assad are "connected." Is she even capable of believing in such a thing? For Assad, it would definitely be news.

In fact, Patterson continued from where Nuland stopped. According to her (not true to reality), "85 – 90% of Russian attacks are directed not against ISIL, but against other opposition forces." When Patterson spoke of the mythical “moderates,” she was asked if we were creating a coalition with Al-Nusroy, and in response, the Assistant Secretary of State admitted that perhaps some of our “moderate” opposition groups were forced to join the Islamists. Yes, yes, of course.

Guess who told her? Right, Dana Rohrabacher. If we dump Assad, he asked, are we sure that Syria will not collapse as Libya collapsed after NATO’s catastrophic intervention in 2011? Patterson assured Rohrabacher that this is unlikely. Allegedly "there is a broad consensus," suggesting that there are government institutions in Syria that will continue after Assad, while in Libya there were no such institutions.

A strange statement, isn't it? Did Patterson really mean that the Libyan government, which entered into an agreement with the US and British governments in 2003, didn’t exist?

At the same time, the participants in the hearings did not seem to realize that the Russian “escalation” in Syria could help us in the fight against ISIS. It makes you think that the main problem lies not in the Russian airstrikes, but in the obsession of our government with the idea of ​​overthrowing Assad.

The picture painted by Nuland and Patterson was based on lies and inappropriate simplifications. Unfortunately, there is nothing new in this approach.

From the very beginning of the Cold War, our authorities were guided by the advice of Dean Acheson not to neglect the “clearer than the truth” arguments. In Washington, for almost 70 years, it has been assumed that the people “do not go into nuances,” and therefore politicians simply have to lie to them.

The propensity for “clearer than the truth” is so ingrained in the Washington genetic code that, right before our eyes, smart, capable and diligent officials like Victoria Nuland and Ann Patterson are incredibly nonsense at the congressional hearings.

However, perhaps not everything is lost. On the same day, an event was held at Rayburn House, which was extremely pleasantly contrasted with Patterson and Nuland’s aggressive speeches in defense of the new Cold War. At the informal hearings organized by the Dean of the House of Representatives and the oldest member of its Judicial Committee, John Conyers, four distinguished representatives of the revived American East-West Harmony Committee spoke. (I officially confess: I work on this committee, and Nation writing editor Stephen Cohen is one of the founding members of his board.)

At the hearings of Conyers, there was no Manichaeism characteristic of the champions of the new Cold War. Professor Cohen, Professor Ellen Mickiewicz, Ambassador Jack Matlock and former head of Procter and Gamble John Pepper urged Congress to avoid a biased attitude to the Russian topic, examples of which could be seen on the same day in the Committee in foreign affairs.

By the end of the day, our government structures — the most unreliable repository of secrets in the world — leaked the news that, according to intelligence information, the fall of the ISIL killed the 224 civilians (including 25 children) after the Russian plane crashed. An AFP weekend report said: "The black box data from a Russian plane crashed last week in Egypt shows that the bomb was the cause of the crash."

In this case, perhaps, it will finally reach the American political establishment that Russia and the United States are fighting on the same side?
Author:
Originator:
http://www.thenation.com/article/obama-administration-officials-insist-russia-is-to-blame-for-the-syrian-crisis/
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 12 November 2015 07: 09 New
    12
    Представитель Госдепа США в Комитете Палаты: "Сирийском кризисе виновата Россия,за то что не дает Американцам создать в Сирии "управляемый хаос".
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 12 November 2015 07: 19 New
      12
      In this case, maybe the American political establishment will finally reach that Russia and the USA are fighting on the same side
      come on ! belay
      1. oleg-gr
        oleg-gr 12 November 2015 07: 22 New
        +6
        Assistant Secretary of State Nuland said straight away: “By directly intervening in the battles in Syria, Russia increased the flow of refugees, which was a dangerous phenomenon even before and which even the most generous European countries are not able to accept.”

        Here is the explanation for Europe. Who's guilty. What to do is also known: invest more money in NATO and the US military-industrial complex.
        1. EGOrkka
          EGOrkka 12 November 2015 08: 00 New
          +2
          IN kak.a from Afghanistan? .. are we also bombing Syria? smile
          1. Temples
            Temples 12 November 2015 08: 45 New
            +1
            Nuland is responsible for relations with Russia.
            Relations to put it mildly did not work out)))
            As a result, she blames Russia for all the failures of the Americans.
            In principle, it can be awarded for activities.
            As a result of her work, the falsehood and abomination of American politics became apparent to everyone, but it is worth a lot !!!
            I won’t be surprised that, putting on the pants in her pants, she will immediately cry out: “Look! Here’s the proof!” Russia threw me in pants. laughing
        2. oblako
          oblako 12 November 2015 08: 07 New
          +4
          Как говорят: "выступать в конгрессе США - не мешки ворочать"! Тумблер "логика" ставиться в положение "выкл" и далее идет сплошная защита национальных интересов США, агрессором считается тот, кто напал на кого то раньше, чем это сделали США, если напали позже, то своими действиями "усугубили ситуацию", главное первым прокричать и разбрызгать по площадям, пусть все опровергают и оправдываются че... мешки то не ворочать...
        3. RBLip
          RBLip 12 November 2015 09: 44 New
          +3
          Quote: oleg-gr
          Directly intervening in battles in Syria, Russia
      2. ImPerts
        ImPerts 12 November 2015 07: 25 New
        +3

        Finally, the men will find out ...
        1. Kostyar
          Kostyar 12 November 2015 07: 36 New
          0
          Я конторский, ваших организаторов падения уже наши "опрашивают", думали не узнаем...?!
      3. anEkeName
        anEkeName 12 November 2015 07: 44 New
        +1
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        In this case, it may come to the American political establishment that Russia and the United States are fighting on the same side.

        come on ! belay

        Your works are wonderful, Lord. It happens.
        1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
          Vladimir Pozlnyakov 12 November 2015 10: 28 New
          0
          The USvkii establishment is closely tied to the oligarchic military-industrial complex! The recognition of the Russian Federation as an equal partner means a reduction in the financing of military concerns and the ruin of many of them! And the overweight, obese rabble, called the American nation, thinks as he is told by the zombies or does not think at all, with blind faith that Fushington is spreading democracy around the world!
      4. andrei332809
        andrei332809 12 November 2015 07: 44 New
        +3
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        come on !

        hi
        Still, the Yankees from Svidomo got infected, it all went wrong ...
        1. vlad.svargin
          vlad.svargin 12 November 2015 07: 58 New
          +3
          andrei332809 (9)
          Still, the Yankees from Svidomo got infected, it all went wrong ...

          Это ещё вопрос кто от кого, скорей у свидомитов источником заразы является старший "партнёр" из за океана bully
          1. andrei332809
            andrei332809 12 November 2015 08: 30 New
            +1
            Quote: vlad.svargin
            скорей у свидомитов источником заразы является старший "партнёр" из за океана

            the senior partner does not wear harem pants, in which UncleVova somehow managed to give a shit.
            as one comrade spoke out, they jumped so fervently that they managed to spoil their collar wink
      5. Watchdog
        Watchdog 12 November 2015 09: 10 New
        +1
        In previous 357 series:
        Для удержания своего господства администрация США разрабатывают стратегию подрыва России как единственной силы способной уничтожить США в случае ведения ей агрессивных и захватнических войн в регионах где у РФ есть жизненно-важные геополитические интересы. Подрыв изнутри путем создания "оппозиции" - иначе антигосударственных сил финансируемых США проваливается. Приходится включать внешние инструменты - атака на западе - укромайдан и атака на юге - Сирия. Россия наносит упреждающий удар на западном направлении - переводя Крым под свой контроль и создавая плацдарм в виде т.н. "Новороссии" не позволяя США замкнуть фронт по границе с РФ, США предпринимают шаги по обескровливанию российской экономики, вводя экономическую блокаду со стороны европейских государств, а затем переключаются на южное направление создавая ИГИЛ как инструмент ведения широкомасштабной маневренной гибридной войны (по типу боевых действий буров в англо-бурской войне), однако когда жизнь режима Асада уже висит на волоске Россия активно включается в процесс и уничтожает ИГИЛ превращая в пыль миллионы долларов вложенных США в это предприятие.
        And of course this suggests that Russia and the USA are fighting on the same side!
        request
      6. cniza
        cniza 12 November 2015 10: 46 New
        0
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        In this case, maybe the American political establishment will finally reach that Russia and the USA are fighting on the same side
        come on ! belay



        Started for health, finished for peace. The author denied himself.
    2. iliya87
      iliya87 12 November 2015 09: 34 New
      +1
      The USA has been sausages in the region for 14 years and of course they are doing everything right. Russia intervened, another month has not passed and we are guilty of an influx of refugees, of ISIS attacks, etc. Class logic !!! Bravo))
  2. SAM 5
    SAM 5 12 November 2015 07: 12 New
    +4
    Previously, they focused on the notorious Russian invasion of Ukraine, now they focused on "escalating the situation" in Syria.

    The pig will always find dirt
  3. Signore Tomato
    Signore Tomato 12 November 2015 07: 14 New
    +4
    Хе-хе. По ходу, Дана Рорабахер - просто посетитель в этой палате №6 под названием "Конгресс США".
    I mean, he’s healthy, but as for the rest, it’s very impossible to say ...
    1. sannych
      sannych 12 November 2015 08: 00 New
      +1
      Rohrabacher - well done! (even though the name was written a little language and fingers are not twisted). But the article! Pinch me, is this not RT? Americans (not migrants, not ours on order) write sound thoughts! Yes, and the media is not like the last.
  4. ImPerts
    ImPerts 12 November 2015 07: 18 New
    +4
    Very reminiscent of a poem about guilty Putin:
    "За окошком дождь и град.
    This is Putin's fault!
    Cat threw kittens -
    Putin is to blame
    The hostess threw the bait -
    Guilty Guess!
    Here ends the board
    У несчастного бычка..."

    The position of the State Department is logical in nature. An ordinary American citizen does not bother himself with logical chains, linking some facts with others. He sees a news feed with headlines that the Russians are bombing Syria. He sees reports about the poor refugees who are caught in the Mediterranean Sea and ... And everything is clear to him. He does not know or does not remember how it all began, who torn Iraq, Libya, began to destroy Syria.
    He does not remember how bin Laden began his activities, but he remembers Obama and Clinton's tense faces when US special forces roamed around bin Laden's home in Pakistan, playing in the cop. CT wins ...
    Quote: Signor Tomato
    Rohrabacher is just a visitor

    No, well, in Libya too
    Patterson assured Rohrabacher that this is unlikely. Allegedly, "there is a broad consensus", suggesting that there are state institutions in Syria that will remain after Assad, while there were no such institutions in Libya.

    When in Libya they started buzzing, they discussed the topic of a wide alliance of rebels. The topic was covered after the events in Benghazi, when these rebels attacked the embassy of one overseas country.
  5. pvv113
    pvv113 12 November 2015 07: 20 New
    +7
    They got these American politicians like nulands. I’m all waiting, I won’t wait when the Yellowstone volcano starts working, so that the USA, this resident of evil, will be burned out with a root. Sorry for ordinary people, but it's worth it.
    1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
      Vladimir Pozlnyakov 12 November 2015 11: 08 New
      0
      Or realize the events of Stalin’s anecdotal dialogue with Kurchatov:
      "КАК ТАМ ДЕЛА, ТОВАРИЩ КУРЧАТОВ, С ПРОЛИВОМ МЕЖДУ МЕКСИКОЙ И АЛЯСКОЙ?!
  6. V.ic
    V.ic 12 November 2015 07: 23 New
    +2
    In this case, maybe the American political establishment will finally realize that Russia and the United States are fighting on the same side? Posted by James Carden

    Attempts by the author of the article reason the indicated contingent a priori doomed to failure. I once read a book by M. Norbekov with an interesting title "Д.у.р.а.к.а учить, что мертвого лечить" /в связи с вероятностью удаленя "фильтром" = написание объекта учения через ( . ) /
    1. Vita vko
      Vita vko 12 November 2015 08: 21 New
      0
      Quote: V.ic
      Attempts by the author of the article to reason the indicated contingent a priori are doomed to failure

      Не стоит недооценивать американцев. Внешняя глупость может серьезно дезориентировать. Отказ от $ во внешней и внутренней торговле несет ущерб США гораздо больший чем все войны и теракты вместе взятые. А Саудовская Аравия, Кувейт, Катар и другие монархическо-террористические режимы как раз является опорой для гигантского гос.долга США. Поэтому они лучшие друзья. Вы только представите сколько в Европе и США миллиардеров со своими ручными политиками! И их "благополучие" и возможности грабить весь Мир находится под угрозой от действий России, Китая и некоторых других стран. Конечно западные кланы олигархов сделают все, что бы уничтожить политиков и народы которые посягнули на их финансовое благополучие, особенно в условиях кризиса.
  7. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 12 November 2015 07: 24 New
    +2
    "В таком случае, может быть, до американского политического истеблишмента, наконец, дойдет, что Россия и США воюют на одной стороне"

    Россия и США не воюют на одной стороне. Мы пока находятся в режиме "вынужденные союзники по некоторым вопросам", больше похожем на вооруженный нейтралитет в отношении вооруженных сил, находящихся (или действующих, летающих) на территории Сирии.В более глубоком, глобальном смысле наши цели координально разнятся.

    Конгресс СыША своими высказываниями похож на детсадовского ребенка, который запнулся о стул и теперь пинает его в отместку "а что он здесь стоит!".
  8. 31rus
    31rus 12 November 2015 07: 31 New
    0
    Вот вам и "холодная война",не чуть не удивила позиция США,курс один ,использовать любую возможность навредить,втянуть Россию в "затяжной конфликт",одновременно "готовя почву",в самой России,нужно быть готовым к разным вариантам развития событий,в том числе и крупных провокаций
  9. MARGADON
    MARGADON 12 November 2015 07: 31 New
    0
    When something doesn’t work or goes wrong, the foolish people begin to raise their voices, scream and sometimes squeal. I feel sorry for these paranoid people, they swell so much money, but it only turns out to be a bunch.
  10. Stinger
    Stinger 12 November 2015 07: 35 New
    0
    This song has two verses: Russia must and Russia is to blame.
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 November 2015 07: 35 New
    +1
    "Putin is to blame."

    Вчера показывали публичные дебаты кандидатов в президенты от республиканцев. Так одна "дама" истерически вещала, что необходимо под носом России укреплять 6 флот, под носом России разворачивать ПРО в Польше, под носом России проводить aggressive teachings in the Baltic states (literally). True, I personally did not understand what aggressive exercises mean. But obviously the person herself who uttered this obviously does not understand, the main word sounds aggressively. There, only Trump looked adequate and said sensible things. And what to expect from such politicians.
  12. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 12 November 2015 07: 36 New
    +1
    Сша, объявив монополию на распространение " американских ценностей" во всём мире уже давно погрязла в лжи и лицемерии,за всей её политикой стоит пренебрежение основными человеческими ценностями, начиная с права на жизнь.
  13. crumb
    crumb 12 November 2015 07: 37 New
    0
    Putin seems to be GOD in the USA!
  14. f, hfrjlf, hf
    f, hfrjlf, hf 12 November 2015 07: 40 New
    0
    Yes, stop publishing what they say in the White House, no one listens to them anyway, they have already lied so much that they think they are telling the truth, let psychiatrists deal with them and drug control, because gerych from Agana is disappearing somewhere
  15. Berthan
    Berthan 12 November 2015 07: 49 New
    +1
    ... continues with the same persistence to repeat: "Putin is to blame for everything."


    Surprise is not a parishioner ...
  16. asar
    asar 12 November 2015 07: 55 New
    0
    am.ery! Maybe stop blaming from a sore head to a healthy one?
    В бардаке под названием "ситуация в Ливии", "ситуация в бывшей Югославии", "ситуация в современном Афганистане", "ситуация в Ираке", "ситуация в Сирии", "ситуация в/на украине, "ситуация в прибалтике", "ситуация на рубежах Китая"... тоже повинен Путин В.В.?
    У вас амер.ы "крыша едет не спеша, тихо шифером шурша"!
  17. sir_obs
    sir_obs 12 November 2015 07: 59 New
    +1
    Это какое же надо иметь терпение, чтобы всю эту бредятину выслушивать из раза в раз... Из меня бы точно дипломата не вышло...команда "пли", как-то короче и убедительнее
  18. mamont5
    mamont5 12 November 2015 07: 59 New
    0
    "до американского политического истеблишмента, наконец, дойдет, что Россия и США воюют на одной стороне?"

    Formally, yes, but in fact ...?
  19. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 12 November 2015 08: 04 New
    +1
    Белый дом превратился окончательно в Дом сумасшедших,"городить" такое и при этом верить в свою чушь могут только люди с больной психикой! Похоже приходит время расплаты для США за все грехи совершенные против человечества, ведь если Бог решает кого-то наказать,то он в первую очередь лишает того разума! Нынешняя правящая в США команда из палаты № 6 полна желания как можно больше "нагадить" не только своему народу,но и всемирному сообществу,а почему бы и нет, тем более когда срок пребывания администрации "копченого" подходит к концу! Безумцы ,которые "тушат" пожар керосином, наверное перед своим уходом решили "громко хлопнуть дверью",так один по имени Адольф уже "хлопнул"... крышкой собственного гроба!
  20. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 12 November 2015 08: 04 New
    0
    Pump up, pump up. Like a bad boxer, before a fight, it’s time.
  21. kasperian_1
    kasperian_1 12 November 2015 08: 13 New
    0
    That's about the source of the problems in the Middle East, and in other regions it is not for them to argue.
  22. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 12 November 2015 08: 21 New
    0
    В Америке очень любят безымянные ссылки на кого то и что то.Можно сказать конкретно: Маккейн считает так то, или Хилари думает так то...можно спросить у этих "философов" что думать не запрещается, а болтать где не поподя уже не гоже!
  23. NeRTT
    NeRTT 12 November 2015 08: 25 New
    0
    NOO.E. EFT .... THAT IS WHAT ANGLAXAXES NEEDED, WHO WILL BE DESHEMAN ON BLACK MARKETS TO REMAIN UNDER THE GOVERNMENT OF RESTORED SYRIA ... AND EVERYTHING WILL BE BUY FOR AN INTENTIONAL REDUCTION OF THE PRICE OF OIL DELIVER ... BECAUSE OF THE FALL OF THE RUBLING ... BUT V.V. PUTIN THINKS CLEARLY AND FAR FROM: HERE TO THE ROOT OF THEIR ZEOTE'S ROTTEN ... THERE IS THE ANGLOSAKS TO ALL THE LADIES AND VOICES !!! ! am
  24. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 12 November 2015 08: 28 New
    +1
    What I like most is that they carry all this nonsense in Congress in all seriousness, with solemn faces, with a stingy male (Nuland) tear in their eyes. Either the great actors disappear, or they themselves believe that this is unlikely. I liked the article, a great article, even surprising for the author from there.
  25. solovey
    solovey 12 November 2015 08: 29 New
    0
    Yes, nothing needs to be explained to these stupid and greedy amers !!!! They make concessions only when they are very scared (as practice has shown since the Caribbean crisis) !!!
  26. Yak-3P
    Yak-3P 12 November 2015 08: 40 New
    0
    grandmothers of the white house ... an unmanned zone in Syria, etc .-- - everything for the American voters, all these nonsense for their internal use - like we are cool that we can bend the GDP, then it will fade when ours approaches ..
  27. Naum
    Naum 12 November 2015 08: 44 New
    0
    Vile Lyceum! It would be funny if it weren’t so bloody ... The amers and Syria obviously didn’t do it. The Russians broke their script in the last act. It does not work out a second Libya. Such an oil business is at risk!
    Однако, полосатые никогда не успокоятся и будут сеять смерть и разрущение по всему миру до тех пор, пока им это будет выгодно. Вот когда "жареный" их клюнет в зад - тогда и наступят перемены в сознании. Есть и у них перспективные болевые точки, помимо просыпающегося Йелоустоуна.
  28. Mercenary
    Mercenary 12 November 2015 08: 50 New
    +1
    Could not lie for any- THIS PUTIN IS GUILTY !!!
    Librasts with traitors and all sorts of rabble - can confirm
    ! am
    1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
      Vladimir Pozlnyakov 12 November 2015 11: 04 New
      0
      Когда я вижу на политшоу постоянных представителей ПЯТОЙ КОЛОННЫ, либерастов, прикормленных Госдепом, этих "станкевичей", "надеждиных" и прочую тявкающую шушеру, не говоря уже об оголтелых защитниках Бандерии (эти вообще кроме петли и осины ничего не заслуживают), начинаешь жалеть что нет у нас политика с жёсткостью Иосифа Виссарионовича!!!!
  29. vell.65
    vell.65 12 November 2015 09: 00 New
    +1
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    In this case, it may come to the American political establishment that Russia and the United States are fighting on the same side.

    Perhaps with a big stretch, but the goals are different.
  30. guzik007
    guzik007 12 November 2015 09: 57 New
    +1
    The White House has embraced cognitive dissonance ..
  31. marinier
    marinier 12 November 2015 10: 06 New
    +2
    Good time of the day, yep!
    In truth, all these utterances, pr-that, state dep, all nuland, mccain
    and their ilk, tired of it.
    Ho4etsia shouted out these disc zokeys, but everyone bothered with their zaezaia plastinka
    change her, no one believes YOU!
    If not for one BUT !!!
    CIA, here’s the 4th menia, the 4th office, it’s daring a hand on the supply pulse
    weapons gangs in Syria.
    As if the hyenas of the hymen didn’t take advantage of the MANPADS against V.K.
    That’s 4 menia that excited me, and they did something 4 in Afghanistan with a stinger.
    I would advise, would correspond to the services of RUSSIA, pay attention to this.
    Well, so it’s all toothless and unbroken split bleating, not worth the shell
    Eaten Eggs.
  32. sledge
    sledge 12 November 2015 10: 13 New
    +1
    Representatives of the Obama administration continue to say that Russia is to blame for the Syrian crisis ("The Nation", USA)
    Yes, to blame, to blame. And Russia is to blame for the tornado of regularly falling on the UkrSA and in earthquakes (tsunamis) and other crap!
    How zadolbal already this kindergarten !!!!!
  33. AlexTires
    AlexTires 12 November 2015 10: 35 New
    0
    If you listen to Mr. Obama, then Russia is to blame for all the troubles of the world, and as a result, personally Vladimir Putin. The American president is not used to being responsible for his actions, and here he finds the guilty without guilt.
    American ultra-conservatives clearly drive the United States into a corner. And the more they do this, the higher the price for this policy will be for the United States. The idea of ​​a possible victory for Russia in Syria and the subsequent collapse of the American policy of one-vector hegemony in the world leads them to a state of hysteria and prostration.
  34. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
    Vladimir Pozlnyakov 12 November 2015 10: 49 New
    0
    Quote: ImPerts
    The topic was covered after the events in Benghazi, when these rebels attacked the embassy of one overseas country.


    Ну чего скромничать - "майдан" в Бенгази - местные "повстанцы" (те же бандеровцы), не разобрались и грохнули СШАвского посла (нужно было лизнуть, а они гавкнули)! Но без последствий ("с кем не бывает - специфика дикарей СШАвцы простили")!Зато Фашингтон в Укропии "поумнел", загодя заслал для руководства ТРЁХ "богоизбранных" , а их соплеменница Нуланд начала кормить куевский "майдан" ПЕЧЕНЮШКАМИ !
  35. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 12 November 2015 10: 52 New
    0
    Will it come to the American political establishment that Russia and the United States are fighting on the same side?

    In words, maybe they are fighting, but in actions this is not visible. Yes, and they can’t
    IG fight, not in order to foster, to destroy their own child.
  36. roskot
    roskot 12 November 2015 11: 31 New
    0
    that Russia is to blame for the Syrian crisis

    Well, do not blame yourself. Of course, Russia is to blame for all the troubles of the United States.
  37. Taranchello
    Taranchello 12 November 2015 11: 51 New
    0
    Clinical dolbyodyatly !!! Most of all amusing, like almost the whole world, listening to their complete heresy (Psak, all sorts of other crap, docs from social networks, unfounded accusations without any evidence, etc.), everyone understands perfectly well, I don’t believe that they are so stupid all, and at the same time with what rapture they lick mattresses w and x ... Deputants ...
  38. afrikanez
    afrikanez 12 November 2015 14: 04 New
    0
    Сша наверно забыли кто помог распространению ИГ на Ближнем Востоке. А бездоказательные и лживые обвинения это их, так сказать"конек". Их просто надо почаще окунать в их же дерь.о , что бы видели и помнили чего они натворили в мире.
  39. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 12 November 2015 15: 33 New
    0
    No one is stopping our representatives from declaring that America is to blame for the Syrian crisis. But for some reason they are modestly silent.
    1. Shurik70
      Shurik70 12 November 2015 23: 50 New
      +1
      And the meaning of throwing beads?
      Who wants to understand - just see the sequence of events.
      Anyone who does not want to think will eat what the media give, even if today they say the opposite of yesterday.
      Drag a few percent hesitant to their side? Nafig nafig. Sanctions will also be lifted ahead of time, and we still have not recovered from the oil dependence.
  40. Shurik70
    Shurik70 12 November 2015 22: 32 New
    +1
    constantly changing goals, but not the main task. But these people have one task - to spoil relations between America and Russia forever

    Wrong.
    Spoiling relations with Russia is just a tactical task.

    And strategic is absolute dominance. Military, financial and scientific.
    The method of achieving the goal is the inhibition of the development of the rest of the world. There are many ways - supporting terrorism, supporting radical opposition, seizing industries, crowding out local goods on domestic markets, promoting key representatives of their proteges, and, best of all, civil wars.

    So currently the enemies of the United States are Russia, China and Europe.
    They spread rot to Europe, creating a stream of refugees and destroying economic ties with Russia. They are trying to crush Russia with sanctions and cheap oil. China is trying to seize production.
    But it only turns out so far only with Europe. It’s hard for Russia, but we can stand it. And China itself in response captures production in the United States.